Three people who plunged to their deaths from a multi-storey flat in Glasgow were a Russian family seeking asylum in the UK. The family are believed to have jumped to their deaths because of a no in their application to stay.
I think they were testing their wings, but meet with concrete instead. Whatever the case I’ve been below that very building, so I’m happy they didn’t land on me.
15th floor… For not being allowed to stay in UK? I don’t get it, but I do hope that they weren’t smokers. Probably not getting a funeral if they were along with the fine they were handed for littering Glasgow pavement.
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
I would so have shagged Dr. Zira
Seven Muslims were arrested by Irish police on Tuesday on suspicions of conspiracy to murder a Swedish cartoonist who drew the prophet Muhammad with the body of a dog.
The four men and three women were arrested in the southern Irish towns of Cork and Waterford following an international operation.
The Swedish cartoonist Lars Vilks, is believed to have a $100,000 bounty on his head from an Alky Aida linked group.
This sort of monkey business is just the distraction our masters are looking for. It would have been even better if the assassination plot would have succeeded, but hey, cannot have everything at once now can we.
Even so, one can assume that the Muslims supposed failed action will further antagonize certain groups and increase people inclination to vote for any of the “racist” parties out there. Maybe the Jews fleeing southern Sweden can get a tad more support? Maybe the next time a poll measures how Swedes feel about Afghanistan even more idiots wants us to be there and help the US war machine murder Muslim families? Ohoh! I just thought of something. Certainly these arrests were made because of the draconian internet laws? They used Yahoo to communicate. Say it is so, please…
Well, there are probably not any buried statues of liberty in this story, fanatics are who they are and act accordingly. However, stories like this will have their own momentum and will gain so while our economies flush downwards.
I said early on that our elitist friends would blame greed, Muslims and a too free economy for this depression we’re in, and the more time passes by, the more right I seem to have.
Dr. Zira, I must caution you. Experimental brain surgery on these creatures is one thing, and I'm all in favor of it. But your behavior studies are another matter. To suggest that we can learn anything about the simian nature from a study of man is sheer nonsense. Why, man is a nuisance. He eats up his food supply in the forest, then migrates to our green belts and ravages our crops. The sooner he is exterminated, the better. It's a question of simian survival. // Dr. Zaius
The four men and three women were arrested in the southern Irish towns of Cork and Waterford following an international operation.
The Swedish cartoonist Lars Vilks, is believed to have a $100,000 bounty on his head from an Alky Aida linked group.
This sort of monkey business is just the distraction our masters are looking for. It would have been even better if the assassination plot would have succeeded, but hey, cannot have everything at once now can we.
Even so, one can assume that the Muslims supposed failed action will further antagonize certain groups and increase people inclination to vote for any of the “racist” parties out there. Maybe the Jews fleeing southern Sweden can get a tad more support? Maybe the next time a poll measures how Swedes feel about Afghanistan even more idiots wants us to be there and help the US war machine murder Muslim families? Ohoh! I just thought of something. Certainly these arrests were made because of the draconian internet laws? They used Yahoo to communicate. Say it is so, please…
Well, there are probably not any buried statues of liberty in this story, fanatics are who they are and act accordingly. However, stories like this will have their own momentum and will gain so while our economies flush downwards.
I said early on that our elitist friends would blame greed, Muslims and a too free economy for this depression we’re in, and the more time passes by, the more right I seem to have.
Dr. Zira, I must caution you. Experimental brain surgery on these creatures is one thing, and I'm all in favor of it. But your behavior studies are another matter. To suggest that we can learn anything about the simian nature from a study of man is sheer nonsense. Why, man is a nuisance. He eats up his food supply in the forest, then migrates to our green belts and ravages our crops. The sooner he is exterminated, the better. It's a question of simian survival. // Dr. Zaius
The Fantasia bubble
Oh my, even the press is starting to get it.
(Reuters) - Portugal became the latest euro zone country to announce austerity measures to rein in a ballooning budget deficit on Monday as debt-stricken Greece urged global action to curb speculation in credit default swaps.
But maybe even funnier is how things are starting to pick up in Spain.
They tried to whip up a self-cleaning incantation. They said it would be just like Fantasia. Jaunty tunes, happy dancing things, everything would be fixed. No worries. Anyone need more ‘green shoots’?
Anyone?
And we all know how splendidly Fantasia turned out for Mickey…
Cross-Posted
(Reuters) - Portugal became the latest euro zone country to announce austerity measures to rein in a ballooning budget deficit on Monday as debt-stricken Greece urged global action to curb speculation in credit default swaps.
But maybe even funnier is how things are starting to pick up in Spain.
They tried to whip up a self-cleaning incantation. They said it would be just like Fantasia. Jaunty tunes, happy dancing things, everything would be fixed. No worries. Anyone need more ‘green shoots’?
Anyone?
And we all know how splendidly Fantasia turned out for Mickey…
Cross-Posted
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat
The Greeks are not really carrying gifts; rather they are out asking for ‘em. We need hand-outs they say while they continue with the same policies and don’t do anything about the bureaucracy and corruption that is as much at fault as Evil Inc. (Goldman Sachs) and their co-conspiracists hiding-the-Greek-debts scam.
To a point the olive oiled Prime Mentalist of Greece does make a degree of sense. If Greece defaults entirely, which they should and very well might do, what does that do to the Euro-zone and what kind of ripple effects will it have? Surely it cannot end well.
However, the real mess that would emerge if US of A and/or the other European countries come to the rescue is far worse. If one country gets bailed out, why not the next one? Italy is on the brink, Spain likewise. Portugal has great problems and is about go through the same mess as Greece. And if the Gorgon of UK is allowed to continue on his path Britain will certainly follow down the abyss.
Are we supposed to think that the ‘only’ partly messed up Nordic countries along with Germany will pick up the pieces indefinitely?
Maybe the real question is how much electricity they need to print more money?
Legalize it
Stockholm police have busted a network of cannabis growers. One of the suspects is a record producer who cultivated the plants in his studio.
I’ve never understood why cannabis isn’t legal. It’s harmless, at least compared to smoking, drinking and things like coffee. No person in the history of mankind has died of cannabis. Not one. And the plants are great for commercial use as well. You can make a lot of stuff out of it like clothes, rope, bags, you name it. Not to mention that the leafs are beautiful!
I don’t like it myself, I rather drink vodka or have a good glass of wine, but I don’t care if anyone else munches away on a brownie or puff on a bong for a while. Would should I?
So why do the legislator care? Well, with the exception for the very spooky and supposedly scary ‘gate-way’ argument there is no reason. Police resources that could be used to catch real criminals like murderers or child molesters are spent to chase these harmless people down.
Just legalize it already.
I’ve never understood why cannabis isn’t legal. It’s harmless, at least compared to smoking, drinking and things like coffee. No person in the history of mankind has died of cannabis. Not one. And the plants are great for commercial use as well. You can make a lot of stuff out of it like clothes, rope, bags, you name it. Not to mention that the leafs are beautiful!
I don’t like it myself, I rather drink vodka or have a good glass of wine, but I don’t care if anyone else munches away on a brownie or puff on a bong for a while. Would should I?
So why do the legislator care? Well, with the exception for the very spooky and supposedly scary ‘gate-way’ argument there is no reason. Police resources that could be used to catch real criminals like murderers or child molesters are spent to chase these harmless people down.
Just legalize it already.
Demands for re-election
On Iceland several loud voices are now being heard calling for re-election since the sitting government obviously have no support for their: ‘stealing from poor Icelandic’s and handing the money over to rich bankers and stupid banking customers in other countries’ – policy.
Of course this is one way to go. But will it change anything?
What should be done is for the people to get armed and make a single unified statement.
Stay the hell out of our lives and if you steal our money, we’ll take your life!
If the powers that be don’t get the message, that’s their problem.
The same, of course, should be said by poeple in America, Greece, Britain, Spain and any other place whereas the banksters and tricksters are running their schemes.
Of course this is one way to go. But will it change anything?
What should be done is for the people to get armed and make a single unified statement.
Stay the hell out of our lives and if you steal our money, we’ll take your life!
If the powers that be don’t get the message, that’s their problem.
The same, of course, should be said by poeple in America, Greece, Britain, Spain and any other place whereas the banksters and tricksters are running their schemes.
Monday, March 8, 2010
The other shoe
Wondering why oil and gasoline prices are going up? Well, a big part of it is the manmade global warming scam which makes our cars and way of life a target for the elitists to tax, control and restrict. But the other thing is the never ending wars and who is benefiting from those.
This is a much needed flick to watch:
This is a much needed flick to watch:
The US commercial real-estate collapse
Generally speaking commercial property and rentals have loans one way or the other. These types of loans run over years and are either covered up directly by owners or by banks that don’t want to show the losses. Taking the loss means that it affects profits and that in turn would affect stock value.
And just as in the case of home owners there is lots of commercial real-estate that is still occupied by the renter whom is not paying for it. For the bank/owner to evict means to take the loss…
So when watching all these videos think for a moment what it means WHEN all these properties are counted and when the loans are up for renewal the coming months. And even funnier, banks continues to go out of business. They are closing down banks at a rate of 4-6 each week
The ONLY question to ask is: how long can they cover this up?
And just as in the case of home owners there is lots of commercial real-estate that is still occupied by the renter whom is not paying for it. For the bank/owner to evict means to take the loss…
So when watching all these videos think for a moment what it means WHEN all these properties are counted and when the loans are up for renewal the coming months. And even funnier, banks continues to go out of business. They are closing down banks at a rate of 4-6 each week
The ONLY question to ask is: how long can they cover this up?
Why they hate us
Since the dawn of the blog those set to rule have kept a watchful eye on what is written, linked and uttered by free independent thinking individuals. In the beginning however the powers that be took only slight notice. People writing dairies online or throwing out ramblings was not seen as any kind of threat.
Besides, the blogosphere didn’t exist yet and alternative news was mainly for political fridge groups and nutty conspiracists.
It is hard to put a finger on it, to name a date or particular event, but somewhere along the line all the embryos started to show promise. The constantly changing and expanding information-flow that comes with internet did automatically and free from any distorting regulations or taxes grow into an ever developing alternative.
Quite suddenly the old media wasn’t always first or even second with news anymore.
And, even more important, alternative not censored views could be read about any story. Ordinary citizen also realized that old media had an inherent ability to copy and paste stories from each other. Often only translated or directly quoted without thought, the printed and cabled out news had passed through several steps which mean that conveniently hiding facts rarely saw the day of light.
This the blogosphere development cannot have gone by unnoticed by politicians, leaders and governments.
However, if this was bad for the privileged, the next step in this evolution would be much, much worse.
You see with the instantaneous free flow of information and the development of communities as well as the blogosphere came whistleblowers. And since pretty much anything can be found online any ordinary Joe could spend time in front of the computer and connect the dots in a way the old media didn’t do anymore.
And so it was only a matter of time before the power of this would claim its first victims.
There has been many more than the ones I’m about to mention but these cases are either new or got stuck in my mind.
The Case of Cory Maye
Cory Maye was a prisoner on death row in the U.S. state of Mississippi. He was convicted of murder in the death of Prentiss police officer Ron W. Jones, during a drug raid in 2001. Maye pleaded not guilty at his trial, citing self-defense as his justification.
His case attracted no attention until late 2005, when bloggers started drawing attention to it.
The police mistakenly raided his home in search of drugs. Maye was woken up in the middle of the night by what he thought was someone breaking into his house. Given that he lived in a bad neighborhood and he had his baby daughter to protect, Maye grabbed his gun and fired at the intruder in self-defense. To anyone reading about the case and checking what was said it would seem the guy is innocent.
Even set aside the immoral police, a present racism and an unjust law comes to drugs, most of the evidence seems to free Maye, but instead he got jailed and first sentenced to death. With the aid of bloggers from all over the political sphere it has been issued since dec 2009 that a new trial will take place…
The Smeargate affair
Blogger Guido Fawkes (Paul Staines) exposed in his blog that a series of scurrillous e-mails had been prepared by Damian McBride, a political adviser working at 10 Downing Street, gratuitously smearing a number of Conservative MPs which had been sent to Derek Draper for consideration for publication on the Red Rag blogsite.
This led to the resignation of McBride and expressions of regret to the MPs concerned from the Prime Mentalist, Gorgon Brownie.
This would have shaken the entire surroundings of the one-eyed Scottish Prime Mentalist, and I’m still convinced that if the Labour elite could get away with it Mr Staines would be found with his throat slashed and body gutted in some Whitechapel alley...
Climate Gate (plus many other ‘gates)
This revealed the biggest hoax of all time. Although the initial “stealing” of documents and emails was done by some whistleblower of a hacker and the scam have been exposed before and since you cannot ignore the impact this and other revelations have had on the climate debate. And most, if not all of it, can be contributed to bloggers.
If I had to pick one reason to why our elitist friends are set to destroy the free internet, this hast to be the number one reason. The plot was so well thought-out, the indoctrination had run for a decade, all media had gone onboard and big business loved the idea, and then comes some meddlesome hacker and a bunch of bloggers and almost destroys everything.
Now their worldwide taxation scheme is in jeopardy and the millions they’ve planned to murder through regulations have a chance of survival.
The Nick Hogan incident
By “allowing” one or two to smoke in his restaurant and then not paying the fines as a good little sheep this poor chap opened the door to the righteous hammer.
Locked up and set to spend months in jail and seemingly losing his business, bloggers decided to come to his rescue.
Over a couple of days enough money was collected to pay the fines and get the man out of government’s confinement. All the while the old media hardly reported about it.
---
As said, these are only a few of the incidents bloggers are responsible for. The Old Media is starting to catch up a bit, realizing that they have been lazy and that ordinary citizens with a computer sometimes have the news.
This doesn’t look well for the powers that be.
Let’s say they’ve buried in the 2,000 page "healthcare reform" bill a mandate to provide G-23 Paxilon Hydrochloride to every municipality... for free. Because they just know they can make... people... better. And then imagine that ordinary people actually read that bill, something politicians, journalists and pundits never do and then it get reported on in blogs, lifted up and then reach mainstream media.
This will not do. This cannot stand.
The powers need to show us what the chain of command is – the chain they'll beat us up with if we don’t follow orders.
Most of you reading this already know I’m right that these, and other events, are the real reason for our bellowed leaders to lock down, regulate, monitor and tax internet usage. Some don’t.
To those of you that haven’t figured this out yet, start reading; start roaming internet while you can. Get the information and see for yourself. There aren’t pedophile-rings lurking behind every ip-address, there are no terrorists using hotmail, insurrections doesn’t start with a Facebook-page.
They do want you think and believe this so they can impose the fascism they love so much. Don’t buy it. They are turning the most democratic and most freedom loving tool ever invented into a totalitarian nightmare, and we don’t stop them soon you can kiss all the last civil rights you still may think you have goodbye.
Besides, the blogosphere didn’t exist yet and alternative news was mainly for political fridge groups and nutty conspiracists.
It is hard to put a finger on it, to name a date or particular event, but somewhere along the line all the embryos started to show promise. The constantly changing and expanding information-flow that comes with internet did automatically and free from any distorting regulations or taxes grow into an ever developing alternative.
Quite suddenly the old media wasn’t always first or even second with news anymore.
And, even more important, alternative not censored views could be read about any story. Ordinary citizen also realized that old media had an inherent ability to copy and paste stories from each other. Often only translated or directly quoted without thought, the printed and cabled out news had passed through several steps which mean that conveniently hiding facts rarely saw the day of light.
This the blogosphere development cannot have gone by unnoticed by politicians, leaders and governments.
However, if this was bad for the privileged, the next step in this evolution would be much, much worse.
You see with the instantaneous free flow of information and the development of communities as well as the blogosphere came whistleblowers. And since pretty much anything can be found online any ordinary Joe could spend time in front of the computer and connect the dots in a way the old media didn’t do anymore.
And so it was only a matter of time before the power of this would claim its first victims.
There has been many more than the ones I’m about to mention but these cases are either new or got stuck in my mind.
The Case of Cory Maye
Cory Maye was a prisoner on death row in the U.S. state of Mississippi. He was convicted of murder in the death of Prentiss police officer Ron W. Jones, during a drug raid in 2001. Maye pleaded not guilty at his trial, citing self-defense as his justification.
His case attracted no attention until late 2005, when bloggers started drawing attention to it.
The police mistakenly raided his home in search of drugs. Maye was woken up in the middle of the night by what he thought was someone breaking into his house. Given that he lived in a bad neighborhood and he had his baby daughter to protect, Maye grabbed his gun and fired at the intruder in self-defense. To anyone reading about the case and checking what was said it would seem the guy is innocent.
Even set aside the immoral police, a present racism and an unjust law comes to drugs, most of the evidence seems to free Maye, but instead he got jailed and first sentenced to death. With the aid of bloggers from all over the political sphere it has been issued since dec 2009 that a new trial will take place…
The Smeargate affair
Blogger Guido Fawkes (Paul Staines) exposed in his blog that a series of scurrillous e-mails had been prepared by Damian McBride, a political adviser working at 10 Downing Street, gratuitously smearing a number of Conservative MPs which had been sent to Derek Draper for consideration for publication on the Red Rag blogsite.
This led to the resignation of McBride and expressions of regret to the MPs concerned from the Prime Mentalist, Gorgon Brownie.
This would have shaken the entire surroundings of the one-eyed Scottish Prime Mentalist, and I’m still convinced that if the Labour elite could get away with it Mr Staines would be found with his throat slashed and body gutted in some Whitechapel alley...
Climate Gate (plus many other ‘gates)
This revealed the biggest hoax of all time. Although the initial “stealing” of documents and emails was done by some whistleblower of a hacker and the scam have been exposed before and since you cannot ignore the impact this and other revelations have had on the climate debate. And most, if not all of it, can be contributed to bloggers.
If I had to pick one reason to why our elitist friends are set to destroy the free internet, this hast to be the number one reason. The plot was so well thought-out, the indoctrination had run for a decade, all media had gone onboard and big business loved the idea, and then comes some meddlesome hacker and a bunch of bloggers and almost destroys everything.
Now their worldwide taxation scheme is in jeopardy and the millions they’ve planned to murder through regulations have a chance of survival.
The Nick Hogan incident
By “allowing” one or two to smoke in his restaurant and then not paying the fines as a good little sheep this poor chap opened the door to the righteous hammer.
Locked up and set to spend months in jail and seemingly losing his business, bloggers decided to come to his rescue.
Over a couple of days enough money was collected to pay the fines and get the man out of government’s confinement. All the while the old media hardly reported about it.
---
As said, these are only a few of the incidents bloggers are responsible for. The Old Media is starting to catch up a bit, realizing that they have been lazy and that ordinary citizens with a computer sometimes have the news.
This doesn’t look well for the powers that be.
Let’s say they’ve buried in the 2,000 page "healthcare reform" bill a mandate to provide G-23 Paxilon Hydrochloride to every municipality... for free. Because they just know they can make... people... better. And then imagine that ordinary people actually read that bill, something politicians, journalists and pundits never do and then it get reported on in blogs, lifted up and then reach mainstream media.
This will not do. This cannot stand.
The powers need to show us what the chain of command is – the chain they'll beat us up with if we don’t follow orders.
Most of you reading this already know I’m right that these, and other events, are the real reason for our bellowed leaders to lock down, regulate, monitor and tax internet usage. Some don’t.
To those of you that haven’t figured this out yet, start reading; start roaming internet while you can. Get the information and see for yourself. There aren’t pedophile-rings lurking behind every ip-address, there are no terrorists using hotmail, insurrections doesn’t start with a Facebook-page.
They do want you think and believe this so they can impose the fascism they love so much. Don’t buy it. They are turning the most democratic and most freedom loving tool ever invented into a totalitarian nightmare, and we don’t stop them soon you can kiss all the last civil rights you still may think you have goodbye.
International none-male Day
Those without penis have their own day today. Of course this means that media is filled with tales from all over the world, statistics and sob-stories.
One re-occurring topic is how ovary-equipped humans cast their vote. This is important for politicians because they get information essential to keep and expand their power. Just as the mammary glands are specialized to secrete milk following pregnancy, it is vital to know what decisions and laws that will secrete the necessary response from either gender.
Most of the research on this ballot-issue comes to the conclusion that communication with uterus and vagina outfitted folk’s needs a softer more emotional approach. So to no surprise it is often concluded that leftie policies resonate better.
Lefties know this, of course. To talk about how we can save people, help citizens while showing pictures or painting scenarios about how humans are suffering without this support, automatically leads to an emotional response that easily can be taken advantage of by any authority.
Emotions have very little (nothing) to do with economics or politics. The consequences might, but the actual action taken shouldn’t be based on anything other than rational and logical thinking hence the complete opposite of collectivist’s lack of brain-activity.
So am I saying that people with camel-toe capability are less smart? No, actually I would argue that the lack of a penis often leads to better and more informed decisions. You just need to take a look at how our weapons and projectiles are shaped to draw that conclusion.
However, to be stricken by a re-occurring menstrual cycles seem to have an impact on how easily fooled a certain being is. And it all goes back to emotions or rather what actually triggers emotional responses.
Since my own highly scientific research show that the attractiveness of the outer layers increases with every step towards the right side of politics, it also seem to indicate that eye-catching looks makes the none-penis person less inclined to listen to ineffectual emotional arguments. If so, maybe the increasing ugliness deteriorates effective countermeasures such as rational reasoning?
In any case I personally don’t care what gender any monarch has. What matters are the actual policies that govern us. If it is penis-people or those with fallopian tubes that ruins the economy and murder millions is secondary.
There is however one issue wherein I sort of agree with feminists – the issue of self-defense. Those without a penis are of weaker construct hence even the strongest with a black belt can be overpowered by a testosterone filled male. The real equalizer in this case, the thing that makes the tiniest and weakest of humans to be able to face any aggressor is, of course, outlawed. If our leaders really want an equal, fair and pro-clitoris society we should legalize fire-arms and self-defense.
A politically correct funny:
One re-occurring topic is how ovary-equipped humans cast their vote. This is important for politicians because they get information essential to keep and expand their power. Just as the mammary glands are specialized to secrete milk following pregnancy, it is vital to know what decisions and laws that will secrete the necessary response from either gender.
Most of the research on this ballot-issue comes to the conclusion that communication with uterus and vagina outfitted folk’s needs a softer more emotional approach. So to no surprise it is often concluded that leftie policies resonate better.
Lefties know this, of course. To talk about how we can save people, help citizens while showing pictures or painting scenarios about how humans are suffering without this support, automatically leads to an emotional response that easily can be taken advantage of by any authority.
Emotions have very little (nothing) to do with economics or politics. The consequences might, but the actual action taken shouldn’t be based on anything other than rational and logical thinking hence the complete opposite of collectivist’s lack of brain-activity.
So am I saying that people with camel-toe capability are less smart? No, actually I would argue that the lack of a penis often leads to better and more informed decisions. You just need to take a look at how our weapons and projectiles are shaped to draw that conclusion.
However, to be stricken by a re-occurring menstrual cycles seem to have an impact on how easily fooled a certain being is. And it all goes back to emotions or rather what actually triggers emotional responses.
Since my own highly scientific research show that the attractiveness of the outer layers increases with every step towards the right side of politics, it also seem to indicate that eye-catching looks makes the none-penis person less inclined to listen to ineffectual emotional arguments. If so, maybe the increasing ugliness deteriorates effective countermeasures such as rational reasoning?
In any case I personally don’t care what gender any monarch has. What matters are the actual policies that govern us. If it is penis-people or those with fallopian tubes that ruins the economy and murder millions is secondary.
There is however one issue wherein I sort of agree with feminists – the issue of self-defense. Those without a penis are of weaker construct hence even the strongest with a black belt can be overpowered by a testosterone filled male. The real equalizer in this case, the thing that makes the tiniest and weakest of humans to be able to face any aggressor is, of course, outlawed. If our leaders really want an equal, fair and pro-clitoris society we should legalize fire-arms and self-defense.
Sunday, March 7, 2010
Another voice about the Icelandic NO
This is too good not to read.
The Market Ticker on the Icelandic NO!
“If that (a 93% NO vote) decision is not respected, and Iceland's parliament continues to try to subjugate the people to pay for an act they were not responsible for, then the people must rise and put a stop to it, in its entirety.
By whatever means are necessary.”
YEAH!!
Read the entire thing here: The Market Ticker
The Market Ticker on the Icelandic NO!
“If that (a 93% NO vote) decision is not respected, and Iceland's parliament continues to try to subjugate the people to pay for an act they were not responsible for, then the people must rise and put a stop to it, in its entirety.
By whatever means are necessary.”
YEAH!!
Read the entire thing here: The Market Ticker
Saturday, March 6, 2010
A perfect example of how government kills
Khat is an amphetaminelike, green, leafy plant typically grown in the Arabian Peninsula and popular with people from Somalia, Ethiopia and Yemen. For centuries the "flower of paradise" has been used legally in East Africa and the Arabian Peninsula as a stimulant and social tonic.
In the Horn of Africa and parts of the Middle East, khat is a regular part of life, often consumed at social gatherings or in the morning before work and by students studying for exams. Users chew the plant like tobacco or brew it as a tea. It produces feelings of euphoria and alertness that can verge on mania and hyperactivity depending on the variety and freshness of the plant.
This traditional drug is now being chased after in many European countries, Sweden included. Only Britain and the Netherland’s have a slightly more free policy.
Of course papers are reporting that this drug as a “contributor to terrorism” since it makes Somalia warlords and Muslim fundamentalists rich. The drug also contributes to the stoning of women, it makes children pick up AK-47 to shot at other children, and it makes any male chewing it into a lazy bum that beats up his wife every time there’s a commercial on TV.
Although true that most terrorist organizations and some shadowy men get almost all of their income from Khat and other drugs, one sometimes need to ask why this is.
Firstly, drugs are expensive which almost entirely comes from being illegal. So growing/making and selling drugs is very lucrative business.
Secondly, people want drugs – that’s never gonna change - so the one supplying drugs gain much power just by delivering it. Again because of the illegality only the so called terrorists, mafia and such are the ones that win.
Thirdly, since any transaction between user and seller need to take place in secret, through smuggling or in dark alleys it means that a sub-cultures is formed and the police, boarder-patrols and other law enforcement need to work harder, hire more people and so ending up costing the taxpayers lots more.
If the drug were legal it would be grown and sold everywhere and since you could get it at the supermarket at a fraction of today’s price almost all income to mafias, terrorists and crime syndicates would disappear.
If you really want to point a finger you should do so at the one entity that is culpable for creating, supporting and in other ways helping terrorism, the one that has outlaw Kath, or any other drug for that matter, and so really is the main culprit - Government.
Every sack with heroin, every string of cocaine and every car filled with Kath comes with a big THANK YOU –note to your government from al-Shabab, Alky Aida or any other terrorist organization.
Without your government founding terrorism in this manor there would hardly be any terrorism, so you can bet your life on that when Bin-Laden pray one of the first things he says is to give thanks to western governments for founding his war against the same governments.
This is the essence of the ‘war on drugs’ idiocy.
Think about that next time you smoke tobacco that kills twenty times more people that all the drugs combined while drinking alcohol that kills fifteen times more than all the drugs combined while you’re paying taxes to your government. Government which is the worst murderer of humans that ever was…
In the Horn of Africa and parts of the Middle East, khat is a regular part of life, often consumed at social gatherings or in the morning before work and by students studying for exams. Users chew the plant like tobacco or brew it as a tea. It produces feelings of euphoria and alertness that can verge on mania and hyperactivity depending on the variety and freshness of the plant.
This traditional drug is now being chased after in many European countries, Sweden included. Only Britain and the Netherland’s have a slightly more free policy.
Of course papers are reporting that this drug as a “contributor to terrorism” since it makes Somalia warlords and Muslim fundamentalists rich. The drug also contributes to the stoning of women, it makes children pick up AK-47 to shot at other children, and it makes any male chewing it into a lazy bum that beats up his wife every time there’s a commercial on TV.
Although true that most terrorist organizations and some shadowy men get almost all of their income from Khat and other drugs, one sometimes need to ask why this is.
Firstly, drugs are expensive which almost entirely comes from being illegal. So growing/making and selling drugs is very lucrative business.
Secondly, people want drugs – that’s never gonna change - so the one supplying drugs gain much power just by delivering it. Again because of the illegality only the so called terrorists, mafia and such are the ones that win.
Thirdly, since any transaction between user and seller need to take place in secret, through smuggling or in dark alleys it means that a sub-cultures is formed and the police, boarder-patrols and other law enforcement need to work harder, hire more people and so ending up costing the taxpayers lots more.
If the drug were legal it would be grown and sold everywhere and since you could get it at the supermarket at a fraction of today’s price almost all income to mafias, terrorists and crime syndicates would disappear.
If you really want to point a finger you should do so at the one entity that is culpable for creating, supporting and in other ways helping terrorism, the one that has outlaw Kath, or any other drug for that matter, and so really is the main culprit - Government.
Every sack with heroin, every string of cocaine and every car filled with Kath comes with a big THANK YOU –note to your government from al-Shabab, Alky Aida or any other terrorist organization.
Without your government founding terrorism in this manor there would hardly be any terrorism, so you can bet your life on that when Bin-Laden pray one of the first things he says is to give thanks to western governments for founding his war against the same governments.
This is the essence of the ‘war on drugs’ idiocy.
Think about that next time you smoke tobacco that kills twenty times more people that all the drugs combined while drinking alcohol that kills fifteen times more than all the drugs combined while you’re paying taxes to your government. Government which is the worst murderer of humans that ever was…
Obligatory body scanning "not acceptable" says Tory
Will Cameron scrap these scanners, then - or make their use voluntary?
The European Commission (EC) is due to publish a report, shortly on body scanners as requested by parliament in 2008.
2008!
MEP de Kerkhove insisted that the report should be published as soon as possible to move the debate along.
How typical that McDoom makes them mandatory even before a report is issued on the subject!
It seems to me that this government and governments around the world were just waiting for an excuse to roll out the use of these scanners.
Is this yet another case of lobby groups and corporations robbing us of our freedoms and privacy to enrich themselves?
Cross-posted
The European Commission (EC) is due to publish a report, shortly on body scanners as requested by parliament in 2008.
2008!
MEP de Kerkhove insisted that the report should be published as soon as possible to move the debate along.
How typical that McDoom makes them mandatory even before a report is issued on the subject!
It seems to me that this government and governments around the world were just waiting for an excuse to roll out the use of these scanners.
Is this yet another case of lobby groups and corporations robbing us of our freedoms and privacy to enrich themselves?
Cross-posted
Icelandic ‘Screw you’
Hopefully, and most likely the Icelandic people will today vote NO to the poor-to-bail-out-banksters suggestion following the collapse of the Icesave bank.
Somehow Sweden, IMF and several others have said that impending loans are contingent on the Icelandic government putting up tax money to pay for a private bank’s mistakes abroad.
Firstly, why do a country need take loans at all? Despite having two degrees in economics and having spent most of my life checking, reading, arguing and writing about finance and economics I’ve still not got why governments (all of them) need to take loans. Well, I do understand the fundamentals and the fractional-banking system as well as the inflationary and GDP scams, but it still remains a mystery of sort.
A country that needs to borrow money from abroad or in need of extra help from neighboring states when no natural disaster have struck is insolvent. Something is seriously wrong and if it were a company bankruptcy would be the next step, not borrowing.
And secondly, why the hell should any potential lending country refuse to “help” just because an Icelandic referendum or sovereign decision means no money to a private bank?
And why should the Icelandic nation should pay for other people's mistakes? If we had a free market economy this wouldn’t even be discussed. Well, the situation wouldn’t arise in the first case.
If you take the risk; you take the winnings as well as the losses.
If a bunch of people went belly-up that’s their problem, and if certain governments bail out idiotic bankers and stupid customers, why should others, who had nothing to do with it, pay for it? Is it so the banksters can get their bonuses?
And the Gorgon of UK and his marry band of thugs haven’t made things better. UK, one of the countries showing anger towards Iceland and demanding remuneration, has used anti-terrorist legislation to freeze Icesave assets in the country.
Terrorism? Really? And if NueLabour can just pick a private company and hold it ransom like this, what’s next? Of course Britain should officially apologise for this sort of actions and not a single penny should go from Icelandic taxpayers to bail out idiots that apparently believed in both Santa and the Ester-bunny.
Somehow Sweden, IMF and several others have said that impending loans are contingent on the Icelandic government putting up tax money to pay for a private bank’s mistakes abroad.
Firstly, why do a country need take loans at all? Despite having two degrees in economics and having spent most of my life checking, reading, arguing and writing about finance and economics I’ve still not got why governments (all of them) need to take loans. Well, I do understand the fundamentals and the fractional-banking system as well as the inflationary and GDP scams, but it still remains a mystery of sort.
A country that needs to borrow money from abroad or in need of extra help from neighboring states when no natural disaster have struck is insolvent. Something is seriously wrong and if it were a company bankruptcy would be the next step, not borrowing.
And secondly, why the hell should any potential lending country refuse to “help” just because an Icelandic referendum or sovereign decision means no money to a private bank?
And why should the Icelandic nation should pay for other people's mistakes? If we had a free market economy this wouldn’t even be discussed. Well, the situation wouldn’t arise in the first case.
If you take the risk; you take the winnings as well as the losses.
If a bunch of people went belly-up that’s their problem, and if certain governments bail out idiotic bankers and stupid customers, why should others, who had nothing to do with it, pay for it? Is it so the banksters can get their bonuses?
And the Gorgon of UK and his marry band of thugs haven’t made things better. UK, one of the countries showing anger towards Iceland and demanding remuneration, has used anti-terrorist legislation to freeze Icesave assets in the country.
Terrorism? Really? And if NueLabour can just pick a private company and hold it ransom like this, what’s next? Of course Britain should officially apologise for this sort of actions and not a single penny should go from Icelandic taxpayers to bail out idiots that apparently believed in both Santa and the Ester-bunny.
Friday, March 5, 2010
Sell a couple of islands you morons
Greece has been advised to sell off islands to regulate some of the public debts.
Alongside austerity measures such as cuts to public sector pay and a freeze on state pensions, why not sell a few uninhabited islands or ancient artefacts, asked Josef Schlarmann, a senior member of Angela Merkel's Christian Democrats, and Frank Schaeffler, a finance policy expert in the Free Democrats.
"The chancellor cannot promise Greece any help," Schaeffler told Bild in a story under the headline: "Sell your islands, you bankrupt Greeks! And sell the Acropolis too!" "Those in insolvency have to sell everything they have to pay their creditors," Schlarmann told Bild newspaper. "Greece owns buildings, companies and uninhabited islands, which could all be used for debt redemption."
Although not such a bad suggestion, I see no reason why the Greek government should sit on such property. And you gotto love the audacity of these Germans. I mean telling a government to sell off national treasures and auction off the very history of a people to cover debt is hilarious really, and oh so right.
But I still don’t really understand the point.
Firstly, who’s going to buy? If they sell them for a fiver sure, I could use a holiday home and a couple of statues, but if they want some revenue we’re talking tens of millions and I cannot really see anyone buying for that price.
Well, one thing that wouldn’t surprise me a bit is if Evil Inc. Goldman Sachs stepped in with some of that stolen money. Now that would be a nice move!
First they prop up markets with air; they hide away Greek debt so Greece can become members of the Euro-zone, AIG (controlled by Evil Inc.) take much of the losses and both companies gets billions of dollars in bail-out and then Goldman, suddenly showing massive profits, goes out on a shopping spree to buy property for a penny on the dollar. If they were to buy Greek islands it would be the funniest icing on the cake ever seen.
It would be like buying a country for money stolen from the same country! Could Lex Luthor or Skeletor done it better? Hardly.
Secondly, even if the Greeks get Evil Inc. or any other thieves to buy islands, it wouldn’t have any real impact on the debt. A couple of tens of millions would be a drop of water in the Aegean.
Maybe Acropolis and the Parthenon would bring in some cash, or why not sell the entire city of Athens? I’m certain Goldman wouldn’t resist such an opportunity.
Oh, here’s a notion! Why not sell the country, all of it, to another nation? Maybe the Germans would be interested? Maybe the European Central Bank has some coins lying around?
Alongside austerity measures such as cuts to public sector pay and a freeze on state pensions, why not sell a few uninhabited islands or ancient artefacts, asked Josef Schlarmann, a senior member of Angela Merkel's Christian Democrats, and Frank Schaeffler, a finance policy expert in the Free Democrats.
"The chancellor cannot promise Greece any help," Schaeffler told Bild in a story under the headline: "Sell your islands, you bankrupt Greeks! And sell the Acropolis too!" "Those in insolvency have to sell everything they have to pay their creditors," Schlarmann told Bild newspaper. "Greece owns buildings, companies and uninhabited islands, which could all be used for debt redemption."
Although not such a bad suggestion, I see no reason why the Greek government should sit on such property. And you gotto love the audacity of these Germans. I mean telling a government to sell off national treasures and auction off the very history of a people to cover debt is hilarious really, and oh so right.
But I still don’t really understand the point.
Firstly, who’s going to buy? If they sell them for a fiver sure, I could use a holiday home and a couple of statues, but if they want some revenue we’re talking tens of millions and I cannot really see anyone buying for that price.
Well, one thing that wouldn’t surprise me a bit is if Evil Inc. Goldman Sachs stepped in with some of that stolen money. Now that would be a nice move!
First they prop up markets with air; they hide away Greek debt so Greece can become members of the Euro-zone, AIG (controlled by Evil Inc.) take much of the losses and both companies gets billions of dollars in bail-out and then Goldman, suddenly showing massive profits, goes out on a shopping spree to buy property for a penny on the dollar. If they were to buy Greek islands it would be the funniest icing on the cake ever seen.
It would be like buying a country for money stolen from the same country! Could Lex Luthor or Skeletor done it better? Hardly.
Secondly, even if the Greeks get Evil Inc. or any other thieves to buy islands, it wouldn’t have any real impact on the debt. A couple of tens of millions would be a drop of water in the Aegean.
Maybe Acropolis and the Parthenon would bring in some cash, or why not sell the entire city of Athens? I’m certain Goldman wouldn’t resist such an opportunity.
Oh, here’s a notion! Why not sell the country, all of it, to another nation? Maybe the Germans would be interested? Maybe the European Central Bank has some coins lying around?
The unspoken reason why USA is failing
I usually thrash the Obamination and his leftie followers like Gorgie W Chimp (and his father), the Cunt’ons, mainstream media, feminists, unions and other useless items that are mainly responsible for the rapid decline.
However, there’s another reason why the country of the serfs is rapidly turning into a scrapheap. This reason is generally contributed to the rightwing of politics. What I am talking about is ‘religion’, and more specifically deeply believing Christians.
Before you read further on you should know I detest all religions. There are thousands of them, each one less believable then the other. And wackiest of them all is scientology - those people should be institutionalized. I also prefer Christianity before Jewish or Islam, but that’s a cultural thing, not a graded scale. I’m sure I would think otherwise if I had grown up in a Jewish or Muslim community.
With this said there are lots of complete morons in the US that not only believe in the Bible and Jesus, but do it literarily and use it both as a guiding star and as an argument in public debates.
Christianity is built upon several well documented lies and, as is the case with all religions, it is based on earlier stories and religions that came before.
The Old Testament for instance is to a large degree stolen from older Sumerian tales. This we know since we have tablets and archeological findings to support it. Some of the biblical stories, like the one about Moses for instance, we don’t have any evidence or historical records of other then from the bible, but as said most of the bible is stolen from other religions and cultures.
And the bible was put together through voting at the Council of Nicaea (325 AD). Some religious leaders got together and voted on what stories that should be included. Many important and even more popular tales was left out because they were too much pro-woman, too much anti-government or contradicted the power of the church.
The entire scripture is filled with complete nonsense no thinking adult can believe in. Worse is that there are a lot of contradictions and passages that if applied would be both anti-democratic and anti-human.
Religious nuts quote certain text that fits their agenda, while other text are ignored or at least not put forward because that would hurt their cause. And so it becomes wrong for two men to have sex, but the text next to it about stoning women doesn’t sound too good so that is not said in the open.
This religiosity also impacts society. Abortion becomes a horrific sin and outlawed, stem-cell research is stopped, gay couples cannot marry, and not going to church in some communities is regarded as the same as committing a crime. Worse still is that it have an impact on what leaders are chosen, why certain wars are a good thing and since according to the bible those in power sits there for a reason, it becomes harder to criticize.
And as we all know, religion makes it easier to hate others, makes it easier to see differences or not care about those with another faith. This in turn feeds racism, antagonism and other forms of collectivism.
And creationism? I mean, please. How can so many idiots in the US buy that shit? Unbelievable.
I know hardly any religious person would agree with me, but to me this is facts and if they are so do they contribute to the decline of America.
I’m not saying we should outlaw religion or that people should stop believing, no, that’s peoples right no matter how stupid it may be. What I am saying however is that religion should be completely left out of politics and how societies are formed. When a religion gets hold of the people it’s almost as bad as socialism.
“Religion is a opiate for the people” - probably the only true thing Karl Marx ever said.
The problem with America is that when progressives take power they increase taxation and reduce individual rights comes to property, liberty and interactions between humans. The state take over more of the economy and the thing that made USA great deteriorates. But when religious people take power or have influence they in turn restrict personal liberties and even if they are not as bad as socialists in infringing on life in general, they too do the same, but in another way, on other areas.
This is also why I sometimes can feel closer to democrats then conservatives. I need to admit, I rather have the state steal a percentage more of my money than have the state telling me who I can get married with.
And since laws, restrictions and taxes are very easy to impose, but very hard, close to impossible, to get rid of, every step leads towards madness no matter who’s in charge.
Conservatives in general, but religious ones in particular, decrease civil liberties on a personal level. Democrats reduce liberties comes to the economy. Put the two together, which becomes a fact over time, and you get pure totalitarianism.
US of A is going to hell, not literarily of course (there is no such place), and religion is a big part of that.
However, there’s another reason why the country of the serfs is rapidly turning into a scrapheap. This reason is generally contributed to the rightwing of politics. What I am talking about is ‘religion’, and more specifically deeply believing Christians.
Before you read further on you should know I detest all religions. There are thousands of them, each one less believable then the other. And wackiest of them all is scientology - those people should be institutionalized. I also prefer Christianity before Jewish or Islam, but that’s a cultural thing, not a graded scale. I’m sure I would think otherwise if I had grown up in a Jewish or Muslim community.
With this said there are lots of complete morons in the US that not only believe in the Bible and Jesus, but do it literarily and use it both as a guiding star and as an argument in public debates.
Christianity is built upon several well documented lies and, as is the case with all religions, it is based on earlier stories and religions that came before.
The Old Testament for instance is to a large degree stolen from older Sumerian tales. This we know since we have tablets and archeological findings to support it. Some of the biblical stories, like the one about Moses for instance, we don’t have any evidence or historical records of other then from the bible, but as said most of the bible is stolen from other religions and cultures.
And the bible was put together through voting at the Council of Nicaea (325 AD). Some religious leaders got together and voted on what stories that should be included. Many important and even more popular tales was left out because they were too much pro-woman, too much anti-government or contradicted the power of the church.
The entire scripture is filled with complete nonsense no thinking adult can believe in. Worse is that there are a lot of contradictions and passages that if applied would be both anti-democratic and anti-human.
Religious nuts quote certain text that fits their agenda, while other text are ignored or at least not put forward because that would hurt their cause. And so it becomes wrong for two men to have sex, but the text next to it about stoning women doesn’t sound too good so that is not said in the open.
This religiosity also impacts society. Abortion becomes a horrific sin and outlawed, stem-cell research is stopped, gay couples cannot marry, and not going to church in some communities is regarded as the same as committing a crime. Worse still is that it have an impact on what leaders are chosen, why certain wars are a good thing and since according to the bible those in power sits there for a reason, it becomes harder to criticize.
And as we all know, religion makes it easier to hate others, makes it easier to see differences or not care about those with another faith. This in turn feeds racism, antagonism and other forms of collectivism.
And creationism? I mean, please. How can so many idiots in the US buy that shit? Unbelievable.
I know hardly any religious person would agree with me, but to me this is facts and if they are so do they contribute to the decline of America.
I’m not saying we should outlaw religion or that people should stop believing, no, that’s peoples right no matter how stupid it may be. What I am saying however is that religion should be completely left out of politics and how societies are formed. When a religion gets hold of the people it’s almost as bad as socialism.
“Religion is a opiate for the people” - probably the only true thing Karl Marx ever said.
The problem with America is that when progressives take power they increase taxation and reduce individual rights comes to property, liberty and interactions between humans. The state take over more of the economy and the thing that made USA great deteriorates. But when religious people take power or have influence they in turn restrict personal liberties and even if they are not as bad as socialists in infringing on life in general, they too do the same, but in another way, on other areas.
This is also why I sometimes can feel closer to democrats then conservatives. I need to admit, I rather have the state steal a percentage more of my money than have the state telling me who I can get married with.
And since laws, restrictions and taxes are very easy to impose, but very hard, close to impossible, to get rid of, every step leads towards madness no matter who’s in charge.
Conservatives in general, but religious ones in particular, decrease civil liberties on a personal level. Democrats reduce liberties comes to the economy. Put the two together, which becomes a fact over time, and you get pure totalitarianism.
US of A is going to hell, not literarily of course (there is no such place), and religion is a big part of that.
Should incest really be illegal?
A pair of siblings in south east Sweden have been charged with incest and risk facing up to a year each in prison if found guilty. The loving couple, both in their twenties and so adults, live very close to each other but in separate apartments.
Neither party is believed to have been subjected to coercion or violence, but as sex between siblings is illegal both could face time in jail.
My question is why?
Both adults, it was consensual so what’s the problem?
Just because someone happens to put his seamen into the rear, ventral entrance hatch on a sibling, is that a crime?
We do know from research that the risk of inbreeding is great so any offspring may suffer greatly and historically speaking it has been outlawed for the most part for this very reason. Oh, and it is kind of sickening.
However, if a condom was used or any other number of birth-control was in place, is then as horrid? Well, it is still grouse, but is it a crime?
Remember, we’re not talking about a dirty old grandpa with his grabby sweaty palms all over his 12y old granddaughter here. We’re not talking about a parent taking advantage of his/her adolescent kid.
This was two consenting adults.
I do have a hard time seeing the crime, how about you?
Neither party is believed to have been subjected to coercion or violence, but as sex between siblings is illegal both could face time in jail.
My question is why?
Both adults, it was consensual so what’s the problem?
Just because someone happens to put his seamen into the rear, ventral entrance hatch on a sibling, is that a crime?
We do know from research that the risk of inbreeding is great so any offspring may suffer greatly and historically speaking it has been outlawed for the most part for this very reason. Oh, and it is kind of sickening.
However, if a condom was used or any other number of birth-control was in place, is then as horrid? Well, it is still grouse, but is it a crime?
Remember, we’re not talking about a dirty old grandpa with his grabby sweaty palms all over his 12y old granddaughter here. We’re not talking about a parent taking advantage of his/her adolescent kid.
This was two consenting adults.
I do have a hard time seeing the crime, how about you?
What I want to see
I’ve done it all, well close to it, and it surely feels like it. I’ve loved and lost, twice over actually. I’ve traveled, lived in many countries and I’ve seen and experienced more than most people. I’ve slept with more women then I can count and poured more bottles then I care to admit. I’ve tried all the drugs you can name, and then some, and developed an understanding of the world surpassed only by a few. I’ve been beaten up, and have beaten up others. I’ve seen people get killed and I’ve even saved lives. I’ve been shot at and I’ve even eaten two bags of crisps straight without vomiting.
I do admit, I haven’t yet started a family or seen all the countries of this planet. I still have things to do, and things to see, but there’s one particular thing I feel I need to see before I go and meat up with the hooded reaper.
Throughout my life I’ve gathered more experience than I ever thought I would, but do you know what I actually miss?
Do you know what it is?
People getting together and standing up for themselves.
I’ve never seen that.
Why, oh why don’t people care enough, fight enough, get mad enough or love their neighbor enough to actually take a stand?
You idiots out there never do it.
Sometimes in movies you see it, and you can read about it in stories. But that’s all there is - stories. In real life there are no heroes. With the things I’ve seen, heard and read this I can be said with certainty; there are no heroes left in the world.
A hero doesn’t accept the world as it is. A hero lives as the world should be, to show it what it can be. Heroes don’t quit, lay their head down and take it like a good little sheep.
Sadly, I need to admit, I’m not one either. Too afraid, too much of a coward. It is too easy to relax, take a drink and fuck some brunette you just picked up. Very easy.
Maybe that’s it? We’ve become too lazy, too compliant? Or is it just that we don’t give a shit? I’m probably in the latter category. Frankly, I don’t care so much what happens to the rest of you. Why should I? You’re all idiots, pathetic ones at that.
And let’s be honest, the days of the amazing explorer fighting into the jungle or discovering some foreign land isn’t here anymore. We’ve yet to find a way to travel the stars and that 4/5 of the globe covered by water isn’t so fun swimming around in. Besides, when all those excess overindulging stuff exists all around you, why feel the need to?
There’s no problem flying around with the aid of drugs, parachutes or skies. We can get that adrenaline rush by snorting cocaine while banging some hot double D, so why go looking for trouble?
Sure the state is messing up; sure there are still starving and unemployed ass-holes, but who cares?
Right?
Where did our sense of heroism go? Did we ever have one?
I cannot stop pondering on why we live as cattle, as sheep hurdled around by watchful eyes.
Just look at how they punish criminals. Crimes such as rape, theft, abuse and light robbery is hardly punished at all. If there’s jail time, its short, just a couple of years or so. But if you hide your money from the taxation agency, if you carry a gun to defend yourself or if you stand up against government, oh my…
To rape someone gives you a couple of years, to hide a couple of hundreds of thousands in taxes its 5-6 years imprisonment. To attack someone and beat them up is hardly anything else then a slap on the wrist, but if you carry a gun and shot your attacker, then its jail for many years.
It all goes back to making people afraid to stand up for themselves.
It is very subtle for the most part, but it sends a clear message. You only need to look at how they treat people who ignore anti-smoking rules or how individuals that buy sex is handled to see how serious it is when you ignore the righteous agenda of government.
Everyone has been feed from their birth that standing up for rights, freedom and self-perseverance is the worst thing there is. Obeying is the way to go. By obeying you can get ahead, by licking ass you can advance.
We’re also, indirectly, told that if you lie down and take it they will clap you on the head and tell you how good you’d been.
This is how we’re ruled today - by indirect fear.
The powers that be probably learned this from history cos historically speaking those that ruled by direct force have sooner or later been overturned.
Sometimes we can read about how some chap pulled out a family from a burning house or saved a little girl from a carnivorous Polar Bear, but those are exception from the rule and not really what I’m talking about.
I’m talking about rallying people, arm them and storm the castle. I’m talking about pulling out a shotgun when the taxation agency comes to visit.
If someone is sitting huffing from a bong on a public square while nibbling on salty fatty ribs offering their body for payment, that’s their right to do so. And if the police come by to arrest such an individual people around the square should beat the officers into a bloody pulp.
If a restaurant owner is refusing to close according to righteous rules and allows smoking inside and serves his own homebrewed vodka, that’s his right. And if the powers that be send out the military to stop this insurrection everyone in that neighborhood should start throwing molotovs and burn down parliament.
If someone gets jailed for driving without a seatbelt we should break him out of there and if any guard or police gets in the way, they get what’s coming to them.
If the elite want to take our money and hand it over to their rich banking buddies, we should blow up a couple of banks and string up a bunch of politicians in lamp-posts along Main Street.
Not that any of this would ever happen. As said, there are no heroes left in the world.
I know many of you out there have by reading this far put me in the same folder as stone-throwing anarchists and lefties trashing McDonald’s. That’s not what I’m saying.
Listen.
What I mean is that we should protect basic human rights, the right to our own bodies, the right to make our own decisions. Victimless crimes aren’t crimes. If we want to smoke, drink, eat fat, chew down pills or drive our car around our self-illuminating pinkish house until the tank is empty that is our god damn right. If I want to re-name myself Zezhipulickasissi VI or want a real Viking funeral, that is my right.
Those stone-throwing masked morons and the rest of the leftie thugs don’t want to protect human rights, they want to destroy it. To socialists it isn’t enough being slaves and constantly monitored, they want government to go further, to impose more surveillance, to introduce more laws and to hinder any form of individuality. And for some reason they call our current serfdom ‘capitalism’, which is both laughable and very sad.
If the government steals half your money to buy a luxury jet, you have a right to defend yourself with any means possible. Lefties don’t think so; they think government should steal the other half as well so politicians can build a monument or buy another jet. That’s why they throw stones, go to rallies and shout at officials, they want more of the same crap that created all of our problems.
I say we should throw stones, go to rallies and shot at officials every time parliament makes any decision that imposes on our lives. That’s the difference, and it is a huge one.
I wish people would get together and stand up for themselves. To be heroes and fight for what is right. Maybe I’ll see that during or after this current economic depression, but I will not hold my breath.
I do admit, I haven’t yet started a family or seen all the countries of this planet. I still have things to do, and things to see, but there’s one particular thing I feel I need to see before I go and meat up with the hooded reaper.
Throughout my life I’ve gathered more experience than I ever thought I would, but do you know what I actually miss?
Do you know what it is?
People getting together and standing up for themselves.
I’ve never seen that.
Why, oh why don’t people care enough, fight enough, get mad enough or love their neighbor enough to actually take a stand?
You idiots out there never do it.
Sometimes in movies you see it, and you can read about it in stories. But that’s all there is - stories. In real life there are no heroes. With the things I’ve seen, heard and read this I can be said with certainty; there are no heroes left in the world.
A hero doesn’t accept the world as it is. A hero lives as the world should be, to show it what it can be. Heroes don’t quit, lay their head down and take it like a good little sheep.
Sadly, I need to admit, I’m not one either. Too afraid, too much of a coward. It is too easy to relax, take a drink and fuck some brunette you just picked up. Very easy.
Maybe that’s it? We’ve become too lazy, too compliant? Or is it just that we don’t give a shit? I’m probably in the latter category. Frankly, I don’t care so much what happens to the rest of you. Why should I? You’re all idiots, pathetic ones at that.
And let’s be honest, the days of the amazing explorer fighting into the jungle or discovering some foreign land isn’t here anymore. We’ve yet to find a way to travel the stars and that 4/5 of the globe covered by water isn’t so fun swimming around in. Besides, when all those excess overindulging stuff exists all around you, why feel the need to?
There’s no problem flying around with the aid of drugs, parachutes or skies. We can get that adrenaline rush by snorting cocaine while banging some hot double D, so why go looking for trouble?
Sure the state is messing up; sure there are still starving and unemployed ass-holes, but who cares?
Right?
Where did our sense of heroism go? Did we ever have one?
I cannot stop pondering on why we live as cattle, as sheep hurdled around by watchful eyes.
Just look at how they punish criminals. Crimes such as rape, theft, abuse and light robbery is hardly punished at all. If there’s jail time, its short, just a couple of years or so. But if you hide your money from the taxation agency, if you carry a gun to defend yourself or if you stand up against government, oh my…
To rape someone gives you a couple of years, to hide a couple of hundreds of thousands in taxes its 5-6 years imprisonment. To attack someone and beat them up is hardly anything else then a slap on the wrist, but if you carry a gun and shot your attacker, then its jail for many years.
It all goes back to making people afraid to stand up for themselves.
It is very subtle for the most part, but it sends a clear message. You only need to look at how they treat people who ignore anti-smoking rules or how individuals that buy sex is handled to see how serious it is when you ignore the righteous agenda of government.
Everyone has been feed from their birth that standing up for rights, freedom and self-perseverance is the worst thing there is. Obeying is the way to go. By obeying you can get ahead, by licking ass you can advance.
We’re also, indirectly, told that if you lie down and take it they will clap you on the head and tell you how good you’d been.
This is how we’re ruled today - by indirect fear.
The powers that be probably learned this from history cos historically speaking those that ruled by direct force have sooner or later been overturned.
Sometimes we can read about how some chap pulled out a family from a burning house or saved a little girl from a carnivorous Polar Bear, but those are exception from the rule and not really what I’m talking about.
I’m talking about rallying people, arm them and storm the castle. I’m talking about pulling out a shotgun when the taxation agency comes to visit.
If someone is sitting huffing from a bong on a public square while nibbling on salty fatty ribs offering their body for payment, that’s their right to do so. And if the police come by to arrest such an individual people around the square should beat the officers into a bloody pulp.
If a restaurant owner is refusing to close according to righteous rules and allows smoking inside and serves his own homebrewed vodka, that’s his right. And if the powers that be send out the military to stop this insurrection everyone in that neighborhood should start throwing molotovs and burn down parliament.
If someone gets jailed for driving without a seatbelt we should break him out of there and if any guard or police gets in the way, they get what’s coming to them.
If the elite want to take our money and hand it over to their rich banking buddies, we should blow up a couple of banks and string up a bunch of politicians in lamp-posts along Main Street.
Not that any of this would ever happen. As said, there are no heroes left in the world.
I know many of you out there have by reading this far put me in the same folder as stone-throwing anarchists and lefties trashing McDonald’s. That’s not what I’m saying.
Listen.
What I mean is that we should protect basic human rights, the right to our own bodies, the right to make our own decisions. Victimless crimes aren’t crimes. If we want to smoke, drink, eat fat, chew down pills or drive our car around our self-illuminating pinkish house until the tank is empty that is our god damn right. If I want to re-name myself Zezhipulickasissi VI or want a real Viking funeral, that is my right.
Those stone-throwing masked morons and the rest of the leftie thugs don’t want to protect human rights, they want to destroy it. To socialists it isn’t enough being slaves and constantly monitored, they want government to go further, to impose more surveillance, to introduce more laws and to hinder any form of individuality. And for some reason they call our current serfdom ‘capitalism’, which is both laughable and very sad.
If the government steals half your money to buy a luxury jet, you have a right to defend yourself with any means possible. Lefties don’t think so; they think government should steal the other half as well so politicians can build a monument or buy another jet. That’s why they throw stones, go to rallies and shout at officials, they want more of the same crap that created all of our problems.
I say we should throw stones, go to rallies and shot at officials every time parliament makes any decision that imposes on our lives. That’s the difference, and it is a huge one.
I wish people would get together and stand up for themselves. To be heroes and fight for what is right. Maybe I’ll see that during or after this current economic depression, but I will not hold my breath.
Thursday, March 4, 2010
Probably no postings today
I'm getting intoxicated and looking for a good place to live. This task takes time, at least the getting drunk part.
And please let me know if anyone else out there is looking for that desolate place far from all the madness. Preferably somewhere you can grow your own food and not too close to any of the madness about to ensue.
And please let me know if anyone else out there is looking for that desolate place far from all the madness. Preferably somewhere you can grow your own food and not too close to any of the madness about to ensue.
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Chile is yet another example of failure
The country of Chile that recently got struck by several earthquakes is now having problems with looting and an escalation of crimes.
This isn’t surprising. A deeply socialistic country, albeit less so then most other South American countries, cannot handle catastrophes at a satisfactory level.
Yes, compared to the totally leftie mess in Haiti, Chile can build housing better and have a so so infrastructure which reduce the damages, but still there are most likely several hundreds of unnecessary deaths.
Since 1990, successive governments, though left-of-center, have largely maintained the market-based institutions and policies established under the 17-year rule of General Augusto Pinochet. Since getting rid of the dictator and leftie warmogerer Allende, Pinochet changed Chile to a slightly more liberated country.
Today Chile’s income tax rate is well above average, but its corporate tax rate is below average. The top income tax rate is 40 percent, and the top standard corporate tax rate is 17 percent. Other taxes include a value-added tax (VAT) and a property tax. Chile’s regulatory environment means that business takes an average of 27 days to start, obtaining business license demands 20 or more procedures. Bankruptcy procedures can be burdensome and lengthy. In the most recent year, government spending equaled horrific 18.6 percent of GDP! Hence the state of Chile is deeply socialized, but as said not as bad as many other countries.
Anyway, this lack of capitalism has made Chile into a country with many problems, one of which is a deep rooted poverty that comes into effect now after the quakes. Of course the government reacts with putting military on the streets, just as any progressive and collectivistic authority would.
Imagine if the country had followed a more libertarian road. If so no-one would need to loot, fewer houses would have fallen and no extra help would have been needed. The military wouldn’t be out on the street bullying people and all the extra cash available within society could be helping those few in need.
Sadly, as usual, most within media and most pundits outside of Chile complain over the lack of socialism. They say that if poverty was shared, if only people of Chile divided the resources so no-one would work and all investments fled the country, things would be much better. In essence THIS is what they want.
This madness is the opposite-game. Anything bad that actually happens because of too much statism is said to be, by the elitists, because of capitalism. Well, global warming is also a main culprit, but global warming is caused by capitalism so, well, yeah…
They fool you with the manmade global warming hoax, they scam you with GDP-trickery, they steal your money through inflation and they lie to you about how societies and economy works. After that they hand out your money to banks and their pals and say that’s the solution.
Why aren’t you out stringing these people up?
Chile is now suffering from problems they shouldn’t have, worse still is the situation in the deeply socialized Haiti and at the same time the world financial system is going to hell. It can all be traced back to the same problem, but the powers that be are hiding the truth from you, and worse, most of you buy it, which is exactly why things are going to hell.
This isn’t surprising. A deeply socialistic country, albeit less so then most other South American countries, cannot handle catastrophes at a satisfactory level.
Yes, compared to the totally leftie mess in Haiti, Chile can build housing better and have a so so infrastructure which reduce the damages, but still there are most likely several hundreds of unnecessary deaths.
Since 1990, successive governments, though left-of-center, have largely maintained the market-based institutions and policies established under the 17-year rule of General Augusto Pinochet. Since getting rid of the dictator and leftie warmogerer Allende, Pinochet changed Chile to a slightly more liberated country.
Today Chile’s income tax rate is well above average, but its corporate tax rate is below average. The top income tax rate is 40 percent, and the top standard corporate tax rate is 17 percent. Other taxes include a value-added tax (VAT) and a property tax. Chile’s regulatory environment means that business takes an average of 27 days to start, obtaining business license demands 20 or more procedures. Bankruptcy procedures can be burdensome and lengthy. In the most recent year, government spending equaled horrific 18.6 percent of GDP! Hence the state of Chile is deeply socialized, but as said not as bad as many other countries.
Anyway, this lack of capitalism has made Chile into a country with many problems, one of which is a deep rooted poverty that comes into effect now after the quakes. Of course the government reacts with putting military on the streets, just as any progressive and collectivistic authority would.
Imagine if the country had followed a more libertarian road. If so no-one would need to loot, fewer houses would have fallen and no extra help would have been needed. The military wouldn’t be out on the street bullying people and all the extra cash available within society could be helping those few in need.
Sadly, as usual, most within media and most pundits outside of Chile complain over the lack of socialism. They say that if poverty was shared, if only people of Chile divided the resources so no-one would work and all investments fled the country, things would be much better. In essence THIS is what they want.
This madness is the opposite-game. Anything bad that actually happens because of too much statism is said to be, by the elitists, because of capitalism. Well, global warming is also a main culprit, but global warming is caused by capitalism so, well, yeah…
They fool you with the manmade global warming hoax, they scam you with GDP-trickery, they steal your money through inflation and they lie to you about how societies and economy works. After that they hand out your money to banks and their pals and say that’s the solution.
Why aren’t you out stringing these people up?
Chile is now suffering from problems they shouldn’t have, worse still is the situation in the deeply socialized Haiti and at the same time the world financial system is going to hell. It can all be traced back to the same problem, but the powers that be are hiding the truth from you, and worse, most of you buy it, which is exactly why things are going to hell.
Post apocalyptical ramblings
They said the birds refused to sing and the thermometer fell suddenly every time someone mentioned what happened during the Greatest Depression of the first couple of decades of the 2000’s.
No one dared speak aloud about it, as much in the shame as in the sorrow.
Humankind had collapsed along with the markets. War had broken out, terrorism had flourished, and starvation had taken tens of millions of lives.
In the wake of this calamity sicknesses rained. Hospitals, understaffed and with hardly any working equipment, couldn’t handle people that only years before had been healthy. The countryside became littered with mindless hoboes and families looking for work and food. Gangs took over many suburbs and working for the mafia became one of the few ways of surviving.
From this a couple of those funny little men had arisen. As before in history they referred to collectivistic ideas and promised order. People, desperate as they were, listened and before they knew it the reminisces of the post-depression control-grids and built-up police state was in the hands of totalitarian thugs.
For decade’s war raged on in foreign countries. The entire continent of South America was a battle field.
But the states that still had industries also had nuclear power and so didn’t dare to attack each other. This however changed when a Russian oligarch who had claimed the Urals as his personal kingdom launched missiles at Moscow. The retaliation was swift and still today most of western and southern Russia remains uninhabited. The fall-out was also felt in Europe where a civil war was going on in France and Italy. The Euro-zone shattered and domestic terrorism had killed off the last remaining freedoms in pretty much all countries.
A real nuclear war broke out between India and the new Pakistanian hardcore government. And when a Syrian terrorists blow up a nuclear bomb in an Israeli city the Jews leveled all the major Muslim cities surrounding Israel. An estimated 500 million people dead.
The US had broken up in several parts, with skirmishes flaring up now and again. The US war-machine had almost become stranded in overseas countries and had become in part mercenaries and in part brought home to murder their own countrymen.
Worse still had the new flu been. A mutation of older strains with a death-rate equal to the Spanish flu hundred years earlier had swept the globe and with hardly any money or resources to combat this disease four hundred million people had died.
In the endless procession of souls that wanted to be destroyed by statism and fascist rulers millions more had perished.
Humankind had been on the brink of annihilation.
But here we stand, humans, a hundred years later. The world’s population finally starting to recover. A new abundant energy source has just been invented and the growing number of free libertarian states has emerged to reclaim the earth.
We look towards the future and say - this time with real conviction - that we will never let socialism, statism or progressive movements ever again climb to power.
A new dawn for mankind has emerged from the rubbles like the bird phoenix from fire it was born.
Towards the future we toast to the memory of the men and women that saw the disaster coming and warned about it. They were heroes of their time, but it seem that man needed to be cleansed from his collectivistic tendencies one more time before real freedom and prosperity could find its way into the world.
No one dared speak aloud about it, as much in the shame as in the sorrow.
Humankind had collapsed along with the markets. War had broken out, terrorism had flourished, and starvation had taken tens of millions of lives.
In the wake of this calamity sicknesses rained. Hospitals, understaffed and with hardly any working equipment, couldn’t handle people that only years before had been healthy. The countryside became littered with mindless hoboes and families looking for work and food. Gangs took over many suburbs and working for the mafia became one of the few ways of surviving.
From this a couple of those funny little men had arisen. As before in history they referred to collectivistic ideas and promised order. People, desperate as they were, listened and before they knew it the reminisces of the post-depression control-grids and built-up police state was in the hands of totalitarian thugs.
For decade’s war raged on in foreign countries. The entire continent of South America was a battle field.
But the states that still had industries also had nuclear power and so didn’t dare to attack each other. This however changed when a Russian oligarch who had claimed the Urals as his personal kingdom launched missiles at Moscow. The retaliation was swift and still today most of western and southern Russia remains uninhabited. The fall-out was also felt in Europe where a civil war was going on in France and Italy. The Euro-zone shattered and domestic terrorism had killed off the last remaining freedoms in pretty much all countries.
A real nuclear war broke out between India and the new Pakistanian hardcore government. And when a Syrian terrorists blow up a nuclear bomb in an Israeli city the Jews leveled all the major Muslim cities surrounding Israel. An estimated 500 million people dead.
The US had broken up in several parts, with skirmishes flaring up now and again. The US war-machine had almost become stranded in overseas countries and had become in part mercenaries and in part brought home to murder their own countrymen.
Worse still had the new flu been. A mutation of older strains with a death-rate equal to the Spanish flu hundred years earlier had swept the globe and with hardly any money or resources to combat this disease four hundred million people had died.
In the endless procession of souls that wanted to be destroyed by statism and fascist rulers millions more had perished.
Humankind had been on the brink of annihilation.
But here we stand, humans, a hundred years later. The world’s population finally starting to recover. A new abundant energy source has just been invented and the growing number of free libertarian states has emerged to reclaim the earth.
We look towards the future and say - this time with real conviction - that we will never let socialism, statism or progressive movements ever again climb to power.
A new dawn for mankind has emerged from the rubbles like the bird phoenix from fire it was born.
Towards the future we toast to the memory of the men and women that saw the disaster coming and warned about it. They were heroes of their time, but it seem that man needed to be cleansed from his collectivistic tendencies one more time before real freedom and prosperity could find its way into the world.
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
The fascists continue their agenda
The Swedish Justice Mentalist, Beatrice Ask, have called for an oversight into the new surveillance law. Apparently the police was kind of left out, they too need to have greater power to prod, check and monitor us citizens.
As I’ve said before, they will never stop. Once this has been implemented they will expand the laws into the absurd.
We’re already well into an Orwellian nightmare, but for the powers that be it will never be enough.
I once got the lady in question to come and speak at a youth-conference back in 2001 I think it was. She was great. Her topic was about democracy and how we need to protect the few from the oppression of the many. As close to libertarian you can get with any career politician.
I wonder what happened.
Did she get the fascist bug somewhere along the line? Have power corrupted her? I still like her as a person, but as a politician she’s very scary.
As I’ve said before, they will never stop. Once this has been implemented they will expand the laws into the absurd.
We’re already well into an Orwellian nightmare, but for the powers that be it will never be enough.
I once got the lady in question to come and speak at a youth-conference back in 2001 I think it was. She was great. Her topic was about democracy and how we need to protect the few from the oppression of the many. As close to libertarian you can get with any career politician.
I wonder what happened.
Did she get the fascist bug somewhere along the line? Have power corrupted her? I still like her as a person, but as a politician she’s very scary.
The synonym to politics is ‘hypocrisy’
Sweden has a system of household services tax relief. Apparently pretty popular but the leftie opposition has declared it will abolish if it wins the autumn election.
I’m against this idea myself. Don’t get me wrong, I think it is great to lower taxes, but taxation shouldn’t be arbitrary and focused on a particular area. Better to lower them across the board and make them equal no matter what area or market we’re talking about. One particular section of the economy shouldn’t get tax relief when others don’t. That’s just wrong.
Anyway, to no surprise the Social Democrat opposition has several senior politicians that make good use of the system. Do as we say, don’t do as we do.
This isn’t the first time, and certainly not the last. The Social democrats are against private healthcare, but many of them buy their way into private clinics. They are against making rent-apartment into ownership properties, but they buy and sell their own as often they can. They complain over how the “rich” have too much, but if you can name a single household name within that party that can’t be labeled with the epithet “rich” I will eat my laptop.
I don’t like the current administration, too controlling, too fascist, too much central planning and they have bought into the climate scam as well as many other hoaxes they try to force down the public’s throats. I cannot stand the ministers, and the Prime Mentalist looks like a cartoon character. The Swedish leadership should be thrown out of power.
But the hypocrisy of the Social Democrats is just too much. And they do have the ugliest leader ever seen; a person that’s been caught cheating on her taxes and used government credit-cards for her own personal amusement and hired black laborers. How anyone can vote for such shrubs is beyond me.
Not to mention their partners in crime, the communists and the tree-huggers. Lunatics in their own right.
In the end it doesn’t really matter though. The policies are almost identical, only the insane can see any real difference between 1-2% higher or lower taxes – which is the only distinction between the two sides.
All they want is for you to be a good little citizen that vote and don’t mind being constantly under surveillance and say ‘thank you’ when getting pushed around by faceless bureaucrats.
Why even bother with a vote?
In fact the elitist’s only real fear is to not have the silent consent of the general public hence ignoring the ballot is probably the best way of giving it to the man. Well, with the exception of losing their seats of course so if you gonna vote, please vote for the pirates, the so called “racists” or the libertarian party.
I’m against this idea myself. Don’t get me wrong, I think it is great to lower taxes, but taxation shouldn’t be arbitrary and focused on a particular area. Better to lower them across the board and make them equal no matter what area or market we’re talking about. One particular section of the economy shouldn’t get tax relief when others don’t. That’s just wrong.
Anyway, to no surprise the Social Democrat opposition has several senior politicians that make good use of the system. Do as we say, don’t do as we do.
This isn’t the first time, and certainly not the last. The Social democrats are against private healthcare, but many of them buy their way into private clinics. They are against making rent-apartment into ownership properties, but they buy and sell their own as often they can. They complain over how the “rich” have too much, but if you can name a single household name within that party that can’t be labeled with the epithet “rich” I will eat my laptop.
I don’t like the current administration, too controlling, too fascist, too much central planning and they have bought into the climate scam as well as many other hoaxes they try to force down the public’s throats. I cannot stand the ministers, and the Prime Mentalist looks like a cartoon character. The Swedish leadership should be thrown out of power.
But the hypocrisy of the Social Democrats is just too much. And they do have the ugliest leader ever seen; a person that’s been caught cheating on her taxes and used government credit-cards for her own personal amusement and hired black laborers. How anyone can vote for such shrubs is beyond me.
Not to mention their partners in crime, the communists and the tree-huggers. Lunatics in their own right.
In the end it doesn’t really matter though. The policies are almost identical, only the insane can see any real difference between 1-2% higher or lower taxes – which is the only distinction between the two sides.
All they want is for you to be a good little citizen that vote and don’t mind being constantly under surveillance and say ‘thank you’ when getting pushed around by faceless bureaucrats.
Why even bother with a vote?
In fact the elitist’s only real fear is to not have the silent consent of the general public hence ignoring the ballot is probably the best way of giving it to the man. Well, with the exception of losing their seats of course so if you gonna vote, please vote for the pirates, the so called “racists” or the libertarian party.
The Mayflower Project
"I think we need to pack up obama, reid, pelosi and the rest of the libtards and ship them over to GB, then gather up Hannan and the rest of the reasonable, freedom loving people of England (and the rest of Europe for that matter) and bring them over here, a “Prisoner exchange” of sorts.
We need to clean out those with the european mindset and resupply ourselves with those having the “American” mindset, we can call it the “Mayflower Project”" / blogger 'Willie Wonka'
The sixth extinction
Billions of years of life on this planet have gone through several devastating disasters. Scientists have figured out that mass-extinctions have occurred five times before. Each earth-shattering event has destroyed a ¼ or more of all the beings living here.
The question isn’t IF it will happen again, the question is when.
Or maybe the question should be; by what means will this happen?
Homo sapiens are by all accounts a young species. Our kind have only roamed the earth for 200 000 years or so. Even if we during that time have experienced an Ice-age as well as large meteorites crashing and giant volcanoes erupting, we’ve yet to see anything really cataclysmic.
Isn’t it time soon?
The fifth (and latest) major extinction circa 65 millions of years ago eliminated > 17% of families on the planet, including the Dinosaurs. Most likely caused by one (possibly multiple) collisions between Earth and an extraterrestrial body (probably cometary), although some geologists point to a great volcanic event as a possible alternative.
The third major Extinction circa 245 millions of years ago, probably had the same cause as the fifth one, the others is generally regarded to have to do with major, and quite sudden, shifts in climate.
With this in mind it seems that climate change (a real one, not the made-up manmade one) or a large celestial crash should have the lowest odds in Vegas. There are however other possibilities.
Massive solar flare eruptions may both change climate and our geological situation at the same time as such an event would knock out most of our technology. We have cosmic rays from space as a constant threat. Reversal of the magnetic poles (especially if it happens fast) is also a possibility. The introduction of some alien substance, intelligent or not, will also be in this category. Just to mention a few.
But what about ourselves? Couldn’t we do it? Of course we could.
Some mean this is already on the way.
The transformation of the landscape, the overexploitation of species and, of course, pollution is said to contribute to the 30 000 species that go into the light each year. Although such doomsday sayers rarely count the number of new species emerging at the same time or even contemplate that many of those animals would go extinct regardless of human intervention, we can’t really dismiss it either.
My question in this scenario is; who cares? I mean why should be bother with useless animals rendered extinct? I don’t see the point. Only the animals we have use for or the ones who’re vital for ecosystems we depend on should be incorporated into any calculation.
The sixth extinction will only be dangerous if it happens to us, us humans. I don’t care if Polar Bears or any Condor turns into rotting corpses, why would I?
We could talk nuclear holocausts and I do admit it is a possibility, but not very likely one, at least not without other events preceding. It is far more likely that a comet strikes again. But wouldn’t a total break-down of our societies into anarchy, disaster and mass-starvation that will kill tens (maybe hundreds) of millions of people be the worst scenario?
I would think so, and this is also the only real threat. If a comet comes our way today or very soon, maybe we cannot do anything about it. The same goes for solar flares and cosmic rays. But give the human race enough time and we will come up with solid defenses against any such events. I’m absolutely sure about that.
What we don’t have a defense against is ourselves, and here’s where the real threat is.
And I’m not talking any made-up hoax about over-exploitation or the scam of manmade global warming. Such madness has nothing to do with this.
History shows us that the only thing we excel at more than our magical ability to survive and come up with new ways of adapting, is our imagination when it comes to kill each other.
There’s literarily no end to ways of killing other humans. Everything from The iron maiden to socialism, from stoning to The Pear of Anguish to burning people alive.
Instrumental in this task throughout the ages have been government. Not only the only entity able to start wars, it has also, with good aid from Churches and different religions, been the main inventor of torture devices and different ways of execution.
Certainly we can then say in our time and age, with the re-emerging of the state as our main contributor and effecter into human life; that we’re getting into more and more trouble. The bigger and stronger government, the more likely our doom seem.
So when our contemporary societies are heading for social- and economic upheavals with a very likely outcome of bigger and stronger government I cannot help thinking that the sixth extinction is closing in.
If my thoughts about our economic mess holds and the coming years will dwarf the “Great Depression” in severity, and if this leads to, what is usually the case, totalitarian ideas growing and that some of those funny little men with funny little plans comes to power, aren’t we then very close?
Just imagine if we would have had weapons of mass destruction available to all back in the 30’s. How would our world look today if that had been the case?
Personally I would prefer the comet or Alien scenario. At least then we could go out with a bang against an outside threat. Sadly even such an event, if we survived it, would be claimed by government. Surely they saved us? And so we’re back into the circle of expanding government and us closing in on our own destruction.
I think it is very ironic and quite amusing, that the most intelligent species ever evolved on this planet with the ability to survive and thrive only surpassed by the cockroach, will destroy itself. As long as collectivism and statism is growing, that’s the end of the road we’re heading for.
My hope is that we go fast; I’ve always hated long goodbyes. So to you lefties and other lunatics out there; speed it up will ’ya!
The funniest thing I can think of is to sit somewhere, eating popcorn and drinking vodka, watching our doom unfolding. As things go right now, I might get to experience that, if not killed before. So go! Speed it up! Please.
The question isn’t IF it will happen again, the question is when.
Or maybe the question should be; by what means will this happen?
Homo sapiens are by all accounts a young species. Our kind have only roamed the earth for 200 000 years or so. Even if we during that time have experienced an Ice-age as well as large meteorites crashing and giant volcanoes erupting, we’ve yet to see anything really cataclysmic.
Isn’t it time soon?
The fifth (and latest) major extinction circa 65 millions of years ago eliminated > 17% of families on the planet, including the Dinosaurs. Most likely caused by one (possibly multiple) collisions between Earth and an extraterrestrial body (probably cometary), although some geologists point to a great volcanic event as a possible alternative.
The third major Extinction circa 245 millions of years ago, probably had the same cause as the fifth one, the others is generally regarded to have to do with major, and quite sudden, shifts in climate.
With this in mind it seems that climate change (a real one, not the made-up manmade one) or a large celestial crash should have the lowest odds in Vegas. There are however other possibilities.
Massive solar flare eruptions may both change climate and our geological situation at the same time as such an event would knock out most of our technology. We have cosmic rays from space as a constant threat. Reversal of the magnetic poles (especially if it happens fast) is also a possibility. The introduction of some alien substance, intelligent or not, will also be in this category. Just to mention a few.
But what about ourselves? Couldn’t we do it? Of course we could.
Some mean this is already on the way.
The transformation of the landscape, the overexploitation of species and, of course, pollution is said to contribute to the 30 000 species that go into the light each year. Although such doomsday sayers rarely count the number of new species emerging at the same time or even contemplate that many of those animals would go extinct regardless of human intervention, we can’t really dismiss it either.
My question in this scenario is; who cares? I mean why should be bother with useless animals rendered extinct? I don’t see the point. Only the animals we have use for or the ones who’re vital for ecosystems we depend on should be incorporated into any calculation.
The sixth extinction will only be dangerous if it happens to us, us humans. I don’t care if Polar Bears or any Condor turns into rotting corpses, why would I?
We could talk nuclear holocausts and I do admit it is a possibility, but not very likely one, at least not without other events preceding. It is far more likely that a comet strikes again. But wouldn’t a total break-down of our societies into anarchy, disaster and mass-starvation that will kill tens (maybe hundreds) of millions of people be the worst scenario?
I would think so, and this is also the only real threat. If a comet comes our way today or very soon, maybe we cannot do anything about it. The same goes for solar flares and cosmic rays. But give the human race enough time and we will come up with solid defenses against any such events. I’m absolutely sure about that.
What we don’t have a defense against is ourselves, and here’s where the real threat is.
And I’m not talking any made-up hoax about over-exploitation or the scam of manmade global warming. Such madness has nothing to do with this.
History shows us that the only thing we excel at more than our magical ability to survive and come up with new ways of adapting, is our imagination when it comes to kill each other.
There’s literarily no end to ways of killing other humans. Everything from The iron maiden to socialism, from stoning to The Pear of Anguish to burning people alive.
Instrumental in this task throughout the ages have been government. Not only the only entity able to start wars, it has also, with good aid from Churches and different religions, been the main inventor of torture devices and different ways of execution.
Certainly we can then say in our time and age, with the re-emerging of the state as our main contributor and effecter into human life; that we’re getting into more and more trouble. The bigger and stronger government, the more likely our doom seem.
So when our contemporary societies are heading for social- and economic upheavals with a very likely outcome of bigger and stronger government I cannot help thinking that the sixth extinction is closing in.
If my thoughts about our economic mess holds and the coming years will dwarf the “Great Depression” in severity, and if this leads to, what is usually the case, totalitarian ideas growing and that some of those funny little men with funny little plans comes to power, aren’t we then very close?
Just imagine if we would have had weapons of mass destruction available to all back in the 30’s. How would our world look today if that had been the case?
Personally I would prefer the comet or Alien scenario. At least then we could go out with a bang against an outside threat. Sadly even such an event, if we survived it, would be claimed by government. Surely they saved us? And so we’re back into the circle of expanding government and us closing in on our own destruction.
I think it is very ironic and quite amusing, that the most intelligent species ever evolved on this planet with the ability to survive and thrive only surpassed by the cockroach, will destroy itself. As long as collectivism and statism is growing, that’s the end of the road we’re heading for.
My hope is that we go fast; I’ve always hated long goodbyes. So to you lefties and other lunatics out there; speed it up will ’ya!
The funniest thing I can think of is to sit somewhere, eating popcorn and drinking vodka, watching our doom unfolding. As things go right now, I might get to experience that, if not killed before. So go! Speed it up! Please.
The “right” should avoid winning coming elections
I’ve seen similar things argued about different countries, and I will follow up on that and point out that the same goes for Sweden.
The coming years will certainly be very hard, both financially and politically. The debt-mountains, the rampaging inflation, giant bubbles, overvalued markets, commodity manipulations and lots more are right now leading up to the mother crash of all crashes. The tsunami-wave of economic disaster lurking at the horizon will lead to absolute meltdown and will save no-one.
Whoever runs the country will be absolutely crushed as a political entity.
So the general elections coming up in Sweden, as well as UK and the Czech republic during this year will determine not only who will be running these countries but also what political party that will probably not rule again for many decades thereafter.
I will even go so far that the ones leading will be in mortal danger. The extremes of our situation and the worse it gets will make people go postal. People will die. Politicians will die.
In other words, no-one in their right mind would like to lead any country during these circumstances. No matter what anyone does, things will turn into a shit-storm without precedence.
Some of those in charge right now probably know this, but most don’t or trick themselves into believing in the fairytales. Whatever the case, I would urge anyone that doesn’t want to destroy their political and maybe personal future to lose the general elections.
After that blame the other guys. And let’s face it; politicians do the blame-game better than anything else. They are masters at it.
Sadly there are hardly any real “right” parties out there. They are all more or less center-left and there are certainly not any libertarian ideas embraced by any of the mainstream political parties.
But maybe this situation will open up the floor for such parties to come into being? Maybe people realized that the ones warning about the depression and screaming about the faults have almost all been libertarians? Maybe, just maybe there’s hope for the future.
The coming years will certainly be very hard, both financially and politically. The debt-mountains, the rampaging inflation, giant bubbles, overvalued markets, commodity manipulations and lots more are right now leading up to the mother crash of all crashes. The tsunami-wave of economic disaster lurking at the horizon will lead to absolute meltdown and will save no-one.
Whoever runs the country will be absolutely crushed as a political entity.
So the general elections coming up in Sweden, as well as UK and the Czech republic during this year will determine not only who will be running these countries but also what political party that will probably not rule again for many decades thereafter.
I will even go so far that the ones leading will be in mortal danger. The extremes of our situation and the worse it gets will make people go postal. People will die. Politicians will die.
In other words, no-one in their right mind would like to lead any country during these circumstances. No matter what anyone does, things will turn into a shit-storm without precedence.
Some of those in charge right now probably know this, but most don’t or trick themselves into believing in the fairytales. Whatever the case, I would urge anyone that doesn’t want to destroy their political and maybe personal future to lose the general elections.
After that blame the other guys. And let’s face it; politicians do the blame-game better than anything else. They are masters at it.
Sadly there are hardly any real “right” parties out there. They are all more or less center-left and there are certainly not any libertarian ideas embraced by any of the mainstream political parties.
But maybe this situation will open up the floor for such parties to come into being? Maybe people realized that the ones warning about the depression and screaming about the faults have almost all been libertarians? Maybe, just maybe there’s hope for the future.
Monday, March 1, 2010
murder-suicide pact because of global warming
Well, the hundreds of thousands that dies each year because of too high taxes, regulations and laws that has come to be thanks to the manmade global warming scam isn’t enough. Now the idiots are killing off themselves as well.
Daily News:
Police broke into the home after neighbors complained of a stench coming from the house. The boy was found with a gunshot wound in his back, while his parents died from gunshot wounds to the chest.
The parents, 56-year-old Francisco Lotero and 23-year-old Miriam Coletti, are believed to have been spurred by their fears about global climate change, London's Telegraph reported.
Are you kidding me!?
Well, the two idiots we can be without, but to shot their own kids? These are the kinds of morons we’re dealing with. And all of this because of a hoax.
There’s no evidence of manmade global warming. None. Never was, and there never will be. But I do hope more idiots out there do the same as these two. Go and kill yourself before you take others down with you.
Daily News:
Police broke into the home after neighbors complained of a stench coming from the house. The boy was found with a gunshot wound in his back, while his parents died from gunshot wounds to the chest.
The parents, 56-year-old Francisco Lotero and 23-year-old Miriam Coletti, are believed to have been spurred by their fears about global climate change, London's Telegraph reported.
Are you kidding me!?
Well, the two idiots we can be without, but to shot their own kids? These are the kinds of morons we’re dealing with. And all of this because of a hoax.
There’s no evidence of manmade global warming. None. Never was, and there never will be. But I do hope more idiots out there do the same as these two. Go and kill yourself before you take others down with you.
My immoral day
The watch isn’t even 3 pm yet and I’ve already gotten myself drunk and done lots of wicked things. Among those I have bought tobacco to a minor, jail-walked, pointed a middle finger at a police station, had wicked thoughts about high-school girls that walked past me and I’ve swallowed lots of moonshine.
Why? Well, it is Monday and I felt like it.
In the righteous world of the elite this sort of behavior shouldn’t be allowed which is precisely why I love it. Anyone (and most do) can get drunk on the weekend and pick up some stranger to roll around with. Me, I never got that lifestyle. Too expected, too common, too boring.
If you only get one life, which I believe you do, why behave and act like everyone else?
Maybe it’s juvenile acts by a middle aged man, pathetic even. But you see, I don’t care. In a way this is what libertarianism really is; to act, behave, think, and do whatever you feel like without worrying about some common ethic guidelines.
No, I’m not talking about anarchism. But in my opinion and in a libertarian society people should be able to act out their impulses, be out of the norm, dance on the street in mid day or suddenly burst into song, and this without getting fined or having a police officer bring out the teargas. Libertarianism isn’t a lawless ideology; it is just the ideology of freedom of choice.
I try to live as much as I can, in the way I feel appropriate. If this offends anyone, that’s their problem, not mine. As long as I don’t threaten, hurt anyone or break any property laws I believe I can do whatever with my own body and my own time.
The powers that be hate people that think like this, it’s their worst nightmare to have free thinking people that want to control their own minds and body. That’s also why it is important to ignore general ‘moral’ behavior, but, as said, I don’t really care. If you drones out there what to run in that wheel, please do, just don’t expect me to do the same.
Why? Well, it is Monday and I felt like it.
In the righteous world of the elite this sort of behavior shouldn’t be allowed which is precisely why I love it. Anyone (and most do) can get drunk on the weekend and pick up some stranger to roll around with. Me, I never got that lifestyle. Too expected, too common, too boring.
If you only get one life, which I believe you do, why behave and act like everyone else?
Maybe it’s juvenile acts by a middle aged man, pathetic even. But you see, I don’t care. In a way this is what libertarianism really is; to act, behave, think, and do whatever you feel like without worrying about some common ethic guidelines.
No, I’m not talking about anarchism. But in my opinion and in a libertarian society people should be able to act out their impulses, be out of the norm, dance on the street in mid day or suddenly burst into song, and this without getting fined or having a police officer bring out the teargas. Libertarianism isn’t a lawless ideology; it is just the ideology of freedom of choice.
I try to live as much as I can, in the way I feel appropriate. If this offends anyone, that’s their problem, not mine. As long as I don’t threaten, hurt anyone or break any property laws I believe I can do whatever with my own body and my own time.
The powers that be hate people that think like this, it’s their worst nightmare to have free thinking people that want to control their own minds and body. That’s also why it is important to ignore general ‘moral’ behavior, but, as said, I don’t really care. If you drones out there what to run in that wheel, please do, just don’t expect me to do the same.
How can you not love Olivia?
This woman probably has the best singing voice of all time. She was and still is one of the most beautiful women on this planet and her charisma can light up the darkest spots of hell.
If there’s a heaven I cannot think of anyone more suitable to head the welcome song.
And yes, I'd do her…
If there’s a heaven I cannot think of anyone more suitable to head the welcome song.
And yes, I'd do her…
The scam of GDP
Since it is reported today that Sweden shows low (or bad) GDP numbers I feel it necessary to once again point out the total hoax that comes with this measurement.
As long as you people out there buy into what the elitists and their spin-doctors say about GDP we will continue to be screwed.
Before I get into the explanation you need to know that:
LOWER GDP CAN MEAN THAT WE ACTUALLY ARE GETTING RICHER!
HIGHER GDP CAN MEAN (AND OFTEN DO MEAN) THAT WE ARE ACTUALLY GETTING POORER AND THAT OUR WEALTH IS DETERIOATING!!
They are lying to you, and if you take everything they say about GDP for face value there’s no hope for humanity. Really. It isn’t. This scam has gone on for long enough.
GDP is normally calculated as follows:
GDP = private consumption + gross investment + government spending + (exports − imports), or,
GDP = C + I + G + (X − M)
What the equation tells us, among other things, is that if Government spends more, GDP goes up. You probably get this, but what you need to know is that it doesn’t matter what they spend money on. It can be daycare, roads or flowers, it does not matter. According to GDP-calculation it is beneficiary to have people dig holes in ground, fill them up again, and do this over and over.
In fact, this is what government often does, not directly, that would be too obvious, but through other schemes like “investigations” or useless government programs to hide unemployment. An investigation takes manpower, costs money and often leads to conclusions a monkey could tell us beforehand. Anything being done to cover up people’s lack of jobs also cost money. Actually it may cost more, in essence contribute more to GDP, then if people in fact had productive jobs.
With this in mind you probably also realize that bad weather, hurricanes, volcanoes, and forest fires are immensely welcomed by the elitists, at least temporarily. CATASTROPHIES INCREASE GDP!!
The same goes for private consumption. The more we shop ‘till we drop, the higher GDP. In the eyes of Keynesians and our enemies it means that the more stuff you buy, the better.
If you borrow, use your credit-card or work to get that money to spend is irrelevant, what matters is GDP. Low interest rates, the printing of money, making it easier to borrow and other schemes is meant to increase GDP, it is NOT to help the people or make us richer.
Sometimes you can hear one or two voices claiming that savings are too low or that there is a difference in what we actually consume, but those are very few and not nearly as interesting for the media to quote.
As long as you people out there buy into what the elitists and their spin-doctors say about GDP we will continue to be screwed.
Before I get into the explanation you need to know that:
LOWER GDP CAN MEAN THAT WE ACTUALLY ARE GETTING RICHER!
HIGHER GDP CAN MEAN (AND OFTEN DO MEAN) THAT WE ARE ACTUALLY GETTING POORER AND THAT OUR WEALTH IS DETERIOATING!!
They are lying to you, and if you take everything they say about GDP for face value there’s no hope for humanity. Really. It isn’t. This scam has gone on for long enough.
GDP is normally calculated as follows:
GDP = private consumption + gross investment + government spending + (exports − imports), or,
GDP = C + I + G + (X − M)
What the equation tells us, among other things, is that if Government spends more, GDP goes up. You probably get this, but what you need to know is that it doesn’t matter what they spend money on. It can be daycare, roads or flowers, it does not matter. According to GDP-calculation it is beneficiary to have people dig holes in ground, fill them up again, and do this over and over.
In fact, this is what government often does, not directly, that would be too obvious, but through other schemes like “investigations” or useless government programs to hide unemployment. An investigation takes manpower, costs money and often leads to conclusions a monkey could tell us beforehand. Anything being done to cover up people’s lack of jobs also cost money. Actually it may cost more, in essence contribute more to GDP, then if people in fact had productive jobs.
With this in mind you probably also realize that bad weather, hurricanes, volcanoes, and forest fires are immensely welcomed by the elitists, at least temporarily. CATASTROPHIES INCREASE GDP!!
The same goes for private consumption. The more we shop ‘till we drop, the higher GDP. In the eyes of Keynesians and our enemies it means that the more stuff you buy, the better.
If you borrow, use your credit-card or work to get that money to spend is irrelevant, what matters is GDP. Low interest rates, the printing of money, making it easier to borrow and other schemes is meant to increase GDP, it is NOT to help the people or make us richer.
Sometimes you can hear one or two voices claiming that savings are too low or that there is a difference in what we actually consume, but those are very few and not nearly as interesting for the media to quote.
Gather you guns hoist the colors and let’s fight
I don’t fully agree with the blogosphere collecting money for this chap.
I mean fuck it! Collect money to bail-out a man that should be regarded as a hero? We should start shooting at those that thrown him in jail.
I would rather see people arm themselves and break him out or, to take the less violent approach, start their own smoking premises or in other ways ignore the law. If the powers that be need to lock up every other Joe out there, can they then uphold such an unjust law?
...but it is still important to spread the word.
And if you feel the urge to support this poor guy, Old Holborn is among many having a donation-button to click on.
In any case, listen to this music and feel the impact of one of many anger-building unjust fucked-up laws that the elitists want you to follow.
When will it be enough?
I mean fuck it! Collect money to bail-out a man that should be regarded as a hero? We should start shooting at those that thrown him in jail.
I would rather see people arm themselves and break him out or, to take the less violent approach, start their own smoking premises or in other ways ignore the law. If the powers that be need to lock up every other Joe out there, can they then uphold such an unjust law?
...but it is still important to spread the word.
And if you feel the urge to support this poor guy, Old Holborn is among many having a donation-button to click on.
In any case, listen to this music and feel the impact of one of many anger-building unjust fucked-up laws that the elitists want you to follow.
When will it be enough?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)