Again a survey has revealed that the “racists” are gaining momentum in Sweden. The party SverigeDemokraterna (SD) or Swedish Democrats in English have now gone past a couple of the fascist parties in our current government according to the latest poll. A shaking experience for current MPs now risking to lose their seat.
And again mainstream media and the established parties are scratching themselves pondering how a party they drum out to be ‘racists’ can gain voters. A party that to a large extent is frozen out from general debates, has very little money and has a hard time finding office space shouldn’t be able to attract sympathizes. Oh, and the righteous elitists have done and continue to do everything they can to label these horrid foes with the most vile epithets imaginable. Still SD keeps climbing the polls and the established parties seems to have no countermeasure other than continue the bashing.
Why don’t they get it? I’ve figured this out a long time ago. It doesn’t matter if you take the marketing aspect of being the underdog, bullied and oppressed or if you apply the SD “racists” arguments that actually do have some valid points in the life of ordinary citizens, the outcome is the same. SD will gain voters.
The elitists have done nothing to tackle the problems that, today, come with immigration and refugees. So if someone offers a different approach and solution, why shouldn’t people be interested? And when you talk to people that exists in our time and space which is far, far away from the world of politics, you soon realize that most citizens are bloody tired of the political correctness that oozes out from parliament. When did it become “racist” to wave the flag? When was the vote on banning church on graduation? Why can’t we be proud of being Swedish, English, American or whatever? Why can’t we celebrate our old traditions or sing the songs of our ancestors?
And people are also evil, all of us are. Maybe with the exception for a black, unemployed handicapped single woman with 3 children, but otherwise, all of us.
The evildoers are everywhere. They drink too much or drink stuff that is illegal. They do drugs, drive too fast, they drive without a seatbelt and they are horrible enough to lit a cigarette now and again. The evil people are also display adequate sinfulness when they ride bikes without a helmet, download a movie or utter stupidities like “equality” or “justice”. The evil people take jobs at pre-schools despite having reached adulthood and consequently being pedophiles. They are everywhere these evil ones. They don’t pay enough taxes and sometimes they even complain over too many regulations. They spit on the street, they walk against red light, they are having barbeques without permission, and they paint their houses in the wrong color or build too close to the water. Malevolence citizens may watch the wrong shows, listen to the wrong message or just be pigheaded enough to not listen to reason. But the evilness doesn’t stop with just evil, people also don’t understand how evil they are and so consequently the government needs to tell them this by labels, laws and information campaigns.
You understand this, all of you do, that you’re evil. So along comes an evil party the elitists don’t want us to vote for… oh, such a surprise that people do it anyway… Don’t you think?
Most people don’t care what color or religion their neighbor has, but they do care if that person has a job or not, and they do care whether or not a newcomer display willingness to adjust to laws and the surroundings.
The elitists have made sure that immigrants and refugees have a very hard time finding jobs, and politicians try their very best in pushing such individuals out to rundown projects and trashy suburbs. The elitists also make sure that there are exceptions in the law or that any poor defenseless newcomer get all the welfare he want and then some. The politically correct righteous elitists have also made sure that it’s mostly us evil ones that needs to adjust to new religions, new cultures and whatnot. And damn anyone evil enough to point out that a faceless woman covered in some Klu Klux Klan sheet sitting behind the cash-register is a bad thing.
The powers that be have created this mess, in affect invited racists ideas and parties in. They would have done less for SD’s cause if they paid for SD neon-signs and big ads in the paper. And since there is very little difference between any of the parties, including SD, why not?
There is not a chance in hell for me voting for SD, they are too racist, too socialist, too much as all the rest. But for the rest of you evildoers out there, why not?
Saturday, November 14, 2009
Creating criminals the righteous way
I was checking around for some good porn and as usual I started to roam my favorite sites. All of a sudden I stumbled upon a site blocked by my isp and/or the police claiming it contains kiddy porn. That site wasn’t blocked before and it didn’t take me more than seconds to encounter a couple of more sites blocked for the same reason. The censorship kind of bugs me, not because I like naked preteens but rather that someone else have decided what I can and cannot watch. Maybe those sites did contain some questionable stuff, but I doubt it.
How do they decide what is kiddy porn or not? Does it take one single picture of a girl with a shaved cunt and small breasts to render such a blockage? Someone may argue that it’s mostly self-evidentiary, and maybe it is to some degree, but to keep track of all the millions of porno sites is an impossible task so they haft to act on suspicion rather than take the time to investigate a picture or vid before issuing a filter. Consequently sites will be blocked without being guilty or getting to defend themselves.
Even I with my limited computer knowledge know how to avoid filters or look behind the curtain if needed and if one site gets blocked, two new ones pop up. So such filters or blockage are only temporally at best. In other words the whole thing is highly stupid. In a way our great leaders knows this and consequently they feel the need to be able to penetrate into everything searching for key-words, certain names and so on in feeble attempts to catch one or two casual collectors of dubious stuff.
Anyone with the slightest inkling also understands that real pedophiles avoid public domains as much as possible. They have their own little hard to get into clubs. And so the only ones getting tracked or caught are the occasional watcher or the one that happens to download something that may contain something suspect. With the emerging of the latest legislations the righteous seemingly are saying that pretty much everyone are pedophiles, and so they do have created a perfect excuse for surveillance.
In essence; the more laws, the more criminals. More laws render more people getting caught so, in the eyes of our enemies; the more a law seem to be working i.e. more getting busted - more laws automatically becomes a “good” thing. In the meanwhile the initial offenders, the rapists, can continue at the same rate as before but now actually more protected since police spend more of their time catching made-up criminals that may or may not have a couple of pictures of a naked girl that may or may not be underage. Yes, they can get hold on one or two really horrible people, but mostly the monitoring will only catch more people if they impose more laws. And since police as well as the justice system needs to show results, and since politicians need to prove how valuable their conjured up laws are it all leads to an escalating situation.
This is what most people out there don’t realize; that some child porn laws that do come with good intentions in reality leads to more resources being diverted from the real criminals to the occasional, and mostly unintentional, offender of questionable material. It also leads to even more hidden societies of shady characters that get even harder to get to. All the while new sites pop up faster than anyone can close them down so the lawmaker is always at least two steps behind.
Again, this cannot be said enough times, the monitoring will only catch more people if they impose more laws.
So the thing I want you to understand here is that a new law means we get more criminals and the government will, but only temporarily, catch more “criminals”. It takes a certain time for people to see, understand and circle around a law, but eventually it happens so the number of “criminals” getting caught goes down and that does not look good for the police. You might argue that the police would regard that as a good thing, but then you don’t understand. The number of “criminals” is still the same, but less gets caught because they have learned how to avoid the law. Consequently we need additional legislation and maybe even a new department handling certain issues. How often don’t we hear that we need more laws to protect the young, animals or whatnot?
Another example of the same phenomenon is how the police handle speeding and traffic violations. Is there anyone out there that has ever seen a regular police control in the centre of town? I haven’t, not in any country. Ever seen one by a school? A majority of all accidents happens in highly populated areas, but where do we find police control stations? Highways. If you are driving on a 3-lane highway on a beautiful summer’s day you can find a police control after a stretch of downhill.
Most people actually obey the speeding limit when driving by a school, but almost no one follow the same when going downhill on a highway on a perfect road on a summer’s day. The police know this and consequently they fill their quota fastest on a highway. Instead of going after the really insane idiots driving as crazies the police spend their time catching soccer mums going 2mph too fast.
And the number of laws in regards to traffic comes in unlimited supplies. Seatbelts while driving, you cannot talk on the phone while driving, you need lights on even during the day, you need insurance papers, driving license. Any markings need to be correct, the cargo secured in a certain way, your vehicle cannot weigh more than a certain weight, you can only have a certain amount of passengers, and God help you if the license-plate isn’t visible enough for the controllers to see. Eating liqueur-candy or having a light beer to dinner isn’t even an option because they may get you for drunk driving.
The only limit for how many and how intrusive laws can be is our own imagination or, as in the eyes of the righteous, how evil people are. And for those that rule us and for the police it is, as said, important to show result. If they imposed a law that didn’t create any criminals, it would be a useless law.
The first reason for any law is to create criminals. The second reason for any law is to show how fantastic the government and the police are. Far down the list comes protection that is the main selling-argument.
How do they decide what is kiddy porn or not? Does it take one single picture of a girl with a shaved cunt and small breasts to render such a blockage? Someone may argue that it’s mostly self-evidentiary, and maybe it is to some degree, but to keep track of all the millions of porno sites is an impossible task so they haft to act on suspicion rather than take the time to investigate a picture or vid before issuing a filter. Consequently sites will be blocked without being guilty or getting to defend themselves.
Even I with my limited computer knowledge know how to avoid filters or look behind the curtain if needed and if one site gets blocked, two new ones pop up. So such filters or blockage are only temporally at best. In other words the whole thing is highly stupid. In a way our great leaders knows this and consequently they feel the need to be able to penetrate into everything searching for key-words, certain names and so on in feeble attempts to catch one or two casual collectors of dubious stuff.
Anyone with the slightest inkling also understands that real pedophiles avoid public domains as much as possible. They have their own little hard to get into clubs. And so the only ones getting tracked or caught are the occasional watcher or the one that happens to download something that may contain something suspect. With the emerging of the latest legislations the righteous seemingly are saying that pretty much everyone are pedophiles, and so they do have created a perfect excuse for surveillance.
In essence; the more laws, the more criminals. More laws render more people getting caught so, in the eyes of our enemies; the more a law seem to be working i.e. more getting busted - more laws automatically becomes a “good” thing. In the meanwhile the initial offenders, the rapists, can continue at the same rate as before but now actually more protected since police spend more of their time catching made-up criminals that may or may not have a couple of pictures of a naked girl that may or may not be underage. Yes, they can get hold on one or two really horrible people, but mostly the monitoring will only catch more people if they impose more laws. And since police as well as the justice system needs to show results, and since politicians need to prove how valuable their conjured up laws are it all leads to an escalating situation.
This is what most people out there don’t realize; that some child porn laws that do come with good intentions in reality leads to more resources being diverted from the real criminals to the occasional, and mostly unintentional, offender of questionable material. It also leads to even more hidden societies of shady characters that get even harder to get to. All the while new sites pop up faster than anyone can close them down so the lawmaker is always at least two steps behind.
Again, this cannot be said enough times, the monitoring will only catch more people if they impose more laws.
So the thing I want you to understand here is that a new law means we get more criminals and the government will, but only temporarily, catch more “criminals”. It takes a certain time for people to see, understand and circle around a law, but eventually it happens so the number of “criminals” getting caught goes down and that does not look good for the police. You might argue that the police would regard that as a good thing, but then you don’t understand. The number of “criminals” is still the same, but less gets caught because they have learned how to avoid the law. Consequently we need additional legislation and maybe even a new department handling certain issues. How often don’t we hear that we need more laws to protect the young, animals or whatnot?
Another example of the same phenomenon is how the police handle speeding and traffic violations. Is there anyone out there that has ever seen a regular police control in the centre of town? I haven’t, not in any country. Ever seen one by a school? A majority of all accidents happens in highly populated areas, but where do we find police control stations? Highways. If you are driving on a 3-lane highway on a beautiful summer’s day you can find a police control after a stretch of downhill.
Most people actually obey the speeding limit when driving by a school, but almost no one follow the same when going downhill on a highway on a perfect road on a summer’s day. The police know this and consequently they fill their quota fastest on a highway. Instead of going after the really insane idiots driving as crazies the police spend their time catching soccer mums going 2mph too fast.
And the number of laws in regards to traffic comes in unlimited supplies. Seatbelts while driving, you cannot talk on the phone while driving, you need lights on even during the day, you need insurance papers, driving license. Any markings need to be correct, the cargo secured in a certain way, your vehicle cannot weigh more than a certain weight, you can only have a certain amount of passengers, and God help you if the license-plate isn’t visible enough for the controllers to see. Eating liqueur-candy or having a light beer to dinner isn’t even an option because they may get you for drunk driving.
The only limit for how many and how intrusive laws can be is our own imagination or, as in the eyes of the righteous, how evil people are. And for those that rule us and for the police it is, as said, important to show result. If they imposed a law that didn’t create any criminals, it would be a useless law.
The first reason for any law is to create criminals. The second reason for any law is to show how fantastic the government and the police are. Far down the list comes protection that is the main selling-argument.
Back in town
It's a hard life, but someone needs to have all the fun. And Saturday... time for tha Whiskey.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)