Throughout my upbringing during the raving 80’s I had people around telling me how terrible it was to support the US. The capitalist Mecca run by a horrifying conservative actor was the very essence of immorality, corruption and greed, and so obviously I couldn’t wait to move there.
Even back then I just knew that whenever the righteous elite complained over something, whenever Swedish journalists trashed something that lefties also loathed, it just had to be one of the best things ever.
I still feel the same, but not really the same…
You see the thing I love about America isn’t the country, the people, the scenery or the supposed ‘capitalism’. And it is definitely not the reoccurring wars, war crimes and the today looming depression. What I feel in love with and still love is the idea of America, the basic foundation with the bill of rights and the constitution.
Every scrappy looking fella in the world together with outcasts, persecuted religious and political groups, criminals, starving families, the extremely poor, adventurers and ordinary folks all moved to America and they formed what I regard to be the best, the brightest and most fantastic country ever seen on the planet.
Outcompeting and out producing everyone and everything that came before or since and growing exponentially the US was the shining beacon in a world of darkness.
Nothing has frightened and upset statism loving autocrats more than the idea of America. Every king, every emperor, every pharaoh, every totalitarian thug throughout history with delusions of world domination on the backs of the people have turned in their graves from fear.
With minor local experiments aside, US of A was, in the beginning, the closest thing to capitalism and equality we have seen.
Sadly, in today’s United States, hardly anything of that remains. Only remanence. The memory. Soon hardly even that.
Many Americans seem to think they still have capitalism or that they still live in a country were the American dream flourish and that they are still the best and the brightest. To me this is a very strange notion.
US capitalism have encountered many problems and stabs but the first deathblow came 1913 with the Federal Reserve act effectively introducing inflationary policies, mad deficits and a Marxist-style central bank albeit run by a private banking cartel. Next blow came with J Edgar Hoover and his replacement Roosevelt. Not only creating much of the great depression, but worsening it and making the best out of Keynesian lunacy.
During the first couple of decades of the 20th century bill after bill passed further deteriorating what once was the land of the free. Anti-drug laws to stop Negroes from raping white women were one such stupidity. Prohibition, which lead to the rise of the mafia and an unprecedented boozing never seen or heard of before or since, was another.
With the murder of JFK and the undemocratic, yet slightly understandable, anti-communist era and then Vietnam and the abolishment of the Gold Standard yet more stabs was made against the dying corps. Despite a slight upswing in the 1980’s things has really been going to hell since the 70’s.
The Clinton administration helped build the bubble economy and created many of the entities we talk about today such as Franny and Freddie and with the burst of the dot-com bubble the floodgates really opened. Perpetrated by the banking cartels and a hairless warmongering chimp at the white house the last vestiges of civil freedom started to wither away. 9/11 didn’t really help either and pretty much ever since the US economy’s only real ‘growth’ has come from the war industry.
Today the country is a house of cards, only kept afloat by wars (higher GDP), the biggest spending spree in history (on borrowed money), consumption (over 70% of the economy) and the USD which is the world’s reserve currency hence means they can scam both the American public and the rest of us into an ever accelerating debt mountain that is very likely to turn into hyperinflation the coming years.
In today’s America capitalism hardly exists at all. Entrepreneurs and the hard working middle class are still upholding some capitalist ideals, but in actuality the US is closer to Soviet socialism than capitalism. And the Obamination isn’t really making things better...
And the American dream? Sure Americans has made mistakes and done its share of damage to the world before in history, but for a very long time they never lost that dream. Today, that is almost gone too. Still alive under the surface but slowly sinking further and further away.
One after the other the presidents and their followers have together with corporate interests, unions and the politically correct slowly, but surely, deteriorated the former land of the free into the land of the serfs. Turning it into another country among many.
The American founding fathers and the constitution they created cannot be overstated in importance. But today America is turning into (to a large extent there already) the very thing its founding fathers hated, the very thing they fled from and the thing that all those millions upon millions of emigrants fled from: an oppressive socialist/fascist/collectivist (whatever you wanna call it) state built on the notion of printing money and government spending.
Once upon a time I too dreamt of going across the Atlantic to the home of the brave, now I don’t see the point. 15y ago when I started to look around the world for a future home and a first work abroad, the first thing I looked at was USA’s labor market and were within that country I would prefer to live. Today, I don’t even look there. Not at all.
And I am not alone. Mexicans are, for the first time ever, leaving Los Angeles and going back to Mexico despite the escalating civil war that goes on there.
The poor, homeless and huddled masses yearning for free air aren’t really welcome to America’s shores anymore, they could be terrorists.
This is a very short description of course; I’ve not even mentioned false flag attacks, corporatism, imperialistic tendencies or a failing school system. Also I have mainly focused on the badness, there are still good things with the US, it is still one of the best countries on the planet and people still run to it and I rather live there than in Zimbabwe - although the monetary policies of both countries are about the same.
However the dream that was America is probably already gone. And with it so is the great hope for mankind.
But I cannot help feeling some optimism. If it was any other country, regardless of time in history, Geographic’s or people, I would say that this was it, the decaying body would soon gone, forever. America however still has that foundation there… somewhere…
What is needed is a renaissance, a rise from the ashes. Please resurrect soon America, the rest of the world needs you, the real you, not the warmongering slaughtering of Muslim you.
Monday, April 5, 2010
Was 9/11 a staged attack?
I’ve been, once again, going over the evidence and the lack thereof for a possibility that the attack on the US was a staged attack. Whether or not such an alleged false flag attack was committed by banksters, oil companies, Israeli commandoes or by the government itself haven’t been my main concern. What I wanted was to either confirm my earlier firm belief that this was real or to reconsider this conviction.
This is important because almost everything that has happened since, from the fascist control-grid comes to internet to the invasion of Afghanistan, from the patriot act to the execution of Saddam, can be traced back to 9/11.
Especially I wanted to know why incidents like the latest leaked video of American troops committing war crimes and shooting unarmed people trying to help wounded could come to be.
I am inherently suspicious of government and have no problem believing in the existence of false flag attacks. Those have been committed before, also by US governments, so why not again? This makes me ‘partial’ to believe in the conspiracy thought and this is vital to acknowledge since it impacts the end result.
Watching, reading and seeing it all again my initial conclusion still stands, I still do not believe in the conspiracy, but I am slightly less convinced.
There are too many ‘coincidences’, too many faults, too many unanswered questions for anyone to be sure one way or the other. There are experts and arguments on both sides making sense. I would certainly want to see another investigation so in that aspect I agree with the “truthers”. And if a large portion of people believe that, as they do, that is certainly enough to launch another examination of the facts, especially since so many lives are impacted by this event and so many wars and atrocities are committed in its name.
I think this, together with the total disregard for the alternative view and bashing of the so called “truthers” are what actually makes the most compelling evidence for this being a false flag attack. Or, as I think is far more likely, a cover-up to hide government incompetence and certain individuals that should have known better and acted differently.
Was 9/11 a false flag attack? Probably not. Did the government fail? Sure, you bet ya. Did the government or some parts of the government deliberately fail? Maybe. Are they trying to cover up their incompetence? Most likely.
Maybe in 40-50 years with some new books, deathbed confessions and some declassified documents on the table we will know, until then this story will live on...
This is important because almost everything that has happened since, from the fascist control-grid comes to internet to the invasion of Afghanistan, from the patriot act to the execution of Saddam, can be traced back to 9/11.
Especially I wanted to know why incidents like the latest leaked video of American troops committing war crimes and shooting unarmed people trying to help wounded could come to be.
I am inherently suspicious of government and have no problem believing in the existence of false flag attacks. Those have been committed before, also by US governments, so why not again? This makes me ‘partial’ to believe in the conspiracy thought and this is vital to acknowledge since it impacts the end result.
Watching, reading and seeing it all again my initial conclusion still stands, I still do not believe in the conspiracy, but I am slightly less convinced.
There are too many ‘coincidences’, too many faults, too many unanswered questions for anyone to be sure one way or the other. There are experts and arguments on both sides making sense. I would certainly want to see another investigation so in that aspect I agree with the “truthers”. And if a large portion of people believe that, as they do, that is certainly enough to launch another examination of the facts, especially since so many lives are impacted by this event and so many wars and atrocities are committed in its name.
I think this, together with the total disregard for the alternative view and bashing of the so called “truthers” are what actually makes the most compelling evidence for this being a false flag attack. Or, as I think is far more likely, a cover-up to hide government incompetence and certain individuals that should have known better and acted differently.
Was 9/11 a false flag attack? Probably not. Did the government fail? Sure, you bet ya. Did the government or some parts of the government deliberately fail? Maybe. Are they trying to cover up their incompetence? Most likely.
Maybe in 40-50 years with some new books, deathbed confessions and some declassified documents on the table we will know, until then this story will live on...
Murderers!! Thugs!! War Criminals!!
Oh my… this is beyond belief and you should watch this. Watch the whole piece.
I feel sick, horrified. This is a game for these American idiots!!
If you watch all of it you see at least one, possible three war crimes being committed.
Are you still wondering why they want to close down Wikileaks and control internet?
BE WARNED! This is very graphic.
aAAharrg… FUCK!!
I feel sick, horrified. This is a game for these American idiots!!
If you watch all of it you see at least one, possible three war crimes being committed.
Are you still wondering why they want to close down Wikileaks and control internet?
BE WARNED! This is very graphic.
aAAharrg… FUCK!!
Time to buy stocks in the porn industry
Can you spot the robot?
I was reading this post from Anna Raccoon, and although I find her sentiment about the Gorgon and similar masters of our faith to hold some truth and I can see many different applications for this kind of technology, but what immediately strikes my mind is ‘porn’.
The technology to have sex online, I mean ‘real’ sex such as you can ‘feel’ the person on the other side of the screen already exists. Although a bit too expensive for the common man, it is just a matter of time. And whenever these robots are applied with sexual… attributes… in working order they will probably revolutionize the sex industry even more then movies ever did.
Will the time of the prostitute soon be over? And if so, what implications will this have on legislation? Is it still rape if you’re doing it with a robot? If you’d programmed the robot to perform felatio, is that still a crime in Missouri? How about if you make a tiny adolescent-looking robot and have sex with it, should that constitute as rape of a minor or kiddy porn? How about those priest eh? Can they make a robot of a young boy and sadomize him without having to endure, well... nothing from the Vatican?
You know what would be funny? Robot rights activist groups! Claiming that robots should be treated humanely...
But before we get to all that, we’ll probably see a lot of debates over how climate friendly robots are. Is a robot really compatible with the Church of Climatology? Maybe I shouldn’t even be mentioning this connection? Who knows maybe those climate insanoes will advocate that robots should replace humans? It wouldn’t surprise me even the slightest.
And maybe it is a human right to own a robot? It shouldn’t only be for the rich and horny, right?
Whatever your thoughts are I suggest that you soon look over what porn will benefit the most and maybe consider putting some money into it.
The pretend animosity
Something that has been going on for quite a while now is the merger of politicos within and in-between political parties. They are all becoming the same party. The political party. Well, actually this has already happened, maybe not totally, it is still possible to find slim differences, at least in the rhetoric, but in actuality and as in consequence for your vote the disparity is hardly detectable.
This is particularly noticeable whenever something threatens the hegemony of The Political Party. If a threat of alternative emerges that loathes the EU, wants to bring the problems with immigration up on the table or Pirates wanting to stop the Orwellian nightmare from coming true, or if someone says that their Church of Climatology is a fraud, then watch The Political Party go to work. We are back to Neolithic tribalism. Insult one member of a tribe and they all come after you.
As a libertarian I know this tribal thinking very well. A libertarian isn’t only against The Political Party, such a person is often also against any alternative. We don’t only fight fascists, racists, socialists and mainstream pundits; we also fight liberals, conservatives, religious freaks and tree hugging loons. Pretty much everyone on this planet is our adversary, so believe me when I say that I know how the Pirate Parties, the Racist Parties and how any anti-establishment party feels.
In Sweden as well as in the UK there are general elections this year. And in true One Party sentiment the enemies of the people i.e. politicians, brainless journalists, wannabe dictators and fraudulent pranksters of all colors and religions come together before the general election in an effort to sell the idea that they believe in different ideologies, that there’s a difference in who rule us and that there’s hostility among the elite.
Just have a look at the HealthCare debate in the US. The Republicans pretend to be against the Democratic suggestion, seemingly against public healthcare, but they are the ones that created this monster in the first place and they do want public healthcare, only not the Democratic one. The Democratic Party bash the republicans for being against the poor since they want to abolish 'free' public healthcare, which they, as said, don't want to do.
The goal of this trickery is of course to convince us to vote for any of the established political parties and engage ourselves in the theatre.
‘A vote for a third party is a wasted vote’ –is one of the main arguments being heard from foot soldiers of The Political Party. Another popular theme is the bashing of the supposed adversary, something that is eagerly followed by media hence automatically cutting out any alternative view.
The right is of course fighting for the rich and the privileged while eating babies’ in-between collecting money from big business and growing a black mustache while wearing a tophat. The left is of course taxation freaks straight out of hell spawn to do unspeakable evil to families and bring forth the end of civilization.
Any smaller parties, if they are established and sleeps with The Political Party, can also be a part of this game. Often such smaller entities get to wear one (maybe two) attributes easily attacked. Religious parties for instance often get the gay-bashing and anti-woman label. Green parties want to stop progress and bring us all back to live in caves. And so on.
These attacks and pretend animosity is quoted and lifted up as top-news every day before any general election.
The fact that they all want you to obey the law, they all want you to pay your taxes, they all want you to vote, they all want you spend your money and they all want you to go to school and learn how to be a good citizen, is ignored.
And they all fight wars for the sake of puppies, Children and fluffy clouds.
No matter who sits in government they fight the ‘war’ against drugs, the ‘war’ against poverty, the ‘war’ against inflation, the ‘war’ against unemployment. These are all unwinnable ‘wars’ almost always created by government and the politically correct themselves, but the sheople of this world always buy the rhetoric.
And no matter who is in charge the rules of the land (laws) keep expanding in quantity, size and intrusion into our lives. Not a single political party - with libertarian exceptions in some countries - has any intention of reducing the number of laws.
That the only real difference is a couple of percentage up or down comes to taxes and welfare checks, is also ignored. So is the fact that the European Union nowadays resides and decides over 70% (according to some 80-85%) of our laws. That globalization, huge corporations and anti-democratic institutions like the UN or the IMF also play a central role in any decision-making goes by unnoticed.
But the most important power, those with actual authority no-one ever speaks about, is never mentioned. At all.
The ones I’m talking about isn’t some elusive Bilderberg-group and this isn’t a conspiracy, it’s a fact. The ones I am talking about are the bureaucrats and non-elected righteous people behind the curtain.
You see with the rising of the welfare state and the unification of The Political Party those contrived to control the government can be found among departments, lobby-groups and within the structure.
They can have been hired or created by the ‘right’ or by the ‘left’, that has no meaning, they stay put no matter who gets elected. You can even fire a couple of them, but then three other will take the two’s place. Or they can be a part of some elitist group that for some reason have reached sainthood such as a female rights activist group.
These are the politically correct thugs that no matter what always strive to increase their funding and their power.
Who do you think has most power over a proposed bill, those elected to parliament or the ones actually writing the bill, commenting on it, lobbying for/against it and benefiting/ getting hurt by it?
This righteous and politically correct pile of scum have any government, no matter who they are or what ideology they are said to belong to trained to accept their every pronouncement and trained to accept the general structure as a 'done deal'. All that is left is to cut a bit around the edges, no changes, oh no, only a slight improvement, a slim adjustment, nothing else. And damn anyone not complying with this set of rules.
If a politician steps out of line saying he wants to eliminate any of these power houses he will not last very long. Because if anyone says or does anything of the sort, the entire elitists supremacy comes out in unison to shoot that person down with every dirty trick in the book. The Political Party does not abide well to any heretic, and the righteous and morally impervious will not hold back the punches.
In this game for more funding and more power everyone becomes a pawn.
For example the blacks and the gays are a means to an end. As is anyone overweight, anyone disabled,anyone different in any way at all. They are tools in virtuous hands. The 'equality' mafia doesn’t care if Muslims get the blame for their ridiculous assertions of offence or if immigrants that have been thrown out in rundown suburbs without work commits crime. Those shadowy figures encouraging black or gay militancy are not necessarily black or gay themselves.
It’s all a means to an end.
And the ‘end’ is to gain power, increase their department, to hire more useless workers sitting around doing nothing. The ‘end’ is about control, control over our lives as in controlling our smoking, drugs, driving, alcohol, sex or marriage.
They know better, they only want what is best for you, if you only listen the world will be a much better place, and if you don’t listen they will send you invoices to pay for their scam anyway or, which becomes more likely as the number of laws increases, throw you in jail.
And just as the righteous and politically correct, The Political Party has a real agenda. You see decision making in the world of the jesters and deceitful “übermench” within The Political Party is based upon vote-maximization. They would like you to think it is about ideology, differences between right and left and that they all care about the less privileged, nothing can be further from the truth.
For the individual politician it is about gaining a seat, having a taste of that wonderful buffet of tax money, and to have a piece of that control-grid in order to silence those Napoleonic voices they hear whispering in their ears. For The Political Party the game is about having, keeping, and expanding power.
In this strive for vote-maximization and more funding and control the political elite and the righteous behind the curtain are in cahoots. One implies the other.
In order to reach this goal together they employ several tactics.
The ‘wars’ mentioned above is such a tactic, another one is to have us looking at the left hand waving in our face while the right hand does something unspeakable behind their back. An example of this is while they are riding in limousines, flying private jets, lives in lavish mansions and dining and feasting for your tax money they wave pictures of Polar Bears in your face claiming that manmade global warming will kill all human infants tomorrow.
Another tactic, and probably the most common used, is that of group-thinking. We all belong to ‘groups’. It can be religious, ethnic, gender, geographical or even sports groups. If they manage to pit one group against the other they can play on that for ages.
It’s not the righteous or The Political Party’s fault that those skinheads and immigrants fight each other, nope, it is the groups, one evil racist one everyone should hate and one poor, underprivileged group that are the good guys, but in reality only used as voting cattle.
Rich white men in suits are another group everyone is supposed to hate, or so the rich and predominantly white men in suits belonging to the morally correct and The Political Party says.
Oh, and smokers! Everyone should hate smokers. They bring cancer to our shores.
And fat people are horrible obese things costing bundles of cash and the main reason why our healthcare system doesn’t work. Also thin people. Lettuce eating skeletons walking down the runway are among the worst things in this world.
Everyone with a penis is a walking rapist. A person wearing a turban is potentially a terrorist.
These groups, and many more, are engaged in an epic battle for supreme domination and you’ll better always stand with the righteous and The Political Party because they stand for the goodness and equality that will stop the group-fighting and bring peace to our time.
All you haft to do is to vote for them, and, of course, not complain too much.
This is particularly noticeable whenever something threatens the hegemony of The Political Party. If a threat of alternative emerges that loathes the EU, wants to bring the problems with immigration up on the table or Pirates wanting to stop the Orwellian nightmare from coming true, or if someone says that their Church of Climatology is a fraud, then watch The Political Party go to work. We are back to Neolithic tribalism. Insult one member of a tribe and they all come after you.
As a libertarian I know this tribal thinking very well. A libertarian isn’t only against The Political Party, such a person is often also against any alternative. We don’t only fight fascists, racists, socialists and mainstream pundits; we also fight liberals, conservatives, religious freaks and tree hugging loons. Pretty much everyone on this planet is our adversary, so believe me when I say that I know how the Pirate Parties, the Racist Parties and how any anti-establishment party feels.
In Sweden as well as in the UK there are general elections this year. And in true One Party sentiment the enemies of the people i.e. politicians, brainless journalists, wannabe dictators and fraudulent pranksters of all colors and religions come together before the general election in an effort to sell the idea that they believe in different ideologies, that there’s a difference in who rule us and that there’s hostility among the elite.
Just have a look at the HealthCare debate in the US. The Republicans pretend to be against the Democratic suggestion, seemingly against public healthcare, but they are the ones that created this monster in the first place and they do want public healthcare, only not the Democratic one. The Democratic Party bash the republicans for being against the poor since they want to abolish 'free' public healthcare, which they, as said, don't want to do.
The goal of this trickery is of course to convince us to vote for any of the established political parties and engage ourselves in the theatre.
‘A vote for a third party is a wasted vote’ –is one of the main arguments being heard from foot soldiers of The Political Party. Another popular theme is the bashing of the supposed adversary, something that is eagerly followed by media hence automatically cutting out any alternative view.
The right is of course fighting for the rich and the privileged while eating babies’ in-between collecting money from big business and growing a black mustache while wearing a tophat. The left is of course taxation freaks straight out of hell spawn to do unspeakable evil to families and bring forth the end of civilization.
Any smaller parties, if they are established and sleeps with The Political Party, can also be a part of this game. Often such smaller entities get to wear one (maybe two) attributes easily attacked. Religious parties for instance often get the gay-bashing and anti-woman label. Green parties want to stop progress and bring us all back to live in caves. And so on.
These attacks and pretend animosity is quoted and lifted up as top-news every day before any general election.
The fact that they all want you to obey the law, they all want you to pay your taxes, they all want you to vote, they all want you spend your money and they all want you to go to school and learn how to be a good citizen, is ignored.
And they all fight wars for the sake of puppies, Children and fluffy clouds.
No matter who sits in government they fight the ‘war’ against drugs, the ‘war’ against poverty, the ‘war’ against inflation, the ‘war’ against unemployment. These are all unwinnable ‘wars’ almost always created by government and the politically correct themselves, but the sheople of this world always buy the rhetoric.
And no matter who is in charge the rules of the land (laws) keep expanding in quantity, size and intrusion into our lives. Not a single political party - with libertarian exceptions in some countries - has any intention of reducing the number of laws.
That the only real difference is a couple of percentage up or down comes to taxes and welfare checks, is also ignored. So is the fact that the European Union nowadays resides and decides over 70% (according to some 80-85%) of our laws. That globalization, huge corporations and anti-democratic institutions like the UN or the IMF also play a central role in any decision-making goes by unnoticed.
But the most important power, those with actual authority no-one ever speaks about, is never mentioned. At all.
The ones I’m talking about isn’t some elusive Bilderberg-group and this isn’t a conspiracy, it’s a fact. The ones I am talking about are the bureaucrats and non-elected righteous people behind the curtain.
You see with the rising of the welfare state and the unification of The Political Party those contrived to control the government can be found among departments, lobby-groups and within the structure.
They can have been hired or created by the ‘right’ or by the ‘left’, that has no meaning, they stay put no matter who gets elected. You can even fire a couple of them, but then three other will take the two’s place. Or they can be a part of some elitist group that for some reason have reached sainthood such as a female rights activist group.
These are the politically correct thugs that no matter what always strive to increase their funding and their power.
Who do you think has most power over a proposed bill, those elected to parliament or the ones actually writing the bill, commenting on it, lobbying for/against it and benefiting/ getting hurt by it?
This righteous and politically correct pile of scum have any government, no matter who they are or what ideology they are said to belong to trained to accept their every pronouncement and trained to accept the general structure as a 'done deal'. All that is left is to cut a bit around the edges, no changes, oh no, only a slight improvement, a slim adjustment, nothing else. And damn anyone not complying with this set of rules.
If a politician steps out of line saying he wants to eliminate any of these power houses he will not last very long. Because if anyone says or does anything of the sort, the entire elitists supremacy comes out in unison to shoot that person down with every dirty trick in the book. The Political Party does not abide well to any heretic, and the righteous and morally impervious will not hold back the punches.
In this game for more funding and more power everyone becomes a pawn.
For example the blacks and the gays are a means to an end. As is anyone overweight, anyone disabled,anyone different in any way at all. They are tools in virtuous hands. The 'equality' mafia doesn’t care if Muslims get the blame for their ridiculous assertions of offence or if immigrants that have been thrown out in rundown suburbs without work commits crime. Those shadowy figures encouraging black or gay militancy are not necessarily black or gay themselves.
It’s all a means to an end.
And the ‘end’ is to gain power, increase their department, to hire more useless workers sitting around doing nothing. The ‘end’ is about control, control over our lives as in controlling our smoking, drugs, driving, alcohol, sex or marriage.
They know better, they only want what is best for you, if you only listen the world will be a much better place, and if you don’t listen they will send you invoices to pay for their scam anyway or, which becomes more likely as the number of laws increases, throw you in jail.
And just as the righteous and politically correct, The Political Party has a real agenda. You see decision making in the world of the jesters and deceitful “übermench” within The Political Party is based upon vote-maximization. They would like you to think it is about ideology, differences between right and left and that they all care about the less privileged, nothing can be further from the truth.
For the individual politician it is about gaining a seat, having a taste of that wonderful buffet of tax money, and to have a piece of that control-grid in order to silence those Napoleonic voices they hear whispering in their ears. For The Political Party the game is about having, keeping, and expanding power.
In this strive for vote-maximization and more funding and control the political elite and the righteous behind the curtain are in cahoots. One implies the other.
In order to reach this goal together they employ several tactics.
The ‘wars’ mentioned above is such a tactic, another one is to have us looking at the left hand waving in our face while the right hand does something unspeakable behind their back. An example of this is while they are riding in limousines, flying private jets, lives in lavish mansions and dining and feasting for your tax money they wave pictures of Polar Bears in your face claiming that manmade global warming will kill all human infants tomorrow.
Another tactic, and probably the most common used, is that of group-thinking. We all belong to ‘groups’. It can be religious, ethnic, gender, geographical or even sports groups. If they manage to pit one group against the other they can play on that for ages.
It’s not the righteous or The Political Party’s fault that those skinheads and immigrants fight each other, nope, it is the groups, one evil racist one everyone should hate and one poor, underprivileged group that are the good guys, but in reality only used as voting cattle.
Rich white men in suits are another group everyone is supposed to hate, or so the rich and predominantly white men in suits belonging to the morally correct and The Political Party says.
Oh, and smokers! Everyone should hate smokers. They bring cancer to our shores.
And fat people are horrible obese things costing bundles of cash and the main reason why our healthcare system doesn’t work. Also thin people. Lettuce eating skeletons walking down the runway are among the worst things in this world.
Everyone with a penis is a walking rapist. A person wearing a turban is potentially a terrorist.
These groups, and many more, are engaged in an epic battle for supreme domination and you’ll better always stand with the righteous and The Political Party because they stand for the goodness and equality that will stop the group-fighting and bring peace to our time.
All you haft to do is to vote for them, and, of course, not complain too much.
Sunday, April 4, 2010
Mama said knock you out!
“I was absolutely furious with him. All that was going through my head was to knock him [Gorgon Brownie] out.”
Those are the words of Britain's highest decorated serving soldier and winner of the Victoria Cross, Lance Corporal Johnson Beharry.
L/Cpl Beharry said that Mr Brown had not looked him or any other servicemen in the eye at a reception in Downing Street in November 2008.
To be fair, the one-eyed Scotsman hardly looks anyone in the straight in the face. He might throw a phone at you if he acknowledges your presence, but that’s pretty much it.
Then in Westminster Abbey during the Remembrance Day service last November he said the Prime Minister was “fidgeting and moving” during the two minute silence.
“I've got head and back injuries that put me back in hospital in a lot of pain quite regularly, so if I could do it there's no reason he couldn't," he said. "It was very rude.
Again I need to come to the Prime Mentalists rescue a bit. We’ve all heard the stories about drugs and certain ailments. Even though far from being confirmed by Downing Street, maybe, just maybe those ailments do cause a certain wobble?
“When he offered his hand to me I just turned around and walked away. I wanted him to think about his actions and it worked.”
A very nice and British way of smacking someone in the face I would say.
I once loudly called Sweden’s current Labor Minister a Fascist during a dinner party, this when I was a member of the same party and that was a very restraint and nice way of putting it. A body slam with the flying elbow as a follow-up would have been more appropriate.
The Gorgon is a much worse thug, so Lance Corporal Johnson Beharry must truly be a real gentleman and, depending on how you look at it, a good example of the British armed forces.
Those are the words of Britain's highest decorated serving soldier and winner of the Victoria Cross, Lance Corporal Johnson Beharry.
L/Cpl Beharry said that Mr Brown had not looked him or any other servicemen in the eye at a reception in Downing Street in November 2008.
To be fair, the one-eyed Scotsman hardly looks anyone in the straight in the face. He might throw a phone at you if he acknowledges your presence, but that’s pretty much it.
Then in Westminster Abbey during the Remembrance Day service last November he said the Prime Minister was “fidgeting and moving” during the two minute silence.
“I've got head and back injuries that put me back in hospital in a lot of pain quite regularly, so if I could do it there's no reason he couldn't," he said. "It was very rude.
Again I need to come to the Prime Mentalists rescue a bit. We’ve all heard the stories about drugs and certain ailments. Even though far from being confirmed by Downing Street, maybe, just maybe those ailments do cause a certain wobble?
“When he offered his hand to me I just turned around and walked away. I wanted him to think about his actions and it worked.”
A very nice and British way of smacking someone in the face I would say.
I once loudly called Sweden’s current Labor Minister a Fascist during a dinner party, this when I was a member of the same party and that was a very restraint and nice way of putting it. A body slam with the flying elbow as a follow-up would have been more appropriate.
The Gorgon is a much worse thug, so Lance Corporal Johnson Beharry must truly be a real gentleman and, depending on how you look at it, a good example of the British armed forces.
Shaky warzone
The situation over in Mexico is turning towards worse for each day that passes. And I am not talking about some average earthquake. I’ve been writing about the unwinnable drug war the Mexican government started and continues to escalate for a long time now.
It is time for people of this earth (excluding government that never will acknowledge it) to realize two things; firstly that the “war against drugs” is unwinnable. It doesn’t matter how severe punishments there are for peddling drugs are or how many police officers you put into the equation, it has no barring whatsoever if you throw the military at kingpins, it will always, without exception, fail. Secondly it is the ‘war’ itself that creates the problems, not the drugs or the gangs. In effect it is the government that is at fault, not the mafia or the terrorists.
Since the Mexican government stepped up their unwinnable war close to 20,000 people have died, the costs has escalated with hundreds of billions, and now the cartels are starting to attack military installations.
Apparently coordinated attacks by dozens of gunmen took place last week targeting two army garrisons in northern Mexico. Military patrols and checkpoints have repeatedly come under fire in Tamaulipas and Nuevo Leon, where armed gangs have raised roadblocks in the middle of cities and around army bases.
Jailbreaks are now so common in Mexico that most inmates don’t expect to sit off their sentences. And entire towns are being evacuated, some voluntary, others by force by drug gangs. Yeah, you read it right. Entire communities are being told by the cartels to leave or die.
Almost every day heads from decapitated bodies are found. And things are not calming down in any way, on the contrary. More and more bloggers and independent sources are talking about a civil war, which the Mexican authorities as well as their criminal counterparts in Washington are ignoring or trying to hide.
Let’s put this in a mathematical term.
I + HP + HC = HP
In this equation I stand for ‘illegality’, HP stands for ‘higher punishment’, HC is ‘higher costs’ and the summation HP is ‘higher profits’. This is contingent on people wanting drugs, which we know they always have and always will.
If you make something illegal profits for selling it goes up. If you increase punishment and in other ways increase the costs for making and selling it, profits go up.
So when the Mexican government throws military at gangs, all they really do is make the profits go way up. If they lock up a couple of gangster, then profits for those outside jail go up and that’s an invitation for more people to join in.
The solution, the only sensible and actually working solution is of course to legalize drugs. If drugs were legal they would be sold at supermarkets at a fraction of the cost and scrutinized by the market. And almost every criminal organization, as well as most terrorist groups, would disappear.
This civil war in Mexico could be over tomorrow if they legalized drugs. But you see, the government doesn’t want that, not for any nice protecting of you reason, oh no, they want this war because when there’s a war going on, who do we turn to for protection? Yes, that’s right… This is also why they are fighting the war against terrorism, the war against poverty, the war against unemployment, the war against inflation. All of these things are created by government and then fought by government under the disguise of "war".
So when a quake at the magnitude of 7.2 topples buildings and shake things up a bit, it cannot hold a candle to the damage being done to the Mexican people by their government.
It is time for people of this earth (excluding government that never will acknowledge it) to realize two things; firstly that the “war against drugs” is unwinnable. It doesn’t matter how severe punishments there are for peddling drugs are or how many police officers you put into the equation, it has no barring whatsoever if you throw the military at kingpins, it will always, without exception, fail. Secondly it is the ‘war’ itself that creates the problems, not the drugs or the gangs. In effect it is the government that is at fault, not the mafia or the terrorists.
Since the Mexican government stepped up their unwinnable war close to 20,000 people have died, the costs has escalated with hundreds of billions, and now the cartels are starting to attack military installations.
Apparently coordinated attacks by dozens of gunmen took place last week targeting two army garrisons in northern Mexico. Military patrols and checkpoints have repeatedly come under fire in Tamaulipas and Nuevo Leon, where armed gangs have raised roadblocks in the middle of cities and around army bases.
Jailbreaks are now so common in Mexico that most inmates don’t expect to sit off their sentences. And entire towns are being evacuated, some voluntary, others by force by drug gangs. Yeah, you read it right. Entire communities are being told by the cartels to leave or die.
Almost every day heads from decapitated bodies are found. And things are not calming down in any way, on the contrary. More and more bloggers and independent sources are talking about a civil war, which the Mexican authorities as well as their criminal counterparts in Washington are ignoring or trying to hide.
Let’s put this in a mathematical term.
I + HP + HC = HP
In this equation I stand for ‘illegality’, HP stands for ‘higher punishment’, HC is ‘higher costs’ and the summation HP is ‘higher profits’. This is contingent on people wanting drugs, which we know they always have and always will.
If you make something illegal profits for selling it goes up. If you increase punishment and in other ways increase the costs for making and selling it, profits go up.
So when the Mexican government throws military at gangs, all they really do is make the profits go way up. If they lock up a couple of gangster, then profits for those outside jail go up and that’s an invitation for more people to join in.
The solution, the only sensible and actually working solution is of course to legalize drugs. If drugs were legal they would be sold at supermarkets at a fraction of the cost and scrutinized by the market. And almost every criminal organization, as well as most terrorist groups, would disappear.
This civil war in Mexico could be over tomorrow if they legalized drugs. But you see, the government doesn’t want that, not for any nice protecting of you reason, oh no, they want this war because when there’s a war going on, who do we turn to for protection? Yes, that’s right… This is also why they are fighting the war against terrorism, the war against poverty, the war against unemployment, the war against inflation. All of these things are created by government and then fought by government under the disguise of "war".
So when a quake at the magnitude of 7.2 topples buildings and shake things up a bit, it cannot hold a candle to the damage being done to the Mexican people by their government.
Let’s play the latest Japanese game!
It is called “how to bring oneself to fiscal suicide”
Japanese GDP : 480 trillion yen
Japanese Government Debt (only Federal) : 637 trillion yen (137% of GDP)
Federal Expenditure (2010) : 92.3 trillion
…of which ~20.5 trillion yen is debt servicing cost
Accordingly, the average debt servicing cost is (20.5/637 = ) 3.24%
Federal taxes and other revenue is 44.3 trillion yen, which means borrowing is 48 trillion yen.
Expenditure ex. debt servicing is 71.65 trillion, of which 48 trillion (roughly 2/3) is borrowed.
If you read the last line in the fact-box again, you realize that this is a real horror story. After paying interest on its debt, Japan has only 23.65 trillion yen left, yet it spends 71.65 trillion...
Read more over at Save Capitalism
Japanese GDP : 480 trillion yen
Japanese Government Debt (only Federal) : 637 trillion yen (137% of GDP)
Federal Expenditure (2010) : 92.3 trillion
…of which ~20.5 trillion yen is debt servicing cost
Accordingly, the average debt servicing cost is (20.5/637 = ) 3.24%
Federal taxes and other revenue is 44.3 trillion yen, which means borrowing is 48 trillion yen.
Expenditure ex. debt servicing is 71.65 trillion, of which 48 trillion (roughly 2/3) is borrowed.
If you read the last line in the fact-box again, you realize that this is a real horror story. After paying interest on its debt, Japan has only 23.65 trillion yen left, yet it spends 71.65 trillion...
Read more over at Save Capitalism
What volcanoes, US bombs and earthquakes couldn’t do…
Is immigration at fault?
A 78-year-old woman in the southern Swedish city of Landskrona lost consciousness after she was punched in the face while trying to intervene on behalf of her 71-year-old partner who was being attacked by a man in a parking dispute. The woman later died at the hospital.
The 23-year-old main suspect is facing charges of murder and aggravated assault, but has denied the allegations.
You never know in a case like this and I don’t have the police investigation in front of me, so there is chance the guy is innocent, although not very likely when you read about the incident in papers and watch the news.
However, he is of foreign origin and has a foreign name so whether he’s innocent or not have no real barring to the uproar in the community. And, of course, the Swedish Democrats (SD) that are the made-up “right-wing racist” party, loves this. It is a crime, it is a crime against the elderly by a very sick and cowardly person and it is a crime supposedly, and most likely, committed by an immigrant.
Some genius “expert” commentator said the other day that SD is using the martyr-card to gain support. Next he will probably declare that gravity exists or that the sun is warm. But what that “expert” and many others are missing is that it’s not SDs fault, not really. They can just sit back and relax. Just send an article to a paper or sit in the morning sofa once a week, then they can lay back and let the mainstream pundits bash them into fame and parliament.
And when a story like this brake out it’s yet another open goal.
Both the government and the opposition have solemnly declared that they will never form a coalition with the “racists” and that they will cut them out as much as possible. In the meantime journalists are competing in the game of who can trash and ridicule SD the most.
What the public see in all this, those that don't react with the auto-responder permanently cranked up to 'racist-Nazi-bigot-neanderthal-thug' every time those two letters are mentioned. People who would not have dreamed of voting SD, who might otherwise have heard little to nothing of that party, are wondering what all the fuss is about. Why is the government so scared of them? Why are they so desperate to silence this small party? What do they offer that the government doesn't?
And even more so, people that actually live in reality, in the real world where immigration and refugees actually pose a problem or at least some nuisance, those people see events like this murder as something the elite does nothing about. Sure the murderer might get caught and punished, but the next incident is just around the corner.
And so it doesn’t matter if journalists find criminals within SD, which party hasn’t criminals as members? Aren’t they all criminals? What if some article or pamphlet is riddled with holes? How many of the elitists aren’t lying to us each day? Are we supposed to care more because one party gets “caught” lying but not the other one?
Let's face it; so many people are so tired of our politicians - all of them - that they would be interested in voting for any party that the nosegoblins say they shouldn't.
The establishment might as well start printing 'Vote SD' badges ready for the next election.
This post isn't actually about the SD. So anyone currently suffering tinnitus and steam coming from their ears, chill out, have a smoke and a double brandy and relax. It is not a post in support of the SD nor is it a post attacking the SD. This is about the problem that immigration poses, what it potentially had to do with this murder and why the Swedish Democrats are gaining momentum.
Immigration means that a group of people that may look different or have a different religion are running, fleeing or just moving and might end up in your neighborhood.
The normal thing to do for these new citizens would be to learn the local language, get a job and work themselves into the society. I actually know how it is, having lived in several countries myself, it’s not always so easy. However this is seldom how it works.
To a certain degree these immigrants are to blame for being lazy idiots, but one also needs to realize that most countries have some kind of “plan” to take care of and handle the “helpless”. Often this little “plan” involves seeing all people that are not the norm as “helpless” and - of course - they need lots of welfare, support and “help” in all kinds of ways.
Never are they left alone getting the chance of trying to make it; they obviously cannot, they are “helpless”.
These “helpless” people than need to get past several obstacles on the labor market where unions and politicians have made it very hard for people to get a job. Minimum wage is one such stupidity making it much harder for the young and immigrants to get a decent job.
Many of these “helpless” people are also highly educated and have a degree in this or that. In Sweden for instance several of the crossing guards and personnel at the subway in Stockholm are former CEO’s, doctors and nurses. Not being able to get a job for what they are trained and educated for they try to earn some money within the rules.
As if it wasn’t enough being labeled “helpless” and being ignored by the labor-markets, they also, to some extent, get welfare-money and useless stupid education thingies thrown at them in addition to being driven to live among their peers out in some suburb. In other words it is not hard to see the foundation for conflicts and resentments, not mainly for the first ones arriving, they are probably just happy to have left their country/conflict or whatever, but their children ending up with the same problems and same labels will have problems. This is not an excuse for violent or lawbreaking behavior, just a fact needed to be considered into the equation.
No matter if you are Swedish, English or whatever, getting a bunch of foreign people coming to “your home country” and claiming a piece of that pie is kind of annoying. Since journalists, politicians and most economists keep claiming that there is a certain amount of money that – of course – needs to be distributed by the political system, this implies that more people living on the same pie means less all around and maybe even nil for some of the ethnic ones (horrid thought…).
The whole situation is fueled by those little things that keep bugging the hell out of even none-judgmental people; like banning the waving of the national flag or the outlawing of certain prayers or songs that might “offend” the newcomers.
In Sweden this can take absurd turns banning schoolchildren from attending church on graduation or people getting physically forced to remove the Swedish flag from their balcony. All this creates resentments and when an economic crisis, a war or something of that nature occurs; racists come out of the woodwork having a perfect little pile of animosity to dig out idiots from.
Would this old lady have been alive if it wasn’t for immigration? Perhaps. Would rape and violent crimes statistics be lower if it wasn’t for immigration? Maybe. And for many these “maybe’s” and “perhaps” is enough. And I sort of get it; it’s always easy to blame someone, even easier to blame someone with a foreign name with another religion. What I want you all to realize is that the problems that comes with immigration isn’t firstly and foremost immigrants that are to be blamed for, politicians are.
The individual should always be blamed and punished for the offence and crime he or she commits, but the foundation for many of the crimes we see and the creation of the basic animosity lies with the elitist righteous groups that rule us.
Ask yourself this; would your government take a view opposing yours and silence you, and those who would speak for you, and refuse to countenance any debate at all that would let you have a say? Would your government use lies and deceit to override anything you might want to do or say? Would your government use the law against you, demonise and punish you, encourage others to treat you as subhuman, for no other reason than they just don't like you?
Do you smoke? Drink? Drive? Are you a little on the portly side?
Can you see why the SD support is growing? It's not because people are all suddenly racist, it's not even because people are all suddenly in tune with all the policies on all the other things because they're pretty much the same policies as all the rest of them. The only real difference between SD and the social democrats is the more focus on the immigration and refugees issues.
People have seen the way the government are working on SD and they are thinking about that while they shiver outside for a smoke, while they queue in those bars for a overtaxed drink that comes with warning labels, while they hear talk about speed cameras that don't flash so you don't know whether you're fined until the letter arrives. They are reading about fat people beaten up for being fat, they are watching the information campaigns sending hateful messages against smokers, they are consoling children scared to death by the drowning puppies of the global warming religion, they are wondering why their government thinks they are all pedophiles, they are wondering why the government needs to poke around their computer and read their emails, and they are wondering why government and the elite tries to hide that a certain percentage of immigrants commits crime.
People aren't looking at the treatment of the SD and thinking 'They could do that to me'.
They are thinking 'They have done that to me'.
The elitists tell us that the SD are evil racists. Well, they've already told me I am personally evil because I use tobacco. I'm even more evil because I like a drink. I'm yet more evil because my salt and fat intake is nowhere near the recommended amounts. I'm a crazed 'global warming denier'. I will not take any vaccine. I promote capitalism and personal freedom and I, oh gosh, don’t vote. Can you find a more evil person than me?
Looking at the list of things this government calls me evil for being and doing, Satan had better watch out for his job. So when they call SD evil, I'm supposed to consider that a different type of evil or something?
I'm not going to vote SD. Too socialist, too controlling, too much as the rest of the bunch. But I'm not the only one classed as Satan's heir. There are millions out there who have been demonised far more than me. Why would they vote SD?
Why would they not?
And immigration is a problem, and it will continue to be a problem unless we take a different approach.
One thing that immediately would get rid of most animosity from inbreeds towards immigrants and diminish the laziness of all within a country, is to eliminate all kinds of welfare. If we also scrap minimum wage laws and take away all hinders that stops people from taking work and stops people from being a real part of society, then immigration stops being a problem.
Who the fuck cares if a doctor speaks English or Swedish? Just fix me up and cure me. And why the hell would anyone care if the engineer that builds the bridge is from India? Just make a good bridge damn you.
Finally we need to get rid of the politically correct righteous puppet masters that send their thugs and spin-doctors out to work whenever and whatever happens. I too find it ridiculous singing the national anthem and waving flags around, but at least that is ‘us’, our culture and a part of our history. If you ban that with some obscure reference to immigration, is it then such a surprise that immigrants become a target?
This old lady getting murdered is a very sad story, but it isn’t the first one, and it won’t be the last. Sometimes it will be a blond blueeyed tall thug that do the murdering, sometimes it will be a black-haired Muslim called Abdullah. The problem is that we seldom talk about and address the problem with immigration and that this can and, at least according to SD, do cause more crimes.
Sometimes it feels like the established parties and the righteous actually want a racist party to bash, they certainly do nothing to stop them and sad events like this one will further fuel their upwards going momentum.
The 23-year-old main suspect is facing charges of murder and aggravated assault, but has denied the allegations.
You never know in a case like this and I don’t have the police investigation in front of me, so there is chance the guy is innocent, although not very likely when you read about the incident in papers and watch the news.
However, he is of foreign origin and has a foreign name so whether he’s innocent or not have no real barring to the uproar in the community. And, of course, the Swedish Democrats (SD) that are the made-up “right-wing racist” party, loves this. It is a crime, it is a crime against the elderly by a very sick and cowardly person and it is a crime supposedly, and most likely, committed by an immigrant.
Some genius “expert” commentator said the other day that SD is using the martyr-card to gain support. Next he will probably declare that gravity exists or that the sun is warm. But what that “expert” and many others are missing is that it’s not SDs fault, not really. They can just sit back and relax. Just send an article to a paper or sit in the morning sofa once a week, then they can lay back and let the mainstream pundits bash them into fame and parliament.
And when a story like this brake out it’s yet another open goal.
Both the government and the opposition have solemnly declared that they will never form a coalition with the “racists” and that they will cut them out as much as possible. In the meantime journalists are competing in the game of who can trash and ridicule SD the most.
What the public see in all this, those that don't react with the auto-responder permanently cranked up to 'racist-Nazi-bigot-neanderthal-thug' every time those two letters are mentioned. People who would not have dreamed of voting SD, who might otherwise have heard little to nothing of that party, are wondering what all the fuss is about. Why is the government so scared of them? Why are they so desperate to silence this small party? What do they offer that the government doesn't?
And even more so, people that actually live in reality, in the real world where immigration and refugees actually pose a problem or at least some nuisance, those people see events like this murder as something the elite does nothing about. Sure the murderer might get caught and punished, but the next incident is just around the corner.
And so it doesn’t matter if journalists find criminals within SD, which party hasn’t criminals as members? Aren’t they all criminals? What if some article or pamphlet is riddled with holes? How many of the elitists aren’t lying to us each day? Are we supposed to care more because one party gets “caught” lying but not the other one?
Let's face it; so many people are so tired of our politicians - all of them - that they would be interested in voting for any party that the nosegoblins say they shouldn't.
The establishment might as well start printing 'Vote SD' badges ready for the next election.
This post isn't actually about the SD. So anyone currently suffering tinnitus and steam coming from their ears, chill out, have a smoke and a double brandy and relax. It is not a post in support of the SD nor is it a post attacking the SD. This is about the problem that immigration poses, what it potentially had to do with this murder and why the Swedish Democrats are gaining momentum.
Immigration means that a group of people that may look different or have a different religion are running, fleeing or just moving and might end up in your neighborhood.
The normal thing to do for these new citizens would be to learn the local language, get a job and work themselves into the society. I actually know how it is, having lived in several countries myself, it’s not always so easy. However this is seldom how it works.
To a certain degree these immigrants are to blame for being lazy idiots, but one also needs to realize that most countries have some kind of “plan” to take care of and handle the “helpless”. Often this little “plan” involves seeing all people that are not the norm as “helpless” and - of course - they need lots of welfare, support and “help” in all kinds of ways.
Never are they left alone getting the chance of trying to make it; they obviously cannot, they are “helpless”.
These “helpless” people than need to get past several obstacles on the labor market where unions and politicians have made it very hard for people to get a job. Minimum wage is one such stupidity making it much harder for the young and immigrants to get a decent job.
Many of these “helpless” people are also highly educated and have a degree in this or that. In Sweden for instance several of the crossing guards and personnel at the subway in Stockholm are former CEO’s, doctors and nurses. Not being able to get a job for what they are trained and educated for they try to earn some money within the rules.
As if it wasn’t enough being labeled “helpless” and being ignored by the labor-markets, they also, to some extent, get welfare-money and useless stupid education thingies thrown at them in addition to being driven to live among their peers out in some suburb. In other words it is not hard to see the foundation for conflicts and resentments, not mainly for the first ones arriving, they are probably just happy to have left their country/conflict or whatever, but their children ending up with the same problems and same labels will have problems. This is not an excuse for violent or lawbreaking behavior, just a fact needed to be considered into the equation.
No matter if you are Swedish, English or whatever, getting a bunch of foreign people coming to “your home country” and claiming a piece of that pie is kind of annoying. Since journalists, politicians and most economists keep claiming that there is a certain amount of money that – of course – needs to be distributed by the political system, this implies that more people living on the same pie means less all around and maybe even nil for some of the ethnic ones (horrid thought…).
The whole situation is fueled by those little things that keep bugging the hell out of even none-judgmental people; like banning the waving of the national flag or the outlawing of certain prayers or songs that might “offend” the newcomers.
In Sweden this can take absurd turns banning schoolchildren from attending church on graduation or people getting physically forced to remove the Swedish flag from their balcony. All this creates resentments and when an economic crisis, a war or something of that nature occurs; racists come out of the woodwork having a perfect little pile of animosity to dig out idiots from.
Would this old lady have been alive if it wasn’t for immigration? Perhaps. Would rape and violent crimes statistics be lower if it wasn’t for immigration? Maybe. And for many these “maybe’s” and “perhaps” is enough. And I sort of get it; it’s always easy to blame someone, even easier to blame someone with a foreign name with another religion. What I want you all to realize is that the problems that comes with immigration isn’t firstly and foremost immigrants that are to be blamed for, politicians are.
The individual should always be blamed and punished for the offence and crime he or she commits, but the foundation for many of the crimes we see and the creation of the basic animosity lies with the elitist righteous groups that rule us.
Ask yourself this; would your government take a view opposing yours and silence you, and those who would speak for you, and refuse to countenance any debate at all that would let you have a say? Would your government use lies and deceit to override anything you might want to do or say? Would your government use the law against you, demonise and punish you, encourage others to treat you as subhuman, for no other reason than they just don't like you?
Do you smoke? Drink? Drive? Are you a little on the portly side?
Can you see why the SD support is growing? It's not because people are all suddenly racist, it's not even because people are all suddenly in tune with all the policies on all the other things because they're pretty much the same policies as all the rest of them. The only real difference between SD and the social democrats is the more focus on the immigration and refugees issues.
People have seen the way the government are working on SD and they are thinking about that while they shiver outside for a smoke, while they queue in those bars for a overtaxed drink that comes with warning labels, while they hear talk about speed cameras that don't flash so you don't know whether you're fined until the letter arrives. They are reading about fat people beaten up for being fat, they are watching the information campaigns sending hateful messages against smokers, they are consoling children scared to death by the drowning puppies of the global warming religion, they are wondering why their government thinks they are all pedophiles, they are wondering why the government needs to poke around their computer and read their emails, and they are wondering why government and the elite tries to hide that a certain percentage of immigrants commits crime.
People aren't looking at the treatment of the SD and thinking 'They could do that to me'.
They are thinking 'They have done that to me'.
The elitists tell us that the SD are evil racists. Well, they've already told me I am personally evil because I use tobacco. I'm even more evil because I like a drink. I'm yet more evil because my salt and fat intake is nowhere near the recommended amounts. I'm a crazed 'global warming denier'. I will not take any vaccine. I promote capitalism and personal freedom and I, oh gosh, don’t vote. Can you find a more evil person than me?
Looking at the list of things this government calls me evil for being and doing, Satan had better watch out for his job. So when they call SD evil, I'm supposed to consider that a different type of evil or something?
I'm not going to vote SD. Too socialist, too controlling, too much as the rest of the bunch. But I'm not the only one classed as Satan's heir. There are millions out there who have been demonised far more than me. Why would they vote SD?
Why would they not?
And immigration is a problem, and it will continue to be a problem unless we take a different approach.
One thing that immediately would get rid of most animosity from inbreeds towards immigrants and diminish the laziness of all within a country, is to eliminate all kinds of welfare. If we also scrap minimum wage laws and take away all hinders that stops people from taking work and stops people from being a real part of society, then immigration stops being a problem.
Who the fuck cares if a doctor speaks English or Swedish? Just fix me up and cure me. And why the hell would anyone care if the engineer that builds the bridge is from India? Just make a good bridge damn you.
Finally we need to get rid of the politically correct righteous puppet masters that send their thugs and spin-doctors out to work whenever and whatever happens. I too find it ridiculous singing the national anthem and waving flags around, but at least that is ‘us’, our culture and a part of our history. If you ban that with some obscure reference to immigration, is it then such a surprise that immigrants become a target?
This old lady getting murdered is a very sad story, but it isn’t the first one, and it won’t be the last. Sometimes it will be a blond blueeyed tall thug that do the murdering, sometimes it will be a black-haired Muslim called Abdullah. The problem is that we seldom talk about and address the problem with immigration and that this can and, at least according to SD, do cause more crimes.
Sometimes it feels like the established parties and the righteous actually want a racist party to bash, they certainly do nothing to stop them and sad events like this one will further fuel their upwards going momentum.
Saturday, April 3, 2010
Zombie weekend
So it is Easter and single-celled organisms all around the world celebrate some voodoo practitioner that died a couple of thousands of years ago.
People with no brain activity whatsoever will get themselves spiked to one of those death symbols in wood. Others will put on some strange head-bonnets in order to bleed some while they waggle down the street.
Hundreds of millions have suffered, been plundered and died in the name of the spooky Jew that apparently also got up after death like a zombie created by the Umbrella Corporation. And this is a Jew and sect leader that hasn’t even been proven to have existed…
Even though I have a soft heart for someone that might be able to conjure up wine out of water, this hoax is very sad indeed. But it also has its entertaining parts. Like morons crying in front of a couple of splinters while some priest is sadomizing altar boys in the backroom or when people consume tons of chocolate in full-out gluttony while they are watching a movie that shows the ‘tragic’ death of the sect leader in question.
I have nothing against people believing in poltergeists or hocus pocus, that’s their problem. But the thing is that these duped suckers have had and still have a lot of power over people and countries. It is time to get rid of this ghost-story and to delete this “holyday” from the calendar so we can go to work.
And having spent the day reading about the Bible and how it was created I stumbled upon some new things I didn’t know.
Most I already knew from before, I did know about the church meeting in Nicosia 325 AD were some bishops voted what would be in and out of the bible. I also knew that many Gnostic texts and several pro women texts were left out, despite being very popular in their time.
In addition I also had an idea about why a bible was believed to be necessary – everyone else (Jews, Romans, Hindus etc.) seemed to have holy texts and a book filled with weirdness in order to keep the masses occupied is a good idea.
What I didn’t know was that several of the texts that made it into the bible have several different versions. So the bishops voting process 325 did not only left out the stuff that was not really to their liking, they also made a choice on which texts that had the best writings and made up the best storyline. Among other things there is an old text about Genesis were we are told the story from Eve’s perspective. A bunch of men in church cloths did not like this.
The church meeting in Nicosia also voted on if Jesus was divine or not. Before this year Jesus was not necessarily God in human form, most Christian people actually didn’t believe this. But from here on Jesus, God and the Holy Spirit was the same. Isn’t voting great?
Most of the bible is a magical story with some true names of people, cities or events. But how true is it and is it really the word of God?
Well if one believe that God influenced these bishops to make “the right decisions” you might still believe in this fiction. But there are some stories that contradict some “facts” in the bible like the forbidden story of Magdalene, the stories of Jesus childhood or the book of Enok. There are also some “facts” or “words” that change depending on the translation from one country or one bible to another. And then we have archeological and historical records that to a large degree disagree with the bible, and when it doesn’t we find that most (all) of the stories have been told before by other religions.
And in addition; the whole thing is absurd!
Do you really believe that some father figure is watching us and will condemn us for everything we do in our lives? Do you really believe in dividing the red sea or that some character could walk on water raised the dead? And do you really believe that some old men voting 1700 years ago did in fact collect the word of God? Then you are truly a very sad person that can be fooled into believing in anything.
People with no brain activity whatsoever will get themselves spiked to one of those death symbols in wood. Others will put on some strange head-bonnets in order to bleed some while they waggle down the street.
Hundreds of millions have suffered, been plundered and died in the name of the spooky Jew that apparently also got up after death like a zombie created by the Umbrella Corporation. And this is a Jew and sect leader that hasn’t even been proven to have existed…
The last dinner arrangement
Even though I have a soft heart for someone that might be able to conjure up wine out of water, this hoax is very sad indeed. But it also has its entertaining parts. Like morons crying in front of a couple of splinters while some priest is sadomizing altar boys in the backroom or when people consume tons of chocolate in full-out gluttony while they are watching a movie that shows the ‘tragic’ death of the sect leader in question.
I have nothing against people believing in poltergeists or hocus pocus, that’s their problem. But the thing is that these duped suckers have had and still have a lot of power over people and countries. It is time to get rid of this ghost-story and to delete this “holyday” from the calendar so we can go to work.
And having spent the day reading about the Bible and how it was created I stumbled upon some new things I didn’t know.
Most I already knew from before, I did know about the church meeting in Nicosia 325 AD were some bishops voted what would be in and out of the bible. I also knew that many Gnostic texts and several pro women texts were left out, despite being very popular in their time.
In addition I also had an idea about why a bible was believed to be necessary – everyone else (Jews, Romans, Hindus etc.) seemed to have holy texts and a book filled with weirdness in order to keep the masses occupied is a good idea.
What I didn’t know was that several of the texts that made it into the bible have several different versions. So the bishops voting process 325 did not only left out the stuff that was not really to their liking, they also made a choice on which texts that had the best writings and made up the best storyline. Among other things there is an old text about Genesis were we are told the story from Eve’s perspective. A bunch of men in church cloths did not like this.
The church meeting in Nicosia also voted on if Jesus was divine or not. Before this year Jesus was not necessarily God in human form, most Christian people actually didn’t believe this. But from here on Jesus, God and the Holy Spirit was the same. Isn’t voting great?
Most of the bible is a magical story with some true names of people, cities or events. But how true is it and is it really the word of God?
Well if one believe that God influenced these bishops to make “the right decisions” you might still believe in this fiction. But there are some stories that contradict some “facts” in the bible like the forbidden story of Magdalene, the stories of Jesus childhood or the book of Enok. There are also some “facts” or “words” that change depending on the translation from one country or one bible to another. And then we have archeological and historical records that to a large degree disagree with the bible, and when it doesn’t we find that most (all) of the stories have been told before by other religions.
And in addition; the whole thing is absurd!
Do you really believe that some father figure is watching us and will condemn us for everything we do in our lives? Do you really believe in dividing the red sea or that some character could walk on water raised the dead? And do you really believe that some old men voting 1700 years ago did in fact collect the word of God? Then you are truly a very sad person that can be fooled into believing in anything.
Saturday Sci-Fi rambling
Several science-fiction writers have remarked on the fact that the writers and fans believe, or would like to believe, that human behavior is or could be ruled by reason instead or emotion. That is also a necessary premise, but not exactly accurate, for most libertarians.
For someone being outside of the middle-school mainstream probably resulted in some clashes with "authority" and could naturally lead to a healthy skepticism of the ruling class on the political playground as well as in ‘real’ life. This sort of description fits both the nerd that is often connected to Sci-Fi and the libertarian.
And so is there a correlation between loving Science fiction and libertarianism? Are most libertarians also nerds?
I’ve been studying such discussion online and my view is pretty clear. Almost everyone I’ve ever known that loves The X-files, Firefly and Star Trek have a very clear opinion on individuality versus collectivism. They may not always be hardcore libertarians, but their political persuasion is certainly always far from socialism.
Of course there are exceptions, but to me it seems like that most libertarians have a liking towards technology, inventions, fantastic tales and futurism.
I would also like to point out that even though the perception of a story, movie, book or TV-show is in eye of the beholder, I cannot help seeing clear libertarian traits in all sci-fi adventures. Those that don’t agree I usually find is seeing libertarianism as that evil capitalist thought media and our master’s tries to tell us it is, not the actual ideology.
My favorite Sci-Fi show is Firefly. Although not as entertaining as Stargate SG1 or as ‘out there’ as Star Trek, I find this show particularly interesting both from an enjoyable and a libertarian perspective.
Although the show comes with certain faults such as claiming the pyramids was built by slaves or that “The Earth that was” cannot sustain too many humans, the show, to me, seem very realistic. Probably the most realistic Sci-Fi show to date.
Only that space battles and things that goes on out there are soundless is a fresh, and factual, approach I would like to see in more of these sorts of tales. There are no sounds in space which always annoys me when, for example, looking at Star Trek battles and every laser makes a loud and clear noise.
The show was created by writer and director Joss Whedon, who is a pure genius, although not very libertarian, at least not officially. Rather an American liberal and certainly against conservative ideals (yeah, I know, who isn’t?). And it follows the adventures of the renegade crew of Serenity, a "Firefly-class" spaceship.
According to Whedon's vision, "nothing will change in the future: technology will advance, but we will still have the same political, moral, and ethical problems as today”. I certainly can agree with that statement. Also the crew are ruffians often working outside the law (that is as unjust as today) and they battle against a government out of control trying to impose people a “controlled” environment and even taking it so far as to using chemicals to subdue any aggressive and non-compliance behavior.
People seemingly wants to be left alone and only wants the government to step in to enforce the laws, but since many laws and government intrusions takes it too far the story sort of starts with a civil war, very similar to that of the US civil war that also was about control and state independence, not slavery as the popular belief says. And many moons and groups of people rather lives in 'lawlessness' than have the government come by to control them.
The show also ignores aliens and too outrageous technological advancements, which I also find very refreshing and more true to facts.
When the captain of the ship Serenity, Malcolm (Mal) Reynolds, tells his first mate Zoe that with the ship, "[We] never have to be under the heel of nobody ever again. No matter how long the arm of the Alliance might get, we’ll just get a little further." you just feel the heartbeat of libertarianism pounding away.
I mean, just listen to this:
The series’ central theme seems to concern the ineptitude of strong central government and its tendency to oppress and stifle rather than free or secure. As Mal says, "That’s what governments are for, [to] get in a man’s way."
Operating under the precepts of free trade, Mal is a principled smuggler ; while the government places barriers on trade, Mal believes the smuggling he does is honest work. As he tells a prospective client who is apprehensive about dealing with supposedly dishonest smugglers, "Seems to me there’s nothing dishonest about getting goods to people that need ’em." That philosophy extends to mud, medical supplies, and in one delightful episode, cattle.
To top it all off we have Whedon’s trademark witty and thoughtfully chosen scripts and the language is almost as fantastic, and slightly more grown-up, than that of Buffy.
So to my fellow nerds and libertarians out there, see this show. And for you that have lefties point of view should also see it as one of many tales that pretty accurately tells us about government versus individual thinking and shows what libertarianism is for many of us that actually believe in that idea.
Finally I need to say to all of you out there that once space flight becomes a reality, let’s bring all libertarians together and fly far, far away from all the wars, inflation, unemployment and poverty the rest of this planet’s inhabitants continue to spit out.
For someone being outside of the middle-school mainstream probably resulted in some clashes with "authority" and could naturally lead to a healthy skepticism of the ruling class on the political playground as well as in ‘real’ life. This sort of description fits both the nerd that is often connected to Sci-Fi and the libertarian.
And so is there a correlation between loving Science fiction and libertarianism? Are most libertarians also nerds?
I’ve been studying such discussion online and my view is pretty clear. Almost everyone I’ve ever known that loves The X-files, Firefly and Star Trek have a very clear opinion on individuality versus collectivism. They may not always be hardcore libertarians, but their political persuasion is certainly always far from socialism.
Of course there are exceptions, but to me it seems like that most libertarians have a liking towards technology, inventions, fantastic tales and futurism.
I would also like to point out that even though the perception of a story, movie, book or TV-show is in eye of the beholder, I cannot help seeing clear libertarian traits in all sci-fi adventures. Those that don’t agree I usually find is seeing libertarianism as that evil capitalist thought media and our master’s tries to tell us it is, not the actual ideology.
My favorite Sci-Fi show is Firefly. Although not as entertaining as Stargate SG1 or as ‘out there’ as Star Trek, I find this show particularly interesting both from an enjoyable and a libertarian perspective.
Although the show comes with certain faults such as claiming the pyramids was built by slaves or that “The Earth that was” cannot sustain too many humans, the show, to me, seem very realistic. Probably the most realistic Sci-Fi show to date.
Only that space battles and things that goes on out there are soundless is a fresh, and factual, approach I would like to see in more of these sorts of tales. There are no sounds in space which always annoys me when, for example, looking at Star Trek battles and every laser makes a loud and clear noise.
The show was created by writer and director Joss Whedon, who is a pure genius, although not very libertarian, at least not officially. Rather an American liberal and certainly against conservative ideals (yeah, I know, who isn’t?). And it follows the adventures of the renegade crew of Serenity, a "Firefly-class" spaceship.
According to Whedon's vision, "nothing will change in the future: technology will advance, but we will still have the same political, moral, and ethical problems as today”. I certainly can agree with that statement. Also the crew are ruffians often working outside the law (that is as unjust as today) and they battle against a government out of control trying to impose people a “controlled” environment and even taking it so far as to using chemicals to subdue any aggressive and non-compliance behavior.
People seemingly wants to be left alone and only wants the government to step in to enforce the laws, but since many laws and government intrusions takes it too far the story sort of starts with a civil war, very similar to that of the US civil war that also was about control and state independence, not slavery as the popular belief says. And many moons and groups of people rather lives in 'lawlessness' than have the government come by to control them.
The show also ignores aliens and too outrageous technological advancements, which I also find very refreshing and more true to facts.
When the captain of the ship Serenity, Malcolm (Mal) Reynolds, tells his first mate Zoe that with the ship, "[We] never have to be under the heel of nobody ever again. No matter how long the arm of the Alliance might get, we’ll just get a little further." you just feel the heartbeat of libertarianism pounding away.
I mean, just listen to this:
The series’ central theme seems to concern the ineptitude of strong central government and its tendency to oppress and stifle rather than free or secure. As Mal says, "That’s what governments are for, [to] get in a man’s way."
Operating under the precepts of free trade, Mal is a principled smuggler ; while the government places barriers on trade, Mal believes the smuggling he does is honest work. As he tells a prospective client who is apprehensive about dealing with supposedly dishonest smugglers, "Seems to me there’s nothing dishonest about getting goods to people that need ’em." That philosophy extends to mud, medical supplies, and in one delightful episode, cattle.
To top it all off we have Whedon’s trademark witty and thoughtfully chosen scripts and the language is almost as fantastic, and slightly more grown-up, than that of Buffy.
So to my fellow nerds and libertarians out there, see this show. And for you that have lefties point of view should also see it as one of many tales that pretty accurately tells us about government versus individual thinking and shows what libertarianism is for many of us that actually believe in that idea.
Finally I need to say to all of you out there that once space flight becomes a reality, let’s bring all libertarians together and fly far, far away from all the wars, inflation, unemployment and poverty the rest of this planet’s inhabitants continue to spit out.
The Senegal fiasco
It's been almost a decade since Senegal's president swept to power with an election campaign slogan of change. Sound familiar? Anyway, Senegal's new 160-foot African renaissance monument as yet again triggered concerned over government mismanagement and nepotism and a towering, multimillion-dollar presidential indulgence.
The $27 million statue-project is that of a mighty Soviet-style bronze statue of a man, woman and child overlooks the Atlantic Ocean and dominates the horizon of the capital, Dakar. Built by North Koreans it is supposed to symbolize the triumph of African liberation from centuries of ignorance, intolerance and racism.
Senegal’s economy has collapsed, the education system is in a crisis, and the health system is in crisis. And yet the government is squandering public money on a huge monument that no-one really likes. Sound familiar?
In September last year, Senegal was awarded a $540 million grant from the United States as a reward for — and to encourage — good governance. Isn’t that special? How about it you Americans out there, feel proud over helping out paying for a statue that looks like this:
Muslims, of course, are protesting. The female is kind of half-naked, and presenting the human form as a sort of object of worship isn’t really a part of the Islamic faith. And from their point of view, you cannot really blame them. The statue is neither Islamic or becoming nor aesthetically African. I’m no art critic; I just see the waste of money and think that it can be put to better use. I don’t care if it is a statue of Muhammad riding a dog or of a palm tree. Still a waste.
But just to make things funnier, Abdoulaye Wade, the Senegal president, says he's entitled to 35 percent of any revenues generated from tourism from the monument.
This is almost too comical.
About 30 heads of state are set to attend the inauguration on today, and I cannot wait for some of those getting back home ordering their own set of statues.
The $27 million statue-project is that of a mighty Soviet-style bronze statue of a man, woman and child overlooks the Atlantic Ocean and dominates the horizon of the capital, Dakar. Built by North Koreans it is supposed to symbolize the triumph of African liberation from centuries of ignorance, intolerance and racism.
Senegal’s economy has collapsed, the education system is in a crisis, and the health system is in crisis. And yet the government is squandering public money on a huge monument that no-one really likes. Sound familiar?
In September last year, Senegal was awarded a $540 million grant from the United States as a reward for — and to encourage — good governance. Isn’t that special? How about it you Americans out there, feel proud over helping out paying for a statue that looks like this:
Muslims, of course, are protesting. The female is kind of half-naked, and presenting the human form as a sort of object of worship isn’t really a part of the Islamic faith. And from their point of view, you cannot really blame them. The statue is neither Islamic or becoming nor aesthetically African. I’m no art critic; I just see the waste of money and think that it can be put to better use. I don’t care if it is a statue of Muhammad riding a dog or of a palm tree. Still a waste.
But just to make things funnier, Abdoulaye Wade, the Senegal president, says he's entitled to 35 percent of any revenues generated from tourism from the monument.
This is almost too comical.
About 30 heads of state are set to attend the inauguration on today, and I cannot wait for some of those getting back home ordering their own set of statues.
Swedish pensioners are lucky
Income gap among Swedish pensioners has grown over the last 10 years, according to a report from Statistics Sweden.
Of course this is yelled about in media as “unfair”.
Two things here.
Firstly what is unfair about a person working harder and saving more during his/her lifetime and reek the benefits later? What it is unfair is that the gap isn’t wider.
Secondly, Swedish pensioners have their pensions covered, at least for the most part. Earlier changes in the pension system and an arrangement that makes the pension debt pretty low in comparison with other countries have seen to that. Italy, Belgium and many other EU countries have not only squandered that money, they have also borrowed on it as collateral. The pension debt in some of these countries is over 300% of GDP. This isn’t a direct problem for Sweden. However, it can become one in the near future when the mentioned countries start to default for this and other reasons.
In other words, it is time to get out of the European Union.
Of course this is yelled about in media as “unfair”.
Two things here.
Firstly what is unfair about a person working harder and saving more during his/her lifetime and reek the benefits later? What it is unfair is that the gap isn’t wider.
Secondly, Swedish pensioners have their pensions covered, at least for the most part. Earlier changes in the pension system and an arrangement that makes the pension debt pretty low in comparison with other countries have seen to that. Italy, Belgium and many other EU countries have not only squandered that money, they have also borrowed on it as collateral. The pension debt in some of these countries is over 300% of GDP. This isn’t a direct problem for Sweden. However, it can become one in the near future when the mentioned countries start to default for this and other reasons.
In other words, it is time to get out of the European Union.
Friday, April 2, 2010
The Christian scam of Easter
While the Catholic Church combats accusation thrown at their priests, who in true Swedish Minister of Justice Style, have been torturing and sexually molesting children, some people are celebrating Easter.
Why you may ask? Why do we celebrate Easter?
Well, there was this guy that was born around Dec 25th, born of a virgin that was impregnated by the Holy Ghost and his birth was followed by a star in the East. He was of royal descent. The birth was adorned by 3 kings; he became a teacher at 12, was baptised at 30 and had 12 disciples. He was called the light, and the son of God, and he performed miracles, among many walking of water. When he died he was 'crucified', dead for 3 days and then resurrected.
This is of course the Egyptian ‘Sun’/sky-God Horus.
We also use the pagan sign of a cross waved around just as many other religions and astrologists was doing long before any supposed son of a carpenter walked among men.
You see the Christian religion, just as most religions, are build upon other religions that came before. Almost the entire Old Testament is stolen directly from the Sumerians and Babylon. For example the Noa Story that can be found in many stories among the tribes and cultures that existed before, and the totally fictional Moses tale (of which there is no historical or archeological evidence for) that is stolen from the Sargon-myth mixed in with Misos of Egypt who carried stone tablets with the word of God around.
Most of the symbolism, items mentioned and stories about Jesus are stolen from Egypt mythology. Or, in some cases, from Persian, Roman or Greek fairy tales.
Even the 10 commandments are taken from Egypt’s Book of the Dead. Other interesting things that most likely comes from Egypt is; Baptism, afterlife, crucifixion, Great flood, Easter, Passover, virgin birth and much, much more.
This isn’t a secret, even religious people admits that there are many similarities. This is either explained by convenient way of adapting to pagan religions in order to convert them into the “correct” religion or the claim is that God have worked his way up through the ages trying to rely the message but only with Jesus and the Christian church things actually got right.
Some also claim that there are no similarities between Jesus and Horus saying that there’s no proof of Horus being born by a virgin. Such claims are nonsense, we know such stories from Egyptian mythology and it is just idiotic to ignore it.
And if Christianity, which is the bloodiest and most oppressive religion of all time, is the correct religion you just gotto throw a lot of profanities at God.
But even this bloodlust has its explanations from devotees of the plagiarized Jesus figure. Their religion was hijacked by evil men or Satan (another stolen entity from other religions). This I find particularly funny since most of the evil stuff being done in the name of God can be found in the bible. A bible that didn’t exist before circa 325AD just as Jesus wasn’t regarded as the son of God and part of the holy trinity before that date. You know what happen then don’t you? Well, some bishops and priests came together and VOTED on those issues.
Religion in general is a fraud; and Christianity in particular is a horrible scam. Probably the second biggest scam of all time, after the totally mad idea of Manmade Global warming.
Maybe you’re supposed to respect religions, but I don’t. I can respect individuals and their faith as their conviction, but that doesn’t mean they are less stupid. People who follow the mythological figure of Jesus are morons; plain and simple.
Why you may ask? Why do we celebrate Easter?
Well, there was this guy that was born around Dec 25th, born of a virgin that was impregnated by the Holy Ghost and his birth was followed by a star in the East. He was of royal descent. The birth was adorned by 3 kings; he became a teacher at 12, was baptised at 30 and had 12 disciples. He was called the light, and the son of God, and he performed miracles, among many walking of water. When he died he was 'crucified', dead for 3 days and then resurrected.
This is of course the Egyptian ‘Sun’/sky-God Horus.
We also use the pagan sign of a cross waved around just as many other religions and astrologists was doing long before any supposed son of a carpenter walked among men.
You see the Christian religion, just as most religions, are build upon other religions that came before. Almost the entire Old Testament is stolen directly from the Sumerians and Babylon. For example the Noa Story that can be found in many stories among the tribes and cultures that existed before, and the totally fictional Moses tale (of which there is no historical or archeological evidence for) that is stolen from the Sargon-myth mixed in with Misos of Egypt who carried stone tablets with the word of God around.
Most of the symbolism, items mentioned and stories about Jesus are stolen from Egypt mythology. Or, in some cases, from Persian, Roman or Greek fairy tales.
Even the 10 commandments are taken from Egypt’s Book of the Dead. Other interesting things that most likely comes from Egypt is; Baptism, afterlife, crucifixion, Great flood, Easter, Passover, virgin birth and much, much more.
This isn’t a secret, even religious people admits that there are many similarities. This is either explained by convenient way of adapting to pagan religions in order to convert them into the “correct” religion or the claim is that God have worked his way up through the ages trying to rely the message but only with Jesus and the Christian church things actually got right.
Some also claim that there are no similarities between Jesus and Horus saying that there’s no proof of Horus being born by a virgin. Such claims are nonsense, we know such stories from Egyptian mythology and it is just idiotic to ignore it.
And if Christianity, which is the bloodiest and most oppressive religion of all time, is the correct religion you just gotto throw a lot of profanities at God.
But even this bloodlust has its explanations from devotees of the plagiarized Jesus figure. Their religion was hijacked by evil men or Satan (another stolen entity from other religions). This I find particularly funny since most of the evil stuff being done in the name of God can be found in the bible. A bible that didn’t exist before circa 325AD just as Jesus wasn’t regarded as the son of God and part of the holy trinity before that date. You know what happen then don’t you? Well, some bishops and priests came together and VOTED on those issues.
Religion in general is a fraud; and Christianity in particular is a horrible scam. Probably the second biggest scam of all time, after the totally mad idea of Manmade Global warming.
Maybe you’re supposed to respect religions, but I don’t. I can respect individuals and their faith as their conviction, but that doesn’t mean they are less stupid. People who follow the mythological figure of Jesus are morons; plain and simple.
Frozen Arctic vodka mon ami. And make it a double!
For the first time since 2001, Arctic Sea ice will hit the “normal” line as defined by the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) for this time of year. So March brought good news for the Polar Bears - a species that has been steadily growing for four decades. Instead of ice extent declining through March like it usually does, it continued to increase through the month and is now at the high (so far) for the year.
Me, I think it is highly stupid defining something ever changing that has been free from Ice several times and has had lots of more Ice than today as having a “normal” amount of ice. However, that’s how the paid for by big oil at NSIDC is seeing it…
But for me this is kind of strange actually. Contrary to popular belief when most of the world gets hotter, the Ice sheet in the arctics grows, not the other way around. This has to do with clouds, water vapor, and the normal state of affairs of this planet.
We’ve just had the coldest winter in the northern hemisphere in over a century and the Ice grows? I don’t know what real climatologists say about that one, but one thing is for sure, media will not pick up the story, not dooming and glooming enough.
The Bering Sea ice will melt this summer, it happens every year and has for millennia. Nothing strange about it, the winds and the summer warmth do it, but that will decrease the ice sheets during the summer and that will make the news, not this little report.
I find it very interesting that Mother Nature is screwing up this little icy theory of manmade climate change, as she usually does.
Remember how the members of the Church of Climatology were freezing their socks of last year during the Fraudenhagen talks? Or do you remember how the NOAA tried to call a press conference in Washington recently? The conference was supposed to be about “earlier snowmelt and extended ice-free seasons”, but it had to be postponed because of the heaviest snowfall in decades…
And now, just as Scientists in the US have presented one of the most dramatic forecasts yet for the disappearance of Arctic sea ice, then the Arctic is growing. Professor Wieslaw Maslowski told an American Geophysical Union meeting the other day that previous projections had underestimated the processes now driving ice loss claiming that by 2013 Arctic summers would be ice-free.
Being kind of intoxicated I feel the need to point out that right now I could probably come up with a story like this, but it is much better when the Earth and its normal functions do it for me.
I feel this crap is getting boring. Even regular people out there is starting to see through this scam, I don’t even need to get people drunk anymore before they want to slaughter some white bears.
Al Gore and the rest can probably still make millions (billions) out of this so they will continue to perpetrate the hoax for a while yet at the same time as governments impose more restrictions and taxes that never will be lifted - not even when even the mainstream pundits have left the asylum.
So the biggest scam in human history will continue for a couple of years more. Thank the lord of all that is unholy for the invention of vodka. How else could we sane survive?
Me, I think it is highly stupid defining something ever changing that has been free from Ice several times and has had lots of more Ice than today as having a “normal” amount of ice. However, that’s how the paid for by big oil at NSIDC is seeing it…
But for me this is kind of strange actually. Contrary to popular belief when most of the world gets hotter, the Ice sheet in the arctics grows, not the other way around. This has to do with clouds, water vapor, and the normal state of affairs of this planet.
We’ve just had the coldest winter in the northern hemisphere in over a century and the Ice grows? I don’t know what real climatologists say about that one, but one thing is for sure, media will not pick up the story, not dooming and glooming enough.
The Bering Sea ice will melt this summer, it happens every year and has for millennia. Nothing strange about it, the winds and the summer warmth do it, but that will decrease the ice sheets during the summer and that will make the news, not this little report.
I find it very interesting that Mother Nature is screwing up this little icy theory of manmade climate change, as she usually does.
Remember how the members of the Church of Climatology were freezing their socks of last year during the Fraudenhagen talks? Or do you remember how the NOAA tried to call a press conference in Washington recently? The conference was supposed to be about “earlier snowmelt and extended ice-free seasons”, but it had to be postponed because of the heaviest snowfall in decades…
And now, just as Scientists in the US have presented one of the most dramatic forecasts yet for the disappearance of Arctic sea ice, then the Arctic is growing. Professor Wieslaw Maslowski told an American Geophysical Union meeting the other day that previous projections had underestimated the processes now driving ice loss claiming that by 2013 Arctic summers would be ice-free.
Being kind of intoxicated I feel the need to point out that right now I could probably come up with a story like this, but it is much better when the Earth and its normal functions do it for me.
I feel this crap is getting boring. Even regular people out there is starting to see through this scam, I don’t even need to get people drunk anymore before they want to slaughter some white bears.
Al Gore and the rest can probably still make millions (billions) out of this so they will continue to perpetrate the hoax for a while yet at the same time as governments impose more restrictions and taxes that never will be lifted - not even when even the mainstream pundits have left the asylum.
So the biggest scam in human history will continue for a couple of years more. Thank the lord of all that is unholy for the invention of vodka. How else could we sane survive?
The Savior
Getting drunk
I still have vodka that is calling out to me, will spend the rest of the day/night making friends with that bottle…
The US swindle continues
According to US Labor Department the American economy added 162,000 jobs in March, the biggest burst of hiring in three years. Of course this is “great news” to Wall Street that continues to add fake ‘value’ to the stock exchange. Media is applauding and the Pick-pocket in Chief is probably celebrating.
However, this, as almost everything being told lately, is a scam.
162,000 jobs they say eh?
Well, we can immediately withdraw the census workers at 48,000. Most prediction were a lot higher than that but we can assume that the 50,000 or so of these knuckleheads wasting tax dollars knocking on doors that are missing here will pop up next month…
162,000-48,000= 114,000
In reality these census types take their salary from the productive sector (taxes stolen from actual jobs) so they should be counted double, or, since they are mostly part time at least 50% i.e. 24,000 more. But let’s ignore that. The figures are horrific anyway so we can be generous.
Then we have the Birth-Death model that has added an additional 84,000 phantom jobs. This model isn’t easy to grasp. I need to admit, I don’t get it and I read about and check these things daily. It can be accurate, but it never has been before so many of those “jobs” most likely don’t exist, but let’s say many do (we are very generous today!). A reasonable assumption is probably that at least 34,000 of those don’t exist.
114,000-34,000= 80,000
But the figures show other Temporary help services added 40,000 jobs in March. Since September 2009, temporary help services employment has risen by 313,000. This is usually temporary positions hired by government to do some medial task or part-time jobs soon to be gone. (And again people that get their salaries from taxes for the most part...)
80,000-40,000= 40,000
The US work force consists of about 154 million and has a $15 trillion economy that apparently generated 40,000 new jobs. Wow…
There are 15+ million Americans out of work, roughly double the total before the recession began in December 2007. More Americans entered the work force last month, which prevented the increase in jobs from reducing the unemployment rate. Still at 9.7%.
However - and here comes the first fun part - according to the same government figures more Americans said they were working part-time even though they preferred full-time work. When they and discouraged workers who have given up searching for jobs are included, the "underemployment" rate ticked up to 16.9 percent from 16.8 percent.
Aha, so unemployment is actually going up? Oh, but wait, it gets better.
The number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks and over) in-creased by 414,000 over the month to 6.5 million. So not only is unemployment going up, those out of work for a long period of time are increasing in numbers.
Did you see that in any newspaper!?
Also, the average work week increased to 34 hours from 33.9, could be a positive sign. Most employers are likely to work current employees longer before they hire new workers. But…
…average hourly earnings fell by two cents to $22.47. That shows that high unemployment is enabling companies to hold down wages.
So people are working longer for less pay? So where those positive upwards going shopping figures come from? Well, funny enough, people are out borrowing money again from banks that are already insolvent. Isn’t that special?
But the picture isn’t complete until you understand two things. Firstly, these are government produced numbers. Independent sources point to much worse numbers.
Secondly, do you know what the American government will do next week? They will sell $82 billion in debt. This at the same time as 10 Year Tresury yields surged again. One year ago they were 2.77%. Today they are 3.92%. That is a 41% increase. Thank God there is no inflation...
Yes, okay, this isn’t as bad as it has been, but ‘good news’? Come on.
I would actually, looking at long term unemployment and the actual unemployment figures say this is bad news, but that you will not find in any news reporting.
However, this, as almost everything being told lately, is a scam.
162,000 jobs they say eh?
Well, we can immediately withdraw the census workers at 48,000. Most prediction were a lot higher than that but we can assume that the 50,000 or so of these knuckleheads wasting tax dollars knocking on doors that are missing here will pop up next month…
162,000-48,000= 114,000
In reality these census types take their salary from the productive sector (taxes stolen from actual jobs) so they should be counted double, or, since they are mostly part time at least 50% i.e. 24,000 more. But let’s ignore that. The figures are horrific anyway so we can be generous.
Then we have the Birth-Death model that has added an additional 84,000 phantom jobs. This model isn’t easy to grasp. I need to admit, I don’t get it and I read about and check these things daily. It can be accurate, but it never has been before so many of those “jobs” most likely don’t exist, but let’s say many do (we are very generous today!). A reasonable assumption is probably that at least 34,000 of those don’t exist.
114,000-34,000= 80,000
But the figures show other Temporary help services added 40,000 jobs in March. Since September 2009, temporary help services employment has risen by 313,000. This is usually temporary positions hired by government to do some medial task or part-time jobs soon to be gone. (And again people that get their salaries from taxes for the most part...)
80,000-40,000= 40,000
The US work force consists of about 154 million and has a $15 trillion economy that apparently generated 40,000 new jobs. Wow…
There are 15+ million Americans out of work, roughly double the total before the recession began in December 2007. More Americans entered the work force last month, which prevented the increase in jobs from reducing the unemployment rate. Still at 9.7%.
However - and here comes the first fun part - according to the same government figures more Americans said they were working part-time even though they preferred full-time work. When they and discouraged workers who have given up searching for jobs are included, the "underemployment" rate ticked up to 16.9 percent from 16.8 percent.
Aha, so unemployment is actually going up? Oh, but wait, it gets better.
The number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks and over) in-creased by 414,000 over the month to 6.5 million. So not only is unemployment going up, those out of work for a long period of time are increasing in numbers.
Did you see that in any newspaper!?
Also, the average work week increased to 34 hours from 33.9, could be a positive sign. Most employers are likely to work current employees longer before they hire new workers. But…
…average hourly earnings fell by two cents to $22.47. That shows that high unemployment is enabling companies to hold down wages.
So people are working longer for less pay? So where those positive upwards going shopping figures come from? Well, funny enough, people are out borrowing money again from banks that are already insolvent. Isn’t that special?
But the picture isn’t complete until you understand two things. Firstly, these are government produced numbers. Independent sources point to much worse numbers.
Secondly, do you know what the American government will do next week? They will sell $82 billion in debt. This at the same time as 10 Year Tresury yields surged again. One year ago they were 2.77%. Today they are 3.92%. That is a 41% increase. Thank God there is no inflation...
Yes, okay, this isn’t as bad as it has been, but ‘good news’? Come on.
I would actually, looking at long term unemployment and the actual unemployment figures say this is bad news, but that you will not find in any news reporting.
Thursday, April 1, 2010
Waterboarding Easter fun!
A soldier waterboarded his four-year-old daughter because she was unable to recite her alphabet.
Joshua Tabor admitted to police he had used the CIA torture technique because he was so angry.
As his daughter 'squirmed' to get away, Tabor said he submerged her face three or four times until the water was lapping around her forehead and jawline.
Tabor, 27, who had won custody of his daughter only four weeks earlier, admitted choosing the punishment because the girl was terrified of water.
There you go, a wonderful new way of punishing children. I do hope the Minister of Justice in Sweden read this; she’ll get another idea on how to torture our young. Strapping adolescents down and taking their blood, urine and doing other marvelous tests against the child’s and the child’s parents will is great fun, but waterboarding would be better.
And if course we today learn that the US is imposing even harder restrictions for inbound travelers. Everyone going to America is now going to be screened as a potential terrorist threat.
I’ve been wondering for some time if I could visit the land of corporatism and home of the serfs. Being a libertarian, consorting with “right-wing” people and bashing the Obamination should render one or two flags. It is tornado season and I was thinking of visiting a pal in Texas to check some twisters out...
Joshua Tabor admitted to police he had used the CIA torture technique because he was so angry.
As his daughter 'squirmed' to get away, Tabor said he submerged her face three or four times until the water was lapping around her forehead and jawline.
Tabor, 27, who had won custody of his daughter only four weeks earlier, admitted choosing the punishment because the girl was terrified of water.
There you go, a wonderful new way of punishing children. I do hope the Minister of Justice in Sweden read this; she’ll get another idea on how to torture our young. Strapping adolescents down and taking their blood, urine and doing other marvelous tests against the child’s and the child’s parents will is great fun, but waterboarding would be better.
And if course we today learn that the US is imposing even harder restrictions for inbound travelers. Everyone going to America is now going to be screened as a potential terrorist threat.
I’ve been wondering for some time if I could visit the land of corporatism and home of the serfs. Being a libertarian, consorting with “right-wing” people and bashing the Obamination should render one or two flags. It is tornado season and I was thinking of visiting a pal in Texas to check some twisters out...
More incidents that didn’t happen
As I’ve said a couple of times now No-one in Sweden has a gun cos they are outlawed. We all know that if you outlaw something then criminals will always listen, right?
So when you read about two people getting gunned down in the middle of the town of Södertälje yesterday, it didn’t really happen.
And the two driving around in a Car that got shot, it was an illusion…
There are shootings in Sweden every single day. EVERY DAY!
Most of the time it is criminals shooting at other criminals, but not always. Families do get destroyed, homes wrecked and fear spreads.
And fear is what government wants. If we feel afraid we want government to protect us. The more afraid we are, the more laws, the more police and the more the war on crimes becomes everyone’s business.
They want us afraid and defenseless in addition to being outgunned and outnumbered. This is how they rule and this is why we don’t have gun-rights.
Isn’t it time for criminals to feel fear instead of us? Shouldn’t a rapist be wondering whether or not you’re carrying a gun? Wouldn’t it be better if government thought twice before imposing a law against an armed populace instead of doing whatever they want?
So when you read about two people getting gunned down in the middle of the town of Södertälje yesterday, it didn’t really happen.
And the two driving around in a Car that got shot, it was an illusion…
There are shootings in Sweden every single day. EVERY DAY!
Most of the time it is criminals shooting at other criminals, but not always. Families do get destroyed, homes wrecked and fear spreads.
And fear is what government wants. If we feel afraid we want government to protect us. The more afraid we are, the more laws, the more police and the more the war on crimes becomes everyone’s business.
They want us afraid and defenseless in addition to being outgunned and outnumbered. This is how they rule and this is why we don’t have gun-rights.
Isn’t it time for criminals to feel fear instead of us? Shouldn’t a rapist be wondering whether or not you’re carrying a gun? Wouldn’t it be better if government thought twice before imposing a law against an armed populace instead of doing whatever they want?
Which home is likely to get robbed?
How interesting it is
I wrote a year or so ago about the Obama Youth camps and how the president is taking advantage of his predecessors enactment reinforcement of The Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education (GIVE) Act. Expanding it from 75,000 volunteers to at least 250,000. The bill also would increase education funding and establish a summer service program for students. Basically it is about wearing a uniform, have military-like education and learn how to handle crisis such as natural disasters.
To this they’ve proposed a universal civilian service for every young American. Under this plan, All Americans between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five will be asked to serve their country by going through three months of basic training, civil defense preparation and community service.
The United States leadership also wants to enlist its 3.4 million Girl Scouts in the effort to combat hurricanes, pandemics, terror attacks and other disasters. I do guess that the main idea is to have these pedocatchers helping out with debris, helping the sick, distribute food and such, but is a hurricane stricken area or fighting terrorism really the sort of place and work for young girls?
Sure, I know what you’re thinking, this is sort of a tin-foil hat explanation and you could argue that Americans have a different way of helping out in their communities then most European have. But, that doesn’t make the potential of several hundreds of thousands of trained youths with guns under the authority of Washington less scary.
And now this:
Add in the fact that habeas corpus is gone and that 380,000 regular troops have been deployed on US soil recently and it isn’t hard seeing the same thing as militia groups and conspiracy nuts see.
I do think that most of this comes with good intentions, but we all know where that paved road leads…
To this they’ve proposed a universal civilian service for every young American. Under this plan, All Americans between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five will be asked to serve their country by going through three months of basic training, civil defense preparation and community service.
The United States leadership also wants to enlist its 3.4 million Girl Scouts in the effort to combat hurricanes, pandemics, terror attacks and other disasters. I do guess that the main idea is to have these pedocatchers helping out with debris, helping the sick, distribute food and such, but is a hurricane stricken area or fighting terrorism really the sort of place and work for young girls?
Sure, I know what you’re thinking, this is sort of a tin-foil hat explanation and you could argue that Americans have a different way of helping out in their communities then most European have. But, that doesn’t make the potential of several hundreds of thousands of trained youths with guns under the authority of Washington less scary.
And now this:
Add in the fact that habeas corpus is gone and that 380,000 regular troops have been deployed on US soil recently and it isn’t hard seeing the same thing as militia groups and conspiracy nuts see.
I do think that most of this comes with good intentions, but we all know where that paved road leads…
A fortress of Solitude needed
A year after the adoption of Sweden's fascist IPRED legislation, new figures show that file sharing is growing in popularity, internet traffic has rebounded strongly, and only a small handful of cases have been brought before the autocrats courts.
The introduction of the law, aimed at tackling file sharing by slaughtering personal privacy, strangely enough coincided with the high profile convictions of the four backers of the Pirate Bay.
On a similar note, ‘illegal’ streaming has also become more popular with a recent report from internet company Cisco confirming the rise of the technology as it eliminates the need for users to download copyrighted files and run the risk of prosecution.
Of course this is yet another failure of our masters and they will certainly not let this stand. We cannot wait for ACTA and the European Union to make its presence known. In particular the low amount of court cases and not a single prisoner as of yet are an abomination to the powers that be.
I would be very, very surprised if news like this doesn’t lead to an IPRED part IV –back with a vengeance. And that streaming thingy need to be stopped now, a new law perhaps? To no surprised it has also been suggested that Sweden need a new Spy-law in order to easier bring spies to justice and convict them. Seem unrelated doesn’t it? Yeah… sure…
Maybe harsher penalties and more money to certain agencies is the way to go? Certainly, but legislators will look to amend the law(s) and further deteriorate our civil liberties firstly. Stealing our money to hand it over to thugs that is supposed to monitor and find incriminating evidence against us is the icing of the cake, not the real point. The ever present threat towards and the intimidation of the public is the main priority.
Me, I am still looking for that place of tranquility far away from authorities and government spies roaming my computer.
Lately I’ve been thinking about Antarctica and setting up a colony in the middle of nowhere out on the ice. Space flight is too far away into the future and no Aliens will come and save us. Looking around the globe there’s really no place to hide. There are still deep jungles and the Ocean depths might do, but wouldn’t it be fun with setting up some tents on the South Pole?
The introduction of the law, aimed at tackling file sharing by slaughtering personal privacy, strangely enough coincided with the high profile convictions of the four backers of the Pirate Bay.
On a similar note, ‘illegal’ streaming has also become more popular with a recent report from internet company Cisco confirming the rise of the technology as it eliminates the need for users to download copyrighted files and run the risk of prosecution.
Of course this is yet another failure of our masters and they will certainly not let this stand. We cannot wait for ACTA and the European Union to make its presence known. In particular the low amount of court cases and not a single prisoner as of yet are an abomination to the powers that be.
I would be very, very surprised if news like this doesn’t lead to an IPRED part IV –back with a vengeance. And that streaming thingy need to be stopped now, a new law perhaps? To no surprised it has also been suggested that Sweden need a new Spy-law in order to easier bring spies to justice and convict them. Seem unrelated doesn’t it? Yeah… sure…
Maybe harsher penalties and more money to certain agencies is the way to go? Certainly, but legislators will look to amend the law(s) and further deteriorate our civil liberties firstly. Stealing our money to hand it over to thugs that is supposed to monitor and find incriminating evidence against us is the icing of the cake, not the real point. The ever present threat towards and the intimidation of the public is the main priority.
Me, I am still looking for that place of tranquility far away from authorities and government spies roaming my computer.
Lately I’ve been thinking about Antarctica and setting up a colony in the middle of nowhere out on the ice. Space flight is too far away into the future and no Aliens will come and save us. Looking around the globe there’s really no place to hide. There are still deep jungles and the Ocean depths might do, but wouldn’t it be fun with setting up some tents on the South Pole?
A home for the future?
The autocrats are at it again
Trying to cure my hangover and just passing time in front of my laptop I’ve been trying to determine what stories are fictional April fools gags and what stories are real.
Not easy I can tell you.
Will UN create a new department in order to limit online surfing? It is very likely. We’ve already heard about how they regard computers as energy devouring monsters. Also UN has many countries and people of totalitarian persuasion, many capable of unspeakable evil and bent on world domination.
So why wouldn’t such a story be true?
Health experts have called for a sugar tax as Swedes remain the highest global consumers of sweets, 30,000 - 60,000 children are so obese that they risk a premature death as a result of diabetes, cancer and heart attacks, some ‘researchers’ argue. And so they call to dramatically increase tax on sugary foodstuffs in order to curb high consumption.
This kind of “we know best” idiocy seems to be spitted out from asylums now and again. And this story is, sadly, most likely true.
What I am wondering is; what about imported candy? Will that be illegal soon? Will there be jail time for suger-smuggling? How about home grown suger? Will suger producers become hunted like drug cartels and terrorists soon? Maybe the US can invade Cuba on those premises? Probably get the UN on their side on that one. Trying to protect the world from evil suger communists seem like a very righteous cause, don’t you think?
We’re told what to eat, drink, smoke, think, do, drive, and work and millions of other things. All the time they are throwing ads at us, government health campaigns pour out every week, and it is all paid for by you.
They are so concerned for us that they need to steal our money and use it to tell us what to do, and if we don’t comply they will use more stolen money from us to punish us.
We live so insignificant lives on a little blue dot in the corner of one galaxy among billions. Our time of existence is so small that in the grand scheme of things that we’ve hardly existed at all. But during the fraction of time we live we’re constantly bullied around by ‘thinkers’, politicians and know-it-all righteous thugs.
Is a life under the thumb of these people really worth living? If they take away those comforts and joys that we have and deem them unhealthy, dangerous and slap anyone not obeying, what’s the point?
Drugs are fun, alcohol is great, tobacco brings joy, and we all love suger and fast food. To travel around the world bungy jumping, sleeping with a lot of people, drinking yourself senseless while nibbling on a hamburger and having a cigarette in your hand, that’s what I call living. So what if that increases your chance of getting cancer by 20% or if you gain a few pounds, at least you’ve lived.
I am fully aware that not all people want this or regard this as “life”. Some just want to be ‘healthy’, jogging each day only eating salad. Others want that normal family life, living in the suburb with a station wagon and two kids. Some scale mountains, others go to work with doctors without borders.
The interesting thing is that at any moment you can be dead. No matter who you are or were you live, you will die and it can be tomorrow. A truck can run you over, you can trip in the shower, a brain aneurism can strike while you’re sitting on the toilet, a madman can shoot you, a foreign power can attack with bombs or the lightening can hit you.
We’re mortals, we will die, and many of us will die long before it is ‘our time’.
Are restrictions, bans and hinders like taxation really the way to have a good life? And even if you or some researchers think so, why choose the same for all others? Isn’t each person’s own life more worth then being controlled by faceless bureaucrats?
Not easy I can tell you.
Will UN create a new department in order to limit online surfing? It is very likely. We’ve already heard about how they regard computers as energy devouring monsters. Also UN has many countries and people of totalitarian persuasion, many capable of unspeakable evil and bent on world domination.
So why wouldn’t such a story be true?
Health experts have called for a sugar tax as Swedes remain the highest global consumers of sweets, 30,000 - 60,000 children are so obese that they risk a premature death as a result of diabetes, cancer and heart attacks, some ‘researchers’ argue. And so they call to dramatically increase tax on sugary foodstuffs in order to curb high consumption.
This kind of “we know best” idiocy seems to be spitted out from asylums now and again. And this story is, sadly, most likely true.
What I am wondering is; what about imported candy? Will that be illegal soon? Will there be jail time for suger-smuggling? How about home grown suger? Will suger producers become hunted like drug cartels and terrorists soon? Maybe the US can invade Cuba on those premises? Probably get the UN on their side on that one. Trying to protect the world from evil suger communists seem like a very righteous cause, don’t you think?
We’re told what to eat, drink, smoke, think, do, drive, and work and millions of other things. All the time they are throwing ads at us, government health campaigns pour out every week, and it is all paid for by you.
They are so concerned for us that they need to steal our money and use it to tell us what to do, and if we don’t comply they will use more stolen money from us to punish us.
We live so insignificant lives on a little blue dot in the corner of one galaxy among billions. Our time of existence is so small that in the grand scheme of things that we’ve hardly existed at all. But during the fraction of time we live we’re constantly bullied around by ‘thinkers’, politicians and know-it-all righteous thugs.
Is a life under the thumb of these people really worth living? If they take away those comforts and joys that we have and deem them unhealthy, dangerous and slap anyone not obeying, what’s the point?
Drugs are fun, alcohol is great, tobacco brings joy, and we all love suger and fast food. To travel around the world bungy jumping, sleeping with a lot of people, drinking yourself senseless while nibbling on a hamburger and having a cigarette in your hand, that’s what I call living. So what if that increases your chance of getting cancer by 20% or if you gain a few pounds, at least you’ve lived.
I am fully aware that not all people want this or regard this as “life”. Some just want to be ‘healthy’, jogging each day only eating salad. Others want that normal family life, living in the suburb with a station wagon and two kids. Some scale mountains, others go to work with doctors without borders.
The interesting thing is that at any moment you can be dead. No matter who you are or were you live, you will die and it can be tomorrow. A truck can run you over, you can trip in the shower, a brain aneurism can strike while you’re sitting on the toilet, a madman can shoot you, a foreign power can attack with bombs or the lightening can hit you.
We’re mortals, we will die, and many of us will die long before it is ‘our time’.
Are restrictions, bans and hinders like taxation really the way to have a good life? And even if you or some researchers think so, why choose the same for all others? Isn’t each person’s own life more worth then being controlled by faceless bureaucrats?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)