Apparently tens of people dies in Mexico drug wars every day. Add to this the people dying from overdoses and the enormous cost for government as well as kingpins and we have a stupid mess that easily can be avoided.
Let people eat, drink, inject, smoke or sniff whatever they like. Let people grow and manufacture drugs by themselves and let there be drug departments at every supermarket and local store. If just government gets their dirty hands out of the mix; we would not only have cleaner and cheaper drugs but also no mafia, no drug lords and no wars were people dies. Someone might argue that the amount of people testing drugs would increase with excess and cheaper product and that might be partly true, at least in the beginning when it is news. But even IF more people would test drugs, it would be safer since it is now controlled on the market, it would be cleaner leading to less overdoses and it would come with better and more information so people don’t mix drugs or take too much. Another consequence is that drugs would no longer be handled by some sleazebag who might kill you or wreaks havoc in the society. A big win for all parties, except of course the government cronies who would lose a bit of purpose and it would be a big failure for politician’s mindless propaganda about how useful they are. And this is the main reason why governments don’t want to let you decide over your own body.
If people realized that government is the problem and is highly responsible for all these dead people, people might start questioning other functions public officials does. And having no means to defend ourselves – courtesy of the governments laws – we are dependent on armed government employees to do the protecting for us, and that power they will never want to get rid of. The war against drugs have never been about protecting or saving people, it is only about control, when are you all going to realize this?
Saturday, April 11, 2009
Social democrat idiots
The left opposition in Sweden has figured out the perfect way of getting the elderly votes; they want people at old folk’s homes to have the pleasure to eat and drink good things 5 times a year. They are even going to have the choice on choosing the days. Oh, fantastic. Can’t you hear 80 year olds everywhere jubilant doing an extra turn with their wheel-walkers?
In the wake of deceitful union leaders and a repulsive and totally stupid party leader, they are now relaying on suggestions like this in order to get votes again. Why not turn to the dark arts and throw some hexes on the government? Or why not promise eternal life? I wonder who among the baboons that came up with this idea and this after the scandal with AMF… And why only 5 days? Is there a thought behind this? Are the elderly only capable to handle alcohol and good food every 73rd day? And the other thing I’m thinking of is how the old folks can choice these days? Can they save them over time and have some extra the year after? And what if they decide to throw a 5 day bench-drinking and lavish feasting week? That might actually kill one or two. Maybe that’s the plan?
In Sweden the choice is minimal, either you pay taxes your entire life and when you grow old you end up in a place where you die forgotten and hardly looked after. Or, you pay taxes and when you grow old you end up in a place where you die pretty much ignored and hardly looked after. The private choices are nonexistent and you can only rely on the state to provide for you and that always end up in a malevolent way. The tax money? Well, they are picked up by klepto-politicians and are wasted on departments and committees who do everything to ruin lives before they reach old age.
This suggestion is a slap over the face and shows a strategy only poisonous socialists can come up with. People should keep their own money and invest in their old age on their own instead of letting lazy incompetent lefties dictated when they can get a decent meal. Among all the brainless proposals socialists have thrown out of their black hearts, this certainly break in on the top ten stupidity-list. It is a horrifying suggestion in many ways buy it is also political suicide and I cannot imagine anyone celebrating this dim-witted scheme other than a way of pointing out the socialist’s lack of ideas. They have incoherent and totally mad policies in general and the consequents of that everyone can see today with the ongoing crisis. But on the other hand, you are all idiots, wouldn’t surprise me if several of you salute this electoral strategy.
In the wake of deceitful union leaders and a repulsive and totally stupid party leader, they are now relaying on suggestions like this in order to get votes again. Why not turn to the dark arts and throw some hexes on the government? Or why not promise eternal life? I wonder who among the baboons that came up with this idea and this after the scandal with AMF… And why only 5 days? Is there a thought behind this? Are the elderly only capable to handle alcohol and good food every 73rd day? And the other thing I’m thinking of is how the old folks can choice these days? Can they save them over time and have some extra the year after? And what if they decide to throw a 5 day bench-drinking and lavish feasting week? That might actually kill one or two. Maybe that’s the plan?
In Sweden the choice is minimal, either you pay taxes your entire life and when you grow old you end up in a place where you die forgotten and hardly looked after. Or, you pay taxes and when you grow old you end up in a place where you die pretty much ignored and hardly looked after. The private choices are nonexistent and you can only rely on the state to provide for you and that always end up in a malevolent way. The tax money? Well, they are picked up by klepto-politicians and are wasted on departments and committees who do everything to ruin lives before they reach old age.
This suggestion is a slap over the face and shows a strategy only poisonous socialists can come up with. People should keep their own money and invest in their old age on their own instead of letting lazy incompetent lefties dictated when they can get a decent meal. Among all the brainless proposals socialists have thrown out of their black hearts, this certainly break in on the top ten stupidity-list. It is a horrifying suggestion in many ways buy it is also political suicide and I cannot imagine anyone celebrating this dim-witted scheme other than a way of pointing out the socialist’s lack of ideas. They have incoherent and totally mad policies in general and the consequents of that everyone can see today with the ongoing crisis. But on the other hand, you are all idiots, wouldn’t surprise me if several of you salute this electoral strategy.
Man-made global warming takes too long
Sure this woman is highly stupid, but on the other hand, this would never happen if those retched creatures were still around. Let’s kill them already.
Socialist’s views coming true
In China the government has issued an order to lower the salaries of executives of state-owned banks and insurers. This while Gordon Brown and his cronies is trying to hunt down tax heavens to bolster their manic spending, deficits keep growing everywhere and several amusement parks around the world are laying of personal and going over to red numbers. Socialists everywhere are obviously coming together in a beautiful mess of violence and high fives in order to induce the crisis further.
In the United States several of the banks wants to pay back the money they got in bail-outs, but of course the socialist government doesn’t want to let go of their control. More good news for the lefties are that the world economies have an accelerated fall in world trade and this at the fastest rate seen in decades. People trading is something horrible according to all socialist views so millions of people now suffering and going to die from lower globalization is great news. Meanwhile in Bolivia the president is going on a hunger-strike for not getting to be more like a true dictator.
In Kenya child malnutrition is growing rapidly while pirates are roaming the seas. And the number of people dying from starvation in eastern Africa is growing, all according to plan. While socialists in Sweden are complaining over director salaries all is well around the planet. Although not really a paradise yet, the recession is doing great things to increase taxes, debts and government size all over the world.
In the United States several of the banks wants to pay back the money they got in bail-outs, but of course the socialist government doesn’t want to let go of their control. More good news for the lefties are that the world economies have an accelerated fall in world trade and this at the fastest rate seen in decades. People trading is something horrible according to all socialist views so millions of people now suffering and going to die from lower globalization is great news. Meanwhile in Bolivia the president is going on a hunger-strike for not getting to be more like a true dictator.
In Kenya child malnutrition is growing rapidly while pirates are roaming the seas. And the number of people dying from starvation in eastern Africa is growing, all according to plan. While socialists in Sweden are complaining over director salaries all is well around the planet. Although not really a paradise yet, the recession is doing great things to increase taxes, debts and government size all over the world.
Who should be blamed?
With the kind of success I had with my last poll, I thought it would be fun to see what you that visit this place think about who is really to blame for all the madness and stupidities in this world.
Rulers/dictators
I have always felt a bit sorry for all rulers throughout history, getting blamed for everything. I mean is it really their fault that people vote, fight and dies for them? And the silent majority apparently is able to handle anything you do to them. You can starve them or make them go to war, you can take their virgin daughters and have them marching up and down to silly music and they will salute you for it. But then again, getting to the top and staying there demands political stamina and great sneakiness. Even those ‘great leaders’ that have been born into their occupation needs to keep religious groups, party members or generals happy or they would not last very long. So every king, pharaoh or tyrant has also been a great politician, at least they must be until they have a firm grip of power. This means that there is also evil in them from the start. And many of the craziest ideas have come from rules, so they should be blamed, but to what degree?
Support troops
But what would any leader be without a loyal following? The support troops come in different varieties and you could actually make a very long list. Everything from health- and drug administration’s to social-workers, from journalists to priests, from musicians to board members, from directors to the very rich and so on. These are the people that the leader from time to time needs to rely on in order to dupe the populace and to support every notion that comes from above. As long as the one in charge keeps the support troops happy with lavish salaries, some of those virgins (those discarded by the leader for being too old or of the wrong ethnicity), different nice titles and other things, they can be trusted. These are also, for the most part, societies must prominent members with high education and a great understanding how things work. The leader isn’t necessarily the smartest of the bunch, but among the supporting people there will be some with very high intellect. This means that many of these have been and are fully aware about what policies, laws and such leads to, so in a way they are the worst criminals since they know what is wrong and might even know how to fix it, but they don’t, mainly to keep their status and salaries. Of course you can argue that they also are afraid and if the leader is sneaky enough he has created enough mistrust among these followers so they cannot rally together nor do any harm to the one in charge.
Armed forces
And no ruler or government can last very long without the support of the armed forces. For the most part these guys have been very loyal and highly supportive of everything government has been doing. Kind of like that dumb cousin that follows you around everywhere and does whatever he is told. On occasion the armed forces have rioted and done their part in overthrowing some leader or government, but not really that often. This might be because they always are the military/army/police no matter who is in charge. It doesn’t really matter for their occupation which policies the government has, they go on with the same maneuvers and have about the same task either way. Sure the laws might change and with certain governments the risk of war increases, but that mainly semantics, the armed forces has the job of enforcing the law and “protecting” the country and its leaders and that’s pretty much it. And the hierarchy with orders that most be followed doesn’t really allow too much independent thinking. Still these people have the power to do something about atrocities but have instead been the main doers of said atrocities. Without the armed forces: no dictatorship and no death camps so surely these guys most get some of the blame.
The people
But what would any government be without the great mass of highly stupid “normal” people. This is the waste majority and if banded together they could easily overthrow any government, no matter what the support troops or armed forces do. These are also the ones that normally vote for and push the leaders forward to achieve great things like holocausts and mass-starvation. Sure you can argue that it is hard to band together or that the support troops have duped them. And sure the armed forces, although a clear minority, holds a certain deterrent. And sure most people care more about getting a job, food and some basic necessities rather than politics. But still, these are the guys mainly suffering and are mainly taken advantage of and still they do nothing. No government can produce anything; only take what others (the people) have created. Also the people are very easy to fool. All the government really needs to do is to find a scapegoat to blame everything on and/or have a pretty effective propaganda machine and people will do pretty much anything for their leaders tell them. And if the people believe in and pray to some spooky father figure that the government supports they will go through hellfire to help the government steal, cheat, control, dupe and kill them. So aren’t these ones the main source of all evil?
Secret societies
I know this topic will get some votes because many of you idiots think that the “Illuminati” or the Freemasons or some Bilderberg group runs the show. Even if I can support some of those notions, it is mainly pure idiocy. But still, can there not be some secret people running around doing all the real damage? Well founded and maybe even with some alien help (if you believe certain series) they secretly rule the world… Ohoooo…
Rulers/dictators
I have always felt a bit sorry for all rulers throughout history, getting blamed for everything. I mean is it really their fault that people vote, fight and dies for them? And the silent majority apparently is able to handle anything you do to them. You can starve them or make them go to war, you can take their virgin daughters and have them marching up and down to silly music and they will salute you for it. But then again, getting to the top and staying there demands political stamina and great sneakiness. Even those ‘great leaders’ that have been born into their occupation needs to keep religious groups, party members or generals happy or they would not last very long. So every king, pharaoh or tyrant has also been a great politician, at least they must be until they have a firm grip of power. This means that there is also evil in them from the start. And many of the craziest ideas have come from rules, so they should be blamed, but to what degree?
Support troops
But what would any leader be without a loyal following? The support troops come in different varieties and you could actually make a very long list. Everything from health- and drug administration’s to social-workers, from journalists to priests, from musicians to board members, from directors to the very rich and so on. These are the people that the leader from time to time needs to rely on in order to dupe the populace and to support every notion that comes from above. As long as the one in charge keeps the support troops happy with lavish salaries, some of those virgins (those discarded by the leader for being too old or of the wrong ethnicity), different nice titles and other things, they can be trusted. These are also, for the most part, societies must prominent members with high education and a great understanding how things work. The leader isn’t necessarily the smartest of the bunch, but among the supporting people there will be some with very high intellect. This means that many of these have been and are fully aware about what policies, laws and such leads to, so in a way they are the worst criminals since they know what is wrong and might even know how to fix it, but they don’t, mainly to keep their status and salaries. Of course you can argue that they also are afraid and if the leader is sneaky enough he has created enough mistrust among these followers so they cannot rally together nor do any harm to the one in charge.
Armed forces
And no ruler or government can last very long without the support of the armed forces. For the most part these guys have been very loyal and highly supportive of everything government has been doing. Kind of like that dumb cousin that follows you around everywhere and does whatever he is told. On occasion the armed forces have rioted and done their part in overthrowing some leader or government, but not really that often. This might be because they always are the military/army/police no matter who is in charge. It doesn’t really matter for their occupation which policies the government has, they go on with the same maneuvers and have about the same task either way. Sure the laws might change and with certain governments the risk of war increases, but that mainly semantics, the armed forces has the job of enforcing the law and “protecting” the country and its leaders and that’s pretty much it. And the hierarchy with orders that most be followed doesn’t really allow too much independent thinking. Still these people have the power to do something about atrocities but have instead been the main doers of said atrocities. Without the armed forces: no dictatorship and no death camps so surely these guys most get some of the blame.
The people
But what would any government be without the great mass of highly stupid “normal” people. This is the waste majority and if banded together they could easily overthrow any government, no matter what the support troops or armed forces do. These are also the ones that normally vote for and push the leaders forward to achieve great things like holocausts and mass-starvation. Sure you can argue that it is hard to band together or that the support troops have duped them. And sure the armed forces, although a clear minority, holds a certain deterrent. And sure most people care more about getting a job, food and some basic necessities rather than politics. But still, these are the guys mainly suffering and are mainly taken advantage of and still they do nothing. No government can produce anything; only take what others (the people) have created. Also the people are very easy to fool. All the government really needs to do is to find a scapegoat to blame everything on and/or have a pretty effective propaganda machine and people will do pretty much anything for their leaders tell them. And if the people believe in and pray to some spooky father figure that the government supports they will go through hellfire to help the government steal, cheat, control, dupe and kill them. So aren’t these ones the main source of all evil?
Secret societies
I know this topic will get some votes because many of you idiots think that the “Illuminati” or the Freemasons or some Bilderberg group runs the show. Even if I can support some of those notions, it is mainly pure idiocy. But still, can there not be some secret people running around doing all the real damage? Well founded and maybe even with some alien help (if you believe certain series) they secretly rule the world… Ohoooo…
Looting socialists getting what they want
There is a debate going on in Sweden (for the fortyfiftthousand time) about directors and corporate finance people getting pension deals and to high salary. Although I can understand why so many people get upset over these people getting millions when there is a crisis created by too much government hovering over us there is still some interesting things to point out. First of all, many of these agreements were made during better times and why should someone break them just because times gets worse? Secondly those who complain about this do it all the time, not just during this crisis, and those people are also true believers of the looting socialism that is responsible for this crisis, so instead of complaining they should be ashamed. Thirdly those complaining are the ones telling everyone that we need more bail-outs and more stimuli to save jobs, in essence they are the ones wanting many of these ill managed companies to have more money.
We are in the middle of a socialist crisis of average size, but the socialists are not happy until we have that depression they are looking forward to. The socialist mind is based on a looting mentality and its rot can be found in the reptile part of the brain were this cave man attitude still lurks so these creatures who want everything to be "free" and "complementary" should rejoice when the economy goes down, everything they want is getting to be true. They always want to have a deficit, congratulations. They always want the government to print and spend more money, good for all of us they are getting what they want. The lefties also want to embezzle more through higher taxes and more regulations, well this is great then. This system is a sick sick drug-addict based on the collectivization and socialization of humans and when the first waves of this crisis hits us, they want more of the same thing. Your socialist dreams are coming true, rejoice and be happy. Socialism "works" after all, so stop complaining and do the dance of joy when the taxes, the deficit and the recession grow and grow. What we should do, in a sound and capitalist world, is of course to cut spending, privatize money and stop giving away “free” stuff to every lazy socialist out there. But that’s not going to happen, because all you people are idiots.
We are in the middle of a socialist crisis of average size, but the socialists are not happy until we have that depression they are looking forward to. The socialist mind is based on a looting mentality and its rot can be found in the reptile part of the brain were this cave man attitude still lurks so these creatures who want everything to be "free" and "complementary" should rejoice when the economy goes down, everything they want is getting to be true. They always want to have a deficit, congratulations. They always want the government to print and spend more money, good for all of us they are getting what they want. The lefties also want to embezzle more through higher taxes and more regulations, well this is great then. This system is a sick sick drug-addict based on the collectivization and socialization of humans and when the first waves of this crisis hits us, they want more of the same thing. Your socialist dreams are coming true, rejoice and be happy. Socialism "works" after all, so stop complaining and do the dance of joy when the taxes, the deficit and the recession grow and grow. What we should do, in a sound and capitalist world, is of course to cut spending, privatize money and stop giving away “free” stuff to every lazy socialist out there. But that’s not going to happen, because all you people are idiots.
Don’t blame all males.
Do you know what happens when a man tries to get involved, want to help out and applies to be a part of different programs to help rape victims? He gets ignored, if he is lucky. In some cases he is regarded as a suspect himself and don’t even try to walk into a women care-center, the looks you get will make you feel very uneasy. And if you walk with a friend or girlfriend that has been raped to social services or some other institution that is supposed to help out, you really feel the distress and how they really, really, don’t want you there. Try to get involved in some of the psychological therapy and you get thrown out. The only way to even show some support is to either write some editorial, which will be ignored by many female support groups (you are a male, you cannot understand) or you become politically involved in some feminist movement were you are not very welcome either. I’m not trying to undermine the hurt and the terribly ordeal these women go through, but the males standing at the side-line helplessly looking at this without being able to do nothing while several people cries about the male species and how horrible anyone with a penis is, are victims too. Don’t blame all males for what some does and to all your women out there, get a gun or some other weapon. The government and laws be damned, if some prick comes at you, shot the bastard and shot him good.
He should walk in this case
An alleged rape victim, a 15 year old girl, have committed suicide in Sweden. Now the suspected rapist will walk free since the entire case was based on the girl’s story. When you read the different blogs and even the news articles you get the impression that it was an open and shut case, all this girl had to do was to show up and this rapist a-hole would go to jail. Also you get the impression that this girl took her life because of the pressure from this trial. But little of this seems to be true in reality.
First of all this girl seems to have had several problems, doing drugs, self mutilations and such and certainly the extra pressure might have made her take this drastic measure, but from what I can read that connection is not completely valid. Secondly as said, it was only her words that she got raped. If there was any further evidence the trial might go on. There are several bad video recordings and part transcripts of the interrogation of this girl and the man in question has admitted having sex with her and there is also some suspicions of other girls and apparently one other girl were supposed to have testified, so one might think this as ground enough to prosecute, but the prosecuting attorney is convinced he cannot win and consequently dropped the charges, which he should do according to Swedish praxis. If there is no evidence and only someone’s word against someone else, that is never a good point to start from when going to trial. It all comes down to credibility. And this guy is going to be trialed for drugs and another case of alleged rape.
Whatever is true in these rape charges, the ones who really should be blamed are the social authorities and different social workers that seemingly have done nothing despite her families constant plies for help. The thing that is supposed to help and is paid by the tax payers to do exactly these kinds of work, failed miserably. Based on the information at hand, this alleged rapist should walk, that is in all likelihood the correct decision, but I do hope this girl’s family and others don’t let the social services get away from not doing their jobs, they should not be able to walk away from this.
First of all this girl seems to have had several problems, doing drugs, self mutilations and such and certainly the extra pressure might have made her take this drastic measure, but from what I can read that connection is not completely valid. Secondly as said, it was only her words that she got raped. If there was any further evidence the trial might go on. There are several bad video recordings and part transcripts of the interrogation of this girl and the man in question has admitted having sex with her and there is also some suspicions of other girls and apparently one other girl were supposed to have testified, so one might think this as ground enough to prosecute, but the prosecuting attorney is convinced he cannot win and consequently dropped the charges, which he should do according to Swedish praxis. If there is no evidence and only someone’s word against someone else, that is never a good point to start from when going to trial. It all comes down to credibility. And this guy is going to be trialed for drugs and another case of alleged rape.
Whatever is true in these rape charges, the ones who really should be blamed are the social authorities and different social workers that seemingly have done nothing despite her families constant plies for help. The thing that is supposed to help and is paid by the tax payers to do exactly these kinds of work, failed miserably. Based on the information at hand, this alleged rapist should walk, that is in all likelihood the correct decision, but I do hope this girl’s family and others don’t let the social services get away from not doing their jobs, they should not be able to walk away from this.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)