Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Teaching Negroes how to clean penises

I don't know how to clean my penis

Apparently the Dark Continent is filled with people (males) that have no clue how to wash “downstairs”.

In true colonial fashion The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), a division of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), spent $823,200 of economic stimulus funds in 2009 on a study by a UCLA research team to teach uncircumcised African men how to wash their genitals after having sex.

Apparently AIDS researchers have been unsuccessful in convincing most adult African men to undergo circumcision, and so the UCLA study proposes to determine whether researchers can develop an after-sex genitalia-washing regimen that they can then convince uncircumcised African men to follow.

To me this is a very strange, all throughout.

Firstly, what has circumcisions to do with AIDS? As far as I know, and from what can read online, AIDS spreads regardless of skin around the head of the penis or not. Two totally unrelated issues. Secondly I hardly see how thousands of years of civilization, even seen to countries in Africa, have missed something as obvious as to washing up or cleaning oneself. Thirdly, is this really something that can save the US’s economy? Apparently as it was a part of the stimulus…

As said, very strange.

And isn’t this racism? I am not really a politically correct individual, and I do think that the racist card is played way too often, but in this case? Teaching black people how to wash their genitals? Bordering on racism to me.

Finally I also like to point out that the only time I feel like I don’t want to keep my penis “clean” is after sex. That smell and feeling of female juices is a keeper.

In any case I hope Americans are happy knowing were their money goes. $823,200 to teach cleaning of the penis? Yes, money well spent...

The home of the Brave

After branding people that believes in the American constitution as terrorists I’ve just been waiting for the next phase of the nightmare that formally was known as USA.

In some distant dark dimension you could, maybe, feel sympathetic towards American authorities suspecting and labeling people that owns vans and people who like Ron Paul as potential terrorists. You could, in such a dark and infested place, also understand why military personnel getting back home and armed citizens is under the scrutiny of FBI. The list of suspects is very long and getting longer for each day that passes.

However, making up phony terrorists and seeing suspects everywhere isn’t enough...

Sky News
Luke Angel was reprimanded by police on both sides of the Atlantic after firing off a drunken message to the White House calling the president a "prick".

The FBI intercepted the message and contacted police in the UK who went to see the 17-year-old at his home in Silsoe, Bedfordshire.

Luke, a college student, is now on a list of people who are banned from visiting the States.

I’ve frequently called the Obamination for much worse things on this blog, so I guess this answers the question whether I could fly over the Atlantic or not. FBI have stopped by here a couple of times too, but no police have come by at my home as of yet.

Anyway, I could be perceived as threat. I do write about revolutions and that politicians should be stringed up. In the eyes of those in charge I guess this can be seen as bad, even though this is a blog and I do take things a little too far. However, a drunk teenager several thousands of miles across an ocean writing a semi-profanity? Please…

What the hell are they doing? Is this how a brave nation acts? Is this how a free society reacts to intoxicated youngsters writings?

A Bedfordshire Police spokesman said: "The individual sent an email to the White House full of abusive and threatening language.

"We were informed by the Metropolitan Police and went to see him. He said, 'Oh dear, it was me'."

Officers will take no criminal action.

Okay, so there will be no charges, no trial, no prison, and no action whatsoever. Apparently this wasn’t even a crime then, but he’s still banned. For life. Banned from visiting the US of A.

I have a lot of abusive things to say about the pickpocket in Chief and his cronies at the FBI, but in this case I think the English authorities and their strange behavior is an equally liable target.

Anyway America doesn’t exist anymore, it’s just another fallen empire among many - and this story is a proof as good as any that this statement is true.

Want a reward? Become a war-criminal!

Since the warmongering Obamination won the Nobel Peace Prize I’ve just waited for the next criminal to win an award. The Nobel Peace Prize seem to come with a label that demands a certain amount of murdered, raped and tortured - otherwise you cannot win it.

The Philadelphia-based National Constitution Centre apparently has similar reasons for handing out their medals because now the former Prime Minister Tony Blair has received the Liberty Medal for his global human rights work and commitment to international conflict resolution.

That’s nice, isn’t it? Kill enough people, start a couple of wars, destroy the economy and lie about it and you get a medal or a peace prize.

Blair who lately has been out journeying signing his new book was praised by Bill Clinton during the ceremony. Former President Clinton said Blair was a "wonderful world citizen" and "living a life worthy of this award".

Out in the real world Blair has been facing hostile crowds that have thrown shoes and eggs at him at a book-signings in Dublin and London, but facing another representative of the enemy class he gets a medal…

This is what the world has come to. The enemies of the people eat, dine, party and throw rewards at each other (all of which you pay for) while issuing “save the earth” statements. In the real world unemployment is very high, inflation runs wild and debt mountains climbs higher than ever before.

“Let ‘em eat cake”

When will it be enough? When will you stop throwing shoes and start throwing knives? When will the guillotine come out again? I guess it cannot be too far until that happens.

So ask me again why I think this world is facing a very scary scenario very soon when the world markets collapse…

Who doesn’t like sexual torture?

Oh yeah! Baby!

Almost every day we can read about and hear about new inventive ways for the power elitists to impose more and more control over our lives. One of the most common ways of doing this is to appeal to our indignation, our dubious sexual morals and how we see ‘others’.

If someone think that gay sex or golden showers are pretty disgusting, it is not that hard to convince that someone that we need legislation to hinder such acts. The same goes for pretty much everything that has to do with sex and relationships.

Throughout the years I have learned that pretty much everyone is into some kind of kinky stuff. We all have our fetishes; we all have strange erotic fantasies and with the right person/s we can live them out. Frankly the ones being content with the missionary varied with doggy once a week never feeling the need to try something else and never testing perversities make up a very, very small minority.

Strange then that so many feel indignation and get morally outraged whenever something “out of the norm” gets depicted in the news. Or is this maybe the real reason? We feel slight disgust with ourselves or want to hide our own perversities so we attack those that do the same?

Whatever the reason I cannot understand how anyone can let authorities in general and media in particular again and again undermine our personal liberties with stories of ‘strange’ sexacts. You can almost forgive them for using rapes, pedophilia and such in this manner, but consensual adults have fun? What’s up with that?

So it is not surprising to learn about today’s big story in Swedish papers. Apparently a 32-year-old man (age is important when there’s a difference between the two) charged with assault after having violent sex with a teenager in a case testing how much sexual violence is legally permitted in Sweden between consenting partners.

The 16-year-old girl (15 is the legal age in Sweden) came in contact with the man through a sexually-themed website and later signed a “slave contract” in which she consented to being “used, abused and thoroughly humiliated”.

During their sexual encounter, the girl ALLOWED herself to be locked in a cage and have clamps attached to her breasts.

Police were alerted to the alleged assault when a relative of the teen noticed she had bruises all over her body.

The court shouldn’t have anything to do with a case like this and we should all be out in the streets demonstrating against this horrible act of autocracy. Journalists should be defending people’s rights to have whatever sexual act they want. But no. Of course not.

With the risk of getting charged I can honestly say that I’ve done much worse things and I have, myself, been subjected to worse things. And having bruises after sex is so normal I would even argue that a sexual encounter that doesn’t end with bruising is equal to bad sex. Of course you can avoid such things with acts that don’t really involve touching like stroking a feather over a body or masturbating in front of each other, but a penetration party with pretty “normal” sex almost always lead to at least one or two bruises.

Having clamps on breasts or in other places are very common and so is some smacking, spanking etc. So what is the problem here? Why does the court feel it necessary to bring such a case to trial?

Well first it is the “age-thing”. A 16y old girl shouldn’t have sexual desires. Even in our time and age women’s sexuality is almost a taboo subject. And having desires that borders to torture with an elderly man? Oh… that’s horrible.

Secondly - and this is really the important part - authorities like to show us who’s in charge. They cannot let us get away with personal feelings and have our own way of doing things. They want us to feel ashamed and being uncertain about what we can and cannot do. This is how they govern. They want us afraid and they want us feeling monitored.

You should be outraged that the court is taking two consenting peoples sexact to trial. This is the ultimate test of despotism, if they get away with this, they can get away with anything. If you let them dictate your sexlife you have lost.

So if any female (couples, or groups) out there want to test exactly the thing mentioned in the news about this case, please let me know. I’ll be there in a heartbeat, and will even do worse. I like everything with sex. Everything from soft kissing in candlelight’s to rough cage-spanking in the dungeon. I will never let anyone tell me otherwise, and neither should you.