Another example how completely out of touch the elitists are and how horrid the justice system works is the case of Per-Anders Pettersson in Sweden. This hero, one of the few left in the world, saved an old woman from a vicious attack and is now getting to pay damages as well as the luxury of getting thrown in jail. How about that?
Mr Pettersson noticed a woman getting savagely attacked, he took his jack and hit the assailant two times, as it were saved the females life. The criminal ended up in a hospital with cerebral damages, the poor sod. Laughable enough Swedish courts decided to sentence Mr Pettersson to one year imprisonment and SEK 50 000 in fines to be paid to… the attacker?
And even more hilarious, the actual criminal got away with; yeah you guessed it, not even a slap on the wrist. No prison-time, not even a slight reprimand.
I seldom get upset anymore, the powers that be cannot surprise me anymore. I’ve seen through all the trickery and scams, but this is a “burn down the courthouse”-kind of a situation.
I wonder why the woman didn't get thrown in jail for the crime of being strangled?
People cannot smoke without learning how "evil" it is, alcohol comes with warning labels and horrible taxes, we need to drive with seatbelts and the government sneak around and prod through every online movement. And according to the righteous that rule us we are all pedophiles as well as not mature enough to vote about the biggest change for the European Union since its start-up. All this at the same time as the elitists themselves perform gluttony, shine from greed and act out the rest of the sins all paid for with tax money.
When have you idiots out there had enough? How long are you going to bend over and take it like the raped bitches the elitists have changed you into?
And the powers that be shouldn’t really dismiss these sorts of things too lightly. Mr. Pettersson, just like me, is from a region in middle of Sweden called Dalarna. Pretty much every rebellion in the history of my birth nation, including the one that eventually formed the country back in the 16th century originated there. I don’t think this will be enough to spark another pitchfork run at the capital; however, this is another drop of water in that soon to be overfilled glass.
Something is really wrong in the world; I know what it is and what to do about it. When will you figure it out?
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Alternate universe of the righteous
Even before I left my long service within the belly of the beast I was more aware how the real world works than most around me. Maybe it was my very humble upbringing, maybe it was some epiphanies on the road, but I usually blame my intellect for seeing through the entire BS that makes up the system.
To be a more ordinary citizen outside all the trickery and dealings of the political class means you see things and talk to people in a different way. You’re no longer trying to win votes, you don’t need to make deals that makes the stomach hurt anymore, and you can relax and call people what they really are, even those you formerly associated yourself with. To be able to look in a mirror without feeling shame is a joyful occasion every time once you let go of the shadiness.
But having that in-depth perception and still knowing many of those on up high mixed with a good education, a globetrotter’s outlook and, at least according to myself, having a pretty smart brain makes the whole picture very bleak indeed.
There are two things all people should know, but don’t. And the problem is you can’t really tell anyone either. Some don’t believe you, others lack the smartness or the proper education, but for the most part people simply don’t care. So what I’m about to tell ya isn’t something you can agree with or discard automatically. This is something you need to learn for yourself. I can only give the hint and the basics, whatever you do with it, is up to you.
Firstly there is an absolute soap opera going on within all political bodies. Yes, there are intrigues and deals being made in pretty much every company or organization. Even harmless institutions like the boy-scouts or the local knitting-club have their pecking order and inner politics. However, with the political sphere things go into overdrive. Most of you probably understand and maybe even feel it to be necessary to have pacts and come to some kind of agreement, how else would we get to be governed? But what you don’t understand is how deep this really goes. The whole thing can probably be summed up with the realization that not a single one of the high and mighty would think twice about sacrificing their own grandma at the altar of the unclean one in order to get money, prestige and a seat at parliament. Most of the elitists I refer to would deny this emphatically, and pretty honestly at that, you see, they don’t really understand it themselves.
So think of the worst soapy TV-drama you know, take that times ten but leave the murders out (for the most part), and there you have it. That’s politics. And when you think of how these people live, dine, travel, buy suits and use taxi for our tax money, things start to unravel.
This is the first part. I know most of you are nodding your heads, feeling that you’ve found a soul mate that also hate politicians, but that’s the thing, 99% of you who read this do not really get it. It’s much worse than you think, it’s more despotic, more tyrannical and more out there than you can imagine.
Why? Because of the system, the politicians among themselves and the very basic foundation of democracy together with the very notion of having a ruling elite drive everything in this direction. It has always been like this, and always will.
Everything in this cancerous world is connected with agreements, voting processes, bribes, and lobbyists and so on. The only real try to come to terms with this was the American constitution. Sadly that has deteriorated into nothing but a piece of paper hardly worth wiping yourself with.
The second thing I would like you to understand is how far away in a distant land our elected exist. They exist in an alternate reality with completely different set of rules, and with no concept of how those beneath live. Now and again “a man of the people” arises to power, wearing a genuine smile, having worked at a factory he seems to be honest. There are three ways such a person can react to interacting with politicians. He can become one of them, which is very common given time. He can react with apathy when he understands how deeply rooted that smelly brown stuff really is - which either makes him an puppet since he lack the urge and power to think and work for himself or he leaves with his tail between the legs. The third way is that he becomes very frightened and scared he literally runs away and either becomes an eremite or puts on a ten-foil hat.
You only need to look at how the power elite acts come to the European Union to see how oblivious the ruling class is. Countries that have referendums need to hold them again and again until they get the “right result”. Mostly they skip those altogether since they know a popular vote wouldn’t give them the desired result. Don’t get me wrong, I’m no fan of the voting process, but when so large chunks of the populace is clearly against something, and politicians drive it through anyway, that’s not really democracy and it goes to show how clueless the elitists are. Worse still, the real reason they refuse is not for a possible “wrong” result, instead it’s the über-mentality. They know better. Their world is a place of perfection; the lower beings need to follow. Bow down before us; we are the ones in charge.
This most of you actually see, at least partly, but you don’t have the full picture. As an example people think things might change if they vote for another party, that’s totally wrong. The only thing you do when you vote for any of the established parties is that you vote for the system. Nothing more, nothing less.
Think of it this way. Imagine a picture, in that picture are all the figure-heads of all the parties you can normally vote for. They stand together side by side, smiling, having had a nice dinner together last night, which you paid for. From left to right, they are all there, in the same picture. Below them is a couple of lines of text, and we’ll get back to that in a moment. For now focus on those representatives of politics in that picture. Now imagine someone taking a scissor and cuts them apart, still the same picture, but now separated into several parts.
They then use that same out-cut piece to put on their respective website. And you can read how horrible the opposition is and how fantastic the country will be with a couple of percent higher or lower tax.
Now, put them all together again in that first whole picture and read the text that will say:
We all want you to vote
We all want to rule you
We all want to control you
We all live on your money
People often argue that there is a degree difference in hell, and well, sure, they do have a miniscule point. I rather have a “right”-government because they understand economics a tad better and let us make one or two more decisions by ourselves than the substitute. But is it really a choice? If you have an option between taking a bullet to the head or swallow poison, is that equivalent to a real choice between two different alternatives?
Another good sign how totally out of touch our elected frauds are is when there is a crisis in the economy – somehow they always find a way to increase their own salaries and benefits while urging the rest of us to save and cut back on our salaries. At the very same time they lay off teachers and nurses they travel in a jet to some other country for a meet-and-great with other politicians talking about the scam of global warming. After they have flown back, emitting lots of fumes on the way, they say they had a breakthrough in negotiations while some crony keeps firing doctors behind the curtain. The “breakthrough” is, of course, higher taxes so people that are already losing their jobs need to pay more to the bottomless abyss of the treasury.
I can go on with lots of other examples, but to summarize, if we put these two facts together, there’s no hope for your country as long as you continue to fall for the trickery they bestow you. There is a built in function in politics which makes it impossible to end up anywhere else but in statism. Some would argue its fascism, and yes, you can name it that. Others would call it socialism, I don’t fully agree with that, even if you can see those traits as well. No political system can withstand this inevitable end-result, with the exception of libertarianism. The closer to liberty and capitalism your government is, the longer they can postpone the unavoidable, but in the end the greed, the power struggles and the very existence of an elitist class will end up in the totalitarian nightmare we are very close to today.
We have been sort of lucky in the west during the past 50 years or so, having a form of market economy and keeping social experimentations on half-speed. There have been a shift lately though and with the current financial crisis, that they have created, the speed has increased.
We are living in a very interesting time, it may be a turning point were more of you come to grips with I just told you, but in all likelihood we will see more and more of the same crap and soon armed and bloody rebellion. And when people walk down the street with pitchforks and torches, the elitists will still discard them as radical elements, racists or anarchists that don’t know what’s best for them. That’s how they work, that’s how they think.
Normally you are just a pedophile, a file sharing criminal or a money maker for their projects, but if you really complain, than you go from just ‘evil’ to be a target practice for the military and police.
It’s hard to see a way out of this mess other than an complete awakening of the people, but that will never happen, so what will we have instead…
To be a more ordinary citizen outside all the trickery and dealings of the political class means you see things and talk to people in a different way. You’re no longer trying to win votes, you don’t need to make deals that makes the stomach hurt anymore, and you can relax and call people what they really are, even those you formerly associated yourself with. To be able to look in a mirror without feeling shame is a joyful occasion every time once you let go of the shadiness.
But having that in-depth perception and still knowing many of those on up high mixed with a good education, a globetrotter’s outlook and, at least according to myself, having a pretty smart brain makes the whole picture very bleak indeed.
There are two things all people should know, but don’t. And the problem is you can’t really tell anyone either. Some don’t believe you, others lack the smartness or the proper education, but for the most part people simply don’t care. So what I’m about to tell ya isn’t something you can agree with or discard automatically. This is something you need to learn for yourself. I can only give the hint and the basics, whatever you do with it, is up to you.
Firstly there is an absolute soap opera going on within all political bodies. Yes, there are intrigues and deals being made in pretty much every company or organization. Even harmless institutions like the boy-scouts or the local knitting-club have their pecking order and inner politics. However, with the political sphere things go into overdrive. Most of you probably understand and maybe even feel it to be necessary to have pacts and come to some kind of agreement, how else would we get to be governed? But what you don’t understand is how deep this really goes. The whole thing can probably be summed up with the realization that not a single one of the high and mighty would think twice about sacrificing their own grandma at the altar of the unclean one in order to get money, prestige and a seat at parliament. Most of the elitists I refer to would deny this emphatically, and pretty honestly at that, you see, they don’t really understand it themselves.
So think of the worst soapy TV-drama you know, take that times ten but leave the murders out (for the most part), and there you have it. That’s politics. And when you think of how these people live, dine, travel, buy suits and use taxi for our tax money, things start to unravel.
This is the first part. I know most of you are nodding your heads, feeling that you’ve found a soul mate that also hate politicians, but that’s the thing, 99% of you who read this do not really get it. It’s much worse than you think, it’s more despotic, more tyrannical and more out there than you can imagine.
Why? Because of the system, the politicians among themselves and the very basic foundation of democracy together with the very notion of having a ruling elite drive everything in this direction. It has always been like this, and always will.
Everything in this cancerous world is connected with agreements, voting processes, bribes, and lobbyists and so on. The only real try to come to terms with this was the American constitution. Sadly that has deteriorated into nothing but a piece of paper hardly worth wiping yourself with.
The second thing I would like you to understand is how far away in a distant land our elected exist. They exist in an alternate reality with completely different set of rules, and with no concept of how those beneath live. Now and again “a man of the people” arises to power, wearing a genuine smile, having worked at a factory he seems to be honest. There are three ways such a person can react to interacting with politicians. He can become one of them, which is very common given time. He can react with apathy when he understands how deeply rooted that smelly brown stuff really is - which either makes him an puppet since he lack the urge and power to think and work for himself or he leaves with his tail between the legs. The third way is that he becomes very frightened and scared he literally runs away and either becomes an eremite or puts on a ten-foil hat.
You only need to look at how the power elite acts come to the European Union to see how oblivious the ruling class is. Countries that have referendums need to hold them again and again until they get the “right result”. Mostly they skip those altogether since they know a popular vote wouldn’t give them the desired result. Don’t get me wrong, I’m no fan of the voting process, but when so large chunks of the populace is clearly against something, and politicians drive it through anyway, that’s not really democracy and it goes to show how clueless the elitists are. Worse still, the real reason they refuse is not for a possible “wrong” result, instead it’s the über-mentality. They know better. Their world is a place of perfection; the lower beings need to follow. Bow down before us; we are the ones in charge.
This most of you actually see, at least partly, but you don’t have the full picture. As an example people think things might change if they vote for another party, that’s totally wrong. The only thing you do when you vote for any of the established parties is that you vote for the system. Nothing more, nothing less.
Think of it this way. Imagine a picture, in that picture are all the figure-heads of all the parties you can normally vote for. They stand together side by side, smiling, having had a nice dinner together last night, which you paid for. From left to right, they are all there, in the same picture. Below them is a couple of lines of text, and we’ll get back to that in a moment. For now focus on those representatives of politics in that picture. Now imagine someone taking a scissor and cuts them apart, still the same picture, but now separated into several parts.
They then use that same out-cut piece to put on their respective website. And you can read how horrible the opposition is and how fantastic the country will be with a couple of percent higher or lower tax.
Now, put them all together again in that first whole picture and read the text that will say:
We all want you to vote
We all want to rule you
We all want to control you
We all live on your money
People often argue that there is a degree difference in hell, and well, sure, they do have a miniscule point. I rather have a “right”-government because they understand economics a tad better and let us make one or two more decisions by ourselves than the substitute. But is it really a choice? If you have an option between taking a bullet to the head or swallow poison, is that equivalent to a real choice between two different alternatives?
Another good sign how totally out of touch our elected frauds are is when there is a crisis in the economy – somehow they always find a way to increase their own salaries and benefits while urging the rest of us to save and cut back on our salaries. At the very same time they lay off teachers and nurses they travel in a jet to some other country for a meet-and-great with other politicians talking about the scam of global warming. After they have flown back, emitting lots of fumes on the way, they say they had a breakthrough in negotiations while some crony keeps firing doctors behind the curtain. The “breakthrough” is, of course, higher taxes so people that are already losing their jobs need to pay more to the bottomless abyss of the treasury.
I can go on with lots of other examples, but to summarize, if we put these two facts together, there’s no hope for your country as long as you continue to fall for the trickery they bestow you. There is a built in function in politics which makes it impossible to end up anywhere else but in statism. Some would argue its fascism, and yes, you can name it that. Others would call it socialism, I don’t fully agree with that, even if you can see those traits as well. No political system can withstand this inevitable end-result, with the exception of libertarianism. The closer to liberty and capitalism your government is, the longer they can postpone the unavoidable, but in the end the greed, the power struggles and the very existence of an elitist class will end up in the totalitarian nightmare we are very close to today.
We have been sort of lucky in the west during the past 50 years or so, having a form of market economy and keeping social experimentations on half-speed. There have been a shift lately though and with the current financial crisis, that they have created, the speed has increased.
We are living in a very interesting time, it may be a turning point were more of you come to grips with I just told you, but in all likelihood we will see more and more of the same crap and soon armed and bloody rebellion. And when people walk down the street with pitchforks and torches, the elitists will still discard them as radical elements, racists or anarchists that don’t know what’s best for them. That’s how they work, that’s how they think.
Normally you are just a pedophile, a file sharing criminal or a money maker for their projects, but if you really complain, than you go from just ‘evil’ to be a target practice for the military and police.
It’s hard to see a way out of this mess other than an complete awakening of the people, but that will never happen, so what will we have instead…
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Political calisthenics
Another step towards the formation of the überstate of Europe was taken today and we can only wait for confirmation that the highly pressured Czech president Vaclav Klaus have signed the European Union's Lisbon Treaty. With this done one of the last remaining obstacles for our enemies have been eliminated and now the aerobicizing trickery really starts. The rush for the very well paid positions as puppets masters of Europe is a fun game for the elitists. In this little scheme they can make shadowy deals, mumble behind curtains, and make pacts that would make any reality show green from envy. In essence the very core of everything that is wrong with the world and consequently pure heaven for the powers that be.
If president Klaus have sign or soon will sign we have, among others, a new European Council president and a new foreign policy chief to be elected. As soon as the smoke from all the plotting for positions has cleared that is.
You can hear them can’t you?
“Give Xxxx Xxxx the position as foreign policy chief and we back your fascist internet proposal”.
“Help us win another exception from free trade and we vote for you as president”
“If you vote for me I promise to hire your next of kin as my chief of staff”
And this is the normal topics of discussions that we know goes on. No surprises here, but what about more potent threats and very hellish dealings? Oh, yeah, I do hear those as well…
“With me as president you’re set for life and those pesky Turkish Muslim idiots will never become members “
“A vote for me as Foreign policy chief will assure that our plan to introduce a new world currency will come to be very soon”
“My banking buddies have a very lucrative job for you a couple of years from now if you vote for me. By the way, there is a new Mercedes out in the parking lot, here’s the key”
To be honest, we don’t really know where this will end up or what the result will be, we may get lucky and things turns towards the positive side of things. However, the track-record and the seedy underbelly of bureaucracy that make up the core of Brussels speak for itself. Nothing good will ever come out of this and the best we can hope for is that the talk about “peace” holds for another decade or so. Oh, wait, aren’t there a couple of illegal wars going on in the Middle East? What was I thinking…?
If president Klaus have sign or soon will sign we have, among others, a new European Council president and a new foreign policy chief to be elected. As soon as the smoke from all the plotting for positions has cleared that is.
You can hear them can’t you?
“Give Xxxx Xxxx the position as foreign policy chief and we back your fascist internet proposal”.
“Help us win another exception from free trade and we vote for you as president”
“If you vote for me I promise to hire your next of kin as my chief of staff”
And this is the normal topics of discussions that we know goes on. No surprises here, but what about more potent threats and very hellish dealings? Oh, yeah, I do hear those as well…
“With me as president you’re set for life and those pesky Turkish Muslim idiots will never become members “
“A vote for me as Foreign policy chief will assure that our plan to introduce a new world currency will come to be very soon”
“My banking buddies have a very lucrative job for you a couple of years from now if you vote for me. By the way, there is a new Mercedes out in the parking lot, here’s the key”
To be honest, we don’t really know where this will end up or what the result will be, we may get lucky and things turns towards the positive side of things. However, the track-record and the seedy underbelly of bureaucracy that make up the core of Brussels speak for itself. Nothing good will ever come out of this and the best we can hope for is that the talk about “peace” holds for another decade or so. Oh, wait, aren’t there a couple of illegal wars going on in the Middle East? What was I thinking…?
Another journalist murdered by government
The Mexican government, that continues to wage a war against its own people, has many thousands of lives on their bloody hands. Among all these victims that should be alive are several journalists. Another one has now been found dead.
I’m not a big fan of journalists in general; mostly they are a very useless bunch of lazy pro-government morons. However, in the fight against a murderess regime even a journalist rank higher than any official. I feel sorry for that person’s family and hope that the Mexican people soon have had enough and rise up against their oppressors.
Just legalize it already!
I’m not a big fan of journalists in general; mostly they are a very useless bunch of lazy pro-government morons. However, in the fight against a murderess regime even a journalist rank higher than any official. I feel sorry for that person’s family and hope that the Mexican people soon have had enough and rise up against their oppressors.
Just legalize it already!
One out of three Swiney cases
Apparently a third person has died from Piggy flu in Sweden, but still the relevant statistics are ignored. Like the fact that last year, which was a very mild flu year, 100+ people was confirmed dead in Sweden from flu. Other years, like the year 2000 the number was close 1400 confirmed deaths. This should then be correlated to 3 deaths during around half a year of exposing us for the Swiney variant. True that the real flu season has just begun, but the mortality rate is very low so far.
That the death rate is around 0.007%, which is lower than any normal flu, out of the infected is also ignored, as is the fact that the symptoms for the vast majority of infected is very mild.
Media like to scare us that so many children and young and healthy get infected. This is only partly true. It has happened before that a flu strain targets more of the young than others, so for instance was the case the flu season of 2003-2004 of the A/H3 strain. H1N1 usually target more healthy groups, so its no real surprise this is the case now either. Media also still claims that obese people are more at risk; this is not only false, the opposite is true. Statistics from America, with a 70% obese populace only 20% of the dead is obese. Consequently fatty blobby people seem to be much more protected something media refuse to write about.
Another fact that kind of get hidden is that most of the dead, it is very hard to find any exception, have had heart troubles, liver diseases and similar problems which would most likely have'd them killed whatever flu strain they pick up.
But here is a statistic I’m hoping very much for. The third confirmed dead was a politician, so if this continues, that 1 out of 3 dead belong to the enemy class of politics, I haft to say: GO FLU! GO!
Although a very easy way to go for any politician, I would prefer the short drop with dangling for ten minutes or a couple of days in the dungeon with Spike the Jailor; this is still something to root for.
That the death rate is around 0.007%, which is lower than any normal flu, out of the infected is also ignored, as is the fact that the symptoms for the vast majority of infected is very mild.
Media like to scare us that so many children and young and healthy get infected. This is only partly true. It has happened before that a flu strain targets more of the young than others, so for instance was the case the flu season of 2003-2004 of the A/H3 strain. H1N1 usually target more healthy groups, so its no real surprise this is the case now either. Media also still claims that obese people are more at risk; this is not only false, the opposite is true. Statistics from America, with a 70% obese populace only 20% of the dead is obese. Consequently fatty blobby people seem to be much more protected something media refuse to write about.
Another fact that kind of get hidden is that most of the dead, it is very hard to find any exception, have had heart troubles, liver diseases and similar problems which would most likely have'd them killed whatever flu strain they pick up.
But here is a statistic I’m hoping very much for. The third confirmed dead was a politician, so if this continues, that 1 out of 3 dead belong to the enemy class of politics, I haft to say: GO FLU! GO!
Although a very easy way to go for any politician, I would prefer the short drop with dangling for ten minutes or a couple of days in the dungeon with Spike the Jailor; this is still something to root for.
Monday, November 2, 2009
What a waste of tax money
Why do you need a fast internet connection? The answer is you want to download and upload stuff online and you want to be able to do that as fast as possible. If you cannot share files, watch movies, download porn, upload music, see shows or play online games, then the fastness of the line have very little significance.
To read a newspaper, chat with your friends or Google for information about that itching feeling between your legs there is hardly any need for anything faster than 1Mbit/s.
But in the fictitious world of the righteous control-freaks that makes up our legislative branch, we somehow need 100Mbit/s. why?
They have outlawed downloading and uploading pretty much everything. Our emails, chat-conversations and online communities are under surveillance by government agencies and super computers. If you visit government sites you can get tracked or even get your computer searched. If you visit a porn site you may stumble across a naked picture of a 17y old and consequently become a pedophile. If you write the wrong words or phrases, wherever you write those for whatever reason, you’ll forever get branded by the thought police. If you write a blog or manage an information-site that is highly critical of those in charge you get visits from Intelligence Agencies and an increasing number of politicians want to license or even ban such nuisances.
And since Intelligence Agencies and governments share information with each other about their online surveillance, there is a chance, although I admit a small one, that you can get branded as a terrorist. And since you know that certain countries can throw you in jail and torture you for less, the self-censorship for this and all the rest mentioned above becomes more and more close to total.
And for us that pay attention and know how the thought police work, we know they are just getting started. There will be new laws, new exceptions, new agencies, expanded authority; more employees set to monitor us and so on. It’s just a matter of time before the first bloggers get banned, alternative news sites get shut down and search-engines are hindered from linking to the “wrong” information.
So by Beelzebub’s horns why do we need 100Mbit/s or faster? The answer is we don’t.
But Swedish politicians (and elected frauds in other countries) want to build, expand, increase and ‘give us’ such speedy cables. Another huge waste of our tax money. It doesn’t even sound good. Anyone with the slightest inkling of how internet works are going “Pffffff…” and wondering what the überclass’ angle is.
“Here you have a very fast internet connection. With it you can’t do anything without us watching you and if you break any of the 3 845 999 192 laws we have set up we’ll come down on you like the hammer of God. And since you are the one paying for the cable we give you, and you pay for the thought police that monitor you, the agencies that will break down your door and for the court that will judge you, we do hope you have a nice day”
What a bunch of clueless, overzealous fascist cunts!
Wars and rebellions have started for less, but you lazy stupid people out there will do nothing to stop this madness now will you? How long will you bend over and take it?
I’ve stopped caring myself. Let them come. There is no money saved, I don’t own anything of value, I have no family and frankly I’d love the opportunity to tell a judge where to stick his head. So if any of you out there have any plans of blowing up parliament on Thursday or any of the sorts, please let me know.
To read a newspaper, chat with your friends or Google for information about that itching feeling between your legs there is hardly any need for anything faster than 1Mbit/s.
But in the fictitious world of the righteous control-freaks that makes up our legislative branch, we somehow need 100Mbit/s. why?
They have outlawed downloading and uploading pretty much everything. Our emails, chat-conversations and online communities are under surveillance by government agencies and super computers. If you visit government sites you can get tracked or even get your computer searched. If you visit a porn site you may stumble across a naked picture of a 17y old and consequently become a pedophile. If you write the wrong words or phrases, wherever you write those for whatever reason, you’ll forever get branded by the thought police. If you write a blog or manage an information-site that is highly critical of those in charge you get visits from Intelligence Agencies and an increasing number of politicians want to license or even ban such nuisances.
And since Intelligence Agencies and governments share information with each other about their online surveillance, there is a chance, although I admit a small one, that you can get branded as a terrorist. And since you know that certain countries can throw you in jail and torture you for less, the self-censorship for this and all the rest mentioned above becomes more and more close to total.
And for us that pay attention and know how the thought police work, we know they are just getting started. There will be new laws, new exceptions, new agencies, expanded authority; more employees set to monitor us and so on. It’s just a matter of time before the first bloggers get banned, alternative news sites get shut down and search-engines are hindered from linking to the “wrong” information.
So by Beelzebub’s horns why do we need 100Mbit/s or faster? The answer is we don’t.
But Swedish politicians (and elected frauds in other countries) want to build, expand, increase and ‘give us’ such speedy cables. Another huge waste of our tax money. It doesn’t even sound good. Anyone with the slightest inkling of how internet works are going “Pffffff…” and wondering what the überclass’ angle is.
“Here you have a very fast internet connection. With it you can’t do anything without us watching you and if you break any of the 3 845 999 192 laws we have set up we’ll come down on you like the hammer of God. And since you are the one paying for the cable we give you, and you pay for the thought police that monitor you, the agencies that will break down your door and for the court that will judge you, we do hope you have a nice day”
What a bunch of clueless, overzealous fascist cunts!
Wars and rebellions have started for less, but you lazy stupid people out there will do nothing to stop this madness now will you? How long will you bend over and take it?
I’ve stopped caring myself. Let them come. There is no money saved, I don’t own anything of value, I have no family and frankly I’d love the opportunity to tell a judge where to stick his head. So if any of you out there have any plans of blowing up parliament on Thursday or any of the sorts, please let me know.
I’m going pedophile
It’s going to be illegal to LOOK at kiddy porn in Sweden. Although I suspected as much, I cannot help wondering how stupid the legislative branch and the rest of the idiots really are.
Here are some very relevant questions about this idiocy:
Who is going to decide what pornographic material of a minor is? If two adolescent persons take pictures of each other, have they broken this law if they watch the pictures? If I have pictures of me very young, naked in the bathtub, which I have, and someone watches it, does that render ten years of imprisonment?
And how can you really know it is “illegal” porn you’re watching? I mean, it’s not really uncommon to see “Lolitas” at a porno-site having a shaved middle area and pigtails getting gangfucked by a bunch of men in an alley. She could be 15 or 25, how the hell are you supposed to know? If it is a pretty professional site or if the movie is made by a respectable firm, yeah, sure you can assume it’s a legal movie, but do you really know?
And there are lots of preteen models for rent out there, and I don’t mean for porn or naked stuff. Pick up any catalogue with children clothes or check out a vacation ad, is that kiddy porn? If not, who decides?
And why only on picture? If I happen to walk past a tasty 7y old on the streets and think unclean things, I’m a criminal? If I see my child naked, have I committed a crime? Where has these people thought up a line!?
And maybe the most relevant question of all; How in the blazing inferno of hell can anyone decide what is child pornography without watching a lot of it!?
I essence, police officers are going to jail because they are watching kiddy stuff in order to catch the really bad guys.
This is so ridiculous that I’ve decided that I don’t care. If it’s a crime to happen to stumble upon a child porn site or picture while roaming the net or if it’s a crime just watching a picture of someone underage, then lock me up now. In other words, in the eyes of the righteous maniacs that makes laws I will from now on be, or at least a possible be, a pedophile.
Idiots!
Or are they really idiots? One can suspect this is just another move in order to control our lives and what we see and do.
Here are some very relevant questions about this idiocy:
Who is going to decide what pornographic material of a minor is? If two adolescent persons take pictures of each other, have they broken this law if they watch the pictures? If I have pictures of me very young, naked in the bathtub, which I have, and someone watches it, does that render ten years of imprisonment?
And how can you really know it is “illegal” porn you’re watching? I mean, it’s not really uncommon to see “Lolitas” at a porno-site having a shaved middle area and pigtails getting gangfucked by a bunch of men in an alley. She could be 15 or 25, how the hell are you supposed to know? If it is a pretty professional site or if the movie is made by a respectable firm, yeah, sure you can assume it’s a legal movie, but do you really know?
And there are lots of preteen models for rent out there, and I don’t mean for porn or naked stuff. Pick up any catalogue with children clothes or check out a vacation ad, is that kiddy porn? If not, who decides?
And why only on picture? If I happen to walk past a tasty 7y old on the streets and think unclean things, I’m a criminal? If I see my child naked, have I committed a crime? Where has these people thought up a line!?
And maybe the most relevant question of all; How in the blazing inferno of hell can anyone decide what is child pornography without watching a lot of it!?
I essence, police officers are going to jail because they are watching kiddy stuff in order to catch the really bad guys.
This is so ridiculous that I’ve decided that I don’t care. If it’s a crime to happen to stumble upon a child porn site or picture while roaming the net or if it’s a crime just watching a picture of someone underage, then lock me up now. In other words, in the eyes of the righteous maniacs that makes laws I will from now on be, or at least a possible be, a pedophile.
Idiots!
Or are they really idiots? One can suspect this is just another move in order to control our lives and what we see and do.
Sunday, November 1, 2009
qu'ils mangent de la brioche
The stage is set in the US. The plays have been made; all that is left now is those final straws. So far the American public has taken the non-violent approach with rallies and shouting-matches at town-hall meetings. However, this will sooner or later change. If they really knew how utterly screwed they’d been there would already be banksters and politicians dangling from lamp-posts.
The second American Revolution is on the way, and as usual media is oblivious.
The biggest heist of all time have just been carried out wherein banks first made trillions of dollars in fictitious scams, then when things turned south they handed over the bill to the taxpayers. Now they are using all that money to buy other companies, other banks and setting up off-shore holdings or saving it for the near future. One can only assume that once the US economy really collapses they will step in with all this stolen money and buy all the assets and real-estate for a penny on the dollar. It is hard not to stand in awe before this scheme, it’s so arch-villainy, so sinister in its core that nothing in human history comes even close.
To no surprise the American military have, or are about to, deploy over 400 000 troops on home-soil, while the police in conjuncture with boy scouts and many volunteer organizations are preparing to face libertarians, Ron Paul supporters and constitutionalists (i.e. the “terrorists”) on the streets.
One of the last remaining hopes for the republic was the Audit-the-fed bill that could have saved both the economy in the long-term and given the public the scape-goats they want to trial and blame. However, to no real surprise, that bill is now cut down and stripped of all real content so its purpose has evaporated. Goldman Sachs and Fed lobbyists have worked their magic to cover up their robbery and malicious intent.
All the while the lies continue to cometh and president Obuma cannot have a single campaign promise left that he hasn’t yet broken. Debts continue to sour, unemployment is now at Depression levels and more crashes are to be expected. The protests that has been widespread is put down in condescending tones and the protesters are getting to be blamed to be everything from racists thugs with swastikas to ignorant mobs controlled by a right-wing news station.
This cannot end well.
The only thing that surprises me is that there haven’t been more people going postal.
But sooner or later those sparks will ignite the flames. It’s just a matter of time.
We will probably haft to wait for the commercial real-estate collapse, a stock-market crash or something of the sort before people have had enough, but things are very volatile at the moment and if some careless high ranking official start saying “they can eat cake” about unemployed starving citizens there will be a “off with their heads”-response before the elected frauds knows what hit them.
A while back there was some talk about US getting to be divided into smaller parts into the future, I find that notion highly probable. Succession movements are very strong in many states and you know that when politicians, as always afraid of not being re-elected, start talking in those terms, there’s something really tangible.
History is in the making, right now. Media is missing it, but I’m hoping some of you are paying attention out there. The second American Revolution has already begun and just as with the first one, you cannot be surprised if the notion of rebellion spreads to other countries (Cough cough, UK, cough...).
There is really only one thing that may save the tricksters now, a large terrorist attack and/or another war to keep people busy...
The second American Revolution is on the way, and as usual media is oblivious.
The biggest heist of all time have just been carried out wherein banks first made trillions of dollars in fictitious scams, then when things turned south they handed over the bill to the taxpayers. Now they are using all that money to buy other companies, other banks and setting up off-shore holdings or saving it for the near future. One can only assume that once the US economy really collapses they will step in with all this stolen money and buy all the assets and real-estate for a penny on the dollar. It is hard not to stand in awe before this scheme, it’s so arch-villainy, so sinister in its core that nothing in human history comes even close.
To no surprise the American military have, or are about to, deploy over 400 000 troops on home-soil, while the police in conjuncture with boy scouts and many volunteer organizations are preparing to face libertarians, Ron Paul supporters and constitutionalists (i.e. the “terrorists”) on the streets.
One of the last remaining hopes for the republic was the Audit-the-fed bill that could have saved both the economy in the long-term and given the public the scape-goats they want to trial and blame. However, to no real surprise, that bill is now cut down and stripped of all real content so its purpose has evaporated. Goldman Sachs and Fed lobbyists have worked their magic to cover up their robbery and malicious intent.
All the while the lies continue to cometh and president Obuma cannot have a single campaign promise left that he hasn’t yet broken. Debts continue to sour, unemployment is now at Depression levels and more crashes are to be expected. The protests that has been widespread is put down in condescending tones and the protesters are getting to be blamed to be everything from racists thugs with swastikas to ignorant mobs controlled by a right-wing news station.
This cannot end well.
The only thing that surprises me is that there haven’t been more people going postal.
But sooner or later those sparks will ignite the flames. It’s just a matter of time.
We will probably haft to wait for the commercial real-estate collapse, a stock-market crash or something of the sort before people have had enough, but things are very volatile at the moment and if some careless high ranking official start saying “they can eat cake” about unemployed starving citizens there will be a “off with their heads”-response before the elected frauds knows what hit them.
A while back there was some talk about US getting to be divided into smaller parts into the future, I find that notion highly probable. Succession movements are very strong in many states and you know that when politicians, as always afraid of not being re-elected, start talking in those terms, there’s something really tangible.
History is in the making, right now. Media is missing it, but I’m hoping some of you are paying attention out there. The second American Revolution has already begun and just as with the first one, you cannot be surprised if the notion of rebellion spreads to other countries (Cough cough, UK, cough...).
There is really only one thing that may save the tricksters now, a large terrorist attack and/or another war to keep people busy...
Braaaaains...
The Swedish central banks acts of financial terrorism seem to be working. The Swedish populace is borrowing like crazies. That now is the worst possible time, certainly in my lifetime, to borrow money and even worst of a time to buy fixed assets like housing or real-estate is ignored by clueless Swedes.
Minus derivatives but plus higher debt-GDP ratio the similarities with the US housing-bubble is striking. You need to go back hundreds of years to find worse economic decisions for the Swedish economy than that of the current central banksters’ madness. They have ruined the economy and the longer they are allowed to keep this up, the worse hang-over we are going to get.
The central bank should be leveled to the ground and everyone working at this horrible institution should be trialed for treason and locked away for the rest of their lives.
Even if you, the idiotic citizens, should share much of the blame, comes the day I do urge you all to write down the names of the criminals at the central bank and remember to blame them for our soon to be crashing and burning economy. In good times we would have about 2-4 years before this bubble bursts, now however, with the impending American and UK collapse and very overvalued stock markets, the reality will hit much sooner.
If you haven’t already; you should start piling up canned gods, dried-up food packages, oil, gasoline, suger, and guns. Also I would urge you all to look into the possibility of growing your own crops. When the shit really hits that famous fan, you’re going to need it.
Minus derivatives but plus higher debt-GDP ratio the similarities with the US housing-bubble is striking. You need to go back hundreds of years to find worse economic decisions for the Swedish economy than that of the current central banksters’ madness. They have ruined the economy and the longer they are allowed to keep this up, the worse hang-over we are going to get.
The central bank should be leveled to the ground and everyone working at this horrible institution should be trialed for treason and locked away for the rest of their lives.
Even if you, the idiotic citizens, should share much of the blame, comes the day I do urge you all to write down the names of the criminals at the central bank and remember to blame them for our soon to be crashing and burning economy. In good times we would have about 2-4 years before this bubble bursts, now however, with the impending American and UK collapse and very overvalued stock markets, the reality will hit much sooner.
If you haven’t already; you should start piling up canned gods, dried-up food packages, oil, gasoline, suger, and guns. Also I would urge you all to look into the possibility of growing your own crops. When the shit really hits that famous fan, you’re going to need it.
The next law(s) soon here
Apparently as many as half a million Swedes today use anonymous programs and such to hide themselves online. Even if some authorities have the means to track those people, the cost in money and manpower probably makes it a too hard of a task. Also, looking at the issue itself, it is clear that most government officials and departments have very little insight in how things really work.
So, what will the legislator do when their fascist laws partly have failed, since they cannot track and keep control over all people? Yeah, you guessed it, new laws!
How about a law that makes it illegal to use such services? Or maybe some additional fines and taxes aimed at companies supplying those services? But my favorite prediction is a law that makes it “illegal” to use such services. Not directly, of course, they cannot show their surveillance drooling in the open, but anyone using such a service will be guilty before proven otherwise. In effect this means that private company thugs or government cronies will break down your door, take your pc if they find out that you are being anonymous online. Because that implies you’re a shady character, you have something to hide, you’re probably a pedophile and we need to protect the public from people like you.
Such laws and supplementary bills are coming to a country near you soon.
So, what will the legislator do when their fascist laws partly have failed, since they cannot track and keep control over all people? Yeah, you guessed it, new laws!
How about a law that makes it illegal to use such services? Or maybe some additional fines and taxes aimed at companies supplying those services? But my favorite prediction is a law that makes it “illegal” to use such services. Not directly, of course, they cannot show their surveillance drooling in the open, but anyone using such a service will be guilty before proven otherwise. In effect this means that private company thugs or government cronies will break down your door, take your pc if they find out that you are being anonymous online. Because that implies you’re a shady character, you have something to hide, you’re probably a pedophile and we need to protect the public from people like you.
Such laws and supplementary bills are coming to a country near you soon.
Where Anti-NWO people are wrong
After a weekend of bench drinking in good company I’ve spent most of the rest of the weekend watching the conspiracist documentaries that are pretty much everywhere now. As I have said before I don’t agree on all levels or on all issues but I do, however, agree on the basic assumptions and I also agree that the current system of greedyFascismStatismMadness cannot stand. Something needs to be done.
However, there are also a couple of other claims that we often hear from these anti-NWO people that is obviously wrong from an economic and political standpoint.
Nationalization of the central bank
This is highly stupid. When Sweden moved much of the decision-making of the money and central interest rates to its central bank I rejoiced. That’s a good thing. IF there should be a central bank, it should be privately run or at least be autonomous to such a degree that politicians not have any say whatsoever, except maybe for passing laws of restrictions.
A central bank totally in the hands of elected frauds is one of the worst things that can ever be. To no surprise we can find that one of Marx’s main goals on the road towards communism was a central bank in the hands of politicians. I rather have greedy, fascistic banksters in charge like in the case of the Federal Reserve, than having any congress or parliament running the scheme.
Nothing is as dangerous, not even the armed forces, to leave in the hands of politicians.
The Fed aside, that’s an own chapter, central banks should have few restrictions and a couple of constitutional decrees to follow, other than that there should not be a single connection between politics and the central bank. There should be a punishment of death to any politician that tries to influence, control or change the central bank policies.
And the ones being chosen to lead the central bank should, for example, be decided by 1/3 via parliament, 1/3 from private interest and 1/3 by a popular vote. They should only be able to sit one term of about 15 years and can never be replaced until their term is up. And maybe a chairman chosen by the king or president.
This is if we have a central bank at all, the best thing, of course, is to abolish all central governance of money and interest rates and let the market rule.
Globalization is bad
This is another stupidity we often hear, even from libertarians and conservative people, which is very strange. The very essence and a central piece of capitalism as well as for everything that has to do with freedom is globalization. Free trade agreement, like NAFTA, is great and should in this case be celebrated. Globalization is one of the main reasons why so many people have left the poverty line during the last hundred years or so. We need more of that, and less borders.
Of course there are built-in control functions, certain interests groups and such that have destroyed parts or have their own agenda, such things should be stopped and argued against, but not globalization and free trade in itself.
However, there are also a couple of other claims that we often hear from these anti-NWO people that is obviously wrong from an economic and political standpoint.
Nationalization of the central bank
This is highly stupid. When Sweden moved much of the decision-making of the money and central interest rates to its central bank I rejoiced. That’s a good thing. IF there should be a central bank, it should be privately run or at least be autonomous to such a degree that politicians not have any say whatsoever, except maybe for passing laws of restrictions.
A central bank totally in the hands of elected frauds is one of the worst things that can ever be. To no surprise we can find that one of Marx’s main goals on the road towards communism was a central bank in the hands of politicians. I rather have greedy, fascistic banksters in charge like in the case of the Federal Reserve, than having any congress or parliament running the scheme.
Nothing is as dangerous, not even the armed forces, to leave in the hands of politicians.
The Fed aside, that’s an own chapter, central banks should have few restrictions and a couple of constitutional decrees to follow, other than that there should not be a single connection between politics and the central bank. There should be a punishment of death to any politician that tries to influence, control or change the central bank policies.
And the ones being chosen to lead the central bank should, for example, be decided by 1/3 via parliament, 1/3 from private interest and 1/3 by a popular vote. They should only be able to sit one term of about 15 years and can never be replaced until their term is up. And maybe a chairman chosen by the king or president.
This is if we have a central bank at all, the best thing, of course, is to abolish all central governance of money and interest rates and let the market rule.
Globalization is bad
This is another stupidity we often hear, even from libertarians and conservative people, which is very strange. The very essence and a central piece of capitalism as well as for everything that has to do with freedom is globalization. Free trade agreement, like NAFTA, is great and should in this case be celebrated. Globalization is one of the main reasons why so many people have left the poverty line during the last hundred years or so. We need more of that, and less borders.
Of course there are built-in control functions, certain interests groups and such that have destroyed parts or have their own agenda, such things should be stopped and argued against, but not globalization and free trade in itself.
Thursday, October 29, 2009
Madness III
Glenn Beck does a simplified explanation of inflation which is just around the corner. He does waver a tad, and the final suggestion of where this is headed is probably only half-true, but it is still worth watching. Sometimes Beck get it pretty accurate, but even better, he explains it in a way that even you, the idiot, can understand.
Madness II
Here we go. More internet funnies.
I’ve said it many times before, and I will say it many times more. This is just the beginning, they are only getting started. If you are complaining over IPRED, ACTA or any other such fascism, haven’t you figured out yet that such madness is only the second wave?
The first wave was government subsidies for broadband, extra laws against kiddy porn, restrictions about whom that can be an internet supplier, the first surveillance things to catch some elusive terrorists etc. The second wave have passed very recently with anti-file sharing, terrorist hunting into overdrive, more kiddy-porn laws, total monitoring of the people, new or reinforced agencies, increased surveillance cooperation between countries and so on.
Now we are entering the third wave, overlapping the second. And as with the overlap between the first and second you can already figure out what comes next if you have paid attention. During the last year or so there have been many politicians arguing for better control of bloggers, there have been calls for more cooperation’s with interlocking penalties and swift transfers of “criminals” from one country to the other. We have also learned that information sites, not public ones that is, that give out “wrong” or “unregulated” information should be scrutinized.
From this we can easily conclude that there will be a couple of control functions popping up. During the next wave, that to a large extent already is here, we will see new government bodies set up to control, monitor and license bloggers. We will see the first fines against “wrong” information, possible someone getting sued and/or jailed for saying that the Swine flu is harmless or complaining too hard over some tax. During this time we will also get many exceptions from the rules previously implemented. If one agency cannot spy on its own people, why not have the neighboring country’s equivalent agency do it for them? And don’t we need an additional law to strengthen said agency?
More money is certainly needed to found another agency with a certain task that transcends the “real one”. There will also be more restrictions being placed on online communities and internet suppliers. Sites will more and more go towards charging people for their use, and more and more laws and regulations will also come with a bill directed at internet use.
And you don’t really need to be a genius to figure out that they will soon parade a bunch of pedophiles in front of the cameras, supposedly caught via the new laws. In reality it will be old fashion police work, but they did use a computer to log everything, so…
Of course there will also be a “hacker”-attack against a daycare center or old folks pensions will get stolen by some computer nerd. All in all it will be sold with the notion of “need” for the laws.
EDIT: I didn't even have time to really post this before an "hacker"-attack knocked out several Swedish newspapers. Or so they claim...
You don’t really want to know where this will end up, but take a look at this video, maybe you get an idea.
I’ve said it many times before, and I will say it many times more. This is just the beginning, they are only getting started. If you are complaining over IPRED, ACTA or any other such fascism, haven’t you figured out yet that such madness is only the second wave?
The first wave was government subsidies for broadband, extra laws against kiddy porn, restrictions about whom that can be an internet supplier, the first surveillance things to catch some elusive terrorists etc. The second wave have passed very recently with anti-file sharing, terrorist hunting into overdrive, more kiddy-porn laws, total monitoring of the people, new or reinforced agencies, increased surveillance cooperation between countries and so on.
Now we are entering the third wave, overlapping the second. And as with the overlap between the first and second you can already figure out what comes next if you have paid attention. During the last year or so there have been many politicians arguing for better control of bloggers, there have been calls for more cooperation’s with interlocking penalties and swift transfers of “criminals” from one country to the other. We have also learned that information sites, not public ones that is, that give out “wrong” or “unregulated” information should be scrutinized.
From this we can easily conclude that there will be a couple of control functions popping up. During the next wave, that to a large extent already is here, we will see new government bodies set up to control, monitor and license bloggers. We will see the first fines against “wrong” information, possible someone getting sued and/or jailed for saying that the Swine flu is harmless or complaining too hard over some tax. During this time we will also get many exceptions from the rules previously implemented. If one agency cannot spy on its own people, why not have the neighboring country’s equivalent agency do it for them? And don’t we need an additional law to strengthen said agency?
More money is certainly needed to found another agency with a certain task that transcends the “real one”. There will also be more restrictions being placed on online communities and internet suppliers. Sites will more and more go towards charging people for their use, and more and more laws and regulations will also come with a bill directed at internet use.
And you don’t really need to be a genius to figure out that they will soon parade a bunch of pedophiles in front of the cameras, supposedly caught via the new laws. In reality it will be old fashion police work, but they did use a computer to log everything, so…
Of course there will also be a “hacker”-attack against a daycare center or old folks pensions will get stolen by some computer nerd. All in all it will be sold with the notion of “need” for the laws.
EDIT: I didn't even have time to really post this before an "hacker"-attack knocked out several Swedish newspapers. Or so they claim...
You don’t really want to know where this will end up, but take a look at this video, maybe you get an idea.
Madness
The Swedish government is running a SEK 40.4 billion deficit, measured in September. But for some strange reason this is considered to be good news because the anticipated number was minus SEK 46.1 billion. In an alternate universe they may be right, in the real world, however, this is horrifying.
Even if we assume for a moment that the growing housing bubble can be managed and lets also at same time ignore current world events and the coming crashes in the US. Let’s also ignore the fundamentals in the Swedish economy, which are horrific in their own right. Even if we do all that, we are still left with the presence of this debt. It needs to be repaid, with interest. Just like with any loan the end result is much, much more money being wasted down the line than the actual money you get from the loan.
And the very notion of this as “good news”? How the fuckidi fuck of all that is unholy can they come up with such a stupidity?
The people behind this plot of by borrowing and spending on our tab should end up in prison doing sixty-eight years, breaking rocks and making special friends with Bubba the Weightlifter. Journalists writing about stuff like this in a positive way should be keelhauled, naked, in shark infested waters. And you who buy any of this crap are an idiot, plain and simple.
Even if we assume for a moment that the growing housing bubble can be managed and lets also at same time ignore current world events and the coming crashes in the US. Let’s also ignore the fundamentals in the Swedish economy, which are horrific in their own right. Even if we do all that, we are still left with the presence of this debt. It needs to be repaid, with interest. Just like with any loan the end result is much, much more money being wasted down the line than the actual money you get from the loan.
And the very notion of this as “good news”? How the fuckidi fuck of all that is unholy can they come up with such a stupidity?
The people behind this plot of by borrowing and spending on our tab should end up in prison doing sixty-eight years, breaking rocks and making special friends with Bubba the Weightlifter. Journalists writing about stuff like this in a positive way should be keelhauled, naked, in shark infested waters. And you who buy any of this crap are an idiot, plain and simple.
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
New World Order, Soros style
George Soros interviewed by Financial Times. Again we hear about New World Order. If you don’t have the time, check 9.24 and forward
When will the mainstream media pick this up? Or are they waiting for the world government to emerge before they say anything?
Financial Times
When will the mainstream media pick this up? Or are they waiting for the world government to emerge before they say anything?
Financial Times
The silent Galt movement
Oh my.
Something you should check out is this article in the New York post. Maybe Americans have lost their will to fight the power directly, but they still do it in massive numbers in other ways. Shall we guess that the powers that be will argue for higher taxes to cope with the losses? Harder punishment and more police to tackle the more violent inhabitants? Well, that’s a given…
Haven’t I read something like this before in a book?
Something you should check out is this article in the New York post. Maybe Americans have lost their will to fight the power directly, but they still do it in massive numbers in other ways. Shall we guess that the powers that be will argue for higher taxes to cope with the losses? Harder punishment and more police to tackle the more violent inhabitants? Well, that’s a given…
Haven’t I read something like this before in a book?
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
And prices are going up? How about that...
U.S. home prices appear have to scraped a bottom, with index showing three (four) consecutive months of gains this summer. Housing market analysts cited the federal government's $8,000 federal tax credit for first-time buyers as an important factor in the housing market's recovery of late. The credit applies to home sales that close Nov. 30 and is part of the $787-billion federal stimulus package enacted in February (This is likely to be expanded more months though).
This is, of course, reported as good news by media and pundits.
What I see is a dark mind numbing chasm of despair and just at the edge of it stands a tall building wherein all this fictitious cancerous pile of garbage is collected with all the people inside. It is also having a very scary tilt towards the abyss, just waiting for that small breeze to push it over.
Let’s see if I can get another one or two to understand something,
Firstly, the official US unemployment is 9.8% and rising. The real number is close to 19%. In fact there are as few people working today, as percentage of the potential working populace in America, as it was during what currently is known as the ‘Great Depression’. Got that?
And when we look at the housing market, as of today, the numbers are showing that there was 938 000 foreclosures during the 3Q 2009. Foreclosure notices were up 5 percent in the third quarter from the previous quarter, and up 23 percent from the same quarter a year ago, according to a report released by foreclosure tracking Web site RealtyTrac. This was the worst 3 months period since the - again currently named - ‘Great Depression’.
And prices are going up? How about that?
One reason for prices going up is the $8,000 federal tax credit for first-time buyers. Because this means something in this equation, it’s not a great amount of money, but it still makes a small difference that together with ridiculously low interest rates makes many people consider taking a loan, and many does. I couldn’t find any number showing how many of those people actually putting a cap on their loans, but you can be sure there aren’t many of them. In essence having loans they shouldn’t have with a volatile labor market with fabricated interest rates that must go up sooner rather than later.
Is this sinking in? Are you starting to get the picture?
Mind you, this is only looking at the housing and real-estate market in general. In this there is no reflection to a failing USD, there is no consideration to other debt accumulation or the retraction of the stimulus that’s comes down the road. No inflation, no derivatives, no commercial real-estate figures and no regard to a bloated stock market. I’ve even left out the very funny fact that lending companies are buying housing from each other or, even funnier, from themselves.
Only looking at these presented numbers, ask yourself; is it good or bad news that prices are going up? Do we really take such figures as signs of a recovery and add it to the pile of ‘green shoots’ we hear about all the time?
If I was an American, I would sell everything I have, move to cottage in the forest and start planting my own seeds with lots of guns and supplies stacked up. That’s how you should react to these numbers.
The clueless media is helping US citizens dig their own graves; I hope the American people remember that once the time comes for a reckoning of those responsible. But to my American readers I can comfort you with that the rest of us aren’t very far behind.
This is, of course, reported as good news by media and pundits.
What I see is a dark mind numbing chasm of despair and just at the edge of it stands a tall building wherein all this fictitious cancerous pile of garbage is collected with all the people inside. It is also having a very scary tilt towards the abyss, just waiting for that small breeze to push it over.
Let’s see if I can get another one or two to understand something,
Firstly, the official US unemployment is 9.8% and rising. The real number is close to 19%. In fact there are as few people working today, as percentage of the potential working populace in America, as it was during what currently is known as the ‘Great Depression’. Got that?
And when we look at the housing market, as of today, the numbers are showing that there was 938 000 foreclosures during the 3Q 2009. Foreclosure notices were up 5 percent in the third quarter from the previous quarter, and up 23 percent from the same quarter a year ago, according to a report released by foreclosure tracking Web site RealtyTrac. This was the worst 3 months period since the - again currently named - ‘Great Depression’.
And prices are going up? How about that?
One reason for prices going up is the $8,000 federal tax credit for first-time buyers. Because this means something in this equation, it’s not a great amount of money, but it still makes a small difference that together with ridiculously low interest rates makes many people consider taking a loan, and many does. I couldn’t find any number showing how many of those people actually putting a cap on their loans, but you can be sure there aren’t many of them. In essence having loans they shouldn’t have with a volatile labor market with fabricated interest rates that must go up sooner rather than later.
Is this sinking in? Are you starting to get the picture?
Mind you, this is only looking at the housing and real-estate market in general. In this there is no reflection to a failing USD, there is no consideration to other debt accumulation or the retraction of the stimulus that’s comes down the road. No inflation, no derivatives, no commercial real-estate figures and no regard to a bloated stock market. I’ve even left out the very funny fact that lending companies are buying housing from each other or, even funnier, from themselves.
Only looking at these presented numbers, ask yourself; is it good or bad news that prices are going up? Do we really take such figures as signs of a recovery and add it to the pile of ‘green shoots’ we hear about all the time?
If I was an American, I would sell everything I have, move to cottage in the forest and start planting my own seeds with lots of guns and supplies stacked up. That’s how you should react to these numbers.
The clueless media is helping US citizens dig their own graves; I hope the American people remember that once the time comes for a reckoning of those responsible. But to my American readers I can comfort you with that the rest of us aren’t very far behind.
Sometimes I spoke myself.
Just revel in the recent news about a exposed terrorist cell aiming at Danish companies and then read this post from just a couple of days ago: apocalypse nowish
These were amateurish people though, not really the ones I was referring to, and media have an uncanny ability to blow things out of proportions, so I wouldn’t take this story all that serious.
These were amateurish people though, not really the ones I was referring to, and media have an uncanny ability to blow things out of proportions, so I wouldn’t take this story all that serious.
The ideology of genocide
There is lot to be said about the environment movement and the complete lunacy of manmade global warming.
You can lift many facts like that 99.9% of all animals that ever lived on this planet is gone, poff, not here anymore, extinct. Why? Natural selection. Had nothing to do with cars or factories.
You can lift the fact that we know that the sun is almost the only thing affecting our climate. I say “almost” because volcanoes, cosmic rays, the oceans and the occasional comet have made and can make smaller changes. All of these things, even if we exclude the sun, have several hundred times more impact on the environment than mankind. This is proven facts; scientifically proven, statistically proven, tested over and over again, it’s the truth.
And in contrast to the manmade global warming scam, this is actually accepted by all scientists, this there is a consensus around. What they argue about is how miniscule humans’ impact is. Is it 0.0001% or is it 0.00001% or less? But…
…we could also mention that there isn’t one argument that holds, there isn’t a single shred of evidence supporting the alarmist’s theories. Not a single one. It does not exist. The very best they can say is that it’s probable to the degree of [some percentage] that man have a tiny diminutive little petite say in how the whether acts.
Have you ever seen a news article saying that it’s a 62% change that man is affecting climate to a degree of 0.00001%? That wouldn’t sell as many papers now would it?
I could go on and on, but what you really need to know is that this isn’t only about taxation or control, which is the true reason for the trickery; it will also have the most disastrous effects on many people’s lives.
Looking into the future there are literally millions, if not hundreds of millions, of lives at stake. Not only because of reduction of production, less trade or fewer jobs, but also because of the simplest of things like not having a stove to cook on, or not having a lamp people can sit under to study or work.
It is impossible, with today’s technology and for the foreseeable future, to keep hundreds of millions of people with jobs, with food, with water, with transport, with schools etc. without keeping up, or rather massively increase energy usage. And it needs to be the cheapest form of energy. What you need to know is that if we cut our emissions or energy usage, it means job losses, it means higher costs of living, higher production costs, transports becomes more expensive and so on.
Again, if this hoax is allowed to continue, we are condemning a vast number of people to certain death and hardship. And since it’s all based on a lie, you cannot call a person arguing for such madness for anything but evil. The true evil people are not the ones whom claim that manmade global warming is a fraud, which the elitists want you to believe. The truest form of evil is perpetrating a mass slaughter right now, and most of you are complacent. Don’t come dragging with that Treblinka-guard argument or that you were incapable of not seeing or understanding the facts. Only a drooling idiot with the IQ of a carrot sitting in a corner painting stick-figures on the wall can claim that. Not you.
Every time you argue for us to cut energy usage, you are actually arguing for the death of tens of thousands of people.
Every time someone claims they want to reduce emissions, close down factories, impose taxes on fabric-softener or any of the sort, they are actually saying they want to murder whole villages and knock off babies.
Yes, it’s it true. This is a fact.
I urge you to read the latest report from the UN on the subject (you can read about that in my earlier post and find links to it here). Now these people are the driving force behind this genocide, and this report is meant to sell you their murderess ways, but if you really read it its hilarious. They claim that a couple of hurricanes are proof of their theory. They claim that mud-slides prove that mankind is changing the environment. It’s so ludicrous, so out there, it’s like reading a very bad science fiction novel. Don’t check with me or with any of the tens of thousands of scientists that claim this is a hoax, read what the alarmists actually are writing and saying instead.
Nothing can convince you faster than how this fantastic make-believe world of maniacs is sold. This paper, that has to have originated in another dimension far, far away from any shred of sanity, should be read by everyone. Please check the map at pages (2-3) 8-9, its sooo funny!
And even if you are still convinced that this scam actually holds its ground despite not finding a single evidence to support that notion, what I’ve just told you, about killing people, is still there, still a fact. Are you prepared to sacrifice what in all likelihood is millions of people so you can save some Polar Bears? Take a long and hard look in the mirror before you answer that question.
You can lift many facts like that 99.9% of all animals that ever lived on this planet is gone, poff, not here anymore, extinct. Why? Natural selection. Had nothing to do with cars or factories.
You can lift the fact that we know that the sun is almost the only thing affecting our climate. I say “almost” because volcanoes, cosmic rays, the oceans and the occasional comet have made and can make smaller changes. All of these things, even if we exclude the sun, have several hundred times more impact on the environment than mankind. This is proven facts; scientifically proven, statistically proven, tested over and over again, it’s the truth.
And in contrast to the manmade global warming scam, this is actually accepted by all scientists, this there is a consensus around. What they argue about is how miniscule humans’ impact is. Is it 0.0001% or is it 0.00001% or less? But…
…we could also mention that there isn’t one argument that holds, there isn’t a single shred of evidence supporting the alarmist’s theories. Not a single one. It does not exist. The very best they can say is that it’s probable to the degree of [some percentage] that man have a tiny diminutive little petite say in how the whether acts.
Have you ever seen a news article saying that it’s a 62% change that man is affecting climate to a degree of 0.00001%? That wouldn’t sell as many papers now would it?
I could go on and on, but what you really need to know is that this isn’t only about taxation or control, which is the true reason for the trickery; it will also have the most disastrous effects on many people’s lives.
Looking into the future there are literally millions, if not hundreds of millions, of lives at stake. Not only because of reduction of production, less trade or fewer jobs, but also because of the simplest of things like not having a stove to cook on, or not having a lamp people can sit under to study or work.
It is impossible, with today’s technology and for the foreseeable future, to keep hundreds of millions of people with jobs, with food, with water, with transport, with schools etc. without keeping up, or rather massively increase energy usage. And it needs to be the cheapest form of energy. What you need to know is that if we cut our emissions or energy usage, it means job losses, it means higher costs of living, higher production costs, transports becomes more expensive and so on.
Again, if this hoax is allowed to continue, we are condemning a vast number of people to certain death and hardship. And since it’s all based on a lie, you cannot call a person arguing for such madness for anything but evil. The true evil people are not the ones whom claim that manmade global warming is a fraud, which the elitists want you to believe. The truest form of evil is perpetrating a mass slaughter right now, and most of you are complacent. Don’t come dragging with that Treblinka-guard argument or that you were incapable of not seeing or understanding the facts. Only a drooling idiot with the IQ of a carrot sitting in a corner painting stick-figures on the wall can claim that. Not you.
Every time you argue for us to cut energy usage, you are actually arguing for the death of tens of thousands of people.
Every time someone claims they want to reduce emissions, close down factories, impose taxes on fabric-softener or any of the sort, they are actually saying they want to murder whole villages and knock off babies.
Yes, it’s it true. This is a fact.
I urge you to read the latest report from the UN on the subject (you can read about that in my earlier post and find links to it here). Now these people are the driving force behind this genocide, and this report is meant to sell you their murderess ways, but if you really read it its hilarious. They claim that a couple of hurricanes are proof of their theory. They claim that mud-slides prove that mankind is changing the environment. It’s so ludicrous, so out there, it’s like reading a very bad science fiction novel. Don’t check with me or with any of the tens of thousands of scientists that claim this is a hoax, read what the alarmists actually are writing and saying instead.
Nothing can convince you faster than how this fantastic make-believe world of maniacs is sold. This paper, that has to have originated in another dimension far, far away from any shred of sanity, should be read by everyone. Please check the map at pages (2-3) 8-9, its sooo funny!
And even if you are still convinced that this scam actually holds its ground despite not finding a single evidence to support that notion, what I’ve just told you, about killing people, is still there, still a fact. Are you prepared to sacrifice what in all likelihood is millions of people so you can save some Polar Bears? Take a long and hard look in the mirror before you answer that question.
The Swiney thingy again
Public support for the swine flu vaccine is evaporating by the day as the rationale for the vaccine appears increasingly ludicrous to anyone paying attention. Moms, nurses, day care workers and members of the general public are increasingly realizing that arguments for swine flu vaccination just don’t add up.
Of course, if things dramatically change, there could be increasingly strong reasons for considering a vaccine. If the H1N1 virus mutates into a virus with a very high fatality rate, something that cannot happen overnight, things might be different. If the vaccine were proven safe with adequate long-term testing, that would be something working in its favor. If the vaccines were scientifically shown to actually protect you from the virus, then that would be different, too. Some officials claim this to be true, that it is properly tested and that it do protect you. Searching the net and reading official statements, I can hardly agree with such claims.
The vaccines haven’t been properly tested. There’s no evidence demonstrating that it protect you from the swine flu at any higher levels. And the flu has such a low fatality rate, why does a vaccine matter in the first place?
And the even more reasonable question is if all this vaccination really is necessary?
To start with, swine flu is far milder than any seasonal flu, so the case for vaccinating millions of healthy adults against a disease that is no more unpleasant than a bad cold is highly questionable. I’ve had this flu, and so have many of the people I work with in Scotland. Only one out of many had symptoms enough to keep her in bed. The rest of us had a slight headache, felt a wee tired but other than that nothing. If we vaccinated ourselves for any disease of this magnitude, we would be needed to stick a needle in the arm each week.
There is a so so argument for vaccinating those at greater risk, such as those with lung, heart or kidney disease, those with suppressed immune systems, pregnant women and children under 5 — but only if the vaccine works, is safe and it is not rushed into people with allergies against eggs and such which may cause fatalities. Also, we do know that the immunisation offers no more than a modest benefit in the elderly; indeed, the effectiveness of the vaccine is known to decrease sharply after 70 years of age. Some argue this is because of natural protection, they’ve already had the flu a time or several times before, and apparently survived.
We already know of several cases of people dying from suspected vaccination causes. Some people show very strange affects from the vaccine, often enough, like in cases before; those effects can be shown in bodily motor functions and in a neurological way. Even though such people may be within the normal statistic, it still goes to show how dangers may exist.
To summarize, why take a risk, although a very slim one, with a vaccine that is not 100% properly tested and is not 100% protective, when we are facing a flu which is the mildest ever seen? The risk of dying from the Swine Flu if you are not among the risk-groups is about the same, slightly higher, as the chance of winning the lottery. I suggest you use the time you think you have left in this life and play the numbers instead of taking the vaccine. Not a single person, with the exception for a nurse I know, will take the vaccine. Why would you?
Of course, if things dramatically change, there could be increasingly strong reasons for considering a vaccine. If the H1N1 virus mutates into a virus with a very high fatality rate, something that cannot happen overnight, things might be different. If the vaccine were proven safe with adequate long-term testing, that would be something working in its favor. If the vaccines were scientifically shown to actually protect you from the virus, then that would be different, too. Some officials claim this to be true, that it is properly tested and that it do protect you. Searching the net and reading official statements, I can hardly agree with such claims.
The vaccines haven’t been properly tested. There’s no evidence demonstrating that it protect you from the swine flu at any higher levels. And the flu has such a low fatality rate, why does a vaccine matter in the first place?
And the even more reasonable question is if all this vaccination really is necessary?
To start with, swine flu is far milder than any seasonal flu, so the case for vaccinating millions of healthy adults against a disease that is no more unpleasant than a bad cold is highly questionable. I’ve had this flu, and so have many of the people I work with in Scotland. Only one out of many had symptoms enough to keep her in bed. The rest of us had a slight headache, felt a wee tired but other than that nothing. If we vaccinated ourselves for any disease of this magnitude, we would be needed to stick a needle in the arm each week.
There is a so so argument for vaccinating those at greater risk, such as those with lung, heart or kidney disease, those with suppressed immune systems, pregnant women and children under 5 — but only if the vaccine works, is safe and it is not rushed into people with allergies against eggs and such which may cause fatalities. Also, we do know that the immunisation offers no more than a modest benefit in the elderly; indeed, the effectiveness of the vaccine is known to decrease sharply after 70 years of age. Some argue this is because of natural protection, they’ve already had the flu a time or several times before, and apparently survived.
We already know of several cases of people dying from suspected vaccination causes. Some people show very strange affects from the vaccine, often enough, like in cases before; those effects can be shown in bodily motor functions and in a neurological way. Even though such people may be within the normal statistic, it still goes to show how dangers may exist.
To summarize, why take a risk, although a very slim one, with a vaccine that is not 100% properly tested and is not 100% protective, when we are facing a flu which is the mildest ever seen? The risk of dying from the Swine Flu if you are not among the risk-groups is about the same, slightly higher, as the chance of winning the lottery. I suggest you use the time you think you have left in this life and play the numbers instead of taking the vaccine. Not a single person, with the exception for a nurse I know, will take the vaccine. Why would you?
Lunatics convict complete morons for the crime of tricking idiots
A French court has convicted the Church of Scientology of fraud. The case came after complaints from two women, one of whom said she was pressured into paying more than 20,000 euros for expensive products. Alain Rosenberg, the group's head in France, was handed a two-year suspended jail sentence and fined 30,000 euros. France apparently regards Scientology as a sect, not a religion.
In other words, the French lunacy of their courts have convicted the most stupid religious belief ever existed for swindling some idiot members into buying stuff.
I don’t really know where to start.
Well, let’s start with the fact that scientology is a sect, just like the Catholic Church, Islam or any other religion. The mumbo jumbo is about the same, fooling people to give God(s) money that actually goes to priests and their lavish dinners with altar boys, or goes to paying off terrorists or whatever scheme they are up to, is also the same. However, Scientology takes it one step further. Any religion stands out as a beacon of sanity in comparison. In essence, the people with the most severe mental illnesses on this planet can be found within this sect.
Consequently, why would any court rule in favor of two idiotic females? Shouldn’t they be locked up in an asylum instead?
And since when did it become illegal to “pressure” or “trick” people to buy stuff? If that’s the case any advertising could be construed as being liable under the same law.
I don’t think my skills in the English language are enough to cover this madness with enough alternative words for “idiots”. Let’s just conclude that this is another example of how stupid people all over the world really are.
In other words, the French lunacy of their courts have convicted the most stupid religious belief ever existed for swindling some idiot members into buying stuff.
I don’t really know where to start.
Well, let’s start with the fact that scientology is a sect, just like the Catholic Church, Islam or any other religion. The mumbo jumbo is about the same, fooling people to give God(s) money that actually goes to priests and their lavish dinners with altar boys, or goes to paying off terrorists or whatever scheme they are up to, is also the same. However, Scientology takes it one step further. Any religion stands out as a beacon of sanity in comparison. In essence, the people with the most severe mental illnesses on this planet can be found within this sect.
Consequently, why would any court rule in favor of two idiotic females? Shouldn’t they be locked up in an asylum instead?
And since when did it become illegal to “pressure” or “trick” people to buy stuff? If that’s the case any advertising could be construed as being liable under the same law.
I don’t think my skills in the English language are enough to cover this madness with enough alternative words for “idiots”. Let’s just conclude that this is another example of how stupid people all over the world really are.
The cuckoo clubs
Since I started to really know anti-establishment groups and fridge elements from all over the world, those sorts of people have tried to get me into their warm embrace sending constant inventions to groups on Facebook, sending emails wanting me to participate in some rebellious sect, or yelling at me when I refuse to comply with crazy notions about aliens or 9/11.
I’ve been clear from the start, I believe in conveying the truth and consequently I write about and argue for proven facts. Sure I mix some over-the-top sentences and some predictions into the mix, but the basis for everything I believe in is reality.
This means I can watch “The fall of the Republic” by Alex Jones, agree with 95% of the content but still discard many claims of being too much or even idiotic. Such opinions don’t go well with the Alex Jones crowd.
I do believe in the New World Order conspiracy theorem, because most is factual, and even if there’s not always a planned plot behind it all, it doesn’t matter, the end result will be the same. I do not, however, buy moronic claims of reptilian beings living beneath the surface, Alien interventions or Owl Gods being prayed to by presidents. To be fair, those out there notions are discarded by most within this paradigm. However there is also a near to consensus that 9/11 was a staged in-house attack, planned by the CIA, Bilderberg or some other group. In addition we have the extermination thought whereas billions of people are scheduled for extinction by the elitists. Often things like Swine Flu and the vaccine are a part of such claims. I could go on, but it’s not necessary.
Although I would say it is proven that powerful men conspire to steal from us, to rule us and control us, it does not mean that such groups would risk their own lives to release diseases. And even if there are relevant questions to be asked about the 9/11 terrorist attacks, almost all of the facts and, even more importantly, common sense isn’t on the conspiracist’s side.
My main point, however, is that all these fractions of conspiracists, truthers, libertarians, anti-government and anarchists people are too much spread around. We have everyone from socialists to religious nuts living within a notion of a, or rather several, conspiracies. As a result there is a divided feeling about the whole thing that makes me think of the communists’ problem of past generations. The main reason why communists never really came to power in Sweden and other countries, and the main reason why they never been successful in any aspect, is that they have had so many groupings that fought each other that they forget to fight capitalism. Leninists against Maoists, Stalinism against Trotskistsm, socialists against communists, and many, many other infightings have gone on. The only difference really, is that lefties have a thirst for blood, not having any problems killing off people with the “wrong leftie view”.
I would urge all people to not only check what the government is doing or read about such things that may or may not be true, but also check their own preferences. If we don’t look after our own “maniacs”, others will do it for us and consequently label all of us with the same lunatic stamp. This is what the elite wants, so it wouldn’t surprise me if some of the conspiracies are created by government thugs spreading disinformation.
My other main point is the one I have been arguing for, namely that the far left and libertarians should come together in unison, at least temporarily. Unlike the popular leftie notion of everything being capitalism fault, and the libertarian opposite view, very little of that is actually true. We live with a middle-center policy that mixes socialism with some degree of market economy. We have restrictions on all levels, and those are growing, and it all is about power, greed and it is a kind of fascism that faces us. Mostly it’s not about right versus left; it’s about the people against the elitists.
In such a fight, libertarians have more to win together with socialists than with so called conservatives. And socialist, real ones that is, have more traits shared with libertarians then with social democrats.
The problem here is really afterwards, if we win, what then? As I’ve stated before, libertarians have very little against people living within the confines of socialism, as long as that is voluntary. If socialist could agree on this view, leaving an exist-possibility for all people if they don’t want socialism anymore, much could be won.
An example of this could be to cut Sweden in half, one half socialist, the other libertarian. Between the border is open, all people are free to move from one form of government to the other. Let the people choose. I’m not stupid, there are a lot of other problems and this is a very simplified example, but I do believe that in the fight against the banksters, the tricksters, and the elitists there is much to be won for libertarians and socialists to stand as one.
I’ve been clear from the start, I believe in conveying the truth and consequently I write about and argue for proven facts. Sure I mix some over-the-top sentences and some predictions into the mix, but the basis for everything I believe in is reality.
This means I can watch “The fall of the Republic” by Alex Jones, agree with 95% of the content but still discard many claims of being too much or even idiotic. Such opinions don’t go well with the Alex Jones crowd.
I do believe in the New World Order conspiracy theorem, because most is factual, and even if there’s not always a planned plot behind it all, it doesn’t matter, the end result will be the same. I do not, however, buy moronic claims of reptilian beings living beneath the surface, Alien interventions or Owl Gods being prayed to by presidents. To be fair, those out there notions are discarded by most within this paradigm. However there is also a near to consensus that 9/11 was a staged in-house attack, planned by the CIA, Bilderberg or some other group. In addition we have the extermination thought whereas billions of people are scheduled for extinction by the elitists. Often things like Swine Flu and the vaccine are a part of such claims. I could go on, but it’s not necessary.
Although I would say it is proven that powerful men conspire to steal from us, to rule us and control us, it does not mean that such groups would risk their own lives to release diseases. And even if there are relevant questions to be asked about the 9/11 terrorist attacks, almost all of the facts and, even more importantly, common sense isn’t on the conspiracist’s side.
My main point, however, is that all these fractions of conspiracists, truthers, libertarians, anti-government and anarchists people are too much spread around. We have everyone from socialists to religious nuts living within a notion of a, or rather several, conspiracies. As a result there is a divided feeling about the whole thing that makes me think of the communists’ problem of past generations. The main reason why communists never really came to power in Sweden and other countries, and the main reason why they never been successful in any aspect, is that they have had so many groupings that fought each other that they forget to fight capitalism. Leninists against Maoists, Stalinism against Trotskistsm, socialists against communists, and many, many other infightings have gone on. The only difference really, is that lefties have a thirst for blood, not having any problems killing off people with the “wrong leftie view”.
I would urge all people to not only check what the government is doing or read about such things that may or may not be true, but also check their own preferences. If we don’t look after our own “maniacs”, others will do it for us and consequently label all of us with the same lunatic stamp. This is what the elite wants, so it wouldn’t surprise me if some of the conspiracies are created by government thugs spreading disinformation.
My other main point is the one I have been arguing for, namely that the far left and libertarians should come together in unison, at least temporarily. Unlike the popular leftie notion of everything being capitalism fault, and the libertarian opposite view, very little of that is actually true. We live with a middle-center policy that mixes socialism with some degree of market economy. We have restrictions on all levels, and those are growing, and it all is about power, greed and it is a kind of fascism that faces us. Mostly it’s not about right versus left; it’s about the people against the elitists.
In such a fight, libertarians have more to win together with socialists than with so called conservatives. And socialist, real ones that is, have more traits shared with libertarians then with social democrats.
The problem here is really afterwards, if we win, what then? As I’ve stated before, libertarians have very little against people living within the confines of socialism, as long as that is voluntary. If socialist could agree on this view, leaving an exist-possibility for all people if they don’t want socialism anymore, much could be won.
An example of this could be to cut Sweden in half, one half socialist, the other libertarian. Between the border is open, all people are free to move from one form of government to the other. Let the people choose. I’m not stupid, there are a lot of other problems and this is a very simplified example, but I do believe that in the fight against the banksters, the tricksters, and the elitists there is much to be won for libertarians and socialists to stand as one.
Monday, October 26, 2009
Republicans aren’t evil enough
Firstly, I’m Swedish and consequently not a voter in any American election. From what I’m writing on this blog I’d be surprised if Homeland security and the FBI would even let me visit US. And so I have no real direct stake in any vote.
Secondly I do posses many republican, or rather conservative traits. I support a restrictive abortion policy, not for any religious reasons, I’m an atheist, but for pro-life-reasons. To me human life is sacred; as a result I cannot buy the libertarian view that life only starts to exist at birth. Neither do I accept the liberal loose policy of more or less using abortion as a way of birth-control. I find people using abortion many times over instead of using a condom or taking the pill to be despicable individuals. Its life we are talking about, not some toy you can discard.
I also find myself being “against” gay marriage. What I mean by that isn’t that I’m against homosexuals marrying, I have no problem with that, in fact go ahead, love is a beautiful thing and if you find that in the same gender, you should be happy, and so should everyone else. However, I don’t think any political party should support one way or the other. And I’m very much against any form of legislation that, in effect, hinders and stop religious rights in order to be politically correct. If a religion, a priest or any kind of sect wants to marry or never would marry a gay couple, that’s their business, not the governments. So I rather say no, than say yes on this issue.
I have also other more European style conservative ideas. I do like school uniforms, I support the royal family, I like history and support the notion of keeping cultural inherent ideas alive. I want much harder punishment for criminals and mostly I also stand behind both the police and the armed forces.
Now this sounds pretty much like a conservative person doesn’t it?
I would still never vote for the Republican Party in the US, and I won’t vote for any party that holds those values in Europe either. Why? It’s very simple; there are three reasons for that.
Reason one is that most so called conservatives and conservative parties, don’t stand for any real change in policies. They are a part of the establishment, they are too entwined with the power elite, and they don’t want to change or tackle the real problems. In many cases, like with the former US president George W Chimp, they even make problems worse.
Republicans and most counterparts in other countries are in this sense not an alternative. A half degree less of hell is still hell. And almost worse is that they are not true to their own ideals, or their own history. Any historically conservative figure would have spit the face of any of the contemporary so called conservatives. It is very likely that Thomas Jefferson would have put a gun to the head of George W Chimp and pulled the trigger.
In addition to this any conservative party establishment has tended to choose middle-of-the-road candidates. They want to win election, not do the correct thing. Conservative leaders argue that if they want to win they cannot move too far to the right, thinking about the next election, but ignoring the long term protection of the country and not caring about winning people’s hearts in the long run.
When I was active right-wing politician in Sweden I once asked several of my party members what they rather have, a party that said and stood for an alternative and really argued conservative/libertarian views with 10% support from the public or a party that stood for a more mainstream view that had 25% support. Not a single one chose the first alternative. About that time I decided to leave politics. And just a year later that supposed conservative party choice a leader that I rather would call left then right, a broiler and power broker of the despicable kind. That’s what has happened to many, if not all, of the conservative parties.
Reason number two is that they take the meddling into people’s life way too far. It may be for religious reasons, some political correctness to win more votes or plain idiocy, but many conservatives have an uncanny ability to hinder personal choices comes to the private sphere. In private life I can most of the time even relate more to liberals or communists, then with the conservative view.
A guy I know once said that the worst political party is really a mixture of left and right, wherein left economic policies and the right moral policies come together (pretty much what fascism is). I totally agree with this. Sex, for instance, is an obvious topic wherein lefties often have a more open viewpoint, and consequently are more pro-liberty. As long as conservative want to regulate, control or in any way, for whatever reason, put themselves in charge of what goes on in the bedroom, they can never get my vote. What people do or don’t do is up to them. It’s an individual choice. You may have personal objections, but that’s all they are, your personal objections. Republicans, however, wants to use legislation and their conjured up moral high-ground to force people into their world. The same goes for things like alcohol, church-issues and so on. I would actually rather accept higher taxes and more government (to a certain degree) rather than have the government tell me who to fuck, how much to drink, what to do on a Sunday or anything else of the sort.
The third reason is that there are too many very strange people that have too strange policies. Very often they have deeply religious or intensely resentful views against immigration, even on bigot and racist levels and beyond. Those sorts of people seldom have any real power, but they do affect some policy making and can swing votes now and again.
The other side also exist, people that shouldn’t be members or active within conservative parties because, in reality, they are actually democrats or close to socialists. These are often old ladies that think they are better than the rest and believe that being conservative makes them a part of the beautiful and rich elite, consequently gives them higher status in society. Others are flip-flops with a “social conscience” that want to throw money at one cause or the other. Yet others want to ban sexual education or thinks that the very mention of analsex is the same as blasphemy.
I would argue that this strange mix of people make “conservative” parties the most diverse out there, but this also leads to less purity and as a result less conservatism.
There are other reasons, like the immorality of the voting process, but this outline sums it up.
Republicans and conservative parties are not a solution, people thinking that will only be disappointed. The Obamination will most likely lose the next term to a conservative candidate, but will that change anything? Not really. The republican mainstream will win, they will put forward a candidate sounding different that will change minor things, but in reality and the overall picture will stay the same. Shameful war-crimes will continue, the economy wouldn’t be much better and the status que would remain. Republicans are a party of power, a party for and off the elitists, just as democrats are.
The two-party system in America is a scam. I’m not saying the European systems are much better, but at least there are more parties to choice from over here. The problem with European conservative is that they are even more left, more like democrats than republicans if we keep ourselves to the American paradigm.
In other words, don’t cast away your vote. Don’t vote for the main parties. The establishment wants you to think that voting for minor parties is a wasted vote, it’s not. If you really want to change anything, you need to support those that actually stand for something, a party of alternative. Or you do as I do, ignore the process entirely. Voting implies consent. If you vote, you vote for the system, and you vote for a one-party system –something most countries actually have. The only true alternative when none of the ruling elitists are worthy of your ballot is to change the system by some form of uprising and one of the steps on such a rebellious path is to ignore the useless voting process.
I don’t vote, but if I would and if there existed a libertarian party, that would get my vote. I’m not a hundred percent libertarian, but at least such a party would change things.
I love capitalism, I love freedom, I love privacy and I love making my own choices. Nothing of that exists today in a world filled with fascism and political correctness. I also love porn, vodka and tobacco, all parties and know-it-all-people call those things “evil”, if it is, I also love Evilness. I want an evil party to vote for, republicans aren’t evil enough.
Secondly I do posses many republican, or rather conservative traits. I support a restrictive abortion policy, not for any religious reasons, I’m an atheist, but for pro-life-reasons. To me human life is sacred; as a result I cannot buy the libertarian view that life only starts to exist at birth. Neither do I accept the liberal loose policy of more or less using abortion as a way of birth-control. I find people using abortion many times over instead of using a condom or taking the pill to be despicable individuals. Its life we are talking about, not some toy you can discard.
I also find myself being “against” gay marriage. What I mean by that isn’t that I’m against homosexuals marrying, I have no problem with that, in fact go ahead, love is a beautiful thing and if you find that in the same gender, you should be happy, and so should everyone else. However, I don’t think any political party should support one way or the other. And I’m very much against any form of legislation that, in effect, hinders and stop religious rights in order to be politically correct. If a religion, a priest or any kind of sect wants to marry or never would marry a gay couple, that’s their business, not the governments. So I rather say no, than say yes on this issue.
I have also other more European style conservative ideas. I do like school uniforms, I support the royal family, I like history and support the notion of keeping cultural inherent ideas alive. I want much harder punishment for criminals and mostly I also stand behind both the police and the armed forces.
Now this sounds pretty much like a conservative person doesn’t it?
I would still never vote for the Republican Party in the US, and I won’t vote for any party that holds those values in Europe either. Why? It’s very simple; there are three reasons for that.
Reason one is that most so called conservatives and conservative parties, don’t stand for any real change in policies. They are a part of the establishment, they are too entwined with the power elite, and they don’t want to change or tackle the real problems. In many cases, like with the former US president George W Chimp, they even make problems worse.
Republicans and most counterparts in other countries are in this sense not an alternative. A half degree less of hell is still hell. And almost worse is that they are not true to their own ideals, or their own history. Any historically conservative figure would have spit the face of any of the contemporary so called conservatives. It is very likely that Thomas Jefferson would have put a gun to the head of George W Chimp and pulled the trigger.
In addition to this any conservative party establishment has tended to choose middle-of-the-road candidates. They want to win election, not do the correct thing. Conservative leaders argue that if they want to win they cannot move too far to the right, thinking about the next election, but ignoring the long term protection of the country and not caring about winning people’s hearts in the long run.
When I was active right-wing politician in Sweden I once asked several of my party members what they rather have, a party that said and stood for an alternative and really argued conservative/libertarian views with 10% support from the public or a party that stood for a more mainstream view that had 25% support. Not a single one chose the first alternative. About that time I decided to leave politics. And just a year later that supposed conservative party choice a leader that I rather would call left then right, a broiler and power broker of the despicable kind. That’s what has happened to many, if not all, of the conservative parties.
Reason number two is that they take the meddling into people’s life way too far. It may be for religious reasons, some political correctness to win more votes or plain idiocy, but many conservatives have an uncanny ability to hinder personal choices comes to the private sphere. In private life I can most of the time even relate more to liberals or communists, then with the conservative view.
A guy I know once said that the worst political party is really a mixture of left and right, wherein left economic policies and the right moral policies come together (pretty much what fascism is). I totally agree with this. Sex, for instance, is an obvious topic wherein lefties often have a more open viewpoint, and consequently are more pro-liberty. As long as conservative want to regulate, control or in any way, for whatever reason, put themselves in charge of what goes on in the bedroom, they can never get my vote. What people do or don’t do is up to them. It’s an individual choice. You may have personal objections, but that’s all they are, your personal objections. Republicans, however, wants to use legislation and their conjured up moral high-ground to force people into their world. The same goes for things like alcohol, church-issues and so on. I would actually rather accept higher taxes and more government (to a certain degree) rather than have the government tell me who to fuck, how much to drink, what to do on a Sunday or anything else of the sort.
The third reason is that there are too many very strange people that have too strange policies. Very often they have deeply religious or intensely resentful views against immigration, even on bigot and racist levels and beyond. Those sorts of people seldom have any real power, but they do affect some policy making and can swing votes now and again.
The other side also exist, people that shouldn’t be members or active within conservative parties because, in reality, they are actually democrats or close to socialists. These are often old ladies that think they are better than the rest and believe that being conservative makes them a part of the beautiful and rich elite, consequently gives them higher status in society. Others are flip-flops with a “social conscience” that want to throw money at one cause or the other. Yet others want to ban sexual education or thinks that the very mention of analsex is the same as blasphemy.
I would argue that this strange mix of people make “conservative” parties the most diverse out there, but this also leads to less purity and as a result less conservatism.
There are other reasons, like the immorality of the voting process, but this outline sums it up.
Republicans and conservative parties are not a solution, people thinking that will only be disappointed. The Obamination will most likely lose the next term to a conservative candidate, but will that change anything? Not really. The republican mainstream will win, they will put forward a candidate sounding different that will change minor things, but in reality and the overall picture will stay the same. Shameful war-crimes will continue, the economy wouldn’t be much better and the status que would remain. Republicans are a party of power, a party for and off the elitists, just as democrats are.
The two-party system in America is a scam. I’m not saying the European systems are much better, but at least there are more parties to choice from over here. The problem with European conservative is that they are even more left, more like democrats than republicans if we keep ourselves to the American paradigm.
In other words, don’t cast away your vote. Don’t vote for the main parties. The establishment wants you to think that voting for minor parties is a wasted vote, it’s not. If you really want to change anything, you need to support those that actually stand for something, a party of alternative. Or you do as I do, ignore the process entirely. Voting implies consent. If you vote, you vote for the system, and you vote for a one-party system –something most countries actually have. The only true alternative when none of the ruling elitists are worthy of your ballot is to change the system by some form of uprising and one of the steps on such a rebellious path is to ignore the useless voting process.
I don’t vote, but if I would and if there existed a libertarian party, that would get my vote. I’m not a hundred percent libertarian, but at least such a party would change things.
I love capitalism, I love freedom, I love privacy and I love making my own choices. Nothing of that exists today in a world filled with fascism and political correctness. I also love porn, vodka and tobacco, all parties and know-it-all-people call those things “evil”, if it is, I also love Evilness. I want an evil party to vote for, republicans aren’t evil enough.
The ultimate failure
The ultimate stamp of ‘loser’ has to be put on a country when McDonald’s is closing. I mean, come on. If I ever happen to get lost in the Sahara’s and stumble out of the desert into a city, whichever city it may be, I’d expect to see those golden arches among the first things.
Iceland, the country that has gone before the rest of us, showing our future, is in such condition that McDonald’s is out. This isn’t an anti-eating cow country, nor is it totalitarian or anything of the sort; the country and its people are broke.
It’s like kicking someone already down and it’s hilarious. It will be even more fun when the same company leaves the country wherein it was born. Oh, I cannot wait for that one.
Iceland, the country that has gone before the rest of us, showing our future, is in such condition that McDonald’s is out. This isn’t an anti-eating cow country, nor is it totalitarian or anything of the sort; the country and its people are broke.
It’s like kicking someone already down and it’s hilarious. It will be even more fun when the same company leaves the country wherein it was born. Oh, I cannot wait for that one.
One exposed cover-up story
A large crater in a field in northern Latvia, claimed to have been caused by a meteorite, now have been exposed as a hoax. Swedish own Telecom Company Tele2 have come out and admitted they staged this scam in order to send out a “positive” thing other than the economic dilemma the country currently is experiencing.
The wide crater wasn’t caused by an impact; instead it was artificially created the day before the government put forward their budget for 2010.
It is hard to read and hear about stuff like this without going “conspiracist”. Was this created as a test to see how people react? Why the perfect coordination with the budget? Why didn’t any media check the story until now? Did someone benefit from this story? And if you check the ownership behind Tele2, more questions can be asked.
The company, however, claim this to be a part of a coming marketing campaign. As a marketer and economists I need to say Bravo to this scheme, brilliant really. It can back-fire though, so the reimbursement of costs for the police etc. cannot be the only “free” stuff coming from Tele2. They need to show they repent, people don’t like to be fooled, well, at least not when they find out they have been fooled.
This is a very interesting event; I hope you think so as well.
The wide crater wasn’t caused by an impact; instead it was artificially created the day before the government put forward their budget for 2010.
It is hard to read and hear about stuff like this without going “conspiracist”. Was this created as a test to see how people react? Why the perfect coordination with the budget? Why didn’t any media check the story until now? Did someone benefit from this story? And if you check the ownership behind Tele2, more questions can be asked.
The company, however, claim this to be a part of a coming marketing campaign. As a marketer and economists I need to say Bravo to this scheme, brilliant really. It can back-fire though, so the reimbursement of costs for the police etc. cannot be the only “free” stuff coming from Tele2. They need to show they repent, people don’t like to be fooled, well, at least not when they find out they have been fooled.
This is a very interesting event; I hope you think so as well.
The next terrorist attack
As I’ve said before, there is just a matter of time before the next, probably much more lethal terrorist attack, hits a western country and city. London is a very likely target, but with the war efforts in Afghanistan and Pakistan increasing further under the current warmonger at the white house, we cannot really rule out the US. Also, for an even greater effect and an easier target would be to attack one or two of the other fighting nations. An attack in Denmark or against Danish companies would, for instance, show a good point.
I can see four reasons for such a prediction.
Firstly the current relocation of millions of people in Pakistan and the constant dying of children and families at the hands of the US led coalition and the current economic debacle with millions of people starving all over the world tells me that such an attack isn’t far away.
Some believe such an attack would be a staged one, although not very probable, you cannot rule it out. But if so, it need to happen pretty soon because when the retail numbers during x-mas in the US ticks in and the commercial real-estate market start to collapse in the beginning of next year in addition to the stimulus money running out, the real economic meltdown is just around the corner. In effect, the same prediction about an eminent attack also applies if such a scenario unfolds.
Thirdly there has been a lot of talk throughout from Osama Bin Idiot and other buffoons. Threatening and beating their chests. With the exception for car bombings in Bagdad etc. there hasn’t really been anything of the sort. Maybe intelligence has stopped some maniacs that we don’t really know about, but still the constant posturing cannot only be for show. Something also needs to be done, otherwise it’s just rhetoric. Sooner or later even fanatics will grow tired of the lack of proper action. Alas, even here we come to the same conclusion; an attack cannot be far off.
Lastly the growing resentment towards our elected frauds, the emerging racist parties, a constant barrage of anti-Islam propaganda and the financial crisis put together will make people frantic and desperate. People without a job, with no prospect, without any real hope and seeing how banksters and the elitists in the western world are stealing money while people die by the millions in wars and by starvation, cannot be discarded. When people have nothing left to lose and see all this crazy stuff going on, someone(s) will snap. The only prediction so far I can honestly say I’ve been half wrong about is that the number of shootings haven’t picked up as much as I thought. But such events and more direct terrorist acts cannot be far away.
And when such an event takes place, the last remaining civil liberties we have left will be washed away, in essence terrorists will win two victories in one.
If I think like a terrorists coming from outside and trying to attack the US, for example, I would probably avoid the largest cities and the well guarded sites, I want a success. Consequently I would probably target a well populated area in the Midwest, and I would use some form of gas because that’s the easiest thing to work with.
A more supervillain approach, however, would be to blow up or induce a volcanic eruption on La Palma as seen below. I wonder why no Hollywood screen writer have picked up this catastrophe?
I can see four reasons for such a prediction.
Firstly the current relocation of millions of people in Pakistan and the constant dying of children and families at the hands of the US led coalition and the current economic debacle with millions of people starving all over the world tells me that such an attack isn’t far away.
Some believe such an attack would be a staged one, although not very probable, you cannot rule it out. But if so, it need to happen pretty soon because when the retail numbers during x-mas in the US ticks in and the commercial real-estate market start to collapse in the beginning of next year in addition to the stimulus money running out, the real economic meltdown is just around the corner. In effect, the same prediction about an eminent attack also applies if such a scenario unfolds.
Thirdly there has been a lot of talk throughout from Osama Bin Idiot and other buffoons. Threatening and beating their chests. With the exception for car bombings in Bagdad etc. there hasn’t really been anything of the sort. Maybe intelligence has stopped some maniacs that we don’t really know about, but still the constant posturing cannot only be for show. Something also needs to be done, otherwise it’s just rhetoric. Sooner or later even fanatics will grow tired of the lack of proper action. Alas, even here we come to the same conclusion; an attack cannot be far off.
Lastly the growing resentment towards our elected frauds, the emerging racist parties, a constant barrage of anti-Islam propaganda and the financial crisis put together will make people frantic and desperate. People without a job, with no prospect, without any real hope and seeing how banksters and the elitists in the western world are stealing money while people die by the millions in wars and by starvation, cannot be discarded. When people have nothing left to lose and see all this crazy stuff going on, someone(s) will snap. The only prediction so far I can honestly say I’ve been half wrong about is that the number of shootings haven’t picked up as much as I thought. But such events and more direct terrorist acts cannot be far away.
And when such an event takes place, the last remaining civil liberties we have left will be washed away, in essence terrorists will win two victories in one.
If I think like a terrorists coming from outside and trying to attack the US, for example, I would probably avoid the largest cities and the well guarded sites, I want a success. Consequently I would probably target a well populated area in the Midwest, and I would use some form of gas because that’s the easiest thing to work with.
A more supervillain approach, however, would be to blow up or induce a volcanic eruption on La Palma as seen below. I wonder why no Hollywood screen writer have picked up this catastrophe?
White balls
Remember how George W Chimp got a lot of heat from playing golf during some crisis? Well, some genius have figured out that the Obamination have been out on the course more times in 10 months than the moron before him was during 3 years.
So when he isn’t firing phallus shaped rockets at babies, he holds a stick in his hands trying to get some white balls into a hole.
Since the current warmongering president have expended the war efforts, sent more troops and increase the war budget, I cannot help wondering if there is a connection between the white balls and how confrontational the president is.
Just a thought.
So when he isn’t firing phallus shaped rockets at babies, he holds a stick in his hands trying to get some white balls into a hole.
Since the current warmongering president have expended the war efforts, sent more troops and increase the war budget, I cannot help wondering if there is a connection between the white balls and how confrontational the president is.
Just a thought.
Do you want to be an Idiot?
U don't need to be an American to understand this video. Neither do you need to be an American to see the exact same thing going on all around us.
So the question is; how long will you stand it?
So the question is; how long will you stand it?
Good news
There is no secret that the relations between Venezuela and Columbia aren’t the one of bestest of pals. Venezuelan Dictator Hugo Chavez have been caught supplying both money and weapons to FARC, the leftist Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, that has been blamed for numerous attacks and holds about 750 hostages. And the different anti-trading schemes from the totalitarian regime of Chavez haven’t made things easier. In addition to this we have the possibility of American military bases in Columbia and lots of other fun things going on.
We also know that Chavez wants FARC and ELA, the national Liberation Army, to be removed from the list of terrorist organizations. The dictator also has had meetings with the No. 2 chief of the ELN, Antonio Garcia.
So when a bunch of football players end up murdered by ELA, supposedly killed for not wanting to join their ranks, it cannot really reflect in a good way on the warmongering Chavez. And remember this is the guy that has a very itchy trigger finger. Among other things sending money and thugs to Honduras to help with the rebellion against the lawful government, helping his dictator wannabe buddy Zelaya.
Chavez hadn’t anything to do with these murders; however, the situation in the area cannot be calming down by this event either. Earlier Chavez could point at ELA and FARC, according to him anyway, also conduction raids into Venezuela, claiming this as proof that those terrorists aren’t “his people”.
In either case, there will be people putting some of the blame on the dictator and it will definitely be another piece of the puzzle that sooner or later will end up in a bloody conflict. In other words, this is happy news from a comedy standpoint and we will soon see a very amusing messy war in the region which will lead to higher oil prices and possibly another American intervention.
Interesting times indeed…
We also know that Chavez wants FARC and ELA, the national Liberation Army, to be removed from the list of terrorist organizations. The dictator also has had meetings with the No. 2 chief of the ELN, Antonio Garcia.
So when a bunch of football players end up murdered by ELA, supposedly killed for not wanting to join their ranks, it cannot really reflect in a good way on the warmongering Chavez. And remember this is the guy that has a very itchy trigger finger. Among other things sending money and thugs to Honduras to help with the rebellion against the lawful government, helping his dictator wannabe buddy Zelaya.
Chavez hadn’t anything to do with these murders; however, the situation in the area cannot be calming down by this event either. Earlier Chavez could point at ELA and FARC, according to him anyway, also conduction raids into Venezuela, claiming this as proof that those terrorists aren’t “his people”.
In either case, there will be people putting some of the blame on the dictator and it will definitely be another piece of the puzzle that sooner or later will end up in a bloody conflict. In other words, this is happy news from a comedy standpoint and we will soon see a very amusing messy war in the region which will lead to higher oil prices and possibly another American intervention.
Interesting times indeed…
Sunday, October 25, 2009
Saturday, October 24, 2009
The solution no one wants to hear
Some of the media is asking the question of what to do about “extremists” parties with fascist or anti-immigration policies. The solution to this problem, as with basically everything else, is very simple, all we need to do is to eliminate government from the equation.
Our enemies don’t want to hear this, of course. Most of them live off government, by government and for government.
And what they certainly don’t want to hear is that most, if not all, of the problems that as to do with immigration as well as everything else, exists because of government.
6 simple steps to get rid of this “problem”
1) Eliminate all welfare, all of the programs all the social engineering.
2) Eliminate all laws that hinder people from doing whatever they want with their own lives
3) Eliminate all laws of political correctness
4) Eliminate all other laws with the exception of those that are about aggression or threat against each others.
5) Eliminate all form of punishment except for a very few ones in accordance to nr 4, and make those few remaining really hard
6) Eliminate all forms of “wars”; no matter if it’s about the war on drugs, the war on terror or actual wars in other countries. This will come automatic from above
In essence, get the hell out of the way!
If nothing of this is done, just live with it. It’s that simple. Either we really change society and let people be free, or we learn to live with communists, fascists, racists and try to keep the problems low or sweep them under the rug as is done mostly today.
There you have it, the solution.
Our enemies don’t want to hear this, of course. Most of them live off government, by government and for government.
And what they certainly don’t want to hear is that most, if not all, of the problems that as to do with immigration as well as everything else, exists because of government.
6 simple steps to get rid of this “problem”
1) Eliminate all welfare, all of the programs all the social engineering.
2) Eliminate all laws that hinder people from doing whatever they want with their own lives
3) Eliminate all laws of political correctness
4) Eliminate all other laws with the exception of those that are about aggression or threat against each others.
5) Eliminate all form of punishment except for a very few ones in accordance to nr 4, and make those few remaining really hard
6) Eliminate all forms of “wars”; no matter if it’s about the war on drugs, the war on terror or actual wars in other countries. This will come automatic from above
In essence, get the hell out of the way!
If nothing of this is done, just live with it. It’s that simple. Either we really change society and let people be free, or we learn to live with communists, fascists, racists and try to keep the problems low or sweep them under the rug as is done mostly today.
There you have it, the solution.
The contradictory scenario
I’ve earlier complained about Germany’s fictitious GDP increase, however, it is also true that the Germans are in better shape than many others i.e. only screwed, and in particular they still have the production capacity and do produce lots of stuff that many other western nations don’t do anymore.
Now the new German government has issued tax-cuts and a more reasonable economic policy which makes a very interesting future scenario come to mind.
US of A is in huge trouble at the moment. The American economy is so deep in shit a depression of giant proportions is just around the corner. There is no hope of anything else than many years of economic meltdown, and with new totalitarian laws popping up faster than Obama send more troops to his illegal wars, the situation doesn’t look good. Add in the manic printing of dollars, the cult-following of the president and lots of other fun things, and we have in fact a situation that is pretty much the same of that Germany had during the 20s. The countries may have traded places. Not completely the same, of course, but there are enough similarities to imagine a scenario wherein US end up in a civil war and/or goes on more confrontational escapades, and that Europeans, Germans in particular, sooner or later need to come to the rescue alternatively to stop the Obamination or whoever is in charge.
Okay, I do agree that neither of this is very likely, but the picture I just painted is kind of fun to imagine, isn’t it? And it’s not a completely inconceivable future either. Just envision German tanks on US streets saving Americans from an oppressive regime, or, worse, helping the sitting government impose more fascism.
Haha… now that would be entertaining!
But even if that is very unlikely, there is a country that may actually be even deeper pile of manure then the US, namely United Kingdom. And in that case, I would definitely not rule out bunches of EU-troops helping out quenching rebellions or “protect” any (un)lawful government.
Interesting times indeed…
Now the new German government has issued tax-cuts and a more reasonable economic policy which makes a very interesting future scenario come to mind.
US of A is in huge trouble at the moment. The American economy is so deep in shit a depression of giant proportions is just around the corner. There is no hope of anything else than many years of economic meltdown, and with new totalitarian laws popping up faster than Obama send more troops to his illegal wars, the situation doesn’t look good. Add in the manic printing of dollars, the cult-following of the president and lots of other fun things, and we have in fact a situation that is pretty much the same of that Germany had during the 20s. The countries may have traded places. Not completely the same, of course, but there are enough similarities to imagine a scenario wherein US end up in a civil war and/or goes on more confrontational escapades, and that Europeans, Germans in particular, sooner or later need to come to the rescue alternatively to stop the Obamination or whoever is in charge.
Okay, I do agree that neither of this is very likely, but the picture I just painted is kind of fun to imagine, isn’t it? And it’s not a completely inconceivable future either. Just envision German tanks on US streets saving Americans from an oppressive regime, or, worse, helping the sitting government impose more fascism.
Haha… now that would be entertaining!
But even if that is very unlikely, there is a country that may actually be even deeper pile of manure then the US, namely United Kingdom. And in that case, I would definitely not rule out bunches of EU-troops helping out quenching rebellions or “protect” any (un)lawful government.
Interesting times indeed…
Ahhh, that poor little convict…
An inmate in a Swedish prison in the town of Gävle, have filled for reimbursement for personal damages. He got SEK 18300, it’s about £1600.
What he did? Oh, the humanity! He hurt his little finger, the pinkie, or ‘pinky’ if you’re American.
This crying 46y old didn’t hurt himself during a riot or in a macho fight with some other inmate. Nor did he get bashed by the guards for smuggling in drugs. Nope, he played ping pong. Apparently he hit the table edge during a game.
I know what you must be thinking – but this isn’t a high security place, so they are allowed to play games, watch TV, surf the net and so on. Pretty much like a resort, only locked doors that someone keeps an eye on. Well, the same goes for the high-security places in Sweden as well, but anyway, that’s not really my worry here, I’m feeling a bit concerned for this criminal’s future.
What will the other inmates think? Does this really rank high in coolness factor? I mean, it’s hardly the sort of thing you use to get a tattoo like “I killed a cop” or “I love mum”. And it’s hard to see how this as something that can get you promoted or voted into some gang.
The macho and really cool thing to do would to have continued to play the game, won it, then cut of the pinky because it was in the way, and then mail to some former victim, just for the fun of it. Now that is something to respect, crazy and stupid, but never the less some points could be handed out for it.
What he did? Oh, the humanity! He hurt his little finger, the pinkie, or ‘pinky’ if you’re American.
This crying 46y old didn’t hurt himself during a riot or in a macho fight with some other inmate. Nor did he get bashed by the guards for smuggling in drugs. Nope, he played ping pong. Apparently he hit the table edge during a game.
I know what you must be thinking – but this isn’t a high security place, so they are allowed to play games, watch TV, surf the net and so on. Pretty much like a resort, only locked doors that someone keeps an eye on. Well, the same goes for the high-security places in Sweden as well, but anyway, that’s not really my worry here, I’m feeling a bit concerned for this criminal’s future.
What will the other inmates think? Does this really rank high in coolness factor? I mean, it’s hardly the sort of thing you use to get a tattoo like “I killed a cop” or “I love mum”. And it’s hard to see how this as something that can get you promoted or voted into some gang.
The macho and really cool thing to do would to have continued to play the game, won it, then cut of the pinky because it was in the way, and then mail to some former victim, just for the fun of it. Now that is something to respect, crazy and stupid, but never the less some points could be handed out for it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)