Sweden’s Prime Mentalist, Fredrik Reinfeldt, showed some real honesty today. After getting a question about how he and his cronies forces his party members and people of other parties to vote according to his wish he admitted that the party whip is a great tool and necessary in parliament proceedings.
He also spitted out that would be bad for Sweden if people (parliamentarians) are allowed to vote as they want.
So we have a Justice Mentalist that want suspects of crimes to be outed to all (and apparently this totalitarian view is shared by the Prime Mentalist), a government that are chasing down an entire youth generation and monitoring everything we do while locking up people for lots of victimless crimes, and now we find out that the big cheese himself loves to force people to vote his way.
Why are we even trying to pretend we have a democracy?
Why do we allow people to vote if everyone is supposed to make decisions according to the heads of the government? Wouldn’t it be better to elect ministers and then they can make all decisions? In essence parliament is an unnecessary entity.
To me this isn’t news, I’ve known about this way of govern since I was involved in politics myself. In fact this is one of the main reasons why I left politics because this isn’t only the case on a national level; it is true locally as well.
And they ask why so many young people leave politics – this is why.
And it isn’t only true for those in government now, it is a part of the system and it doesn’t matter what party we’re talking about.
Parliamentarians and politicians in general are voting cattle - very expensive cattle.
The whole system must change, but the politicians themselves will never do it. They live a too comfortable lifestyle with godlike benefits, so why would they want to change anything?
Saturday, March 20, 2010
A small lesson in history
For some decades the West haven’t been running the show. For a period of almost 500 years almost every great invention, every progress and new way of doing things emerged from Europe or the United States. This isn’t so anymore.
Actually this isn’t something new. Emperies have come and gone, countries blossoms get great and then they die. For about two thousand years Egypt was the ruler of most of civilization (well, and Babylon), then came China, the Persians, the Greeks, the Romans, Djingis khan, the Mayans and so forth. A hundred years ago the British Empire covered over 1/5 of the globe. They’ve all come and gone.
The same goes for the central points of progress and civilization. For most of our history the Middle East, the Mediterranean Sea, some parts of India and China have been the beacons of light. About 500 years ago Europe started to emerge as the center point and staid so until America grew strong.
And during the last 200 years the rejects, outcasts, and the poor fleeing from Europe mixed with refugees and a can-do attitude made the US into what probably is the greatest nation ever seen on this planet. Out-competing and out-producing everything and everyone.
Now we’re in a time of shift again and have been so for a while. China, although in much more trouble than most think, is running towards the future. India, Malaysia, South Korea and several other Asian states are not far behind.
Truth is they’ve already gone past Europe and since the US is defaulting more and more, they too are about to be left behind. Most of Europe and the US have been or are selling gold and out-sourcing to Asia. But even worse still is that our production of goods, the actual producing capacity i.e. our source of wealth is also moving or getting replaced by cheaper, better stuff from Asia.
Meanwhile Europeans and Americans are trying to maintain the welfare states we cannot afford and trying to conjure up money to pay for the Ponzi schemes that are our Pensions and Social security. And while doing so letting banksters and certain shadowy groups steal what little wealth we have left.
When things really crash, and it will and soon, no-one will be spared. Those Asian countries will also burn, Japan in particular. But the difference is that the producing capacity and the can-do attitude is now located in the East. They will be able to rebuild, grow and buy what’s left of the west. Thirty years into the future and we will be the back-water countries and developing nations. It wouldn’t even surprise me if Africa comes galloping past soon.
This is an approximate and very short description and it isn’t hard to say I forgot something, but the point I hope is clear.
Why did we let this happen?
The answer can be found in history as well as in ideology.
History tells us that there are three things that always precedes or is a big part of any decline. The fall of trade and roads, the growing gluttony on the expense of others and neighbors or new empires taking over.
Ideology tells us that if we let people be free, encourage commerce and let ideas be explored without too much hindrance then wealth grows and nations become great. Sure you can also conquer others and steal wealth but that will only last so long and without the basis of production this cannot be achieved either.
Or, to put it plainly, the more social and economic freedom the better for all, and the more statism the faster the decline.
Furthermore, I think Beatrice Ask must resign.
Actually this isn’t something new. Emperies have come and gone, countries blossoms get great and then they die. For about two thousand years Egypt was the ruler of most of civilization (well, and Babylon), then came China, the Persians, the Greeks, the Romans, Djingis khan, the Mayans and so forth. A hundred years ago the British Empire covered over 1/5 of the globe. They’ve all come and gone.
The same goes for the central points of progress and civilization. For most of our history the Middle East, the Mediterranean Sea, some parts of India and China have been the beacons of light. About 500 years ago Europe started to emerge as the center point and staid so until America grew strong.
And during the last 200 years the rejects, outcasts, and the poor fleeing from Europe mixed with refugees and a can-do attitude made the US into what probably is the greatest nation ever seen on this planet. Out-competing and out-producing everything and everyone.
Now we’re in a time of shift again and have been so for a while. China, although in much more trouble than most think, is running towards the future. India, Malaysia, South Korea and several other Asian states are not far behind.
Truth is they’ve already gone past Europe and since the US is defaulting more and more, they too are about to be left behind. Most of Europe and the US have been or are selling gold and out-sourcing to Asia. But even worse still is that our production of goods, the actual producing capacity i.e. our source of wealth is also moving or getting replaced by cheaper, better stuff from Asia.
Meanwhile Europeans and Americans are trying to maintain the welfare states we cannot afford and trying to conjure up money to pay for the Ponzi schemes that are our Pensions and Social security. And while doing so letting banksters and certain shadowy groups steal what little wealth we have left.
When things really crash, and it will and soon, no-one will be spared. Those Asian countries will also burn, Japan in particular. But the difference is that the producing capacity and the can-do attitude is now located in the East. They will be able to rebuild, grow and buy what’s left of the west. Thirty years into the future and we will be the back-water countries and developing nations. It wouldn’t even surprise me if Africa comes galloping past soon.
This is an approximate and very short description and it isn’t hard to say I forgot something, but the point I hope is clear.
Why did we let this happen?
The answer can be found in history as well as in ideology.
History tells us that there are three things that always precedes or is a big part of any decline. The fall of trade and roads, the growing gluttony on the expense of others and neighbors or new empires taking over.
Ideology tells us that if we let people be free, encourage commerce and let ideas be explored without too much hindrance then wealth grows and nations become great. Sure you can also conquer others and steal wealth but that will only last so long and without the basis of production this cannot be achieved either.
Or, to put it plainly, the more social and economic freedom the better for all, and the more statism the faster the decline.
Furthermore, I think Beatrice Ask must resign.
Phone sales UK-style
Normally I don’t pick up my phone when some unknown number is calling, but since I’m currently looking for a new job It is hard not to.
For some reason very persistent sales people have picked up on my new answer-all policy. Based in Dubai representing some government plot to hide debt or some such shit, they keep calling me. And these are not the average pushy types, no, these are much worse.
Let me give you a couple of examples from earlier today.
First call:
*Born free* is heard from my cell and I answer:
- Hi, this is XXX xxx speaking
- Yes, may I speak with Mr. Xxxxx please.
- That’s me
- I am calling from bladibladi blabla and wondering if you be interested in…
- No! I can stop you right there, I don’t want any…
- … a UK special for…
- I said no, I’m not interested. Stop wasting yours and my time.
-… and you can get a free…
- Did you hear me? Stop talking!
-Do you have a debt Mr XXxxx?
- uhm?
- We can offer you a good deal on any UK debt so if you…
- I don’t have any and I’m hanging up now
-… only would like to collect any of your…
*click*
Call 2 one hour later:
*Born free* is heard from my cell and I answer:
- Hi, this is XXX xxx speaking
- Yes, may I speak with Mr. Xxxxx please.
- That’s me
- I am calling from bladibladi blabla and wondering if you be interested in…
- No, sorry, I don’t want any, I’m not interested.
-… a UK special for…
- Another idiots just called about the same thing. Delete my number and get nuked!
-… and you can get a free…
*click*
This was the fifth call in two days. There should be some kind of UK anti-phone list or something I can put myself on. I know such things exists in most other countries. Any pointers? Anyone?
Furthermore, I think Beatrice Ask must resign.
Friday, March 19, 2010
Killed by a gun? No way!
In the gun-free zone of Sweden nobody is armed, self-defense is outlawed and everyone obey the ban…
I’ve been writing about shootings in my birth nation for a couple of days now. Every day is a shooting and pretty much every day someone dies from a shooting. Feeling safe do we?
Criminals are armed. If they don’t have knives they have guns or maybe chainsaws. You’ll be very lucky if getting raped, mugged or beaten down by someone(s) not armed. You see criminals don’t care if guns are outlawed, they are criminals. So if you get raped, thank your lucky star if the rapist isn’t armed.
Swedes love to thrash down on Americans and their gun-right laws. Apparently every gun-toting maniac in the world lives in the US and they are all either religiously crazy or pure lunatics wanting to go on a spree. This is what we’re told in European media in general and Swedish media in particular.
Sure the occasional shooting in Germany, Finland or any other place may reach the headlines, but nothing top how we gorge ourselves in self-righteousness when Americans do the killing. And every time we beat our chest in pride over having anti-gun laws. Because in Sweden we don’t allow guns so no-one ever get killed by guns. Right?
We can talk statistics or semantics, but whatever that might convey it is secondary. A person should have the absolute right to defend him/herself, and that is what matters.
By outlawing guns our rights have been violated three times over.
Firstly when government says we cannot own something, they take away our property right.
Secondly we cannot defend ourselves in a proper way. In effect the smaller and weaker you are, the more government is thrashing you. A 90lbs petite girl attacked by 2 men hasn’t a chance, but a gun equalizes this. If you are handicapped, alone, old or greatly outnumbered only a gun will put you above or equal to your attacker. Government has taking this away from us.
Thirdly, we have the right to protect ourselves from government itself. If a fascist or communist regime takes power or if a foreign power attacks, most of us are defenseless. They want it that way and this is also the real reason why guns are banned.
Actually it is not hard to come to the conclusion that an unarmed populace is automatically an enslaved populace.
There are shootings in Sweden every single day. Most of the time it is criminals shooting at other criminals, but not always. Families get destroyed, homes wrecked and fear spreads.
And fear is what they want. If we feel afraid we want government to protect us. The more afraid we are, the more laws, the more police and the more the war on crimes becomes everyone’s business.
They want us afraid and defenseless in addition to being outgunned and outnumbered. This is how they rule and this is why we don’t have gun-rights. This is why it is so important that we demand this right back.
Free people owns guns, slaves don’t.
Furthermore, I think Beatrice Ask must resign.
I’ve been writing about shootings in my birth nation for a couple of days now. Every day is a shooting and pretty much every day someone dies from a shooting. Feeling safe do we?
Criminals are armed. If they don’t have knives they have guns or maybe chainsaws. You’ll be very lucky if getting raped, mugged or beaten down by someone(s) not armed. You see criminals don’t care if guns are outlawed, they are criminals. So if you get raped, thank your lucky star if the rapist isn’t armed.
Swedes love to thrash down on Americans and their gun-right laws. Apparently every gun-toting maniac in the world lives in the US and they are all either religiously crazy or pure lunatics wanting to go on a spree. This is what we’re told in European media in general and Swedish media in particular.
Sure the occasional shooting in Germany, Finland or any other place may reach the headlines, but nothing top how we gorge ourselves in self-righteousness when Americans do the killing. And every time we beat our chest in pride over having anti-gun laws. Because in Sweden we don’t allow guns so no-one ever get killed by guns. Right?
We can talk statistics or semantics, but whatever that might convey it is secondary. A person should have the absolute right to defend him/herself, and that is what matters.
By outlawing guns our rights have been violated three times over.
Firstly when government says we cannot own something, they take away our property right.
Secondly we cannot defend ourselves in a proper way. In effect the smaller and weaker you are, the more government is thrashing you. A 90lbs petite girl attacked by 2 men hasn’t a chance, but a gun equalizes this. If you are handicapped, alone, old or greatly outnumbered only a gun will put you above or equal to your attacker. Government has taking this away from us.
Thirdly, we have the right to protect ourselves from government itself. If a fascist or communist regime takes power or if a foreign power attacks, most of us are defenseless. They want it that way and this is also the real reason why guns are banned.
Actually it is not hard to come to the conclusion that an unarmed populace is automatically an enslaved populace.
There are shootings in Sweden every single day. Most of the time it is criminals shooting at other criminals, but not always. Families get destroyed, homes wrecked and fear spreads.
And fear is what they want. If we feel afraid we want government to protect us. The more afraid we are, the more laws, the more police and the more the war on crimes becomes everyone’s business.
They want us afraid and defenseless in addition to being outgunned and outnumbered. This is how they rule and this is why we don’t have gun-rights. This is why it is so important that we demand this right back.
Free people owns guns, slaves don’t.
Furthermore, I think Beatrice Ask must resign.
Resign!
Sweden cannot have a Justice Mentalist that wants families to know if their husbands or fathers are SUSPECTED of buying sex.
Ask made her controversial statements at a parliament seminar on prostitution, saying that a sex-buyer's family and friends should be informed.
"I could imagine having envelopes in a very garish colour and sending them home to people suspected of this offence," she said.
This goes against everything a modern day justice system should be. According to this woman, who hopefully for her sake had been licking on toads before saying these things, you only need to be a SUSPECT for buying sex and everyone should know about it.
WE CANNOT HAVE A PERSON REPRESENTING THE LAW AND GOVERNMENT SAYING AND ARGUING SUCH THINGS!!
She must resign.
During the time of the current administration several ministers have resign for lesser things like not paying fees; this is much, much worse.
Wanting to use armed police to force kids to take drug tests without parents consent was bad enough; this is however the worst thing a representative of government and the law can say.
If she gets her way, lots of innocent people will be branded among their peers forever.
She must resign!
And those mentalists and soul-sucking entities in suits sitting in government; they cannot have a person like this around. How can they win a general election or even talk about what they want to do with the country with a lose time-bomb like her around? The correct political decision is to sack her, now.
Strangely the news hardly brings this INNOCENT thing up. What the hell are journalists doing!?
What if a journalist have juicy story about some police officers or a member of parliament and the moment they are about to break it, suddenly an illuminated envelop pops up and everyone thinks that journalist is a pervert.
Anyone can become a SUSPECT.
You can visit some escort service online or walk down the wrong street and you’re a SUSPECT.
I’ve never been in a rally my entire life, but if there are some people out there wanting to fill the streets and burn torches outside parliament until this horrific woman is thrown out, I’m there.
This is by far the most dangerous and outrageous statement and opinion ever uttered by a minister during my lifetime.
She must resign!
Ask made her controversial statements at a parliament seminar on prostitution, saying that a sex-buyer's family and friends should be informed.
"I could imagine having envelopes in a very garish colour and sending them home to people suspected of this offence," she said.
This goes against everything a modern day justice system should be. According to this woman, who hopefully for her sake had been licking on toads before saying these things, you only need to be a SUSPECT for buying sex and everyone should know about it.
WE CANNOT HAVE A PERSON REPRESENTING THE LAW AND GOVERNMENT SAYING AND ARGUING SUCH THINGS!!
She must resign.
During the time of the current administration several ministers have resign for lesser things like not paying fees; this is much, much worse.
Wanting to use armed police to force kids to take drug tests without parents consent was bad enough; this is however the worst thing a representative of government and the law can say.
If she gets her way, lots of innocent people will be branded among their peers forever.
She must resign!
And those mentalists and soul-sucking entities in suits sitting in government; they cannot have a person like this around. How can they win a general election or even talk about what they want to do with the country with a lose time-bomb like her around? The correct political decision is to sack her, now.
Strangely the news hardly brings this INNOCENT thing up. What the hell are journalists doing!?
What if a journalist have juicy story about some police officers or a member of parliament and the moment they are about to break it, suddenly an illuminated envelop pops up and everyone thinks that journalist is a pervert.
Anyone can become a SUSPECT.
You can visit some escort service online or walk down the wrong street and you’re a SUSPECT.
I’ve never been in a rally my entire life, but if there are some people out there wanting to fill the streets and burn torches outside parliament until this horrific woman is thrown out, I’m there.
This is by far the most dangerous and outrageous statement and opinion ever uttered by a minister during my lifetime.
She must resign!
We must cloak the ship captain!
Published in the journal Science German scientists say they have created a three-dimensional invisibility cloak. Of course this is on a microscopic level and more testing is needed, I can still not help thinking space travel and hiding a ship of exploring humans from some menacing aliens.
Also, these advances in optics could one day be used in telecommunications or computer technology or simply to further scientific knowledge. If this claim holds that is.
But any sci-fi applications are probably centuries away and even human size objects will take decades before we’re able to cloak, but the technology is seemingly there which always is fun. Now we’re waiting for fusion generators and better equipment and our journey among the stars may begin.
Well, Mars first, we need to colonize another planet nearby before embarking on longer travels. And hopefully we do that soon, before we’ve destroyed our current one.
Also, these advances in optics could one day be used in telecommunications or computer technology or simply to further scientific knowledge. If this claim holds that is.
But any sci-fi applications are probably centuries away and even human size objects will take decades before we’re able to cloak, but the technology is seemingly there which always is fun. Now we’re waiting for fusion generators and better equipment and our journey among the stars may begin.
Well, Mars first, we need to colonize another planet nearby before embarking on longer travels. And hopefully we do that soon, before we’ve destroyed our current one.
The Justice Mentalist from hell
The four-winged soul-killer and devourer of innocence, Sweden’s Justice Mentalist, Beatrice Ask, is at it again.
She started with imposing and supporting the greatest control-grid ever seen outside totalitarian societies hence destroying most of Swedish democracy. Then she set out to force adolescent kids to take drug tests without parents consent. Just to mentioned a few of the nightmarish lunacies she conjures up together with the rest of the criminals.
Unt now she wants so called sex-offenders to receive illuminated letters in snail-mail so everyone knows about it, including the family. The really funny thing is that during a seminar recently this fascist said that everyone surrounding any SUSPECTED offender should know about it.
Revel in that for a moment. You only need to be a suspect and then wham-bam-bom and everyone around you thinks you’re a pervert. And this for a ‘crime’ that’s not really a crime - buying and selling sex should of course be legal.
The justice system in Sweden is slowly, but surely, turning everyone into a criminal and at the forefront we have the Mentalists of government.
Where the hell is my pitchfork?!
She started with imposing and supporting the greatest control-grid ever seen outside totalitarian societies hence destroying most of Swedish democracy. Then she set out to force adolescent kids to take drug tests without parents consent. Just to mentioned a few of the nightmarish lunacies she conjures up together with the rest of the criminals.
Unt now she wants so called sex-offenders to receive illuminated letters in snail-mail so everyone knows about it, including the family. The really funny thing is that during a seminar recently this fascist said that everyone surrounding any SUSPECTED offender should know about it.
Revel in that for a moment. You only need to be a suspect and then wham-bam-bom and everyone around you thinks you’re a pervert. And this for a ‘crime’ that’s not really a crime - buying and selling sex should of course be legal.
The justice system in Sweden is slowly, but surely, turning everyone into a criminal and at the forefront we have the Mentalists of government.
Where the hell is my pitchfork?!
Greece ‘threatens’ with IMF
Since both the rules of the Eurozone and Germany is against bailing out defaulting Greece it seems that the olive oiled ones are threatening to call in the International Monetary Fund unless Brussels comes up with real money on acceptable terms within a week.
So instead of Britain, Germany, France and the rest bailing them out the IMF i.e. Britain, Germany, France and the rest will bail them out. Remember how these countries, the US and some others are paying for all the IMF scams? Well, they do, so no real difference really other than that IMF probably is a worse choice and the money will be more of a loan then aid as the case would be if the Euro countries stepped in.
I wonder what Italy, Portugal and Spain will threaten with when they start to collapse?
So instead of Britain, Germany, France and the rest bailing them out the IMF i.e. Britain, Germany, France and the rest will bail them out. Remember how these countries, the US and some others are paying for all the IMF scams? Well, they do, so no real difference really other than that IMF probably is a worse choice and the money will be more of a loan then aid as the case would be if the Euro countries stepped in.
I wonder what Italy, Portugal and Spain will threaten with when they start to collapse?
The billions aren’t enough
The deeply socialist state of Haiti is apparently in trouble again. Didn’t I tell you so months ago?
It seems that the billions upon billions in aid sent alongside with thousands of rescue workers and massive amounts of containers filled with food, blankets and such didn’t help much. Comes hurricanes or flooding now, which they most likely will, thousands more will needlessly die.
This is what happens when you let leftie policies run amok and warlords and corrupt politicians run the show. And aid? Please. How many hundreds of billions haven’t Ethiopia got throughout the years, and they still have ten million people starving being just one step away from the river Styx.
It’s not money these people need, it’s not blankets or foreign doctors, and they certainly do not need the ex-presidents W-chimp and the McDonald’s munching Cunt’on, do help them.
What they need are self-reliant citizens with an understanding on how to build houses. What they need is an armed populace able to defend themselves and their property against thieving lefties. What they need is freedom and a minimalistic government that stay out of peoples affairs. What they need is capitalism.
Lefties always blame some outside force. It didn’t rain enough in East Germany. The sun shines only on South Korea thanks to an American conspiracy. Stalin only murdered tens of millions of people because he was unjustly attacked by right-wing media in Europe. Pol-Pot’s schemes would have worked if only crops hadn’t died because of flooding. Cuba would be the richest country on the planet if it wasn’t for American embargoes.
But as we well know it doesn’t stop in true communist/socialist countries, the same sort’s of argument can be heard within our own borders. The schools aren’t teaching good enough because of lack of funding, the poor only need more welfare checks and they will be fine, and if we only throw more billions at the health-care system it will work perfectly.
Listening to a socialist it would seem that if only Mother Nature could be controlled and more billions could be spent then the shiny pinkish heaven of socialism would work its magic and everyone would be happy and equal.
Haiti is no exception to this asylum-thinking.
We need to send more money, they need more blankets and if only the big corporations hadn’t robbed the island everything would be fine.
The only reason I can think of why people buy these sorts of mad ideas is the immediate emotional response mechanism we have built-in in our genetic make-up.
When we see starving people, suffering families and disastrous situations and our heart bleeds, we want to help and help now. We scream about the injustice and as soon as someone says we need to send aid we nod emphatically. It seems like a good idea, it sounds like we’ve thought it through, send help now and more help later and everything will be fine.
This isn’t so. In fact, sending help all the time may actually, in the long run, hurt the needy more than if we do nothing.
I am not saying they don’t need help and there are situation whereas even the richest and most powerful nations do need assistance. What I am saying is that any help given need to be thoughtful and not only help now but, more importantly, help later.
The things and money already sent to Haiti is more than enough. We’ve probably even sent too much. What they need more of now is instruction manuals, maybe a couple of teachers and a realization that it can happen again and they need to build a society capable of cooping. They need guns, lots of them. An armed populace cannot be robbed by government. Maybe we can send seeds and some equipment, but otherwise they should fend for themselves and would be able to do so if only they had more capitalism.
It seems that the billions upon billions in aid sent alongside with thousands of rescue workers and massive amounts of containers filled with food, blankets and such didn’t help much. Comes hurricanes or flooding now, which they most likely will, thousands more will needlessly die.
This is what happens when you let leftie policies run amok and warlords and corrupt politicians run the show. And aid? Please. How many hundreds of billions haven’t Ethiopia got throughout the years, and they still have ten million people starving being just one step away from the river Styx.
It’s not money these people need, it’s not blankets or foreign doctors, and they certainly do not need the ex-presidents W-chimp and the McDonald’s munching Cunt’on, do help them.
What they need are self-reliant citizens with an understanding on how to build houses. What they need is an armed populace able to defend themselves and their property against thieving lefties. What they need is freedom and a minimalistic government that stay out of peoples affairs. What they need is capitalism.
Lefties always blame some outside force. It didn’t rain enough in East Germany. The sun shines only on South Korea thanks to an American conspiracy. Stalin only murdered tens of millions of people because he was unjustly attacked by right-wing media in Europe. Pol-Pot’s schemes would have worked if only crops hadn’t died because of flooding. Cuba would be the richest country on the planet if it wasn’t for American embargoes.
But as we well know it doesn’t stop in true communist/socialist countries, the same sort’s of argument can be heard within our own borders. The schools aren’t teaching good enough because of lack of funding, the poor only need more welfare checks and they will be fine, and if we only throw more billions at the health-care system it will work perfectly.
Listening to a socialist it would seem that if only Mother Nature could be controlled and more billions could be spent then the shiny pinkish heaven of socialism would work its magic and everyone would be happy and equal.
Haiti is no exception to this asylum-thinking.
We need to send more money, they need more blankets and if only the big corporations hadn’t robbed the island everything would be fine.
The only reason I can think of why people buy these sorts of mad ideas is the immediate emotional response mechanism we have built-in in our genetic make-up.
When we see starving people, suffering families and disastrous situations and our heart bleeds, we want to help and help now. We scream about the injustice and as soon as someone says we need to send aid we nod emphatically. It seems like a good idea, it sounds like we’ve thought it through, send help now and more help later and everything will be fine.
This isn’t so. In fact, sending help all the time may actually, in the long run, hurt the needy more than if we do nothing.
I am not saying they don’t need help and there are situation whereas even the richest and most powerful nations do need assistance. What I am saying is that any help given need to be thoughtful and not only help now but, more importantly, help later.
The things and money already sent to Haiti is more than enough. We’ve probably even sent too much. What they need more of now is instruction manuals, maybe a couple of teachers and a realization that it can happen again and they need to build a society capable of cooping. They need guns, lots of them. An armed populace cannot be robbed by government. Maybe we can send seeds and some equipment, but otherwise they should fend for themselves and would be able to do so if only they had more capitalism.
Thursday, March 18, 2010
A memorial day, really?
Yes, the loony Defense Mentalist of Sweden have decided that it is time we supported our under-equipped non-combatant ‘guards’ (?) of peace and give them salutes, a costly monument and their own memorial day.
This is laughable on so many levels. Not the supporting the troops idea, I am all for getting behind Swedish soldiers and would probably be one myself if we actually fought in war protecting freedom and capitalism. This isn’t the case though.
I do guess seeing the occasional dead dog and Muslim families starving because of American Imperialism do take its toll. Cleaning an AK-5 each day isn’t fun and driving around in vehicles a beebee-gun easily could penetrate the hull of may raise the pulse a percentage or two, but it is not really the stuff of legends worthy of monuments now is it?
Reading how we should “rally behind our troops” and how the dead coming home in coffins are heroes and now this load of manure makes me think this is some sort of parody of American movies.
Listening to a US president when he’s saying these sorts of things have a certain feel to it that almost sound real and honest. Hearing Swedish politicians saying the same thing about Swedish soldiers who are mostly engaged in the grisly and difficult task of handing out candy and water to the local drug farmers in Afghanistan isn’t really the same thing.
Swedish soldiers haven’t been involved in any conflict since the Napoleonic wars 200 years ago but they do have a good reputation internationally and we had done some good throughout the years, mainly under UN-flag.
Helping war criminals slaughtering Muslims isn’t the highlight of peace-keeping though, but maybe they deserve some recognition. A cake and some lemonade at the airport after finishing their tour, a medal for the heroics of protecting a growly hillside of dirt no-one want - that sort of thing.
But a monument? Why? Are our politicians running out of things to throw money at? And a memorial day? Please... for what exactly? If they feel it necessary to build a statue or memorialize someone, do it for the men and women trying to work within the bureaucratic public health-care system. Or how about building a statue over the common man, who is overtaxed, over-regulated, monitored by dozens of agencies and hardly can get to work because paying for gasoline takes almost all of the salary the government hasn’t already stolen.
Okay, let’s say we should be more positive and supportive of Swedish troops; I’m not totally estranged to that idea. But does that include all tasks and conflicts?
Patrolling the Gaza strip or standing in-between Turkish and Greek forces on Cypress isn’t really the same thing as backing up British troops fighting an unjust and illegal war in Afghanistan. Helping people in Congo isn’t the same as helping US marines and the CIA grow poppy fields.
The Swedish Defense Mentalist seemingly wants to appeal to our national feeling and some conservative vein of pride over soldiers in general. That’s idiotic at best, dangerous at worst. Soldiers protecting their own country or in unison with others protecting peace and democracy by presence is one thing, indirectly helping with the murder of millions of Muslims is another.
The troops should come home and be stationed around our border, not be in a far away country protecting a corrupt regime and aiding a warring faction in a conflict we have nothing to do with.
I’m not supportive of the Defense Mentalist ludicrous ideas and will certainly not be waving any flags over troops helping others commit war-crimes. This has a vile stench to it and the Swedish people should recognize that and demand we bring our boys home.
This is laughable on so many levels. Not the supporting the troops idea, I am all for getting behind Swedish soldiers and would probably be one myself if we actually fought in war protecting freedom and capitalism. This isn’t the case though.
I do guess seeing the occasional dead dog and Muslim families starving because of American Imperialism do take its toll. Cleaning an AK-5 each day isn’t fun and driving around in vehicles a beebee-gun easily could penetrate the hull of may raise the pulse a percentage or two, but it is not really the stuff of legends worthy of monuments now is it?
Reading how we should “rally behind our troops” and how the dead coming home in coffins are heroes and now this load of manure makes me think this is some sort of parody of American movies.
Listening to a US president when he’s saying these sorts of things have a certain feel to it that almost sound real and honest. Hearing Swedish politicians saying the same thing about Swedish soldiers who are mostly engaged in the grisly and difficult task of handing out candy and water to the local drug farmers in Afghanistan isn’t really the same thing.
Swedish soldiers haven’t been involved in any conflict since the Napoleonic wars 200 years ago but they do have a good reputation internationally and we had done some good throughout the years, mainly under UN-flag.
Helping war criminals slaughtering Muslims isn’t the highlight of peace-keeping though, but maybe they deserve some recognition. A cake and some lemonade at the airport after finishing their tour, a medal for the heroics of protecting a growly hillside of dirt no-one want - that sort of thing.
But a monument? Why? Are our politicians running out of things to throw money at? And a memorial day? Please... for what exactly? If they feel it necessary to build a statue or memorialize someone, do it for the men and women trying to work within the bureaucratic public health-care system. Or how about building a statue over the common man, who is overtaxed, over-regulated, monitored by dozens of agencies and hardly can get to work because paying for gasoline takes almost all of the salary the government hasn’t already stolen.
Okay, let’s say we should be more positive and supportive of Swedish troops; I’m not totally estranged to that idea. But does that include all tasks and conflicts?
Patrolling the Gaza strip or standing in-between Turkish and Greek forces on Cypress isn’t really the same thing as backing up British troops fighting an unjust and illegal war in Afghanistan. Helping people in Congo isn’t the same as helping US marines and the CIA grow poppy fields.
The Swedish Defense Mentalist seemingly wants to appeal to our national feeling and some conservative vein of pride over soldiers in general. That’s idiotic at best, dangerous at worst. Soldiers protecting their own country or in unison with others protecting peace and democracy by presence is one thing, indirectly helping with the murder of millions of Muslims is another.
The troops should come home and be stationed around our border, not be in a far away country protecting a corrupt regime and aiding a warring faction in a conflict we have nothing to do with.
I’m not supportive of the Defense Mentalist ludicrous ideas and will certainly not be waving any flags over troops helping others commit war-crimes. This has a vile stench to it and the Swedish people should recognize that and demand we bring our boys home.
Why are we debating this?
A 31-year-old woman, who is completely paralyzed and has been on a respirator since she was six, has demanded the right to die in a letter to the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.
The woman was born with a neurological illness that has led to a continuous deterioration of her condition. In her letter to the board she writes that she would have suffocated herself if only she had been able.
The woman has asked the welfare board that she be allowed to be put to sleep so that she can die with dignity.
Apparently there’s a debate over this.
What the fuck is there to debate over!? She wants to die, let her. Why is that so difficult?
If someone wants to cut their legs off, put on non-matching socks or hang themselves, that their decision. As long as there’s no coercion or threat every person should decide over their own body and life.
But of course we need to acknowledge that in most countries, Sweden in particular, the government owns you. They decide where you should be born, where you can be buried and whether or not you can watch certain movies, so maybe I shouldn't be surprised over people debating a person’s right to his/her own life.
This is a non-issue, stop debating and let her go in peace.
The woman was born with a neurological illness that has led to a continuous deterioration of her condition. In her letter to the board she writes that she would have suffocated herself if only she had been able.
The woman has asked the welfare board that she be allowed to be put to sleep so that she can die with dignity.
Apparently there’s a debate over this.
What the fuck is there to debate over!? She wants to die, let her. Why is that so difficult?
If someone wants to cut their legs off, put on non-matching socks or hang themselves, that their decision. As long as there’s no coercion or threat every person should decide over their own body and life.
But of course we need to acknowledge that in most countries, Sweden in particular, the government owns you. They decide where you should be born, where you can be buried and whether or not you can watch certain movies, so maybe I shouldn't be surprised over people debating a person’s right to his/her own life.
This is a non-issue, stop debating and let her go in peace.
The She-devil is at it again
Swedish Social Democrat leader Mona Sahlin has blasted Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan over threats that he would consider ordering 100,000 Armenians to leave Turkey.
I hardly see why.
Firstly those 100,000 Armenians the Turkish guy talked about are not Turkish citizens and he’s not considering throwing out the 50,000 or so Armenians with Turkish passports, only those dwelling within Turkish borders without citizenship.
I know there are semantics here, but if we stick to this fact alone, which country in this world would allow them to stay? Sweden certainly wouldn’t. Or is the ugly supposed female Sahlin telling me that her party hasn’t thrown out thousands of people for the very same reason?
If Sweden had 100,000 of any kind of nationality within its borders, ‘illegally’, they would also, with a few working people as exceptions, live under the threat of getting thrown out.
Secondly, the most xenophobic political party in Sweden is the Social Democrats. Not officially or seemingly looking how they have let in tens of thousands of people, but rather how refugees and immigrants are threated on the labor market and in society.
The lefties love immigrants because they are easily fooled into welfare and state-dependence and so will vote for the left. But lefties hate immigrants even more since they do everything they can to keep them out of the working force and down in suburbs and poverty.
Oh, and remember how they treat Polish doctors or Estonian construction workers? Conform, obey or get out is the message sent to those from the Social Democrats.
The so called “racist” party doesn’t want immigrants or at least less of them. To me this is more honest then to let people come and then threat them like shitty voting machines.
And the bitch herself who’ve hired black laborers, paid for her own lavish lifestyle with parliament credit-cards, travel around the world courtesy of taxpayers and never done an honest day work of her entire life, shouldn’t say a word.
I think we can deal with Turkey. They give us 100,000 Armenians and we give them 100 prominent Social Democrats.
I hardly see why.
Firstly those 100,000 Armenians the Turkish guy talked about are not Turkish citizens and he’s not considering throwing out the 50,000 or so Armenians with Turkish passports, only those dwelling within Turkish borders without citizenship.
I know there are semantics here, but if we stick to this fact alone, which country in this world would allow them to stay? Sweden certainly wouldn’t. Or is the ugly supposed female Sahlin telling me that her party hasn’t thrown out thousands of people for the very same reason?
If Sweden had 100,000 of any kind of nationality within its borders, ‘illegally’, they would also, with a few working people as exceptions, live under the threat of getting thrown out.
Secondly, the most xenophobic political party in Sweden is the Social Democrats. Not officially or seemingly looking how they have let in tens of thousands of people, but rather how refugees and immigrants are threated on the labor market and in society.
The lefties love immigrants because they are easily fooled into welfare and state-dependence and so will vote for the left. But lefties hate immigrants even more since they do everything they can to keep them out of the working force and down in suburbs and poverty.
Oh, and remember how they treat Polish doctors or Estonian construction workers? Conform, obey or get out is the message sent to those from the Social Democrats.
The so called “racist” party doesn’t want immigrants or at least less of them. To me this is more honest then to let people come and then threat them like shitty voting machines.
And the bitch herself who’ve hired black laborers, paid for her own lavish lifestyle with parliament credit-cards, travel around the world courtesy of taxpayers and never done an honest day work of her entire life, shouldn’t say a word.
I think we can deal with Turkey. They give us 100,000 Armenians and we give them 100 prominent Social Democrats.
Sophie Zelmani have a new record out
There are very few artists I’m willing to pay for listening to; Sophie Zelmani is one of those few. You see most artists release an album that maybe contains one or two good songs, or they release one record that is good and the rest is crap.
Sophie never lets you down.
Her blissful and joyful country-like pop have a slight suicidal touch I love. Kind of like a happy and enjoyable melancholy, if there is such a thing. Although she’s not always perfect in the English language her songs are like embalmment to the soul. I can listen to her all day and love every minute of it and still not remember a single song or note. Every time I turn her music on I zone out and when the music stops, I’m back. Kind of like mediation.
Despite still being pretty unknown she sells hundreds of thousands of records each year and is loved as few artists are.
Oh, and did I mention she is sexy as hell?
Sophie never lets you down.
Her blissful and joyful country-like pop have a slight suicidal touch I love. Kind of like a happy and enjoyable melancholy, if there is such a thing. Although she’s not always perfect in the English language her songs are like embalmment to the soul. I can listen to her all day and love every minute of it and still not remember a single song or note. Every time I turn her music on I zone out and when the music stops, I’m back. Kind of like mediation.
Despite still being pretty unknown she sells hundreds of thousands of records each year and is loved as few artists are.
Oh, and did I mention she is sexy as hell?
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Socialism works!
The pink shimmering leftie heaven of North Korea have proven itself a lot lately.
A couple of days ago a man got executed for cell phone use. North Korea has stringent laws regarding cell phone usage. The authorities only allow folks to make national calls and even these ones are restricted to the Pyongyang area. Thus, there was a ban on making any international calls. But one man didn’t obey the governments rule, and consequently and rightfully, he got shot. Disobeying government is horrifying and the socialists need to show this and put the people back on track so to say.
The cell phone user was killed via firing squad for disobeying the law, apparently a favorite way of execution among lefties in North Korea since another man got shot at a firing range yesterday blamed for the failed currency reform.
As we all know the state is never wrong so when an economist get orders to do something and fails, it is not the governments fault, it is the economists for not doing his job. Also, he was an anti-revolutionary element and a son of a large landlord who sneaked into revolutionary ranks and deliberately sabotaged the state economy.
Thankfully the North Korean people always have lots of food on the table and the happiest life of any people on this planet.
Socialism works!
A couple of days ago a man got executed for cell phone use. North Korea has stringent laws regarding cell phone usage. The authorities only allow folks to make national calls and even these ones are restricted to the Pyongyang area. Thus, there was a ban on making any international calls. But one man didn’t obey the governments rule, and consequently and rightfully, he got shot. Disobeying government is horrifying and the socialists need to show this and put the people back on track so to say.
The cell phone user was killed via firing squad for disobeying the law, apparently a favorite way of execution among lefties in North Korea since another man got shot at a firing range yesterday blamed for the failed currency reform.
As we all know the state is never wrong so when an economist get orders to do something and fails, it is not the governments fault, it is the economists for not doing his job. Also, he was an anti-revolutionary element and a son of a large landlord who sneaked into revolutionary ranks and deliberately sabotaged the state economy.
Thankfully the North Korean people always have lots of food on the table and the happiest life of any people on this planet.
Socialism works!
Silence of the libidos
As by nature given the creatures we call humans have gender. They come in male and female variants. Nature have made it so that sexual reproduction is the way to increase the number of humans, even though we today have the technology to use tubes, the basic ‘sperm meets egg’ process is the same.
The gender of this particular species, as most other animals, means differences. For instance males have evolved larger and more muscle mass and like to build phallus shaped rockets to kill other humans and the females are able to perform tasks like cooking and felatio.
However, this gender difference is now running the risk of becoming obsolet
For about a year ago I wrote about a couple of Swedish parents (I use the term “parents” very loosely...) that refuses to raise their kid according “societies rules for gender”. As you might have guessed Sweden’s psychiatric care leaves a lot to be desired...
Although the… parents in this case yet hadn’t named their poor child I dubbed their ‘genderless’ child “Buffalo Bill” after that funny cellar dwelling man in the movie with Jodie Foster. That name seemed appropriate for several reasons.
There’s no secret that this sort of asylum-fabricated way of life is the happy wet dream of many feminists. But it is not only feminists living in a reality far, far away that have such notions. The politically correct thing to say and think today is that there isn’t or, at least, shouldn’t be any differences. None at all.
As read over at Leg Iron and seen in this little article from The Telegraph, someone has already taken the next step.
A person without gender…
There is a difference between the stories. In one case it was an adult making his/her/its decision, the other is more forced upon by the parents of Sweden’s next serial killer. But the interlocking consequence of stories like these and many more soon to follow is problematic.
I wonder if this is the future we are heading for if we let the politically correct run the show for a couple of decades more. All humans forced into unification chambers to remove all signs of gender and a very strict population control.
Frankly it wouldn’t surprise me.
The gender of this particular species, as most other animals, means differences. For instance males have evolved larger and more muscle mass and like to build phallus shaped rockets to kill other humans and the females are able to perform tasks like cooking and felatio.
However, this gender difference is now running the risk of becoming obsolet
For about a year ago I wrote about a couple of Swedish parents (I use the term “parents” very loosely...) that refuses to raise their kid according “societies rules for gender”. As you might have guessed Sweden’s psychiatric care leaves a lot to be desired...
Although the… parents in this case yet hadn’t named their poor child I dubbed their ‘genderless’ child “Buffalo Bill” after that funny cellar dwelling man in the movie with Jodie Foster. That name seemed appropriate for several reasons.
There’s no secret that this sort of asylum-fabricated way of life is the happy wet dream of many feminists. But it is not only feminists living in a reality far, far away that have such notions. The politically correct thing to say and think today is that there isn’t or, at least, shouldn’t be any differences. None at all.
As read over at Leg Iron and seen in this little article from The Telegraph, someone has already taken the next step.
A person without gender…
There is a difference between the stories. In one case it was an adult making his/her/its decision, the other is more forced upon by the parents of Sweden’s next serial killer. But the interlocking consequence of stories like these and many more soon to follow is problematic.
I wonder if this is the future we are heading for if we let the politically correct run the show for a couple of decades more. All humans forced into unification chambers to remove all signs of gender and a very strict population control.
Frankly it wouldn’t surprise me.
Speaking of unexplained things…
Let's say you are deep into debt and your debt is growing out of control and the only thing you have done to stop this is to print more IOU’s and released many of your criminals out of prison. Your economy is in trouble and there’s no real way out of it.
And your biggest creditor you treat like… well, this…
Is that a good idea?
There have been tires, steal and currency fights between US and China for a while now. So far the co-dependence have hold back the wolfs, but how long will that last? And, as seen over the last couple of months, China is apparently already selling off US treasuries.
I’ve said it all along; the only thing missing in our current mess is more protectionism. Sure there’s been a slight increase and the French are screaming about their farmers as usual, but otherwise it has been pretty quiet on the protectionist front. That’s IF you don’t count the different stimulus thrown at this or that industry.
Globalization as in trade and cross-border agreements is always a good thing. Not only economically, but it also creates agreements, an understanding and a dialog between nations and races otherwise at each other’s throats.
So surely US politicians aren’t that stupid, so crazy and illiterate that they mess it up with China and so, most likely, destroys the dollar?
Well…
And your biggest creditor you treat like… well, this…
Is that a good idea?
There have been tires, steal and currency fights between US and China for a while now. So far the co-dependence have hold back the wolfs, but how long will that last? And, as seen over the last couple of months, China is apparently already selling off US treasuries.
I’ve said it all along; the only thing missing in our current mess is more protectionism. Sure there’s been a slight increase and the French are screaming about their farmers as usual, but otherwise it has been pretty quiet on the protectionist front. That’s IF you don’t count the different stimulus thrown at this or that industry.
Globalization as in trade and cross-border agreements is always a good thing. Not only economically, but it also creates agreements, an understanding and a dialog between nations and races otherwise at each other’s throats.
So surely US politicians aren’t that stupid, so crazy and illiterate that they mess it up with China and so, most likely, destroys the dollar?
Well…
Man used penis to assault female police officer
In a very strange tale I just read over at BBC we learn:
Police were called to his home by his girlfriend, who had complained about him being drunk last November. They arrived to find the self-employed engineer sitting on the sofa wearing a pair of underpants.
Okay…
Fiscal depute Elaine Lynch said: "The accused got to his feet and was standing over the police officer exposing his penis and thrusting it in her face, forcing her to take evasive action to avoid getting struck."
Here’s my problem. How tall is this guy? Or, maybe: how smallish is the officer?
Can someone explain this to me?
I read about it in other news as well, nowhere do they explain how this comes to be. Did he strike her down first? Obviously not since he’s not accused of that. Did the female officer go down on her knees? Well, in my mind she did... just watched some porn so… well, you get the idea…
Seriously, how did this happen? And by the way, when someone takes out his willy and thrust it in your face, and you’re an police officer, do you really take “evasive action”?
Police were called to his home by his girlfriend, who had complained about him being drunk last November. They arrived to find the self-employed engineer sitting on the sofa wearing a pair of underpants.
Okay…
Fiscal depute Elaine Lynch said: "The accused got to his feet and was standing over the police officer exposing his penis and thrusting it in her face, forcing her to take evasive action to avoid getting struck."
Here’s my problem. How tall is this guy? Or, maybe: how smallish is the officer?
Can someone explain this to me?
I read about it in other news as well, nowhere do they explain how this comes to be. Did he strike her down first? Obviously not since he’s not accused of that. Did the female officer go down on her knees? Well, in my mind she did... just watched some porn so… well, you get the idea…
Seriously, how did this happen? And by the way, when someone takes out his willy and thrust it in your face, and you’re an police officer, do you really take “evasive action”?
Unions VS companies
It is that time of the year when nationwide and over the top unions have meetings with their company counterparts in order to set salaries for the employed.
Sadly, as usual, no-one of the involved are thinking outside the box or taking our future and our reality into account.
Unions are demanding sky-high salary increases at a time when pay should be going down.
Company chieftains and CEO’s in turn are giving themselves absurd increases by hundreds of percent on already, in most cases, too high wages. This is of course yet another idiocy that increases union demands.
And thanks to the central bank, and their kill-what’s-left-of-the-economy policy, inflation is on the rise while bubbles are forming in the economy. Meanwhile the government is doing their best to alienate as many as possible.
No-one seem to recognize that we are in a dangerous situation with very shaky fundaments comes to both our own and the world’s economy. It is not only Greece, Portugal, Spain and the Baltic States that are in trouble. UK and the US are also not yet over the hill and are far more likely to plummet down again then to actually reach a steady foundation again.
I understand both sides in the Employees VS Employer debacle. Companies have done badly, in general, lately and some of them probably see the peril we’re in. Unions only see to their own members and CEO’s divulging themselves into feasts doesn’t make things better.
This is likely a recipe of disaster, one way or the other.
So what should or can be done?
Well, firstly companies and their so called leaders need to acknowledge how bad it looks when in time of a recession and layoffs they increase their own. It looks greedy and even worse, it is very bad leadership. To lead is to be an example, not only barking out orders or look at economic graphs. To me it seems that Sweden has bad management also within companies. Maybe the unions should, in exchange for smaller or zero increases, demand that CEO’s and others elevated people cut their salaries?
Secondly we need unions to accept that private companies are not theirs to control or be masters over. They should fight for their members, sure, but that also means that sometimes they need to understand basic economics and see that too high increases may serve some, but be disastrous for many. Unions don’t really fight for their members and they certainly do not fight for their unemployed members. This need to change.
But most importantly, we need lower taxes. Pay increases is one thing, what you can buy with your salary is another. In this regard the current Swedish government has taken slight baby steps towards a better situation, but not nearly enough.
Basically we don’t have time or the resources to fight over a couple of bucks, so I do hope a agreement can be reach fast and that they are reasonable from each part.
Sadly, as usual, no-one of the involved are thinking outside the box or taking our future and our reality into account.
Unions are demanding sky-high salary increases at a time when pay should be going down.
Company chieftains and CEO’s in turn are giving themselves absurd increases by hundreds of percent on already, in most cases, too high wages. This is of course yet another idiocy that increases union demands.
And thanks to the central bank, and their kill-what’s-left-of-the-economy policy, inflation is on the rise while bubbles are forming in the economy. Meanwhile the government is doing their best to alienate as many as possible.
No-one seem to recognize that we are in a dangerous situation with very shaky fundaments comes to both our own and the world’s economy. It is not only Greece, Portugal, Spain and the Baltic States that are in trouble. UK and the US are also not yet over the hill and are far more likely to plummet down again then to actually reach a steady foundation again.
I understand both sides in the Employees VS Employer debacle. Companies have done badly, in general, lately and some of them probably see the peril we’re in. Unions only see to their own members and CEO’s divulging themselves into feasts doesn’t make things better.
This is likely a recipe of disaster, one way or the other.
So what should or can be done?
Well, firstly companies and their so called leaders need to acknowledge how bad it looks when in time of a recession and layoffs they increase their own. It looks greedy and even worse, it is very bad leadership. To lead is to be an example, not only barking out orders or look at economic graphs. To me it seems that Sweden has bad management also within companies. Maybe the unions should, in exchange for smaller or zero increases, demand that CEO’s and others elevated people cut their salaries?
Secondly we need unions to accept that private companies are not theirs to control or be masters over. They should fight for their members, sure, but that also means that sometimes they need to understand basic economics and see that too high increases may serve some, but be disastrous for many. Unions don’t really fight for their members and they certainly do not fight for their unemployed members. This need to change.
But most importantly, we need lower taxes. Pay increases is one thing, what you can buy with your salary is another. In this regard the current Swedish government has taken slight baby steps towards a better situation, but not nearly enough.
Basically we don’t have time or the resources to fight over a couple of bucks, so I do hope a agreement can be reach fast and that they are reasonable from each part.
A new record
House prices in Sweden reached a new record with the average house now costing SEK 2 million ($282 000).
And this during a time of high unemployment and within a recession (in reality a depression). Companies have been doing pretty badly and the world is still in a shaky condition. Country after country is closing in on default and there are still wars raging in oil producing countries.
Still there are those that claim that we don’t have a housing bubble…
Can you say ‘clueless’?
And this during a time of high unemployment and within a recession (in reality a depression). Companies have been doing pretty badly and the world is still in a shaky condition. Country after country is closing in on default and there are still wars raging in oil producing countries.
Still there are those that claim that we don’t have a housing bubble…
Can you say ‘clueless’?
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Another non-shooting
A 21 year old was not shot twice yesterday. Apparently the 21y old and a friend weren’t sitting in a car in the city of Malmö when a man didn’t walk up to em and fire a couple of shots with a gun. It seems that the shooter, who doesn’t exist, had a bad aim since he only hit the shoulder twice.
This is just one in a long line of shootings, which never happen, recently.
In Sweden such events don’t take place since we have strict anti-gun laws and self-defense is outlawed. Guns are banned and so shootings never occur in my birth nation.
This is just one in a long line of shootings, which never happen, recently.
In Sweden such events don’t take place since we have strict anti-gun laws and self-defense is outlawed. Guns are banned and so shootings never occur in my birth nation.
mon petit creme brulee
The obese dictator of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, that has decided that violent videogames and toys, according to his views, should be banned in Venezuela, has now found a new enemy. Well, not so new, the rest of the world’s governments have also targeted the same enemy so for once the plump totalitarian is in good company.
Chavez, as the quote-maker that he is has said that “PlayStation is poison” and now he’s uttered another nice thingy worthy of any government near you:
"The Internet cannot be something open where anything is said and done.”
Isn’t that nice? Dictator Chavez is angry with Venezuelan political opinion and gossip website Noticierodigital oh and twitter which apparently let people say what they want. Also Facebook is a nuisance to him because his adversaries can start their own groups.
Feel familiar? It should, almost exactly the same thing many politicians near you have said. And it could be any of them, any president, any foreign secretary or justice mentalist could have spoken those words. The difference is that Chavez, with the power of the state behind him and as dictator actually can ban and outlaw anything on a whim. Your politician is doing the same thing, only slower and with more sneakiness.
But the argument is very similar. It’s about the Chiiiildreeeen, terrorist use internet, immoral things goes on online.
Chavez has not yet gone as far as his friends in Iran or as the real influence to the West, China, but that’s just a matter of time. Or, if he wants, he can probably get a lot of good pointers from Sweden and our totalitarian control-grid.
Chavez, as the quote-maker that he is has said that “PlayStation is poison” and now he’s uttered another nice thingy worthy of any government near you:
"The Internet cannot be something open where anything is said and done.”
Isn’t that nice? Dictator Chavez is angry with Venezuelan political opinion and gossip website Noticierodigital oh and twitter which apparently let people say what they want. Also Facebook is a nuisance to him because his adversaries can start their own groups.
Feel familiar? It should, almost exactly the same thing many politicians near you have said. And it could be any of them, any president, any foreign secretary or justice mentalist could have spoken those words. The difference is that Chavez, with the power of the state behind him and as dictator actually can ban and outlaw anything on a whim. Your politician is doing the same thing, only slower and with more sneakiness.
But the argument is very similar. It’s about the Chiiiildreeeen, terrorist use internet, immoral things goes on online.
Chavez has not yet gone as far as his friends in Iran or as the real influence to the West, China, but that’s just a matter of time. Or, if he wants, he can probably get a lot of good pointers from Sweden and our totalitarian control-grid.
Cocaine - a loveable enjoyment
A newspaper in Sweden is reporting on that younger females to a larger degree are testing cocaine. Of course this is followed up with celebrities warning about testing the drug and some ‘experts’ saying how dangerous it is.
I have, tested it that is. Cocaine is one of the few drugs that actually holds its ground against alcohol, which I prefer to all else. Really good cocaine is worth both the money and worth the risk albeit a very slim one, of getting hooked. That’s not the political correct thing to say, but it is nevertheless the truth.
Newspapers don’t tell you the truth about drugs in general because there’s an unspoken rule not to say anything that can upset the powers that be or something that can upset obese mothers with an overzealous attitude to start campaigning outside the window.
The truth is you don’t get hooked or become an addict by trying drugs; none of them does that to you, not even tobacco. You can test them all and several times over before your mind or body crave it. It will eventually happen though, so be careful.
Another truth is that most overdoses and gang-related killings are because of the law, not despite of it. It is the law that creates mafias; it is the law that kills, unnecessarily. Without the law banning drugs most criminal gangs and terrorist groups would be without income. Nothing would hurt criminals more that to make drugs legal.
A third truth, which most people already know about, is that drugs make you feel good. People have always wanted drugs, always will have a desire for them and no law, no police and no politician will ever change that. Because we like them.
Me, I stick to alcohol, which is the second worse drug there is after tobacco, but I like it the most. Alcohol is probably the most social drug and very easy to dose correctly. I like sitting around with friends discussing how to best blow up parliament or just mellow in front of my PC with a good bottle of merlot. ‘Illegal’ drugs can seldom be used in that way.
Cocaine is one exception to this rule; thanks to TV cocaine is regarded as a party drug and a very hip one used by the rich and famous. This is, of course, a fact used by media portraying the famous as liable, which is yet another nonsense idea.
Also, cocaine can be used together with for example alcohol. Alcohol is something that cannot be mixed with most other drugs so you’ll better not mix alcohol with ecstasy or GHB. Almost all that dies from GHB for instance have mixed the drug with alcohol, which is very dangerous and a much unknown subject.
You see we’re not told how to use drugs either; we don’t have information available which we would have on an open market. As a consequence many youngsters that otherwise would be alive dies from mixing drugs or from doing bad drugs bought in a dark alley. Again, the law is at fault.
Most drugs are not worth the try, take my word for it. But if you feel the need to, cocaine may be worth it, but if so buy the good stuff, not the crappy shit normally available. If you want to stay away from them all, fine, that’s your choice, me I drink alcohol - each to his own.
I have, tested it that is. Cocaine is one of the few drugs that actually holds its ground against alcohol, which I prefer to all else. Really good cocaine is worth both the money and worth the risk albeit a very slim one, of getting hooked. That’s not the political correct thing to say, but it is nevertheless the truth.
Newspapers don’t tell you the truth about drugs in general because there’s an unspoken rule not to say anything that can upset the powers that be or something that can upset obese mothers with an overzealous attitude to start campaigning outside the window.
The truth is you don’t get hooked or become an addict by trying drugs; none of them does that to you, not even tobacco. You can test them all and several times over before your mind or body crave it. It will eventually happen though, so be careful.
Another truth is that most overdoses and gang-related killings are because of the law, not despite of it. It is the law that creates mafias; it is the law that kills, unnecessarily. Without the law banning drugs most criminal gangs and terrorist groups would be without income. Nothing would hurt criminals more that to make drugs legal.
A third truth, which most people already know about, is that drugs make you feel good. People have always wanted drugs, always will have a desire for them and no law, no police and no politician will ever change that. Because we like them.
Me, I stick to alcohol, which is the second worse drug there is after tobacco, but I like it the most. Alcohol is probably the most social drug and very easy to dose correctly. I like sitting around with friends discussing how to best blow up parliament or just mellow in front of my PC with a good bottle of merlot. ‘Illegal’ drugs can seldom be used in that way.
Cocaine is one exception to this rule; thanks to TV cocaine is regarded as a party drug and a very hip one used by the rich and famous. This is, of course, a fact used by media portraying the famous as liable, which is yet another nonsense idea.
Also, cocaine can be used together with for example alcohol. Alcohol is something that cannot be mixed with most other drugs so you’ll better not mix alcohol with ecstasy or GHB. Almost all that dies from GHB for instance have mixed the drug with alcohol, which is very dangerous and a much unknown subject.
You see we’re not told how to use drugs either; we don’t have information available which we would have on an open market. As a consequence many youngsters that otherwise would be alive dies from mixing drugs or from doing bad drugs bought in a dark alley. Again, the law is at fault.
Most drugs are not worth the try, take my word for it. But if you feel the need to, cocaine may be worth it, but if so buy the good stuff, not the crappy shit normally available. If you want to stay away from them all, fine, that’s your choice, me I drink alcohol - each to his own.
Nibbling on pills
Time for some afternoon ranting.
I have never understood why so many people on this planet immediately reach for the cabinet filled with various pills as soon as the slightest pain or headache is present. Do deluded citizens really think that a pill is always the answer?
I’ve hardly ever eaten a painkiller. The only time I can remember is when I broke a couple of ribs in the military and so I felt it necessary to gulp down some morphine. Headache, stomach pain, the occasional sniffle or any other ailment I endure.
Pain isn’t dangerous, in fact feeling pain is often a good thing. It means that the body is working or that your immune system is strutting its stuff. And having a fever is normally your body reacting consequently not the actual disease, but rather the way your body is fighting it. So why try to get rid of it?
I’m no doctor and I might be completely wrong, but I’ve always felt that if your body isn’t allowed to work and fight on its own, your body will get weaker. That’s also one of the main reasons why I NEVER have taken any flu-shot. If a normal flu comes along that my body can’t handle my body is a weak one. I’m not stupid, if there happens to be an outbreak of something out of the norm I’ll obviously consider taking an injection, but normally why even bother?
There are some girls that do have terrible menstrual pains, there are those with diseases like cancer or any other sickness with deadly or very painful effect, so I sort of get that those people are nibbling on pills or running to the doctor, but that’s not what I’m talking about. I am talking about normal healthy humans that haven’t drank enough water or been in the sun too long and got a headache. I am talking about people that for every pain in the body take one or two pills.
What’s up with such idiots?
Never mind the possible negative bodily reaction, potential addiction or long term effects, what about the very notion of it? It comes back to my original thought; do deluded citizens really think that a pill is always the answer?
I have never understood why so many people on this planet immediately reach for the cabinet filled with various pills as soon as the slightest pain or headache is present. Do deluded citizens really think that a pill is always the answer?
I’ve hardly ever eaten a painkiller. The only time I can remember is when I broke a couple of ribs in the military and so I felt it necessary to gulp down some morphine. Headache, stomach pain, the occasional sniffle or any other ailment I endure.
Pain isn’t dangerous, in fact feeling pain is often a good thing. It means that the body is working or that your immune system is strutting its stuff. And having a fever is normally your body reacting consequently not the actual disease, but rather the way your body is fighting it. So why try to get rid of it?
I’m no doctor and I might be completely wrong, but I’ve always felt that if your body isn’t allowed to work and fight on its own, your body will get weaker. That’s also one of the main reasons why I NEVER have taken any flu-shot. If a normal flu comes along that my body can’t handle my body is a weak one. I’m not stupid, if there happens to be an outbreak of something out of the norm I’ll obviously consider taking an injection, but normally why even bother?
There are some girls that do have terrible menstrual pains, there are those with diseases like cancer or any other sickness with deadly or very painful effect, so I sort of get that those people are nibbling on pills or running to the doctor, but that’s not what I’m talking about. I am talking about normal healthy humans that haven’t drank enough water or been in the sun too long and got a headache. I am talking about people that for every pain in the body take one or two pills.
What’s up with such idiots?
Never mind the possible negative bodily reaction, potential addiction or long term effects, what about the very notion of it? It comes back to my original thought; do deluded citizens really think that a pill is always the answer?
Greek porn eases the mind
As most of us know by now Greece is in serious economic trouble. What better way to draw some bitter minds and bloody palms away from the calamities for a while then porn?
Julia Alexandratou is the name of the girl and she’s apparently pretty famous. I’ve never heard of her before but Alexandratou, 23, who is half-English, has done various model shoots as well as a number of music videos. The singer says it was made for private use, but when watching the flick (yes I have) it seem very professionally done.
Not only is the lady doing some pretty ‘nasty’ stuff including a ‘money-shot’ and some over the top moaning porno-style but it also seems that they have a cameraman around too. It could be an ordinary porno and is far more explicit and rangier than for example the Paris Hilton one.
I’m guessing this is more of a marketing stunt than anything else. Many idiots will be out buying her stuff, records, posters and such just for this, which is probably why the flick entered the market in the first place. As a professional marketer I say bravo to the lady.
After the meeting in Brussels with the 16 eurozone countries they’ve apparently reached an agreement on how they would help Greece (and consequently destroy the Euro) should it prove necessary. They should have encouraged more porno-watching instead, but we cannot have it all now can we...
Julia Alexandratou is the name of the girl and she’s apparently pretty famous. I’ve never heard of her before but Alexandratou, 23, who is half-English, has done various model shoots as well as a number of music videos. The singer says it was made for private use, but when watching the flick (yes I have) it seem very professionally done.
Not only is the lady doing some pretty ‘nasty’ stuff including a ‘money-shot’ and some over the top moaning porno-style but it also seems that they have a cameraman around too. It could be an ordinary porno and is far more explicit and rangier than for example the Paris Hilton one.
I’m guessing this is more of a marketing stunt than anything else. Many idiots will be out buying her stuff, records, posters and such just for this, which is probably why the flick entered the market in the first place. As a professional marketer I say bravo to the lady.
After the meeting in Brussels with the 16 eurozone countries they’ve apparently reached an agreement on how they would help Greece (and consequently destroy the Euro) should it prove necessary. They should have encouraged more porno-watching instead, but we cannot have it all now can we...
Julia Alexandratou
Contagious shootings
Apparently it is almost like a disease when talking about shootings. If one idiot is out threatening or actually do shot someone, several follows. So say some ‘expert’ in Swedish papers today since no less than 4 schools have been exposed to warnings about shooting sprees after the first one.
Of course it has nothing to do with bored or fed up youngsters. Unemployment, financial calamities, a government chasing after an entire generation for sharing information has nothing to do with it either. That drug tests will be imposed on minors without parents consent and, as far as I can tell, by restraints if necessary, is a completely different subject. Right?
Anyway, shootings only occur by gun-toting right-wing nutty and very fat Americas… and in rural Finland. Well Fins are crazy buggers, we all know that. Oh, and Germany on a couple of occasions, but that’s it. Well, France as well, and Russia, and Colombia, but nowhere else. I heard a rumor about Australia, a couple of African states and… but those are all lies.
It will never happen in Sweden though; we have strict gun-laws.
Oh, wait, did someone get shot yesterday? Noo, can’t be. And another shooting? No... It isn't true. And no-one even remember the gangs or that crazed Lieutenant knocking of 7 people in the middle of Sweden, so that never happened. Nope, nothing to see there.
Of course it has nothing to do with bored or fed up youngsters. Unemployment, financial calamities, a government chasing after an entire generation for sharing information has nothing to do with it either. That drug tests will be imposed on minors without parents consent and, as far as I can tell, by restraints if necessary, is a completely different subject. Right?
Anyway, shootings only occur by gun-toting right-wing nutty and very fat Americas… and in rural Finland. Well Fins are crazy buggers, we all know that. Oh, and Germany on a couple of occasions, but that’s it. Well, France as well, and Russia, and Colombia, but nowhere else. I heard a rumor about Australia, a couple of African states and… but those are all lies.
It will never happen in Sweden though; we have strict gun-laws.
Oh, wait, did someone get shot yesterday? Noo, can’t be. And another shooting? No... It isn't true. And no-one even remember the gangs or that crazed Lieutenant knocking of 7 people in the middle of Sweden, so that never happened. Nope, nothing to see there.
Monday, March 15, 2010
Lord Monckton warns of Climate Change Treaty resurrection in Bonn
Please distribute this widely - copy it as is - or change it as you see
fit, but please get the word out to as many people as possible.
Your freedom and democracy are in imminent peril
for a threat that doesn't exist.
Lord Monckton warns us of the impending Bonn Climate conference - another Copenhagen, but this time, probably more devious in its conception.
Video produced on March 13th, 2010.
Transcript:
This is Christopher Monckton.You have until the 9th of April to call your democratic representatives - Senators, MPs and MEPs (although we know Nigel Farage will be on top of it!). Don't wait! Do it now!
They're at it again.
The United Nations, having abjectly failed at Copenhagen in December of 2009 to impose upon the world a totally unnecessary, wickedly expensive, democracy-destroying world government treaty, it has now decided to hold an emergency meeting of states, party to the United Nations Framework Convention in Bonn and there, seven months before the next Cancun round, they're going to try to stitch together a deal to take democracy and freedom and prosperity away, worldwide, forever and, to make themselves very, very rich. And to make you who are watching this video, very, very poor.
Now why is this a bad idea?
First of all, government of the people, by the people, and for the people is a rare and precious thing. Very few countries around the world have it.
The United States in particular, has it, and has it very strongly. And if you carelessly transfer the powers of the government whom you elect to a world government that no-one will elect, and give that government supreme powers of taxation, of economic intervention, of environmental intervention, over the heads of your elected representatives in your country, then you will carelessly have thrown your democracy and your freedom away.
And you will have done so in the name of saving the planet from a threat which does not, in fact, exist.
So what are these representatives going to do?
They're going to meet and discuss how to take your freedom away.
What could you do about it?
You should telephone them. That's the way to do it best. That's what gets noticed.
Telephone your elected representative. If you're in the United States, you telephone your senators; there are two of them for each state.
Telephone them, in Washington. Try to speak to the Senator himself, or to a senior staffer. Do not be fobbed off with a secretary, or an intern, or receptionist, or telephonist.
Get throught to a staffer or to a senator - say there is no need for any climate treaty, and you, in the Senate, must understand that and must not pass any climate treaty.
Get on that telephone.
OK, you may have done it before. You may have done it just before the Copenhagen debacle.
Why did Copenhagen fail?
Because so many millions of you did ring your senators, and several of them got in touch with your President, and your President realised that the treaty draft that would have set up a world government would not pass.
And so, that treaty draft was very quietly dropped for a time; but now they're back. They're trying again. They will try in Bonn. They will try in Cancun. They will try next year in South Africa.
And if they haven't succeeded by then, they will try at Rio in 2012, the 20th anniversary of the Earth Summit that started all of this nonsense.
But every step of the way, and on every occasion, you must telephone, telphone your senator and say "this treaty shall not pass".
Do it now, because it's your democracy.
Use it or lose it.
Bonn UNFCCC timetable
Cancun UNFCCC date and the calendar of further meetings
Hat tip: Freedom-2-Choose and CFACT
Reuters' coverage (Hat tip: Banned)
Cross-posted
A lurking inflation bomb
Since I don’t really like graphs I usually ignore those, but sometimes they are good in combination with good information.
So head over to Save Capitalism and check his post out. After that come back and check out these vids and then tell me how good things look. Seen any ‘green shoots’ lately?
So head over to Save Capitalism and check his post out. After that come back and check out these vids and then tell me how good things look. Seen any ‘green shoots’ lately?
The economic crisis continues
Well, with a short intermission into gun-control, fascist governance and shooting sprees I find it kind of relaxing going back to what I know best and to the the reason this blogs really exist, namely our current financial dilemma.
It isn’t just Greece going over the cliff, the Baltic States, Iceland and many others are hanging on by a thread.
Spain is maybe the next funny thing, or maybe it will be Portugal, or Italy. Hard to tell really. What we do know however is that Germany is getting a lot of heat from other countries in the Euro-zone because apparently they are doing too well and don’t have as high pay increases as the others. This is a problem since the European Central bank (ECB) cannot heighten or tighten the screws to fit everyone so many feel that Germany should be less responsible so the ECB can ‘help’ everyone.
Meanwhile, in the real world, Greece haven’t really begun doing the right thing yet and already have riots so it isn’t surprising that the Finance ministers from eurozone states will today attempt to paper over cracks and try to reach agreement on a €20bn-€25bn aid package to help ease the financial crisis in Greece.
I hope they do it. I truly mean that. Bail out the suckers and then watch the rest of the PIGS (and after that all of them) beg for financial aid. As I’ve said before, if they decide to bail out the messed-up idiocy that is Greece, that will be the beginning of the end of the Euro, so I welcome it. Do it.
It isn’t just Greece going over the cliff, the Baltic States, Iceland and many others are hanging on by a thread.
Spain is maybe the next funny thing, or maybe it will be Portugal, or Italy. Hard to tell really. What we do know however is that Germany is getting a lot of heat from other countries in the Euro-zone because apparently they are doing too well and don’t have as high pay increases as the others. This is a problem since the European Central bank (ECB) cannot heighten or tighten the screws to fit everyone so many feel that Germany should be less responsible so the ECB can ‘help’ everyone.
Meanwhile, in the real world, Greece haven’t really begun doing the right thing yet and already have riots so it isn’t surprising that the Finance ministers from eurozone states will today attempt to paper over cracks and try to reach agreement on a €20bn-€25bn aid package to help ease the financial crisis in Greece.
I hope they do it. I truly mean that. Bail out the suckers and then watch the rest of the PIGS (and after that all of them) beg for financial aid. As I’ve said before, if they decide to bail out the messed-up idiocy that is Greece, that will be the beginning of the end of the Euro, so I welcome it. Do it.
’Gun free’ Sweden II
Yet another school in Sweden has apparently received threats about some shooting spree, probably a prank, but still. And as if that isn’t funny enough we also learn that a gang trying to rob a depot shot at least 35 rounds at the police and is now standing trial. This in a country were shootings never occur…
It is only a matter of time before someone goes apeshit again (has happened before, also in Sweden) and starts shooting people. And when it does, ask yourself the following question: would you rather have all around you unarmed and helpless or would you like them to be armed and able to shoot back at any maniac?
There are no superman’s you know, and Godzilla is mostly Tokyo-based, so he's probably a no-show. So who is going to protect you? The police? Well, they will show up and mostly do a good job. The problem is that their job in such a situation is to pick up body parts and interview dying witnesses.
We all know what the Government says; they don’t want people to defend themselves. How would that look? Cannot have self-reliant humans without fear out there, wouldn’t serve politicians purpose now would it?
It is only a matter of time before someone goes apeshit again (has happened before, also in Sweden) and starts shooting people. And when it does, ask yourself the following question: would you rather have all around you unarmed and helpless or would you like them to be armed and able to shoot back at any maniac?
There are no superman’s you know, and Godzilla is mostly Tokyo-based, so he's probably a no-show. So who is going to protect you? The police? Well, they will show up and mostly do a good job. The problem is that their job in such a situation is to pick up body parts and interview dying witnesses.
We all know what the Government says; they don’t want people to defend themselves. How would that look? Cannot have self-reliant humans without fear out there, wouldn’t serve politicians purpose now would it?
Something is rotten in the state of Sweden
The Swedish government has ignored the advice of Sweden's Council on Legislation and proposed the introduction of drug tests on children below the age of 15. The government's legislative proposal also provides for the tests to be conducted without the consent of the children's parents.
Beatrice Ask, Sweden's Justice Mentalist and pretty spry for a Fascist, rejected claims about that the police and any authority could use this legislation as punishment arguing that the police have better things to do than to harass youngsters. Yeah… sure, what universe does this creepy lady live in?
The invasion of privacy and the governments apparent notion that kids belongs to the state is completely in the same folder as how Sweden used to practice forced sterilization of women deemed unfit to be mothers until as recently as 1975. Branded low class, or mentally slow, they were kept in Institutes for Misled and Morally Neglected Children, where they were eventually “treated”. In 1997, the government admitted that 60,000 women had been sterilised.
It seems that the government always goes after the week doesn’t it? Poor underprivileged handicapped women, kids, unarmed citizens, youngsters downloading porn and grandmas googleing for Hitler. They are all fair game.
Sweden’s current government is surely one of the worst in recorded history. A supposed “right-center” coalition of fascists. Someone may argue they have been better then the social Democrats since they’ve lowered a couple of taxes and allowed us to buy non-prescription drugs at the supermarket (Whopdido...), but that’s just semantics, hardly even that.
During the watch of these lowlife amoebas the worst control grid even seen outside literature has been imposed. No-one can even spit anymore without the government and their internet thugs knowing about it. They’ve increased several key-taxes said to control our eating, smoking and working habits and they have continued on the righteous path of madness comes to the manmade global warming scam. Economic bubbles have been created and inflation is growing as well as unemployment.
And now this. Our kids are theirs to poke with needles, draw blood from, take urine from and screw around with however they please.
I don’t know about the rest of you folks, but I am glad I don’t have kids right now because of the police or any authority snatched up my kid and stuck a needle in him/her or forced them to leave a urine sample I would kill every last one of them.
No, I am not kidding. I would shoot, chop, stab and beat the crap out of anyone doing that to my child. I hope some of you out there feel the same because if you don’t love your children enough to protect them this world truly is fucked.
Beatrice Ask, Sweden's Justice Mentalist and pretty spry for a Fascist, rejected claims about that the police and any authority could use this legislation as punishment arguing that the police have better things to do than to harass youngsters. Yeah… sure, what universe does this creepy lady live in?
The invasion of privacy and the governments apparent notion that kids belongs to the state is completely in the same folder as how Sweden used to practice forced sterilization of women deemed unfit to be mothers until as recently as 1975. Branded low class, or mentally slow, they were kept in Institutes for Misled and Morally Neglected Children, where they were eventually “treated”. In 1997, the government admitted that 60,000 women had been sterilised.
It seems that the government always goes after the week doesn’t it? Poor underprivileged handicapped women, kids, unarmed citizens, youngsters downloading porn and grandmas googleing for Hitler. They are all fair game.
Sweden’s current government is surely one of the worst in recorded history. A supposed “right-center” coalition of fascists. Someone may argue they have been better then the social Democrats since they’ve lowered a couple of taxes and allowed us to buy non-prescription drugs at the supermarket (Whopdido...), but that’s just semantics, hardly even that.
During the watch of these lowlife amoebas the worst control grid even seen outside literature has been imposed. No-one can even spit anymore without the government and their internet thugs knowing about it. They’ve increased several key-taxes said to control our eating, smoking and working habits and they have continued on the righteous path of madness comes to the manmade global warming scam. Economic bubbles have been created and inflation is growing as well as unemployment.
And now this. Our kids are theirs to poke with needles, draw blood from, take urine from and screw around with however they please.
I don’t know about the rest of you folks, but I am glad I don’t have kids right now because of the police or any authority snatched up my kid and stuck a needle in him/her or forced them to leave a urine sample I would kill every last one of them.
No, I am not kidding. I would shoot, chop, stab and beat the crap out of anyone doing that to my child. I hope some of you out there feel the same because if you don’t love your children enough to protect them this world truly is fucked.
Sunday, March 14, 2010
’Gun free’ Sweden
Usually when shooting occurs in far away countries like Finland, Germany or the US, Swedish newspapers are filled with warnings about how dangerous it is to allow people to own guns. The very presence of weapons is, according to Swedish journalists, the same as murder.
Despite that you can hardly pick up a paper anymore without reading about someone in Sweden that has got shot. Often it is argued that it is an internal dispute by criminal organizations, and while that may be true to a large degree, it is not always the case.
Yesterday was no exception.
In southern Sweden in the City of Malmö shots was fired at the main police station. Police immediately cordoned off the building. The police suspect that the shot was fired with a low caliber weapon from a distance.
Probably a lone gunman with roots in some African or Muslim country, don’t you think? Because it is not normal for any Swede to hold a grudge against the police so it hast to be some immigrant… Probably mad too, psychotic really, ohoh and on pills, probably didn’t know what he was doing.
Around the same time a man, that since then has been arrested, threatening with a student massacre at the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) in Stockholm. In making the threats on an internet forum, the anonymous person stated that they would take a gun to the institute on Monday and shoot as many as possible.
But those sorts of thing can never happen in Sweden were all is fine and no-one have guns. Right?
Well lots of hunters do own guns in Sweden and there are military installations everywhere pretty much open to pick whatever you want from. Not really big on security within the Swedish military. And smuggled in guns from the Baltic States and Russia are very common. Any decent criminal in Sweden owns several guns, which of course is to a large degree ignored by media as well as the powers that be.
The common man, however, is a walking around as an open for all buffet for anyone wanting to rape, murder, mug or bully around. The normal Swedish populace is helplessly unarmed and anyone dumb enough to defend himself will go to jail, most likely far longer than any rapist.
You see, self-defense is illegal in Sweden, guns too. But don’t you worry, there will never be any massacre or shooting in Sweden. Noooo, never gonna happen… So we don’t need armed citizens able to defend themselves because in Sweden we have magical unicorns floating around on pink fluffy clouds and pixies always show up to save the day.
Despite that you can hardly pick up a paper anymore without reading about someone in Sweden that has got shot. Often it is argued that it is an internal dispute by criminal organizations, and while that may be true to a large degree, it is not always the case.
Yesterday was no exception.
In southern Sweden in the City of Malmö shots was fired at the main police station. Police immediately cordoned off the building. The police suspect that the shot was fired with a low caliber weapon from a distance.
Probably a lone gunman with roots in some African or Muslim country, don’t you think? Because it is not normal for any Swede to hold a grudge against the police so it hast to be some immigrant… Probably mad too, psychotic really, ohoh and on pills, probably didn’t know what he was doing.
Around the same time a man, that since then has been arrested, threatening with a student massacre at the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) in Stockholm. In making the threats on an internet forum, the anonymous person stated that they would take a gun to the institute on Monday and shoot as many as possible.
But those sorts of thing can never happen in Sweden were all is fine and no-one have guns. Right?
Well lots of hunters do own guns in Sweden and there are military installations everywhere pretty much open to pick whatever you want from. Not really big on security within the Swedish military. And smuggled in guns from the Baltic States and Russia are very common. Any decent criminal in Sweden owns several guns, which of course is to a large degree ignored by media as well as the powers that be.
The common man, however, is a walking around as an open for all buffet for anyone wanting to rape, murder, mug or bully around. The normal Swedish populace is helplessly unarmed and anyone dumb enough to defend himself will go to jail, most likely far longer than any rapist.
You see, self-defense is illegal in Sweden, guns too. But don’t you worry, there will never be any massacre or shooting in Sweden. Noooo, never gonna happen… So we don’t need armed citizens able to defend themselves because in Sweden we have magical unicorns floating around on pink fluffy clouds and pixies always show up to save the day.
New York Salty goodness goes bye-bye?
Do I even need to comment on this?
MYFOXNY.COM - Some New York City chefs and restaurant owners are taking aim at a bill introduced in the New York Legislature that, if passed, would ban the use of salt in restaurant cooking.
"No owner or operator of a restaurant in this state shall use salt in any form in the preparation of any food for consumption by customers of such restaurant, including food prepared to be consumed on the premises of such restaurant or off of such premises," the bill, A. 10129 , states in part.
The legislation, which Assemblyman Felix Ortiz , D-Brooklyn, introduced on March 5, would fine restaurants $1,000 for each violation.
(...)
MYFOXNY.COM - Some New York City chefs and restaurant owners are taking aim at a bill introduced in the New York Legislature that, if passed, would ban the use of salt in restaurant cooking.
"No owner or operator of a restaurant in this state shall use salt in any form in the preparation of any food for consumption by customers of such restaurant, including food prepared to be consumed on the premises of such restaurant or off of such premises," the bill, A. 10129 , states in part.
The legislation, which Assemblyman Felix Ortiz , D-Brooklyn, introduced on March 5, would fine restaurants $1,000 for each violation.
(...)
Taking a turgid shaft up the pooper Spanish style
Saturday, March 13, 2010
The scary population control lobby
One argument that’s getting increasingly popular among environment Nazis is that the Earth is overpopulated, and that we need to control the population so our number doesn’t grow too fast.
Such a faulty claim seems awfully close to eugenics and is one of the scariest and most horrific thoughts out there. Worse still is it that this malevolent idea seems to be gaining momentum among powerful lobby organizations and among elitist groups of politics and science.
It’s worth asking what drives the population control and population reduction lobby. These people have been around for a few centuries and their arguments have changed over time. For one of the first population scaremongers, Thomas Malthus in the 18th century, the main problem was that if too many people were born, there wouldn’t be enough food. He vastly underestimated the ability of industrialized society to create more food.
In the early 20th century, population reduction arguments took on a racial and eugenic streak. Some claimed there were too many Africans and Asians, who might weaken the power of white European nations. More recently, the population control lobby has adopted the environmentalist’s arguments: Too many people are demanding too much of Mother Earth. Since the manmade global warming scam is getting more and more exposed for the fraud it is, this population control thingy seem to becoming the new chilling idea they want to sell to the public.
It always haft to be something. A reduction of the ozone layer will kill us all, we’re heading for a new ice-age, the millennium Y2K would destroy our way of life, cosmic rays will murder all of us, or global warming is about to knock off all Polar Bears. The scary scenarios never stop coming but such doomsday sayers are after your valet and wants to control your life. It has nothing to do with reality.
The argument frequently made by these Malthusians population control freaks is that there’s a fixed, finite amount of resources on this ball of gas and water we call Earth, and that if the human population reaches a certain number, those resources will be all used up. This is a deeply disingenuous depiction of what a resource is. There is little fixed about resources. The question of what is and isn’t a resource changes over time, depending on the level of development reached by any particular society.
The number of times the science community has argued that coal and oil will be finished a decade or two ahead is numerous. I remember that back in the 80’s it was popular to say that carbon-based fuel and energy would be nearing its end about now since the resources are scarce. It was not true then, and it is not true now.
It’s not true that the Earth is overpopulated, as you’ll hear Malthusians argue. Humans inhabit only tiny parts of this planet. Take Britain as an example. Lots of people describe Britain as overcrowded. In fact, only about seven to eight percent of Britain is “settled.” (By comparison, 46 percent of British land is used for agriculture and 11 or 12 percent of it is woodland.) Britain has plenty of space for more people. This planet isn’t remotely overcrowded.
An area the size of Iceland would give each of the 6.5 billion humans 185 square feet to themselves.
So seen to living space this planet can sustain 600-700 billion people, no problem.
But what about food? Only looking at the agricultural areas today used and if we used modern appliances and technology there’s no problem whatsoever to feed every person on this planet many times over. In fact, if we adopted a libertarian view on governance hunger would be no more and we could double or even triple our current population size and still feed everyone. And this today, with the know-how and technology we have at our disposal at this very moment and with the land used for crops today. Just think what we can do tomorrow.
Also, if we use gen-manipulation and start to grow crops in places we today don’t use there shouldn’t be any problem feeding a 100 billion people. And again, this is today, with today’s level of technology.
With this in mind I find it hilarious that people are starving by the millions and that tens of millions are on the brink of starvation in Africa. It shouldn’t be that way, but statism, fascist rulers and socialist organizations have seen to it that people are dying, completely unnecessary.
Speaking of 'hilarious'... Just imagine If these people got their way...
So what really drives the population control outlook? I’d say that what’s finite isn’t resources, but the Malthusians’ faith in humanity. It’s that which is running out and drying up. For them, a human being is never anything more than “another mouth to feed.” Yet humans aren’t simply the burping, biological users of resources; they’re the discoverers of resources, the creators of resources, the makers of communities, cities, history. A human being isn’t only a mouth that must be filled but a brain that can think and a pair of hands that can work.
But there are two other reasons for population control. Firstly population control is one of the biggest ways of keeping you under their thumb. If they control how many sperms that reach eggs each year, then they control pretty much everything about us. Secondly if we believe that resources are scarce and there’s too many of us, they can use this as an argument for why people are poor and starving. It is not the power- and wealth accumulation in the hands of the few that’s at fault, oh no, you people out there are too many…
I am guessing I’m not the only one that has noticed the increase in these sorts of argument? And believe me they will grow over time. This is most likely the next scare coming our way, and they will use mother Earth as their battering-ram.
Luckily for the environment Nazis and our elitist friends they have managed to create an financial calamity of unprecedented size and when our economies goes down the crapper so will poverty sky-rocket. Those tens of millions on the brink in Africa are most likely about to die, and perhaps they will also get a couple of more wars on the planet. The US killing millions of Muslims isn’t near enough the levels needed in the Malthusian mind.
Such a faulty claim seems awfully close to eugenics and is one of the scariest and most horrific thoughts out there. Worse still is it that this malevolent idea seems to be gaining momentum among powerful lobby organizations and among elitist groups of politics and science.
It’s worth asking what drives the population control and population reduction lobby. These people have been around for a few centuries and their arguments have changed over time. For one of the first population scaremongers, Thomas Malthus in the 18th century, the main problem was that if too many people were born, there wouldn’t be enough food. He vastly underestimated the ability of industrialized society to create more food.
In the early 20th century, population reduction arguments took on a racial and eugenic streak. Some claimed there were too many Africans and Asians, who might weaken the power of white European nations. More recently, the population control lobby has adopted the environmentalist’s arguments: Too many people are demanding too much of Mother Earth. Since the manmade global warming scam is getting more and more exposed for the fraud it is, this population control thingy seem to becoming the new chilling idea they want to sell to the public.
The argument frequently made by these Malthusians population control freaks is that there’s a fixed, finite amount of resources on this ball of gas and water we call Earth, and that if the human population reaches a certain number, those resources will be all used up. This is a deeply disingenuous depiction of what a resource is. There is little fixed about resources. The question of what is and isn’t a resource changes over time, depending on the level of development reached by any particular society.
The number of times the science community has argued that coal and oil will be finished a decade or two ahead is numerous. I remember that back in the 80’s it was popular to say that carbon-based fuel and energy would be nearing its end about now since the resources are scarce. It was not true then, and it is not true now.
It’s not true that the Earth is overpopulated, as you’ll hear Malthusians argue. Humans inhabit only tiny parts of this planet. Take Britain as an example. Lots of people describe Britain as overcrowded. In fact, only about seven to eight percent of Britain is “settled.” (By comparison, 46 percent of British land is used for agriculture and 11 or 12 percent of it is woodland.) Britain has plenty of space for more people. This planet isn’t remotely overcrowded.
An area the size of Iceland would give each of the 6.5 billion humans 185 square feet to themselves.
So seen to living space this planet can sustain 600-700 billion people, no problem.
But what about food? Only looking at the agricultural areas today used and if we used modern appliances and technology there’s no problem whatsoever to feed every person on this planet many times over. In fact, if we adopted a libertarian view on governance hunger would be no more and we could double or even triple our current population size and still feed everyone. And this today, with the know-how and technology we have at our disposal at this very moment and with the land used for crops today. Just think what we can do tomorrow.
Also, if we use gen-manipulation and start to grow crops in places we today don’t use there shouldn’t be any problem feeding a 100 billion people. And again, this is today, with today’s level of technology.
With this in mind I find it hilarious that people are starving by the millions and that tens of millions are on the brink of starvation in Africa. It shouldn’t be that way, but statism, fascist rulers and socialist organizations have seen to it that people are dying, completely unnecessary.
Speaking of 'hilarious'... Just imagine If these people got their way...
So what really drives the population control outlook? I’d say that what’s finite isn’t resources, but the Malthusians’ faith in humanity. It’s that which is running out and drying up. For them, a human being is never anything more than “another mouth to feed.” Yet humans aren’t simply the burping, biological users of resources; they’re the discoverers of resources, the creators of resources, the makers of communities, cities, history. A human being isn’t only a mouth that must be filled but a brain that can think and a pair of hands that can work.
But there are two other reasons for population control. Firstly population control is one of the biggest ways of keeping you under their thumb. If they control how many sperms that reach eggs each year, then they control pretty much everything about us. Secondly if we believe that resources are scarce and there’s too many of us, they can use this as an argument for why people are poor and starving. It is not the power- and wealth accumulation in the hands of the few that’s at fault, oh no, you people out there are too many…
I am guessing I’m not the only one that has noticed the increase in these sorts of argument? And believe me they will grow over time. This is most likely the next scare coming our way, and they will use mother Earth as their battering-ram.
Luckily for the environment Nazis and our elitist friends they have managed to create an financial calamity of unprecedented size and when our economies goes down the crapper so will poverty sky-rocket. Those tens of millions on the brink in Africa are most likely about to die, and perhaps they will also get a couple of more wars on the planet. The US killing millions of Muslims isn’t near enough the levels needed in the Malthusian mind.
Eurovision Again
The Swedish Eurovision final had its highs and lows. The contributions were probably better than last year and most of the performers are of good standard. The show is on a high level throughout (except for the ‘rock’ idiots towards the end...). The Swedish/Norwegian mix-up was also a good showcase. With the exceptions for some sleazy male ballad singers there’s not much to complain about…
But the voting process… oh my lord Beelzebub… Letting our future competitors vote!? WTF! And the so called “experts”… Idiots.
The winning contribution, ‘This is my life’ by Anna Bergendahl isn’t a real winner. Although I like the girl, loveable really, the song doesn’t have the ‘humph’ needed to win European hearts. Not good enough for a Swedish contribution I would say. I’m guessing on a 14th position in the final, and then I am in a positive mood.
It would have been better if the ladies of Timotej had won. They sang a great little catchy tune named “kom” which with my loosely translation means “Come here”, and they are four semi-sexy blondish women, 30 points extra for that alone. Although their performance can get a lot better. Maybe a change of wardrobe as well… But looking at YouTube the different postings have together by far exceeded 120 000 views, and that’s a high number on a new song by an unknown group. I’m guessing they are already gaining fans, so it is a shame they didn’t win.
Well, this is my choice:
And then the winner:
Just for that we need a great song to finish this post. This is the Serbian song and Winner performed by Marija Serifovic on Eurovision Song Contest in Helsinki – 2007. Without a doubt one of the best winners and songs ever performed in this contest. I don’t understand a word, but the power of this translates over any barrier. Fantastic.
But the voting process… oh my lord Beelzebub… Letting our future competitors vote!? WTF! And the so called “experts”… Idiots.
The winning contribution, ‘This is my life’ by Anna Bergendahl isn’t a real winner. Although I like the girl, loveable really, the song doesn’t have the ‘humph’ needed to win European hearts. Not good enough for a Swedish contribution I would say. I’m guessing on a 14th position in the final, and then I am in a positive mood.
It would have been better if the ladies of Timotej had won. They sang a great little catchy tune named “kom” which with my loosely translation means “Come here”, and they are four semi-sexy blondish women, 30 points extra for that alone. Although their performance can get a lot better. Maybe a change of wardrobe as well… But looking at YouTube the different postings have together by far exceeded 120 000 views, and that’s a high number on a new song by an unknown group. I’m guessing they are already gaining fans, so it is a shame they didn’t win.
Well, this is my choice:
And then the winner:
Just for that we need a great song to finish this post. This is the Serbian song and Winner performed by Marija Serifovic on Eurovision Song Contest in Helsinki – 2007. Without a doubt one of the best winners and songs ever performed in this contest. I don’t understand a word, but the power of this translates over any barrier. Fantastic.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)