The end is nigh and The Greatest Depression is closing in with millions of ferocious, unemployed, disillusioned and helplessly starving infected people erratically walking an unforgiving earth for years to come. Truth to be told we´re heading for a financial apocalypse because you, the people, believe in any tall tale The Powers That Be cables out. All we can do now is to wait for the fattest lady in history to sing the highest note ever heard...
Monday, September 21, 2009
Do you understand economics?
Well, the headline may be more accurate if you exchange the word “economics” with the word “math”, but the Market ticker have a nice little test for you to do. This test is recommended to a large extent to economic majors, finance Mentalists and banksters, but you as a layman should also read it through a couple of times. If you do not really grasp the economic language, think of it as basic math.
Looking around Europe, this is the place we are heading as well. Not really as bad as in the US, yet, however, the road is clear and the further down it we are when these bubbles in the American economy bursts, the worse the coming debacle will be. Right now we are already passed the levels of the Great Depression, imagine where we will be in a year from now…
Looking at my native homeland, Sweden, the similarities between US 2 years ago and Sweden today is striking. The same low (but even lower in today’s Sweden) interest rates, the same printing of money, the same loose policy for the banking system - in Sweden few banks with lots of trouble - and the same (but higher) amount of borrowing both from the private as well as the public sector. Add to this high unemployment and the coming collapse of several markets in the US, UK and so forth, and you need to start looking in the book of revelations to find proper adjectives.
If you are an economist or want to understand why this crisis isn't over: Check out this post
Let’s see if you whom have a degree in economics understand math and economics. Otherwise I recommend what Mr. Denninger does, hand back your diploma and start flipper burgers instead (highly recomended for central bank-people and the Finance Department) so you do not help out with the destruction of the economy.
The Market Ticker
Looking around Europe, this is the place we are heading as well. Not really as bad as in the US, yet, however, the road is clear and the further down it we are when these bubbles in the American economy bursts, the worse the coming debacle will be. Right now we are already passed the levels of the Great Depression, imagine where we will be in a year from now…
Looking at my native homeland, Sweden, the similarities between US 2 years ago and Sweden today is striking. The same low (but even lower in today’s Sweden) interest rates, the same printing of money, the same loose policy for the banking system - in Sweden few banks with lots of trouble - and the same (but higher) amount of borrowing both from the private as well as the public sector. Add to this high unemployment and the coming collapse of several markets in the US, UK and so forth, and you need to start looking in the book of revelations to find proper adjectives.
If you are an economist or want to understand why this crisis isn't over: Check out this post
Let’s see if you whom have a degree in economics understand math and economics. Otherwise I recommend what Mr. Denninger does, hand back your diploma and start flipper burgers instead (highly recomended for central bank-people and the Finance Department) so you do not help out with the destruction of the economy.
The Market Ticker
The Climate deception
As I have pointed out before, there is not a single evidence for manmade global warming causing any sort of problem; in fact there isn’t even evidence for the existence of manmade global warming. We can only assume that man has some slim miniscule impact, but the fact is we don’t know. On the contrary, all the scientific evidence and all real reports seem to suggest the opposite of what the environmentalists are saying.
And my £100 to anyone that produces a single evidence for what the alarmists are saying still stands. Would love to see any of you idiots try to get that money.
So it is with a degree of satisfaction I have noticed that more and more people are waking up and smelling this, the biggest scam of all time. For instance in Copenhagen an alternative climate-meeting is going to be held at the same time as the elitists, tricksters and fraudulent liars have theirs.
This is really a check of intellect that beats any Mensa-test. Anyone that believes in this obvious scam is an idiot, plain and simple. Are you an idiot?
And my £100 to anyone that produces a single evidence for what the alarmists are saying still stands. Would love to see any of you idiots try to get that money.
So it is with a degree of satisfaction I have noticed that more and more people are waking up and smelling this, the biggest scam of all time. For instance in Copenhagen an alternative climate-meeting is going to be held at the same time as the elitists, tricksters and fraudulent liars have theirs.
This is really a check of intellect that beats any Mensa-test. Anyone that believes in this obvious scam is an idiot, plain and simple. Are you an idiot?
GDP once and for all
For you, the people, to really know what’s what and for you to see through the lies it is necessary to know what GDP really is, how it is measured and why it’s so important for our enemies to deliver positive numbers. GDP is all about blowing a handful of pixie-dust in our eyes to keep us looking at something irrelevant in order to keep something that is important out of the limelight. But even worse than that, this trickery can make us poorer over time.
Let’s start by looking at how GDP is normally calculated.
GDP = private consumption + gross investment + government spending + (exports − imports), or,
GDP = C + I + G + (X − M)
I want you all to take notice on a couple of things in this equation. Firstly exports VS imports or X-M. In the world of basic math this part means that if exports grow in relation to imports GDP increases. If imports grow, GDP goes down. The same happens if either goes down in relation to the other. Okay? With me? This is very basic math that you should be able to figure this out at middle school – which, of course, means that economist, Finance Mentalists, journalists and some other idiots cannot manage it.
What the equation also tells us is that if Government spends more, GDP goes up. You probably get this, but what you really need to know is that it has no real meaning what they spend money on. It can be daycare, roads or flowers, it does not matter. According to GDP calculation it is beneficiary to have people dig holes in ground, fill them up again, and do this over and over. In fact, this is what government often does, not directly, that would be too obvious, but through other schemes like “investigations” or useless government programs to hide unemployment. An investigation takes manpower, costs money and often leads to conclusions a monkey could tell us beforehand. Anything being done to cover up people’s lack of jobs also cost money. Actually it may cost more, in essence contribute more to GDP, then if people in fact had productive jobs.
The same goes for private consumption. The more we shop ‘till we drop, the higher GDP. In the eyes of Keynesians and our enemies it means that the more stuff you buy, the better. This private consumption is not really subjected to any scrutiny other than the notion of spending. If you borrow, use your credit-card or (hardly ever) work to get that money to spend it, is irrelevant, what matters is GDP. Sometimes you can hear one or two voices claiming that savings are to low or that there is a difference in what we actually consume, but those are very few and not nearly as interesting for the media to quote.
All this mentioned is why they are keeping interest rates at zero, throws cheap newly printed money into the system and encourage you to take loans. This is also the main reason why the regime, any of them, continues to bail-out banks, because without getting you and themselves into debt, the system does not really work. The entire structure is built around and dependent on debt. Journalists, pundits, cornflake economists and teachers have either fallen for this swindle or are in cahoots with the elitists.
It is not bad to be in debt, you might claim, and correctly so, but then only if this debt is based on actual value or income. What is bad is when you use loans to buy stuff, in particular when you buy stuff you already have or don’t need and this on the assumption of income or value.
Once and for all: Consumption does NOT CREATE wealth!
What creates value is our productivity, or rather that we actually produce things. If we take something from nature, transform it, mold it, paint it, and make it into something useful that creates value in form of electricity, saves us time or makes future production better, faster or cheaper, then we have created wealth.
Services can also contribute, but then only to enhance our wellbeing or to save time.
And consumption needs to come out of this, not be the basic of the entire system.
Consumption is a good thing and it is our “reward” for being good at producing.
Consumption is not, however, what drives the economy as this GDP-madness and our enemies would like you to think.
With this entire structure in mind, what do massive amounts of stimulus; more debt (both personal and public) and a complete focus on consumption lead us? It leads to poverty and less options. The more indebt we are, the more government spends and the more we are focused on services and consumption, the less actual wealth is created even if GDP goes up. This is why GDP can be positive, but we can still get poorer. It’s all a trickery of the mind, its one big con and you have fallen for it.
This is also one of the reasons why I, and many others, could see this crisis many miles away. To anyone that understand that 1+1=2 and 2-1=1, this depression is not a surprise, its only the logical consequence of too much government, too much regulations and too much consumption on borrowed money. So this crisis cannot be over, it’s a mathematical and factual impossibility, in fact we are just in the beginning of it.
Any budget not tackling the real issue is a horrible budget.
Any politician that wants you to consume instead of produce is your enemy. Journalists and pundits that are lap-dogs to the rich and powerful should be strapped down and be worked-over with a rusty serrated bread knife.
We are being screwed by the elitists and the sooner you wake up, the sooner we can work ourselves out of this mess.
Let’s start by looking at how GDP is normally calculated.
GDP = private consumption + gross investment + government spending + (exports − imports), or,
GDP = C + I + G + (X − M)
I want you all to take notice on a couple of things in this equation. Firstly exports VS imports or X-M. In the world of basic math this part means that if exports grow in relation to imports GDP increases. If imports grow, GDP goes down. The same happens if either goes down in relation to the other. Okay? With me? This is very basic math that you should be able to figure this out at middle school – which, of course, means that economist, Finance Mentalists, journalists and some other idiots cannot manage it.
What the equation also tells us is that if Government spends more, GDP goes up. You probably get this, but what you really need to know is that it has no real meaning what they spend money on. It can be daycare, roads or flowers, it does not matter. According to GDP calculation it is beneficiary to have people dig holes in ground, fill them up again, and do this over and over. In fact, this is what government often does, not directly, that would be too obvious, but through other schemes like “investigations” or useless government programs to hide unemployment. An investigation takes manpower, costs money and often leads to conclusions a monkey could tell us beforehand. Anything being done to cover up people’s lack of jobs also cost money. Actually it may cost more, in essence contribute more to GDP, then if people in fact had productive jobs.
The same goes for private consumption. The more we shop ‘till we drop, the higher GDP. In the eyes of Keynesians and our enemies it means that the more stuff you buy, the better. This private consumption is not really subjected to any scrutiny other than the notion of spending. If you borrow, use your credit-card or (hardly ever) work to get that money to spend it, is irrelevant, what matters is GDP. Sometimes you can hear one or two voices claiming that savings are to low or that there is a difference in what we actually consume, but those are very few and not nearly as interesting for the media to quote.
All this mentioned is why they are keeping interest rates at zero, throws cheap newly printed money into the system and encourage you to take loans. This is also the main reason why the regime, any of them, continues to bail-out banks, because without getting you and themselves into debt, the system does not really work. The entire structure is built around and dependent on debt. Journalists, pundits, cornflake economists and teachers have either fallen for this swindle or are in cahoots with the elitists.
It is not bad to be in debt, you might claim, and correctly so, but then only if this debt is based on actual value or income. What is bad is when you use loans to buy stuff, in particular when you buy stuff you already have or don’t need and this on the assumption of income or value.
Once and for all: Consumption does NOT CREATE wealth!
What creates value is our productivity, or rather that we actually produce things. If we take something from nature, transform it, mold it, paint it, and make it into something useful that creates value in form of electricity, saves us time or makes future production better, faster or cheaper, then we have created wealth.
Services can also contribute, but then only to enhance our wellbeing or to save time.
And consumption needs to come out of this, not be the basic of the entire system.
Consumption is a good thing and it is our “reward” for being good at producing.
Consumption is not, however, what drives the economy as this GDP-madness and our enemies would like you to think.
With this entire structure in mind, what do massive amounts of stimulus; more debt (both personal and public) and a complete focus on consumption lead us? It leads to poverty and less options. The more indebt we are, the more government spends and the more we are focused on services and consumption, the less actual wealth is created even if GDP goes up. This is why GDP can be positive, but we can still get poorer. It’s all a trickery of the mind, its one big con and you have fallen for it.
This is also one of the reasons why I, and many others, could see this crisis many miles away. To anyone that understand that 1+1=2 and 2-1=1, this depression is not a surprise, its only the logical consequence of too much government, too much regulations and too much consumption on borrowed money. So this crisis cannot be over, it’s a mathematical and factual impossibility, in fact we are just in the beginning of it.
Any budget not tackling the real issue is a horrible budget.
Any politician that wants you to consume instead of produce is your enemy. Journalists and pundits that are lap-dogs to the rich and powerful should be strapped down and be worked-over with a rusty serrated bread knife.
We are being screwed by the elitists and the sooner you wake up, the sooner we can work ourselves out of this mess.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)