You can just hear them rattling the cages, howling to the moon and scratching their teenie-weenie peckers. I wonder how they are going to circumvent this one.
Oh, and is that burning documentation I smell? Boxes being emptied, files being deleted, and the hush-factor just became a murmur. And I’m guessing that more banksters are, at this very moment, sucking on a 9mm.
Maybe there is hope for the US after all?
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Gold again.
Gold continues upwards, this to no surprise to anyone with a brain. Again we hear some idiots claiming that the high is already reached or that we will soon see a correction. This is nonsense. If it takes half a year, one year or two, isn’t really the point, the point is that gold and other valuable metals will continue to go up. I have predicted a high around $2300/ounce, but there are some that claims much higher than that. $7000/ounce have been mentioned.
Here you can follow the gold-price:
Here you can follow the gold-price:
The true story of our ominous doom – Part II
As mentioned, economics is a very easy subject to grasp and understand. Contrary to popular belief you do not need to be a financial wiz to be able to interpret the market, and politicians don’t need to make judgment-calls in response to an economic crisis. You do not even need an education in finance or business, in fact, such an education might very well be in the way. Just look at all the mainstream cornflake economists that never seem to get anything right.
The free and open market works upon a couple of very understandable rules that never change. A couple of axioms that exists no matter what anyone says or tries to do.
Firstly supply always corresponds to demand and vice versa.
Secondly 1+1=2 and 2-1=1
Thirdly, our main source of information and what it all comes down to is prices. Prices is the way we measure how sort after a merchandise is, how valuable, how easy we can buy it, what the cost of making it versus the profit we can make in the end, and so on and so on.
So what happens when someone tries to manipulate the market, or if a government imposes a set of laws to control it? Basically nothing, the same rules apply still; however, the equation may differ a bit. If Government increases prices on something they consider to be dangerous, like tobacco, the real price stays the same. What has changed is the price plus the additional cost. If this additional cost goes to high, smuggling ensues, alternatives pops up, people start making their own. A very obvious example of this is drugs. Government has through imposed illegality and harsh penalties made sure that the price is astronomical, hence large profits can be made. In affect inviting people to produce and sell drugs. If the government happens to knock out a drug lab, prices goes up and the effect is even more criminals. This is why the war on drug never can be won. It’s a mathematical and factual impossibility.
Let’s take a fictive example as well and look at milk. Milk is one of mankind’s main sources of food, we use it for baking, quenching our thirst and lots of other things. Now, let’s assume that a couple of state-employed scientists figure out that milk is the main cause of cancer. After a couple of months of scaremongering in the media our bellowed politicians need to act and ban milk. They make it illegal and introduce a sentence of 10 years imprisonment for selling milk. This would make the milk-price quadruple or even more and since there are a lot of grandmas wanting to bake and kids that wants to drink milk, you have a huge market, and so in steps those that can and are willing to produce and sell milk on the illigal milk-market.
These sorts of distortions of the price, which it’s, all about, only change the preserved price, not the actual value or real price that would exist without the regulations and laws.
And as said, this is always true, no matter what anyone does, no matter how high the taxes goes or what the product or service in a particular case happens to be. It also applies to two very common commodities that is the main culprit behind our economic crisis and why it hasn’t and cannot end any time soon.
The two things I’m talking about are Interest rate and money.
Interest rate is actually the rate of paying back or getting back a certain percentage of money. If interest rates go up, loaning money or taking out a mortgage gets more expensive. If interest rates go down, it gets cheaper to borrow and getting into debt gets more appealing the lower the rate is. Or, in effect, when interest rates go down we tend to borrow and spend more money because saving it is in comparison a less rational choice. The opposite is also true, if interest rates go up, we tend to save the money and make more prudent choices of what to buy.
Money is just paper a certain central bank and a certain country have decided should be the way of doing trade. Instead of changing a bicycle for a carton of juice we use money. It makes trade easier and accumulated wealth can easier be stored and used for investments.
The money is printed and supplied from the central bank. The central bank lends or “gives” this money to other banks or financial institutes that in turn put it out on the market. However, and this is very important to understand, the banks does not lend out that particular amount they get from either the central bank or peoples savings, no, they lend out a lot more. This is called Fractional-reserve banking.
Fractional-reserve banking is the banking practice in which banks keep only a fraction of their deposits in reserve (as cash and other highly liquid assets) and lend out the remainder, while maintaining the simultaneous obligation to redeem all these deposits upon demand. By its nature, the practice of fractional reserve banking expands money supply (cash and demand deposits) beyond what it would otherwise be. Because of the prevalence of fractional reserve banking, the broad money supply of most countries is a multiple larger than the amount of base money created by the country's central bank. That multiple (called the money multiplier) is determined by the reserve requirement or other financial ratio requirements imposed by financial regulators.
Or, to put it in simpler terms; a bank has $100 in actual money, but lend to customers $2000-3000-4 000. As long as people don’t withdraw all their savings and pay back all their loans at the same time, the system “works”.
And, what is really important, the more people that borrow, the more customers, the more the bank can lend. For every additional $100 another couple of thousands are lend to the market.
If you understand everything written here, you also understand why this crisis emerged. What has happened is that too much money and too low interest rates have created distortions on several markets, most notably the housing and real-estate markets. So when people cannot pay back their loans, when mortgages are defaulting and the limit of spending has been reach, a contraction will happen. In fact it should happen. But in our saviors and great leaders steps and what do they do? They lower interest rates even further, throws more money into the system, borrow loads of more from other countries to spend it because the people are not spending enough.
So tell me again, how can this crisis be over?
As I said in the start, and as I have pointed out so many times, the math does not tell lies. The actual foundation cannot be changed.
Temporarily, this entire “stimulus”-madness can plaster over the basic problems; sweep them under the rug for a while. Not only will such actions eventually fail, but it will make the problems even worse.
Take a look at this little movie to further enhance your knowledge to what I have just told you. Then, to really make sure you understand, read through my text again. If you do this and you come out on the other side with this knowledge you will never trust anything any bank does ever again. You will stop listening to politicians crap and you will finally understand why our current crisis isn’t over.
The free and open market works upon a couple of very understandable rules that never change. A couple of axioms that exists no matter what anyone says or tries to do.
Firstly supply always corresponds to demand and vice versa.
Secondly 1+1=2 and 2-1=1
Thirdly, our main source of information and what it all comes down to is prices. Prices is the way we measure how sort after a merchandise is, how valuable, how easy we can buy it, what the cost of making it versus the profit we can make in the end, and so on and so on.
The free and open market works upon a couple of very understandable rules that never change. A couple of axioms that exists no matter what anyone says or tries to do.
Firstly supply always corresponds to demand and vice versa.
Secondly 1+1=2 and 2-1=1
Thirdly, our main source of information and what it all comes down to is prices. Prices is the way we measure how sort after a merchandise is, how valuable, how easy we can buy it, what the cost of making it versus the profit we can make in the end, and so on and so on.
So what happens when someone tries to manipulate the market, or if a government imposes a set of laws to control it? Basically nothing, the same rules apply still; however, the equation may differ a bit. If Government increases prices on something they consider to be dangerous, like tobacco, the real price stays the same. What has changed is the price plus the additional cost. If this additional cost goes to high, smuggling ensues, alternatives pops up, people start making their own. A very obvious example of this is drugs. Government has through imposed illegality and harsh penalties made sure that the price is astronomical, hence large profits can be made. In affect inviting people to produce and sell drugs. If the government happens to knock out a drug lab, prices goes up and the effect is even more criminals. This is why the war on drug never can be won. It’s a mathematical and factual impossibility.
Let’s take a fictive example as well and look at milk. Milk is one of mankind’s main sources of food, we use it for baking, quenching our thirst and lots of other things. Now, let’s assume that a couple of state-employed scientists figure out that milk is the main cause of cancer. After a couple of months of scaremongering in the media our bellowed politicians need to act and ban milk. They make it illegal and introduce a sentence of 10 years imprisonment for selling milk. This would make the milk-price quadruple or even more and since there are a lot of grandmas wanting to bake and kids that wants to drink milk, you have a huge market, and so in steps those that can and are willing to produce and sell milk on the illigal milk-market.
These sorts of distortions of the price, which it’s, all about, only change the preserved price, not the actual value or real price that would exist without the regulations and laws.
And as said, this is always true, no matter what anyone does, no matter how high the taxes goes or what the product or service in a particular case happens to be. It also applies to two very common commodities that is the main culprit behind our economic crisis and why it hasn’t and cannot end any time soon.
The two things I’m talking about are Interest rate and money.
Interest rate is actually the rate of paying back or getting back a certain percentage of money. If interest rates go up, loaning money or taking out a mortgage gets more expensive. If interest rates go down, it gets cheaper to borrow and getting into debt gets more appealing the lower the rate is. Or, in effect, when interest rates go down we tend to borrow and spend more money because saving it is in comparison a less rational choice. The opposite is also true, if interest rates go up, we tend to save the money and make more prudent choices of what to buy.
Money is just paper a certain central bank and a certain country have decided should be the way of doing trade. Instead of changing a bicycle for a carton of juice we use money. It makes trade easier and accumulated wealth can easier be stored and used for investments.
The money is printed and supplied from the central bank. The central bank lends or “gives” this money to other banks or financial institutes that in turn put it out on the market. However, and this is very important to understand, the banks does not lend out that particular amount they get from either the central bank or peoples savings, no, they lend out a lot more. This is called Fractional-reserve banking.
Fractional-reserve banking is the banking practice in which banks keep only a fraction of their deposits in reserve (as cash and other highly liquid assets) and lend out the remainder, while maintaining the simultaneous obligation to redeem all these deposits upon demand. By its nature, the practice of fractional reserve banking expands money supply (cash and demand deposits) beyond what it would otherwise be. Because of the prevalence of fractional reserve banking, the broad money supply of most countries is a multiple larger than the amount of base money created by the country's central bank. That multiple (called the money multiplier) is determined by the reserve requirement or other financial ratio requirements imposed by financial regulators.
Or, to put it in simpler terms; a bank has $100 in actual money, but lend to customers $2000-3000-4 000. As long as people don’t withdraw all their savings and pay back all their loans at the same time, the system “works”.
And, what is really important, the more people that borrow, the more customers, the more the bank can lend. For every additional $100 another couple of thousands are lend to the market.
If you understand everything written here, you also understand why this crisis emerged. What has happened is that too much money and too low interest rates have created distortions on several markets, most notably the housing and real-estate markets. So when people cannot pay back their loans, when mortgages are defaulting and the limit of spending has been reach, a contraction will happen. In fact it should happen. But in our saviors and great leaders steps and what do they do? They lower interest rates even further, throws more money into the system, borrow loads of more from other countries to spend it because the people are not spending enough.
So tell me again, how can this crisis be over?
As I said in the start, and as I have pointed out so many times, the math does not tell lies. The actual foundation cannot be changed.
Temporarily, this entire “stimulus”-madness can plaster over the basic problems; sweep them under the rug for a while. Not only will such actions eventually fail, but it will make the problems even worse.
Take a look at this little movie to further enhance your knowledge to what I have just told you. Then, to really make sure you understand, read through my text again. If you do this and you come out on the other side with this knowledge you will never trust anything any bank does ever again. You will stop listening to politicians crap and you will finally understand why our current crisis isn’t over.
The free and open market works upon a couple of very understandable rules that never change. A couple of axioms that exists no matter what anyone says or tries to do.
Firstly supply always corresponds to demand and vice versa.
Secondly 1+1=2 and 2-1=1
Thirdly, our main source of information and what it all comes down to is prices. Prices is the way we measure how sort after a merchandise is, how valuable, how easy we can buy it, what the cost of making it versus the profit we can make in the end, and so on and so on.
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Kiddy porn and UN idiots
Some 750,000 sexual predators are constantly prowling the internet in a bid to gain contact with children, a United Nations report is warning. Well, let’s take a look at that for a while…
"The number of sites devoted to child pornography worldwide is growing. The number of predators connected to the internet at any one time is estimated to be 750,000," said Najat Maala, Special Rapporteur on the child prostitution and child pornography issue. Unicef also estimates there are more than four million websites featuring minors, including those of children aged under two years.
Really? Even if so, it gets a harder and harder to find any. I remember a time when you hardly could go online looking for regular porn without stumbling upon some child porn, and if you looked for some porn at Kazaa, DC++ or similar downloading places, you were bound to find some kiddy stuff as well. Nowadays it’s almost impossible. There isn’t kiddy porn on any of the main downloading sites, not what I could find. And I cannot remember the last time I roamed the net looking for porn and happened to end up at some preteen site, it was a long time ago. And I’m a porn lover going online looking for porn all the time.
In the wake of this report, I set out to find some on purpose; it was very hard to see anything at all. The closest I could find was some semi-nude models of pretty young age, but that you can find in any clothing catalogue.
So the search engines have cleaned out most of it, regular porn sites have no links or pop-ups anymore, very little can be found at downloading sites, and if you go look for it, it’s almost impossible to find. Internets own built-in regulatory system has worked and deleted the easy access that was before.
Najat Maala noted that the age of sexual consent should not be used as an excuse for child pornographic peddlers - as it is used in places where this age limit is lower than the definition of who constitutes a minor. This is because a "child under 18 cannot be considered to be able to consent to sexual exploitation, including child pornography," she added.
I have myself always thought that that age limit is highly stupid. The legal age of sex consent varies a lot from country to country. Everything from 12y to 20y. It’s 15 in Sweden, 16 in the UK, but 18 in most American states. So what constitutes as statutory rape in the US is perfectly legal in most of Europe. And we all know that most teens start to have sex long before they turn 18. A 15y old girl choosing to pose nude in front of her webcam isn’t the same as an 11y old getting raped, but according to UN it is. Makes you wonder how this affect the statistic doesn’t it?
And look at the choice of words Najat uses. “consent to sexual exploitation” - so everyone taking picture, doing porn or such is being sexually exploited no matter what. How nice.
And doesn’t it strike you as odd that these kinds of reports is pouring out all the time, papers keep quoting them with doomsday headlines and parenting groups shout all the time, at the same time as regulations, laws and the monitoring of the internet is reaching fascist heights? You don’t need to be a conspiracy nut to see the writings on this wall.
"Images of sexually exploited children are not only growing in number but are also increasingly shocking," added Maala, who estimates that between 10,000 and 100,000 minors are victims of the child pornography network.
Between 10 000 and 100 000? Leaves a lot of roam for errors, don’t you think? And again, notice the choice of words. “the child pornography network” – it seems to imply that there is one big network out there, are they really trying to convince us of such stupidity? And what does she mean by “increasingly shocking”? Was older times pedophiles more prudent and only fiddled a little bit? Did pedophiles 50 years ago handle their victims much better and less shocking? Are we seeing the dawn of the age of super-pedophiles?
Pedophilia in itself may be bad, acting upon against youngsters makes it a crime, but when stuff comes out of the UN with very strange conclusions and sentences it is very hard to take it serious. Maybe kiddy-porn is on the rise, but I doubt it. Maybe there are more underage sex-slaves, but I doubt that too. Things was not better before in history, we are just better at detecting it nowadays, and these kinds of reports will only have two effects. 1) Make pedophiles even harder to find 2) give our enemies another reason to shut down internet.
"The number of sites devoted to child pornography worldwide is growing. The number of predators connected to the internet at any one time is estimated to be 750,000," said Najat Maala, Special Rapporteur on the child prostitution and child pornography issue. Unicef also estimates there are more than four million websites featuring minors, including those of children aged under two years.
Really? Even if so, it gets a harder and harder to find any. I remember a time when you hardly could go online looking for regular porn without stumbling upon some child porn, and if you looked for some porn at Kazaa, DC++ or similar downloading places, you were bound to find some kiddy stuff as well. Nowadays it’s almost impossible. There isn’t kiddy porn on any of the main downloading sites, not what I could find. And I cannot remember the last time I roamed the net looking for porn and happened to end up at some preteen site, it was a long time ago. And I’m a porn lover going online looking for porn all the time.
In the wake of this report, I set out to find some on purpose; it was very hard to see anything at all. The closest I could find was some semi-nude models of pretty young age, but that you can find in any clothing catalogue.
So the search engines have cleaned out most of it, regular porn sites have no links or pop-ups anymore, very little can be found at downloading sites, and if you go look for it, it’s almost impossible to find. Internets own built-in regulatory system has worked and deleted the easy access that was before.
Najat Maala noted that the age of sexual consent should not be used as an excuse for child pornographic peddlers - as it is used in places where this age limit is lower than the definition of who constitutes a minor. This is because a "child under 18 cannot be considered to be able to consent to sexual exploitation, including child pornography," she added.
I have myself always thought that that age limit is highly stupid. The legal age of sex consent varies a lot from country to country. Everything from 12y to 20y. It’s 15 in Sweden, 16 in the UK, but 18 in most American states. So what constitutes as statutory rape in the US is perfectly legal in most of Europe. And we all know that most teens start to have sex long before they turn 18. A 15y old girl choosing to pose nude in front of her webcam isn’t the same as an 11y old getting raped, but according to UN it is. Makes you wonder how this affect the statistic doesn’t it?
And look at the choice of words Najat uses. “consent to sexual exploitation” - so everyone taking picture, doing porn or such is being sexually exploited no matter what. How nice.
And doesn’t it strike you as odd that these kinds of reports is pouring out all the time, papers keep quoting them with doomsday headlines and parenting groups shout all the time, at the same time as regulations, laws and the monitoring of the internet is reaching fascist heights? You don’t need to be a conspiracy nut to see the writings on this wall.
"Images of sexually exploited children are not only growing in number but are also increasingly shocking," added Maala, who estimates that between 10,000 and 100,000 minors are victims of the child pornography network.
Between 10 000 and 100 000? Leaves a lot of roam for errors, don’t you think? And again, notice the choice of words. “the child pornography network” – it seems to imply that there is one big network out there, are they really trying to convince us of such stupidity? And what does she mean by “increasingly shocking”? Was older times pedophiles more prudent and only fiddled a little bit? Did pedophiles 50 years ago handle their victims much better and less shocking? Are we seeing the dawn of the age of super-pedophiles?
Pedophilia in itself may be bad, acting upon against youngsters makes it a crime, but when stuff comes out of the UN with very strange conclusions and sentences it is very hard to take it serious. Maybe kiddy-porn is on the rise, but I doubt it. Maybe there are more underage sex-slaves, but I doubt that too. Things was not better before in history, we are just better at detecting it nowadays, and these kinds of reports will only have two effects. 1) Make pedophiles even harder to find 2) give our enemies another reason to shut down internet.
Warmongering Barack
Oh, the nonviolent messianic figure of the Obamination loves harmony and peace so much that do you know what he is doing now? He’s sending an additional 3000 troops to Afghanistan and 1000 to Iraq which will make the total amount of fighting forces in the area higher than during his predecessor’s time at the oval office. There are also thousands of so called “contractors” doing lots of the dirty work.
This goes well together with the 14.8% increase in defense orders that made up most of the content in one of those “positive” reports we heard about from the US recently. You know, one of those reports that were quoted by brain-dead journalists as a goooood siiiign.
Yeah... this is going to end in such a happy note…
This goes well together with the 14.8% increase in defense orders that made up most of the content in one of those “positive” reports we heard about from the US recently. You know, one of those reports that were quoted by brain-dead journalists as a goooood siiiign.
Yeah... this is going to end in such a happy note…
Et tu Daily Show, et tu
This ACORN business is so funny, and it’s almost completely ignored by media. It's one of the biggest scandals I have ever seen and I'm yet to see a single article in Europe about it. Worse yet, the American press don't report either.
The old media continues to fuck up. No wonder people aren't buying newspapers or watching the news anymore. It's all crap, and can you mention a single journalist actually doing his or her job?
The old media continues to fuck up. No wonder people aren't buying newspapers or watching the news anymore. It's all crap, and can you mention a single journalist actually doing his or her job?
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| The Audacity of Hos | ||||
| ||||
Another Suicide…
Those pesky suicides among banking people is really kind of annoying aren’t they?
Earlier this year the former chief financial officer at Freddie Mac, David Kellermann, is said to have committed suicide through hanging. Then Finn W. Caspersen the former chairman and chief executive officer of Beneficial Corp, was found dead from an apparently self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head.
Now another magnate James McDonald, a prominent advisor to wealthy families as chief executive of investment management group Rockefeller & Co, died of a single gunshot wound on Sunday 13th of sept 2009. Earlier this year, Mr. McDonald was one of the directors who left the board of lender CIT Group…
Riiiight.
One is left pondering why such individuals with lots of money, power and from pretty stable family and personal histories suddenly jump of the deep end. Not that such individuals cannot be depressed or commit suicide, I’m just saying…
Old post
Earlier this year the former chief financial officer at Freddie Mac, David Kellermann, is said to have committed suicide through hanging. Then Finn W. Caspersen the former chairman and chief executive officer of Beneficial Corp, was found dead from an apparently self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head.
Now another magnate James McDonald, a prominent advisor to wealthy families as chief executive of investment management group Rockefeller & Co, died of a single gunshot wound on Sunday 13th of sept 2009. Earlier this year, Mr. McDonald was one of the directors who left the board of lender CIT Group…
Riiiight.
One is left pondering why such individuals with lots of money, power and from pretty stable family and personal histories suddenly jump of the deep end. Not that such individuals cannot be depressed or commit suicide, I’m just saying…
Old post
The mystery of idiotism
Some more mainstream economists and other clueless morons are starting to smell the housing-bubble in Sweden. Another couple of warning flares was sent up today since the prices continue to move upwards.
However fun it is to be right all the time, I cannot help wondering why they didn’t see this coming? Or did they but don’t care?
Economics is very simple. It’s not a barrey of mumboes and jumbos; it’s not magic or as hard as our enemies want us to think. It is very easy. All one really need to know is how supply and demand always coexist and how 1+1=2 and 2-1=1.
Keep those very simple facts in your head and think about what happens when the central bank makes money very cheap to financial institutes (much more money in the system) and interest rates go down to zero. Add then in how the supply of housing is scarce at the same time as the central bank does this. What’s your conclusion?
And above is during normal circumstances when we’re not in an economic crisis. The same apply, however, today, which is why despite very high unemployment and very high debts within the system - already before this madness - the same still happens.
This is the very definition of a bubble, and they have created it, most likely willfully to keep you, the people, spending money you shouldn’t have on things you in reality cannot afford.
So, now, what will happen when interest rates goes up (which they haft to) and the central bank withdraw money from the system? That’s right, crash boom and smash. If you/we/they are lucky, the defaulting levels (people not being able to pay back) just goes up a few percentage and the banks have counted on this and manage to stay floating. But think about that for a moment, is that very plausible? Is that best case scenario really how this will turn out? Are the banks really good at math and knows how to handle money?
And please remember, the housing market is not the only market, it’s not alone and standing by itself, it’s a part of the whole economic system. In other words to really find out how things are progressing with the economy and this bubbles future, one needs to take a look around. Use the same basic concept of economics above and apply it to more markets. The math doesn’t tell lies, our politicians and most of the mainstream economists always lies, or do not know what they are talking about.
Mark my words, the absolute worst thing you can do right now is taking out a mortgage and buy a house. It is not a good idea even if you get a very good deal with very low interest rates. It is the worst possible timing of buying you can ever find. However, if you are able to sell, do it. Don’t wait; the number of morons buying will decline sooner or later. It does not matter if prices goes up another couple of percent, now is the time to sell. Renting is often less costly anyway, why have all your money tied up in a house or apartment when you could make better use of them?
However fun it is to be right all the time, I cannot help wondering why they didn’t see this coming? Or did they but don’t care?
Economics is very simple. It’s not a barrey of mumboes and jumbos; it’s not magic or as hard as our enemies want us to think. It is very easy. All one really need to know is how supply and demand always coexist and how 1+1=2 and 2-1=1.
Keep those very simple facts in your head and think about what happens when the central bank makes money very cheap to financial institutes (much more money in the system) and interest rates go down to zero. Add then in how the supply of housing is scarce at the same time as the central bank does this. What’s your conclusion?
And above is during normal circumstances when we’re not in an economic crisis. The same apply, however, today, which is why despite very high unemployment and very high debts within the system - already before this madness - the same still happens.
This is the very definition of a bubble, and they have created it, most likely willfully to keep you, the people, spending money you shouldn’t have on things you in reality cannot afford.
So, now, what will happen when interest rates goes up (which they haft to) and the central bank withdraw money from the system? That’s right, crash boom and smash. If you/we/they are lucky, the defaulting levels (people not being able to pay back) just goes up a few percentage and the banks have counted on this and manage to stay floating. But think about that for a moment, is that very plausible? Is that best case scenario really how this will turn out? Are the banks really good at math and knows how to handle money?
And please remember, the housing market is not the only market, it’s not alone and standing by itself, it’s a part of the whole economic system. In other words to really find out how things are progressing with the economy and this bubbles future, one needs to take a look around. Use the same basic concept of economics above and apply it to more markets. The math doesn’t tell lies, our politicians and most of the mainstream economists always lies, or do not know what they are talking about.
Mark my words, the absolute worst thing you can do right now is taking out a mortgage and buy a house. It is not a good idea even if you get a very good deal with very low interest rates. It is the worst possible timing of buying you can ever find. However, if you are able to sell, do it. Don’t wait; the number of morons buying will decline sooner or later. It does not matter if prices goes up another couple of percent, now is the time to sell. Renting is often less costly anyway, why have all your money tied up in a house or apartment when you could make better use of them?
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
A real journalist
Before you say or think anything, I know Fox also have their own agenda, and Glenn Beck isn’t really someone I always hold up as someone to follow. Beck is sometimes wrong; he is too much of a buffoon or is clowning around more than needed. As with all news stations or journalists, one can find faults and so on.
Also, you may regard me, this news station, Beck or whatever as radical conservative scum, fascists, neoliberal asses or anything else you might think.
However, there are two things you need to acknowledge Beck for; 1) trying to find stories i.e. doing ACTUAL JOURNALISM!
2) And not being afraid to tell those stories.
This is one of very few real journalists there are. You may think he is wrong, have an agenda or trying to go over the top sometimes, but he actually do the job that all journalists should do. If all reporters and all those people claiming to want to give us news actually did their work, this world would be a much better place. In this aspect Beck is someone to follow.
Please watch and really ask yourself the same questions as Beck does, the questions being asked are relevant even if you have an opposite political view. Also, how much of this have you heard in your country? It’s not only American news stations doing the silence thing…
Also, you may regard me, this news station, Beck or whatever as radical conservative scum, fascists, neoliberal asses or anything else you might think.
However, there are two things you need to acknowledge Beck for; 1) trying to find stories i.e. doing ACTUAL JOURNALISM!
2) And not being afraid to tell those stories.
This is one of very few real journalists there are. You may think he is wrong, have an agenda or trying to go over the top sometimes, but he actually do the job that all journalists should do. If all reporters and all those people claiming to want to give us news actually did their work, this world would be a much better place. In this aspect Beck is someone to follow.
Please watch and really ask yourself the same questions as Beck does, the questions being asked are relevant even if you have an opposite political view. Also, how much of this have you heard in your country? It’s not only American news stations doing the silence thing…
The true story of our appending doom – Part I
During the last two hundred years or so, there has been a massive transference of belief. We have gone from being a God-fearing people living under the assumption that the aristocracy and hierarchy is the natural order of things, over to believing in equal rights and democracy, but then back again to the same principle of monocracy.
The awakening that came with the industrial revolution and capitalism gave us both the means to produce enough for all humans and the morality of individual freedom. But out of the golden age of humankind we slowly, but surely, headed back to those structures of collectivism and autocracy we almost, for a brief moment, had left behind.
The power structure today has other names and within resides other titles, but the inherent evil as well as the strive for power, control and money is the same. The old monarchs started giant building projects to keep the populace with jobs, give people a sense of pride and to fulfill some phallic dream of that particular ruler. Today’s monarchs do the exact same thing, only now disguised under the “consent” of the people whom have voted, directly or indirectly, for that particular project.
Whereas a king would have built an opera openly for the court and elitists, today’s elected rulers also build similar structures while subsidizing the price slightly with the notion that the common man might be let in. However, clothing rules, high unemployment and the social structure makes the same elitists and elected officials (the court) the main visitors, but to a lower price since “everyone” is paying for it.
In every civilization, there is a very thin upper branch of elitists who are concerned with questions of morality, truth, justice, and the divine plan. In other words, why we exist and who is supposed to do what to whom in order to gain the perfect society. Historically, such “thinkers” have tended to believe these ultimate and conjured up ethical values have a claim on every man. ‘For the common good’ – is today the normal phrased used to protect this elitist way of thinking. However slim the top dogs group is, they are always accompanied with a tail of followers that support and argue for the agenda trickling down. Ruling all of them are politicians or the monarch. Loosely tied to this larger group of top elitists and elitist-wannabees are another bunch of people whom, to an large degree, is dependent on them in order to gain the upper hand in different areas such as business or religion. All in all, this entire cluster of elitists, magnates and “thinkers” make up the horde of people I usually entitle ‘the enemy class’.
This ‘class’ is consistent of those that not only sit on much of the power, but also are very dependent of each other. Politicians need journalists to write about their projects and well-meaning programs, journalists need politicians to gain more readers or trick more viewers to tune in at evening. Industry leaders need subsidized land to build factories on in addition to many other things politicians can hand them, courtesy of tax money. Politicians on the other hand need more jobs they can claim their little agreement with the magnate in question produced and rubbing elbows with other high and mighty is a good way of assure their own future if they chose (or get forced) to leave politics. All the “thinkers” i.e. university lecturers, story-tellers, philosophers, economists and so forth are often enough employed by government or the magnates which any monkey can figure out makes them accomplices. The strings in-between are many more, for instance marriage to secure titles, money and peace are as common today as back in the middle ages, and there are many more, but to write about all of those would take entire books to unravel.
What people need to understand about this little expose into the power elite structure is three things:
1) The conspiracists have it right, at least to a point.
The power elitists exist and they do have an agenda, they do conspire to gain benefits, and they a lot to lose when found out. However, this does not really mean it’s always a master plan behind it; it’s more how the structure is built. This power in the hands of our rulers comes with the system and so does the means to contain and keep that power.
2) Keeping the Authority.
These people, although, as said, not really deliberately planning for it, will always use all their authority to keep the system as it is. This means that it does not matter if the rulers happen to be left or right in politics, it does not matter who is Prime Mentalist or which news station is reporting what, the status que is kept in any case.
3) The ones who really are to blame are the voters.
This because most voters buy the sales-pitch the elitists masterfully put together. Vote right and you get lower taxes and lower benefits, the opposite if you vote left, but what always stays the same is the power structure. And over time all parties becomes state-lovers, or rather power-lovers. A party needs to stay in power to have power consequently all political parties need to make good use of the power the voters so willingly hands them.
In conclusion you are fooled. Fooled to believe your vote matters, it doesn’t. Fooled to believe it matters what face is selling you the lies. It may be a black man, a Hispanic woman or a rich white guy, it don’t matter. Who sits in office only affects those closest to power and there may be a prestige thing, but for regular Joe’s, it hardly has any impact. You are also fooled into believing in things like religion, war on drugs, war on terror or that equality only can be created through and off the governments say so.
They have even managed to convince people that monitoring and controlling the internet will save children from being molested or that hunting down youngsters downloading movies is a way of saving business. The lies being told from the enemy class is very often simple to see and understand, which means they need to be covertly sold through notions of solidarity, justice and rights-issues. There isn’t a single government project that cannot be defended with reasons of “saving the poor” or “helping the elderly”, and you, the voters buy it all.
In the broadest meaning of the word “socialism” that is the road we are on, but more accurately it’s a lighter form of fascism. Big corporations mixed with power seeking politicians and all their friends in-twined within an oligarchy aimed to contain and keep the power is very close to the economic model of fascism. So all that’s really needed is that racial and nationalistic vein, and, of course, you can find lots of that too. Just stop and think about it for a moment, what are all politicians really saying all the time? It’s us against them is what they are saying. And it doesn’t need to be as obvious as white against black or Arians against Jews; it can be females against males, one school against the other or even your neighbor against you. And nationalism is always present in one form or the other.
It’s like every politician wants to be advocating capitalism, but with large doses of socialism injected now and again, everything designed to keep the power structure intact.
And how do they manage to keep it all together? With the help of FEAR.
Fear is the main driving force behind everything you let them do to you. And the government is always the solution. There are pedophiles online? Government to the rescue. Red Bull may or may not cause problems? Let's bann it. You cannot find a job? Government can fix that. Terrorist attack? The government can throw some bombs around and create new laws to make you safe. The economy crashing? The government has an endless supply of money to save us all. Too many Muslims in your town living on benefits? Vote for me, I’ll stop them at the border. And aren’t Muslims all fanatics wanting to bomb you? Let’s build a mosque for them showing our understanding at the same time we complain about their child-brides and bomb their native countries. How about those industry leaders? Aren’t they rich enough and keep making all people unemployed? Let’s give them free stuff, cut their taxes and help them out at the same time as we complain about them to the media.
Politicians play Pied Piper to the masses. And people see no danger in following, thinking only to receive “free” goodies from the State. Always. Forever. The never ending supply of free stuff handing down to us from above is celebrated by media as “progressive”, big business is jumping along singing to the tune and everything is sold with pink shimmering clouds of happiness while the alternatives are painted black and the scare-mongering is drummed out by “thinkers” and journalists. All the while we are all headed for that abyss up ahead, cheerfully we dance closer and closer. Some people fall over, another economic crash happens, another terrorist attack hits, but we continue to swallow the lies, even cheering our elitists on while more people drop down towards their doom.
Can we stop?
Do we want to stop?
If you really ask those kinds of questions and really answer them truthfully, the answer is always NO. This is the background reason, the main foundation and the continuous predicament that gave us the great depression, both world wars and all the other stupidities since then. This is also the main reason why we are in a recession and why there will continue to be recessions and why it will only keep getting worse and worse.
Sometimes we will take one or two steps in another direction, but that’s only temporarily.
How many of you can really claim to be free today? How many rights do you really have that no one can take away from you? I cannot think of a single one, so, in essence we are mindless drones at best, pure slaves willing to die at the hands of the enemy class at worse.
The awakening that came with the industrial revolution and capitalism gave us both the means to produce enough for all humans and the morality of individual freedom. But out of the golden age of humankind we slowly, but surely, headed back to those structures of collectivism and autocracy we almost, for a brief moment, had left behind.
The power structure today has other names and within resides other titles, but the inherent evil as well as the strive for power, control and money is the same. The old monarchs started giant building projects to keep the populace with jobs, give people a sense of pride and to fulfill some phallic dream of that particular ruler. Today’s monarchs do the exact same thing, only now disguised under the “consent” of the people whom have voted, directly or indirectly, for that particular project.
Whereas a king would have built an opera openly for the court and elitists, today’s elected rulers also build similar structures while subsidizing the price slightly with the notion that the common man might be let in. However, clothing rules, high unemployment and the social structure makes the same elitists and elected officials (the court) the main visitors, but to a lower price since “everyone” is paying for it.
In every civilization, there is a very thin upper branch of elitists who are concerned with questions of morality, truth, justice, and the divine plan. In other words, why we exist and who is supposed to do what to whom in order to gain the perfect society. Historically, such “thinkers” have tended to believe these ultimate and conjured up ethical values have a claim on every man. ‘For the common good’ – is today the normal phrased used to protect this elitist way of thinking. However slim the top dogs group is, they are always accompanied with a tail of followers that support and argue for the agenda trickling down. Ruling all of them are politicians or the monarch. Loosely tied to this larger group of top elitists and elitist-wannabees are another bunch of people whom, to an large degree, is dependent on them in order to gain the upper hand in different areas such as business or religion. All in all, this entire cluster of elitists, magnates and “thinkers” make up the horde of people I usually entitle ‘the enemy class’.
This ‘class’ is consistent of those that not only sit on much of the power, but also are very dependent of each other. Politicians need journalists to write about their projects and well-meaning programs, journalists need politicians to gain more readers or trick more viewers to tune in at evening. Industry leaders need subsidized land to build factories on in addition to many other things politicians can hand them, courtesy of tax money. Politicians on the other hand need more jobs they can claim their little agreement with the magnate in question produced and rubbing elbows with other high and mighty is a good way of assure their own future if they chose (or get forced) to leave politics. All the “thinkers” i.e. university lecturers, story-tellers, philosophers, economists and so forth are often enough employed by government or the magnates which any monkey can figure out makes them accomplices. The strings in-between are many more, for instance marriage to secure titles, money and peace are as common today as back in the middle ages, and there are many more, but to write about all of those would take entire books to unravel.
What people need to understand about this little expose into the power elite structure is three things:
1) The conspiracists have it right, at least to a point.
The power elitists exist and they do have an agenda, they do conspire to gain benefits, and they a lot to lose when found out. However, this does not really mean it’s always a master plan behind it; it’s more how the structure is built. This power in the hands of our rulers comes with the system and so does the means to contain and keep that power.
2) Keeping the Authority.
These people, although, as said, not really deliberately planning for it, will always use all their authority to keep the system as it is. This means that it does not matter if the rulers happen to be left or right in politics, it does not matter who is Prime Mentalist or which news station is reporting what, the status que is kept in any case.
3) The ones who really are to blame are the voters.
This because most voters buy the sales-pitch the elitists masterfully put together. Vote right and you get lower taxes and lower benefits, the opposite if you vote left, but what always stays the same is the power structure. And over time all parties becomes state-lovers, or rather power-lovers. A party needs to stay in power to have power consequently all political parties need to make good use of the power the voters so willingly hands them.
In conclusion you are fooled. Fooled to believe your vote matters, it doesn’t. Fooled to believe it matters what face is selling you the lies. It may be a black man, a Hispanic woman or a rich white guy, it don’t matter. Who sits in office only affects those closest to power and there may be a prestige thing, but for regular Joe’s, it hardly has any impact. You are also fooled into believing in things like religion, war on drugs, war on terror or that equality only can be created through and off the governments say so.
They have even managed to convince people that monitoring and controlling the internet will save children from being molested or that hunting down youngsters downloading movies is a way of saving business. The lies being told from the enemy class is very often simple to see and understand, which means they need to be covertly sold through notions of solidarity, justice and rights-issues. There isn’t a single government project that cannot be defended with reasons of “saving the poor” or “helping the elderly”, and you, the voters buy it all.
In the broadest meaning of the word “socialism” that is the road we are on, but more accurately it’s a lighter form of fascism. Big corporations mixed with power seeking politicians and all their friends in-twined within an oligarchy aimed to contain and keep the power is very close to the economic model of fascism. So all that’s really needed is that racial and nationalistic vein, and, of course, you can find lots of that too. Just stop and think about it for a moment, what are all politicians really saying all the time? It’s us against them is what they are saying. And it doesn’t need to be as obvious as white against black or Arians against Jews; it can be females against males, one school against the other or even your neighbor against you. And nationalism is always present in one form or the other.
It’s like every politician wants to be advocating capitalism, but with large doses of socialism injected now and again, everything designed to keep the power structure intact.
And how do they manage to keep it all together? With the help of FEAR.
Fear is the main driving force behind everything you let them do to you. And the government is always the solution. There are pedophiles online? Government to the rescue. Red Bull may or may not cause problems? Let's bann it. You cannot find a job? Government can fix that. Terrorist attack? The government can throw some bombs around and create new laws to make you safe. The economy crashing? The government has an endless supply of money to save us all. Too many Muslims in your town living on benefits? Vote for me, I’ll stop them at the border. And aren’t Muslims all fanatics wanting to bomb you? Let’s build a mosque for them showing our understanding at the same time we complain about their child-brides and bomb their native countries. How about those industry leaders? Aren’t they rich enough and keep making all people unemployed? Let’s give them free stuff, cut their taxes and help them out at the same time as we complain about them to the media.
Politicians play Pied Piper to the masses. And people see no danger in following, thinking only to receive “free” goodies from the State. Always. Forever. The never ending supply of free stuff handing down to us from above is celebrated by media as “progressive”, big business is jumping along singing to the tune and everything is sold with pink shimmering clouds of happiness while the alternatives are painted black and the scare-mongering is drummed out by “thinkers” and journalists. All the while we are all headed for that abyss up ahead, cheerfully we dance closer and closer. Some people fall over, another economic crash happens, another terrorist attack hits, but we continue to swallow the lies, even cheering our elitists on while more people drop down towards their doom.
Can we stop?
Do we want to stop?
If you really ask those kinds of questions and really answer them truthfully, the answer is always NO. This is the background reason, the main foundation and the continuous predicament that gave us the great depression, both world wars and all the other stupidities since then. This is also the main reason why we are in a recession and why there will continue to be recessions and why it will only keep getting worse and worse.
Sometimes we will take one or two steps in another direction, but that’s only temporarily.
How many of you can really claim to be free today? How many rights do you really have that no one can take away from you? I cannot think of a single one, so, in essence we are mindless drones at best, pure slaves willing to die at the hands of the enemy class at worse.
Monday, September 14, 2009
another pretty smart person
I still thinks this man is to positive, but this is still yet another voice saying and warning about what's to come...
I want to sell sex again
I have been thinking about this for a long while now, I even got as far in my plans some years ago that I started a website and planed my price-list. Now I’m contemplating it again and if someone wants, come with an offer.
I have actually sold sex before, and bought it since I together with several of my old girlfriends bought sex from each other. I have also offered some compensation or demanded it after a couple of one-nighters, just for the fun of it.
Apparently as few as 1.7% of people between 16 and 25 in Sweden have sold sex. I find this kind of a boring number; it should be a lot higher. Come on people! It’s a good way to earn extra money, get to know interesting people and hand out a couple of fuck-you’s to the man. And if you are a student, ignore those stupid loans, get a job at a strip-club or sell yourself online instead, much better and no loan hanging over your head in the future.
A law that tells you that your body and your choices belong to the state is an unjust stupidity you never should obey.
I urge you all to pay your husband, wife, boyfriend or casual partner. It can be a penny or two; the gesture is the important part. I would also urge you to do what I have done on a couple of occasions, go to the police and confess to this “crime”. If all you people out there that believe, as I do, that who you chose to fuck with and under which circumstances this happens, is your business, and no one else’s, do this all the time, the oppressive and contra productive law becomes useless.
So please remember, insist on payment for every sex-act, no matter what age you are or who your partner is.
I have actually sold sex before, and bought it since I together with several of my old girlfriends bought sex from each other. I have also offered some compensation or demanded it after a couple of one-nighters, just for the fun of it.
Apparently as few as 1.7% of people between 16 and 25 in Sweden have sold sex. I find this kind of a boring number; it should be a lot higher. Come on people! It’s a good way to earn extra money, get to know interesting people and hand out a couple of fuck-you’s to the man. And if you are a student, ignore those stupid loans, get a job at a strip-club or sell yourself online instead, much better and no loan hanging over your head in the future.
A law that tells you that your body and your choices belong to the state is an unjust stupidity you never should obey.
I urge you all to pay your husband, wife, boyfriend or casual partner. It can be a penny or two; the gesture is the important part. I would also urge you to do what I have done on a couple of occasions, go to the police and confess to this “crime”. If all you people out there that believe, as I do, that who you chose to fuck with and under which circumstances this happens, is your business, and no one else’s, do this all the time, the oppressive and contra productive law becomes useless.
So please remember, insist on payment for every sex-act, no matter what age you are or who your partner is.
China VS USA - can only end in one way...
I have been looking for more protectionist measures being taken, that’s the normal way for our elitists to react to major economic problems, and so even if protectionism have been increasing during this crisis, the actions taken haven’t yet reached those levels I expected. However, one can always count on the Obamination to make a bad situation worse.
European and Asian markets fell on Monday, shaken by news of a trade dispute between the US and China over tariffs on tyres. The US decision to impose trade penalties on Chinese tyres infuriated Beijing, which condemned the move as protectionist and said it violated global trade rules. I think this is fantastic fun. It’s idiotic, stupid and very dangerous, but hilarious none the less.
And China, feeling that they had to retaliate with their own stupidity announced some mumbo jumbo about US auto, and chicken imports. We already know that the French idiots are just looking for an excuse to “protect” their industries, and since there are a lot of mad people ruling all over, this China US thing might very well be the start of the next downhill spiral.
As I have written before, the similarities between this depression and the “great one” 80 years ago, are staggering, so more protectionism was expected and it will continue to grow, but will not be really bad until next year when the reality is starting to sink in and our politicians feel the urge to do something loony again.
Let’s recap for a moment shall we. China is the main lender to the US, and China is the main purchaser of US treasury bonds hence very important to the US economy and without China its very unlikely that the American administration could have launch such a massive deficit to “stimulate” the economy. Most of the Chinese stake in the US is in the currency, the USD. Currently China has started to diverse itself from dollars, buying other currencies and gold instead. So far this move has been kind of slow to not upset the world markets or the value of the dollar, however, now appears this “thank you” from the US government...
But the Obamination isn’t really happy only pissing of a billion plus Chinese, he also continues his campaign against the financial market. Blaming greed and calling for more restrictions. That his entire staff consists of people direct from Wall Street whom are profiting from the crisis is, however, a silence factor not to speak of. That too much government and too many regulations created the crisis isn’t either mentioned. And while the small dealer Madoff goes to jail, the biggest crocks roam free.
Barack Obama is already the worst president in US history. From one madman to an even worse one.
Yes, our future looks very interesting indeed…
European and Asian markets fell on Monday, shaken by news of a trade dispute between the US and China over tariffs on tyres. The US decision to impose trade penalties on Chinese tyres infuriated Beijing, which condemned the move as protectionist and said it violated global trade rules. I think this is fantastic fun. It’s idiotic, stupid and very dangerous, but hilarious none the less.
And China, feeling that they had to retaliate with their own stupidity announced some mumbo jumbo about US auto, and chicken imports. We already know that the French idiots are just looking for an excuse to “protect” their industries, and since there are a lot of mad people ruling all over, this China US thing might very well be the start of the next downhill spiral.
As I have written before, the similarities between this depression and the “great one” 80 years ago, are staggering, so more protectionism was expected and it will continue to grow, but will not be really bad until next year when the reality is starting to sink in and our politicians feel the urge to do something loony again.
Let’s recap for a moment shall we. China is the main lender to the US, and China is the main purchaser of US treasury bonds hence very important to the US economy and without China its very unlikely that the American administration could have launch such a massive deficit to “stimulate” the economy. Most of the Chinese stake in the US is in the currency, the USD. Currently China has started to diverse itself from dollars, buying other currencies and gold instead. So far this move has been kind of slow to not upset the world markets or the value of the dollar, however, now appears this “thank you” from the US government...
But the Obamination isn’t really happy only pissing of a billion plus Chinese, he also continues his campaign against the financial market. Blaming greed and calling for more restrictions. That his entire staff consists of people direct from Wall Street whom are profiting from the crisis is, however, a silence factor not to speak of. That too much government and too many regulations created the crisis isn’t either mentioned. And while the small dealer Madoff goes to jail, the biggest crocks roam free.
Barack Obama is already the worst president in US history. From one madman to an even worse one.
Yes, our future looks very interesting indeed…
Sunday, September 13, 2009
44 is the magic number
Apparently the number of breast cancer cases among females is going up among those being pregnant. A main reason for this, being stated, is higher age, today, for women when having babies then previous generations. This according to Swedish newspapers that is quoting an ongoing investigation being made by Karolinska University Hospital and the Regional Oncologic Center. I’m too tired and a bit sick from some flu to do a really in-depth investigation into these claims, but I hope someone else does it. However, only looking at the presented data we can draw some interesting facts. Bear in mind, I’m no doctor; I’m only looking at the presented data.
The survey have looked at 16 620 cases of breast cancer between the ages of 15-40 under a 40-year period (1963-2002), from which 1 161 was extracted as cases emerging under or during a period of 2 years after being pregnant. According to what we are being told the number have increased from 16 out of 100 000 to a staggering 37 during the mentioned period.
Firstly, if you got scared from those numbers or the headline in the papers, you should know that it’s very uncommon for females below 40y old to attract breast cancer. Less than 10% of all cancer cases are younger than 45 years old. In other words, the older you get the higher risk of breast cancer. This also states that the older you are when doing the nasty in order to produce an offspring; the more are you at risk. Not because of the child bearing, but because of the age thing.
I also read through the summary of the report and strangely enough, the number of cancer cases among pregnant females and directly after the pregnancy is significantly less than women at the same age not carrying around a lump in the stomach. Mm… why didn’t the news tell us that?
This, if true, is great news and if you wanna reduce the risk of cancer the report seems to suggest that getting and staying pregnant is the best remedy. Although it should be pointed out that it’s harder to diagnose during pregnancy, so there is a margin of error. However, we can state that even if there has been an increase in total, it is still better to be baking in the oven, then not. Or, in my interpretation, we need to fuck much much more.
But back to the presented numbers we can also conclude that the risk, 7 years ago, mathematically speaking, is:
37/100 000= 0.037%
This increase from 0.016% - presumably back in 1963
But couldn’t the increased risk be dependent on, oh, let’s say, better equipment? Better understanding of the sickness? Better trained doctors? Better information available? It is hard to imagine that we under 40 years haven’t developed some or all of this things into something better. Although, we are talking public healthcare, so one never knows… But I couldn’t find out if such things were included in this survey, which makes me conclude they were not taking into account, and if they weren’t; totally speaking, I would state that this concluded risk-increase is far less.
In other words:
If you wanna reduce the risk of breast cancer, get pregnant.
The increased risk, if my assumption holds, is not as big as we are being told
If you want to minimize the risk of getting breast cancer, better not go beyond 45 years old. So for you ladies out there at the horrifying age of 44, you might wanna start looking at euthanasia, otherwise you may die…
The survey have looked at 16 620 cases of breast cancer between the ages of 15-40 under a 40-year period (1963-2002), from which 1 161 was extracted as cases emerging under or during a period of 2 years after being pregnant. According to what we are being told the number have increased from 16 out of 100 000 to a staggering 37 during the mentioned period.
Firstly, if you got scared from those numbers or the headline in the papers, you should know that it’s very uncommon for females below 40y old to attract breast cancer. Less than 10% of all cancer cases are younger than 45 years old. In other words, the older you get the higher risk of breast cancer. This also states that the older you are when doing the nasty in order to produce an offspring; the more are you at risk. Not because of the child bearing, but because of the age thing.
I also read through the summary of the report and strangely enough, the number of cancer cases among pregnant females and directly after the pregnancy is significantly less than women at the same age not carrying around a lump in the stomach. Mm… why didn’t the news tell us that?
This, if true, is great news and if you wanna reduce the risk of cancer the report seems to suggest that getting and staying pregnant is the best remedy. Although it should be pointed out that it’s harder to diagnose during pregnancy, so there is a margin of error. However, we can state that even if there has been an increase in total, it is still better to be baking in the oven, then not. Or, in my interpretation, we need to fuck much much more.
But back to the presented numbers we can also conclude that the risk, 7 years ago, mathematically speaking, is:
37/100 000= 0.037%
This increase from 0.016% - presumably back in 1963
But couldn’t the increased risk be dependent on, oh, let’s say, better equipment? Better understanding of the sickness? Better trained doctors? Better information available? It is hard to imagine that we under 40 years haven’t developed some or all of this things into something better. Although, we are talking public healthcare, so one never knows… But I couldn’t find out if such things were included in this survey, which makes me conclude they were not taking into account, and if they weren’t; totally speaking, I would state that this concluded risk-increase is far less.
In other words:
If you wanna reduce the risk of breast cancer, get pregnant.
The increased risk, if my assumption holds, is not as big as we are being told
If you want to minimize the risk of getting breast cancer, better not go beyond 45 years old. So for you ladies out there at the horrifying age of 44, you might wanna start looking at euthanasia, otherwise you may die…
You are going to die! Part XXXI
A Catholic who believed his prayers were answered when he was rescued from a lift was killed when he went to church to give thanks and the stone altar fell on him.
Gunther Link, 45, died instantly as he was crushed under the ancient 860lb (200-kilo) monument at the Weinhaus Church yard in Vienna-Währing. Link's body was found by parishioners attending Mass the next day after he had been reported missing by his cousin.
Police spokesman Roman Hahslinger said foul play had been ruled out and fingerprints on the shrine had revealed the man had touched it before it fell.
This is just another way to go. At any moment your time may be up. Falling ice-blocks from houses, plunging down the stairs, hitting your head against the pavement and drowning in a puddle of water are just some other hilarious and pretty common ways to get to shake hands with the Grim Reaper. No matter what effigy you pray to, no matter what country, no matter what your age, you are going to die. It’s just a matter of time, place and how.
Just make sure, before you go, that you sell those stacks of gay amputee porn so not causing your spouse or mother to have a heart attack.
Gunther Link, 45, died instantly as he was crushed under the ancient 860lb (200-kilo) monument at the Weinhaus Church yard in Vienna-Währing. Link's body was found by parishioners attending Mass the next day after he had been reported missing by his cousin.
Police spokesman Roman Hahslinger said foul play had been ruled out and fingerprints on the shrine had revealed the man had touched it before it fell.
This is just another way to go. At any moment your time may be up. Falling ice-blocks from houses, plunging down the stairs, hitting your head against the pavement and drowning in a puddle of water are just some other hilarious and pretty common ways to get to shake hands with the Grim Reaper. No matter what effigy you pray to, no matter what country, no matter what your age, you are going to die. It’s just a matter of time, place and how.
Just make sure, before you go, that you sell those stacks of gay amputee porn so not causing your spouse or mother to have a heart attack.
Saturday, September 12, 2009
Banksters as genital warts
It always disturbs me when journalists write about something and only report about the, from above, given explanation. It’s like having genital warts but ignoring both the reason for it and what to do about it. Instead of rubbing on some cream, take the pills, visit a doctor or start an investigation why those warts popped up in the first place, you only conclude you have warts. In the meanwhile you keep on doing unmentionable things to prepubescent Altar Boys, to the mailbox or whatever rocks your boat, leaving the disease to work its magic throughout your body.
One such example of ignoring the surrounding facts, the real background story and the real solution to a problem is when papers write about our current economic depression. The people that are supposed to monitor the elitists, report about wrongdoers in the administration and give the general public knowledge on what’s going on, are instead refusing to dig into stories. Even worse than that, they hide facts, they cover up the really juicy bits and refuse to give any alternative explanation.
I have already covered several such examples, but there are more of those that need to be looked at.
For example one Swedish paper writes about the Lehman Brothers today and, among other things, claims that when this financial institutes crashed it was the real beginning that kicked off our economic predicament. This is a false statement, but clearly one of those fabrications our enemies wants us to believe in since I have read similar cover stories in other papers. The problems where created long before and so many events took place before Lehman brothers went down, that this particular event is rather a miniscule stone on a road filled with gaping holes.
The paper in question also mentions AIG, Goldman Sachs and quotes Timothy Geithner, the US treasury secretary, one of those behind the plot to save AIG, and one of those behind letting Lehman Brothers go out of business. This wasn’t strange or had anything to do making tough choices; it was pure greed-calculations, nothing else. Look at the people in the Obama administration, its pure Wall Street and do you know from what firm these lobbyists mainly come? Goldman Sachs. How about that?
Henry Paulsen, former CEO of Goldman Sachs, was the one that decided to let Bern Stearns fail, a major competitor of Goldman Sachs. Lloyd Blankfein, Chief executive of Goldman Sachs, together with Henry Paulsen then decided to bail-out AIG for $85bn, the biggest payout of $12.9bn from AIG after this bail-out went to… *drum roll*… Goldman Sachs! And this just a couple of days after the same people deciding to not bail-out Lehman Brothers, the biggest competitor of Goldman Sachs.
Steven Friedman, former chairman Goldman Sachs, now at Federal Reserve, had the task of overseeing Goldman Sachs. And do you know what Friedman did during his “overseeing”? He bought 52000 shares in this company he was elected to oversee, and earned $3 million in the process. Mark Paterson, Goldman Sachs lobbyist, is chief of staff of Timothy Geithner. And the list just goes on and on.
In how many papers have you read this?
But this scheme does not stop there, Goldman Sachs got a huge bail-out from the Government they paid back just months later, because suddenly, with less competitors and tunneled money from AIG they were making money again.
And this is just one example, there are many more and no journalists are writing or talking about it. This is theft, robbery, and systematic fraud. It’s the biggest bank-heist of all time and it makes criminals like Bernard Madoff looking like a shoplifter.
You cannot make this stuff up, it goes beyond cartoonish. No arch-enemy of any superhero could have come up with a more sinister plan. And this is the main reason for fiscal conservatives, libertarians and lots of other groups going out in masses rallying. People that haven’t demonstrated their entire life are waking up.
You might think this is bad, and it is, but the worst thing about this whole scheme isn’t the frauds or the thievery, it’s not even the fact that American taxpayers are writing the checks. The worst thing about this whole mess is that the basic faults, the very foundation of this crisis still remains. There are still different swaps going on. Financial institutes are still buying troubled assets, exchanging defaulting housing loans and propping up each other’s stock values and this time around it’s much worse since all that money comes from the government and it’s only consistent of air. And this is why the stock market is going up! Its phantom money - the American government has used the printing machine to bail-out their banking buddies and the banksters in turn are creating massive amounts of fictive values while the main problems still lurks behind the scene. It’s a bubble of massive proportions that WILL BURST. The math doesn’t tell lies.
If you don’t believe me, take a look at the US banks that have failed so far, well over 80 of them by now. Every single one of those banks have been written down (sometimes with over 50%!) because there is only air in the numbers, no real value. And how many of these tricksters and fraudulent thieves are incarcerated? None of them! In the meanwhile the government is overcrowding jails with harden criminals like pot-smokers and file-sharers. To me it’s a wonder that the American people isn’t shooting at officials, storming the capital building and stringing up banksters on lampposts all along Wall Street.
As this crisis rages on, which it does, no matter what journalists write or politicians say, sooner or later those next crashes will hit and when they do, no matter if it’s a month or a year from now, it will change the US and the World forever, but you will not see any reporters say that, because they are too busy listening to the man.
One such example of ignoring the surrounding facts, the real background story and the real solution to a problem is when papers write about our current economic depression. The people that are supposed to monitor the elitists, report about wrongdoers in the administration and give the general public knowledge on what’s going on, are instead refusing to dig into stories. Even worse than that, they hide facts, they cover up the really juicy bits and refuse to give any alternative explanation.
I have already covered several such examples, but there are more of those that need to be looked at.
For example one Swedish paper writes about the Lehman Brothers today and, among other things, claims that when this financial institutes crashed it was the real beginning that kicked off our economic predicament. This is a false statement, but clearly one of those fabrications our enemies wants us to believe in since I have read similar cover stories in other papers. The problems where created long before and so many events took place before Lehman brothers went down, that this particular event is rather a miniscule stone on a road filled with gaping holes.
The paper in question also mentions AIG, Goldman Sachs and quotes Timothy Geithner, the US treasury secretary, one of those behind the plot to save AIG, and one of those behind letting Lehman Brothers go out of business. This wasn’t strange or had anything to do making tough choices; it was pure greed-calculations, nothing else. Look at the people in the Obama administration, its pure Wall Street and do you know from what firm these lobbyists mainly come? Goldman Sachs. How about that?
Henry Paulsen, former CEO of Goldman Sachs, was the one that decided to let Bern Stearns fail, a major competitor of Goldman Sachs. Lloyd Blankfein, Chief executive of Goldman Sachs, together with Henry Paulsen then decided to bail-out AIG for $85bn, the biggest payout of $12.9bn from AIG after this bail-out went to… *drum roll*… Goldman Sachs! And this just a couple of days after the same people deciding to not bail-out Lehman Brothers, the biggest competitor of Goldman Sachs.
Steven Friedman, former chairman Goldman Sachs, now at Federal Reserve, had the task of overseeing Goldman Sachs. And do you know what Friedman did during his “overseeing”? He bought 52000 shares in this company he was elected to oversee, and earned $3 million in the process. Mark Paterson, Goldman Sachs lobbyist, is chief of staff of Timothy Geithner. And the list just goes on and on.
In how many papers have you read this?
But this scheme does not stop there, Goldman Sachs got a huge bail-out from the Government they paid back just months later, because suddenly, with less competitors and tunneled money from AIG they were making money again.
And this is just one example, there are many more and no journalists are writing or talking about it. This is theft, robbery, and systematic fraud. It’s the biggest bank-heist of all time and it makes criminals like Bernard Madoff looking like a shoplifter.
You cannot make this stuff up, it goes beyond cartoonish. No arch-enemy of any superhero could have come up with a more sinister plan. And this is the main reason for fiscal conservatives, libertarians and lots of other groups going out in masses rallying. People that haven’t demonstrated their entire life are waking up.
You might think this is bad, and it is, but the worst thing about this whole scheme isn’t the frauds or the thievery, it’s not even the fact that American taxpayers are writing the checks. The worst thing about this whole mess is that the basic faults, the very foundation of this crisis still remains. There are still different swaps going on. Financial institutes are still buying troubled assets, exchanging defaulting housing loans and propping up each other’s stock values and this time around it’s much worse since all that money comes from the government and it’s only consistent of air. And this is why the stock market is going up! Its phantom money - the American government has used the printing machine to bail-out their banking buddies and the banksters in turn are creating massive amounts of fictive values while the main problems still lurks behind the scene. It’s a bubble of massive proportions that WILL BURST. The math doesn’t tell lies.
If you don’t believe me, take a look at the US banks that have failed so far, well over 80 of them by now. Every single one of those banks have been written down (sometimes with over 50%!) because there is only air in the numbers, no real value. And how many of these tricksters and fraudulent thieves are incarcerated? None of them! In the meanwhile the government is overcrowding jails with harden criminals like pot-smokers and file-sharers. To me it’s a wonder that the American people isn’t shooting at officials, storming the capital building and stringing up banksters on lampposts all along Wall Street.
As this crisis rages on, which it does, no matter what journalists write or politicians say, sooner or later those next crashes will hit and when they do, no matter if it’s a month or a year from now, it will change the US and the World forever, but you will not see any reporters say that, because they are too busy listening to the man.
Thursday, September 10, 2009
The terrorists are winning
Today is 9/11 and in remembrance of the victims of the World Trade Center we are today much less free, more under control and heading towards total autocracy. In reverence of those onboard the planes more wars have been fought, more regulations been passed and travel restrictions are tighter than ever. To the memory of the police and firemen that died at ground zero, new taxes have been imposed; surveillance is closing in on total, and governments everywhere is monitoring everything the people does. We evoke the memory of victims of terror by hindering and stopping humankind’s most fantastic invention, the internet.
Millions of people have died in the aftermath of 9/11, the terrorists resolve has undoubtedly been strengthen, and there is no shortage of new recruits to kill more innocent people. We have given up much of our democratic rights, and hardly any of our basic freedom remains. In effect, one can say, with absolute certainly, that the terrorists are winning.
There are a lot of people believing that 9/11 was a staged attack, possibly by the American government, some powerful banking people or the CIA. I don’t really believe that, the risk would be too great, too many people would know about it, and there is too much evidence showing this was not the case. However, George W Chimp had falling approval rating, and those in power got the perfect excuse to impose a fascist’s wet dream. So in either case, normal people and democracy, as a whole, ended up losing.
The terrorists are beating us. We are losing the war.
America has done what the terrorists wanted. It has become less free. Only the patriot act is a violation of unprecedented degree, and the US are becoming more and more like the police state that we are being told terrorists like. Similar draconian laws are being passed in Europe and it seems like anything can be excused as long as it is disguised as a “war on terror”. Already totalitarian states like China or Iran is claiming “terrorism” as soon as any opposition against the ruling elite pops up, and who can blame them? We almost handed over this argument and if democratic states can do it, why not a dictatorship?
The efforts to make our countries more secure by taking away our privacy rights will not protect us. What will terrorists do if every transaction with an electronic record is tracked? Do you think it will stop them? If we strip-search everyone passing the boarder, have thousands of supercomputers roaming every bit of information, impose restrictions regarding anything remotely dangerous and bomb everyone around us, will that stop terrorists?
One other “war” going on is the war on drugs. Despite dogs and boarder-guards, travel restrictions, constant surveillance, massive media campaigns, and harsh penalties drugs still flow across the boarders without any problem. And if the police happens to catch a couple of bad guys and throw them into jail with steel cages, surrounded by barbed wire, watched by armed guards, getting them drug-tested, strip-searched, X-rayed, and videotaped –they still manage to get in, sell and do drugs. So how can we possibly stop the flow of drugs to an entire nation? We can’t, it’s impossible, and so is stopping a well planed terrorist attack.
There is no problem getting old of a gun, and building a bomb - a kid can do that. Chemical and biological weapons are available for the highest bidder and it’s only a matter of time before the next attack. Terrorism isn’t something new, it’s been around for as long as there has been civilization, so there is nothing new about it either.
Governments everywhere are creating central databases with all of our information in it. And because of this they think they can catch more terrorists. They are wrong. They already had enough information to stop several of the 9/11 terrorists before they committed their terrible acts but they ignored it, or didn’t connect it with other important information. Now they will have hundreds (maybe thousands) of times as much information to sift through. Instead of looking for a needle in a haystack, they will be looking for the same needle in a thousand haystacks. It’s not going to work. The only thing they are doing is crushing what little liberty we have left.
I have always wondered why the American Administration doesn't just blow up the National Archives. None of them pay any attention to the Constitution any way. And we Europeans aren’t any better, and we are more used to being under control, we have it in our blood, and none of the European countries have anything like the US constitution to refer to, we just have laws decreed from above. All a European ruler needs to do is to fool enough people, with the help of the media and other elitists that a certain way of action is prudent, and we are in a dictatorship. This is the road we are on.
So, the terrorists are winning, what can we do about it? Basically nothing except for exchanging rulers, either by election or by revolt. But voting will only put another ruler of the same caliber in place and a rebellion will just make all coup-makers into “terrorists”.
Thankfully, our economies are deteriorating and we are living within the confines of a depression, even if our enemies do their very best to argue the opposite. In the end this may lead to something good, if people finally realize who to blame and what to do.
What we need is more freedom, not less. Smaller governments, not bigger. But what we really need is to fully understand the concept of violence. Most people are against wars wherein armed people face other armed people, but very few are against armed police and military striking down at unarmed citizens. Many people are against aggressive attacks on foreign land, but the very same people have no qualms about the government using the same violence or threat of violence against their own populace. As long as you do not look into the mirror and admit to yourself that you, in fact, are pro-violence and that you want the government to use force against its own people, including against yourself, we can never stop terrorism or wars coming to be. If you don’t see this, ask yourself the following questions. What happens if you stop paying taxes? If you refuse the draft? What will they do to you if you build a house in a certain style, with a certain color at a certain place without the government’s permission? The only way a government can act is through violence or threat of violence. Let me repeat that, you need to understand, the ONLY power a government has is the power of force. As long as you don’t recognize this fact, you are always going to be pro-violence, pro-war and, in affect; pro-terrorism. And this is why the terrorists are winning.
And I hope that more of you realize what they are doing to the free media. Even if you support the war on terror or most of the stuff the government does, don’t you wanna have access to instantaneous information from independent sources just in case? Don’t you want to feel you can read hundreds of papers online instead of being dependent of a few? Please people; don’t let them stop the signal.
Millions of people have died in the aftermath of 9/11, the terrorists resolve has undoubtedly been strengthen, and there is no shortage of new recruits to kill more innocent people. We have given up much of our democratic rights, and hardly any of our basic freedom remains. In effect, one can say, with absolute certainly, that the terrorists are winning.
There are a lot of people believing that 9/11 was a staged attack, possibly by the American government, some powerful banking people or the CIA. I don’t really believe that, the risk would be too great, too many people would know about it, and there is too much evidence showing this was not the case. However, George W Chimp had falling approval rating, and those in power got the perfect excuse to impose a fascist’s wet dream. So in either case, normal people and democracy, as a whole, ended up losing.
The terrorists are beating us. We are losing the war.
America has done what the terrorists wanted. It has become less free. Only the patriot act is a violation of unprecedented degree, and the US are becoming more and more like the police state that we are being told terrorists like. Similar draconian laws are being passed in Europe and it seems like anything can be excused as long as it is disguised as a “war on terror”. Already totalitarian states like China or Iran is claiming “terrorism” as soon as any opposition against the ruling elite pops up, and who can blame them? We almost handed over this argument and if democratic states can do it, why not a dictatorship?
The efforts to make our countries more secure by taking away our privacy rights will not protect us. What will terrorists do if every transaction with an electronic record is tracked? Do you think it will stop them? If we strip-search everyone passing the boarder, have thousands of supercomputers roaming every bit of information, impose restrictions regarding anything remotely dangerous and bomb everyone around us, will that stop terrorists?
One other “war” going on is the war on drugs. Despite dogs and boarder-guards, travel restrictions, constant surveillance, massive media campaigns, and harsh penalties drugs still flow across the boarders without any problem. And if the police happens to catch a couple of bad guys and throw them into jail with steel cages, surrounded by barbed wire, watched by armed guards, getting them drug-tested, strip-searched, X-rayed, and videotaped –they still manage to get in, sell and do drugs. So how can we possibly stop the flow of drugs to an entire nation? We can’t, it’s impossible, and so is stopping a well planed terrorist attack.
There is no problem getting old of a gun, and building a bomb - a kid can do that. Chemical and biological weapons are available for the highest bidder and it’s only a matter of time before the next attack. Terrorism isn’t something new, it’s been around for as long as there has been civilization, so there is nothing new about it either.
Governments everywhere are creating central databases with all of our information in it. And because of this they think they can catch more terrorists. They are wrong. They already had enough information to stop several of the 9/11 terrorists before they committed their terrible acts but they ignored it, or didn’t connect it with other important information. Now they will have hundreds (maybe thousands) of times as much information to sift through. Instead of looking for a needle in a haystack, they will be looking for the same needle in a thousand haystacks. It’s not going to work. The only thing they are doing is crushing what little liberty we have left.
I have always wondered why the American Administration doesn't just blow up the National Archives. None of them pay any attention to the Constitution any way. And we Europeans aren’t any better, and we are more used to being under control, we have it in our blood, and none of the European countries have anything like the US constitution to refer to, we just have laws decreed from above. All a European ruler needs to do is to fool enough people, with the help of the media and other elitists that a certain way of action is prudent, and we are in a dictatorship. This is the road we are on.
So, the terrorists are winning, what can we do about it? Basically nothing except for exchanging rulers, either by election or by revolt. But voting will only put another ruler of the same caliber in place and a rebellion will just make all coup-makers into “terrorists”.
Thankfully, our economies are deteriorating and we are living within the confines of a depression, even if our enemies do their very best to argue the opposite. In the end this may lead to something good, if people finally realize who to blame and what to do.
What we need is more freedom, not less. Smaller governments, not bigger. But what we really need is to fully understand the concept of violence. Most people are against wars wherein armed people face other armed people, but very few are against armed police and military striking down at unarmed citizens. Many people are against aggressive attacks on foreign land, but the very same people have no qualms about the government using the same violence or threat of violence against their own populace. As long as you do not look into the mirror and admit to yourself that you, in fact, are pro-violence and that you want the government to use force against its own people, including against yourself, we can never stop terrorism or wars coming to be. If you don’t see this, ask yourself the following questions. What happens if you stop paying taxes? If you refuse the draft? What will they do to you if you build a house in a certain style, with a certain color at a certain place without the government’s permission? The only way a government can act is through violence or threat of violence. Let me repeat that, you need to understand, the ONLY power a government has is the power of force. As long as you don’t recognize this fact, you are always going to be pro-violence, pro-war and, in affect; pro-terrorism. And this is why the terrorists are winning.
And I hope that more of you realize what they are doing to the free media. Even if you support the war on terror or most of the stuff the government does, don’t you wanna have access to instantaneous information from independent sources just in case? Don’t you want to feel you can read hundreds of papers online instead of being dependent of a few? Please people; don’t let them stop the signal.
European funnies
As most educated, intelligent and well informed people know, the madness and evildoing exists pretty much everywhere. Our entire species is just a bunch of sheople waiting for our masters to shave of our wool, feed us and in other ways take care of us. And as the saying goes, some at the farm are a bit more equal than others.
One of these a-bit-more-equal ones is the froggy leader, in this story called Sarky. Sarky have decided that families on his part of the farm will pay an extra tax for the trucks bringing food, seed and other useful products. This is because of Sarky’s unrelenting thirst for power and a desperate need for more money to his court. Since this authority figure and his jesters always seem to run out of founds, and since they cannot overtax sheople directly on the work they do on the farm, that would be to obvious, they have instead needed to invent a scheme to hide their greed. Thankfully, almost all other communities within the farm and the UA (United Animals) have tricked most flocks that the fumes from the truck are dangerous. During campaigns such as “let the horse pull the wagon again” and the wonderful “fertilizer can be used as fuel”, they have used professor CooCooshit and his employed staff of equally greedy students, to sell this notion. The tax – initially set at €17 per tonne of carbon dioxide emissions – will be levied on each animal and businesses for fossil fuel consumption within the farm. It’s all a scam, of course, but once implemented it will bring in mucho green to Sarky and all of those of stature to successfully pay for a manor or two and leave money over for more height increasing apparatuses. The latter to bring Sarky, and others of unfair lower heights, up to normal sized animals.
Bordering to Sarky’s kingdom, is the former arch enemy of the froggies, the wiener loving cows. Their supreme leader Mrs Merkuul and her marry band of bandits have decided to re-ratify The Farm’s Lisbonbon Treaty. This in a masterful move of deceit and power play in order to get those pesky leprecon’s a bit further away to finally cave in under pressure and approve this treaty on their 58th attempt to vote about it. All 58 times before those stupid leprecons have voted no, but that does not stop the European Farm Union’s elitists to push for another referendum, those island living leprecons are bound to make the correct decision sooner or later. Just give them enough chances.
A bit south on the Farm is the home of Mr. Berluscones . He’s the leader of the pasta and wine community consistent of goats. Mr. Berluscones have recently been revealed as a sex crazed old goat. As the owner of several farm-pamphlets he has tried to avoid the exposure, but when it was found out that he has lots of buttered up phallus-shaped loafs of very stale bread at his mansion, a mansion that often got visits from well-shaped professional hens, his secret came out. Most of the other elitists envy this old goat for getting erected at his age, but a total of 30 young hens were alleged to have attended 18 dinner parties at Mr. Berluscones lavish residence over a five month period, with five allegedly paid 1,000 Euros each to spend the night and offer the aged goat services like “tickle me with feathers” and “that’s not where the eggs comes out”. And such events cannot go by without being the talk of the farm.
And finally, all over the farm there has been a big crisis. Crops are withering, the farmhouse is falling apart, the barn is losing its paint and the water is drying up. Also the high payouts to animals doing nothing has grown so much that hardly anyone works anymore. But, most importantly, the sinister crows, that handles all the money, have swindled away most riches, lend out a lot that no one can pay back and also stolen what little glimmering metals there are.
Now, however, the elitists from all animals and kingdoms have got together and borrowed from other farms, and among themselves, to pay for cute little rip-offs.
They have used their printing machines to paper over all the holes in the farmhouse, and with red paper glued to the barn it looks brand new again. In the fields they have put out plastic crops to fill in the gaps of the ones failing, and the water has been rationed. All leftover riches, and most of the borrowed ones, have gone to the crows, they are sure to do a better job this time around – propping up stocks and creating fake values in the farm with all this borrowed and newly printed money.
Thanks to the elitists of the farm, the crows have also managed to trick several farm animals to borrow money for themselves again, buying new homes they actually don’t need and getting so in debt they hardly can feed their young.
And now when the farm is looking quite good again, the farm newsletter, own by the crows, is shrieking out that the crisis is over.
So now all is well, let’s just hope that tornado at the horizon doesn’t strike the farm. Also we can put trust in that that strange looking noisy mountain with that shiny stuff pouring out of it isn’t up to any mischief.
Yapp, all is well…
One of these a-bit-more-equal ones is the froggy leader, in this story called Sarky. Sarky have decided that families on his part of the farm will pay an extra tax for the trucks bringing food, seed and other useful products. This is because of Sarky’s unrelenting thirst for power and a desperate need for more money to his court. Since this authority figure and his jesters always seem to run out of founds, and since they cannot overtax sheople directly on the work they do on the farm, that would be to obvious, they have instead needed to invent a scheme to hide their greed. Thankfully, almost all other communities within the farm and the UA (United Animals) have tricked most flocks that the fumes from the truck are dangerous. During campaigns such as “let the horse pull the wagon again” and the wonderful “fertilizer can be used as fuel”, they have used professor CooCooshit and his employed staff of equally greedy students, to sell this notion. The tax – initially set at €17 per tonne of carbon dioxide emissions – will be levied on each animal and businesses for fossil fuel consumption within the farm. It’s all a scam, of course, but once implemented it will bring in mucho green to Sarky and all of those of stature to successfully pay for a manor or two and leave money over for more height increasing apparatuses. The latter to bring Sarky, and others of unfair lower heights, up to normal sized animals.
Bordering to Sarky’s kingdom, is the former arch enemy of the froggies, the wiener loving cows. Their supreme leader Mrs Merkuul and her marry band of bandits have decided to re-ratify The Farm’s Lisbonbon Treaty. This in a masterful move of deceit and power play in order to get those pesky leprecon’s a bit further away to finally cave in under pressure and approve this treaty on their 58th attempt to vote about it. All 58 times before those stupid leprecons have voted no, but that does not stop the European Farm Union’s elitists to push for another referendum, those island living leprecons are bound to make the correct decision sooner or later. Just give them enough chances.
A bit south on the Farm is the home of Mr. Berluscones . He’s the leader of the pasta and wine community consistent of goats. Mr. Berluscones have recently been revealed as a sex crazed old goat. As the owner of several farm-pamphlets he has tried to avoid the exposure, but when it was found out that he has lots of buttered up phallus-shaped loafs of very stale bread at his mansion, a mansion that often got visits from well-shaped professional hens, his secret came out. Most of the other elitists envy this old goat for getting erected at his age, but a total of 30 young hens were alleged to have attended 18 dinner parties at Mr. Berluscones lavish residence over a five month period, with five allegedly paid 1,000 Euros each to spend the night and offer the aged goat services like “tickle me with feathers” and “that’s not where the eggs comes out”. And such events cannot go by without being the talk of the farm.
And finally, all over the farm there has been a big crisis. Crops are withering, the farmhouse is falling apart, the barn is losing its paint and the water is drying up. Also the high payouts to animals doing nothing has grown so much that hardly anyone works anymore. But, most importantly, the sinister crows, that handles all the money, have swindled away most riches, lend out a lot that no one can pay back and also stolen what little glimmering metals there are.
Now, however, the elitists from all animals and kingdoms have got together and borrowed from other farms, and among themselves, to pay for cute little rip-offs.
They have used their printing machines to paper over all the holes in the farmhouse, and with red paper glued to the barn it looks brand new again. In the fields they have put out plastic crops to fill in the gaps of the ones failing, and the water has been rationed. All leftover riches, and most of the borrowed ones, have gone to the crows, they are sure to do a better job this time around – propping up stocks and creating fake values in the farm with all this borrowed and newly printed money.
Thanks to the elitists of the farm, the crows have also managed to trick several farm animals to borrow money for themselves again, buying new homes they actually don’t need and getting so in debt they hardly can feed their young.
And now when the farm is looking quite good again, the farm newsletter, own by the crows, is shrieking out that the crisis is over.
So now all is well, let’s just hope that tornado at the horizon doesn’t strike the farm. Also we can put trust in that that strange looking noisy mountain with that shiny stuff pouring out of it isn’t up to any mischief.
Yapp, all is well…
Ever seen a Girl Scout flying past during a hurrican?
WASHINGTON (AFP) – The United States wants to enlist its 3.4 million Girl Scouts in the effort to combat hurricanes, pandemics, terror attacks and other disasters.
How fun? Isn’t it?
With the promise of a new patch if they pitch in and undergo training, many young girls are likely to sign up. The patch will be available alongside existing Girls Are Great, Girl Scouts Against Smoking, Media Know-How and Read to Lead patches, and, of course, the Cookie Sale Activity Pin.
I’m still trying to rap my head around the “combat hurricane” –scenario. How exactly is this going to work? I do guess that the main idea is to have these pedocatchers helping out with debris, helping the sick, distribute food and such, but is a hurricane stricken area really the sort of place for young girls? Riots, lootings, injured and desperate people with lots of mayhem and destruction doesn’t really sound like selling cookies. And pandemics? Will they help out holding down babies so they don’t squiggle too much during vaccination? And terrorist attacks? There is probably no real catching-the-bad-guy training involved, but what then? Picking up body-parts? Searching our computers? Reassuring adults that everything is going to be okay?
During World War II, Girl Scouts operated bicycle courier services, invested more than 48,000 hours in Farm Aid projects, collected fat and scrap metal. As the end of the second millennium neared and computers around the world were expected to be stricken with a debilitating bug, Girl Scouts were enlisted in some parts of the country to hand out advice about the threat poised by Y2K. After the September 11, 2001 attacks scouts hosted remembrance ceremonies and wrote thank-you letters to rescuer workers.
Aha, okay, that answers some questions, they are going to act as an extra free working unite spreading “information”, writing letters and otherwise being helpful. However, some of my questions above still remains, and doesn’t this sound more like forming more government stooges? And sure enough…:
The unveiling of the patch marks a partnership between the scouts and Citizen Corps, a community-based initiative under the DHS's Federal Emergency Management Agency.
This kind of works well together with a decision from 18 of March 2009 made by the House in the US, when they voted yes to the Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education (GIVE) Act. This made it possible to dramatically increase funding for AmeriCorps, with a goal of expanding from 75,000 volunteers to 250,000 (nowadays apparently there are even more of them). Obama has also called on all citizens to “serve America” requiring somewhere in-between 50-150 hours of community service. Under this plan, all Americans between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five will be asked to serve their country by going through three months of basic training, civil defense preparation and community service.” These people also get fun things like uniforms, staying at campuses for their training and get paid for this voluntary service.
Ever considered bringing home those millions of soldiers deployed all over the world? But nah, that might lower GDP, and we cannot have that.
Yeah, this will turn out very well…
Probably not really applicable, I just like the picture…
How fun? Isn’t it?
With the promise of a new patch if they pitch in and undergo training, many young girls are likely to sign up. The patch will be available alongside existing Girls Are Great, Girl Scouts Against Smoking, Media Know-How and Read to Lead patches, and, of course, the Cookie Sale Activity Pin.
I’m still trying to rap my head around the “combat hurricane” –scenario. How exactly is this going to work? I do guess that the main idea is to have these pedocatchers helping out with debris, helping the sick, distribute food and such, but is a hurricane stricken area really the sort of place for young girls? Riots, lootings, injured and desperate people with lots of mayhem and destruction doesn’t really sound like selling cookies. And pandemics? Will they help out holding down babies so they don’t squiggle too much during vaccination? And terrorist attacks? There is probably no real catching-the-bad-guy training involved, but what then? Picking up body-parts? Searching our computers? Reassuring adults that everything is going to be okay?
During World War II, Girl Scouts operated bicycle courier services, invested more than 48,000 hours in Farm Aid projects, collected fat and scrap metal. As the end of the second millennium neared and computers around the world were expected to be stricken with a debilitating bug, Girl Scouts were enlisted in some parts of the country to hand out advice about the threat poised by Y2K. After the September 11, 2001 attacks scouts hosted remembrance ceremonies and wrote thank-you letters to rescuer workers.
Aha, okay, that answers some questions, they are going to act as an extra free working unite spreading “information”, writing letters and otherwise being helpful. However, some of my questions above still remains, and doesn’t this sound more like forming more government stooges? And sure enough…:
The unveiling of the patch marks a partnership between the scouts and Citizen Corps, a community-based initiative under the DHS's Federal Emergency Management Agency.
This kind of works well together with a decision from 18 of March 2009 made by the House in the US, when they voted yes to the Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education (GIVE) Act. This made it possible to dramatically increase funding for AmeriCorps, with a goal of expanding from 75,000 volunteers to 250,000 (nowadays apparently there are even more of them). Obama has also called on all citizens to “serve America” requiring somewhere in-between 50-150 hours of community service. Under this plan, all Americans between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five will be asked to serve their country by going through three months of basic training, civil defense preparation and community service.” These people also get fun things like uniforms, staying at campuses for their training and get paid for this voluntary service.
Ever considered bringing home those millions of soldiers deployed all over the world? But nah, that might lower GDP, and we cannot have that.
Yeah, this will turn out very well…
Probably not really applicable, I just like the picture…
The madness continues II – the UK example
It is also reported that House Prices in the UK rose for the second successive month in August. House prices rose 0.8 per cent in August, on top of a 1.2 per cent rise in July.
From FT: Martin Ellis, economist at Halifax, said: “Demand for housing has increased since the start of the year due to better affordability and low interest rates. This, together with low levels of property available for sale, has boosted house prices over the last few months.”
This evildoer is partly right, low interest rates and low levels of property for sale has boosted sales somewhat. But do you know what? Britain’s taxpayer-owned banks are actually also selling repossessed property assets to their own subsidiaries to avoid billions of pounds of losses that would be incurred by selling them in the open market. Not sure what this means? Let me explain.
A bank gets themselves another bank, a lending institute, or just starts one. Then they make this institution buy homes from the bigger and more sinister counterpart at “market value” which makes the books look nicer. So why don’t put it out on the open market? To keep the price up because the market is not willing to buy at that price, and higher prices and more incoming revenue make the master-bank look solvent. All in all, making prices go up. Isn’t this a nice little move?
The same thing is going on in the US, which is the main reason why any closed bank gone bankrupt is written down 20-30-40% and sometimes over 50% in value. These giant losses being raked up can ONLY be dealt with if prices continue up in addition to people getting back to work and wealth accumulation takes off again. If this doesn’t happen… well… let’s just say bon voyage…
Read more in this times article
From FT: Martin Ellis, economist at Halifax, said: “Demand for housing has increased since the start of the year due to better affordability and low interest rates. This, together with low levels of property available for sale, has boosted house prices over the last few months.”
This evildoer is partly right, low interest rates and low levels of property for sale has boosted sales somewhat. But do you know what? Britain’s taxpayer-owned banks are actually also selling repossessed property assets to their own subsidiaries to avoid billions of pounds of losses that would be incurred by selling them in the open market. Not sure what this means? Let me explain.
A bank gets themselves another bank, a lending institute, or just starts one. Then they make this institution buy homes from the bigger and more sinister counterpart at “market value” which makes the books look nicer. So why don’t put it out on the open market? To keep the price up because the market is not willing to buy at that price, and higher prices and more incoming revenue make the master-bank look solvent. All in all, making prices go up. Isn’t this a nice little move?
The same thing is going on in the US, which is the main reason why any closed bank gone bankrupt is written down 20-30-40% and sometimes over 50% in value. These giant losses being raked up can ONLY be dealt with if prices continue up in addition to people getting back to work and wealth accumulation takes off again. If this doesn’t happen… well… let’s just say bon voyage…
Read more in this times article
The madness continues
The cost of purchasing an apartment continues upwards in Sweden. Unemployment is still going up; the government is running a SEK 200 billion deficits, several banks still have huge loses to cope with, trade is way down and the fundamentals in the economy is shaky at best, but people are still buying homes. The total accumulated Swedish debt is now 150% of GDP and rising, but people are still borrowing and buying apartments. Now, what’s the very definition of a bubble again?
There are two reasons for prices going up. Firstly, with a lesser impact, are the low level of construction and a scarcity of homes in general. If there isn’t enough on the markets, prices will go up. The government has seen to this through massive regulations, sky-high taxes and few competitors. Secondly, and most important, interest rates from the central bank (Riksbanken) is actually on minus, in affect paying lending institutes to take hundreds of billions. With this free money and very low interest rates, people feel the urge to out borrowing and spend, further raking up a debt. This is, of course, pure madness.
We are repeating the mistakes made in the 80’s when the real-estate and housing markets in Sweden crashed, making several banks going bankrupt. But this time around it’s even worse. Worse because of how the world markets and several fundaments in several important economies look. The Chinese government is urging its citizens to buy Gold and Silver, ever wondered why that is?
People should not be buying anything right now, and least of all, housing. Such a big investments means that lots of money get tied up in a fixed way, and if there is a mortgage attached to it, those idiots are trapped when the real mayhem starts. So lots of capital is getting ensnared within homes, capital that is much needed elsewhere, and will be even more wanted in the future. We stake up more debt and will build a huge bubble. Together with all the rest of the economy this spells complete disaster.
The central bank people and the Swedish government should all be stringed up. But you, the idiots, you are also to blame. If you listen to cornflake economists, deceitful elected frauds and pundits that never got a single thing right, then you deserve whatever you get
There are two reasons for prices going up. Firstly, with a lesser impact, are the low level of construction and a scarcity of homes in general. If there isn’t enough on the markets, prices will go up. The government has seen to this through massive regulations, sky-high taxes and few competitors. Secondly, and most important, interest rates from the central bank (Riksbanken) is actually on minus, in affect paying lending institutes to take hundreds of billions. With this free money and very low interest rates, people feel the urge to out borrowing and spend, further raking up a debt. This is, of course, pure madness.
We are repeating the mistakes made in the 80’s when the real-estate and housing markets in Sweden crashed, making several banks going bankrupt. But this time around it’s even worse. Worse because of how the world markets and several fundaments in several important economies look. The Chinese government is urging its citizens to buy Gold and Silver, ever wondered why that is?
People should not be buying anything right now, and least of all, housing. Such a big investments means that lots of money get tied up in a fixed way, and if there is a mortgage attached to it, those idiots are trapped when the real mayhem starts. So lots of capital is getting ensnared within homes, capital that is much needed elsewhere, and will be even more wanted in the future. We stake up more debt and will build a huge bubble. Together with all the rest of the economy this spells complete disaster.
The central bank people and the Swedish government should all be stringed up. But you, the idiots, you are also to blame. If you listen to cornflake economists, deceitful elected frauds and pundits that never got a single thing right, then you deserve whatever you get
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
The mildest flu-year in decades?
Our loveable and sooo well educated journalists that only want what’s best for all of us keep spreading lies about the Swine Flu. There are so many facts out there that tells us that this flu is pretty much harmless, and unless a mutation happens soon we can already now, today, discard this “pandemic” and this year as one of the lest deadly flu-years ever recorded.
Again I need you all to visit Junkfood Science – a place of facts, not scaremongering.
“In reality, the pandemic H1N1 variant has proven to remain far less virulent (milder) than the seasonal flu, as evidenced in Australia and the United States. As of last week, the total number of influenza-related deaths in the United States — including from the H1N1 pandemic — have remained below epidemic levels and resulted in 2009 being the mildest flu year in more than a decade.”
Junkfood Science
Again I need you all to visit Junkfood Science – a place of facts, not scaremongering.
“In reality, the pandemic H1N1 variant has proven to remain far less virulent (milder) than the seasonal flu, as evidenced in Australia and the United States. As of last week, the total number of influenza-related deaths in the United States — including from the H1N1 pandemic — have remained below epidemic levels and resulted in 2009 being the mildest flu year in more than a decade.”
Junkfood Science
The Great Leader’s mumbo jumbo
Yesterday the American president stood before congress and held a speech that was among his worst ever. Reading and watching European media one immediately realized that hardly anyone actually watched it. The whole smoke- and mirror speech can be found on YouTube, maybe our journalists should go watch it before they report? (New York Times transcript of the speech)
The president avoided making concrete commitments on some of the most contentious issues, reflecting a guiding principle of his legislative strategy: to put off the most controversial decisions until the very last moment. This is something that has been one of Obama’s betrayals of his voters since he promised that not only would every bill be fully visible on the net long before any votes been casted, everyone were to get lots of time to debate and read through every legislation. Instead the complete opposite has happen. A couple of the most controversial and important bills ever past in the US congress have not been available until the very last second, apparently the president will do the same with his health-care reform. I wonder how many parliaments and governing bodies around the world that would accept that?
One congressman, Joe Wilson from South Carolina, shouted “you lie” during Obama’s speech, which I find very mellow and kind of him. Not only is the president lying over and over again, he is willfully destroying the economy, wasting tax money by the trillions and have already indebted every child and grandchild in America for the rest of their lives. Without a doubt this Obamination is the worst president in American history, and that one can say today not even a year into his presidency.
Before the speech, a poll conducted by Associated Press and GfK Roper Public Affairs & Media found that just 42% of Americans approve of the way Obama is handling healthcare, while 52% disapprove. His approval rating is going to continue downwards since he is lying, not taking a clear stand and continues to refuse to outline the details.
The chamber, which initially backed efforts to reshape the nation's healthcare system, has become a leading critic of bills being advanced by congressional Democrats, running ads in 21 states opposing the plans.
In Europe, where all countries have some sort of universal coverage in regards to healthcare, the discussion becomes a bit strange. Firstly the media and lefties want us to believe that those 45 million or so uninsured US citizens are dying on the streets, which is just ridiculous. Out of those uninsured many don’t want it, they can pay, but don’t want to or need to. And it’s not that they don’t get public founded help when really needed, they do. So any scary exceptions and those few people that have fallen between the cracks are hardly a reason to change things for those 300 million people that is very happy with their healthcare.
Looking at Europe we have waiting lines, some countries cannot, or will not, perform certain operations, and the same scary examples can be found over here with grandmas dying waiting for the doctor or people not getting the right diagnose. I have myself several examples how horribly the Swedish and UK system works. No system is perfect in this regard, but if I haft to choose between being sick and injured in Sweden/UK or in the US, I would chose US 10 times out of 10.
We have been fed lies in Europe and the horrid president is trying to sell the same lies to the American people. The tax- and healthcare revolt will continue and hopefully people will take to arms before it’s too late.
The president avoided making concrete commitments on some of the most contentious issues, reflecting a guiding principle of his legislative strategy: to put off the most controversial decisions until the very last moment. This is something that has been one of Obama’s betrayals of his voters since he promised that not only would every bill be fully visible on the net long before any votes been casted, everyone were to get lots of time to debate and read through every legislation. Instead the complete opposite has happen. A couple of the most controversial and important bills ever past in the US congress have not been available until the very last second, apparently the president will do the same with his health-care reform. I wonder how many parliaments and governing bodies around the world that would accept that?
One congressman, Joe Wilson from South Carolina, shouted “you lie” during Obama’s speech, which I find very mellow and kind of him. Not only is the president lying over and over again, he is willfully destroying the economy, wasting tax money by the trillions and have already indebted every child and grandchild in America for the rest of their lives. Without a doubt this Obamination is the worst president in American history, and that one can say today not even a year into his presidency.
Before the speech, a poll conducted by Associated Press and GfK Roper Public Affairs & Media found that just 42% of Americans approve of the way Obama is handling healthcare, while 52% disapprove. His approval rating is going to continue downwards since he is lying, not taking a clear stand and continues to refuse to outline the details.
The chamber, which initially backed efforts to reshape the nation's healthcare system, has become a leading critic of bills being advanced by congressional Democrats, running ads in 21 states opposing the plans.
In Europe, where all countries have some sort of universal coverage in regards to healthcare, the discussion becomes a bit strange. Firstly the media and lefties want us to believe that those 45 million or so uninsured US citizens are dying on the streets, which is just ridiculous. Out of those uninsured many don’t want it, they can pay, but don’t want to or need to. And it’s not that they don’t get public founded help when really needed, they do. So any scary exceptions and those few people that have fallen between the cracks are hardly a reason to change things for those 300 million people that is very happy with their healthcare.
Looking at Europe we have waiting lines, some countries cannot, or will not, perform certain operations, and the same scary examples can be found over here with grandmas dying waiting for the doctor or people not getting the right diagnose. I have myself several examples how horribly the Swedish and UK system works. No system is perfect in this regard, but if I haft to choose between being sick and injured in Sweden/UK or in the US, I would chose US 10 times out of 10.
We have been fed lies in Europe and the horrid president is trying to sell the same lies to the American people. The tax- and healthcare revolt will continue and hopefully people will take to arms before it’s too late.
Getting censured
Anyone else noticed that critical voices very often get censured on the most common media-sites? This goes in general, not for one country or one paper.
Just laughable.
No wonder they want to restrict and control blogs and such...
Just laughable.
No wonder they want to restrict and control blogs and such...
Idiots
On this afternoon some reporters are writing that the Swedish currency, Kronan (SEK) has reached a new high for the year against the USD. The Swedish currency dropped against the Euro, for example, but that is largely ignored. Also, today, the dollar dropped to the weakest level in almost a year against the currencies of the six major US trading partners.
Here is a newsflash for you idiots at the media; it was the dollar that weakened! Not the SEK that got stronger. And that is what you should write. In fact, with this in mind, the Krona actually got weaker! Not stronger. Morons.
I am not the only one that has been predicting the shortcomings of the USD and how it will continue to lose value the more time that passes. And people have been saying that for years, so this is not news, it’s just another reference point. As long as the Chinese, Japanese and some others still need the USD, it will keep a decent level. But as soon as other currencies or other things with value have been purchased to replace the dollar, the real fall will happen. And we are not taking about 20%-30% lower levels against today, we are taking total annihilation. In two years from now the USD will exist no longer. What this does to equities, commodities and other things that have a strong relationship with the dollar, a child can figure that out. Say bye bye to cheap oil, these low levels of Gold and Silver values, and hello to another world.
I wonder when any of those spin-doctors at the media are going to work for a living? There are plenty of stories to “break” for the one who does…
Here is a newsflash for you idiots at the media; it was the dollar that weakened! Not the SEK that got stronger. And that is what you should write. In fact, with this in mind, the Krona actually got weaker! Not stronger. Morons.
I am not the only one that has been predicting the shortcomings of the USD and how it will continue to lose value the more time that passes. And people have been saying that for years, so this is not news, it’s just another reference point. As long as the Chinese, Japanese and some others still need the USD, it will keep a decent level. But as soon as other currencies or other things with value have been purchased to replace the dollar, the real fall will happen. And we are not taking about 20%-30% lower levels against today, we are taking total annihilation. In two years from now the USD will exist no longer. What this does to equities, commodities and other things that have a strong relationship with the dollar, a child can figure that out. Say bye bye to cheap oil, these low levels of Gold and Silver values, and hello to another world.
I wonder when any of those spin-doctors at the media are going to work for a living? There are plenty of stories to “break” for the one who does…
Our enemies put on a showcase
Apparently the power elitists are trying to sell us a notion of their differences before next year’s election in Sweden. And out comes all the troops supporting one side or the other, and journalist jump on the bandwagon helping out spreading the lies.
It appears that the opposition wants to increase taxes, no surprise there, lefties usual answer to all problems. The current mish mash of parties ruling Sweden, having lowered taxes with a couple of percent, is out meeting this “revelation” with their propaganda machine. All in all it seems like there is a difference here and this supposed dissimilarity between our “choices” is being drummed out constantly from all directions.
What is really the difference between the two sides?
They all want you to vote, they all want you to pay your taxes, they all want you to obey the law and, from above tickling down, decrees. They all want surveillance and control of citizens, albeit in different degrees. They all argue for how they are going to use the almighty power of the state to fix all problems. And none of them can do anything without your money. It’s your money that pays for their lavish lifestyle, the airplanes, and the taxi-recites. You are the one paying for every meeting, every living expense, and every campaign they have to get your vote is also on your bill. So what’s the difference again?
In addition, every things that is being done for the people, is paid by the people. Every welfare program, every subsidized company, every bail-out, all the schools, hospitals and so forth that they “give to you” you have paid for. In every election in any country at any time throughout history, the politician wanting to be elected has promised things he firstly need to steal from the people in order to give some of it back to the same people. There is no Santa or money-tree our elected frauds get gifts from, it’s you they take it from and it is to you they give some of it back. From the very second you realize this and what it truly means you will stop listening to the lies and deceit. Sadly a very few number of people understand this basic concept.
They try to persuade us that there is a difference in a couple of percentage in taxes, or that there is a huge distinction from throwing money on that project instead of the other one. Really? Is it? And even if there is a slim variation that may make you give away that vote, how about the whole power structure? Does that change? Journalists cannot be elected, company owners can’t, and the banking elite that keep stealing the little money we have left after politicians have been robbing us, remains in power even when their banks have gone “bankrupt” several times over. Economists working for the überlords say the same thing no matter who get elected. Thousands of interest-groups will continue their campaigning no matter what, and thousands of lobbyists will continue to have more power than any of us voters.
But even if you get past all mentioned above with some degree of voting-feeling, how about the fact that the European Union dictates most of what goes on today? Or how about the fact that most propositions, laws and investigations is not done by those we elect but instead is carried out by hired administrators and bureaucrats? How about the fact that the political parties are the ones choosing who will be on the ballot? And to end up on that ballot you need to cheat, steal, sleep, defraud, lie, and kiss so many asses your lips will turn blue. Or what about the fact that not a single government in Swedish history (maybe with the exception during WW II) have had a majority of the people behind them? They don’t tell you that in school, but it’s true, check the numbers for yourself.
And if we look at the current administration they have a SEK 200 billion deficit, slightly lower taxes then before and have imposed the worst fascist laws ever seen in Swedish history. And the “alternative” wants to increase taxes slightly, run a similar deficit and continue (some minor changes) with the fascist laws. So what’s the difference again? Some slightly higher social welfare check versus a slightly lower tax? Please.
It’s all a scam, it’s a theatre and no matter who ends up as “winners” you, the ordinary man, is the loser. It’s like going around chairs and when that music stops the power elite finds plenty of seats while you are tied down in the corner not being allowed to play.
It’s a showcase that will gain momentum the closer to election we get. And by then we will hear that utter stupidity of “he, who does not vote, should not complain”. Trying to make you feel quilt because some fuzzy wuzzies in other countries have even worse rulers and cannot elect other rulers. There are different degrees of hell, that much is true, but if you get tortured with electric appliances or by someone pouring water over your face isn’t really a choice.
So I urge you all to not vote, and if you absolutely need to, pick some outsider that at least, temporarily, can shake things up a bit. Those pirates are kind of fun for instance and at least the pirates oppose the pure fascism the current government loves so much.
It appears that the opposition wants to increase taxes, no surprise there, lefties usual answer to all problems. The current mish mash of parties ruling Sweden, having lowered taxes with a couple of percent, is out meeting this “revelation” with their propaganda machine. All in all it seems like there is a difference here and this supposed dissimilarity between our “choices” is being drummed out constantly from all directions.
What is really the difference between the two sides?
They all want you to vote, they all want you to pay your taxes, they all want you to obey the law and, from above tickling down, decrees. They all want surveillance and control of citizens, albeit in different degrees. They all argue for how they are going to use the almighty power of the state to fix all problems. And none of them can do anything without your money. It’s your money that pays for their lavish lifestyle, the airplanes, and the taxi-recites. You are the one paying for every meeting, every living expense, and every campaign they have to get your vote is also on your bill. So what’s the difference again?
In addition, every things that is being done for the people, is paid by the people. Every welfare program, every subsidized company, every bail-out, all the schools, hospitals and so forth that they “give to you” you have paid for. In every election in any country at any time throughout history, the politician wanting to be elected has promised things he firstly need to steal from the people in order to give some of it back to the same people. There is no Santa or money-tree our elected frauds get gifts from, it’s you they take it from and it is to you they give some of it back. From the very second you realize this and what it truly means you will stop listening to the lies and deceit. Sadly a very few number of people understand this basic concept.
They try to persuade us that there is a difference in a couple of percentage in taxes, or that there is a huge distinction from throwing money on that project instead of the other one. Really? Is it? And even if there is a slim variation that may make you give away that vote, how about the whole power structure? Does that change? Journalists cannot be elected, company owners can’t, and the banking elite that keep stealing the little money we have left after politicians have been robbing us, remains in power even when their banks have gone “bankrupt” several times over. Economists working for the überlords say the same thing no matter who get elected. Thousands of interest-groups will continue their campaigning no matter what, and thousands of lobbyists will continue to have more power than any of us voters.
But even if you get past all mentioned above with some degree of voting-feeling, how about the fact that the European Union dictates most of what goes on today? Or how about the fact that most propositions, laws and investigations is not done by those we elect but instead is carried out by hired administrators and bureaucrats? How about the fact that the political parties are the ones choosing who will be on the ballot? And to end up on that ballot you need to cheat, steal, sleep, defraud, lie, and kiss so many asses your lips will turn blue. Or what about the fact that not a single government in Swedish history (maybe with the exception during WW II) have had a majority of the people behind them? They don’t tell you that in school, but it’s true, check the numbers for yourself.
And if we look at the current administration they have a SEK 200 billion deficit, slightly lower taxes then before and have imposed the worst fascist laws ever seen in Swedish history. And the “alternative” wants to increase taxes slightly, run a similar deficit and continue (some minor changes) with the fascist laws. So what’s the difference again? Some slightly higher social welfare check versus a slightly lower tax? Please.
It’s all a scam, it’s a theatre and no matter who ends up as “winners” you, the ordinary man, is the loser. It’s like going around chairs and when that music stops the power elite finds plenty of seats while you are tied down in the corner not being allowed to play.
It’s a showcase that will gain momentum the closer to election we get. And by then we will hear that utter stupidity of “he, who does not vote, should not complain”. Trying to make you feel quilt because some fuzzy wuzzies in other countries have even worse rulers and cannot elect other rulers. There are different degrees of hell, that much is true, but if you get tortured with electric appliances or by someone pouring water over your face isn’t really a choice.
So I urge you all to not vote, and if you absolutely need to, pick some outsider that at least, temporarily, can shake things up a bit. Those pirates are kind of fun for instance and at least the pirates oppose the pure fascism the current government loves so much.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)