Swedish officials aren’t pleased with the canon-fodder already in place in Afghanistan with substandard equipment, and so, of course, they’ve decided to send some more troops down to a conflict Sweden has not a single thing to do with.
Apparently we are there “to help”. Not to help the American coalition of war-criminals, oh no, and we are certainly not there to help grow drugs or make terrorist organizations stronger, definitely not, and of course we’re not there to assist a non-democratic woman-hating corrupt regime. This is what we are actually doing, but the facts are ignored.
Instead we get some stories filled with mamby pamby boohooing worthy of any Oscar. When the media show us Swedish soldiers they are helping. A couple of kids that has lost their family to American warplanes gets candy, a stray dog get some water and of course our heroes are confiscating drugs while handing out food and aid to the locals.
Any camel-fellating or shady deals going on in the background is ignored.
If we really are supposed to help, if we really want to win this so called war, why aren’t we sending tens of thousands of soldiers down there? Why aren’t we urging the Americans to use tactical nukes or really put the pressure on? Why won’t we actually act with force, determination and conviction? If we did, the conflict would be over very soon. Since we’re not, the only conclusion anyone with working synapses can draw is that they don’t want to win. Probably with the intention to create more terrorists so when they bomb our cities our masters can impose more of those fascist regulations that are so fun.
Are we really so bent to walk behind British and American unlawful combat-boats?
Is it a phallus thing?
Maybe they just feel that war is fantastic?
Well, While killing people you get phallus shaped rockets and phallus shaped amo fired from phallus shaped rocket-launchers and phallus shaped airplanes. And those phallus thingies go flying through the air making big holes in the sand. Playing with toys that go “boom” is fun shit, too bad some Muslims need to die in the process. Oh well, that can be fun that too. I mean, body parts flying, kids getting their legs cut off, women getting raped, families dying from starvation, millions of refugees. Yapp, great fun...
I’ve been against Swedish (and all the others) participation from the start. Maybe, just maybe USA have some reason to be there, if we believe in the official story, but the rest?
We are dying from a fascist cancer at home, and the only answer we get from on up high is more regulations and more taxes. Why are we sending our people to a foreign land to defend some elusive freedom when our own freedom is deteriorating every day? Why spend money we actually don’t have on a conflict we have nothing to do with when unemployment is very high? Why pretend to want to save female rights when we cannot protect those at home? And even IF those are valid reasons, why the hell aren’t we fighting ‘the good fight’ in any number of other countries with similar or worse regimes that exists around the globe?
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
From the diaries of politics
The government own and controlled Scandinavian airline SAS has announced a new share issue to raise 5 billion kronor ($674 million) as well as a program of cuts and savings designed to save a further 2 billion kronor.
For some reason the current Swedish government, lefties and Keynesians as they are, have decided to buy some of those shares, further making the Swedish people pay for a useless company going down. SAS is among the most expensive (maybe the most expensive) airline out there, their service is lousy and they rarely have the coverage I find useable. Basically it’s a crappy company.
Some have argued that government should take ownership responsibility, but what about responsibility to the tax payers? The voters? The horrible institution of SAS should be sold or go through bankruptcy, which would be the responsible thing to do.
This is what happens when you let politicians control and dictate policies within a company, it goes bad and then taxes need to be thrown at it to “save it”. Not to mention the unfair advantage of getting billions whenever needed...
For some reason the current Swedish government, lefties and Keynesians as they are, have decided to buy some of those shares, further making the Swedish people pay for a useless company going down. SAS is among the most expensive (maybe the most expensive) airline out there, their service is lousy and they rarely have the coverage I find useable. Basically it’s a crappy company.
Some have argued that government should take ownership responsibility, but what about responsibility to the tax payers? The voters? The horrible institution of SAS should be sold or go through bankruptcy, which would be the responsible thing to do.
This is what happens when you let politicians control and dictate policies within a company, it goes bad and then taxes need to be thrown at it to “save it”. Not to mention the unfair advantage of getting billions whenever needed...
Monday, February 8, 2010
Death by government
While the American killing-machine rages on, journalists are trying their very best to keep the Swedish people thinking it’s a good thing for Swedish soldiers to die in a conflict Sweden has nothing to do with.
For some reason it is great that Swedes die on the other side of the world. Probably because, after all, they are protecting a corrupt non-democratic women hating regime and supporting the never ending struggle to murder families and making hundreds of thousands into orphans. How can you not love that?
Or how about the flourishing drug trade that never before has shown such profits? Gotto support that, right? How about the fact that during the 7+ years the world’s strongest navy/army/air force with the world’s most comprehensible intelligence service has ONLY manage to do one thing; create more enemies!
As usual mainstream media are devoted to what the elitists want them to write and say.
Do you know how many wars that have been declared between companies? Between black and white people? Between Women and their children? The answer is; not a single one.
Throughout history the people, not matter who they’ve been, has never declared a single war. You know who has? Government. Government alone has the power to instigate violence against other races or another country. Government alone also is the only entity that has the power to instigate violence against its own citizens.
Death by government – historically speaking, this is the most common way to die
This is also why lefties complaining over the Afghani conflict are only covering up what they really think. Socialism is per definition a government loving ideology. Socialism means more power to authorities and since government is the only entity ‘allowed’ to start wars… well, you probably see were I’m going with that one…
And so the Swedish government has again helped out with the murder of two Swedes. Anyone surprised by this? Our government murders people every day through too high taxation, too overzealous regulations, anti-drug laws, through the manmade global warming scam and countless of other schemes said to protect and help us. As usual politicians only show one hand while hiding the darker, more sinister murderous hand behind their back.
Yes, I know these soldiers volunteered for their assignment and as it seems it may even have been Afghani police that killed them. Those Afghani officers seem to be shooting at everything that moves and reports stream in all the time about civilians getting killed by their own. But does that really matter? It is the Swedish government, with aid and support from all within the elitist agenda that has found it suitable to send soldiers to help US troops slaughter hundreds of thousands of Muslims.
Death by government – why won’t people ever learn?
And even the so called peace-activists that appall any warring have nothing against violence and people getting murdered by authorities. The very same people who say it is wrong to send troops into Afghanistan and is against all form of conflict were two armed opponents are fighting don’t mind to send government thugs to people’s homes in order to jail , hurt and sometimes kill unarmed countrymen.
How many citizens haven’t had their houses confiscated, been shoot by the police or got incarcerated for victimless crimes? Many thousands have this done to them each year just because government is armed, but the normal inhabitant isn’t.
If you don’t believe me, try to stop paying your taxes, refuse conscription or say no to all the mad traffic laws. I mean really stand up for yourself - do you think for a second that your own government has any quandary over beating you down, locking you up and/or hurt you? And if you resist, you can get killed. All of us live under this threat every day, at any second government hired gangsters can storm your home and do whatever they want with you and your property. This is a fact and if you haven’t got that, you live in a different universe far, far away from reality.
Death by government…
My question is; is it worth it?
How many of your countrymen are supposed to die in foreign lands or get murdered by government before you had enough? Is your welfare check so precious to you that you have nothing against the government robbing and maybe kill your neighbor for that money?
It all comes down to the fact that every time you argue for government intervention, no matter how small or how righteous you think it is, you’re really saying you want the government to steal, plunder, hurt, and possible murder for the sake of your opinion. This is the very essence of any moral question ever asked.
Should we mourn the dead soldiers? Absolutely. Should we support their families? Completely! And as long as they are there our soldiers should have the best equipment possible. But that doesn’t change the fact that their blood is on the hands of the politicians that rule us. Sure it may have been an Afghani holding the gun, but if it wasn’t for political decisions, they wouldn’t have been there in the first place.
And let me ask you this: if your only source of income is taken away from you by foreign troops that are, at least indirectly, supporting the war against many of your own people, wouldn’t you be inclined to kill? If your family may die and several of your relatives are hurting, starving, losing limbs and it can to a large degree be traced back to the soldiers said to be there to ‘help you’, wouldn’t you be a little pissed?
We do hear good sounding arguments for us being there, the powers that be always conjure them up, but if those reasons are the ones that made us go there, why aren’t we in China? Sudan? Why aren’t we sending troops to Venezuela? To Mozambique or Indonesia?
A mad Texan religious chimp asked us to go there, and a Marxist lunatic bent on destroying the world economy wants us to stay, is that good enough for you?
Not to me, not in my name!
For some reason it is great that Swedes die on the other side of the world. Probably because, after all, they are protecting a corrupt non-democratic women hating regime and supporting the never ending struggle to murder families and making hundreds of thousands into orphans. How can you not love that?
Or how about the flourishing drug trade that never before has shown such profits? Gotto support that, right? How about the fact that during the 7+ years the world’s strongest navy/army/air force with the world’s most comprehensible intelligence service has ONLY manage to do one thing; create more enemies!
As usual mainstream media are devoted to what the elitists want them to write and say.
Do you know how many wars that have been declared between companies? Between black and white people? Between Women and their children? The answer is; not a single one.
Throughout history the people, not matter who they’ve been, has never declared a single war. You know who has? Government. Government alone has the power to instigate violence against other races or another country. Government alone also is the only entity that has the power to instigate violence against its own citizens.
Death by government – historically speaking, this is the most common way to die
This is also why lefties complaining over the Afghani conflict are only covering up what they really think. Socialism is per definition a government loving ideology. Socialism means more power to authorities and since government is the only entity ‘allowed’ to start wars… well, you probably see were I’m going with that one…
And so the Swedish government has again helped out with the murder of two Swedes. Anyone surprised by this? Our government murders people every day through too high taxation, too overzealous regulations, anti-drug laws, through the manmade global warming scam and countless of other schemes said to protect and help us. As usual politicians only show one hand while hiding the darker, more sinister murderous hand behind their back.
Yes, I know these soldiers volunteered for their assignment and as it seems it may even have been Afghani police that killed them. Those Afghani officers seem to be shooting at everything that moves and reports stream in all the time about civilians getting killed by their own. But does that really matter? It is the Swedish government, with aid and support from all within the elitist agenda that has found it suitable to send soldiers to help US troops slaughter hundreds of thousands of Muslims.
Death by government – why won’t people ever learn?
And even the so called peace-activists that appall any warring have nothing against violence and people getting murdered by authorities. The very same people who say it is wrong to send troops into Afghanistan and is against all form of conflict were two armed opponents are fighting don’t mind to send government thugs to people’s homes in order to jail , hurt and sometimes kill unarmed countrymen.
How many citizens haven’t had their houses confiscated, been shoot by the police or got incarcerated for victimless crimes? Many thousands have this done to them each year just because government is armed, but the normal inhabitant isn’t.
If you don’t believe me, try to stop paying your taxes, refuse conscription or say no to all the mad traffic laws. I mean really stand up for yourself - do you think for a second that your own government has any quandary over beating you down, locking you up and/or hurt you? And if you resist, you can get killed. All of us live under this threat every day, at any second government hired gangsters can storm your home and do whatever they want with you and your property. This is a fact and if you haven’t got that, you live in a different universe far, far away from reality.
Death by government…
My question is; is it worth it?
How many of your countrymen are supposed to die in foreign lands or get murdered by government before you had enough? Is your welfare check so precious to you that you have nothing against the government robbing and maybe kill your neighbor for that money?
It all comes down to the fact that every time you argue for government intervention, no matter how small or how righteous you think it is, you’re really saying you want the government to steal, plunder, hurt, and possible murder for the sake of your opinion. This is the very essence of any moral question ever asked.
Should we mourn the dead soldiers? Absolutely. Should we support their families? Completely! And as long as they are there our soldiers should have the best equipment possible. But that doesn’t change the fact that their blood is on the hands of the politicians that rule us. Sure it may have been an Afghani holding the gun, but if it wasn’t for political decisions, they wouldn’t have been there in the first place.
And let me ask you this: if your only source of income is taken away from you by foreign troops that are, at least indirectly, supporting the war against many of your own people, wouldn’t you be inclined to kill? If your family may die and several of your relatives are hurting, starving, losing limbs and it can to a large degree be traced back to the soldiers said to be there to ‘help you’, wouldn’t you be a little pissed?
We do hear good sounding arguments for us being there, the powers that be always conjure them up, but if those reasons are the ones that made us go there, why aren’t we in China? Sudan? Why aren’t we sending troops to Venezuela? To Mozambique or Indonesia?
A mad Texan religious chimp asked us to go there, and a Marxist lunatic bent on destroying the world economy wants us to stay, is that good enough for you?
Not to me, not in my name!
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Quake update
Lots of earthquakes around the globe above 5.0 on the Richter scale today. Strongest I’ve noticed is Magnitude 5.8 – South of the Fiji Islands. Every time my browser shakes and I can imagine people running around scared. How funny isn’t that?
UPPDATE: Another one around the Fiji Islands just now, 5.9 (revised down to 5.3... go figure..) this time. Something going on out there? Lower depth though, so probably not...
UPPDATE: Another one around the Fiji Islands just now, 5.9 (revised down to 5.3... go figure..) this time. Something going on out there? Lower depth though, so probably not...
Conservatism, ideology and Afghanistan
Being reached by the news that Swedish soldiers have died my first reaction is to feel both sad and proud at the same time. Sad over their families, proud over Swedes fighting for human rights and dying while doing so...
But that only last a second or so - my conservative vein beats shortly.
The problems with conservative thinking are; too much nationalism, too much pride over being whatever you are. And that conservative vein also beat to the wing-flaps of history, tradition and Christian values. Unintentionally this leads to the dark side of collectivism and builds that ‘we against them’ feeling.
So after that second or two I realize why the soldiers really died and I get angry.
Angry because we have no reason being there, none whatsoever.
No one has attacked Sweden. No terrorists have bombed our citizens. No Afghanis have attacked our borders.
There’s no democratic government to protect, and the conflict itself is highly questionable on all fronts.
Did you know that there’s still no proof of Alky Aida having anything to do with the 9/11 thingy? There isn’t, not a single one, at least not officially. And if protecting human rights or females being oppressed is the reason, why the hell aren’t we invading and sending troops into Saudi Arabia? Iran? Indonesia? Most of Africa? And can we really argue that we are much better? There’s no problem finding direct violation against basic human rights in Sweden, the US, UK or any other country.
Should we send troops everywhere? Hell, why not? A World War would be fun, don’t you think?
But when you really think about it, what has traditional conservatism to support in this Afghani conflict? Are we protecting democracy? No. Are we protecting traditions, Swedish history or Christian values? No. Do we really have lots of money to throw away at something like this? No. Do we stand to gain anything from this conflict? No. So what then?
If we really had a reason to fight, if we really were at war and not being the aggressive part, I would probably be one of the first to wave the Swedish flag and sign up to protect my country. However, this isn’t the case here. These soldiers died far away in a conflict we have no reason to be involved in.
I also ponder on why so many support the notion of Swedish troops going to Afghanistan. Are we jealous of Americans having all the fun? Have so many idiots really bought the crap media is selling us? And why have so many, from liberals to conservatives, from social democrats to middle-of-the-road pundits in unison got behind this madness?
It seems that the only ones against are socialists (they want to start their own wars) and libertarians. Well, I know there are some others, but I’m talking about groups of people with a certain political persuasion.
And should a true conservative with the tingling fiscally sound bone really be for this conflict? Is it so nice with flag-waving people? Oh, and that national anthem playing with soldiers defending some elusive ‘honor’ while we hear the sound of huge combat-boots stamping away. Does that get that national feeling going? Or? Is this why conservatives love having Swedish soldiers far away in a conflict we have nothing to do with?
Maybe they just feel that war is fantastic? You get phallus shaped rockets and phallus shaped amo fired from phallus shaped rocket-launchers and phallus shaped airplanes. And those phallus thingies go flying through the air making big holes in the sand. When I was in the army I did see them blowing up 5 tons of old ammunition, that mushroom cloud was a sight for sour eyes I can tell you. So I sort of get it, playing with toys that go “boom” is fun shit, too bad some Muslims need to die in the process. Oh well, that can be fun that too. I mean, body parts flying, kids getting their legs cut off, women getting raped, families dying from starvation, millions of refugees. Yapp, great fun...
What are we doing in Afghanistan again?
And the Swedish Defense Mentalist is saying we should get behind the troops. Wtf!? Another American quote stolen to make us proud over dead Swedes? Of course we are behind them and their families, all of us, but that doesn’t mean that we cannot say that the Defense Mentalist is liable, an idiot and should be blamed for the dead.
We shouldn’t be there!
But that only last a second or so - my conservative vein beats shortly.
The problems with conservative thinking are; too much nationalism, too much pride over being whatever you are. And that conservative vein also beat to the wing-flaps of history, tradition and Christian values. Unintentionally this leads to the dark side of collectivism and builds that ‘we against them’ feeling.
So after that second or two I realize why the soldiers really died and I get angry.
Angry because we have no reason being there, none whatsoever.
No one has attacked Sweden. No terrorists have bombed our citizens. No Afghanis have attacked our borders.
There’s no democratic government to protect, and the conflict itself is highly questionable on all fronts.
Did you know that there’s still no proof of Alky Aida having anything to do with the 9/11 thingy? There isn’t, not a single one, at least not officially. And if protecting human rights or females being oppressed is the reason, why the hell aren’t we invading and sending troops into Saudi Arabia? Iran? Indonesia? Most of Africa? And can we really argue that we are much better? There’s no problem finding direct violation against basic human rights in Sweden, the US, UK or any other country.
Should we send troops everywhere? Hell, why not? A World War would be fun, don’t you think?
But when you really think about it, what has traditional conservatism to support in this Afghani conflict? Are we protecting democracy? No. Are we protecting traditions, Swedish history or Christian values? No. Do we really have lots of money to throw away at something like this? No. Do we stand to gain anything from this conflict? No. So what then?
If we really had a reason to fight, if we really were at war and not being the aggressive part, I would probably be one of the first to wave the Swedish flag and sign up to protect my country. However, this isn’t the case here. These soldiers died far away in a conflict we have no reason to be involved in.
I also ponder on why so many support the notion of Swedish troops going to Afghanistan. Are we jealous of Americans having all the fun? Have so many idiots really bought the crap media is selling us? And why have so many, from liberals to conservatives, from social democrats to middle-of-the-road pundits in unison got behind this madness?
It seems that the only ones against are socialists (they want to start their own wars) and libertarians. Well, I know there are some others, but I’m talking about groups of people with a certain political persuasion.
And should a true conservative with the tingling fiscally sound bone really be for this conflict? Is it so nice with flag-waving people? Oh, and that national anthem playing with soldiers defending some elusive ‘honor’ while we hear the sound of huge combat-boots stamping away. Does that get that national feeling going? Or? Is this why conservatives love having Swedish soldiers far away in a conflict we have nothing to do with?
Maybe they just feel that war is fantastic? You get phallus shaped rockets and phallus shaped amo fired from phallus shaped rocket-launchers and phallus shaped airplanes. And those phallus thingies go flying through the air making big holes in the sand. When I was in the army I did see them blowing up 5 tons of old ammunition, that mushroom cloud was a sight for sour eyes I can tell you. So I sort of get it, playing with toys that go “boom” is fun shit, too bad some Muslims need to die in the process. Oh well, that can be fun that too. I mean, body parts flying, kids getting their legs cut off, women getting raped, families dying from starvation, millions of refugees. Yapp, great fun...
What are we doing in Afghanistan again?
And the Swedish Defense Mentalist is saying we should get behind the troops. Wtf!? Another American quote stolen to make us proud over dead Swedes? Of course we are behind them and their families, all of us, but that doesn’t mean that we cannot say that the Defense Mentalist is liable, an idiot and should be blamed for the dead.
We shouldn’t be there!
Get the hell out of there!
So some of my fellow countrymen have died in battle...
Two Swedish military officers and a local interpreter were killed when their unit came under fire west of Mazar-e Sharif in Afghanistan.
The two Swedish officers, a captain and a lieutenant, and the interpreter were killed in an ambush 40-50 kilometers west of the Swedish army base, in an area where Swedish and Finnish peace-keepers confiscated 70 kilograms of narcotics and a quantity of explosives earlier in the week.
This happens at the same time as Afghan border police killed seven civilians after opening fire on a group of villagers they mistook for fighters, and at the same time as US drones continue to murder civilians in Pakistan.
There are so many wrongs that have been done, are being done and will be done in the near future in the Afghanistan conflict. We could talk about oil, pipe-lines, opium trade blossoming, civilians dying, children suffering and so on.
But you know, even if a vast majority has a negative opinion, that’s still better than having people realizing that the biggest robbery in human history have been committed. Western governments have handed over trillions upon trillions to bankers and other within the enemy class - this need to be hidden away of course.
Also, since the only positive number in the American economy at the moment is military spending, it means that to cut that would decrease GDP…
Money, of course, is also a reason. The protection of valuable oil findings and pipe-lines as well as the drug trade. Arms-dealers, certain banks and some shadowy groups have earned a lot of money from this conflict, and they have no incentive to stop the killing.
The strategy can involve several things, but certainly not to win, as mentioned the US has no intention of winning. Instead one can see the encircling of Iran as a reason for staying, or any of the other above mentioned. So I would argue that the strategy is; to not have a strategy! This isn’t really a war, it’s a conflict at best, a skirmish. If this really was a war and the US really wanted to win, they would destroy any opposition in a matter of weeks.
There is only one way to fight a war. You commit your nation's resources - material and the most precious of all, human - to the complete obliteration of your enemy. You mass those resources against each objective in turn, without reservation, without holding back, without care for collateral damage or world opinion. You do so until your adversary sues for peace, not because it is the political thing to do, not for expedience, but for one and only one reason: they're tired of dying. There is no "armistice" or "cease fire" in a war. There is only victory or defeat. There is only death or life. Collateral damage, including the loss of innocent life, is a known price that will be paid, although the toll is not of concern in that regard - only the certainty that it will occur.
So if America really committed millions of troops, flew in all their support or started to throw tactical nukes around, they would eliminate every single cave, all Taliban’, all terrorists and Bin Laden would be found in bits and pieces, and they would do so in a very short amount of time. Of course tens of thousands of innocent would die and the world opinion would hate America, but they would win the war. As it stands now, 7 years and counting as many as a million plus people may have died, even more so if counting Iraq. The economic cost is staggering and there’s no end in sight.
The US and its buddies need to decide, either end it, or leave. But they don’t want to you see. For the reasons already mentioned and other motives, instead they take what can only be described as the ‘mockery approach’. They bomb some mountains, but not others, effectively only pissing people off, creating more enemies than they had to start with. And the Afghan people are used to fighting an overwhelming enemy, so there’s really no end here.
There are also the soon to be terrorist attacks that will hit one or several targets, such events will probably coincide with worsened public polls for western governments or the next economic crash, so this is yet another reason for this little conflict not to end.
And even if the US have some form of “valid” reason for being there; what the hell are the rest of the countries are doing there? Wasting tax money and showing how much they care about one village while the town next to it is destroyed maybe? Protecting a corrupt anti-women inhuman regime against another corrupt anti-women inhuman regime?
Fuck!
If it is so bloody important to protect female rights and support totalitarian regimes, we have enough of those problems at home. Bring the troops home so they can murder our own citizens instead, would at least be more cost-effective…
Rest in peace and let's hope you dead guys are the last ones coming home in coffins.
Two Swedish military officers and a local interpreter were killed when their unit came under fire west of Mazar-e Sharif in Afghanistan.
The two Swedish officers, a captain and a lieutenant, and the interpreter were killed in an ambush 40-50 kilometers west of the Swedish army base, in an area where Swedish and Finnish peace-keepers confiscated 70 kilograms of narcotics and a quantity of explosives earlier in the week.
This happens at the same time as Afghan border police killed seven civilians after opening fire on a group of villagers they mistook for fighters, and at the same time as US drones continue to murder civilians in Pakistan.
There are so many wrongs that have been done, are being done and will be done in the near future in the Afghanistan conflict. We could talk about oil, pipe-lines, opium trade blossoming, civilians dying, children suffering and so on.
But you know, even if a vast majority has a negative opinion, that’s still better than having people realizing that the biggest robbery in human history have been committed. Western governments have handed over trillions upon trillions to bankers and other within the enemy class - this need to be hidden away of course.
Also, since the only positive number in the American economy at the moment is military spending, it means that to cut that would decrease GDP…
Money, of course, is also a reason. The protection of valuable oil findings and pipe-lines as well as the drug trade. Arms-dealers, certain banks and some shadowy groups have earned a lot of money from this conflict, and they have no incentive to stop the killing.
The strategy can involve several things, but certainly not to win, as mentioned the US has no intention of winning. Instead one can see the encircling of Iran as a reason for staying, or any of the other above mentioned. So I would argue that the strategy is; to not have a strategy! This isn’t really a war, it’s a conflict at best, a skirmish. If this really was a war and the US really wanted to win, they would destroy any opposition in a matter of weeks.
There is only one way to fight a war. You commit your nation's resources - material and the most precious of all, human - to the complete obliteration of your enemy. You mass those resources against each objective in turn, without reservation, without holding back, without care for collateral damage or world opinion. You do so until your adversary sues for peace, not because it is the political thing to do, not for expedience, but for one and only one reason: they're tired of dying. There is no "armistice" or "cease fire" in a war. There is only victory or defeat. There is only death or life. Collateral damage, including the loss of innocent life, is a known price that will be paid, although the toll is not of concern in that regard - only the certainty that it will occur.
So if America really committed millions of troops, flew in all their support or started to throw tactical nukes around, they would eliminate every single cave, all Taliban’, all terrorists and Bin Laden would be found in bits and pieces, and they would do so in a very short amount of time. Of course tens of thousands of innocent would die and the world opinion would hate America, but they would win the war. As it stands now, 7 years and counting as many as a million plus people may have died, even more so if counting Iraq. The economic cost is staggering and there’s no end in sight.
The US and its buddies need to decide, either end it, or leave. But they don’t want to you see. For the reasons already mentioned and other motives, instead they take what can only be described as the ‘mockery approach’. They bomb some mountains, but not others, effectively only pissing people off, creating more enemies than they had to start with. And the Afghan people are used to fighting an overwhelming enemy, so there’s really no end here.
There are also the soon to be terrorist attacks that will hit one or several targets, such events will probably coincide with worsened public polls for western governments or the next economic crash, so this is yet another reason for this little conflict not to end.
And even if the US have some form of “valid” reason for being there; what the hell are the rest of the countries are doing there? Wasting tax money and showing how much they care about one village while the town next to it is destroyed maybe? Protecting a corrupt anti-women inhuman regime against another corrupt anti-women inhuman regime?
Fuck!
If it is so bloody important to protect female rights and support totalitarian regimes, we have enough of those problems at home. Bring the troops home so they can murder our own citizens instead, would at least be more cost-effective…
Rest in peace and let's hope you dead guys are the last ones coming home in coffins.
Saturday, February 6, 2010
I don’t like Sarah Palin
I don’t like Sarah Palin. Too religious, too flaky in a stupid way and in she is a part of the elitist establishment that the Tea Party is against, or should be against.
So I don’t get it why she spoke at the Tea Party convent, she shouldn’t have been there; she’s rather a part of the problem than any kind of solution of it.
Watch her speach here:
This is one of the main problems facing this grassroots movement looking to shake up Washington; they are to a certain extent missing the point. They are still one of the best things that ever happened to America and you gotto salute 2 million strong demonstrators even though mainstream media hardly even mentioned the biggest protest rally that ever hit the streets of the capital. But they do have a problem.
The problem is that many of them still think this can be resolved through electing the right kind of ‘conservatives’ or scream high enough and things will change. This is totally wrong. No Sarah, no Ronald or Paul can save America as it looks now; the country needs a second revolution, a real one, not a handing-out-pamphlets-and-rally-revolution, but a real one. Not necessarily an armed revolution, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it comes to that.
1913 with the Federal Reserve act really started the whole mess, but during the latest decades things have escalated and today I would regard my birth nation, Sweden, as a more free minded and less fascist country, and that says something.
America isn’t the home of the free and brave, haven’t been for many years. America is the home of the serfs, the controlled, the overtaxed, home of the anti-Muslim war machine and home of the religious nut-jobs. The US of A is the place where the biggest bank robbery in history has just taken place and what do people do? They vote for the same puppet masters that orchestrated the whole thing.
The two party system is a scam and the president and congress all work for and sleep with big business and the banking cartel. What once was the bread-basket and most producing country in the world is now reduced to fatty consumerism and lazy borrowing to pay for it.
I am generalizing of course, such a diverse country with 300+ million people cannot be reduced to a couple of sentences, but I’m angry. America was the hope, the place of refuge, a shining beacon of light in a dark socialist world. Now special interests, socially aware conservatives (fascists) and Democrats (Marxists) have turned this country into a GramscoFabiaNazi nightmare, an Orwellian society closing in on totalitarianism more and more each day.
This cannot be resolved by exchanging democrats for republicans or vice versa. They are all in cahoots. And this is why Sarah Palin isn’t a part of the solution; she’s a part of the problem. The only really good thing about the woman is that she wants to kill some Polar Bears, gotto love that.
A coincident?
So I don’t get it why she spoke at the Tea Party convent, she shouldn’t have been there; she’s rather a part of the problem than any kind of solution of it.
Watch her speach here:
This is one of the main problems facing this grassroots movement looking to shake up Washington; they are to a certain extent missing the point. They are still one of the best things that ever happened to America and you gotto salute 2 million strong demonstrators even though mainstream media hardly even mentioned the biggest protest rally that ever hit the streets of the capital. But they do have a problem.
The problem is that many of them still think this can be resolved through electing the right kind of ‘conservatives’ or scream high enough and things will change. This is totally wrong. No Sarah, no Ronald or Paul can save America as it looks now; the country needs a second revolution, a real one, not a handing-out-pamphlets-and-rally-revolution, but a real one. Not necessarily an armed revolution, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it comes to that.
1913 with the Federal Reserve act really started the whole mess, but during the latest decades things have escalated and today I would regard my birth nation, Sweden, as a more free minded and less fascist country, and that says something.
America isn’t the home of the free and brave, haven’t been for many years. America is the home of the serfs, the controlled, the overtaxed, home of the anti-Muslim war machine and home of the religious nut-jobs. The US of A is the place where the biggest bank robbery in history has just taken place and what do people do? They vote for the same puppet masters that orchestrated the whole thing.
The two party system is a scam and the president and congress all work for and sleep with big business and the banking cartel. What once was the bread-basket and most producing country in the world is now reduced to fatty consumerism and lazy borrowing to pay for it.
I am generalizing of course, such a diverse country with 300+ million people cannot be reduced to a couple of sentences, but I’m angry. America was the hope, the place of refuge, a shining beacon of light in a dark socialist world. Now special interests, socially aware conservatives (fascists) and Democrats (Marxists) have turned this country into a GramscoFabiaNazi nightmare, an Orwellian society closing in on totalitarianism more and more each day.
This cannot be resolved by exchanging democrats for republicans or vice versa. They are all in cahoots. And this is why Sarah Palin isn’t a part of the solution; she’s a part of the problem. The only really good thing about the woman is that she wants to kill some Polar Bears, gotto love that.
A coincident?
Why a ‘terrorist’ attack is imminent
I want you to think about something.
There are some 300 000 Americans of Pakistani origins living in the US alone. And imagine how many millions of Iraqis, Pakistanis, Afghanis etc that are living all over the western world. Add in refugees and immigrants and all those who appall the wars going on in Muslim countries, throw in some economic disasters (more lurking behind the corner) and sprinkle over resentments, unemployment and how the elitist enemy class keep screwing average citizens on a daily basis.
And when you have done this in your mind, watch this video and tell me what the future has installed for us…
… and can you really, really blame them for planning soon to be executed terrorist actions?
9/11 was horrible, and maybe the US had the right to strike back, but if so; at what cost? How many millions of Muslims is okay to kill before that attack is revenged? How many trillions of dollars is enough? How many more countries invaded? How many more civil liberties should we give up?
The terrorists are winning the war, and they really don’t haft to do a damn thing - the US war machine is doing it for them. And many other countries are guilty for aiding and abiding.
There are some 300 000 Americans of Pakistani origins living in the US alone. And imagine how many millions of Iraqis, Pakistanis, Afghanis etc that are living all over the western world. Add in refugees and immigrants and all those who appall the wars going on in Muslim countries, throw in some economic disasters (more lurking behind the corner) and sprinkle over resentments, unemployment and how the elitist enemy class keep screwing average citizens on a daily basis.
And when you have done this in your mind, watch this video and tell me what the future has installed for us…
… and can you really, really blame them for planning soon to be executed terrorist actions?
9/11 was horrible, and maybe the US had the right to strike back, but if so; at what cost? How many millions of Muslims is okay to kill before that attack is revenged? How many trillions of dollars is enough? How many more countries invaded? How many more civil liberties should we give up?
The terrorists are winning the war, and they really don’t haft to do a damn thing - the US war machine is doing it for them. And many other countries are guilty for aiding and abiding.
The great messiah’s socialist promises
The US pick-pocket in Chief Barack H Obama has now asked Congress to temporarily expand two lending programs for the owners of small businesses. And who does the great potentate steal this money from? That’s right, from the same businesses he’s out to help.
The scam continues and the sandcastle is about to be swept away by the depressional tsunami wave of utter financial disaster lurking over the horizon.
The scam continues and the sandcastle is about to be swept away by the depressional tsunami wave of utter financial disaster lurking over the horizon.
The gay within awaken
Tonight is one of many nights of Swedish try-outs to the Eurovision Song Contest. In several semi-finals a bunch of songs will be elected to go through to the Swedish final whereas a winner will be proclaimed and then sent to the European final.
I love this crap!
I truly do. And it not just the glamour, glitter and bad singing that does it, it is also one of those times you can go all out and be really, really gay.
I’m generally a pretty manly guy. Been in plenty of bar-fights, I love vodka, have lots of chest-hair and have slept more women than I can count. I love the outdoors; guns and any decent engine roaring make me hard. But as any self-respecting man I can also appreciate a finger up my rectum as well as Eurovision.
Well, you don’t haft to be gay or know a lot of gay folks to love Eurovision, but it helps.
Besides, many of the best songs ever heard have been a part of this magnificent spectacle.
This is one of those:
At the Swedish tryouts to the Eurovision song contest 1995 this song happened to end up at 2nd place. My disillusion with the human race might actually have been confirmed and strengthen that night, why didn’t it win!?
Cecilia is singing about the most beautiful moment; with the one you love beside you, waking up a morning with the fog going away and a new day arriving. Listen and enjoy to pictures from Sweden. I will now start to prepare for this year’s tryouts by doing what I do best; drinking a lot of vodka.
The song is called: “Det vackraste” which means = the most beautiful
Lyrics translated from Swedish
The most beautiful thing I know
Is to watch you when you're sleeping
It's quiet and peaceful here
And I forget both space and time
You're lying here beside me
And can I feel you, breathing
To be loved by you
Is the most beautiful thing for me
How fairytale-like it is
To see the morning mist rise
When darkness slowly flees
And see the break of day
A cool morning breeze
Slowly sweeps through the room
I cuddle close to you
Happy that you exist
Moments of silence
A moment of quiet once in a while
Moments of happiness
To simply have each other
It is a great wealth
To love and be loved
The gentleness of our love
Is the most beautiful thing I know
The most beautiful thing there is
Is to be close to someone
When the moon is shining brightly
Over forests and fields, so wonderful
You're lying here beside me
And can I feel you, breathing
To be loved by you
Is the most beautiful thing for me
Moments of silence
A moment of quiet once in a while
Moments of happiness
To simply have each other
It is a great wealth
To love and be loved
The gentleness of our love
Is the most beautiful thing I know
You're lying here beside me
And can I feel you, breathing
To be loved by you
Is the most beautiful thing for me
I love this crap!
I truly do. And it not just the glamour, glitter and bad singing that does it, it is also one of those times you can go all out and be really, really gay.
I’m generally a pretty manly guy. Been in plenty of bar-fights, I love vodka, have lots of chest-hair and have slept more women than I can count. I love the outdoors; guns and any decent engine roaring make me hard. But as any self-respecting man I can also appreciate a finger up my rectum as well as Eurovision.
Well, you don’t haft to be gay or know a lot of gay folks to love Eurovision, but it helps.
Besides, many of the best songs ever heard have been a part of this magnificent spectacle.
This is one of those:
At the Swedish tryouts to the Eurovision song contest 1995 this song happened to end up at 2nd place. My disillusion with the human race might actually have been confirmed and strengthen that night, why didn’t it win!?
Cecilia is singing about the most beautiful moment; with the one you love beside you, waking up a morning with the fog going away and a new day arriving. Listen and enjoy to pictures from Sweden. I will now start to prepare for this year’s tryouts by doing what I do best; drinking a lot of vodka.
The song is called: “Det vackraste” which means = the most beautiful
Lyrics translated from Swedish
The most beautiful thing I know
Is to watch you when you're sleeping
It's quiet and peaceful here
And I forget both space and time
You're lying here beside me
And can I feel you, breathing
To be loved by you
Is the most beautiful thing for me
How fairytale-like it is
To see the morning mist rise
When darkness slowly flees
And see the break of day
A cool morning breeze
Slowly sweeps through the room
I cuddle close to you
Happy that you exist
Moments of silence
A moment of quiet once in a while
Moments of happiness
To simply have each other
It is a great wealth
To love and be loved
The gentleness of our love
Is the most beautiful thing I know
The most beautiful thing there is
Is to be close to someone
When the moon is shining brightly
Over forests and fields, so wonderful
You're lying here beside me
And can I feel you, breathing
To be loved by you
Is the most beautiful thing for me
Moments of silence
A moment of quiet once in a while
Moments of happiness
To simply have each other
It is a great wealth
To love and be loved
The gentleness of our love
Is the most beautiful thing I know
You're lying here beside me
And can I feel you, breathing
To be loved by you
Is the most beautiful thing for me
The lying reaches new heights
Today we’re told that Sweden is lagging behind, that our GDP isn’t growing as much as many other countries and that our income is faulting because of fewer exports.
All of this is built upon the lie that is GDP.
You see when export goes down in relation to import GDP goes down and vice versa when export goes up in relation to import GDP goes up. This is one of many scams that come with GDP-calculation.
I’ve revealed this bluff here on this blog before on many occasions so if you wish you can go back and read about it, but know this: GDP measures wealth and income about as accurate as blind man can pick out his relatives in a huge gathering four miles away.
So every time any journalist, politician or pundit picks up the GDP-rabbit and wave it around like a magic trick you should be very wary about what that con-artist is saying.
FACT! We can get wealthier even though GDP goes down.
FACT! We can get poorer (and this is very often the case) even though GDP goes up.
The truth is that Sweden, although in bad shape, stands on much more solid ground than most other western nations. We are not deeply in-debt (even though the central bank do it’s very best to make us slaves to more debt), our unemployment figures are not hidden away to the same degree as in other countries, our stock exchange isn’t 50% overvalued like the American one, and we still have a lot of industry and real wealth-creating companies within our borders.
There are other not-so-bad things about my birth nation, but the point is that things are not as bad in comparison as GDP numbers might show. If it wasn’t for our deep dependence on foreign trade we would sail pretty easy through the looming depression that is about to hit the world.
So why do media try to sell us another picture?
Well, there are two reasons for this.
Firstly, and probably most important, is that media have deep, very deep connections and ties to socialism. The entire journalistic landscape is pretty much an echo of the Soviet Union or other totalitarian leftie regimes. I know it is bad in many countries, but journalists in Sweden will be on the top on any kind of list. They are the laziest, most overpaid, useless bunch of (socialist)regime-devoted thugs you can imagine. Even the so called “right-wing” papers are really only one step away from Lenin’s wet dream. These spokespersons of statism will do anything to get back the socialist/communist/tree-hugging government they love so much hence anything bad cabled out will be another nail for the current administration.
Secondly there are so many Keynesians out there and they hate that Sweden haven’t committed as much to the maniac spending-spree and outrageous money-printing all others have. They need to prove how bad it is to not borrow, not to print, and not to spend trillions on useless things.
Here comes another mad consequence of GDP calculation into play. Whenever government spends, GDP goes up. And the funny thing is; it doesn’t matter on what they spend the money on! They can have people digging dirt, shoveling growl from left to right, produce 53 trillion left shoes, it does not matter - it all ends up as a positive comes to GDP.
And this is what they are trying to sell now. If Government don’t get its act together and start wasting massive amount of money, Sweden will fall behind… cry… cry…
Oh, and don’t think for a second I like the current Swedish government, I don’t, they are idiots. But there’s a degree difference within the asylum, and if you listen to all of this crying you will soon find that you’ve given them the key to the door and the really insane will roam free.
Don’t listen to a word of what the elitists are saying, it’s all lies and insane ramblings.
All of this is built upon the lie that is GDP.
You see when export goes down in relation to import GDP goes down and vice versa when export goes up in relation to import GDP goes up. This is one of many scams that come with GDP-calculation.
I’ve revealed this bluff here on this blog before on many occasions so if you wish you can go back and read about it, but know this: GDP measures wealth and income about as accurate as blind man can pick out his relatives in a huge gathering four miles away.
So every time any journalist, politician or pundit picks up the GDP-rabbit and wave it around like a magic trick you should be very wary about what that con-artist is saying.
FACT! We can get wealthier even though GDP goes down.
FACT! We can get poorer (and this is very often the case) even though GDP goes up.
The truth is that Sweden, although in bad shape, stands on much more solid ground than most other western nations. We are not deeply in-debt (even though the central bank do it’s very best to make us slaves to more debt), our unemployment figures are not hidden away to the same degree as in other countries, our stock exchange isn’t 50% overvalued like the American one, and we still have a lot of industry and real wealth-creating companies within our borders.
There are other not-so-bad things about my birth nation, but the point is that things are not as bad in comparison as GDP numbers might show. If it wasn’t for our deep dependence on foreign trade we would sail pretty easy through the looming depression that is about to hit the world.
So why do media try to sell us another picture?
Well, there are two reasons for this.
Firstly, and probably most important, is that media have deep, very deep connections and ties to socialism. The entire journalistic landscape is pretty much an echo of the Soviet Union or other totalitarian leftie regimes. I know it is bad in many countries, but journalists in Sweden will be on the top on any kind of list. They are the laziest, most overpaid, useless bunch of (socialist)regime-devoted thugs you can imagine. Even the so called “right-wing” papers are really only one step away from Lenin’s wet dream. These spokespersons of statism will do anything to get back the socialist/communist/tree-hugging government they love so much hence anything bad cabled out will be another nail for the current administration.
Secondly there are so many Keynesians out there and they hate that Sweden haven’t committed as much to the maniac spending-spree and outrageous money-printing all others have. They need to prove how bad it is to not borrow, not to print, and not to spend trillions on useless things.
Here comes another mad consequence of GDP calculation into play. Whenever government spends, GDP goes up. And the funny thing is; it doesn’t matter on what they spend the money on! They can have people digging dirt, shoveling growl from left to right, produce 53 trillion left shoes, it does not matter - it all ends up as a positive comes to GDP.
And this is what they are trying to sell now. If Government don’t get its act together and start wasting massive amount of money, Sweden will fall behind… cry… cry…
Oh, and don’t think for a second I like the current Swedish government, I don’t, they are idiots. But there’s a degree difference within the asylum, and if you listen to all of this crying you will soon find that you’ve given them the key to the door and the really insane will roam free.
Don’t listen to a word of what the elitists are saying, it’s all lies and insane ramblings.
Decomposing corpses
Apparently Sweden is the country that saves the dead the longest before putting them down with friendly nibbling worms and insects. One of many reasons for this delay is that Medical personnel wait too long with sending in the necessary required document to the tax agency. You see in Sweden the most important thing is to let the government know you’re really dead so there are no discrepancies in regards to taxation.
So for this and a couple of other reasons laying the cadaver to rest takes up to several weeks longer in Sweden than in most other countries.
Not that I myself really care, a dead carcass isn’t really going anywhere and people who let their remains lay about pretty much intact are stupid anyways. Incineration is the only way to go.
I would love to have a proper Viking burial myself, but that is of course illegal - some other government bureau has decided this. And since yet another government entity is in charge of where we can be buried, how, and during what religious superstitious rite, and yet another government entity makes you pay tax for funeral arrangement… well… let’s just say that when that day comes, I’ll be glad to be gone…
So for this and a couple of other reasons laying the cadaver to rest takes up to several weeks longer in Sweden than in most other countries.
Not that I myself really care, a dead carcass isn’t really going anywhere and people who let their remains lay about pretty much intact are stupid anyways. Incineration is the only way to go.
I would love to have a proper Viking burial myself, but that is of course illegal - some other government bureau has decided this. And since yet another government entity is in charge of where we can be buried, how, and during what religious superstitious rite, and yet another government entity makes you pay tax for funeral arrangement… well… let’s just say that when that day comes, I’ll be glad to be gone…
It was just a matter of time
Lund University in southern Sweden is apparently trying to impose restriction for blogging about campus life. Religion, politics and too negative stuff about other students and teachers are disallowed. Since the students are official spokespersons for the university the heads of the academia feel it is imperative to quench any ‘offensive’ talk.
This is the righteous and sneaky approach and these people probably don’t even realize what this means. I would also guess there are a lot of you out there that really don’t mind, shouldn’t they be restricted in this manor when writing for and about the university they are at?
Well, what if the university discriminates against Muslims or Jews, shouldn’t that be acknowledged? What if the campus is badly run? Isn’t that something potential student should know about? What about the lack of housing? It can take many months to get a decent accommodation; any would-be attendee should have that information, no? And this is a publically paid for institution, why should students be banned from writing whatever?
What should be worrisome are the next steps and the spilling-over effect. If students aren’t allowed to write about politics and religion (that incorporate pretty much everything) on the university server, won’t this effect how they act in private? If you study at a certain institution that has outlawed certain opinions and topics it will affect how you write your own blog. It’s only natural. Also, as a former student union president, I can tell you that certain teachers will punish any “wrong views” and many will know this and adjust accordingly.
And whatever happened to free speech? Isn’t universities supposed to encourage free thinking and debate?
But the real problem is how this fits in with all the rest.
I’ve many times written about how media and pundits continuously report about and scare us with ‘news’ that crimes are committed and planned everywhere in cyberspace, how terrorists send email to each other, how horrible hackers steal grandmas savings, and how any teenage daughter are helplessly picked up by predators each time she sits down in front of a computer.
Not a single day goes by without papers telling us about the latest online-con whereas tricksters scam unsuspected people to give up their bank-statements and home address. News stations cable out daily how piracy is and should be combated. And ‘Grooming’… it all comes back to the Childreeeeen, doesn’t it? If we were to believe the righteous elitists then every man logging on is a drooling kiddy-porn fanatic.
So I regard this little university hindrance as yet another step on this totalitarian road.
Of course there will be some loud voices about this, maybe the university even will take a step back as a consequence, but you see it does not matter. The issue has been raised, the seed has been planted. Soon another institution will follow, then another. After that there will be more restrictions, probably on a national level. And so it goes on in a never ending expanding fascist wet dream.
This is how the system works. Baby-steps that together form a cohesive whole.
This is the righteous and sneaky approach and these people probably don’t even realize what this means. I would also guess there are a lot of you out there that really don’t mind, shouldn’t they be restricted in this manor when writing for and about the university they are at?
Well, what if the university discriminates against Muslims or Jews, shouldn’t that be acknowledged? What if the campus is badly run? Isn’t that something potential student should know about? What about the lack of housing? It can take many months to get a decent accommodation; any would-be attendee should have that information, no? And this is a publically paid for institution, why should students be banned from writing whatever?
What should be worrisome are the next steps and the spilling-over effect. If students aren’t allowed to write about politics and religion (that incorporate pretty much everything) on the university server, won’t this effect how they act in private? If you study at a certain institution that has outlawed certain opinions and topics it will affect how you write your own blog. It’s only natural. Also, as a former student union president, I can tell you that certain teachers will punish any “wrong views” and many will know this and adjust accordingly.
And whatever happened to free speech? Isn’t universities supposed to encourage free thinking and debate?
But the real problem is how this fits in with all the rest.
I’ve many times written about how media and pundits continuously report about and scare us with ‘news’ that crimes are committed and planned everywhere in cyberspace, how terrorists send email to each other, how horrible hackers steal grandmas savings, and how any teenage daughter are helplessly picked up by predators each time she sits down in front of a computer.
Not a single day goes by without papers telling us about the latest online-con whereas tricksters scam unsuspected people to give up their bank-statements and home address. News stations cable out daily how piracy is and should be combated. And ‘Grooming’… it all comes back to the Childreeeeen, doesn’t it? If we were to believe the righteous elitists then every man logging on is a drooling kiddy-porn fanatic.
So I regard this little university hindrance as yet another step on this totalitarian road.
Of course there will be some loud voices about this, maybe the university even will take a step back as a consequence, but you see it does not matter. The issue has been raised, the seed has been planted. Soon another institution will follow, then another. After that there will be more restrictions, probably on a national level. And so it goes on in a never ending expanding fascist wet dream.
This is how the system works. Baby-steps that together form a cohesive whole.
Friday, February 5, 2010
I understand Russia
In what the Russian president Medvedev calls "The New Russian Defence Doctrine", a program of sweeping reforms is set to be completed by 2020. While a massive modernization of Russia's nuclear strike capability is given headline treatment, the really significant changes affect other aspects of the military structure.
The new doctrine is prompted, at least in part, by three fears; none of which involves a hypothetical war with Nato. No one in Moscow believes such a war is even remotely probable (even though several Swedish papers are writing about it…).
Under the new doctrine, Russia's armed forces, now numbering almost two million, will be cut by almost half. Instead, there will be a massive increase in modern equipment.
As a Swede and consequently a part of the country that historically speaking been warring with Russia more than anyone else, you might assume I would regard this is a threat or ’changed’ form of threat, but then you would be wrong.
And yes, for those out there that don’t know it, Sweden and Russia are old adversaries and had fought many wars long before the US even was a country. Won some, lost some, over time pretty much a tie.
Anyway, I can see many advantages with this for Russia. They need to modernize their defenses, and who would be stupid enough to attack a nuclear country anyway? And both conscription and scorched earth tactics have to a large extent become obsolete.
So this is good for Russia, but I would also argue it is a good thing overall. Let me explain.
NATO have also played out its part, a reasonable thing would be to scrap that thing as well, but as long as American president insists in expanding the western war-machine I think it is good that someone is “in the way”, or dare to oppose it in some form. And you cannot blame Russia for feeling a bit threatened by the constant ever closing in NATO thingies. Especially since the only warring fraction in the world at the moment is mentioned defense pact.
For Sweden this should mean that we increase military spending slightly to be a step ahead of Russia and to keep ourselves far away from the American led coalition of warmongers. This will never happen of course, our politicians rather thrown our money at useless projects and give money to causes like the rehabilitation of murderers. And let’s not forget politician’s salaries and the hundreds of billions we give to banks. Much more important than to defend the country.
The only slightly worrisome part of this "The New Russian Defense Doctrine” is that Medvedev have spoken about pre-emptive war as an integral part of the new doctrine. From the US example we know what this could mean…
The new doctrine is prompted, at least in part, by three fears; none of which involves a hypothetical war with Nato. No one in Moscow believes such a war is even remotely probable (even though several Swedish papers are writing about it…).
Under the new doctrine, Russia's armed forces, now numbering almost two million, will be cut by almost half. Instead, there will be a massive increase in modern equipment.
As a Swede and consequently a part of the country that historically speaking been warring with Russia more than anyone else, you might assume I would regard this is a threat or ’changed’ form of threat, but then you would be wrong.
And yes, for those out there that don’t know it, Sweden and Russia are old adversaries and had fought many wars long before the US even was a country. Won some, lost some, over time pretty much a tie.
Anyway, I can see many advantages with this for Russia. They need to modernize their defenses, and who would be stupid enough to attack a nuclear country anyway? And both conscription and scorched earth tactics have to a large extent become obsolete.
So this is good for Russia, but I would also argue it is a good thing overall. Let me explain.
NATO have also played out its part, a reasonable thing would be to scrap that thing as well, but as long as American president insists in expanding the western war-machine I think it is good that someone is “in the way”, or dare to oppose it in some form. And you cannot blame Russia for feeling a bit threatened by the constant ever closing in NATO thingies. Especially since the only warring fraction in the world at the moment is mentioned defense pact.
For Sweden this should mean that we increase military spending slightly to be a step ahead of Russia and to keep ourselves far away from the American led coalition of warmongers. This will never happen of course, our politicians rather thrown our money at useless projects and give money to causes like the rehabilitation of murderers. And let’s not forget politician’s salaries and the hundreds of billions we give to banks. Much more important than to defend the country.
The only slightly worrisome part of this "The New Russian Defense Doctrine” is that Medvedev have spoken about pre-emptive war as an integral part of the new doctrine. From the US example we know what this could mean…
How the Enemy class explains fraud
Oh my, you need to watch this. Watch the whole thing; I rarely laugh this much, better than any comedy show. Fantastic!
Remember this is one of many tricksters. These guys should be very happy to be living in modern day UK… Not that it will soon, very soon, matter.
I see a beautiful sunset in the future. The sun going down while shimmering light over a lonely oak-tree with a rope dangling…
James Devine, a British Labour politician, who has been the Member of Parliament for Livingston since 2005.
Remember this is one of many tricksters. These guys should be very happy to be living in modern day UK… Not that it will soon, very soon, matter.
I see a beautiful sunset in the future. The sun going down while shimmering light over a lonely oak-tree with a rope dangling…
James Devine, a British Labour politician, who has been the Member of Parliament for Livingston since 2005.
Another example of idiotic journalism
Apparently 38 women were raped onboard ferries last year. The ferries mainly go between Sweden, Finland and Estonia.
A rape is a despicable act and only a single one is too many.
However, apparently media is screaming about this calling the boats for ‘floating party palaces’ filled with horrible acts that makes Sodom and Gomorra look peaceful and Presbyterian. Of course, as usual, they exaggerate things and scare people unnecessary.
Every boat is filled with somewhere around 1000-1500 people for each trip and since we have many boats going every day back and forth, we’re talking about 10 000 people each day. Many of these individuals drink and look to fornicate, that’s two of the main purposes of going.
So if thousands of people travel every day on boats, drinking themselves silly while looking for someone to fuck, then we can regard it as any medial sized town a Friday night. One rape every 10th Friday doesn’t seem too much, rather under ‘the norm’. Hence you could, with the statistics, argue that these party-boats are pretty safe. If parents are worried for their children, a ‘party-boat’ is safer than going downtown during the weekend.
This isn’t what journalists try to convince us of, but as usual a mainstream paper isn’t good for anything else then toilet visits or making Molotov-cocktail fuses with. The later may be a proper way of acknowledge this fact during a visit to any location of mentioned media…
A rape is a despicable act and only a single one is too many.
However, apparently media is screaming about this calling the boats for ‘floating party palaces’ filled with horrible acts that makes Sodom and Gomorra look peaceful and Presbyterian. Of course, as usual, they exaggerate things and scare people unnecessary.
Every boat is filled with somewhere around 1000-1500 people for each trip and since we have many boats going every day back and forth, we’re talking about 10 000 people each day. Many of these individuals drink and look to fornicate, that’s two of the main purposes of going.
So if thousands of people travel every day on boats, drinking themselves silly while looking for someone to fuck, then we can regard it as any medial sized town a Friday night. One rape every 10th Friday doesn’t seem too much, rather under ‘the norm’. Hence you could, with the statistics, argue that these party-boats are pretty safe. If parents are worried for their children, a ‘party-boat’ is safer than going downtown during the weekend.
This isn’t what journalists try to convince us of, but as usual a mainstream paper isn’t good for anything else then toilet visits or making Molotov-cocktail fuses with. The later may be a proper way of acknowledge this fact during a visit to any location of mentioned media…
Other examples of how Sweden loves its murderers
A 17 year old kicked, raped and murdered a 16 year old girl. Why? Well, apparently she said something…
So the Swedish court decided to punish this guy with 3 years of closed youth care.
How about that? This isn’t jail and the 3 years aren’t really actually 3 years, most of them get out much sooner. And since the normal thing within this system seem to be to send juveniles abroad to learn to hug each other, have a couple of sessions with a psychiatrist and play Nintendo, you cannot really call this a punishment.
In a ‘related’ case two teens, a 16 year old boy and a 16 year old girl, have been found guilty of having killed a 15 year old girl. The boy was found guilty of murder and the girl of instigation of murder. The court confirmed that the two teenagers should serve 20 months in institutional juvenile care.
This is scary shit. Well, not the murders although gruesome in their own right, no I’m talking about the so called sentences. The first case should render the death penalty, maybe also the second, but at least one could demand real punishments like reoccurring Waterboarding or being staked to a peg and having their skin on the back torn off in addition to having an executioner hammering a stake through the criminal’s lubricated anuses.
I do believe in giving people another chance, I do not, however, believe in cuddling murderers. This wasn’t someone hitting another in a bar or a temporarily insanity thingy, these are premeditated planned ghastly murders whereas the criminals known exactly what they were doing.
As long as real crimes aren’t punished, how the hell do we expect people to restrain from committing murders and such?
So the Swedish court decided to punish this guy with 3 years of closed youth care.
How about that? This isn’t jail and the 3 years aren’t really actually 3 years, most of them get out much sooner. And since the normal thing within this system seem to be to send juveniles abroad to learn to hug each other, have a couple of sessions with a psychiatrist and play Nintendo, you cannot really call this a punishment.
In a ‘related’ case two teens, a 16 year old boy and a 16 year old girl, have been found guilty of having killed a 15 year old girl. The boy was found guilty of murder and the girl of instigation of murder. The court confirmed that the two teenagers should serve 20 months in institutional juvenile care.
This is scary shit. Well, not the murders although gruesome in their own right, no I’m talking about the so called sentences. The first case should render the death penalty, maybe also the second, but at least one could demand real punishments like reoccurring Waterboarding or being staked to a peg and having their skin on the back torn off in addition to having an executioner hammering a stake through the criminal’s lubricated anuses.
I do believe in giving people another chance, I do not, however, believe in cuddling murderers. This wasn’t someone hitting another in a bar or a temporarily insanity thingy, these are premeditated planned ghastly murders whereas the criminals known exactly what they were doing.
As long as real crimes aren’t punished, how the hell do we expect people to restrain from committing murders and such?
Friday revelations
As usual the powers that be wait to the end of the week (or for a longer holiday) to reveal bad news. Today, among other things, we are waiting for US unemployment numbers for January. And watch out for that one, they never give us the full account.
You know why they do this don’t you? Well if you don’t, just think for a moment about what’s normally not open during weekends…
Anyway, I’ve seen many news articles lately how we are closing in on a double-dip recession, how countries are facing harsh decisions and so forth. This is nonsense of course. They’ve been lying to us from the start and journalists, useless as always, never question a single thing.
The truth is that the recession never ended, in fact it has worsened. They can show how many GDP numbers they wish, the underlying foundation and the math tells the real story.
About ten years ago I wrote several letters to newspapers and argued within several political bodies that we were facing tough times. I also said back then that people should start buying gold, if anyone listened back then you would have quadrupled (or more) your investment by now. About 6 years ago I started to really look at the numbers and started to say that housing and stock markets were in big trouble in addition to saying that a deep recession was closing in. I also argued that after the first Q of 2010 the world would plummet down in darkness if we didn’t do anything about it.
Since then I’ve revised my prediction slightly because not even I thought that politicians would be as foolish as they’ve been. They did “save us” in the sense that all the stimulus, borrowing, printing and government interventions postponed the depression, but in doing so the situation have deteriorated into utter madness. The condition we find ourselves in now is worse than anything ever seen before.
We are facing a financial and political Armageddon, and that’s not an exaggeration.
Never before have so few done so much to destroy everything for so many.
We could still save most of our civilizations, if we did the right thing now. That is to say we cut government with 70-80% (or more), removed all obstacles including fascist internet regulations, and if we went back to sound money and crushed all forms of central banking. Sure it would still be bad - a couple of years of depression with lots of problems, but then it would be over and prosperity would flourish. The road we are on now however makes any talk about recovery idiotic at best.
The math doesn’t tell lies.
During about ten years now we’ve heard how manmade global warming will kill us all, it has all been revealed as a fraud over and over again. Only the really deeply religious tree-hugging fanatics, bought for ‘scientists’ and politicians still argue this case. How long can they keep the scam of financial recovery and Keynesianism going? Well, certainly not ten years, if they can manage ten more months I will be surprised.
Watch out for those scapegoats; Muslims, greed and capitalism. These are the things they already are blaming and it will only increase as the economies default more and more. Don’t buy that crap.
Journalists are highly to blame for not doing their job, cornflake economists should be blamed for not understanding 4th grade math, central banks should be blamed for causing the boom-and-bust cycles, and big business should be blamed for sleeping with all the rest of the enemy class. But the group you really should blame is politicians. They sit on the power, they made it all happen, and they have been lying to you. Sure a certain level of guilt is with you and how you vote, you are stupid, but when you get that rope and find that lamp-post, please string up those that do belong there.
Interesting times indeed…
You know why they do this don’t you? Well if you don’t, just think for a moment about what’s normally not open during weekends…
Anyway, I’ve seen many news articles lately how we are closing in on a double-dip recession, how countries are facing harsh decisions and so forth. This is nonsense of course. They’ve been lying to us from the start and journalists, useless as always, never question a single thing.
The truth is that the recession never ended, in fact it has worsened. They can show how many GDP numbers they wish, the underlying foundation and the math tells the real story.
About ten years ago I wrote several letters to newspapers and argued within several political bodies that we were facing tough times. I also said back then that people should start buying gold, if anyone listened back then you would have quadrupled (or more) your investment by now. About 6 years ago I started to really look at the numbers and started to say that housing and stock markets were in big trouble in addition to saying that a deep recession was closing in. I also argued that after the first Q of 2010 the world would plummet down in darkness if we didn’t do anything about it.
Since then I’ve revised my prediction slightly because not even I thought that politicians would be as foolish as they’ve been. They did “save us” in the sense that all the stimulus, borrowing, printing and government interventions postponed the depression, but in doing so the situation have deteriorated into utter madness. The condition we find ourselves in now is worse than anything ever seen before.
We are facing a financial and political Armageddon, and that’s not an exaggeration.
Never before have so few done so much to destroy everything for so many.
We could still save most of our civilizations, if we did the right thing now. That is to say we cut government with 70-80% (or more), removed all obstacles including fascist internet regulations, and if we went back to sound money and crushed all forms of central banking. Sure it would still be bad - a couple of years of depression with lots of problems, but then it would be over and prosperity would flourish. The road we are on now however makes any talk about recovery idiotic at best.
The math doesn’t tell lies.
During about ten years now we’ve heard how manmade global warming will kill us all, it has all been revealed as a fraud over and over again. Only the really deeply religious tree-hugging fanatics, bought for ‘scientists’ and politicians still argue this case. How long can they keep the scam of financial recovery and Keynesianism going? Well, certainly not ten years, if they can manage ten more months I will be surprised.
Watch out for those scapegoats; Muslims, greed and capitalism. These are the things they already are blaming and it will only increase as the economies default more and more. Don’t buy that crap.
Journalists are highly to blame for not doing their job, cornflake economists should be blamed for not understanding 4th grade math, central banks should be blamed for causing the boom-and-bust cycles, and big business should be blamed for sleeping with all the rest of the enemy class. But the group you really should blame is politicians. They sit on the power, they made it all happen, and they have been lying to you. Sure a certain level of guilt is with you and how you vote, you are stupid, but when you get that rope and find that lamp-post, please string up those that do belong there.
Interesting times indeed…
Thursday, February 4, 2010
Is it time yet?
I was sitting and writing something about the timing of the coming collapse when I noticed an article in Bloomberg that covers the same topic in a good way.
For those of you that don’t talk ‘economic’ this isn’t a positive outlook and since they don’t mention several of the worse declining numbers I’ve been focusing on, you can probably imagine how bad things are right now.
Media don’t tell you the truth, they are giving you the cliff-notes often of the positive variety, so I’m kind of happy every time I find something close to reality.
Check it out here: Bloomberg
A taste:
The MSCI World Index of 23 developed markets sank 2.4 percent, the most since Oct. 1, while the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index fell 2.4 percent at 2:31 p.m. in New York and benchmark equity indexes for Brazil, Portugal and Spain plummeted the most in at least 11 months. Oil lost 5 percent, the biggest drop in six months, and gold tumbled the most since 2008 as a stronger dollar curbed demand for commodities as alternative investments. The euro sank 1 percent to $1.3759, the lowest since May 21.
For those of you that don’t talk ‘economic’ this isn’t a positive outlook and since they don’t mention several of the worse declining numbers I’ve been focusing on, you can probably imagine how bad things are right now.
Media don’t tell you the truth, they are giving you the cliff-notes often of the positive variety, so I’m kind of happy every time I find something close to reality.
Check it out here: Bloomberg
A taste:
The MSCI World Index of 23 developed markets sank 2.4 percent, the most since Oct. 1, while the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index fell 2.4 percent at 2:31 p.m. in New York and benchmark equity indexes for Brazil, Portugal and Spain plummeted the most in at least 11 months. Oil lost 5 percent, the biggest drop in six months, and gold tumbled the most since 2008 as a stronger dollar curbed demand for commodities as alternative investments. The euro sank 1 percent to $1.3759, the lowest since May 21.
Perfect afternoon reading
Counting Cats in Zanzibar is kind of pissed at Prince Chuckles, the one with the ears; I find that post good afternoon reading...
Read more here Counting Cats in Zanzibar
Afterwards I suggest you read my post about ropes. Find that here: apocalypse nowish
Read more here Counting Cats in Zanzibar
Afterwards I suggest you read my post about ropes. Find that here: apocalypse nowish
Another ‘Green Shoot’ from America
First-time U.S. jobless claims rise just as expected. The US Labor Department has stated that new claims for unemployment insurance rose by 8,000 to a seasonally adjusted 480,000. Wall Street cornflake economists had, of course, wrong as always, expected a drop to 460,000.
This means that the number of unemployed soon can be calculated above 20% also by government measures. Today the figure is 17%. Real unemployment has already reached depression levels, but is hidden away so those who remain working continue to spend money they don’t have so GDP shows better levels.
This means that the number of unemployed soon can be calculated above 20% also by government measures. Today the figure is 17%. Real unemployment has already reached depression levels, but is hidden away so those who remain working continue to spend money they don’t have so GDP shows better levels.
For future reference
Having a good rope around is always a good thing. A rope can be used for hanging laundry, tying up the wife, going rock-climbing or in countless other ways.
Of course the choice of rope depends on the purpose of usage. If one, for instance, wanted to drop something weighing around 180 lbs from between four and ten feet the rope needs to hold for that particular pressure and it should also hold several times over, no need to get many ropes when you can get the job done with just one.
The strength of a rope is measured by the rating of static elongation and maximum impact force. The elongation measures the amount a rope stretches when weighted with a standard load (80 kilograms/176 pounds). Ropes with low static elongation stretch less. Higher static elongation means ropes have more stretch (cushioning the impact of a fall). Maximum impact force refers to the amount of force transmitted to a climber during a fall. Low maximum impact force means the rope absorbs more of the energy generated in a fall. However, such ropes stretch more, increasing your chances of hitting the ground or a ledge if you were to climb or hang from such a rope.
But we do not really think about this for the purpose many soon will need to look at a rope since there should not be any ledge and the feet should certainly never hit ground, but it is good to have some solid background information.
Also, one might consider ignoring doing proper calculations, if the rope does not hold; there will be a funny couple of minutes getting another rope, so to “wing it” have its inherent charm. Maybe we can even get additional mandrake root out of the deal?
Another fun potential consequence of not doing the proper groundwork is the same thing that happened to the historical figure of “Black Jack”, that is to say a so severe spinal cord injury may occur that it leads to total separation.
For our future procedure we also need to decide whether or not to induce a ligature. That may lead to more tenderness between the most upper part and torso with the result of less movement afterwards, but is that really want we want? Such method has been used effectively before, among other places Nuremberg...
But surely a bit more dangling and a tad more of muffled noises are preferable?
If so another choice need to be made, well… such a choice will most likely be made anyway – namely the choice of venue. A tree is classical and have that sense of being close to nature, on the other hand a lamp-post have proven useful before in addition to being in close proximity for most urban inhabitants. Whatever the choice may be make sure to make room for applauding and cheering spectators.
Alas the right choice of goods to drop. This may vary from a heavy-set elected pen pusher to the thinnest monocle wearing money-exchanger, but they do come in all shapes and disguises, so make sure that the falling lump is rightly accused.
Come to afterwards we need to consider the sphincter relaxing and spontaneously evacuated urine and faeces. Although fun as supplementary proper consequence, it may lead to some stench, which, coincidentally, the entire baggage will produce sooner or later anyway.
So even though the dangling end-product can induce certain levels of righteous thinking, we need to find proper burial grounds. Not for religious reasons, but rather for sanitary ones. Also please remember to mark the spot for future travelers. One can always find a reason to urinate and do a little jig on such a place.
Of course the choice of rope depends on the purpose of usage. If one, for instance, wanted to drop something weighing around 180 lbs from between four and ten feet the rope needs to hold for that particular pressure and it should also hold several times over, no need to get many ropes when you can get the job done with just one.
The strength of a rope is measured by the rating of static elongation and maximum impact force. The elongation measures the amount a rope stretches when weighted with a standard load (80 kilograms/176 pounds). Ropes with low static elongation stretch less. Higher static elongation means ropes have more stretch (cushioning the impact of a fall). Maximum impact force refers to the amount of force transmitted to a climber during a fall. Low maximum impact force means the rope absorbs more of the energy generated in a fall. However, such ropes stretch more, increasing your chances of hitting the ground or a ledge if you were to climb or hang from such a rope.
But we do not really think about this for the purpose many soon will need to look at a rope since there should not be any ledge and the feet should certainly never hit ground, but it is good to have some solid background information.
Also, one might consider ignoring doing proper calculations, if the rope does not hold; there will be a funny couple of minutes getting another rope, so to “wing it” have its inherent charm. Maybe we can even get additional mandrake root out of the deal?
Another fun potential consequence of not doing the proper groundwork is the same thing that happened to the historical figure of “Black Jack”, that is to say a so severe spinal cord injury may occur that it leads to total separation.
For our future procedure we also need to decide whether or not to induce a ligature. That may lead to more tenderness between the most upper part and torso with the result of less movement afterwards, but is that really want we want? Such method has been used effectively before, among other places Nuremberg...
But surely a bit more dangling and a tad more of muffled noises are preferable?
If so another choice need to be made, well… such a choice will most likely be made anyway – namely the choice of venue. A tree is classical and have that sense of being close to nature, on the other hand a lamp-post have proven useful before in addition to being in close proximity for most urban inhabitants. Whatever the choice may be make sure to make room for applauding and cheering spectators.
Alas the right choice of goods to drop. This may vary from a heavy-set elected pen pusher to the thinnest monocle wearing money-exchanger, but they do come in all shapes and disguises, so make sure that the falling lump is rightly accused.
Come to afterwards we need to consider the sphincter relaxing and spontaneously evacuated urine and faeces. Although fun as supplementary proper consequence, it may lead to some stench, which, coincidentally, the entire baggage will produce sooner or later anyway.
So even though the dangling end-product can induce certain levels of righteous thinking, we need to find proper burial grounds. Not for religious reasons, but rather for sanitary ones. Also please remember to mark the spot for future travelers. One can always find a reason to urinate and do a little jig on such a place.
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Gestapo strikes again
During several strikes based upon claims from a private SS force working for big business within the entertainment industry the Swedish police busted down doors all over the country today 2nd February 2010. The fascists say it was to stop file-sharers sharing information with each other.
Women get raped every day; people get murdered, robbed, stabbed and tortured around the clock. We have international crime syndicates selling drugs to minors, criminal gangs are operating all over the country, and shootings are taking place all the time, but somehow the police are busting down doors at innocent and honest citizens houses because they are sharing music and information. A good priority of tax money?
It is time to strike back people. I know that is what they want, they are just waiting for additional reasons to tighten policies even more, but we cannot let them get away with this fascist crap anymore.
I wish I had the computer skill to hack into and destroy all police data, plant viruses within government computers and reek awoke among all authorities. Sadly I don’t, but maybe someone else does..?
Women get raped every day; people get murdered, robbed, stabbed and tortured around the clock. We have international crime syndicates selling drugs to minors, criminal gangs are operating all over the country, and shootings are taking place all the time, but somehow the police are busting down doors at innocent and honest citizens houses because they are sharing music and information. A good priority of tax money?
It is time to strike back people. I know that is what they want, they are just waiting for additional reasons to tighten policies even more, but we cannot let them get away with this fascist crap anymore.
I wish I had the computer skill to hack into and destroy all police data, plant viruses within government computers and reek awoke among all authorities. Sadly I don’t, but maybe someone else does..?
Monday, February 1, 2010
This is marketing
Holding a degree in marketing and having worked within the field for many years, some things get my blood pumping, and this is one of those:
Poor little billionaire Tiger. Getting wealthy by hitting a small ball with sticks at the most beautiful locations of the world and getting married with a Swedish hottie is hard work. You feel sorry for him too, don’t ya?
Anyway when a strip-joint makes the best of it and flies over a golf-tournament with this message, I get hard. This is making the best of a situation. This is marketing.
Pure genius.
If I'm ever in the area, I promise I stop by and give the women at this establishment lots of extras...
Poor little billionaire Tiger. Getting wealthy by hitting a small ball with sticks at the most beautiful locations of the world and getting married with a Swedish hottie is hard work. You feel sorry for him too, don’t ya?
Anyway when a strip-joint makes the best of it and flies over a golf-tournament with this message, I get hard. This is making the best of a situation. This is marketing.
Pure genius.
If I'm ever in the area, I promise I stop by and give the women at this establishment lots of extras...
Sanity, were aret thou?
IPCC, you know the UN panel of climate fraud consistent of bureaucrats and pseudo-scientists (very few among those 2500 actually hold any relevant degree), have been exposed again and again.
My sister that mostly pray to the save-the-planet-and-all-animal-religion have shrugged and regard everything that comes from these tricksters as lies, so why haven’t media and mainstream pundits figured out the same? Every group of ordinary folk that comes my way and make this the topic of conversation spits at the gasoline taxes, pulls up the middle finger at Fraudenhagen talks and seem to be willing to knock off a couple of Polar Bears with a rusty ax, but politicians goes tralalala and impose even more of the same crap.
Now after Climate-gate, Glacier-gate and Hurricane-gate, and the latest Amazonian-gate even the hardiest green Nazi most be feeling some question marks bonging above their heads, but you people out there should have realized this a long time ago.
Many years ago I figured out what the real agenda is, all on my own, only reading and making my own conclusions. No oil-company paid me to search for any form of validity, no big business gave me stuff to follow scary claims to their origin, no heartless rich banker in top-hat hired me to look into what UN and other entities have said.
You know what I found?
– That not a single one of the alarmists ideas or claims holds, not one.
I still haven’t found a single argument that holds, there’s no fact supporting the notion of manmade global warming, there’s no evidence, no science, nothing, nada, zilch.
And no, I’m not a scientist, but even a layman should be able to find some sort of validity, right? I haven’t. And believe me, I’ve tried. Do it yourself, don’t take my word for it, don’t listen to bloggers or whatnot, search and find out for yourself. If you find any proof, just one, my earlier promised of £100 will still be paid out to you.
To my amusement the western world is facing a very harsh winter. Just when they were about to take carbon-trading to the next level, making a few billionaires and some banks very happy, we get hit by the longest and coldest winter seen in many decades. How’s that for irony? Mother Nature doesn’t like liars it seems.
When will mainstream media start doing their job? Are every journalist paid for by big business (that actually loves this scheme, contrary what tree-huggers say) and every newspaper threatened into silence? It almost seem that way, because why else would they almost totally ignore and not investigate what hast to be the biggest scandal of all time?
Why not look into facts about all those animals that are supposed to be going extinct all the time? It is not only the continuous revealed ‘gate’s they scam us with, cuddly carnivores’ beasts must be in the mix for some reason.
WWF is still running ads in Swedish papers claiming there’s only 3500 tigers left in the world, but according to their own website the number is close to 7000 and many reports say Tigers probably can be counted somewhere above 10 000.
And those fucking Polar Bears. Aren’t you also bloody tired of hearing about a creature going extinct because of lack of cold when they apparently survived the Middle Ages much warmer period? And Polar Bears are actually doing great. The worldwide polar bear population is somewhere around 25,000 today a number that has held steady over the last 25 years or actually has risen slightly. And that’s more than double the around 10,000 that were living in the 1960s.
A tad sanity, that’s all that I ask for, is that too much?
About six or seven years ago when I predicted our current economic dilemma, I also drew the conclusion that people either are highly stupid or don’t want to know what’s really going on and that those in charge, the powers that be, took full advantage of this. But even I, with my cynical loathsome approach to much of humanity, didn’t think the sheople of this world were so utterly insane that they believe in something that make the claim “the moon is made out of cheese” seemed rational.
Manmade global warming is a hoax, it’s a giant scam partly perpetrated by the billions thrown at researches to say it is real and partly coming from government wanting a new source of income.
If they can do this to us, and you can believe it, they can do anything. Please remember that the next time you question why the hell the Germans listened to ideas about eugenics. You do it too, today, because the manmade global warming fraud will lead to (and already have led to) the death hundreds of thousands of people. Millions may die if we continue with this idiocy.
This is the ultimate test of sanity and intelligence. Forget Mensa or university degrees, if you really want to know how far above the ameba you are in evolutionary steps, this is it. Believe in this hoax and you’re a one-celled idiot, plain and simple.
My sister that mostly pray to the save-the-planet-and-all-animal-religion have shrugged and regard everything that comes from these tricksters as lies, so why haven’t media and mainstream pundits figured out the same? Every group of ordinary folk that comes my way and make this the topic of conversation spits at the gasoline taxes, pulls up the middle finger at Fraudenhagen talks and seem to be willing to knock off a couple of Polar Bears with a rusty ax, but politicians goes tralalala and impose even more of the same crap.
Now after Climate-gate, Glacier-gate and Hurricane-gate, and the latest Amazonian-gate even the hardiest green Nazi most be feeling some question marks bonging above their heads, but you people out there should have realized this a long time ago.
Many years ago I figured out what the real agenda is, all on my own, only reading and making my own conclusions. No oil-company paid me to search for any form of validity, no big business gave me stuff to follow scary claims to their origin, no heartless rich banker in top-hat hired me to look into what UN and other entities have said.
You know what I found?
– That not a single one of the alarmists ideas or claims holds, not one.
I still haven’t found a single argument that holds, there’s no fact supporting the notion of manmade global warming, there’s no evidence, no science, nothing, nada, zilch.
And no, I’m not a scientist, but even a layman should be able to find some sort of validity, right? I haven’t. And believe me, I’ve tried. Do it yourself, don’t take my word for it, don’t listen to bloggers or whatnot, search and find out for yourself. If you find any proof, just one, my earlier promised of £100 will still be paid out to you.
To my amusement the western world is facing a very harsh winter. Just when they were about to take carbon-trading to the next level, making a few billionaires and some banks very happy, we get hit by the longest and coldest winter seen in many decades. How’s that for irony? Mother Nature doesn’t like liars it seems.
When will mainstream media start doing their job? Are every journalist paid for by big business (that actually loves this scheme, contrary what tree-huggers say) and every newspaper threatened into silence? It almost seem that way, because why else would they almost totally ignore and not investigate what hast to be the biggest scandal of all time?
Why not look into facts about all those animals that are supposed to be going extinct all the time? It is not only the continuous revealed ‘gate’s they scam us with, cuddly carnivores’ beasts must be in the mix for some reason.
WWF is still running ads in Swedish papers claiming there’s only 3500 tigers left in the world, but according to their own website the number is close to 7000 and many reports say Tigers probably can be counted somewhere above 10 000.
And those fucking Polar Bears. Aren’t you also bloody tired of hearing about a creature going extinct because of lack of cold when they apparently survived the Middle Ages much warmer period? And Polar Bears are actually doing great. The worldwide polar bear population is somewhere around 25,000 today a number that has held steady over the last 25 years or actually has risen slightly. And that’s more than double the around 10,000 that were living in the 1960s.
A tad sanity, that’s all that I ask for, is that too much?
About six or seven years ago when I predicted our current economic dilemma, I also drew the conclusion that people either are highly stupid or don’t want to know what’s really going on and that those in charge, the powers that be, took full advantage of this. But even I, with my cynical loathsome approach to much of humanity, didn’t think the sheople of this world were so utterly insane that they believe in something that make the claim “the moon is made out of cheese” seemed rational.
Manmade global warming is a hoax, it’s a giant scam partly perpetrated by the billions thrown at researches to say it is real and partly coming from government wanting a new source of income.
If they can do this to us, and you can believe it, they can do anything. Please remember that the next time you question why the hell the Germans listened to ideas about eugenics. You do it too, today, because the manmade global warming fraud will lead to (and already have led to) the death hundreds of thousands of people. Millions may die if we continue with this idiocy.
This is the ultimate test of sanity and intelligence. Forget Mensa or university degrees, if you really want to know how far above the ameba you are in evolutionary steps, this is it. Believe in this hoax and you’re a one-celled idiot, plain and simple.
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Iranians got tha 'bomb'?
I don’t think this is true; it is probably only one of many thingies as a prelude to the American/Israeli attack on Iran - building up the sense of; “attack is a must” among the general sheople.
But I do however hope it is true because this can be fun on so many levels…
But I do however hope it is true because this can be fun on so many levels…
Mexican Government kills youths and police officers
Thanks to Mexican laws and the government’s expanding war on drugs and drug-cartels, three more incidents have occurred.
In Ciudad Juarez a group of armed men stormed a party in this violent northern border city, killing 13 teens and young adults and injuring about two dozen.
Violence also rocked the oceanside Mexican community of Lazaro Cardenas this weekend. Police in the southwestern city say that just after midnight Saturday, about 20 heavily armed gunmen riding in trucks with tinted windows attacked a police station with grenades and assault rifles, killing a police officer and two civilians.
Also this weekend, three women and two men, all identified as Mexican citizens, were murdered while driving in their van with California license plates near the western Mexican city of Navolato. The bodies of the five victims, including a 16-year-old girl, were found riddled with bullets.
So there you have it, death by government, adding to the body-count of several thousands in Mexico alone.
If they instead legalized drugs and legalized citizens free choice drug-cartels and mafia organizations would disappear almost overnight and people could instead buy drugs at any supermarket, scrutinized by the market and at lower prices. Much of the corruption would go away, and billions would be saved in less policing, less imprisonments and lower hospital costs to victims and their families.
But you see it is important for the government to induce fear in people and have someone to fight. Without a government created enemy, what would we need government for? Also it is good for government to have armed thugs fighting other armed thugs, it gives the people someone to ‘trust’ and also fear since government is the only one allowed to own and carry guns.
In Ciudad Juarez a group of armed men stormed a party in this violent northern border city, killing 13 teens and young adults and injuring about two dozen.
Violence also rocked the oceanside Mexican community of Lazaro Cardenas this weekend. Police in the southwestern city say that just after midnight Saturday, about 20 heavily armed gunmen riding in trucks with tinted windows attacked a police station with grenades and assault rifles, killing a police officer and two civilians.
Also this weekend, three women and two men, all identified as Mexican citizens, were murdered while driving in their van with California license plates near the western Mexican city of Navolato. The bodies of the five victims, including a 16-year-old girl, were found riddled with bullets.
So there you have it, death by government, adding to the body-count of several thousands in Mexico alone.
If they instead legalized drugs and legalized citizens free choice drug-cartels and mafia organizations would disappear almost overnight and people could instead buy drugs at any supermarket, scrutinized by the market and at lower prices. Much of the corruption would go away, and billions would be saved in less policing, less imprisonments and lower hospital costs to victims and their families.
But you see it is important for the government to induce fear in people and have someone to fight. Without a government created enemy, what would we need government for? Also it is good for government to have armed thugs fighting other armed thugs, it gives the people someone to ‘trust’ and also fear since government is the only one allowed to own and carry guns.
Tits, boobs and breasts
It is not easy being a female. Britain seemingly is going after females with large operated boobs because Alky Aida may have infiltrated such attributes with bombs or chemicals, and in Australia the Australian Classification Board (ACB) is now banning depictions of small-breasted A-cup breasted women in adult publications and films. Apparently smallish titties automatically conjure up pedophiles.
Presumably small breasted women taking photographs of themselves will now be guilty of creating simulated child pornography at the same time as women with big breasts are potential terrorists. Where are the feminists? This is the sort of thing I would like to see advocates of female liberty to pop up, but they are probably busy with their penis-envy and chasing some poor blond down the street…
One can also assume that Australia and Britain being so closely linked to each other through the commonwealth will have some sort of cooperation surrounding this? If so and if they take the next possible and very feasible step one cannot help to wonder which sort of females that will be allowed to travel from one country to the other…
And what about a woman that have recorded a sex tape with small breasts and then done a boob-job afterwards? Is she an instigator of pedophilia and a terrorist?
Is this how far we have come with evolution of our species?
--- A pedophile creator? -------------------------- A terrorist? ---
Presumably small breasted women taking photographs of themselves will now be guilty of creating simulated child pornography at the same time as women with big breasts are potential terrorists. Where are the feminists? This is the sort of thing I would like to see advocates of female liberty to pop up, but they are probably busy with their penis-envy and chasing some poor blond down the street…
One can also assume that Australia and Britain being so closely linked to each other through the commonwealth will have some sort of cooperation surrounding this? If so and if they take the next possible and very feasible step one cannot help to wonder which sort of females that will be allowed to travel from one country to the other…
And what about a woman that have recorded a sex tape with small breasts and then done a boob-job afterwards? Is she an instigator of pedophilia and a terrorist?
Is this how far we have come with evolution of our species?
--- A pedophile creator? -------------------------- A terrorist? ---
I love the beard…
Budget ax falls on New York
http://money.cnn.com/2010/01/19/news/economy/New_York_budget_deficit/index.htm
25 State Unemployment Funds Bankrupt; Credit Card Defaults at Record Levels;
Look on the Bright Side
http://www.howestreet.com/articles/index.php?article_id=12230
Two Dozen States Unemployment Funds in the Red, Nine More Within Six Months
http://www.propublica.org/feature/unemployment-funds-in-the-red-propublica-predicts-nine-more-within-0119
More and more states on budget brink
http://money.cnn.com/2010/01/14/news/economy/states.woes.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2010011713
Massachusetts schools brace for deep cuts
http://www.boston.com/yourtown/budgetblues/2010/01/massachusetts_schools_brace_fo.html
Eugenics
Visited Englands Freedome, Souldiers Rights and read about how social workers stole a baby since the mother was deemed too unintelligent by authorities.
For me this is eugenics all over again and this isn’t the first time I’ve heard of a story such as this, but it really got my blood boiling.
The duty of the social services, if there’s supposed to be such a thing, should be to offer whatever assistance may be needed to help them on the road to family life, instead of passing judgment on them on very shaky grounds. And stealing the baby directly from the mother’s arms? Fuck!
This is one of those limit things. The last drop that overfills the glass. I can tell you all right now that if any government thug ever did anything like this to me or mine I would go on the mother of all shooting-sprees. I would go after the record.
And I cannot believe how hospital staff and others around just stand by when this was going on. What the fuck!? I would rather die than let any bureaucrat snatch a baby from its mother’s warm embrace. Couldn’t any doctor, nurse or other patient picked up a scalpel and made these two social workers into immediate 5 liter blood donors? What the hell is wrong with people today?
This is heartless totalitarian master-race crap and believe me, it’s coming to you and your family in one form or the other very soon.
For me this is eugenics all over again and this isn’t the first time I’ve heard of a story such as this, but it really got my blood boiling.
The duty of the social services, if there’s supposed to be such a thing, should be to offer whatever assistance may be needed to help them on the road to family life, instead of passing judgment on them on very shaky grounds. And stealing the baby directly from the mother’s arms? Fuck!
This is one of those limit things. The last drop that overfills the glass. I can tell you all right now that if any government thug ever did anything like this to me or mine I would go on the mother of all shooting-sprees. I would go after the record.
And I cannot believe how hospital staff and others around just stand by when this was going on. What the fuck!? I would rather die than let any bureaucrat snatch a baby from its mother’s warm embrace. Couldn’t any doctor, nurse or other patient picked up a scalpel and made these two social workers into immediate 5 liter blood donors? What the hell is wrong with people today?
This is heartless totalitarian master-race crap and believe me, it’s coming to you and your family in one form or the other very soon.
Got a boob-job? No travel for you…
Apparently Alky Aida has already figured out how to avoid body scanners. According to British newspapers they are planning a new stage in its terror campaign by inserting ‘surgical bombs’ inside people and it seems that the body scanners cannot detect them.
A leading source added that male bombers would have the explosive secreted near their appendix or in their buttocks, while females would have the material placed inside their breasts in the same way as figure-enhancing implants.
Oh, so any silicon breasted female and male with to hard buttocks is a potential terrorist? And apparently anyone carrying a syringe should also be regarded as a suspect since these cleverly fiends use chemicals.
Too big boobs. Check.
Too well-shaped butts. Check.
Diabetes people. Check.
How are they going to tackle this one? How about grounding anyone except large ass, flat-chested healthy losers?
You see the terrorist will always find a way, it’s impossible to have 100% protection and there are literarily thousands of ways to bomb, crash or disrupt an airplane. Hell, I know from experience they let you onboard with small knifes and flammable fluids while tossing away your hairgel. And anyone knows that you can MacGyver together a nuclear device from a shoe-string and toothpaste, so why not ground everyone? Do we really need airplanes? Let’s stop all travel, communication and trade, what’s the diff? Right?
This is getting more ridiculous by the minute…
A terrorist?
A leading source added that male bombers would have the explosive secreted near their appendix or in their buttocks, while females would have the material placed inside their breasts in the same way as figure-enhancing implants.
Oh, so any silicon breasted female and male with to hard buttocks is a potential terrorist? And apparently anyone carrying a syringe should also be regarded as a suspect since these cleverly fiends use chemicals.
Too big boobs. Check.
Too well-shaped butts. Check.
Diabetes people. Check.
How are they going to tackle this one? How about grounding anyone except large ass, flat-chested healthy losers?
You see the terrorist will always find a way, it’s impossible to have 100% protection and there are literarily thousands of ways to bomb, crash or disrupt an airplane. Hell, I know from experience they let you onboard with small knifes and flammable fluids while tossing away your hairgel. And anyone knows that you can MacGyver together a nuclear device from a shoe-string and toothpaste, so why not ground everyone? Do we really need airplanes? Let’s stop all travel, communication and trade, what’s the diff? Right?
This is getting more ridiculous by the minute…
A terrorist?
The lying continues
Several funnies have emerged on the scene the latest couple of days, one more deceitful then the other. And as usual mainstream media refuse to do any sort of investigating work or question anything from the powers that be.
The U.S. economy grew in the fourth quarter of 2009, with 5.7%, at the fastest pace in six years, or so they say. Most within media only report this as another sign of better times ahead, but is it really?
Even mainstream economists and business owners in the US remains unconvinced that a full-scale recovery is underway or that substantial job growth would soon follow. A couple of papers have reported on this with quotations from economists believe that most of the fourth-quarter growth was driven by temporary factors like cyclical inventory changes and government stimulus that are likely to fade in the middle of this year.
For the elitists agenda the key question for the U.S. economy, seen to GDP, is the consumer and government. Consumer spending, which alone accounts for about 70% of U.S. economic activity, is the main target to keep fictive GDP-numbers up and sustain what cornflake economists call a solid recovery. Government on the other hand can also contribute through lots of spending, no matter on what which is seen on US military numbers, the only factor to consider is spending so GDP is going up.
But how do you keep consumer spending up when the American people are in-debt like never before, official unemployment is 10% (in reality close to 20%) and the number of producing hours is going down? Well, you can’t, not in the long run. However, excluding autos, consumer spending increased at a 3 percent rate last quarter, the most in three years, indicating the biggest part of the economy was gaining speed. But why? When things look so dire, people really don’t have money, how come they are still spending?
Well, that magic has several ingredients.
Firstly zero interest rates which make it very cheap to borrow and spend.
Secondly an increase in the money supply which make certain parts of the economy to throw notes around.
And thirdly; it all depends on how you count. You see the third-quarter GDP was revised from 3.5 percent (huge “green shoot” in its day) initially to 2.8 percent but it eventually landed at 2.2 percent. Can you say ‘scam’? There’s no reason to think that this will not be done for the fourth quarter.
And looking at the real numbers this potential revised level seems very feasible since the domestic purchases deflator rose 2.1% while the GDP deflator rose 0.6%, meaning that terms of trade adjusted GDP rose 4.2%, not 5.7%. And the very optimistic trade-deficit number also seems to be almost deliberately increased.
But it doesn’t stop there either. As much as 3.4% was because of reduced inventory reductions. Which means that it is a temporarily gain short-term, but may very well impact negatively long-term.
Can’t I see anything bright about this? Of course I can, and if everything else was okay I would even agree with our mainstream soul-killers that things are looking better, but as one of those people using my brain I cannot help considering in factors like a defaulting commercial real-estate and the trillions of borrowing and even more trillions of printing. Well, there are a lot of things about the US economy that points towards total break-down and a huge depression so some GDP numbers that most likely is both exaggerated and comes from temporarily gains shouldn’t rock any yacht.
In addition GDP doesn’t tell us what the real wealth creation level is, GDP only tells us about activity within the economy, any kind of activity. If they, oh let’s say shuffle sand out on sandy beaches, re-build bridges that don’t need re-building, throw lots of cash at the useless manmade global warming scam, spends lots and lots of money on the military and similar ineffectual and expensive hoaxes, well then GDP goes up.
Yet another lie to get you to get another loan and spend your last savings.
The U.S. economy grew in the fourth quarter of 2009, with 5.7%, at the fastest pace in six years, or so they say. Most within media only report this as another sign of better times ahead, but is it really?
Even mainstream economists and business owners in the US remains unconvinced that a full-scale recovery is underway or that substantial job growth would soon follow. A couple of papers have reported on this with quotations from economists believe that most of the fourth-quarter growth was driven by temporary factors like cyclical inventory changes and government stimulus that are likely to fade in the middle of this year.
For the elitists agenda the key question for the U.S. economy, seen to GDP, is the consumer and government. Consumer spending, which alone accounts for about 70% of U.S. economic activity, is the main target to keep fictive GDP-numbers up and sustain what cornflake economists call a solid recovery. Government on the other hand can also contribute through lots of spending, no matter on what which is seen on US military numbers, the only factor to consider is spending so GDP is going up.
But how do you keep consumer spending up when the American people are in-debt like never before, official unemployment is 10% (in reality close to 20%) and the number of producing hours is going down? Well, you can’t, not in the long run. However, excluding autos, consumer spending increased at a 3 percent rate last quarter, the most in three years, indicating the biggest part of the economy was gaining speed. But why? When things look so dire, people really don’t have money, how come they are still spending?
Well, that magic has several ingredients.
Firstly zero interest rates which make it very cheap to borrow and spend.
Secondly an increase in the money supply which make certain parts of the economy to throw notes around.
And thirdly; it all depends on how you count. You see the third-quarter GDP was revised from 3.5 percent (huge “green shoot” in its day) initially to 2.8 percent but it eventually landed at 2.2 percent. Can you say ‘scam’? There’s no reason to think that this will not be done for the fourth quarter.
And looking at the real numbers this potential revised level seems very feasible since the domestic purchases deflator rose 2.1% while the GDP deflator rose 0.6%, meaning that terms of trade adjusted GDP rose 4.2%, not 5.7%. And the very optimistic trade-deficit number also seems to be almost deliberately increased.
But it doesn’t stop there either. As much as 3.4% was because of reduced inventory reductions. Which means that it is a temporarily gain short-term, but may very well impact negatively long-term.
Can’t I see anything bright about this? Of course I can, and if everything else was okay I would even agree with our mainstream soul-killers that things are looking better, but as one of those people using my brain I cannot help considering in factors like a defaulting commercial real-estate and the trillions of borrowing and even more trillions of printing. Well, there are a lot of things about the US economy that points towards total break-down and a huge depression so some GDP numbers that most likely is both exaggerated and comes from temporarily gains shouldn’t rock any yacht.
In addition GDP doesn’t tell us what the real wealth creation level is, GDP only tells us about activity within the economy, any kind of activity. If they, oh let’s say shuffle sand out on sandy beaches, re-build bridges that don’t need re-building, throw lots of cash at the useless manmade global warming scam, spends lots and lots of money on the military and similar ineffectual and expensive hoaxes, well then GDP goes up.
Yet another lie to get you to get another loan and spend your last savings.
And so we enter the second act
A former police chief is suspected of rape in an expanding sex ring investigation in Sweden and a number of other well-known men are also said to be under investigation.
Göran Lindberg is the name of the man and he’s a former respected law enforcement official, among other things know for his commitment to feminist ideas.
Apparently Lindberg’s name came up unexpectedly in connection with the investigation of a suspicious death in the suburbs of Stockholm.
In July of 2009 a 60-year-old man mysteriously fell to his death from a balcony and police launched a preliminary investigation into the suspected murder. During the investigation, police confiscated a computer and a mobile phone which belonged to the deceased 60-year-old.
When investigators examined the contents of the machines and found the names of several men, they realized they had stumbled upon a new sex ring (including several rape of minors) and handed the matter over to the Stockholm County police force. However, it wasn’t Lindberg’s name that first caused a stir among the investigators, but the names of several other men. Makes you wonder who else is on that list eh? Of course the police have since then refuted any claim of other names…
Anyway, can you see one of the central themes of this movie-like development?
Okay let me continue the story.
You see the kiddy rapist had, together with his friends, this little sex-ring mainly online, of course. They used computers, internet and such to find each other and some (all?) of their victims.
Still not in-tuned? Well how about this neat little statement from our friend Göran:
“It is so easy to connect nowadays, everything is so excisable.” – meaning internet…
But this diminutive story doesn’t really stop there, because when looking around newspapers the latest days when above have played out, I think I never read so many anti-free-internet stories as during these days.
Only today you can read about how some email con-artist have stolen peoples identities, how the Swedish Film institute wants to combat web-piracy, how John Edwards sex-flick is floating around internet, and how easy any hacker can take control over your computer. And these are just a small portion of all the stuff you can find.
This sort of comes out as a conspiracy, it’s not. The elitists will however not waste any time; as soon as anything of the sort becomes news they will milk it with the same arguments, hammering them into the consciousness of the general public. And so little by little, step by step, they can implement their fascist ideas while the sheople might even thank ‘em for it, you know, we need to think of the Childreeeeen…
This will continue for a while, people are not yet ready for the next act wherein the PTB will take us into the total totalitarian state comes to information, so they need to sneak it in through the backdoor. And as with any rear-end usage they lube us with continuous caresses and kisses, saying everything will be okay, just think of the kids and how we can save us from terrorists. Bit down on the pillow please, it will soon feel better.
Göran Lindberg is the name of the man and he’s a former respected law enforcement official, among other things know for his commitment to feminist ideas.
Apparently Lindberg’s name came up unexpectedly in connection with the investigation of a suspicious death in the suburbs of Stockholm.
In July of 2009 a 60-year-old man mysteriously fell to his death from a balcony and police launched a preliminary investigation into the suspected murder. During the investigation, police confiscated a computer and a mobile phone which belonged to the deceased 60-year-old.
When investigators examined the contents of the machines and found the names of several men, they realized they had stumbled upon a new sex ring (including several rape of minors) and handed the matter over to the Stockholm County police force. However, it wasn’t Lindberg’s name that first caused a stir among the investigators, but the names of several other men. Makes you wonder who else is on that list eh? Of course the police have since then refuted any claim of other names…
Anyway, can you see one of the central themes of this movie-like development?
Okay let me continue the story.
You see the kiddy rapist had, together with his friends, this little sex-ring mainly online, of course. They used computers, internet and such to find each other and some (all?) of their victims.
Still not in-tuned? Well how about this neat little statement from our friend Göran:
“It is so easy to connect nowadays, everything is so excisable.” – meaning internet…
But this diminutive story doesn’t really stop there, because when looking around newspapers the latest days when above have played out, I think I never read so many anti-free-internet stories as during these days.
Only today you can read about how some email con-artist have stolen peoples identities, how the Swedish Film institute wants to combat web-piracy, how John Edwards sex-flick is floating around internet, and how easy any hacker can take control over your computer. And these are just a small portion of all the stuff you can find.
This sort of comes out as a conspiracy, it’s not. The elitists will however not waste any time; as soon as anything of the sort becomes news they will milk it with the same arguments, hammering them into the consciousness of the general public. And so little by little, step by step, they can implement their fascist ideas while the sheople might even thank ‘em for it, you know, we need to think of the Childreeeeen…
This will continue for a while, people are not yet ready for the next act wherein the PTB will take us into the total totalitarian state comes to information, so they need to sneak it in through the backdoor. And as with any rear-end usage they lube us with continuous caresses and kisses, saying everything will be okay, just think of the kids and how we can save us from terrorists. Bit down on the pillow please, it will soon feel better.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)