The former President of US of A has been rushed to hospital. No reports of any lifeless corps yet, so we cannot get our hopes up.
Anyway Bill Cunt’on, 63 and still eating Big Mac’s, was hospitalized in New York City for chest pains. Apparently rushed to Columbia Presbyterian Hospital in Manhattan - most likely for a stent procedure.
According to a statement released by Douglas Band, a counselor to the ex-president, Clinton had two stents implanted:
'Today President Bill Clinton was admitted to the Columbia Campus of New York Presbyterian Hospital after feeling discomfort in his chest.
Following a visit to his cardiologist, he underwent a procedure to place two stents in one of his coronary arteries. President Clinton is in good spirits, and will continue to focus on the work of his Foundation and Haiti's relief and long-term recovery efforts.
In 2004, President Clinton underwent a successful quadruple bypass operation to free four blocked arteries.'
The stent, basically a wire mesh tube-shape, is inserted in the groin (ouch!) and moved up the artery to the blockage, then expanded to open blood flow through the accumulated plaque. So sadly the thieving adulterer, who’s supposed to be helping Haitians get food, will live to see another day.
"It depends on what the meaning of the words 'is' is." –Bill Clinton, during his 1998 grand jury testimony on the Monica Lewinsky affair
"It depends on how you define alone…" –Bill Clinton, in his grand jury testimony
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Corrupt dishonorable bastards
As expected the Swedish opposition has decided to follow the elitist agenda and implement all the fascist crap comes to internet and surveillance they can get their hands on. On point after point they get into line. And let’s not forget, most of this started during Social democrat rule.
To anyone knowing what’s really going on in the world, this isn’t a surprise. The established will protect their own, no matter what color, flag or ideology they claim to belong to.
To anyone knowing what’s really going on in the world, this isn’t a surprise. The established will protect their own, no matter what color, flag or ideology they claim to belong to.
Sweden - prior to, throughout and after the looming depression
This is mainly an outline of what’s to come and is constructed after the certainty of the future financial meltdown of this planets economic system. This is predictions based on the most benign interpretation of how things look right now.
Things will crash, there’s no question about that anymore. What we need to ask ourselves is “when?” and the follow-up; “How bad will it be?”.
We can, from Sweden’s deep dependent on foreign trade, conclude that when the shit hits the fan, passes through it and get splattered all over - it will make my birth-nation suffer severely. To make things worse almost all of the real wealth-creation within Sweden’s borders is reliant on having selling markets. In other words a worldwide depression will hit very hard both in short and long term.
There are other worrisome structural faults that will further enhance such a crisis. As example Sweden’s labor market is very rigid and few are those willing to move many miles to get a job. The taxes are still extremely high and government interventions are pretty much total from the cradle to the grave. The government is already today pressing the limits of public expenditure with too much borrowing and deficits. In addition the central bank, just as all of their counterparts, is doing pretty much everything wrong fueling the bubbles and increasing inflation.
To make matters even worse many of the big banks are already kneeing down under the pressure of massive losses in the Baltic States. Despite both getting bailed-out and handed a couple of hundreds of billions for free, the banks are still not cooping.
The mortgage bubble and the coming interest rate hikes will increase defaulting levels hence put further weight on the banks. So there’s no question that many of them will not survive the coming depression. Also, nothing has really been done to revolutionize any of the fundamentals in desperate need of change.
So when America, Portugal, Spain, UK, Japan and many others crashes and burns, this will mean serious trouble for Sweden.
On the plus side the Swedish government haven’t gone totally crazy with the borrowing, printing and manic spending as many other governments has. Sweden also have a decent savings rate, still bad but not as horrible as the US for example. The current administration also managed to sell off some publically owned companies which lowered the public debt and made a small contribution to a better future. The populace is pretty well educated, company taxes are in comparison low and there’s a history of manufacturing and production that will come in handy.
And maybe most important; Sweden isn’t part of the Euro-zone and has at least some coverage for future pensions, something many continent countries does not.
Presumably our enemies can keep the charade going for an additional year, so let’s assume that the real crash and burn happens during the summer of 2011. If so, Sweden will by then have another government of the more socialist variety which, of course, will make things even worse.
The problem with any government facing such a dire situation is that no matter what they do they are doomed. If they do the wrong thing they will prolong and enhance the crisis, if they do the right thing the crisis may be shortened but their very lives might be in danger.
And so I believe we will get a bi-partisan government just like during World War II. They will announce this as a way of “standing up for Sweden”, “Working for the common good” and with similar baloney. Journalists will celebrate such news and pundits will applaud saying it is necessary to see so called conservatives rule together with so called socialists. All of it will be lies, of course, but they need to show a good face to the public so they avoid the worst riots.
As the crisis rages on and people get more and more frustrated it will lead to more sympathies towards radical –isms’ which will lead to a great upswing in political violence and so the jackhammer from the government will come down harder and harder. The little freedoms we have left will go out the window. You think they are fascists comes to internet today? You think that a couple of cameras are bad? Pfffff… you’ve not seen anything yet.
How it will end? It’s hard to say today, they will never do the right thing, at least not fully, that’s for sure. And people are too stupid to elect any real alternative. But let’s be positive about it and say they partly do the right thing and from the ashes of our industries new companies are created. If that happens and the world hasn’t plummet down into WW III, maybe Sweden will be bouncing upwards again 10-15 years from now. And if so, better equipped and with better fundamentals then most other countries. So it’s not all bad, and maybe, just maybe this suffering generation and the coming generation will have learn that statism, socialism and state planning of the economy doesn’t work.
So, what is the real problem and how can we fix it?
Basically it can be stated that everything our elected frauds have been doing is wrong and mostly the complete opposite of what needs to be done.
When they borrowed shitloads of money - we should instead have cut expenditures. When they cut interest rates down to zero - we should instead have increased it with a couple of percentage. When they printed billions of new bills - we should instead have tightened an already very loose money-policy. When they accumulate debts to scary heights – we should instead have been saving money and/or cutting taxes. And NOT A SINGLE bailout should have been paid out.
Any mainstream economists reading this will start scratching his head and, from his point of view, come to the conclusion I’m either a madman or know nothing of economy, this because in his eyes this would have crashed our economy and started a massive ‘credit-crunch’.
To a degree he would be right. If we would have done what I believe is the right course of action it would have lead to an even worse situation than we had and still find ourselves in. We would also see a massive drop in borrowing, hardly anyone would be buying real-estate and many banks and bad companies would have went out of business. GDP would have dropped with 15-20 percent.
What cornflake economists, Keynesians and mainstream pundits don’t realize is that this is the point!
We need this to purge the system from toxic assets, drive out badly kept companies and ruin horrific fraudulent banks.
And you out there need to realize that the only thing keeping us afloat at the moment is fictitious markets, grossly overvalued alongside ridiculous government policies. When this stuff is withdrawn, which it hast to be, then comes the next bang. Because the problems are still there! They haven’t fixed anything, only swept it under the rug and while doing so worsening the problems.
However, my suggestion wouldn’t all be bad, on the contrary, because if this was implemented savings would go way up which in turn makes money available to investments and real wealth-creation. It would stop all the looting being done from financial institutes and banks. It would create a real market with no bubbles and people would quickly learn to adopt themselves to a non-fictitious way of life.
But the real benefit of this would be that within a year, a year and a half, it would be over. GDP would start going up again, jobs coming back, and new better run banks would take the old ones place and we would close to have eliminate inflation. Within three years Sweden would have been the leading economy adjustable after size and growth.
Sometimes you need to swallow that pill to get better. Sometimes you need to sleep, take a step back or reevaluate a way of life. The medicine might taste bad, but to get back to 100% health that temporarily bitter taste is a necessary evil.
If we after (and during) this crisis sold out all public owned companies, eliminated 97% of all laws and cut taxation in half (or preferably more) we would soon, very soon, be the richest country on the planet. Hopefully we can then take the next step and thrash the central bank as well as the phony fiat money and yet again resort to real money. And then we could write a constitution more direct and much more absolute than the American one, but with the same basic intent. In doing so eliminate the enemy class completely and finally Swedes would be free, happy and much richer than anyone else.
This is all a pipe-dream of course, in reality nothing of this will come to be. But this is the alternative as I see it.
Instead we will live with the boom-and-bust cycles that come with statism. Even IF their scheme were to succeed again i.e. things gets back to ‘normal’, it would only take another couple of years and we would crash again and so on in a never ending circle. We will also have to adjust to fascist internet regulations. We will need to accept that our income continues downward and that the elitists continue to fuck our arses with rusty appliances.
We need a revolution and a complete remodeling of our economy.
To make things clear to you all; our current situation has very little to do with capitalism, but it also has very little to do with the ideology of socialism.
We live in a mixed economy wherein big business, politicians, journalists and banks together rule all. This enemy class with their GramscoFabiaNazi ideology have created or are about to create fascist societies and the only ones that matter are the big, the rich, the powerful and, of course, the government. Statism would probably be the most correct term to use.
There are many socialist solutions being proposed and implemented, but that’s mainly to shut up the far lefties whom, idiots as they are, think they are getting more of their shiny happy fluffy heaven. At the same time the elitists keep some capitalism around, just to have something to loot.
The problem, however, is that sooner or later there’s nothing left to loot and with no one happy and with a totalitarian base the elitists only way out is to resort to violence. And this is the scary and very probable future we’re facing.
Things will crash, there’s no question about that anymore. What we need to ask ourselves is “when?” and the follow-up; “How bad will it be?”.
We can, from Sweden’s deep dependent on foreign trade, conclude that when the shit hits the fan, passes through it and get splattered all over - it will make my birth-nation suffer severely. To make things worse almost all of the real wealth-creation within Sweden’s borders is reliant on having selling markets. In other words a worldwide depression will hit very hard both in short and long term.
There are other worrisome structural faults that will further enhance such a crisis. As example Sweden’s labor market is very rigid and few are those willing to move many miles to get a job. The taxes are still extremely high and government interventions are pretty much total from the cradle to the grave. The government is already today pressing the limits of public expenditure with too much borrowing and deficits. In addition the central bank, just as all of their counterparts, is doing pretty much everything wrong fueling the bubbles and increasing inflation.
To make matters even worse many of the big banks are already kneeing down under the pressure of massive losses in the Baltic States. Despite both getting bailed-out and handed a couple of hundreds of billions for free, the banks are still not cooping.
The mortgage bubble and the coming interest rate hikes will increase defaulting levels hence put further weight on the banks. So there’s no question that many of them will not survive the coming depression. Also, nothing has really been done to revolutionize any of the fundamentals in desperate need of change.
So when America, Portugal, Spain, UK, Japan and many others crashes and burns, this will mean serious trouble for Sweden.
On the plus side the Swedish government haven’t gone totally crazy with the borrowing, printing and manic spending as many other governments has. Sweden also have a decent savings rate, still bad but not as horrible as the US for example. The current administration also managed to sell off some publically owned companies which lowered the public debt and made a small contribution to a better future. The populace is pretty well educated, company taxes are in comparison low and there’s a history of manufacturing and production that will come in handy.
And maybe most important; Sweden isn’t part of the Euro-zone and has at least some coverage for future pensions, something many continent countries does not.
Presumably our enemies can keep the charade going for an additional year, so let’s assume that the real crash and burn happens during the summer of 2011. If so, Sweden will by then have another government of the more socialist variety which, of course, will make things even worse.
The problem with any government facing such a dire situation is that no matter what they do they are doomed. If they do the wrong thing they will prolong and enhance the crisis, if they do the right thing the crisis may be shortened but their very lives might be in danger.
And so I believe we will get a bi-partisan government just like during World War II. They will announce this as a way of “standing up for Sweden”, “Working for the common good” and with similar baloney. Journalists will celebrate such news and pundits will applaud saying it is necessary to see so called conservatives rule together with so called socialists. All of it will be lies, of course, but they need to show a good face to the public so they avoid the worst riots.
As the crisis rages on and people get more and more frustrated it will lead to more sympathies towards radical –isms’ which will lead to a great upswing in political violence and so the jackhammer from the government will come down harder and harder. The little freedoms we have left will go out the window. You think they are fascists comes to internet today? You think that a couple of cameras are bad? Pfffff… you’ve not seen anything yet.
How it will end? It’s hard to say today, they will never do the right thing, at least not fully, that’s for sure. And people are too stupid to elect any real alternative. But let’s be positive about it and say they partly do the right thing and from the ashes of our industries new companies are created. If that happens and the world hasn’t plummet down into WW III, maybe Sweden will be bouncing upwards again 10-15 years from now. And if so, better equipped and with better fundamentals then most other countries. So it’s not all bad, and maybe, just maybe this suffering generation and the coming generation will have learn that statism, socialism and state planning of the economy doesn’t work.
So, what is the real problem and how can we fix it?
Basically it can be stated that everything our elected frauds have been doing is wrong and mostly the complete opposite of what needs to be done.
When they borrowed shitloads of money - we should instead have cut expenditures. When they cut interest rates down to zero - we should instead have increased it with a couple of percentage. When they printed billions of new bills - we should instead have tightened an already very loose money-policy. When they accumulate debts to scary heights – we should instead have been saving money and/or cutting taxes. And NOT A SINGLE bailout should have been paid out.
Any mainstream economists reading this will start scratching his head and, from his point of view, come to the conclusion I’m either a madman or know nothing of economy, this because in his eyes this would have crashed our economy and started a massive ‘credit-crunch’.
To a degree he would be right. If we would have done what I believe is the right course of action it would have lead to an even worse situation than we had and still find ourselves in. We would also see a massive drop in borrowing, hardly anyone would be buying real-estate and many banks and bad companies would have went out of business. GDP would have dropped with 15-20 percent.
What cornflake economists, Keynesians and mainstream pundits don’t realize is that this is the point!
We need this to purge the system from toxic assets, drive out badly kept companies and ruin horrific fraudulent banks.
And you out there need to realize that the only thing keeping us afloat at the moment is fictitious markets, grossly overvalued alongside ridiculous government policies. When this stuff is withdrawn, which it hast to be, then comes the next bang. Because the problems are still there! They haven’t fixed anything, only swept it under the rug and while doing so worsening the problems.
However, my suggestion wouldn’t all be bad, on the contrary, because if this was implemented savings would go way up which in turn makes money available to investments and real wealth-creation. It would stop all the looting being done from financial institutes and banks. It would create a real market with no bubbles and people would quickly learn to adopt themselves to a non-fictitious way of life.
But the real benefit of this would be that within a year, a year and a half, it would be over. GDP would start going up again, jobs coming back, and new better run banks would take the old ones place and we would close to have eliminate inflation. Within three years Sweden would have been the leading economy adjustable after size and growth.
Sometimes you need to swallow that pill to get better. Sometimes you need to sleep, take a step back or reevaluate a way of life. The medicine might taste bad, but to get back to 100% health that temporarily bitter taste is a necessary evil.
If we after (and during) this crisis sold out all public owned companies, eliminated 97% of all laws and cut taxation in half (or preferably more) we would soon, very soon, be the richest country on the planet. Hopefully we can then take the next step and thrash the central bank as well as the phony fiat money and yet again resort to real money. And then we could write a constitution more direct and much more absolute than the American one, but with the same basic intent. In doing so eliminate the enemy class completely and finally Swedes would be free, happy and much richer than anyone else.
This is all a pipe-dream of course, in reality nothing of this will come to be. But this is the alternative as I see it.
Instead we will live with the boom-and-bust cycles that come with statism. Even IF their scheme were to succeed again i.e. things gets back to ‘normal’, it would only take another couple of years and we would crash again and so on in a never ending circle. We will also have to adjust to fascist internet regulations. We will need to accept that our income continues downward and that the elitists continue to fuck our arses with rusty appliances.
We need a revolution and a complete remodeling of our economy.
To make things clear to you all; our current situation has very little to do with capitalism, but it also has very little to do with the ideology of socialism.
We live in a mixed economy wherein big business, politicians, journalists and banks together rule all. This enemy class with their GramscoFabiaNazi ideology have created or are about to create fascist societies and the only ones that matter are the big, the rich, the powerful and, of course, the government. Statism would probably be the most correct term to use.
There are many socialist solutions being proposed and implemented, but that’s mainly to shut up the far lefties whom, idiots as they are, think they are getting more of their shiny happy fluffy heaven. At the same time the elitists keep some capitalism around, just to have something to loot.
The problem, however, is that sooner or later there’s nothing left to loot and with no one happy and with a totalitarian base the elitists only way out is to resort to violence. And this is the scary and very probable future we’re facing.
Advanced perversions of Europe
Finally mainstream media is getting how screwed Greece is, only a year or more behind those actually paying attention. If it took this long for journalist to realize that the land of the oiled up Spartans are defaulting, well I guess that by this time next year they will write about how UK, Portugal, Japan, Spain etc. is going under. The US will most likely already have crashed by then.
Anyway, the great Messiah of Europe, one of many Glorious Leader’s that always does it for the good of the planet, Gorgon Brownie, was questioned the other day about whether or not British taxpayers will bail out Greece. The squirming non-answer may have something to do with his recent move from his favorite snack, Kit-Kat, over to Bananas. Ingesting his bananas anally, if this being his principle orifice, may explain it, however I suspect that the political reality of lying to his voters is sufficient.
The Swedish Prime Mentalist is against sending Swedish tax money to Greece, but both he and the Gorgon will either pay through EU directly or through IMF. So such statements are complete gibberish. Non-Euro countries will be paying for the failure, whether they like it or not.
The Germans also seem to have given up forcing the Greeks to handle their own problems, and so we are now entering the ‘bailout of Countries’-phase. Maybe the founds will trickle down from IMF - you know those guys that sends tons of cash to dictator Mugabe - and maybe it will be a European thing. After all, it’s a Euro-country; wouldn’t it be bad if the Euro-zone couldn’t handle their own?
But the fun thing is that Greece is only the beginning, something journalists, pundits and politicians either ignore or lie about.
The Greek government is currently struggling with a deficit of 12.7% of GDP, reaching somewhere around a public debt of 120% this year. But Britain’s deficit is currently 11% of GDP, and predictions are that it will reach 12.6% during this year. Is that 0.1% in difference enough to save UK from a country-bailout? If we look at the official National Debt of 68% of GDP, it would seem so. But wait, CPI numbers for UK is actually higher than that of Greece as well as the total British debt of 350% of GDP (second highest in Europe), and the banksters have been deluding themselves and the markets to such a degree that the only thing holding up housing prices at the moment is that banks are BUYING HOUSES FROM THEMSELVES!
But oh, just hold on, it gets a lot better.
Spain has one of the world’s highest unemployment numbers. Although the black labor market is huge, you cannot disregard this fact together with a looming mortgage and housing crisis of extreme levels. Italy is in similar troubles, Belgium likewise.
However the largest problem is only just starting to show itself. Across Europe we have massive amounts of new pensioners leaving the workforce and most (all) of the countries within the Euro-zone have not only spent that pension-money, they’ve also borrowed upon it many times over so the total pensioner-debt is 2-300% of GDP, money needed to be paid out the coming years. Higher taxes and/or cutting in the welfare system will be necessary.
And do I even need to mention the Eastern states, French protectionism and an ever expanding EU-bureaucracy?
Basically the enemy class has ripped out our innards, play with our eyeballs, boil our brains and eaten it for brunch. And then they have done the same to our Childreeeen, and now they have started to suck the marrow from our corpses.
Is it any wonder they want to regulate, control and tax internet before people realize the truth of things?
And what will they do when this entire stimulus, all the printing of freshly scented bills and all the debt accumulation leads to a future where the checks bounce? You see, there’s no leverage left anymore. This is it, the end of the line. They cannot inflate the bubbles more, it’s impossible. They cannot borrow and print more because even their cornflake Keynesian economists know that will not cut it. And in this hilarious situation Greece is only the first country to fail.
Where do you see this going? Do you see happy pinkish clouds surrounding lavish fields of green filled with gold and honey? I didn’t think so…
Anyway, the great Messiah of Europe, one of many Glorious Leader’s that always does it for the good of the planet, Gorgon Brownie, was questioned the other day about whether or not British taxpayers will bail out Greece. The squirming non-answer may have something to do with his recent move from his favorite snack, Kit-Kat, over to Bananas. Ingesting his bananas anally, if this being his principle orifice, may explain it, however I suspect that the political reality of lying to his voters is sufficient.
The Swedish Prime Mentalist is against sending Swedish tax money to Greece, but both he and the Gorgon will either pay through EU directly or through IMF. So such statements are complete gibberish. Non-Euro countries will be paying for the failure, whether they like it or not.
The Germans also seem to have given up forcing the Greeks to handle their own problems, and so we are now entering the ‘bailout of Countries’-phase. Maybe the founds will trickle down from IMF - you know those guys that sends tons of cash to dictator Mugabe - and maybe it will be a European thing. After all, it’s a Euro-country; wouldn’t it be bad if the Euro-zone couldn’t handle their own?
But the fun thing is that Greece is only the beginning, something journalists, pundits and politicians either ignore or lie about.
The Greek government is currently struggling with a deficit of 12.7% of GDP, reaching somewhere around a public debt of 120% this year. But Britain’s deficit is currently 11% of GDP, and predictions are that it will reach 12.6% during this year. Is that 0.1% in difference enough to save UK from a country-bailout? If we look at the official National Debt of 68% of GDP, it would seem so. But wait, CPI numbers for UK is actually higher than that of Greece as well as the total British debt of 350% of GDP (second highest in Europe), and the banksters have been deluding themselves and the markets to such a degree that the only thing holding up housing prices at the moment is that banks are BUYING HOUSES FROM THEMSELVES!
But oh, just hold on, it gets a lot better.
Spain has one of the world’s highest unemployment numbers. Although the black labor market is huge, you cannot disregard this fact together with a looming mortgage and housing crisis of extreme levels. Italy is in similar troubles, Belgium likewise.
However the largest problem is only just starting to show itself. Across Europe we have massive amounts of new pensioners leaving the workforce and most (all) of the countries within the Euro-zone have not only spent that pension-money, they’ve also borrowed upon it many times over so the total pensioner-debt is 2-300% of GDP, money needed to be paid out the coming years. Higher taxes and/or cutting in the welfare system will be necessary.
And do I even need to mention the Eastern states, French protectionism and an ever expanding EU-bureaucracy?
Basically the enemy class has ripped out our innards, play with our eyeballs, boil our brains and eaten it for brunch. And then they have done the same to our Childreeeen, and now they have started to suck the marrow from our corpses.
Is it any wonder they want to regulate, control and tax internet before people realize the truth of things?
And what will they do when this entire stimulus, all the printing of freshly scented bills and all the debt accumulation leads to a future where the checks bounce? You see, there’s no leverage left anymore. This is it, the end of the line. They cannot inflate the bubbles more, it’s impossible. They cannot borrow and print more because even their cornflake Keynesian economists know that will not cut it. And in this hilarious situation Greece is only the first country to fail.
Where do you see this going? Do you see happy pinkish clouds surrounding lavish fields of green filled with gold and honey? I didn’t think so…
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Iran
At the same time as killed Swedish soldiers touched down on home soil and their true killers, those sitting at parliament still are free to walk around, people in Iran are chanting "Allah o Akbar", (God is Great) in the night before the 31st anniversary of the Islamic revolution.
The Middle East is a large battle ground at the moment and tomorrow the people of Iran are set to attend massive national gatherings to commemorate the revolution. Not that I particularly supported that revolution, but hopefully it can fuel protests tomorrow as well as pictures like this of Neda:
To no surprise it appears that Internet connections in Iran are apparently grinding to a halt ahead of upcoming anti-government protests. Officially, the Iranian government is blaming it on the fact that "part of the fibre-optic network is damaged."
Riiiiight…
Ever wondered why your own government wants to control, regulate and tax internet? Well, this one large reason, the other one is of course to control our mindset and the information flow in general.
The Middle East is a large battle ground at the moment and tomorrow the people of Iran are set to attend massive national gatherings to commemorate the revolution. Not that I particularly supported that revolution, but hopefully it can fuel protests tomorrow as well as pictures like this of Neda:
To no surprise it appears that Internet connections in Iran are apparently grinding to a halt ahead of upcoming anti-government protests. Officially, the Iranian government is blaming it on the fact that "part of the fibre-optic network is damaged."
Riiiiight…
Ever wondered why your own government wants to control, regulate and tax internet? Well, this one large reason, the other one is of course to control our mindset and the information flow in general.
copier machine game II
I guess I’m not the only one watching central bank people all over the world having so much fun and feeling a bit jealous about it?
They get to play with colors, numbers and hand out pieces of paper that people for some reason use to exchange goods with. So I’ve decided to create some pointers how to construct the exact same game.
First you need to go out and buy a copier machine.
Do not assume that buying a copier machine with tons of features means that you will be paying for unnecessary options. So many features are built into digital machines these days that the "extra" features may have little to no impact on price. Just make sure you stick to your requirements. You could also go for that computer you only need to press a couple of buttons on, but I find that a copier machine have more charming attributes.
After you’ve picked up the right machine, select some pieces of paper, preferably paper with nice colors. Always more fun with bright and shiny paper, but remember to have several different papers with a couple of different colors. Then figure out some cool name for your money. Let’s call our money “The Sheople’s money”, it’s just a name, don’t worry about it, you can call it whatever you like. Well, it could lead to some confusion if you pick names already taken, such as Dollar, Pound, Krona, Euro etc. but otherwise it do not really matter.
Then pick a couple of numbers to write on the pieces of papers you bought. Let’s write ‘Sheople 10’ on the red ones ‘Sheople 50’ on the blue and ‘Sheople 100’ on green ones.
Before you do anything else, go and join up with Hells Angels and create together with them a protection agency. After all, only you should be printing money and if anyone else print money, you need to “show them the right way”.
Now, let’s start printing!
When you have a couple of fine piles of those newly printed pieces of papers, hand them out in your neighborhood to people and use any persuasion tactic to get them to start using your paper as currency. Bikers standing by in the background, pointing a gun at someone’s head or burning down a couple of stores is usually enough to get friends and neighbors to accept your currency.
And now comes the first really fun part. Playing with numbers, colors and the printer is fun, but to continue doing the same is even funnier. Especially when you do it all the time, no matter what the problem is.
Prices rise on food? Print more money. People are losing their jobs? Print more money. People can’t afford their homes anymore? Print more money. And when your community “needs" to borrow money from another neighborhood, you can also print more money to buy those debts which means that once again your monopoly money saves the day. A copy machine to the rescue! Almost like a superhero isn’t it?
You can also take out a high salary for doing all this to your friends and neighbors. After all, you are the hero with some pieces of papers that has arbitrary chosen numbers on them.
But please also remember that in all neighborhoods there are troublemakers. Like that pesky shop owner at the corner who insists on raising his prices higher then you like, but cheerfully enough you can put him back on the right track with the help of some bikers. And then there are a couple of women that seem to be using gold instead of your pieces of paper. They are probably tired of using more and more paper and getting less and less for them, but hey, that’s not your problem. Send bikers on them too!
Now, you have a society deeply in debt with ever increasing prices and inhabitants that’s not really doing as they have been told. Some business has also gone down with more people not working as consequence and some of your neighborhoods debts owners are also having some problems. You have entered a recession.
What do you do then… let’s think about it…oh, I know! You print more money! And then you can use this new money to increase spending to hide any debts as well as use it to publically employ slackers and lazy bums. And while you are at it, remember to also borrow even more money from other neighbors.
We can call this the “Weimar republic”-game or “Zimbabwe showed us the way”-game.
It’s a great way to spend a couple of years. Especially when you also can play, at the same time, games like: “I know best what to eat, drink, and inhale” – game and that fantastically funny: “Let’s send more printed money to banks in the neighborhood but only to them”-game. In combination with making the best use of Hells Angels bone cracking skills, you have lots of fun ahead of you. Just remember; keep that smile on your face!
If you don’t get it, this is EXACTLY what governments and central banks are doing.
They get to play with colors, numbers and hand out pieces of paper that people for some reason use to exchange goods with. So I’ve decided to create some pointers how to construct the exact same game.
First you need to go out and buy a copier machine.
Do not assume that buying a copier machine with tons of features means that you will be paying for unnecessary options. So many features are built into digital machines these days that the "extra" features may have little to no impact on price. Just make sure you stick to your requirements. You could also go for that computer you only need to press a couple of buttons on, but I find that a copier machine have more charming attributes.
After you’ve picked up the right machine, select some pieces of paper, preferably paper with nice colors. Always more fun with bright and shiny paper, but remember to have several different papers with a couple of different colors. Then figure out some cool name for your money. Let’s call our money “The Sheople’s money”, it’s just a name, don’t worry about it, you can call it whatever you like. Well, it could lead to some confusion if you pick names already taken, such as Dollar, Pound, Krona, Euro etc. but otherwise it do not really matter.
Then pick a couple of numbers to write on the pieces of papers you bought. Let’s write ‘Sheople 10’ on the red ones ‘Sheople 50’ on the blue and ‘Sheople 100’ on green ones.
Before you do anything else, go and join up with Hells Angels and create together with them a protection agency. After all, only you should be printing money and if anyone else print money, you need to “show them the right way”.
Now, let’s start printing!
When you have a couple of fine piles of those newly printed pieces of papers, hand them out in your neighborhood to people and use any persuasion tactic to get them to start using your paper as currency. Bikers standing by in the background, pointing a gun at someone’s head or burning down a couple of stores is usually enough to get friends and neighbors to accept your currency.
And now comes the first really fun part. Playing with numbers, colors and the printer is fun, but to continue doing the same is even funnier. Especially when you do it all the time, no matter what the problem is.
Prices rise on food? Print more money. People are losing their jobs? Print more money. People can’t afford their homes anymore? Print more money. And when your community “needs" to borrow money from another neighborhood, you can also print more money to buy those debts which means that once again your monopoly money saves the day. A copy machine to the rescue! Almost like a superhero isn’t it?
You can also take out a high salary for doing all this to your friends and neighbors. After all, you are the hero with some pieces of papers that has arbitrary chosen numbers on them.
But please also remember that in all neighborhoods there are troublemakers. Like that pesky shop owner at the corner who insists on raising his prices higher then you like, but cheerfully enough you can put him back on the right track with the help of some bikers. And then there are a couple of women that seem to be using gold instead of your pieces of paper. They are probably tired of using more and more paper and getting less and less for them, but hey, that’s not your problem. Send bikers on them too!
Now, you have a society deeply in debt with ever increasing prices and inhabitants that’s not really doing as they have been told. Some business has also gone down with more people not working as consequence and some of your neighborhoods debts owners are also having some problems. You have entered a recession.
What do you do then… let’s think about it…oh, I know! You print more money! And then you can use this new money to increase spending to hide any debts as well as use it to publically employ slackers and lazy bums. And while you are at it, remember to also borrow even more money from other neighbors.
We can call this the “Weimar republic”-game or “Zimbabwe showed us the way”-game.
It’s a great way to spend a couple of years. Especially when you also can play, at the same time, games like: “I know best what to eat, drink, and inhale” – game and that fantastically funny: “Let’s send more printed money to banks in the neighborhood but only to them”-game. In combination with making the best use of Hells Angels bone cracking skills, you have lots of fun ahead of you. Just remember; keep that smile on your face!
If you don’t get it, this is EXACTLY what governments and central banks are doing.
The Bubble Bobble game
Before reading, press play:
The signs and the math cannot be clearer; we are in the bubble of all bubbles, the mother of all inflated balloons ever seen.
When the markets crashed back in the spring of 2009 it was the bursting of several bubbles that lead to that situation. Very cheap credits in combination with artificially low interest rates and government intervention on many key markets had since the dot.com bubble crashed propped up markets to ridiculous levels. Debts had soured, wars had been fought, government entities like Fanny and Freddie had committed fraudulent deals, derivatives had emerged as the new thing, banksters had fooled markets, and Wall Street had got drunk - and so on.
And what did our saviors do to stop everything from crashing down?
They started up the printing presses in order to throw trillions out to financial institutes, they lowered interest rates down to zero, and they borrowed trillions from each other to spend, spend and spend. They bailed-out failing companies (carefully chosen ones…), they went out together to urge everyone to take out their money, raid that piggy and borrow like never before so people could be buying stuff again. All in all they sort of ‘succeeded’, and with that I mean they managed to inflate the bubbles one more time.
The crisis was temporarily diverted, but now the debts are bigger than ever before, the commando currencies has never been shakier, markets are overvalued by as much as 50%, housing prices have been going up in most countries when they should be going down, protectionism haven’t been this bad for many decades and inflation have started to tick away.
The hero of this cornflake-induced economic idiocy, Robert Mugabe, knows what’s next, but the question is; do you?
In the meanwhile our banksters are throwing bonuses around like nothing has happened. The criminals of the banking cartels should in many cases stand trial, but instead their actions are expectant by political decisions while the same politicians officially are saying they will crack down on the same bonuses they themselves have been encouraging. And most of you sheople out there seem to be buying this hoax.
In the end the math doesn’t tell lies.
The fundamentals aren’t sound, wealth creation is on its way down and the mother of all bubbles has been inflated to a point of no return. We’re facing a depression on such a scale that we will need to look in the book of revelations to find proper adjectives. Tens of millions of people will die from starvation, riots and civil unrests, and that’s only the first stage. The crashes that will occur sooner than you think will dwarf anything ever seen on this planet.
Are you prepared?
If not, take a look at Greece or Iceland, that’s what’s in store for most of the world but on a much grander scale.
The signs and the math cannot be clearer; we are in the bubble of all bubbles, the mother of all inflated balloons ever seen.
When the markets crashed back in the spring of 2009 it was the bursting of several bubbles that lead to that situation. Very cheap credits in combination with artificially low interest rates and government intervention on many key markets had since the dot.com bubble crashed propped up markets to ridiculous levels. Debts had soured, wars had been fought, government entities like Fanny and Freddie had committed fraudulent deals, derivatives had emerged as the new thing, banksters had fooled markets, and Wall Street had got drunk - and so on.
And what did our saviors do to stop everything from crashing down?
They started up the printing presses in order to throw trillions out to financial institutes, they lowered interest rates down to zero, and they borrowed trillions from each other to spend, spend and spend. They bailed-out failing companies (carefully chosen ones…), they went out together to urge everyone to take out their money, raid that piggy and borrow like never before so people could be buying stuff again. All in all they sort of ‘succeeded’, and with that I mean they managed to inflate the bubbles one more time.
The crisis was temporarily diverted, but now the debts are bigger than ever before, the commando currencies has never been shakier, markets are overvalued by as much as 50%, housing prices have been going up in most countries when they should be going down, protectionism haven’t been this bad for many decades and inflation have started to tick away.
The hero of this cornflake-induced economic idiocy, Robert Mugabe, knows what’s next, but the question is; do you?
In the meanwhile our banksters are throwing bonuses around like nothing has happened. The criminals of the banking cartels should in many cases stand trial, but instead their actions are expectant by political decisions while the same politicians officially are saying they will crack down on the same bonuses they themselves have been encouraging. And most of you sheople out there seem to be buying this hoax.
In the end the math doesn’t tell lies.
The fundamentals aren’t sound, wealth creation is on its way down and the mother of all bubbles has been inflated to a point of no return. We’re facing a depression on such a scale that we will need to look in the book of revelations to find proper adjectives. Tens of millions of people will die from starvation, riots and civil unrests, and that’s only the first stage. The crashes that will occur sooner than you think will dwarf anything ever seen on this planet.
Are you prepared?
If not, take a look at Greece or Iceland, that’s what’s in store for most of the world but on a much grander scale.
Any believer left?
They are running scared. Their plans for installing a world wide web of lies from which they could tax, regulate and control people have been exposed so many times now that anything the elitists say fall flat.
Climategate, Himalayagate, Pachaurigate, Glaciergate, Hurricanegate, Amazonasgate and NOAAgate — it’s hard to keep up with all the revelations and allegations buzzing around some of the biggest names in climate science. Hardly a day goes by without their frauds getting exposed.
And their reaction? Well they tried to call a press conference in Washington recently. The conference by NOAA was supposed to be about “earlier snowmelt and extended ice-free seasons”, but it had to be postponed because of the heaviest snowfall in decades…
It’s hard to make this stuff up.
Remember how delegates outside the Fraudenhagen talks were freezing their feet’s off while mumbling between frosty clouds to some reporter and stating how global warming have increased temperatures?
Okay, I need to admit, the fact that we are facing the coldest and snowiest winter I have ever experienced in my life doesn’t say that much. Just as a couple of very warm years doesn’t say anything either. You see in order to measure real climate changes and really get good data one needs to look at geological, biological and historical data over thousands of years. To only look at the latest 120 years or so (as the climate frauds are mostly doing) isn’t science, that’s guesswork at best. Any real scientists studying this planets climate can tell you that anything below thousand years in data is pretty useless.
But that’s not what the tricksters are saying now is it?
Still, even with this in mind it is hard not to laugh at the overpaid, bought for and deceitful government hired ‘scientists’ when they get caught lying over and over again.
Many years ago I figured out what the real agenda is, all on my own, only reading and making my own conclusions. No oil-company paid me to search for any form of validity, no big business gave me stuff to follow scary claims to their origin, no heartless rich banker in top-hat hired me to look into what UN and other entities have said.
You know what I found?
– That not a single one of the alarmists ideas or claims holds, not a single one.
I still haven’t found a single argument that holds, there’s no fact supporting the notion of manmade global warming, there’s no evidence, no science, nothing, nada, nil, zilch.
I challenge you to try. Pick up one of their claims, anyone of them. Go out and look, read, search, Google, whatever. Just try to find proof, scientific facts and irrefutable evidence that proves them right. You will not find anything, because it doesn’t exist, but please do try.
We actually do know what affect our climate. It has been scientifically proven and it is a well tested fact that THE SUN is the main culprit to a degree of about 99%. Even the most scary doomsday alarmist with their arms around a mahogany tree will admit this. We also know that cosmic rays and the oceans make up most of that additional 1%. And we also know that volcanoes spit out more carbondioxid and other gases each week than all factories and cars on the planet do during a year. If the powers that be really were concern for the environment and greenhouse gases being let out in the atmosphere they would hurry to outlaw volcanic activity.
I cannot really see how they can keep this scam going. The manmade global warming idea is the biggest hoax of all time and they cannot hide that anymore. Much of the credit for exposing this fraud goes to internet and internet users, which is yet another reason for the elitists to crack down on the free information flow.
Another thing I would like all you still believing out there to do is to follow the money. I would argue that the manmade global warming hoax is mainly about power and control, another way for the elitists to be in charge of everyday life, but it is also about money, lots and lots of money.
If you check out how billions upon billions have been diverted to ‘scientists’ researching this scam. If you fully understand that certain banks and a couple of big corporations have invested so much money and stand to gain so much more on this scam. If you really get to know the entertainers parading in front of the cameras and fully understand how deep their pockets are. If you really follow the money, you’ll soon realize what’s at stake here for the enemy class.
And third thing I would like you to do is to keep an eye out for their next scam. Remember the Ozone layer and how it was supposed to have killed us all by now? Remember how they believed just a couple of decades ago that we were heading for a new ice-age? Y2K anyone?
Believe me, even if the manmade global warming trickery have been exposed, they will soon find another scenario to scare us with. Maybe it will be Aliens, asteroids hurling towards earth, Magnetic polar shift, Yellowstone erupting or any other number of fears, but you can count on them finding such claims and selling it to easily duped sheople.
My only question is; why does anyone believe anything coming from the elitists?
Climategate, Himalayagate, Pachaurigate, Glaciergate, Hurricanegate, Amazonasgate and NOAAgate — it’s hard to keep up with all the revelations and allegations buzzing around some of the biggest names in climate science. Hardly a day goes by without their frauds getting exposed.
And their reaction? Well they tried to call a press conference in Washington recently. The conference by NOAA was supposed to be about “earlier snowmelt and extended ice-free seasons”, but it had to be postponed because of the heaviest snowfall in decades…
It’s hard to make this stuff up.
Remember how delegates outside the Fraudenhagen talks were freezing their feet’s off while mumbling between frosty clouds to some reporter and stating how global warming have increased temperatures?
Okay, I need to admit, the fact that we are facing the coldest and snowiest winter I have ever experienced in my life doesn’t say that much. Just as a couple of very warm years doesn’t say anything either. You see in order to measure real climate changes and really get good data one needs to look at geological, biological and historical data over thousands of years. To only look at the latest 120 years or so (as the climate frauds are mostly doing) isn’t science, that’s guesswork at best. Any real scientists studying this planets climate can tell you that anything below thousand years in data is pretty useless.
But that’s not what the tricksters are saying now is it?
Still, even with this in mind it is hard not to laugh at the overpaid, bought for and deceitful government hired ‘scientists’ when they get caught lying over and over again.
Many years ago I figured out what the real agenda is, all on my own, only reading and making my own conclusions. No oil-company paid me to search for any form of validity, no big business gave me stuff to follow scary claims to their origin, no heartless rich banker in top-hat hired me to look into what UN and other entities have said.
You know what I found?
– That not a single one of the alarmists ideas or claims holds, not a single one.
I still haven’t found a single argument that holds, there’s no fact supporting the notion of manmade global warming, there’s no evidence, no science, nothing, nada, nil, zilch.
I challenge you to try. Pick up one of their claims, anyone of them. Go out and look, read, search, Google, whatever. Just try to find proof, scientific facts and irrefutable evidence that proves them right. You will not find anything, because it doesn’t exist, but please do try.
We actually do know what affect our climate. It has been scientifically proven and it is a well tested fact that THE SUN is the main culprit to a degree of about 99%. Even the most scary doomsday alarmist with their arms around a mahogany tree will admit this. We also know that cosmic rays and the oceans make up most of that additional 1%. And we also know that volcanoes spit out more carbondioxid and other gases each week than all factories and cars on the planet do during a year. If the powers that be really were concern for the environment and greenhouse gases being let out in the atmosphere they would hurry to outlaw volcanic activity.
I cannot really see how they can keep this scam going. The manmade global warming idea is the biggest hoax of all time and they cannot hide that anymore. Much of the credit for exposing this fraud goes to internet and internet users, which is yet another reason for the elitists to crack down on the free information flow.
Another thing I would like all you still believing out there to do is to follow the money. I would argue that the manmade global warming hoax is mainly about power and control, another way for the elitists to be in charge of everyday life, but it is also about money, lots and lots of money.
If you check out how billions upon billions have been diverted to ‘scientists’ researching this scam. If you fully understand that certain banks and a couple of big corporations have invested so much money and stand to gain so much more on this scam. If you really get to know the entertainers parading in front of the cameras and fully understand how deep their pockets are. If you really follow the money, you’ll soon realize what’s at stake here for the enemy class.
And third thing I would like you to do is to keep an eye out for their next scam. Remember the Ozone layer and how it was supposed to have killed us all by now? Remember how they believed just a couple of decades ago that we were heading for a new ice-age? Y2K anyone?
Believe me, even if the manmade global warming trickery have been exposed, they will soon find another scenario to scare us with. Maybe it will be Aliens, asteroids hurling towards earth, Magnetic polar shift, Yellowstone erupting or any other number of fears, but you can count on them finding such claims and selling it to easily duped sheople.
My only question is; why does anyone believe anything coming from the elitists?
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Stop the fascist infestation
I don't always like Alex Jones, but this is an important message and something you really should listen to.
Cocksniffing and other crimes
Swedish officials aren’t pleased with the canon-fodder already in place in Afghanistan with substandard equipment, and so, of course, they’ve decided to send some more troops down to a conflict Sweden has not a single thing to do with.
Apparently we are there “to help”. Not to help the American coalition of war-criminals, oh no, and we are certainly not there to help grow drugs or make terrorist organizations stronger, definitely not, and of course we’re not there to assist a non-democratic woman-hating corrupt regime. This is what we are actually doing, but the facts are ignored.
Instead we get some stories filled with mamby pamby boohooing worthy of any Oscar. When the media show us Swedish soldiers they are helping. A couple of kids that has lost their family to American warplanes gets candy, a stray dog get some water and of course our heroes are confiscating drugs while handing out food and aid to the locals.
Any camel-fellating or shady deals going on in the background is ignored.
If we really are supposed to help, if we really want to win this so called war, why aren’t we sending tens of thousands of soldiers down there? Why aren’t we urging the Americans to use tactical nukes or really put the pressure on? Why won’t we actually act with force, determination and conviction? If we did, the conflict would be over very soon. Since we’re not, the only conclusion anyone with working synapses can draw is that they don’t want to win. Probably with the intention to create more terrorists so when they bomb our cities our masters can impose more of those fascist regulations that are so fun.
Are we really so bent to walk behind British and American unlawful combat-boats?
Is it a phallus thing?
Maybe they just feel that war is fantastic?
Well, While killing people you get phallus shaped rockets and phallus shaped amo fired from phallus shaped rocket-launchers and phallus shaped airplanes. And those phallus thingies go flying through the air making big holes in the sand. Playing with toys that go “boom” is fun shit, too bad some Muslims need to die in the process. Oh well, that can be fun that too. I mean, body parts flying, kids getting their legs cut off, women getting raped, families dying from starvation, millions of refugees. Yapp, great fun...
I’ve been against Swedish (and all the others) participation from the start. Maybe, just maybe USA have some reason to be there, if we believe in the official story, but the rest?
We are dying from a fascist cancer at home, and the only answer we get from on up high is more regulations and more taxes. Why are we sending our people to a foreign land to defend some elusive freedom when our own freedom is deteriorating every day? Why spend money we actually don’t have on a conflict we have nothing to do with when unemployment is very high? Why pretend to want to save female rights when we cannot protect those at home? And even IF those are valid reasons, why the hell aren’t we fighting ‘the good fight’ in any number of other countries with similar or worse regimes that exists around the globe?
Apparently we are there “to help”. Not to help the American coalition of war-criminals, oh no, and we are certainly not there to help grow drugs or make terrorist organizations stronger, definitely not, and of course we’re not there to assist a non-democratic woman-hating corrupt regime. This is what we are actually doing, but the facts are ignored.
Instead we get some stories filled with mamby pamby boohooing worthy of any Oscar. When the media show us Swedish soldiers they are helping. A couple of kids that has lost their family to American warplanes gets candy, a stray dog get some water and of course our heroes are confiscating drugs while handing out food and aid to the locals.
Any camel-fellating or shady deals going on in the background is ignored.
If we really are supposed to help, if we really want to win this so called war, why aren’t we sending tens of thousands of soldiers down there? Why aren’t we urging the Americans to use tactical nukes or really put the pressure on? Why won’t we actually act with force, determination and conviction? If we did, the conflict would be over very soon. Since we’re not, the only conclusion anyone with working synapses can draw is that they don’t want to win. Probably with the intention to create more terrorists so when they bomb our cities our masters can impose more of those fascist regulations that are so fun.
Are we really so bent to walk behind British and American unlawful combat-boats?
Is it a phallus thing?
Maybe they just feel that war is fantastic?
Well, While killing people you get phallus shaped rockets and phallus shaped amo fired from phallus shaped rocket-launchers and phallus shaped airplanes. And those phallus thingies go flying through the air making big holes in the sand. Playing with toys that go “boom” is fun shit, too bad some Muslims need to die in the process. Oh well, that can be fun that too. I mean, body parts flying, kids getting their legs cut off, women getting raped, families dying from starvation, millions of refugees. Yapp, great fun...
I’ve been against Swedish (and all the others) participation from the start. Maybe, just maybe USA have some reason to be there, if we believe in the official story, but the rest?
We are dying from a fascist cancer at home, and the only answer we get from on up high is more regulations and more taxes. Why are we sending our people to a foreign land to defend some elusive freedom when our own freedom is deteriorating every day? Why spend money we actually don’t have on a conflict we have nothing to do with when unemployment is very high? Why pretend to want to save female rights when we cannot protect those at home? And even IF those are valid reasons, why the hell aren’t we fighting ‘the good fight’ in any number of other countries with similar or worse regimes that exists around the globe?
From the diaries of politics
The government own and controlled Scandinavian airline SAS has announced a new share issue to raise 5 billion kronor ($674 million) as well as a program of cuts and savings designed to save a further 2 billion kronor.
For some reason the current Swedish government, lefties and Keynesians as they are, have decided to buy some of those shares, further making the Swedish people pay for a useless company going down. SAS is among the most expensive (maybe the most expensive) airline out there, their service is lousy and they rarely have the coverage I find useable. Basically it’s a crappy company.
Some have argued that government should take ownership responsibility, but what about responsibility to the tax payers? The voters? The horrible institution of SAS should be sold or go through bankruptcy, which would be the responsible thing to do.
This is what happens when you let politicians control and dictate policies within a company, it goes bad and then taxes need to be thrown at it to “save it”. Not to mention the unfair advantage of getting billions whenever needed...
For some reason the current Swedish government, lefties and Keynesians as they are, have decided to buy some of those shares, further making the Swedish people pay for a useless company going down. SAS is among the most expensive (maybe the most expensive) airline out there, their service is lousy and they rarely have the coverage I find useable. Basically it’s a crappy company.
Some have argued that government should take ownership responsibility, but what about responsibility to the tax payers? The voters? The horrible institution of SAS should be sold or go through bankruptcy, which would be the responsible thing to do.
This is what happens when you let politicians control and dictate policies within a company, it goes bad and then taxes need to be thrown at it to “save it”. Not to mention the unfair advantage of getting billions whenever needed...
Monday, February 8, 2010
Death by government
While the American killing-machine rages on, journalists are trying their very best to keep the Swedish people thinking it’s a good thing for Swedish soldiers to die in a conflict Sweden has nothing to do with.
For some reason it is great that Swedes die on the other side of the world. Probably because, after all, they are protecting a corrupt non-democratic women hating regime and supporting the never ending struggle to murder families and making hundreds of thousands into orphans. How can you not love that?
Or how about the flourishing drug trade that never before has shown such profits? Gotto support that, right? How about the fact that during the 7+ years the world’s strongest navy/army/air force with the world’s most comprehensible intelligence service has ONLY manage to do one thing; create more enemies!
As usual mainstream media are devoted to what the elitists want them to write and say.
Do you know how many wars that have been declared between companies? Between black and white people? Between Women and their children? The answer is; not a single one.
Throughout history the people, not matter who they’ve been, has never declared a single war. You know who has? Government. Government alone has the power to instigate violence against other races or another country. Government alone also is the only entity that has the power to instigate violence against its own citizens.
Death by government – historically speaking, this is the most common way to die
This is also why lefties complaining over the Afghani conflict are only covering up what they really think. Socialism is per definition a government loving ideology. Socialism means more power to authorities and since government is the only entity ‘allowed’ to start wars… well, you probably see were I’m going with that one…
And so the Swedish government has again helped out with the murder of two Swedes. Anyone surprised by this? Our government murders people every day through too high taxation, too overzealous regulations, anti-drug laws, through the manmade global warming scam and countless of other schemes said to protect and help us. As usual politicians only show one hand while hiding the darker, more sinister murderous hand behind their back.
Yes, I know these soldiers volunteered for their assignment and as it seems it may even have been Afghani police that killed them. Those Afghani officers seem to be shooting at everything that moves and reports stream in all the time about civilians getting killed by their own. But does that really matter? It is the Swedish government, with aid and support from all within the elitist agenda that has found it suitable to send soldiers to help US troops slaughter hundreds of thousands of Muslims.
Death by government – why won’t people ever learn?
And even the so called peace-activists that appall any warring have nothing against violence and people getting murdered by authorities. The very same people who say it is wrong to send troops into Afghanistan and is against all form of conflict were two armed opponents are fighting don’t mind to send government thugs to people’s homes in order to jail , hurt and sometimes kill unarmed countrymen.
How many citizens haven’t had their houses confiscated, been shoot by the police or got incarcerated for victimless crimes? Many thousands have this done to them each year just because government is armed, but the normal inhabitant isn’t.
If you don’t believe me, try to stop paying your taxes, refuse conscription or say no to all the mad traffic laws. I mean really stand up for yourself - do you think for a second that your own government has any quandary over beating you down, locking you up and/or hurt you? And if you resist, you can get killed. All of us live under this threat every day, at any second government hired gangsters can storm your home and do whatever they want with you and your property. This is a fact and if you haven’t got that, you live in a different universe far, far away from reality.
Death by government…
My question is; is it worth it?
How many of your countrymen are supposed to die in foreign lands or get murdered by government before you had enough? Is your welfare check so precious to you that you have nothing against the government robbing and maybe kill your neighbor for that money?
It all comes down to the fact that every time you argue for government intervention, no matter how small or how righteous you think it is, you’re really saying you want the government to steal, plunder, hurt, and possible murder for the sake of your opinion. This is the very essence of any moral question ever asked.
Should we mourn the dead soldiers? Absolutely. Should we support their families? Completely! And as long as they are there our soldiers should have the best equipment possible. But that doesn’t change the fact that their blood is on the hands of the politicians that rule us. Sure it may have been an Afghani holding the gun, but if it wasn’t for political decisions, they wouldn’t have been there in the first place.
And let me ask you this: if your only source of income is taken away from you by foreign troops that are, at least indirectly, supporting the war against many of your own people, wouldn’t you be inclined to kill? If your family may die and several of your relatives are hurting, starving, losing limbs and it can to a large degree be traced back to the soldiers said to be there to ‘help you’, wouldn’t you be a little pissed?
We do hear good sounding arguments for us being there, the powers that be always conjure them up, but if those reasons are the ones that made us go there, why aren’t we in China? Sudan? Why aren’t we sending troops to Venezuela? To Mozambique or Indonesia?
A mad Texan religious chimp asked us to go there, and a Marxist lunatic bent on destroying the world economy wants us to stay, is that good enough for you?
Not to me, not in my name!
For some reason it is great that Swedes die on the other side of the world. Probably because, after all, they are protecting a corrupt non-democratic women hating regime and supporting the never ending struggle to murder families and making hundreds of thousands into orphans. How can you not love that?
Or how about the flourishing drug trade that never before has shown such profits? Gotto support that, right? How about the fact that during the 7+ years the world’s strongest navy/army/air force with the world’s most comprehensible intelligence service has ONLY manage to do one thing; create more enemies!
As usual mainstream media are devoted to what the elitists want them to write and say.
Do you know how many wars that have been declared between companies? Between black and white people? Between Women and their children? The answer is; not a single one.
Throughout history the people, not matter who they’ve been, has never declared a single war. You know who has? Government. Government alone has the power to instigate violence against other races or another country. Government alone also is the only entity that has the power to instigate violence against its own citizens.
Death by government – historically speaking, this is the most common way to die
This is also why lefties complaining over the Afghani conflict are only covering up what they really think. Socialism is per definition a government loving ideology. Socialism means more power to authorities and since government is the only entity ‘allowed’ to start wars… well, you probably see were I’m going with that one…
And so the Swedish government has again helped out with the murder of two Swedes. Anyone surprised by this? Our government murders people every day through too high taxation, too overzealous regulations, anti-drug laws, through the manmade global warming scam and countless of other schemes said to protect and help us. As usual politicians only show one hand while hiding the darker, more sinister murderous hand behind their back.
Yes, I know these soldiers volunteered for their assignment and as it seems it may even have been Afghani police that killed them. Those Afghani officers seem to be shooting at everything that moves and reports stream in all the time about civilians getting killed by their own. But does that really matter? It is the Swedish government, with aid and support from all within the elitist agenda that has found it suitable to send soldiers to help US troops slaughter hundreds of thousands of Muslims.
Death by government – why won’t people ever learn?
And even the so called peace-activists that appall any warring have nothing against violence and people getting murdered by authorities. The very same people who say it is wrong to send troops into Afghanistan and is against all form of conflict were two armed opponents are fighting don’t mind to send government thugs to people’s homes in order to jail , hurt and sometimes kill unarmed countrymen.
How many citizens haven’t had their houses confiscated, been shoot by the police or got incarcerated for victimless crimes? Many thousands have this done to them each year just because government is armed, but the normal inhabitant isn’t.
If you don’t believe me, try to stop paying your taxes, refuse conscription or say no to all the mad traffic laws. I mean really stand up for yourself - do you think for a second that your own government has any quandary over beating you down, locking you up and/or hurt you? And if you resist, you can get killed. All of us live under this threat every day, at any second government hired gangsters can storm your home and do whatever they want with you and your property. This is a fact and if you haven’t got that, you live in a different universe far, far away from reality.
Death by government…
My question is; is it worth it?
How many of your countrymen are supposed to die in foreign lands or get murdered by government before you had enough? Is your welfare check so precious to you that you have nothing against the government robbing and maybe kill your neighbor for that money?
It all comes down to the fact that every time you argue for government intervention, no matter how small or how righteous you think it is, you’re really saying you want the government to steal, plunder, hurt, and possible murder for the sake of your opinion. This is the very essence of any moral question ever asked.
Should we mourn the dead soldiers? Absolutely. Should we support their families? Completely! And as long as they are there our soldiers should have the best equipment possible. But that doesn’t change the fact that their blood is on the hands of the politicians that rule us. Sure it may have been an Afghani holding the gun, but if it wasn’t for political decisions, they wouldn’t have been there in the first place.
And let me ask you this: if your only source of income is taken away from you by foreign troops that are, at least indirectly, supporting the war against many of your own people, wouldn’t you be inclined to kill? If your family may die and several of your relatives are hurting, starving, losing limbs and it can to a large degree be traced back to the soldiers said to be there to ‘help you’, wouldn’t you be a little pissed?
We do hear good sounding arguments for us being there, the powers that be always conjure them up, but if those reasons are the ones that made us go there, why aren’t we in China? Sudan? Why aren’t we sending troops to Venezuela? To Mozambique or Indonesia?
A mad Texan religious chimp asked us to go there, and a Marxist lunatic bent on destroying the world economy wants us to stay, is that good enough for you?
Not to me, not in my name!
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Quake update
Lots of earthquakes around the globe above 5.0 on the Richter scale today. Strongest I’ve noticed is Magnitude 5.8 – South of the Fiji Islands. Every time my browser shakes and I can imagine people running around scared. How funny isn’t that?
UPPDATE: Another one around the Fiji Islands just now, 5.9 (revised down to 5.3... go figure..) this time. Something going on out there? Lower depth though, so probably not...
UPPDATE: Another one around the Fiji Islands just now, 5.9 (revised down to 5.3... go figure..) this time. Something going on out there? Lower depth though, so probably not...
Conservatism, ideology and Afghanistan
Being reached by the news that Swedish soldiers have died my first reaction is to feel both sad and proud at the same time. Sad over their families, proud over Swedes fighting for human rights and dying while doing so...
But that only last a second or so - my conservative vein beats shortly.
The problems with conservative thinking are; too much nationalism, too much pride over being whatever you are. And that conservative vein also beat to the wing-flaps of history, tradition and Christian values. Unintentionally this leads to the dark side of collectivism and builds that ‘we against them’ feeling.
So after that second or two I realize why the soldiers really died and I get angry.
Angry because we have no reason being there, none whatsoever.
No one has attacked Sweden. No terrorists have bombed our citizens. No Afghanis have attacked our borders.
There’s no democratic government to protect, and the conflict itself is highly questionable on all fronts.
Did you know that there’s still no proof of Alky Aida having anything to do with the 9/11 thingy? There isn’t, not a single one, at least not officially. And if protecting human rights or females being oppressed is the reason, why the hell aren’t we invading and sending troops into Saudi Arabia? Iran? Indonesia? Most of Africa? And can we really argue that we are much better? There’s no problem finding direct violation against basic human rights in Sweden, the US, UK or any other country.
Should we send troops everywhere? Hell, why not? A World War would be fun, don’t you think?
But when you really think about it, what has traditional conservatism to support in this Afghani conflict? Are we protecting democracy? No. Are we protecting traditions, Swedish history or Christian values? No. Do we really have lots of money to throw away at something like this? No. Do we stand to gain anything from this conflict? No. So what then?
If we really had a reason to fight, if we really were at war and not being the aggressive part, I would probably be one of the first to wave the Swedish flag and sign up to protect my country. However, this isn’t the case here. These soldiers died far away in a conflict we have no reason to be involved in.
I also ponder on why so many support the notion of Swedish troops going to Afghanistan. Are we jealous of Americans having all the fun? Have so many idiots really bought the crap media is selling us? And why have so many, from liberals to conservatives, from social democrats to middle-of-the-road pundits in unison got behind this madness?
It seems that the only ones against are socialists (they want to start their own wars) and libertarians. Well, I know there are some others, but I’m talking about groups of people with a certain political persuasion.
And should a true conservative with the tingling fiscally sound bone really be for this conflict? Is it so nice with flag-waving people? Oh, and that national anthem playing with soldiers defending some elusive ‘honor’ while we hear the sound of huge combat-boots stamping away. Does that get that national feeling going? Or? Is this why conservatives love having Swedish soldiers far away in a conflict we have nothing to do with?
Maybe they just feel that war is fantastic? You get phallus shaped rockets and phallus shaped amo fired from phallus shaped rocket-launchers and phallus shaped airplanes. And those phallus thingies go flying through the air making big holes in the sand. When I was in the army I did see them blowing up 5 tons of old ammunition, that mushroom cloud was a sight for sour eyes I can tell you. So I sort of get it, playing with toys that go “boom” is fun shit, too bad some Muslims need to die in the process. Oh well, that can be fun that too. I mean, body parts flying, kids getting their legs cut off, women getting raped, families dying from starvation, millions of refugees. Yapp, great fun...
What are we doing in Afghanistan again?
And the Swedish Defense Mentalist is saying we should get behind the troops. Wtf!? Another American quote stolen to make us proud over dead Swedes? Of course we are behind them and their families, all of us, but that doesn’t mean that we cannot say that the Defense Mentalist is liable, an idiot and should be blamed for the dead.
We shouldn’t be there!
But that only last a second or so - my conservative vein beats shortly.
The problems with conservative thinking are; too much nationalism, too much pride over being whatever you are. And that conservative vein also beat to the wing-flaps of history, tradition and Christian values. Unintentionally this leads to the dark side of collectivism and builds that ‘we against them’ feeling.
So after that second or two I realize why the soldiers really died and I get angry.
Angry because we have no reason being there, none whatsoever.
No one has attacked Sweden. No terrorists have bombed our citizens. No Afghanis have attacked our borders.
There’s no democratic government to protect, and the conflict itself is highly questionable on all fronts.
Did you know that there’s still no proof of Alky Aida having anything to do with the 9/11 thingy? There isn’t, not a single one, at least not officially. And if protecting human rights or females being oppressed is the reason, why the hell aren’t we invading and sending troops into Saudi Arabia? Iran? Indonesia? Most of Africa? And can we really argue that we are much better? There’s no problem finding direct violation against basic human rights in Sweden, the US, UK or any other country.
Should we send troops everywhere? Hell, why not? A World War would be fun, don’t you think?
But when you really think about it, what has traditional conservatism to support in this Afghani conflict? Are we protecting democracy? No. Are we protecting traditions, Swedish history or Christian values? No. Do we really have lots of money to throw away at something like this? No. Do we stand to gain anything from this conflict? No. So what then?
If we really had a reason to fight, if we really were at war and not being the aggressive part, I would probably be one of the first to wave the Swedish flag and sign up to protect my country. However, this isn’t the case here. These soldiers died far away in a conflict we have no reason to be involved in.
I also ponder on why so many support the notion of Swedish troops going to Afghanistan. Are we jealous of Americans having all the fun? Have so many idiots really bought the crap media is selling us? And why have so many, from liberals to conservatives, from social democrats to middle-of-the-road pundits in unison got behind this madness?
It seems that the only ones against are socialists (they want to start their own wars) and libertarians. Well, I know there are some others, but I’m talking about groups of people with a certain political persuasion.
And should a true conservative with the tingling fiscally sound bone really be for this conflict? Is it so nice with flag-waving people? Oh, and that national anthem playing with soldiers defending some elusive ‘honor’ while we hear the sound of huge combat-boots stamping away. Does that get that national feeling going? Or? Is this why conservatives love having Swedish soldiers far away in a conflict we have nothing to do with?
Maybe they just feel that war is fantastic? You get phallus shaped rockets and phallus shaped amo fired from phallus shaped rocket-launchers and phallus shaped airplanes. And those phallus thingies go flying through the air making big holes in the sand. When I was in the army I did see them blowing up 5 tons of old ammunition, that mushroom cloud was a sight for sour eyes I can tell you. So I sort of get it, playing with toys that go “boom” is fun shit, too bad some Muslims need to die in the process. Oh well, that can be fun that too. I mean, body parts flying, kids getting their legs cut off, women getting raped, families dying from starvation, millions of refugees. Yapp, great fun...
What are we doing in Afghanistan again?
And the Swedish Defense Mentalist is saying we should get behind the troops. Wtf!? Another American quote stolen to make us proud over dead Swedes? Of course we are behind them and their families, all of us, but that doesn’t mean that we cannot say that the Defense Mentalist is liable, an idiot and should be blamed for the dead.
We shouldn’t be there!
Get the hell out of there!
So some of my fellow countrymen have died in battle...
Two Swedish military officers and a local interpreter were killed when their unit came under fire west of Mazar-e Sharif in Afghanistan.
The two Swedish officers, a captain and a lieutenant, and the interpreter were killed in an ambush 40-50 kilometers west of the Swedish army base, in an area where Swedish and Finnish peace-keepers confiscated 70 kilograms of narcotics and a quantity of explosives earlier in the week.
This happens at the same time as Afghan border police killed seven civilians after opening fire on a group of villagers they mistook for fighters, and at the same time as US drones continue to murder civilians in Pakistan.
There are so many wrongs that have been done, are being done and will be done in the near future in the Afghanistan conflict. We could talk about oil, pipe-lines, opium trade blossoming, civilians dying, children suffering and so on.
But you know, even if a vast majority has a negative opinion, that’s still better than having people realizing that the biggest robbery in human history have been committed. Western governments have handed over trillions upon trillions to bankers and other within the enemy class - this need to be hidden away of course.
Also, since the only positive number in the American economy at the moment is military spending, it means that to cut that would decrease GDP…
Money, of course, is also a reason. The protection of valuable oil findings and pipe-lines as well as the drug trade. Arms-dealers, certain banks and some shadowy groups have earned a lot of money from this conflict, and they have no incentive to stop the killing.
The strategy can involve several things, but certainly not to win, as mentioned the US has no intention of winning. Instead one can see the encircling of Iran as a reason for staying, or any of the other above mentioned. So I would argue that the strategy is; to not have a strategy! This isn’t really a war, it’s a conflict at best, a skirmish. If this really was a war and the US really wanted to win, they would destroy any opposition in a matter of weeks.
There is only one way to fight a war. You commit your nation's resources - material and the most precious of all, human - to the complete obliteration of your enemy. You mass those resources against each objective in turn, without reservation, without holding back, without care for collateral damage or world opinion. You do so until your adversary sues for peace, not because it is the political thing to do, not for expedience, but for one and only one reason: they're tired of dying. There is no "armistice" or "cease fire" in a war. There is only victory or defeat. There is only death or life. Collateral damage, including the loss of innocent life, is a known price that will be paid, although the toll is not of concern in that regard - only the certainty that it will occur.
So if America really committed millions of troops, flew in all their support or started to throw tactical nukes around, they would eliminate every single cave, all Taliban’, all terrorists and Bin Laden would be found in bits and pieces, and they would do so in a very short amount of time. Of course tens of thousands of innocent would die and the world opinion would hate America, but they would win the war. As it stands now, 7 years and counting as many as a million plus people may have died, even more so if counting Iraq. The economic cost is staggering and there’s no end in sight.
The US and its buddies need to decide, either end it, or leave. But they don’t want to you see. For the reasons already mentioned and other motives, instead they take what can only be described as the ‘mockery approach’. They bomb some mountains, but not others, effectively only pissing people off, creating more enemies than they had to start with. And the Afghan people are used to fighting an overwhelming enemy, so there’s really no end here.
There are also the soon to be terrorist attacks that will hit one or several targets, such events will probably coincide with worsened public polls for western governments or the next economic crash, so this is yet another reason for this little conflict not to end.
And even if the US have some form of “valid” reason for being there; what the hell are the rest of the countries are doing there? Wasting tax money and showing how much they care about one village while the town next to it is destroyed maybe? Protecting a corrupt anti-women inhuman regime against another corrupt anti-women inhuman regime?
Fuck!
If it is so bloody important to protect female rights and support totalitarian regimes, we have enough of those problems at home. Bring the troops home so they can murder our own citizens instead, would at least be more cost-effective…
Rest in peace and let's hope you dead guys are the last ones coming home in coffins.
Two Swedish military officers and a local interpreter were killed when their unit came under fire west of Mazar-e Sharif in Afghanistan.
The two Swedish officers, a captain and a lieutenant, and the interpreter were killed in an ambush 40-50 kilometers west of the Swedish army base, in an area where Swedish and Finnish peace-keepers confiscated 70 kilograms of narcotics and a quantity of explosives earlier in the week.
This happens at the same time as Afghan border police killed seven civilians after opening fire on a group of villagers they mistook for fighters, and at the same time as US drones continue to murder civilians in Pakistan.
There are so many wrongs that have been done, are being done and will be done in the near future in the Afghanistan conflict. We could talk about oil, pipe-lines, opium trade blossoming, civilians dying, children suffering and so on.
But you know, even if a vast majority has a negative opinion, that’s still better than having people realizing that the biggest robbery in human history have been committed. Western governments have handed over trillions upon trillions to bankers and other within the enemy class - this need to be hidden away of course.
Also, since the only positive number in the American economy at the moment is military spending, it means that to cut that would decrease GDP…
Money, of course, is also a reason. The protection of valuable oil findings and pipe-lines as well as the drug trade. Arms-dealers, certain banks and some shadowy groups have earned a lot of money from this conflict, and they have no incentive to stop the killing.
The strategy can involve several things, but certainly not to win, as mentioned the US has no intention of winning. Instead one can see the encircling of Iran as a reason for staying, or any of the other above mentioned. So I would argue that the strategy is; to not have a strategy! This isn’t really a war, it’s a conflict at best, a skirmish. If this really was a war and the US really wanted to win, they would destroy any opposition in a matter of weeks.
There is only one way to fight a war. You commit your nation's resources - material and the most precious of all, human - to the complete obliteration of your enemy. You mass those resources against each objective in turn, without reservation, without holding back, without care for collateral damage or world opinion. You do so until your adversary sues for peace, not because it is the political thing to do, not for expedience, but for one and only one reason: they're tired of dying. There is no "armistice" or "cease fire" in a war. There is only victory or defeat. There is only death or life. Collateral damage, including the loss of innocent life, is a known price that will be paid, although the toll is not of concern in that regard - only the certainty that it will occur.
So if America really committed millions of troops, flew in all their support or started to throw tactical nukes around, they would eliminate every single cave, all Taliban’, all terrorists and Bin Laden would be found in bits and pieces, and they would do so in a very short amount of time. Of course tens of thousands of innocent would die and the world opinion would hate America, but they would win the war. As it stands now, 7 years and counting as many as a million plus people may have died, even more so if counting Iraq. The economic cost is staggering and there’s no end in sight.
The US and its buddies need to decide, either end it, or leave. But they don’t want to you see. For the reasons already mentioned and other motives, instead they take what can only be described as the ‘mockery approach’. They bomb some mountains, but not others, effectively only pissing people off, creating more enemies than they had to start with. And the Afghan people are used to fighting an overwhelming enemy, so there’s really no end here.
There are also the soon to be terrorist attacks that will hit one or several targets, such events will probably coincide with worsened public polls for western governments or the next economic crash, so this is yet another reason for this little conflict not to end.
And even if the US have some form of “valid” reason for being there; what the hell are the rest of the countries are doing there? Wasting tax money and showing how much they care about one village while the town next to it is destroyed maybe? Protecting a corrupt anti-women inhuman regime against another corrupt anti-women inhuman regime?
Fuck!
If it is so bloody important to protect female rights and support totalitarian regimes, we have enough of those problems at home. Bring the troops home so they can murder our own citizens instead, would at least be more cost-effective…
Rest in peace and let's hope you dead guys are the last ones coming home in coffins.
Saturday, February 6, 2010
I don’t like Sarah Palin
I don’t like Sarah Palin. Too religious, too flaky in a stupid way and in she is a part of the elitist establishment that the Tea Party is against, or should be against.
So I don’t get it why she spoke at the Tea Party convent, she shouldn’t have been there; she’s rather a part of the problem than any kind of solution of it.
Watch her speach here:
This is one of the main problems facing this grassroots movement looking to shake up Washington; they are to a certain extent missing the point. They are still one of the best things that ever happened to America and you gotto salute 2 million strong demonstrators even though mainstream media hardly even mentioned the biggest protest rally that ever hit the streets of the capital. But they do have a problem.
The problem is that many of them still think this can be resolved through electing the right kind of ‘conservatives’ or scream high enough and things will change. This is totally wrong. No Sarah, no Ronald or Paul can save America as it looks now; the country needs a second revolution, a real one, not a handing-out-pamphlets-and-rally-revolution, but a real one. Not necessarily an armed revolution, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it comes to that.
1913 with the Federal Reserve act really started the whole mess, but during the latest decades things have escalated and today I would regard my birth nation, Sweden, as a more free minded and less fascist country, and that says something.
America isn’t the home of the free and brave, haven’t been for many years. America is the home of the serfs, the controlled, the overtaxed, home of the anti-Muslim war machine and home of the religious nut-jobs. The US of A is the place where the biggest bank robbery in history has just taken place and what do people do? They vote for the same puppet masters that orchestrated the whole thing.
The two party system is a scam and the president and congress all work for and sleep with big business and the banking cartel. What once was the bread-basket and most producing country in the world is now reduced to fatty consumerism and lazy borrowing to pay for it.
I am generalizing of course, such a diverse country with 300+ million people cannot be reduced to a couple of sentences, but I’m angry. America was the hope, the place of refuge, a shining beacon of light in a dark socialist world. Now special interests, socially aware conservatives (fascists) and Democrats (Marxists) have turned this country into a GramscoFabiaNazi nightmare, an Orwellian society closing in on totalitarianism more and more each day.
This cannot be resolved by exchanging democrats for republicans or vice versa. They are all in cahoots. And this is why Sarah Palin isn’t a part of the solution; she’s a part of the problem. The only really good thing about the woman is that she wants to kill some Polar Bears, gotto love that.
A coincident?
So I don’t get it why she spoke at the Tea Party convent, she shouldn’t have been there; she’s rather a part of the problem than any kind of solution of it.
Watch her speach here:
This is one of the main problems facing this grassroots movement looking to shake up Washington; they are to a certain extent missing the point. They are still one of the best things that ever happened to America and you gotto salute 2 million strong demonstrators even though mainstream media hardly even mentioned the biggest protest rally that ever hit the streets of the capital. But they do have a problem.
The problem is that many of them still think this can be resolved through electing the right kind of ‘conservatives’ or scream high enough and things will change. This is totally wrong. No Sarah, no Ronald or Paul can save America as it looks now; the country needs a second revolution, a real one, not a handing-out-pamphlets-and-rally-revolution, but a real one. Not necessarily an armed revolution, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it comes to that.
1913 with the Federal Reserve act really started the whole mess, but during the latest decades things have escalated and today I would regard my birth nation, Sweden, as a more free minded and less fascist country, and that says something.
America isn’t the home of the free and brave, haven’t been for many years. America is the home of the serfs, the controlled, the overtaxed, home of the anti-Muslim war machine and home of the religious nut-jobs. The US of A is the place where the biggest bank robbery in history has just taken place and what do people do? They vote for the same puppet masters that orchestrated the whole thing.
The two party system is a scam and the president and congress all work for and sleep with big business and the banking cartel. What once was the bread-basket and most producing country in the world is now reduced to fatty consumerism and lazy borrowing to pay for it.
I am generalizing of course, such a diverse country with 300+ million people cannot be reduced to a couple of sentences, but I’m angry. America was the hope, the place of refuge, a shining beacon of light in a dark socialist world. Now special interests, socially aware conservatives (fascists) and Democrats (Marxists) have turned this country into a GramscoFabiaNazi nightmare, an Orwellian society closing in on totalitarianism more and more each day.
This cannot be resolved by exchanging democrats for republicans or vice versa. They are all in cahoots. And this is why Sarah Palin isn’t a part of the solution; she’s a part of the problem. The only really good thing about the woman is that she wants to kill some Polar Bears, gotto love that.
A coincident?
Why a ‘terrorist’ attack is imminent
I want you to think about something.
There are some 300 000 Americans of Pakistani origins living in the US alone. And imagine how many millions of Iraqis, Pakistanis, Afghanis etc that are living all over the western world. Add in refugees and immigrants and all those who appall the wars going on in Muslim countries, throw in some economic disasters (more lurking behind the corner) and sprinkle over resentments, unemployment and how the elitist enemy class keep screwing average citizens on a daily basis.
And when you have done this in your mind, watch this video and tell me what the future has installed for us…
… and can you really, really blame them for planning soon to be executed terrorist actions?
9/11 was horrible, and maybe the US had the right to strike back, but if so; at what cost? How many millions of Muslims is okay to kill before that attack is revenged? How many trillions of dollars is enough? How many more countries invaded? How many more civil liberties should we give up?
The terrorists are winning the war, and they really don’t haft to do a damn thing - the US war machine is doing it for them. And many other countries are guilty for aiding and abiding.
There are some 300 000 Americans of Pakistani origins living in the US alone. And imagine how many millions of Iraqis, Pakistanis, Afghanis etc that are living all over the western world. Add in refugees and immigrants and all those who appall the wars going on in Muslim countries, throw in some economic disasters (more lurking behind the corner) and sprinkle over resentments, unemployment and how the elitist enemy class keep screwing average citizens on a daily basis.
And when you have done this in your mind, watch this video and tell me what the future has installed for us…
… and can you really, really blame them for planning soon to be executed terrorist actions?
9/11 was horrible, and maybe the US had the right to strike back, but if so; at what cost? How many millions of Muslims is okay to kill before that attack is revenged? How many trillions of dollars is enough? How many more countries invaded? How many more civil liberties should we give up?
The terrorists are winning the war, and they really don’t haft to do a damn thing - the US war machine is doing it for them. And many other countries are guilty for aiding and abiding.
The great messiah’s socialist promises
The US pick-pocket in Chief Barack H Obama has now asked Congress to temporarily expand two lending programs for the owners of small businesses. And who does the great potentate steal this money from? That’s right, from the same businesses he’s out to help.
The scam continues and the sandcastle is about to be swept away by the depressional tsunami wave of utter financial disaster lurking over the horizon.
The scam continues and the sandcastle is about to be swept away by the depressional tsunami wave of utter financial disaster lurking over the horizon.
The gay within awaken
Tonight is one of many nights of Swedish try-outs to the Eurovision Song Contest. In several semi-finals a bunch of songs will be elected to go through to the Swedish final whereas a winner will be proclaimed and then sent to the European final.
I love this crap!
I truly do. And it not just the glamour, glitter and bad singing that does it, it is also one of those times you can go all out and be really, really gay.
I’m generally a pretty manly guy. Been in plenty of bar-fights, I love vodka, have lots of chest-hair and have slept more women than I can count. I love the outdoors; guns and any decent engine roaring make me hard. But as any self-respecting man I can also appreciate a finger up my rectum as well as Eurovision.
Well, you don’t haft to be gay or know a lot of gay folks to love Eurovision, but it helps.
Besides, many of the best songs ever heard have been a part of this magnificent spectacle.
This is one of those:
At the Swedish tryouts to the Eurovision song contest 1995 this song happened to end up at 2nd place. My disillusion with the human race might actually have been confirmed and strengthen that night, why didn’t it win!?
Cecilia is singing about the most beautiful moment; with the one you love beside you, waking up a morning with the fog going away and a new day arriving. Listen and enjoy to pictures from Sweden. I will now start to prepare for this year’s tryouts by doing what I do best; drinking a lot of vodka.
The song is called: “Det vackraste” which means = the most beautiful
Lyrics translated from Swedish
The most beautiful thing I know
Is to watch you when you're sleeping
It's quiet and peaceful here
And I forget both space and time
You're lying here beside me
And can I feel you, breathing
To be loved by you
Is the most beautiful thing for me
How fairytale-like it is
To see the morning mist rise
When darkness slowly flees
And see the break of day
A cool morning breeze
Slowly sweeps through the room
I cuddle close to you
Happy that you exist
Moments of silence
A moment of quiet once in a while
Moments of happiness
To simply have each other
It is a great wealth
To love and be loved
The gentleness of our love
Is the most beautiful thing I know
The most beautiful thing there is
Is to be close to someone
When the moon is shining brightly
Over forests and fields, so wonderful
You're lying here beside me
And can I feel you, breathing
To be loved by you
Is the most beautiful thing for me
Moments of silence
A moment of quiet once in a while
Moments of happiness
To simply have each other
It is a great wealth
To love and be loved
The gentleness of our love
Is the most beautiful thing I know
You're lying here beside me
And can I feel you, breathing
To be loved by you
Is the most beautiful thing for me
I love this crap!
I truly do. And it not just the glamour, glitter and bad singing that does it, it is also one of those times you can go all out and be really, really gay.
I’m generally a pretty manly guy. Been in plenty of bar-fights, I love vodka, have lots of chest-hair and have slept more women than I can count. I love the outdoors; guns and any decent engine roaring make me hard. But as any self-respecting man I can also appreciate a finger up my rectum as well as Eurovision.
Well, you don’t haft to be gay or know a lot of gay folks to love Eurovision, but it helps.
Besides, many of the best songs ever heard have been a part of this magnificent spectacle.
This is one of those:
At the Swedish tryouts to the Eurovision song contest 1995 this song happened to end up at 2nd place. My disillusion with the human race might actually have been confirmed and strengthen that night, why didn’t it win!?
Cecilia is singing about the most beautiful moment; with the one you love beside you, waking up a morning with the fog going away and a new day arriving. Listen and enjoy to pictures from Sweden. I will now start to prepare for this year’s tryouts by doing what I do best; drinking a lot of vodka.
The song is called: “Det vackraste” which means = the most beautiful
Lyrics translated from Swedish
The most beautiful thing I know
Is to watch you when you're sleeping
It's quiet and peaceful here
And I forget both space and time
You're lying here beside me
And can I feel you, breathing
To be loved by you
Is the most beautiful thing for me
How fairytale-like it is
To see the morning mist rise
When darkness slowly flees
And see the break of day
A cool morning breeze
Slowly sweeps through the room
I cuddle close to you
Happy that you exist
Moments of silence
A moment of quiet once in a while
Moments of happiness
To simply have each other
It is a great wealth
To love and be loved
The gentleness of our love
Is the most beautiful thing I know
The most beautiful thing there is
Is to be close to someone
When the moon is shining brightly
Over forests and fields, so wonderful
You're lying here beside me
And can I feel you, breathing
To be loved by you
Is the most beautiful thing for me
Moments of silence
A moment of quiet once in a while
Moments of happiness
To simply have each other
It is a great wealth
To love and be loved
The gentleness of our love
Is the most beautiful thing I know
You're lying here beside me
And can I feel you, breathing
To be loved by you
Is the most beautiful thing for me
The lying reaches new heights
Today we’re told that Sweden is lagging behind, that our GDP isn’t growing as much as many other countries and that our income is faulting because of fewer exports.
All of this is built upon the lie that is GDP.
You see when export goes down in relation to import GDP goes down and vice versa when export goes up in relation to import GDP goes up. This is one of many scams that come with GDP-calculation.
I’ve revealed this bluff here on this blog before on many occasions so if you wish you can go back and read about it, but know this: GDP measures wealth and income about as accurate as blind man can pick out his relatives in a huge gathering four miles away.
So every time any journalist, politician or pundit picks up the GDP-rabbit and wave it around like a magic trick you should be very wary about what that con-artist is saying.
FACT! We can get wealthier even though GDP goes down.
FACT! We can get poorer (and this is very often the case) even though GDP goes up.
The truth is that Sweden, although in bad shape, stands on much more solid ground than most other western nations. We are not deeply in-debt (even though the central bank do it’s very best to make us slaves to more debt), our unemployment figures are not hidden away to the same degree as in other countries, our stock exchange isn’t 50% overvalued like the American one, and we still have a lot of industry and real wealth-creating companies within our borders.
There are other not-so-bad things about my birth nation, but the point is that things are not as bad in comparison as GDP numbers might show. If it wasn’t for our deep dependence on foreign trade we would sail pretty easy through the looming depression that is about to hit the world.
So why do media try to sell us another picture?
Well, there are two reasons for this.
Firstly, and probably most important, is that media have deep, very deep connections and ties to socialism. The entire journalistic landscape is pretty much an echo of the Soviet Union or other totalitarian leftie regimes. I know it is bad in many countries, but journalists in Sweden will be on the top on any kind of list. They are the laziest, most overpaid, useless bunch of (socialist)regime-devoted thugs you can imagine. Even the so called “right-wing” papers are really only one step away from Lenin’s wet dream. These spokespersons of statism will do anything to get back the socialist/communist/tree-hugging government they love so much hence anything bad cabled out will be another nail for the current administration.
Secondly there are so many Keynesians out there and they hate that Sweden haven’t committed as much to the maniac spending-spree and outrageous money-printing all others have. They need to prove how bad it is to not borrow, not to print, and not to spend trillions on useless things.
Here comes another mad consequence of GDP calculation into play. Whenever government spends, GDP goes up. And the funny thing is; it doesn’t matter on what they spend the money on! They can have people digging dirt, shoveling growl from left to right, produce 53 trillion left shoes, it does not matter - it all ends up as a positive comes to GDP.
And this is what they are trying to sell now. If Government don’t get its act together and start wasting massive amount of money, Sweden will fall behind… cry… cry…
Oh, and don’t think for a second I like the current Swedish government, I don’t, they are idiots. But there’s a degree difference within the asylum, and if you listen to all of this crying you will soon find that you’ve given them the key to the door and the really insane will roam free.
Don’t listen to a word of what the elitists are saying, it’s all lies and insane ramblings.
All of this is built upon the lie that is GDP.
You see when export goes down in relation to import GDP goes down and vice versa when export goes up in relation to import GDP goes up. This is one of many scams that come with GDP-calculation.
I’ve revealed this bluff here on this blog before on many occasions so if you wish you can go back and read about it, but know this: GDP measures wealth and income about as accurate as blind man can pick out his relatives in a huge gathering four miles away.
So every time any journalist, politician or pundit picks up the GDP-rabbit and wave it around like a magic trick you should be very wary about what that con-artist is saying.
FACT! We can get wealthier even though GDP goes down.
FACT! We can get poorer (and this is very often the case) even though GDP goes up.
The truth is that Sweden, although in bad shape, stands on much more solid ground than most other western nations. We are not deeply in-debt (even though the central bank do it’s very best to make us slaves to more debt), our unemployment figures are not hidden away to the same degree as in other countries, our stock exchange isn’t 50% overvalued like the American one, and we still have a lot of industry and real wealth-creating companies within our borders.
There are other not-so-bad things about my birth nation, but the point is that things are not as bad in comparison as GDP numbers might show. If it wasn’t for our deep dependence on foreign trade we would sail pretty easy through the looming depression that is about to hit the world.
So why do media try to sell us another picture?
Well, there are two reasons for this.
Firstly, and probably most important, is that media have deep, very deep connections and ties to socialism. The entire journalistic landscape is pretty much an echo of the Soviet Union or other totalitarian leftie regimes. I know it is bad in many countries, but journalists in Sweden will be on the top on any kind of list. They are the laziest, most overpaid, useless bunch of (socialist)regime-devoted thugs you can imagine. Even the so called “right-wing” papers are really only one step away from Lenin’s wet dream. These spokespersons of statism will do anything to get back the socialist/communist/tree-hugging government they love so much hence anything bad cabled out will be another nail for the current administration.
Secondly there are so many Keynesians out there and they hate that Sweden haven’t committed as much to the maniac spending-spree and outrageous money-printing all others have. They need to prove how bad it is to not borrow, not to print, and not to spend trillions on useless things.
Here comes another mad consequence of GDP calculation into play. Whenever government spends, GDP goes up. And the funny thing is; it doesn’t matter on what they spend the money on! They can have people digging dirt, shoveling growl from left to right, produce 53 trillion left shoes, it does not matter - it all ends up as a positive comes to GDP.
And this is what they are trying to sell now. If Government don’t get its act together and start wasting massive amount of money, Sweden will fall behind… cry… cry…
Oh, and don’t think for a second I like the current Swedish government, I don’t, they are idiots. But there’s a degree difference within the asylum, and if you listen to all of this crying you will soon find that you’ve given them the key to the door and the really insane will roam free.
Don’t listen to a word of what the elitists are saying, it’s all lies and insane ramblings.
Decomposing corpses
Apparently Sweden is the country that saves the dead the longest before putting them down with friendly nibbling worms and insects. One of many reasons for this delay is that Medical personnel wait too long with sending in the necessary required document to the tax agency. You see in Sweden the most important thing is to let the government know you’re really dead so there are no discrepancies in regards to taxation.
So for this and a couple of other reasons laying the cadaver to rest takes up to several weeks longer in Sweden than in most other countries.
Not that I myself really care, a dead carcass isn’t really going anywhere and people who let their remains lay about pretty much intact are stupid anyways. Incineration is the only way to go.
I would love to have a proper Viking burial myself, but that is of course illegal - some other government bureau has decided this. And since yet another government entity is in charge of where we can be buried, how, and during what religious superstitious rite, and yet another government entity makes you pay tax for funeral arrangement… well… let’s just say that when that day comes, I’ll be glad to be gone…
So for this and a couple of other reasons laying the cadaver to rest takes up to several weeks longer in Sweden than in most other countries.
Not that I myself really care, a dead carcass isn’t really going anywhere and people who let their remains lay about pretty much intact are stupid anyways. Incineration is the only way to go.
I would love to have a proper Viking burial myself, but that is of course illegal - some other government bureau has decided this. And since yet another government entity is in charge of where we can be buried, how, and during what religious superstitious rite, and yet another government entity makes you pay tax for funeral arrangement… well… let’s just say that when that day comes, I’ll be glad to be gone…
It was just a matter of time
Lund University in southern Sweden is apparently trying to impose restriction for blogging about campus life. Religion, politics and too negative stuff about other students and teachers are disallowed. Since the students are official spokespersons for the university the heads of the academia feel it is imperative to quench any ‘offensive’ talk.
This is the righteous and sneaky approach and these people probably don’t even realize what this means. I would also guess there are a lot of you out there that really don’t mind, shouldn’t they be restricted in this manor when writing for and about the university they are at?
Well, what if the university discriminates against Muslims or Jews, shouldn’t that be acknowledged? What if the campus is badly run? Isn’t that something potential student should know about? What about the lack of housing? It can take many months to get a decent accommodation; any would-be attendee should have that information, no? And this is a publically paid for institution, why should students be banned from writing whatever?
What should be worrisome are the next steps and the spilling-over effect. If students aren’t allowed to write about politics and religion (that incorporate pretty much everything) on the university server, won’t this effect how they act in private? If you study at a certain institution that has outlawed certain opinions and topics it will affect how you write your own blog. It’s only natural. Also, as a former student union president, I can tell you that certain teachers will punish any “wrong views” and many will know this and adjust accordingly.
And whatever happened to free speech? Isn’t universities supposed to encourage free thinking and debate?
But the real problem is how this fits in with all the rest.
I’ve many times written about how media and pundits continuously report about and scare us with ‘news’ that crimes are committed and planned everywhere in cyberspace, how terrorists send email to each other, how horrible hackers steal grandmas savings, and how any teenage daughter are helplessly picked up by predators each time she sits down in front of a computer.
Not a single day goes by without papers telling us about the latest online-con whereas tricksters scam unsuspected people to give up their bank-statements and home address. News stations cable out daily how piracy is and should be combated. And ‘Grooming’… it all comes back to the Childreeeeen, doesn’t it? If we were to believe the righteous elitists then every man logging on is a drooling kiddy-porn fanatic.
So I regard this little university hindrance as yet another step on this totalitarian road.
Of course there will be some loud voices about this, maybe the university even will take a step back as a consequence, but you see it does not matter. The issue has been raised, the seed has been planted. Soon another institution will follow, then another. After that there will be more restrictions, probably on a national level. And so it goes on in a never ending expanding fascist wet dream.
This is how the system works. Baby-steps that together form a cohesive whole.
This is the righteous and sneaky approach and these people probably don’t even realize what this means. I would also guess there are a lot of you out there that really don’t mind, shouldn’t they be restricted in this manor when writing for and about the university they are at?
Well, what if the university discriminates against Muslims or Jews, shouldn’t that be acknowledged? What if the campus is badly run? Isn’t that something potential student should know about? What about the lack of housing? It can take many months to get a decent accommodation; any would-be attendee should have that information, no? And this is a publically paid for institution, why should students be banned from writing whatever?
What should be worrisome are the next steps and the spilling-over effect. If students aren’t allowed to write about politics and religion (that incorporate pretty much everything) on the university server, won’t this effect how they act in private? If you study at a certain institution that has outlawed certain opinions and topics it will affect how you write your own blog. It’s only natural. Also, as a former student union president, I can tell you that certain teachers will punish any “wrong views” and many will know this and adjust accordingly.
And whatever happened to free speech? Isn’t universities supposed to encourage free thinking and debate?
But the real problem is how this fits in with all the rest.
I’ve many times written about how media and pundits continuously report about and scare us with ‘news’ that crimes are committed and planned everywhere in cyberspace, how terrorists send email to each other, how horrible hackers steal grandmas savings, and how any teenage daughter are helplessly picked up by predators each time she sits down in front of a computer.
Not a single day goes by without papers telling us about the latest online-con whereas tricksters scam unsuspected people to give up their bank-statements and home address. News stations cable out daily how piracy is and should be combated. And ‘Grooming’… it all comes back to the Childreeeeen, doesn’t it? If we were to believe the righteous elitists then every man logging on is a drooling kiddy-porn fanatic.
So I regard this little university hindrance as yet another step on this totalitarian road.
Of course there will be some loud voices about this, maybe the university even will take a step back as a consequence, but you see it does not matter. The issue has been raised, the seed has been planted. Soon another institution will follow, then another. After that there will be more restrictions, probably on a national level. And so it goes on in a never ending expanding fascist wet dream.
This is how the system works. Baby-steps that together form a cohesive whole.
Friday, February 5, 2010
I understand Russia
In what the Russian president Medvedev calls "The New Russian Defence Doctrine", a program of sweeping reforms is set to be completed by 2020. While a massive modernization of Russia's nuclear strike capability is given headline treatment, the really significant changes affect other aspects of the military structure.
The new doctrine is prompted, at least in part, by three fears; none of which involves a hypothetical war with Nato. No one in Moscow believes such a war is even remotely probable (even though several Swedish papers are writing about it…).
Under the new doctrine, Russia's armed forces, now numbering almost two million, will be cut by almost half. Instead, there will be a massive increase in modern equipment.
As a Swede and consequently a part of the country that historically speaking been warring with Russia more than anyone else, you might assume I would regard this is a threat or ’changed’ form of threat, but then you would be wrong.
And yes, for those out there that don’t know it, Sweden and Russia are old adversaries and had fought many wars long before the US even was a country. Won some, lost some, over time pretty much a tie.
Anyway, I can see many advantages with this for Russia. They need to modernize their defenses, and who would be stupid enough to attack a nuclear country anyway? And both conscription and scorched earth tactics have to a large extent become obsolete.
So this is good for Russia, but I would also argue it is a good thing overall. Let me explain.
NATO have also played out its part, a reasonable thing would be to scrap that thing as well, but as long as American president insists in expanding the western war-machine I think it is good that someone is “in the way”, or dare to oppose it in some form. And you cannot blame Russia for feeling a bit threatened by the constant ever closing in NATO thingies. Especially since the only warring fraction in the world at the moment is mentioned defense pact.
For Sweden this should mean that we increase military spending slightly to be a step ahead of Russia and to keep ourselves far away from the American led coalition of warmongers. This will never happen of course, our politicians rather thrown our money at useless projects and give money to causes like the rehabilitation of murderers. And let’s not forget politician’s salaries and the hundreds of billions we give to banks. Much more important than to defend the country.
The only slightly worrisome part of this "The New Russian Defense Doctrine” is that Medvedev have spoken about pre-emptive war as an integral part of the new doctrine. From the US example we know what this could mean…
The new doctrine is prompted, at least in part, by three fears; none of which involves a hypothetical war with Nato. No one in Moscow believes such a war is even remotely probable (even though several Swedish papers are writing about it…).
Under the new doctrine, Russia's armed forces, now numbering almost two million, will be cut by almost half. Instead, there will be a massive increase in modern equipment.
As a Swede and consequently a part of the country that historically speaking been warring with Russia more than anyone else, you might assume I would regard this is a threat or ’changed’ form of threat, but then you would be wrong.
And yes, for those out there that don’t know it, Sweden and Russia are old adversaries and had fought many wars long before the US even was a country. Won some, lost some, over time pretty much a tie.
Anyway, I can see many advantages with this for Russia. They need to modernize their defenses, and who would be stupid enough to attack a nuclear country anyway? And both conscription and scorched earth tactics have to a large extent become obsolete.
So this is good for Russia, but I would also argue it is a good thing overall. Let me explain.
NATO have also played out its part, a reasonable thing would be to scrap that thing as well, but as long as American president insists in expanding the western war-machine I think it is good that someone is “in the way”, or dare to oppose it in some form. And you cannot blame Russia for feeling a bit threatened by the constant ever closing in NATO thingies. Especially since the only warring fraction in the world at the moment is mentioned defense pact.
For Sweden this should mean that we increase military spending slightly to be a step ahead of Russia and to keep ourselves far away from the American led coalition of warmongers. This will never happen of course, our politicians rather thrown our money at useless projects and give money to causes like the rehabilitation of murderers. And let’s not forget politician’s salaries and the hundreds of billions we give to banks. Much more important than to defend the country.
The only slightly worrisome part of this "The New Russian Defense Doctrine” is that Medvedev have spoken about pre-emptive war as an integral part of the new doctrine. From the US example we know what this could mean…
How the Enemy class explains fraud
Oh my, you need to watch this. Watch the whole thing; I rarely laugh this much, better than any comedy show. Fantastic!
Remember this is one of many tricksters. These guys should be very happy to be living in modern day UK… Not that it will soon, very soon, matter.
I see a beautiful sunset in the future. The sun going down while shimmering light over a lonely oak-tree with a rope dangling…
James Devine, a British Labour politician, who has been the Member of Parliament for Livingston since 2005.
Remember this is one of many tricksters. These guys should be very happy to be living in modern day UK… Not that it will soon, very soon, matter.
I see a beautiful sunset in the future. The sun going down while shimmering light over a lonely oak-tree with a rope dangling…
James Devine, a British Labour politician, who has been the Member of Parliament for Livingston since 2005.
Another example of idiotic journalism
Apparently 38 women were raped onboard ferries last year. The ferries mainly go between Sweden, Finland and Estonia.
A rape is a despicable act and only a single one is too many.
However, apparently media is screaming about this calling the boats for ‘floating party palaces’ filled with horrible acts that makes Sodom and Gomorra look peaceful and Presbyterian. Of course, as usual, they exaggerate things and scare people unnecessary.
Every boat is filled with somewhere around 1000-1500 people for each trip and since we have many boats going every day back and forth, we’re talking about 10 000 people each day. Many of these individuals drink and look to fornicate, that’s two of the main purposes of going.
So if thousands of people travel every day on boats, drinking themselves silly while looking for someone to fuck, then we can regard it as any medial sized town a Friday night. One rape every 10th Friday doesn’t seem too much, rather under ‘the norm’. Hence you could, with the statistics, argue that these party-boats are pretty safe. If parents are worried for their children, a ‘party-boat’ is safer than going downtown during the weekend.
This isn’t what journalists try to convince us of, but as usual a mainstream paper isn’t good for anything else then toilet visits or making Molotov-cocktail fuses with. The later may be a proper way of acknowledge this fact during a visit to any location of mentioned media…
A rape is a despicable act and only a single one is too many.
However, apparently media is screaming about this calling the boats for ‘floating party palaces’ filled with horrible acts that makes Sodom and Gomorra look peaceful and Presbyterian. Of course, as usual, they exaggerate things and scare people unnecessary.
Every boat is filled with somewhere around 1000-1500 people for each trip and since we have many boats going every day back and forth, we’re talking about 10 000 people each day. Many of these individuals drink and look to fornicate, that’s two of the main purposes of going.
So if thousands of people travel every day on boats, drinking themselves silly while looking for someone to fuck, then we can regard it as any medial sized town a Friday night. One rape every 10th Friday doesn’t seem too much, rather under ‘the norm’. Hence you could, with the statistics, argue that these party-boats are pretty safe. If parents are worried for their children, a ‘party-boat’ is safer than going downtown during the weekend.
This isn’t what journalists try to convince us of, but as usual a mainstream paper isn’t good for anything else then toilet visits or making Molotov-cocktail fuses with. The later may be a proper way of acknowledge this fact during a visit to any location of mentioned media…
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)