I don’t think this is true; it is probably only one of many thingies as a prelude to the American/Israeli attack on Iran - building up the sense of; “attack is a must” among the general sheople.
But I do however hope it is true because this can be fun on so many levels…
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Mexican Government kills youths and police officers
Thanks to Mexican laws and the government’s expanding war on drugs and drug-cartels, three more incidents have occurred.
In Ciudad Juarez a group of armed men stormed a party in this violent northern border city, killing 13 teens and young adults and injuring about two dozen.
Violence also rocked the oceanside Mexican community of Lazaro Cardenas this weekend. Police in the southwestern city say that just after midnight Saturday, about 20 heavily armed gunmen riding in trucks with tinted windows attacked a police station with grenades and assault rifles, killing a police officer and two civilians.
Also this weekend, three women and two men, all identified as Mexican citizens, were murdered while driving in their van with California license plates near the western Mexican city of Navolato. The bodies of the five victims, including a 16-year-old girl, were found riddled with bullets.
So there you have it, death by government, adding to the body-count of several thousands in Mexico alone.
If they instead legalized drugs and legalized citizens free choice drug-cartels and mafia organizations would disappear almost overnight and people could instead buy drugs at any supermarket, scrutinized by the market and at lower prices. Much of the corruption would go away, and billions would be saved in less policing, less imprisonments and lower hospital costs to victims and their families.
But you see it is important for the government to induce fear in people and have someone to fight. Without a government created enemy, what would we need government for? Also it is good for government to have armed thugs fighting other armed thugs, it gives the people someone to ‘trust’ and also fear since government is the only one allowed to own and carry guns.
In Ciudad Juarez a group of armed men stormed a party in this violent northern border city, killing 13 teens and young adults and injuring about two dozen.
Violence also rocked the oceanside Mexican community of Lazaro Cardenas this weekend. Police in the southwestern city say that just after midnight Saturday, about 20 heavily armed gunmen riding in trucks with tinted windows attacked a police station with grenades and assault rifles, killing a police officer and two civilians.
Also this weekend, three women and two men, all identified as Mexican citizens, were murdered while driving in their van with California license plates near the western Mexican city of Navolato. The bodies of the five victims, including a 16-year-old girl, were found riddled with bullets.
So there you have it, death by government, adding to the body-count of several thousands in Mexico alone.
If they instead legalized drugs and legalized citizens free choice drug-cartels and mafia organizations would disappear almost overnight and people could instead buy drugs at any supermarket, scrutinized by the market and at lower prices. Much of the corruption would go away, and billions would be saved in less policing, less imprisonments and lower hospital costs to victims and their families.
But you see it is important for the government to induce fear in people and have someone to fight. Without a government created enemy, what would we need government for? Also it is good for government to have armed thugs fighting other armed thugs, it gives the people someone to ‘trust’ and also fear since government is the only one allowed to own and carry guns.
Tits, boobs and breasts
It is not easy being a female. Britain seemingly is going after females with large operated boobs because Alky Aida may have infiltrated such attributes with bombs or chemicals, and in Australia the Australian Classification Board (ACB) is now banning depictions of small-breasted A-cup breasted women in adult publications and films. Apparently smallish titties automatically conjure up pedophiles.
Presumably small breasted women taking photographs of themselves will now be guilty of creating simulated child pornography at the same time as women with big breasts are potential terrorists. Where are the feminists? This is the sort of thing I would like to see advocates of female liberty to pop up, but they are probably busy with their penis-envy and chasing some poor blond down the street…
One can also assume that Australia and Britain being so closely linked to each other through the commonwealth will have some sort of cooperation surrounding this? If so and if they take the next possible and very feasible step one cannot help to wonder which sort of females that will be allowed to travel from one country to the other…
And what about a woman that have recorded a sex tape with small breasts and then done a boob-job afterwards? Is she an instigator of pedophilia and a terrorist?
Is this how far we have come with evolution of our species?
--- A pedophile creator? -------------------------- A terrorist? ---
Presumably small breasted women taking photographs of themselves will now be guilty of creating simulated child pornography at the same time as women with big breasts are potential terrorists. Where are the feminists? This is the sort of thing I would like to see advocates of female liberty to pop up, but they are probably busy with their penis-envy and chasing some poor blond down the street…
One can also assume that Australia and Britain being so closely linked to each other through the commonwealth will have some sort of cooperation surrounding this? If so and if they take the next possible and very feasible step one cannot help to wonder which sort of females that will be allowed to travel from one country to the other…
And what about a woman that have recorded a sex tape with small breasts and then done a boob-job afterwards? Is she an instigator of pedophilia and a terrorist?
Is this how far we have come with evolution of our species?
--- A pedophile creator? -------------------------- A terrorist? ---
I love the beard…
Budget ax falls on New York
http://money.cnn.com/2010/01/19/news/economy/New_York_budget_deficit/index.htm
25 State Unemployment Funds Bankrupt; Credit Card Defaults at Record Levels;
Look on the Bright Side
http://www.howestreet.com/articles/index.php?article_id=12230
Two Dozen States Unemployment Funds in the Red, Nine More Within Six Months
http://www.propublica.org/feature/unemployment-funds-in-the-red-propublica-predicts-nine-more-within-0119
More and more states on budget brink
http://money.cnn.com/2010/01/14/news/economy/states.woes.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2010011713
Massachusetts schools brace for deep cuts
http://www.boston.com/yourtown/budgetblues/2010/01/massachusetts_schools_brace_fo.html
Eugenics
Visited Englands Freedome, Souldiers Rights and read about how social workers stole a baby since the mother was deemed too unintelligent by authorities.
For me this is eugenics all over again and this isn’t the first time I’ve heard of a story such as this, but it really got my blood boiling.
The duty of the social services, if there’s supposed to be such a thing, should be to offer whatever assistance may be needed to help them on the road to family life, instead of passing judgment on them on very shaky grounds. And stealing the baby directly from the mother’s arms? Fuck!
This is one of those limit things. The last drop that overfills the glass. I can tell you all right now that if any government thug ever did anything like this to me or mine I would go on the mother of all shooting-sprees. I would go after the record.
And I cannot believe how hospital staff and others around just stand by when this was going on. What the fuck!? I would rather die than let any bureaucrat snatch a baby from its mother’s warm embrace. Couldn’t any doctor, nurse or other patient picked up a scalpel and made these two social workers into immediate 5 liter blood donors? What the hell is wrong with people today?
This is heartless totalitarian master-race crap and believe me, it’s coming to you and your family in one form or the other very soon.
For me this is eugenics all over again and this isn’t the first time I’ve heard of a story such as this, but it really got my blood boiling.
The duty of the social services, if there’s supposed to be such a thing, should be to offer whatever assistance may be needed to help them on the road to family life, instead of passing judgment on them on very shaky grounds. And stealing the baby directly from the mother’s arms? Fuck!
This is one of those limit things. The last drop that overfills the glass. I can tell you all right now that if any government thug ever did anything like this to me or mine I would go on the mother of all shooting-sprees. I would go after the record.
And I cannot believe how hospital staff and others around just stand by when this was going on. What the fuck!? I would rather die than let any bureaucrat snatch a baby from its mother’s warm embrace. Couldn’t any doctor, nurse or other patient picked up a scalpel and made these two social workers into immediate 5 liter blood donors? What the hell is wrong with people today?
This is heartless totalitarian master-race crap and believe me, it’s coming to you and your family in one form or the other very soon.
Got a boob-job? No travel for you…
Apparently Alky Aida has already figured out how to avoid body scanners. According to British newspapers they are planning a new stage in its terror campaign by inserting ‘surgical bombs’ inside people and it seems that the body scanners cannot detect them.
A leading source added that male bombers would have the explosive secreted near their appendix or in their buttocks, while females would have the material placed inside their breasts in the same way as figure-enhancing implants.
Oh, so any silicon breasted female and male with to hard buttocks is a potential terrorist? And apparently anyone carrying a syringe should also be regarded as a suspect since these cleverly fiends use chemicals.
Too big boobs. Check.
Too well-shaped butts. Check.
Diabetes people. Check.
How are they going to tackle this one? How about grounding anyone except large ass, flat-chested healthy losers?
You see the terrorist will always find a way, it’s impossible to have 100% protection and there are literarily thousands of ways to bomb, crash or disrupt an airplane. Hell, I know from experience they let you onboard with small knifes and flammable fluids while tossing away your hairgel. And anyone knows that you can MacGyver together a nuclear device from a shoe-string and toothpaste, so why not ground everyone? Do we really need airplanes? Let’s stop all travel, communication and trade, what’s the diff? Right?
This is getting more ridiculous by the minute…
A terrorist?
A leading source added that male bombers would have the explosive secreted near their appendix or in their buttocks, while females would have the material placed inside their breasts in the same way as figure-enhancing implants.
Oh, so any silicon breasted female and male with to hard buttocks is a potential terrorist? And apparently anyone carrying a syringe should also be regarded as a suspect since these cleverly fiends use chemicals.
Too big boobs. Check.
Too well-shaped butts. Check.
Diabetes people. Check.
How are they going to tackle this one? How about grounding anyone except large ass, flat-chested healthy losers?
You see the terrorist will always find a way, it’s impossible to have 100% protection and there are literarily thousands of ways to bomb, crash or disrupt an airplane. Hell, I know from experience they let you onboard with small knifes and flammable fluids while tossing away your hairgel. And anyone knows that you can MacGyver together a nuclear device from a shoe-string and toothpaste, so why not ground everyone? Do we really need airplanes? Let’s stop all travel, communication and trade, what’s the diff? Right?
This is getting more ridiculous by the minute…
A terrorist?
The lying continues
Several funnies have emerged on the scene the latest couple of days, one more deceitful then the other. And as usual mainstream media refuse to do any sort of investigating work or question anything from the powers that be.
The U.S. economy grew in the fourth quarter of 2009, with 5.7%, at the fastest pace in six years, or so they say. Most within media only report this as another sign of better times ahead, but is it really?
Even mainstream economists and business owners in the US remains unconvinced that a full-scale recovery is underway or that substantial job growth would soon follow. A couple of papers have reported on this with quotations from economists believe that most of the fourth-quarter growth was driven by temporary factors like cyclical inventory changes and government stimulus that are likely to fade in the middle of this year.
For the elitists agenda the key question for the U.S. economy, seen to GDP, is the consumer and government. Consumer spending, which alone accounts for about 70% of U.S. economic activity, is the main target to keep fictive GDP-numbers up and sustain what cornflake economists call a solid recovery. Government on the other hand can also contribute through lots of spending, no matter on what which is seen on US military numbers, the only factor to consider is spending so GDP is going up.
But how do you keep consumer spending up when the American people are in-debt like never before, official unemployment is 10% (in reality close to 20%) and the number of producing hours is going down? Well, you can’t, not in the long run. However, excluding autos, consumer spending increased at a 3 percent rate last quarter, the most in three years, indicating the biggest part of the economy was gaining speed. But why? When things look so dire, people really don’t have money, how come they are still spending?
Well, that magic has several ingredients.
Firstly zero interest rates which make it very cheap to borrow and spend.
Secondly an increase in the money supply which make certain parts of the economy to throw notes around.
And thirdly; it all depends on how you count. You see the third-quarter GDP was revised from 3.5 percent (huge “green shoot” in its day) initially to 2.8 percent but it eventually landed at 2.2 percent. Can you say ‘scam’? There’s no reason to think that this will not be done for the fourth quarter.
And looking at the real numbers this potential revised level seems very feasible since the domestic purchases deflator rose 2.1% while the GDP deflator rose 0.6%, meaning that terms of trade adjusted GDP rose 4.2%, not 5.7%. And the very optimistic trade-deficit number also seems to be almost deliberately increased.
But it doesn’t stop there either. As much as 3.4% was because of reduced inventory reductions. Which means that it is a temporarily gain short-term, but may very well impact negatively long-term.
Can’t I see anything bright about this? Of course I can, and if everything else was okay I would even agree with our mainstream soul-killers that things are looking better, but as one of those people using my brain I cannot help considering in factors like a defaulting commercial real-estate and the trillions of borrowing and even more trillions of printing. Well, there are a lot of things about the US economy that points towards total break-down and a huge depression so some GDP numbers that most likely is both exaggerated and comes from temporarily gains shouldn’t rock any yacht.
In addition GDP doesn’t tell us what the real wealth creation level is, GDP only tells us about activity within the economy, any kind of activity. If they, oh let’s say shuffle sand out on sandy beaches, re-build bridges that don’t need re-building, throw lots of cash at the useless manmade global warming scam, spends lots and lots of money on the military and similar ineffectual and expensive hoaxes, well then GDP goes up.
Yet another lie to get you to get another loan and spend your last savings.
The U.S. economy grew in the fourth quarter of 2009, with 5.7%, at the fastest pace in six years, or so they say. Most within media only report this as another sign of better times ahead, but is it really?
Even mainstream economists and business owners in the US remains unconvinced that a full-scale recovery is underway or that substantial job growth would soon follow. A couple of papers have reported on this with quotations from economists believe that most of the fourth-quarter growth was driven by temporary factors like cyclical inventory changes and government stimulus that are likely to fade in the middle of this year.
For the elitists agenda the key question for the U.S. economy, seen to GDP, is the consumer and government. Consumer spending, which alone accounts for about 70% of U.S. economic activity, is the main target to keep fictive GDP-numbers up and sustain what cornflake economists call a solid recovery. Government on the other hand can also contribute through lots of spending, no matter on what which is seen on US military numbers, the only factor to consider is spending so GDP is going up.
But how do you keep consumer spending up when the American people are in-debt like never before, official unemployment is 10% (in reality close to 20%) and the number of producing hours is going down? Well, you can’t, not in the long run. However, excluding autos, consumer spending increased at a 3 percent rate last quarter, the most in three years, indicating the biggest part of the economy was gaining speed. But why? When things look so dire, people really don’t have money, how come they are still spending?
Well, that magic has several ingredients.
Firstly zero interest rates which make it very cheap to borrow and spend.
Secondly an increase in the money supply which make certain parts of the economy to throw notes around.
And thirdly; it all depends on how you count. You see the third-quarter GDP was revised from 3.5 percent (huge “green shoot” in its day) initially to 2.8 percent but it eventually landed at 2.2 percent. Can you say ‘scam’? There’s no reason to think that this will not be done for the fourth quarter.
And looking at the real numbers this potential revised level seems very feasible since the domestic purchases deflator rose 2.1% while the GDP deflator rose 0.6%, meaning that terms of trade adjusted GDP rose 4.2%, not 5.7%. And the very optimistic trade-deficit number also seems to be almost deliberately increased.
But it doesn’t stop there either. As much as 3.4% was because of reduced inventory reductions. Which means that it is a temporarily gain short-term, but may very well impact negatively long-term.
Can’t I see anything bright about this? Of course I can, and if everything else was okay I would even agree with our mainstream soul-killers that things are looking better, but as one of those people using my brain I cannot help considering in factors like a defaulting commercial real-estate and the trillions of borrowing and even more trillions of printing. Well, there are a lot of things about the US economy that points towards total break-down and a huge depression so some GDP numbers that most likely is both exaggerated and comes from temporarily gains shouldn’t rock any yacht.
In addition GDP doesn’t tell us what the real wealth creation level is, GDP only tells us about activity within the economy, any kind of activity. If they, oh let’s say shuffle sand out on sandy beaches, re-build bridges that don’t need re-building, throw lots of cash at the useless manmade global warming scam, spends lots and lots of money on the military and similar ineffectual and expensive hoaxes, well then GDP goes up.
Yet another lie to get you to get another loan and spend your last savings.
And so we enter the second act
A former police chief is suspected of rape in an expanding sex ring investigation in Sweden and a number of other well-known men are also said to be under investigation.
Göran Lindberg is the name of the man and he’s a former respected law enforcement official, among other things know for his commitment to feminist ideas.
Apparently Lindberg’s name came up unexpectedly in connection with the investigation of a suspicious death in the suburbs of Stockholm.
In July of 2009 a 60-year-old man mysteriously fell to his death from a balcony and police launched a preliminary investigation into the suspected murder. During the investigation, police confiscated a computer and a mobile phone which belonged to the deceased 60-year-old.
When investigators examined the contents of the machines and found the names of several men, they realized they had stumbled upon a new sex ring (including several rape of minors) and handed the matter over to the Stockholm County police force. However, it wasn’t Lindberg’s name that first caused a stir among the investigators, but the names of several other men. Makes you wonder who else is on that list eh? Of course the police have since then refuted any claim of other names…
Anyway, can you see one of the central themes of this movie-like development?
Okay let me continue the story.
You see the kiddy rapist had, together with his friends, this little sex-ring mainly online, of course. They used computers, internet and such to find each other and some (all?) of their victims.
Still not in-tuned? Well how about this neat little statement from our friend Göran:
“It is so easy to connect nowadays, everything is so excisable.” – meaning internet…
But this diminutive story doesn’t really stop there, because when looking around newspapers the latest days when above have played out, I think I never read so many anti-free-internet stories as during these days.
Only today you can read about how some email con-artist have stolen peoples identities, how the Swedish Film institute wants to combat web-piracy, how John Edwards sex-flick is floating around internet, and how easy any hacker can take control over your computer. And these are just a small portion of all the stuff you can find.
This sort of comes out as a conspiracy, it’s not. The elitists will however not waste any time; as soon as anything of the sort becomes news they will milk it with the same arguments, hammering them into the consciousness of the general public. And so little by little, step by step, they can implement their fascist ideas while the sheople might even thank ‘em for it, you know, we need to think of the Childreeeeen…
This will continue for a while, people are not yet ready for the next act wherein the PTB will take us into the total totalitarian state comes to information, so they need to sneak it in through the backdoor. And as with any rear-end usage they lube us with continuous caresses and kisses, saying everything will be okay, just think of the kids and how we can save us from terrorists. Bit down on the pillow please, it will soon feel better.
Göran Lindberg is the name of the man and he’s a former respected law enforcement official, among other things know for his commitment to feminist ideas.
Apparently Lindberg’s name came up unexpectedly in connection with the investigation of a suspicious death in the suburbs of Stockholm.
In July of 2009 a 60-year-old man mysteriously fell to his death from a balcony and police launched a preliminary investigation into the suspected murder. During the investigation, police confiscated a computer and a mobile phone which belonged to the deceased 60-year-old.
When investigators examined the contents of the machines and found the names of several men, they realized they had stumbled upon a new sex ring (including several rape of minors) and handed the matter over to the Stockholm County police force. However, it wasn’t Lindberg’s name that first caused a stir among the investigators, but the names of several other men. Makes you wonder who else is on that list eh? Of course the police have since then refuted any claim of other names…
Anyway, can you see one of the central themes of this movie-like development?
Okay let me continue the story.
You see the kiddy rapist had, together with his friends, this little sex-ring mainly online, of course. They used computers, internet and such to find each other and some (all?) of their victims.
Still not in-tuned? Well how about this neat little statement from our friend Göran:
“It is so easy to connect nowadays, everything is so excisable.” – meaning internet…
But this diminutive story doesn’t really stop there, because when looking around newspapers the latest days when above have played out, I think I never read so many anti-free-internet stories as during these days.
Only today you can read about how some email con-artist have stolen peoples identities, how the Swedish Film institute wants to combat web-piracy, how John Edwards sex-flick is floating around internet, and how easy any hacker can take control over your computer. And these are just a small portion of all the stuff you can find.
This sort of comes out as a conspiracy, it’s not. The elitists will however not waste any time; as soon as anything of the sort becomes news they will milk it with the same arguments, hammering them into the consciousness of the general public. And so little by little, step by step, they can implement their fascist ideas while the sheople might even thank ‘em for it, you know, we need to think of the Childreeeeen…
This will continue for a while, people are not yet ready for the next act wherein the PTB will take us into the total totalitarian state comes to information, so they need to sneak it in through the backdoor. And as with any rear-end usage they lube us with continuous caresses and kisses, saying everything will be okay, just think of the kids and how we can save us from terrorists. Bit down on the pillow please, it will soon feel better.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)