A plane carrying Polish President Lech Kaczynski has crashed. Mr Kaczynski was on board along with his wife Maria and several senior government figures including the army chief of staff Gen Franciszek Gagor, central bank governor Slawomir Skrzypek and deputy Foreign Minister Andrzej Kremer.
They were in Russia to mark the 70th anniversary of the Katyn massacre, when the communists killed thousands of Poles. One of hundreds of massacres and mass graves littering the Russian landscape curtsey of socialist policies.
So a president (and Eurosceptic) seriously disliked by Russian authorities is together with the army chief and other dignitaries on his way to commemorate lots of dead Poles by the hands of leftie Russians, they flew a Russian plane (Tupolev 154) and they end up being crispy corpses themselves on Russian soil…
So it is not unlikely that conspiracists will be watching this right now cooking up some plot about shape shifting relatives of the British Queen psychically channeling the Spirit of Stalin to bring down the plane to start WW III.
However there are no indications so far of foul play, just an ironic demise of many of the top wigs in Polish politics, which of course will cause some serious internal Polish problems and probably won’t do any good for the financial markets when they open on Monday. Another story like this during the weekend adding to the Greeks getting sucked into a black hole of despair and we’ll see a market crash next week.
I’ll be watching this closely with popcorn and some polish vodka…
Friday, April 9, 2010
Ready for a reality check?
For those of you who can handle a goodly dose of reality, you might be interested in what Alan Watt has to say:
6th April:
7th April:
8th April:
Visit Alan Watt's site for the documentation that backs up his arguments. You might want to purchase his wares once you're there. What I've seen so far is excellent.
6th April:
7th April:
8th April:
Visit Alan Watt's site for the documentation that backs up his arguments. You might want to purchase his wares once you're there. What I've seen so far is excellent.
The death of Greece – the Euro to follow?
Anyone following the news ticking in about our olive-oiled friends down by the Aegean are either laughing or crying today. I am, of course, laughing. Remember, today is Friday, this is significant for market manipulators. I wonder what they will say during the weekend…
I will let the people over at ZeroHedge explain:
If this information is correct, it is all over. Bloomberg calculates the yield on the Greek 3 Month as determined by the bid, or where investors are willing to buy it, based on BVAL sources at 21.3%. In all honesty the bid/offer market in the 3 Month are all over the place. HDAT gives it as 99.650x99.840, BVAL is at 99.470x99.773. The HDAT bid implies a yield of 14.049%, which is still game over for Greece.
Greece plans to sell €600 million in 6 Month and €600 million in 12 Month Bills on April 13. Sorry, if the 3M is anywhere close to 14% bid (let alone 21%), this is not happening.
The Market Ticker thinks that:
Greece needs to pull out of the Euro now and take the hit. There is a point beyond which the spiral tightens beyond all reason, and they may already be into the vortex too far to do anything meaningful, but this much is certain – the longer they delay the worse it’s going to get.
I am not so sure about that myself. Defaulting, setting up their own currency and jumping ship may actually, at least in the short run, be much, much worse. Their best bet, from Greece’s point of view, is still to rely on the Eurozone to come and rescue them.
However, such a move is contingent on Germany actually allowing it to happen. And even IF that is the case, what about the ramifications? Can they break their own laws and bail out an entire country?
And IF they do we have Italy, Spain, Portugal and possibly Ireland waiting in the wings for their bailouts. In effect, bailing out Greece would be the coup de grâce of the Euro.
What? ‘IMF’ you say? Well, good luck with that one…
And don't come saying "no-one told you so", I did, many did. We've been saying it for years. Time to start paying attention soon?
I will let the people over at ZeroHedge explain:
If this information is correct, it is all over. Bloomberg calculates the yield on the Greek 3 Month as determined by the bid, or where investors are willing to buy it, based on BVAL sources at 21.3%. In all honesty the bid/offer market in the 3 Month are all over the place. HDAT gives it as 99.650x99.840, BVAL is at 99.470x99.773. The HDAT bid implies a yield of 14.049%, which is still game over for Greece.
Greece plans to sell €600 million in 6 Month and €600 million in 12 Month Bills on April 13. Sorry, if the 3M is anywhere close to 14% bid (let alone 21%), this is not happening.
The Market Ticker thinks that:
Greece needs to pull out of the Euro now and take the hit. There is a point beyond which the spiral tightens beyond all reason, and they may already be into the vortex too far to do anything meaningful, but this much is certain – the longer they delay the worse it’s going to get.
I am not so sure about that myself. Defaulting, setting up their own currency and jumping ship may actually, at least in the short run, be much, much worse. Their best bet, from Greece’s point of view, is still to rely on the Eurozone to come and rescue them.
However, such a move is contingent on Germany actually allowing it to happen. And even IF that is the case, what about the ramifications? Can they break their own laws and bail out an entire country?
And IF they do we have Italy, Spain, Portugal and possibly Ireland waiting in the wings for their bailouts. In effect, bailing out Greece would be the coup de grâce of the Euro.
What? ‘IMF’ you say? Well, good luck with that one…
And don't come saying "no-one told you so", I did, many did. We've been saying it for years. Time to start paying attention soon?
Now put on the music and shake it baby
Internet a breeding ground for extremists?
I’ve said it before; the anti-internet campaigning is just getting started. Apparently some Swedish journalists have figured out that racists and the ‘extreme right’ is very strong and growing online.
So horrible.
On the other side of the pond this has been argued by Democrats and liberals for a long time. And since Ron Paul gather many of his supporters on the internet, the ‘conservatives’ are tagging along. Cannot have contradictory views out there now can we?
Me, I hardly notice ‘extremists’ at all, from any side, well despite myself and lots of other libertarians that are “extreme right” (in one sense) so we’re very likely to get bunched together with KKK members and skinheads. Easier to discard sensible humanists and peace loving citizens looking out for the little guy if all such individuals are labeled ‘racist’...
It is likely I’ve stumbled upon one or two blogs when checking stories, but as far as I can tell the racists and what the mainstream journalists call ‘ultra right’ are very hard to find. And those that you can find are terrible writers with low or no intellect.
Basically a ‘extreme right’ blog copy and paste a certain news story and then they write one or two sentences with amoeba-like qualities like; “If we just kill all the negroes, everything would be fine”.
According to certain journalists this makes them very dangerous and apparently they can grow their numbers this way.
Really?
If that really is the case, which I seriously doubt, people in general are even more stupid than even I thought.
The story also goes that commentator’s on papers and such online are to a large degree hiding behind pseudonyms in order to spread their hatred.
This I do, to a small extent, agree with. Visiting a commentator field you can always find one Marxist saying we should kill all directors, one racist that believes that Auschwitz is a made-up fictional tale, and some youngster hiding behind the screen writing obnoxious stuff for the fun of it.
Most of the people writing are however ordinary folks showing their anger or correcting journalists that are more than often wrong.
The problem here is that a normal guy saying that immigrants are “getting away with murder” is bunched together with the racist one. Also every time someone complains over problems with refugees or that immigrants committing too many crimes or that Shari’a laws are an abomination, are also ‘racists’.
This is of course a lie, and a deliberate one at that.
Are people getting pissed that some immigrant comes to their country, spits on the laws, lives on welfare and murders some defenseless pensioner? Nooo? How can that be?
This is the sort of ‘thinking’ that have given momentum to racism in the first place.
Our masters only have two ways of dealing with racists.
The first, and most common one, is to basically ignore them. Cut them out. Refuse to take in any publication, ideas, exhibits or lecturers that might be dangerous ‘ultra rightists’. And if any such thing appears then in step the stone throwing hippies and fascist anarchists that are just as bad, or worse, to knock the racists out. Seldom condemned by the mainstream media (with the occasional “bad little leftie” automatic response as the exception) they can take streets, destroy property and burn cars and it is all for a good cause – to get rid of ‘right-wing extremists’.
This first way isn’t working, never has and never will. This because it make people sympathetic to the racists cause, because they get bullied by the elitists and their underlings and consequently get martyrdom. But also because some of the issues raised by them are actually true, partly or fully. There are problems with immigrations, there are problems with refugees, there are crashes of cultures and there are fanatics within certain immigration groups that are just as dangerous as any racist.
Just because racists are stupid enough to think that knocking off some Jew or shooting some Muslims will solve the problem, doesn’t mean that the actual underlying problem isn’t there.
The second way of dealing with racism is probably even more stupid then the first one. This is the ‘word-game’, and this anti-internet thingy is an example of that. Anything and anyone not compliant with the mainstream politically correct view is an example of racism.
Want to enforce the law on immigrants? Racism. Want to stop immigration for a while so the ones already here can settle before we take in more? Racism. Want to celebrate in church? Racism. Wave the American/British/Swedish flag? Racism. Singing the national anthem on graduation? Racism. Say you hate Muslim fanatics? Racism. If you don’t like Jewish atrocities in Gaza? Racism.
And if you’re not racist, you’re “ultra right” and/or an extremist that makes Hitler look peaceful.
Getting Godwin’ed is a way of life for most of us, and this on a daily basis.
Under the surface ordinary, peaceful, law-abiding citizens see the problems that are ignored and the animosity grows. In affect this actually creates “racists”, not suppress them as the intention is.
The powers that be are mostly just ignorant fools; they don’t understand that they actually are the ones creating the problems. Firstly by making immigrants unemployed, forcing them to live in ghettoes and pity them along with tons of welfare checks. Secondly by this anti-racist politically correct righteous crap that fuels the problem.
But there’s also another side to it. You see immigrants are to a large degree dependent on government, so they will vote for governments that give them stuff. In essence immigrants are voting cattle, mostly for the lefties.
As a libertarian I am for open borders. I see no problem whatsoever in people moving in or out. I don’t care if people around me are blacks, Hispanic or Muslims.
Why would I?
What I do care about however is that people obey the law and shouldn’t get any preferential treatment. Move or flee wherever you want, but do it on your own accord. From me you would get no welfare checks, not a single government job, no language courses and in exchange I demand that you obey the law, do what you can to fit in and learn the language on your own.
You can dance the cha-cha, play the dreidel song or go around mumbling Allah Akbar all day if you want, just don’t expect me to change my life or adjust to your ways. If you come to my country, you’re mine and my countrymen’s guest and I aspect you to act accordingly.
I’ve lived in four countries so far and I have never expected anything else from myself and as far as I can tell most immigrants coming to a foreign country have the same state of mind. But then in steps government...
As usual government and the righteous elitists are creating and worsening the problems, if you really want to eliminate racism; eliminate those groups.
So horrible.
On the other side of the pond this has been argued by Democrats and liberals for a long time. And since Ron Paul gather many of his supporters on the internet, the ‘conservatives’ are tagging along. Cannot have contradictory views out there now can we?
Me, I hardly notice ‘extremists’ at all, from any side, well despite myself and lots of other libertarians that are “extreme right” (in one sense) so we’re very likely to get bunched together with KKK members and skinheads. Easier to discard sensible humanists and peace loving citizens looking out for the little guy if all such individuals are labeled ‘racist’...
It is likely I’ve stumbled upon one or two blogs when checking stories, but as far as I can tell the racists and what the mainstream journalists call ‘ultra right’ are very hard to find. And those that you can find are terrible writers with low or no intellect.
Basically a ‘extreme right’ blog copy and paste a certain news story and then they write one or two sentences with amoeba-like qualities like; “If we just kill all the negroes, everything would be fine”.
According to certain journalists this makes them very dangerous and apparently they can grow their numbers this way.
Really?
If that really is the case, which I seriously doubt, people in general are even more stupid than even I thought.
The story also goes that commentator’s on papers and such online are to a large degree hiding behind pseudonyms in order to spread their hatred.
This I do, to a small extent, agree with. Visiting a commentator field you can always find one Marxist saying we should kill all directors, one racist that believes that Auschwitz is a made-up fictional tale, and some youngster hiding behind the screen writing obnoxious stuff for the fun of it.
Most of the people writing are however ordinary folks showing their anger or correcting journalists that are more than often wrong.
The problem here is that a normal guy saying that immigrants are “getting away with murder” is bunched together with the racist one. Also every time someone complains over problems with refugees or that immigrants committing too many crimes or that Shari’a laws are an abomination, are also ‘racists’.
This is of course a lie, and a deliberate one at that.
Are people getting pissed that some immigrant comes to their country, spits on the laws, lives on welfare and murders some defenseless pensioner? Nooo? How can that be?
This is the sort of ‘thinking’ that have given momentum to racism in the first place.
Our masters only have two ways of dealing with racists.
The first, and most common one, is to basically ignore them. Cut them out. Refuse to take in any publication, ideas, exhibits or lecturers that might be dangerous ‘ultra rightists’. And if any such thing appears then in step the stone throwing hippies and fascist anarchists that are just as bad, or worse, to knock the racists out. Seldom condemned by the mainstream media (with the occasional “bad little leftie” automatic response as the exception) they can take streets, destroy property and burn cars and it is all for a good cause – to get rid of ‘right-wing extremists’.
This first way isn’t working, never has and never will. This because it make people sympathetic to the racists cause, because they get bullied by the elitists and their underlings and consequently get martyrdom. But also because some of the issues raised by them are actually true, partly or fully. There are problems with immigrations, there are problems with refugees, there are crashes of cultures and there are fanatics within certain immigration groups that are just as dangerous as any racist.
Just because racists are stupid enough to think that knocking off some Jew or shooting some Muslims will solve the problem, doesn’t mean that the actual underlying problem isn’t there.
The second way of dealing with racism is probably even more stupid then the first one. This is the ‘word-game’, and this anti-internet thingy is an example of that. Anything and anyone not compliant with the mainstream politically correct view is an example of racism.
Want to enforce the law on immigrants? Racism. Want to stop immigration for a while so the ones already here can settle before we take in more? Racism. Want to celebrate in church? Racism. Wave the American/British/Swedish flag? Racism. Singing the national anthem on graduation? Racism. Say you hate Muslim fanatics? Racism. If you don’t like Jewish atrocities in Gaza? Racism.
And if you’re not racist, you’re “ultra right” and/or an extremist that makes Hitler look peaceful.
Getting Godwin’ed is a way of life for most of us, and this on a daily basis.
Under the surface ordinary, peaceful, law-abiding citizens see the problems that are ignored and the animosity grows. In affect this actually creates “racists”, not suppress them as the intention is.
The powers that be are mostly just ignorant fools; they don’t understand that they actually are the ones creating the problems. Firstly by making immigrants unemployed, forcing them to live in ghettoes and pity them along with tons of welfare checks. Secondly by this anti-racist politically correct righteous crap that fuels the problem.
But there’s also another side to it. You see immigrants are to a large degree dependent on government, so they will vote for governments that give them stuff. In essence immigrants are voting cattle, mostly for the lefties.
As a libertarian I am for open borders. I see no problem whatsoever in people moving in or out. I don’t care if people around me are blacks, Hispanic or Muslims.
Why would I?
What I do care about however is that people obey the law and shouldn’t get any preferential treatment. Move or flee wherever you want, but do it on your own accord. From me you would get no welfare checks, not a single government job, no language courses and in exchange I demand that you obey the law, do what you can to fit in and learn the language on your own.
You can dance the cha-cha, play the dreidel song or go around mumbling Allah Akbar all day if you want, just don’t expect me to change my life or adjust to your ways. If you come to my country, you’re mine and my countrymen’s guest and I aspect you to act accordingly.
I’ve lived in four countries so far and I have never expected anything else from myself and as far as I can tell most immigrants coming to a foreign country have the same state of mind. But then in steps government...
As usual government and the righteous elitists are creating and worsening the problems, if you really want to eliminate racism; eliminate those groups.
Had a job interview today…
Some people shouldn’t interview others for jobs. They should let HR people or someone that actually know what they are doing handle it. Not like this…
You are fluent in Swedish?
Yes, I am, being Swedish and all…
So you speak and write Swedish on a native level?
Uh? Yes, I am Swedish and have worked for Swedish companies and with Swedish costumers.
So you would say your Swedish is proficient to handle costumers?
Yes…
Have you worked with Swedish or Nordic Costumers before?
... Happily there are no ways of strangling someone over the phone…
You are fluent in Swedish?
Yes, I am, being Swedish and all…
So you speak and write Swedish on a native level?
Uh? Yes, I am Swedish and have worked for Swedish companies and with Swedish costumers.
So you would say your Swedish is proficient to handle costumers?
Yes…
Have you worked with Swedish or Nordic Costumers before?
... Happily there are no ways of strangling someone over the phone…
Thursday, April 8, 2010
Oh my God, the death gas will get us!
"My CO2 level is too high!"
A study has shown that near-death experiences, “such as seeing life flash before one’s eyes” or “intense feelings of joy and peace”, may be linked to levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) or, as it will be known from now on – the death gas.
The researchers believe that CO2 may alter the chemical balance of the brain and trick it into seeing lights, tunnels or dead people…
The study was carried out by Dr Zalika Klemenc-Ketis and colleagues from the University of Maribor in Slovenia. It is unclear who funded the research, but suspects include the Illuminati and Iraqi insurgents. The study was published online in the peer-reviewed medical journal Critical Care.
To my astonishment the UN have so far been silent, no doubt more careful with trusting ‘scientists’ after all the ‘gates we’ve seen lately.
But this is huge! Come on! Here you have a gas that in best case scenario causes hallucinations, in worst can be responsible for people dying in the first place. And this is the same gas that is melting polar caps, killing white bears, causes hurricanes and wildfires, gives us acne, creates poverty and possibly murdered Michael Jackson.
There should be an uproar over at the UN with pseudo intellectuals too busy counting the potential billions in new funding to even notice how their gold implanted desks are filling up with drool.
And where are the ones screaming about the chiiildreeen? CO2 is clearly a drug of sort, and still legal! I bet you can even buy it online!
War crimes and a firing range
Survivor of a US war crime
WikiLeaks, probably soon to be upgraded from an enemy of US to ‘terrorist organization’, have released more details about one of the warcrimes committed.
You can now see pictures of the children the US military fired upon when their parents tried to rescue wounded.
This news and similar events (remember the Paktia incident? The tossing of the live rabbit-thingy or how they are destroying property just for the fun of it?) are still hardly mentioned in US media. If the American people want to uphold some dignity these mercenary military thugs should stand trial, preferably in Haag.
However, to no surprise, US mercenaries are not the only ones having fun on the expense of Muslims. British soldiers are training to blast Mosques.
Well, I could make long lists of terrible offences committed in Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan. But the important thing to remember here is that the wars themselves, the foundation and reasons for them, are highly questionable in the first place. And the second thing to remember is that with somewhere around 1 million dead Muslims and another couple of millions turned into refugees, and with hardly any positive things coming out of the deal so far, there will be consequences.
I expect a chemical attack on London, a nuclear explosion in New York or something of the sort in the near future. And this time around it is hard, very hard, not to see that as a fair payback for the atrocities.
The sad thing about that is that such retaliation will lead to further escalation, maybe an attack on Iran. And then we can start saying hello to many more wars with many more millions dead.
Don’t you just love government?
Insano"R"us
It is apparent that whenever authorities are promising jobs, benefits and welfare, a socialist never feels the government is doing enough, never. There are always more jobs to be created, more benefits to be handed out and more welfare checks to be written.
When I hear politicians say such things I see taxes going up, I see regulations increasing and productivity going down. Maybe a few citizens can, very temporarily, gain something, but the government can never do anything without first take the money it needs. Very often, almost always, government steals it from the very same people that after the circle-around-thingy get some (not all) of that money back. This is the fact the socialist never acknowledge. '
The strange thing is that when a government cut expenditure and lower taxation I still see the exact same thing, only in reverse. A leftie however see their income, or women’s income, or the poor’s income go down but not how it is going up on the other side. In effect, in the mind of the socialist, if we lower taxes it takes money away from those that needs it (welfare) and then it just goes poff.
Well, of course some rich white folks in suits will feast on some of that money that actually belonged to the ones that government gave it to after stolen it from the same people it gave it to.
This is probably the strangest part of the socialist agenda and then I do not mean the policy itself, no, that is obviously taken directly from the asylum; I mean that people in general, the voters, actually believe in it.
It’s not even a magic trick where you look at one hand while the other does something. Here it is in the open. We know they steal that money from us so they can hand it back to us. We know they take our purchasing power away in order to increase it for us. We know they take our money so they can fly in private jets and live in lavish mansions while telling us what to do. It’s not a secret, but somehow it works. Somehow this socialist mind game holds true for almost every human on the planet.
Socialists themselves have through drugs, electric shocks, alien abductions or pure lunacy convinced themselves that this is how the world works. And then people vote for them.
Very strange.
"I, the almighty politician have a magical tree on which it grows wealth, vote for me and I hand you some of that wealth. All I expect in return is to rule over your lives.
If someone comes along and say he will take that free wealth away from you it will vanish forever. Mwa ha ha…"
Are people really that dumb? Well, yes they are George, and if you open door number three you’ll find a nice free oven to make cookies in.
Wanna get high?
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
Soon they are coming after you!
The Obama Administration has taken the unprecedented step of authorising the killing of a US citizen, the radical Muslim cleric Anwar al-Awlaki.
Assassinating a citizen without a trial? Wow, this guy must be a terrible man and there is tons of evidence that make it okay to kill him… right?
“Al-Awlaki is a proven threat,” one US official said. “He’s been targeted.”
Proven threat eh? So what did he do, did he slaughter lots of children while videotaping it? Is he a smoker?
He gained prominence after it emerged that he had been in frequent e-mail contact with Major Nidal Malik Hasan, the army psychiatrist who went on a shooting rampage in Fort Hood, Texas, in which 13 people died last November. After the Christmas Day airliner plot, US and Yemeni officials said that Mr al-Awlaki had met the suspected bomber, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, who tried to ignite explosives sewn into his underwear.
Ohoh… he had frequent e-mail contact with one man and then he had met yet another man. Interesting, but surely there’s more?
Mr al-Awlaki is believed to be hiding in Yemen, the supposed new home of al-Qaeda.
Okay…. So? Where is the evidence? What makes this guy so dangerous that he’s up for assassination?
The decision is extraordinary not only because Mr al-Awlaki is believed to be the first American whose killing has been approved by a US President, but also because the Obama Administration chose to make the move public.
We could assume there is more evidence we’re not being told about, but why not incorporate that in the official story? They are already warning the guy of impending death, so what if they say that they have DNA, fingerprints or witnesses?
Instead we’re being told that if you send emails to the wrong man, happened to bump into another man and move to the wrong place you can get killed, whenever, without a trial, by your own government.
So it makes it kind of strange outing such a murder, but not really...
This move that was made here was not the move to order the capture or killing of this guy. They were going to do that anyway. The real move that was made here was to make this public.
…you see not so long ago Militia groups, libertarians and folks with Ron Paul bumper stickers were deemed to be a threat to national security. An obscure government report it was, but nevertheless one in a long line of similar ideas seemingly setting root in Washington. And have you seen what they call the Tea Party people?
Yes, interesting times…
The end is closing in for Greece
There are two posts over at ZeroHedge you should read. Now.
Firstly:
Actually, with the 3 month trading at a mindblowing 4%+, which we are fairly confident is a record for any country, let alone a EU and EMU member, one can claim that the country will not see July in its current political form.
And then:
And so the Greek funding crisis shifts to a liquidity crisis yet again. Bankingnews.gr reports that Commerzbank, among many others, is now pulling its repos with Greek banks, essentially killing liquidity in the entire financial system.
To summarize the collapse is near. The questions needed to be answered now are; will the Germans continue to fight the bail-out? Will the Eurozone members throw billions into the Greek fire to postpone the olive-oily crash for another year or so? Will the IMF step in with their scams and trickery? How long before there’s a revolt just as in Thailand and Kyrgyzstan?
But the really important questions are what come next. Will Italy follow Greece this year or next? Is Spain about to go down? How long does the Portuguese fiasco last?
I can tell you this, when one of these bigger failures (Portugal withstanding) start to crumble and rumble, then all the rest will follow and then it is just a race to the bottom. And I don’t mean just for Europe…
Firstly:
Actually, with the 3 month trading at a mindblowing 4%+, which we are fairly confident is a record for any country, let alone a EU and EMU member, one can claim that the country will not see July in its current political form.
And then:
And so the Greek funding crisis shifts to a liquidity crisis yet again. Bankingnews.gr reports that Commerzbank, among many others, is now pulling its repos with Greek banks, essentially killing liquidity in the entire financial system.
To summarize the collapse is near. The questions needed to be answered now are; will the Germans continue to fight the bail-out? Will the Eurozone members throw billions into the Greek fire to postpone the olive-oily crash for another year or so? Will the IMF step in with their scams and trickery? How long before there’s a revolt just as in Thailand and Kyrgyzstan?
But the really important questions are what come next. Will Italy follow Greece this year or next? Is Spain about to go down? How long does the Portuguese fiasco last?
I can tell you this, when one of these bigger failures (Portugal withstanding) start to crumble and rumble, then all the rest will follow and then it is just a race to the bottom. And I don’t mean just for Europe…
This, ladies and gentlemen, is how empires die
There are few places in the world that can be so connected with so many falls of empires as Afghanistan. Afghanistan has been deemed to be "the graveyard of empires." and this for a very good reason.
The only army that can be claimed to have “succeeded” to a certain degree was the one lead by Alexander the Great (327-325 B.C.). Alexander solved his conquest quandaries by applying a combination of annihilating military action whenever possible with a process of planting communities of Greek colonists in Afghanistan. In other words kill all and everyone and then move in on the place where the dead lived with people more reasonable.
Pretty much everyone else has failed miserably.
The Red Army withdrew in defeat in 1989; the USSR suffered high casualties which caused societal problems; and Moscow’s Afghan war sped the bleeding of the already dying Soviet economy. The British tried it before that and before them it was the Mughal Empire and many others.
Today we have a force of approximately 80,000 troops constituting the U.S.-led coalition. These are supposed to be an adequate force for the assigned multi-task of keeping Karzai in power and spreading democracy; creating nationwide law and order; training Kabul’s military, security, and police services; building an economy and transportation/communication infrastructure virtually from scratch; defeating al-Qaeda; eliminating the Taleban; and neutralizing the world’s most potent heroin-growers and narcotics traffickers; protect the Afghani/Pakistani border; lay the groundwork’s for oil pipelines and protect them, and much more.
Does anyone else see the stupidity here?
I can only see two possible reasons for the continuing failure and inescapable strategic and eventual moral DEFEAT of this coalition. Either the US military and its allies are so inapt and so clueless that it boggles the mind how they even manage to do anything. Or they don’t want to ‘win’.
There is no way around it; those are the only two options.
Superior airpower, massive technology and weapons advantage, trillions of dollars and the 80,000 strong (*chuckle*) coalition have managed to gain control of the Afghan cities—which each foreign invader of Afghanistan since 300 BCE has easily won—while allowing the Taleban, al-Qaeda, and their allies to flee to the Afghan mountains, Pakistan, and elsewhere to prepare to fight another day.
They should have gone all in from the start – if they wanted to win that is.
There is only one way to fight a war. You commit your nation's resources - material and the most precious of all, human - to the complete obliteration of your enemy. You mass those resources against each objective in turn, without reservation, without holding back, without care for collateral damage or world opinion. You do so until your adversary sues for peace, not because it is the political thing to do, not for expedience, but for one and only one reason: they're tired of dying. There is no "armistice" or "cease fire" in a war. There is only victory or defeat. There is only death or life.
This they didn’t do, for whatever reason. I think it is a combination of utter stupidity and the less ambitious goal of controlling the pipeline and the immediate area with enemies still there to fight. I don’t think they want to win because if they won, their enemies would be gone and there would be no reason to have troops there anymore. How can they protect their interests, keep the circle around Iran intact and have that elusive enemy to rally the American people against if they win?
And for each day that passes, with body bags arriving home to all countries supporting this scam, with new war crimes committed by US soldiers going psycho and no real victories claimed, the unavoidable withdraw with their tails between their legs comes closer and closer.
8 years they’ve been there now, and what have they to show for it except for thousands of murdered families and a so so control of the cities?
Well, the drug trade flourishes like never before, probably fueling CIA’s pockets.
That pipeline is getting build, so that’s something, temporarily at least. An extremely large anti-American movement growing all over the world, even pro-American people like myself are almost hoping ‘terrorists’ attack the US again.
Sorry, but I need to say this to you US citizens out there, you’re starting to deserve it.
And this is, for me, probably the worst thing about this. US forces and the American establishment have alienated hundreds of millions of people that is now starting to look at Western democracy, ‘capitalism’ and consumerism as the very essence of evil. These people didn’t hate American freedom and way of life before, but they are certainly starting to do so now.
There have been so many scandals; so many crimes against humanity, war crimes and total disrespect of all things the US say they stand for that it will be almost impossible to rebuild any good reputation ever again. Most Americans doesn’t seem to understand this. Partially because the American media fail to report and dig into the stories.
America is not only losing this war they are also losing credibility and support all across the world. And this they do at the same time as they are throwing trillions of dollars into their devouring war machine, running enormous deficits, crushing their communications with air restrictions, internet laws and mad government schemes. US have a growing very uneasy population back home and a looming depression at the horizon.
This, ladies and gentlemen, is how empires die!
The only army that can be claimed to have “succeeded” to a certain degree was the one lead by Alexander the Great (327-325 B.C.). Alexander solved his conquest quandaries by applying a combination of annihilating military action whenever possible with a process of planting communities of Greek colonists in Afghanistan. In other words kill all and everyone and then move in on the place where the dead lived with people more reasonable.
Pretty much everyone else has failed miserably.
The Red Army withdrew in defeat in 1989; the USSR suffered high casualties which caused societal problems; and Moscow’s Afghan war sped the bleeding of the already dying Soviet economy. The British tried it before that and before them it was the Mughal Empire and many others.
Today we have a force of approximately 80,000 troops constituting the U.S.-led coalition. These are supposed to be an adequate force for the assigned multi-task of keeping Karzai in power and spreading democracy; creating nationwide law and order; training Kabul’s military, security, and police services; building an economy and transportation/communication infrastructure virtually from scratch; defeating al-Qaeda; eliminating the Taleban; and neutralizing the world’s most potent heroin-growers and narcotics traffickers; protect the Afghani/Pakistani border; lay the groundwork’s for oil pipelines and protect them, and much more.
Does anyone else see the stupidity here?
I can only see two possible reasons for the continuing failure and inescapable strategic and eventual moral DEFEAT of this coalition. Either the US military and its allies are so inapt and so clueless that it boggles the mind how they even manage to do anything. Or they don’t want to ‘win’.
There is no way around it; those are the only two options.
Superior airpower, massive technology and weapons advantage, trillions of dollars and the 80,000 strong (*chuckle*) coalition have managed to gain control of the Afghan cities—which each foreign invader of Afghanistan since 300 BCE has easily won—while allowing the Taleban, al-Qaeda, and their allies to flee to the Afghan mountains, Pakistan, and elsewhere to prepare to fight another day.
They should have gone all in from the start – if they wanted to win that is.
There is only one way to fight a war. You commit your nation's resources - material and the most precious of all, human - to the complete obliteration of your enemy. You mass those resources against each objective in turn, without reservation, without holding back, without care for collateral damage or world opinion. You do so until your adversary sues for peace, not because it is the political thing to do, not for expedience, but for one and only one reason: they're tired of dying. There is no "armistice" or "cease fire" in a war. There is only victory or defeat. There is only death or life.
This they didn’t do, for whatever reason. I think it is a combination of utter stupidity and the less ambitious goal of controlling the pipeline and the immediate area with enemies still there to fight. I don’t think they want to win because if they won, their enemies would be gone and there would be no reason to have troops there anymore. How can they protect their interests, keep the circle around Iran intact and have that elusive enemy to rally the American people against if they win?
And for each day that passes, with body bags arriving home to all countries supporting this scam, with new war crimes committed by US soldiers going psycho and no real victories claimed, the unavoidable withdraw with their tails between their legs comes closer and closer.
8 years they’ve been there now, and what have they to show for it except for thousands of murdered families and a so so control of the cities?
Well, the drug trade flourishes like never before, probably fueling CIA’s pockets.
That pipeline is getting build, so that’s something, temporarily at least. An extremely large anti-American movement growing all over the world, even pro-American people like myself are almost hoping ‘terrorists’ attack the US again.
Sorry, but I need to say this to you US citizens out there, you’re starting to deserve it.
And this is, for me, probably the worst thing about this. US forces and the American establishment have alienated hundreds of millions of people that is now starting to look at Western democracy, ‘capitalism’ and consumerism as the very essence of evil. These people didn’t hate American freedom and way of life before, but they are certainly starting to do so now.
There have been so many scandals; so many crimes against humanity, war crimes and total disrespect of all things the US say they stand for that it will be almost impossible to rebuild any good reputation ever again. Most Americans doesn’t seem to understand this. Partially because the American media fail to report and dig into the stories.
America is not only losing this war they are also losing credibility and support all across the world. And this they do at the same time as they are throwing trillions of dollars into their devouring war machine, running enormous deficits, crushing their communications with air restrictions, internet laws and mad government schemes. US have a growing very uneasy population back home and a looming depression at the horizon.
This, ladies and gentlemen, is how empires die!
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
A choice between Labour and Labour
I cannot help seeing tons of similarities between Swedish and British politics. During the last Swedish general election the supposed “right-wing” party Moderaterna (Tories’ equivalent) took several steps to the left, changed their rhetoric to better suit the common man and adopted several ideas and sentences regularly used by the Social Democrats (Labour).
Even before the similarities between the supposed left and the supposed right was minimal, after that election and during this period the similarities have been even more obvious.
The inbreed devotees will of course not agree. According to the politicos there’s a huuuuuge distinction.
A 1-2% difference in taxation, one or two laws among thousands and one department less or more is what they are fighting over nowadays, but listening to spin-doctors and those closest to power the very future of the world is at stake.
What is even more distressful then the slim differences, what is really worrisome are the parts were they are in agreement. Both sides want to be member of the European Union and are happily licking boots in Brussels. Both sides want that totalitarian control-grid and CCTV everywhere. Both sides pray at the Church of Climatology. Both sides want to save the chiiildreeen and hug feminists. Both sides love Keynesian economics and have no problems throwing billions at banks and selling out our future while their serfs stumble further down into despair.
As said, the similarities with Britain are staggering.
The Tories doesn’t want to change anything, and the current Labour government is probably the worst government in the history of mankind and wants to go further down the same path.
Listening to the British debate and political discussion I cannot see any reason voting for Cameron versus voting for the cyclops. The scot is horrendously ugly and probably evil incarnate, but seen to the policies a vote for either is a wasted vote.
Or, if in doubt, check this clip out:
Okay, that was Tony the war criminal and Cameron, but you get the idea…
Even worse than that, whoever takes power are going to haft to face the worst economic disaster the British isles have faced in many centuries. There is actually only one way out of that mess and it isn’t the LabourTories way. The truth is that only the illusion of choice and democracy exist, but in reality, Brits live in a two party autocracy.
Americans can probably recognize this too, so can many people on this planet.
The mainstream statism and political correctness they have mixed with five drops of fascism, four drops of socialism and one very tiny drop of capitalism is the road pretty much everyone is on. The comparison above comes to the main ‘adversaries’ in Swedish politics are applicable everywhere.
No wonder a depression awaits us.
A leftie would probably argue that Labour/social democrats /The Democratic Party have turn towards the middle, become more ‘right’ so to say. This isn’t so. In some aspects they have abandon socialism, but instead they’ve adapted much of the collectivism that we normally call ‘fascism’.
The same can be said about the supposed conservative parties.
The initial thought from both sides was probably to win the electorate and then make more gradual changes as to not scare off voters.
The problem here is twofold.
Firstly it is much easier being to the left in politics, it appeals more to the hearts of people and the rhetoric is so simple a coma patient can do it. And since they cannot only use words, they also need to act; this means that leftie policies become the winner. Secondly by moving slightly towards the middle they have adopted corporatism as a biproduct and so fascism strikes. And the longer time this goes on and the more they suck up to the righteous and politically correct, the deeper the chasm gets.
If you want change, real change, the main parties should not be your choice, in any country. Vote communist, pick the Pirate Party, UKIP, or vote libertarian - which is what you all should do. Such parties will make a difference if gaining power. Sure the communists will kill us all more quickly, but hey, a real change.
Even before the similarities between the supposed left and the supposed right was minimal, after that election and during this period the similarities have been even more obvious.
The inbreed devotees will of course not agree. According to the politicos there’s a huuuuuge distinction.
A 1-2% difference in taxation, one or two laws among thousands and one department less or more is what they are fighting over nowadays, but listening to spin-doctors and those closest to power the very future of the world is at stake.
What is even more distressful then the slim differences, what is really worrisome are the parts were they are in agreement. Both sides want to be member of the European Union and are happily licking boots in Brussels. Both sides want that totalitarian control-grid and CCTV everywhere. Both sides pray at the Church of Climatology. Both sides want to save the chiiildreeen and hug feminists. Both sides love Keynesian economics and have no problems throwing billions at banks and selling out our future while their serfs stumble further down into despair.
As said, the similarities with Britain are staggering.
The Tories doesn’t want to change anything, and the current Labour government is probably the worst government in the history of mankind and wants to go further down the same path.
Listening to the British debate and political discussion I cannot see any reason voting for Cameron versus voting for the cyclops. The scot is horrendously ugly and probably evil incarnate, but seen to the policies a vote for either is a wasted vote.
Or, if in doubt, check this clip out:
Okay, that was Tony the war criminal and Cameron, but you get the idea…
Even worse than that, whoever takes power are going to haft to face the worst economic disaster the British isles have faced in many centuries. There is actually only one way out of that mess and it isn’t the LabourTories way. The truth is that only the illusion of choice and democracy exist, but in reality, Brits live in a two party autocracy.
Americans can probably recognize this too, so can many people on this planet.
The mainstream statism and political correctness they have mixed with five drops of fascism, four drops of socialism and one very tiny drop of capitalism is the road pretty much everyone is on. The comparison above comes to the main ‘adversaries’ in Swedish politics are applicable everywhere.
No wonder a depression awaits us.
A leftie would probably argue that Labour/social democrats /The Democratic Party have turn towards the middle, become more ‘right’ so to say. This isn’t so. In some aspects they have abandon socialism, but instead they’ve adapted much of the collectivism that we normally call ‘fascism’.
The same can be said about the supposed conservative parties.
The initial thought from both sides was probably to win the electorate and then make more gradual changes as to not scare off voters.
The problem here is twofold.
Firstly it is much easier being to the left in politics, it appeals more to the hearts of people and the rhetoric is so simple a coma patient can do it. And since they cannot only use words, they also need to act; this means that leftie policies become the winner. Secondly by moving slightly towards the middle they have adopted corporatism as a biproduct and so fascism strikes. And the longer time this goes on and the more they suck up to the righteous and politically correct, the deeper the chasm gets.
If you want change, real change, the main parties should not be your choice, in any country. Vote communist, pick the Pirate Party, UKIP, or vote libertarian - which is what you all should do. Such parties will make a difference if gaining power. Sure the communists will kill us all more quickly, but hey, a real change.
Alex Jones is worth listening to
Im not a big Alex Jones follower...But the guy do have a point.
Also read my post from earlier today on about the same thing as AJ speaks on.
Also read my post from earlier today on about the same thing as AJ speaks on.
MORE WARCRIMES!!
Following the first horrific Bagdad story exposed thanks to WikiLeaks and despite the bullying from several governments, and there are even more stories are coming out. This one is more recent and equally horrific, in a way even worse since this is face to face murders and no-one is hiding behind a screen or shooting from far away.
I would like you to go to this story:
On February 12 of this year, U.S. forces entered a village in the Paktia Province in Afghanistan and, after surrounding a home where a celebration of a new birth was taking place, shot dead two male civilians (government officials) who exited the house in order to inquire why they had been surrounded, and then shot and killed three female relatives (a pregnant mother of ten, a pregnant mother of six, and a teenager).
I have checked most of the links and the facts and they all pen out. How long are the war criminals going to allowed continuing and for how long will Sweden and other countries silently stand by and let the murders take place?
AGAIN! Notice that the old media DOES NOTHING until the scandal has been exposed...
I would like you to go to this story:
On February 12 of this year, U.S. forces entered a village in the Paktia Province in Afghanistan and, after surrounding a home where a celebration of a new birth was taking place, shot dead two male civilians (government officials) who exited the house in order to inquire why they had been surrounded, and then shot and killed three female relatives (a pregnant mother of ten, a pregnant mother of six, and a teenager).
I have checked most of the links and the facts and they all pen out. How long are the war criminals going to allowed continuing and for how long will Sweden and other countries silently stand by and let the murders take place?
AGAIN! Notice that the old media DOES NOTHING until the scandal has been exposed...
THIS IS A DOCUMENT OF A WARCRIME!
This is a partly stolen post from the head of the Pirate Party in Sweden. I thought he formulated the whole murdering incident in a really good way and wanted to share that in English.
Yesterdays big topic (with maybe the US media as exception) was the video of attack helicopters in Bagdad that WikiLeaks had decrypted and published. This video shows what authorities want to censor and control the internet. This particular video the US have gone extreme lengths to stop from airing.
The video can be found here on YouTube and show how two pilots in Bagdad see eight men calmly walking down the street. Two of them are reporters from Reuters and has cameras thrown over their backs. “Weapons, they are armed”, one pilot says when he sees this calm bunch of men walking and talking to each other. “Request permission to fire”. And then one helicopter starts to fire at the group.
Afterwards the pilots laugh and admire their progress.
However, Bagdad is seemingly not without caring people. Some people in a minivan detects that there are a lot of dead and injured people further down the street and starts to look for survivors presumably to get them to a hospital.
In the van two children are detectable.
The pilot request permission to fire again. This time at the van and the merciful helpers.
He then fires.
Then they laugh again.
A bit later when hearing there are injured children at the site the comment heard is: “Well, that’s their own damn fault for bringing kids to a battle.”
I’ve also seen some writers online saying the same thing. One of the ‘excuses’ for this atrocity. If you live in Bagdad, aren’t you supposed to have children? They were probably out shopping for food that don’t exist, driving to the blown-up school or just happened to pass by and wanted to help the wounded. Do you drive the children home first and then come back to help?
This happened back in 2007 and the American military have all along claimed that this was insurgents that opened fire at the chopper. This we now know is a deliberate lie.
THIS IS A DOCUMENT OF A WARCRIME!
You could argue that it is possible to mistake a bunch of men for enemies. But when they are calmly walking down the street talking to each other very much in the open?
And you cannot mistake the eagerness to kill and then the sheer joy of the slaughter. Do US military personnel have quotas to meet? That’s the question I ask myself. It feels like a very sick computer game with bloodthirsty drunken thugs doing the shooting.
But okay, let’s play devil’s advocate for a moment. Let’s say this first bit is an honest mistake, I hardly see how, but let’s say so. After all shit happens in wars, especially in wars that are highly questionable in the first place. This isn’t the first time reporters or innocent get killed, and it won’t be the last.
What happens after the first shooting is however in no way a mistake.
You can clearly see unarmed people trying to help wounded. You can also clearly see people moving inside the van. Maybe not so clearly that it is children (you do if you look closely), but they certainly don’t look male or armed. There’s no reason to fire, no reason at all. And clearly stated in the Geneva Convention it says that unarmed, or incapacitated and wounded, red cross personnel (or similar) should not be fired upon.
This is a war crime. On tape. That the US military and government wanted to keep secret.
Without a free internet this would never have come to your attention!
This is the kind of stuff, that together with child-pornography, would be (and are) the first things to get censured.
Survivors of child molestation rarely want censorship, this for the very same reason as the families of these murdered people. Censorship allows governments to sweep such things, and much more, under the rug. Hiding it away from scrutiny. They can then claim they have done something, and the ‘problem’ isn’t as visible anymore. But still there, now harder to get at.
A free internet makes it much tougher for governments to get away with war crimes. It makes it harder for them to get away with scandals and corruption. A free internet is required to make governments, the very same governments that want to censor internet, liable and hold accountable for corruption and cover-ups.
With this in mind is it any wonder that authorities make house calls to WikiLeaks and tries to stop them from publishing their videos and findings?
I would personally go so far to say that without a free internet, we have no democracy. This is what at stake and if you haven’t figured that out before, I hope you have now.
The people on this picture have three seconds left to live.
Yesterdays big topic (with maybe the US media as exception) was the video of attack helicopters in Bagdad that WikiLeaks had decrypted and published. This video shows what authorities want to censor and control the internet. This particular video the US have gone extreme lengths to stop from airing.
The video can be found here on YouTube and show how two pilots in Bagdad see eight men calmly walking down the street. Two of them are reporters from Reuters and has cameras thrown over their backs. “Weapons, they are armed”, one pilot says when he sees this calm bunch of men walking and talking to each other. “Request permission to fire”. And then one helicopter starts to fire at the group.
Afterwards the pilots laugh and admire their progress.
However, Bagdad is seemingly not without caring people. Some people in a minivan detects that there are a lot of dead and injured people further down the street and starts to look for survivors presumably to get them to a hospital.
In the van two children are detectable.
The pilot request permission to fire again. This time at the van and the merciful helpers.
He then fires.
Then they laugh again.
A bit later when hearing there are injured children at the site the comment heard is: “Well, that’s their own damn fault for bringing kids to a battle.”
I’ve also seen some writers online saying the same thing. One of the ‘excuses’ for this atrocity. If you live in Bagdad, aren’t you supposed to have children? They were probably out shopping for food that don’t exist, driving to the blown-up school or just happened to pass by and wanted to help the wounded. Do you drive the children home first and then come back to help?
This happened back in 2007 and the American military have all along claimed that this was insurgents that opened fire at the chopper. This we now know is a deliberate lie.
THIS IS A DOCUMENT OF A WARCRIME!
You could argue that it is possible to mistake a bunch of men for enemies. But when they are calmly walking down the street talking to each other very much in the open?
And you cannot mistake the eagerness to kill and then the sheer joy of the slaughter. Do US military personnel have quotas to meet? That’s the question I ask myself. It feels like a very sick computer game with bloodthirsty drunken thugs doing the shooting.
But okay, let’s play devil’s advocate for a moment. Let’s say this first bit is an honest mistake, I hardly see how, but let’s say so. After all shit happens in wars, especially in wars that are highly questionable in the first place. This isn’t the first time reporters or innocent get killed, and it won’t be the last.
What happens after the first shooting is however in no way a mistake.
You can clearly see unarmed people trying to help wounded. You can also clearly see people moving inside the van. Maybe not so clearly that it is children (you do if you look closely), but they certainly don’t look male or armed. There’s no reason to fire, no reason at all. And clearly stated in the Geneva Convention it says that unarmed, or incapacitated and wounded, red cross personnel (or similar) should not be fired upon.
This is a war crime. On tape. That the US military and government wanted to keep secret.
Without a free internet this would never have come to your attention!
This is the kind of stuff, that together with child-pornography, would be (and are) the first things to get censured.
Survivors of child molestation rarely want censorship, this for the very same reason as the families of these murdered people. Censorship allows governments to sweep such things, and much more, under the rug. Hiding it away from scrutiny. They can then claim they have done something, and the ‘problem’ isn’t as visible anymore. But still there, now harder to get at.
A free internet makes it much tougher for governments to get away with war crimes. It makes it harder for them to get away with scandals and corruption. A free internet is required to make governments, the very same governments that want to censor internet, liable and hold accountable for corruption and cover-ups.
With this in mind is it any wonder that authorities make house calls to WikiLeaks and tries to stop them from publishing their videos and findings?
I would personally go so far to say that without a free internet, we have no democracy. This is what at stake and if you haven’t figured that out before, I hope you have now.
Monday, April 5, 2010
The dream that died
Throughout my upbringing during the raving 80’s I had people around telling me how terrible it was to support the US. The capitalist Mecca run by a horrifying conservative actor was the very essence of immorality, corruption and greed, and so obviously I couldn’t wait to move there.
Even back then I just knew that whenever the righteous elite complained over something, whenever Swedish journalists trashed something that lefties also loathed, it just had to be one of the best things ever.
I still feel the same, but not really the same…
You see the thing I love about America isn’t the country, the people, the scenery or the supposed ‘capitalism’. And it is definitely not the reoccurring wars, war crimes and the today looming depression. What I feel in love with and still love is the idea of America, the basic foundation with the bill of rights and the constitution.
Every scrappy looking fella in the world together with outcasts, persecuted religious and political groups, criminals, starving families, the extremely poor, adventurers and ordinary folks all moved to America and they formed what I regard to be the best, the brightest and most fantastic country ever seen on the planet.
Outcompeting and out producing everyone and everything that came before or since and growing exponentially the US was the shining beacon in a world of darkness.
Nothing has frightened and upset statism loving autocrats more than the idea of America. Every king, every emperor, every pharaoh, every totalitarian thug throughout history with delusions of world domination on the backs of the people have turned in their graves from fear.
With minor local experiments aside, US of A was, in the beginning, the closest thing to capitalism and equality we have seen.
Sadly, in today’s United States, hardly anything of that remains. Only remanence. The memory. Soon hardly even that.
Many Americans seem to think they still have capitalism or that they still live in a country were the American dream flourish and that they are still the best and the brightest. To me this is a very strange notion.
US capitalism have encountered many problems and stabs but the first deathblow came 1913 with the Federal Reserve act effectively introducing inflationary policies, mad deficits and a Marxist-style central bank albeit run by a private banking cartel. Next blow came with J Edgar Hoover and his replacement Roosevelt. Not only creating much of the great depression, but worsening it and making the best out of Keynesian lunacy.
During the first couple of decades of the 20th century bill after bill passed further deteriorating what once was the land of the free. Anti-drug laws to stop Negroes from raping white women were one such stupidity. Prohibition, which lead to the rise of the mafia and an unprecedented boozing never seen or heard of before or since, was another.
With the murder of JFK and the undemocratic, yet slightly understandable, anti-communist era and then Vietnam and the abolishment of the Gold Standard yet more stabs was made against the dying corps. Despite a slight upswing in the 1980’s things has really been going to hell since the 70’s.
The Clinton administration helped build the bubble economy and created many of the entities we talk about today such as Franny and Freddie and with the burst of the dot-com bubble the floodgates really opened. Perpetrated by the banking cartels and a hairless warmongering chimp at the white house the last vestiges of civil freedom started to wither away. 9/11 didn’t really help either and pretty much ever since the US economy’s only real ‘growth’ has come from the war industry.
Today the country is a house of cards, only kept afloat by wars (higher GDP), the biggest spending spree in history (on borrowed money), consumption (over 70% of the economy) and the USD which is the world’s reserve currency hence means they can scam both the American public and the rest of us into an ever accelerating debt mountain that is very likely to turn into hyperinflation the coming years.
In today’s America capitalism hardly exists at all. Entrepreneurs and the hard working middle class are still upholding some capitalist ideals, but in actuality the US is closer to Soviet socialism than capitalism. And the Obamination isn’t really making things better...
And the American dream? Sure Americans has made mistakes and done its share of damage to the world before in history, but for a very long time they never lost that dream. Today, that is almost gone too. Still alive under the surface but slowly sinking further and further away.
One after the other the presidents and their followers have together with corporate interests, unions and the politically correct slowly, but surely, deteriorated the former land of the free into the land of the serfs. Turning it into another country among many.
The American founding fathers and the constitution they created cannot be overstated in importance. But today America is turning into (to a large extent there already) the very thing its founding fathers hated, the very thing they fled from and the thing that all those millions upon millions of emigrants fled from: an oppressive socialist/fascist/collectivist (whatever you wanna call it) state built on the notion of printing money and government spending.
Once upon a time I too dreamt of going across the Atlantic to the home of the brave, now I don’t see the point. 15y ago when I started to look around the world for a future home and a first work abroad, the first thing I looked at was USA’s labor market and were within that country I would prefer to live. Today, I don’t even look there. Not at all.
And I am not alone. Mexicans are, for the first time ever, leaving Los Angeles and going back to Mexico despite the escalating civil war that goes on there.
The poor, homeless and huddled masses yearning for free air aren’t really welcome to America’s shores anymore, they could be terrorists.
This is a very short description of course; I’ve not even mentioned false flag attacks, corporatism, imperialistic tendencies or a failing school system. Also I have mainly focused on the badness, there are still good things with the US, it is still one of the best countries on the planet and people still run to it and I rather live there than in Zimbabwe - although the monetary policies of both countries are about the same.
However the dream that was America is probably already gone. And with it so is the great hope for mankind.
But I cannot help feeling some optimism. If it was any other country, regardless of time in history, Geographic’s or people, I would say that this was it, the decaying body would soon gone, forever. America however still has that foundation there… somewhere…
What is needed is a renaissance, a rise from the ashes. Please resurrect soon America, the rest of the world needs you, the real you, not the warmongering slaughtering of Muslim you.
Even back then I just knew that whenever the righteous elite complained over something, whenever Swedish journalists trashed something that lefties also loathed, it just had to be one of the best things ever.
I still feel the same, but not really the same…
You see the thing I love about America isn’t the country, the people, the scenery or the supposed ‘capitalism’. And it is definitely not the reoccurring wars, war crimes and the today looming depression. What I feel in love with and still love is the idea of America, the basic foundation with the bill of rights and the constitution.
Every scrappy looking fella in the world together with outcasts, persecuted religious and political groups, criminals, starving families, the extremely poor, adventurers and ordinary folks all moved to America and they formed what I regard to be the best, the brightest and most fantastic country ever seen on the planet.
Outcompeting and out producing everyone and everything that came before or since and growing exponentially the US was the shining beacon in a world of darkness.
Nothing has frightened and upset statism loving autocrats more than the idea of America. Every king, every emperor, every pharaoh, every totalitarian thug throughout history with delusions of world domination on the backs of the people have turned in their graves from fear.
With minor local experiments aside, US of A was, in the beginning, the closest thing to capitalism and equality we have seen.
Sadly, in today’s United States, hardly anything of that remains. Only remanence. The memory. Soon hardly even that.
Many Americans seem to think they still have capitalism or that they still live in a country were the American dream flourish and that they are still the best and the brightest. To me this is a very strange notion.
US capitalism have encountered many problems and stabs but the first deathblow came 1913 with the Federal Reserve act effectively introducing inflationary policies, mad deficits and a Marxist-style central bank albeit run by a private banking cartel. Next blow came with J Edgar Hoover and his replacement Roosevelt. Not only creating much of the great depression, but worsening it and making the best out of Keynesian lunacy.
During the first couple of decades of the 20th century bill after bill passed further deteriorating what once was the land of the free. Anti-drug laws to stop Negroes from raping white women were one such stupidity. Prohibition, which lead to the rise of the mafia and an unprecedented boozing never seen or heard of before or since, was another.
With the murder of JFK and the undemocratic, yet slightly understandable, anti-communist era and then Vietnam and the abolishment of the Gold Standard yet more stabs was made against the dying corps. Despite a slight upswing in the 1980’s things has really been going to hell since the 70’s.
The Clinton administration helped build the bubble economy and created many of the entities we talk about today such as Franny and Freddie and with the burst of the dot-com bubble the floodgates really opened. Perpetrated by the banking cartels and a hairless warmongering chimp at the white house the last vestiges of civil freedom started to wither away. 9/11 didn’t really help either and pretty much ever since the US economy’s only real ‘growth’ has come from the war industry.
Today the country is a house of cards, only kept afloat by wars (higher GDP), the biggest spending spree in history (on borrowed money), consumption (over 70% of the economy) and the USD which is the world’s reserve currency hence means they can scam both the American public and the rest of us into an ever accelerating debt mountain that is very likely to turn into hyperinflation the coming years.
In today’s America capitalism hardly exists at all. Entrepreneurs and the hard working middle class are still upholding some capitalist ideals, but in actuality the US is closer to Soviet socialism than capitalism. And the Obamination isn’t really making things better...
And the American dream? Sure Americans has made mistakes and done its share of damage to the world before in history, but for a very long time they never lost that dream. Today, that is almost gone too. Still alive under the surface but slowly sinking further and further away.
One after the other the presidents and their followers have together with corporate interests, unions and the politically correct slowly, but surely, deteriorated the former land of the free into the land of the serfs. Turning it into another country among many.
The American founding fathers and the constitution they created cannot be overstated in importance. But today America is turning into (to a large extent there already) the very thing its founding fathers hated, the very thing they fled from and the thing that all those millions upon millions of emigrants fled from: an oppressive socialist/fascist/collectivist (whatever you wanna call it) state built on the notion of printing money and government spending.
Once upon a time I too dreamt of going across the Atlantic to the home of the brave, now I don’t see the point. 15y ago when I started to look around the world for a future home and a first work abroad, the first thing I looked at was USA’s labor market and were within that country I would prefer to live. Today, I don’t even look there. Not at all.
And I am not alone. Mexicans are, for the first time ever, leaving Los Angeles and going back to Mexico despite the escalating civil war that goes on there.
The poor, homeless and huddled masses yearning for free air aren’t really welcome to America’s shores anymore, they could be terrorists.
This is a very short description of course; I’ve not even mentioned false flag attacks, corporatism, imperialistic tendencies or a failing school system. Also I have mainly focused on the badness, there are still good things with the US, it is still one of the best countries on the planet and people still run to it and I rather live there than in Zimbabwe - although the monetary policies of both countries are about the same.
However the dream that was America is probably already gone. And with it so is the great hope for mankind.
But I cannot help feeling some optimism. If it was any other country, regardless of time in history, Geographic’s or people, I would say that this was it, the decaying body would soon gone, forever. America however still has that foundation there… somewhere…
What is needed is a renaissance, a rise from the ashes. Please resurrect soon America, the rest of the world needs you, the real you, not the warmongering slaughtering of Muslim you.
Was 9/11 a staged attack?
I’ve been, once again, going over the evidence and the lack thereof for a possibility that the attack on the US was a staged attack. Whether or not such an alleged false flag attack was committed by banksters, oil companies, Israeli commandoes or by the government itself haven’t been my main concern. What I wanted was to either confirm my earlier firm belief that this was real or to reconsider this conviction.
This is important because almost everything that has happened since, from the fascist control-grid comes to internet to the invasion of Afghanistan, from the patriot act to the execution of Saddam, can be traced back to 9/11.
Especially I wanted to know why incidents like the latest leaked video of American troops committing war crimes and shooting unarmed people trying to help wounded could come to be.
I am inherently suspicious of government and have no problem believing in the existence of false flag attacks. Those have been committed before, also by US governments, so why not again? This makes me ‘partial’ to believe in the conspiracy thought and this is vital to acknowledge since it impacts the end result.
Watching, reading and seeing it all again my initial conclusion still stands, I still do not believe in the conspiracy, but I am slightly less convinced.
There are too many ‘coincidences’, too many faults, too many unanswered questions for anyone to be sure one way or the other. There are experts and arguments on both sides making sense. I would certainly want to see another investigation so in that aspect I agree with the “truthers”. And if a large portion of people believe that, as they do, that is certainly enough to launch another examination of the facts, especially since so many lives are impacted by this event and so many wars and atrocities are committed in its name.
I think this, together with the total disregard for the alternative view and bashing of the so called “truthers” are what actually makes the most compelling evidence for this being a false flag attack. Or, as I think is far more likely, a cover-up to hide government incompetence and certain individuals that should have known better and acted differently.
Was 9/11 a false flag attack? Probably not. Did the government fail? Sure, you bet ya. Did the government or some parts of the government deliberately fail? Maybe. Are they trying to cover up their incompetence? Most likely.
Maybe in 40-50 years with some new books, deathbed confessions and some declassified documents on the table we will know, until then this story will live on...
This is important because almost everything that has happened since, from the fascist control-grid comes to internet to the invasion of Afghanistan, from the patriot act to the execution of Saddam, can be traced back to 9/11.
Especially I wanted to know why incidents like the latest leaked video of American troops committing war crimes and shooting unarmed people trying to help wounded could come to be.
I am inherently suspicious of government and have no problem believing in the existence of false flag attacks. Those have been committed before, also by US governments, so why not again? This makes me ‘partial’ to believe in the conspiracy thought and this is vital to acknowledge since it impacts the end result.
Watching, reading and seeing it all again my initial conclusion still stands, I still do not believe in the conspiracy, but I am slightly less convinced.
There are too many ‘coincidences’, too many faults, too many unanswered questions for anyone to be sure one way or the other. There are experts and arguments on both sides making sense. I would certainly want to see another investigation so in that aspect I agree with the “truthers”. And if a large portion of people believe that, as they do, that is certainly enough to launch another examination of the facts, especially since so many lives are impacted by this event and so many wars and atrocities are committed in its name.
I think this, together with the total disregard for the alternative view and bashing of the so called “truthers” are what actually makes the most compelling evidence for this being a false flag attack. Or, as I think is far more likely, a cover-up to hide government incompetence and certain individuals that should have known better and acted differently.
Was 9/11 a false flag attack? Probably not. Did the government fail? Sure, you bet ya. Did the government or some parts of the government deliberately fail? Maybe. Are they trying to cover up their incompetence? Most likely.
Maybe in 40-50 years with some new books, deathbed confessions and some declassified documents on the table we will know, until then this story will live on...
Murderers!! Thugs!! War Criminals!!
Oh my… this is beyond belief and you should watch this. Watch the whole piece.
I feel sick, horrified. This is a game for these American idiots!!
If you watch all of it you see at least one, possible three war crimes being committed.
Are you still wondering why they want to close down Wikileaks and control internet?
BE WARNED! This is very graphic.
aAAharrg… FUCK!!
I feel sick, horrified. This is a game for these American idiots!!
If you watch all of it you see at least one, possible three war crimes being committed.
Are you still wondering why they want to close down Wikileaks and control internet?
BE WARNED! This is very graphic.
aAAharrg… FUCK!!
Time to buy stocks in the porn industry
Can you spot the robot?
I was reading this post from Anna Raccoon, and although I find her sentiment about the Gorgon and similar masters of our faith to hold some truth and I can see many different applications for this kind of technology, but what immediately strikes my mind is ‘porn’.
The technology to have sex online, I mean ‘real’ sex such as you can ‘feel’ the person on the other side of the screen already exists. Although a bit too expensive for the common man, it is just a matter of time. And whenever these robots are applied with sexual… attributes… in working order they will probably revolutionize the sex industry even more then movies ever did.
Will the time of the prostitute soon be over? And if so, what implications will this have on legislation? Is it still rape if you’re doing it with a robot? If you’d programmed the robot to perform felatio, is that still a crime in Missouri? How about if you make a tiny adolescent-looking robot and have sex with it, should that constitute as rape of a minor or kiddy porn? How about those priest eh? Can they make a robot of a young boy and sadomize him without having to endure, well... nothing from the Vatican?
You know what would be funny? Robot rights activist groups! Claiming that robots should be treated humanely...
But before we get to all that, we’ll probably see a lot of debates over how climate friendly robots are. Is a robot really compatible with the Church of Climatology? Maybe I shouldn’t even be mentioning this connection? Who knows maybe those climate insanoes will advocate that robots should replace humans? It wouldn’t surprise me even the slightest.
And maybe it is a human right to own a robot? It shouldn’t only be for the rich and horny, right?
Whatever your thoughts are I suggest that you soon look over what porn will benefit the most and maybe consider putting some money into it.
The pretend animosity
Something that has been going on for quite a while now is the merger of politicos within and in-between political parties. They are all becoming the same party. The political party. Well, actually this has already happened, maybe not totally, it is still possible to find slim differences, at least in the rhetoric, but in actuality and as in consequence for your vote the disparity is hardly detectable.
This is particularly noticeable whenever something threatens the hegemony of The Political Party. If a threat of alternative emerges that loathes the EU, wants to bring the problems with immigration up on the table or Pirates wanting to stop the Orwellian nightmare from coming true, or if someone says that their Church of Climatology is a fraud, then watch The Political Party go to work. We are back to Neolithic tribalism. Insult one member of a tribe and they all come after you.
As a libertarian I know this tribal thinking very well. A libertarian isn’t only against The Political Party, such a person is often also against any alternative. We don’t only fight fascists, racists, socialists and mainstream pundits; we also fight liberals, conservatives, religious freaks and tree hugging loons. Pretty much everyone on this planet is our adversary, so believe me when I say that I know how the Pirate Parties, the Racist Parties and how any anti-establishment party feels.
In Sweden as well as in the UK there are general elections this year. And in true One Party sentiment the enemies of the people i.e. politicians, brainless journalists, wannabe dictators and fraudulent pranksters of all colors and religions come together before the general election in an effort to sell the idea that they believe in different ideologies, that there’s a difference in who rule us and that there’s hostility among the elite.
Just have a look at the HealthCare debate in the US. The Republicans pretend to be against the Democratic suggestion, seemingly against public healthcare, but they are the ones that created this monster in the first place and they do want public healthcare, only not the Democratic one. The Democratic Party bash the republicans for being against the poor since they want to abolish 'free' public healthcare, which they, as said, don't want to do.
The goal of this trickery is of course to convince us to vote for any of the established political parties and engage ourselves in the theatre.
‘A vote for a third party is a wasted vote’ –is one of the main arguments being heard from foot soldiers of The Political Party. Another popular theme is the bashing of the supposed adversary, something that is eagerly followed by media hence automatically cutting out any alternative view.
The right is of course fighting for the rich and the privileged while eating babies’ in-between collecting money from big business and growing a black mustache while wearing a tophat. The left is of course taxation freaks straight out of hell spawn to do unspeakable evil to families and bring forth the end of civilization.
Any smaller parties, if they are established and sleeps with The Political Party, can also be a part of this game. Often such smaller entities get to wear one (maybe two) attributes easily attacked. Religious parties for instance often get the gay-bashing and anti-woman label. Green parties want to stop progress and bring us all back to live in caves. And so on.
These attacks and pretend animosity is quoted and lifted up as top-news every day before any general election.
The fact that they all want you to obey the law, they all want you to pay your taxes, they all want you to vote, they all want you spend your money and they all want you to go to school and learn how to be a good citizen, is ignored.
And they all fight wars for the sake of puppies, Children and fluffy clouds.
No matter who sits in government they fight the ‘war’ against drugs, the ‘war’ against poverty, the ‘war’ against inflation, the ‘war’ against unemployment. These are all unwinnable ‘wars’ almost always created by government and the politically correct themselves, but the sheople of this world always buy the rhetoric.
And no matter who is in charge the rules of the land (laws) keep expanding in quantity, size and intrusion into our lives. Not a single political party - with libertarian exceptions in some countries - has any intention of reducing the number of laws.
That the only real difference is a couple of percentage up or down comes to taxes and welfare checks, is also ignored. So is the fact that the European Union nowadays resides and decides over 70% (according to some 80-85%) of our laws. That globalization, huge corporations and anti-democratic institutions like the UN or the IMF also play a central role in any decision-making goes by unnoticed.
But the most important power, those with actual authority no-one ever speaks about, is never mentioned. At all.
The ones I’m talking about isn’t some elusive Bilderberg-group and this isn’t a conspiracy, it’s a fact. The ones I am talking about are the bureaucrats and non-elected righteous people behind the curtain.
You see with the rising of the welfare state and the unification of The Political Party those contrived to control the government can be found among departments, lobby-groups and within the structure.
They can have been hired or created by the ‘right’ or by the ‘left’, that has no meaning, they stay put no matter who gets elected. You can even fire a couple of them, but then three other will take the two’s place. Or they can be a part of some elitist group that for some reason have reached sainthood such as a female rights activist group.
These are the politically correct thugs that no matter what always strive to increase their funding and their power.
Who do you think has most power over a proposed bill, those elected to parliament or the ones actually writing the bill, commenting on it, lobbying for/against it and benefiting/ getting hurt by it?
This righteous and politically correct pile of scum have any government, no matter who they are or what ideology they are said to belong to trained to accept their every pronouncement and trained to accept the general structure as a 'done deal'. All that is left is to cut a bit around the edges, no changes, oh no, only a slight improvement, a slim adjustment, nothing else. And damn anyone not complying with this set of rules.
If a politician steps out of line saying he wants to eliminate any of these power houses he will not last very long. Because if anyone says or does anything of the sort, the entire elitists supremacy comes out in unison to shoot that person down with every dirty trick in the book. The Political Party does not abide well to any heretic, and the righteous and morally impervious will not hold back the punches.
In this game for more funding and more power everyone becomes a pawn.
For example the blacks and the gays are a means to an end. As is anyone overweight, anyone disabled,anyone different in any way at all. They are tools in virtuous hands. The 'equality' mafia doesn’t care if Muslims get the blame for their ridiculous assertions of offence or if immigrants that have been thrown out in rundown suburbs without work commits crime. Those shadowy figures encouraging black or gay militancy are not necessarily black or gay themselves.
It’s all a means to an end.
And the ‘end’ is to gain power, increase their department, to hire more useless workers sitting around doing nothing. The ‘end’ is about control, control over our lives as in controlling our smoking, drugs, driving, alcohol, sex or marriage.
They know better, they only want what is best for you, if you only listen the world will be a much better place, and if you don’t listen they will send you invoices to pay for their scam anyway or, which becomes more likely as the number of laws increases, throw you in jail.
And just as the righteous and politically correct, The Political Party has a real agenda. You see decision making in the world of the jesters and deceitful “übermench” within The Political Party is based upon vote-maximization. They would like you to think it is about ideology, differences between right and left and that they all care about the less privileged, nothing can be further from the truth.
For the individual politician it is about gaining a seat, having a taste of that wonderful buffet of tax money, and to have a piece of that control-grid in order to silence those Napoleonic voices they hear whispering in their ears. For The Political Party the game is about having, keeping, and expanding power.
In this strive for vote-maximization and more funding and control the political elite and the righteous behind the curtain are in cahoots. One implies the other.
In order to reach this goal together they employ several tactics.
The ‘wars’ mentioned above is such a tactic, another one is to have us looking at the left hand waving in our face while the right hand does something unspeakable behind their back. An example of this is while they are riding in limousines, flying private jets, lives in lavish mansions and dining and feasting for your tax money they wave pictures of Polar Bears in your face claiming that manmade global warming will kill all human infants tomorrow.
Another tactic, and probably the most common used, is that of group-thinking. We all belong to ‘groups’. It can be religious, ethnic, gender, geographical or even sports groups. If they manage to pit one group against the other they can play on that for ages.
It’s not the righteous or The Political Party’s fault that those skinheads and immigrants fight each other, nope, it is the groups, one evil racist one everyone should hate and one poor, underprivileged group that are the good guys, but in reality only used as voting cattle.
Rich white men in suits are another group everyone is supposed to hate, or so the rich and predominantly white men in suits belonging to the morally correct and The Political Party says.
Oh, and smokers! Everyone should hate smokers. They bring cancer to our shores.
And fat people are horrible obese things costing bundles of cash and the main reason why our healthcare system doesn’t work. Also thin people. Lettuce eating skeletons walking down the runway are among the worst things in this world.
Everyone with a penis is a walking rapist. A person wearing a turban is potentially a terrorist.
These groups, and many more, are engaged in an epic battle for supreme domination and you’ll better always stand with the righteous and The Political Party because they stand for the goodness and equality that will stop the group-fighting and bring peace to our time.
All you haft to do is to vote for them, and, of course, not complain too much.
This is particularly noticeable whenever something threatens the hegemony of The Political Party. If a threat of alternative emerges that loathes the EU, wants to bring the problems with immigration up on the table or Pirates wanting to stop the Orwellian nightmare from coming true, or if someone says that their Church of Climatology is a fraud, then watch The Political Party go to work. We are back to Neolithic tribalism. Insult one member of a tribe and they all come after you.
As a libertarian I know this tribal thinking very well. A libertarian isn’t only against The Political Party, such a person is often also against any alternative. We don’t only fight fascists, racists, socialists and mainstream pundits; we also fight liberals, conservatives, religious freaks and tree hugging loons. Pretty much everyone on this planet is our adversary, so believe me when I say that I know how the Pirate Parties, the Racist Parties and how any anti-establishment party feels.
In Sweden as well as in the UK there are general elections this year. And in true One Party sentiment the enemies of the people i.e. politicians, brainless journalists, wannabe dictators and fraudulent pranksters of all colors and religions come together before the general election in an effort to sell the idea that they believe in different ideologies, that there’s a difference in who rule us and that there’s hostility among the elite.
Just have a look at the HealthCare debate in the US. The Republicans pretend to be against the Democratic suggestion, seemingly against public healthcare, but they are the ones that created this monster in the first place and they do want public healthcare, only not the Democratic one. The Democratic Party bash the republicans for being against the poor since they want to abolish 'free' public healthcare, which they, as said, don't want to do.
The goal of this trickery is of course to convince us to vote for any of the established political parties and engage ourselves in the theatre.
‘A vote for a third party is a wasted vote’ –is one of the main arguments being heard from foot soldiers of The Political Party. Another popular theme is the bashing of the supposed adversary, something that is eagerly followed by media hence automatically cutting out any alternative view.
The right is of course fighting for the rich and the privileged while eating babies’ in-between collecting money from big business and growing a black mustache while wearing a tophat. The left is of course taxation freaks straight out of hell spawn to do unspeakable evil to families and bring forth the end of civilization.
Any smaller parties, if they are established and sleeps with The Political Party, can also be a part of this game. Often such smaller entities get to wear one (maybe two) attributes easily attacked. Religious parties for instance often get the gay-bashing and anti-woman label. Green parties want to stop progress and bring us all back to live in caves. And so on.
These attacks and pretend animosity is quoted and lifted up as top-news every day before any general election.
The fact that they all want you to obey the law, they all want you to pay your taxes, they all want you to vote, they all want you spend your money and they all want you to go to school and learn how to be a good citizen, is ignored.
And they all fight wars for the sake of puppies, Children and fluffy clouds.
No matter who sits in government they fight the ‘war’ against drugs, the ‘war’ against poverty, the ‘war’ against inflation, the ‘war’ against unemployment. These are all unwinnable ‘wars’ almost always created by government and the politically correct themselves, but the sheople of this world always buy the rhetoric.
And no matter who is in charge the rules of the land (laws) keep expanding in quantity, size and intrusion into our lives. Not a single political party - with libertarian exceptions in some countries - has any intention of reducing the number of laws.
That the only real difference is a couple of percentage up or down comes to taxes and welfare checks, is also ignored. So is the fact that the European Union nowadays resides and decides over 70% (according to some 80-85%) of our laws. That globalization, huge corporations and anti-democratic institutions like the UN or the IMF also play a central role in any decision-making goes by unnoticed.
But the most important power, those with actual authority no-one ever speaks about, is never mentioned. At all.
The ones I’m talking about isn’t some elusive Bilderberg-group and this isn’t a conspiracy, it’s a fact. The ones I am talking about are the bureaucrats and non-elected righteous people behind the curtain.
You see with the rising of the welfare state and the unification of The Political Party those contrived to control the government can be found among departments, lobby-groups and within the structure.
They can have been hired or created by the ‘right’ or by the ‘left’, that has no meaning, they stay put no matter who gets elected. You can even fire a couple of them, but then three other will take the two’s place. Or they can be a part of some elitist group that for some reason have reached sainthood such as a female rights activist group.
These are the politically correct thugs that no matter what always strive to increase their funding and their power.
Who do you think has most power over a proposed bill, those elected to parliament or the ones actually writing the bill, commenting on it, lobbying for/against it and benefiting/ getting hurt by it?
This righteous and politically correct pile of scum have any government, no matter who they are or what ideology they are said to belong to trained to accept their every pronouncement and trained to accept the general structure as a 'done deal'. All that is left is to cut a bit around the edges, no changes, oh no, only a slight improvement, a slim adjustment, nothing else. And damn anyone not complying with this set of rules.
If a politician steps out of line saying he wants to eliminate any of these power houses he will not last very long. Because if anyone says or does anything of the sort, the entire elitists supremacy comes out in unison to shoot that person down with every dirty trick in the book. The Political Party does not abide well to any heretic, and the righteous and morally impervious will not hold back the punches.
In this game for more funding and more power everyone becomes a pawn.
For example the blacks and the gays are a means to an end. As is anyone overweight, anyone disabled,anyone different in any way at all. They are tools in virtuous hands. The 'equality' mafia doesn’t care if Muslims get the blame for their ridiculous assertions of offence or if immigrants that have been thrown out in rundown suburbs without work commits crime. Those shadowy figures encouraging black or gay militancy are not necessarily black or gay themselves.
It’s all a means to an end.
And the ‘end’ is to gain power, increase their department, to hire more useless workers sitting around doing nothing. The ‘end’ is about control, control over our lives as in controlling our smoking, drugs, driving, alcohol, sex or marriage.
They know better, they only want what is best for you, if you only listen the world will be a much better place, and if you don’t listen they will send you invoices to pay for their scam anyway or, which becomes more likely as the number of laws increases, throw you in jail.
And just as the righteous and politically correct, The Political Party has a real agenda. You see decision making in the world of the jesters and deceitful “übermench” within The Political Party is based upon vote-maximization. They would like you to think it is about ideology, differences between right and left and that they all care about the less privileged, nothing can be further from the truth.
For the individual politician it is about gaining a seat, having a taste of that wonderful buffet of tax money, and to have a piece of that control-grid in order to silence those Napoleonic voices they hear whispering in their ears. For The Political Party the game is about having, keeping, and expanding power.
In this strive for vote-maximization and more funding and control the political elite and the righteous behind the curtain are in cahoots. One implies the other.
In order to reach this goal together they employ several tactics.
The ‘wars’ mentioned above is such a tactic, another one is to have us looking at the left hand waving in our face while the right hand does something unspeakable behind their back. An example of this is while they are riding in limousines, flying private jets, lives in lavish mansions and dining and feasting for your tax money they wave pictures of Polar Bears in your face claiming that manmade global warming will kill all human infants tomorrow.
Another tactic, and probably the most common used, is that of group-thinking. We all belong to ‘groups’. It can be religious, ethnic, gender, geographical or even sports groups. If they manage to pit one group against the other they can play on that for ages.
It’s not the righteous or The Political Party’s fault that those skinheads and immigrants fight each other, nope, it is the groups, one evil racist one everyone should hate and one poor, underprivileged group that are the good guys, but in reality only used as voting cattle.
Rich white men in suits are another group everyone is supposed to hate, or so the rich and predominantly white men in suits belonging to the morally correct and The Political Party says.
Oh, and smokers! Everyone should hate smokers. They bring cancer to our shores.
And fat people are horrible obese things costing bundles of cash and the main reason why our healthcare system doesn’t work. Also thin people. Lettuce eating skeletons walking down the runway are among the worst things in this world.
Everyone with a penis is a walking rapist. A person wearing a turban is potentially a terrorist.
These groups, and many more, are engaged in an epic battle for supreme domination and you’ll better always stand with the righteous and The Political Party because they stand for the goodness and equality that will stop the group-fighting and bring peace to our time.
All you haft to do is to vote for them, and, of course, not complain too much.
Sunday, April 4, 2010
Mama said knock you out!
“I was absolutely furious with him. All that was going through my head was to knock him [Gorgon Brownie] out.”
Those are the words of Britain's highest decorated serving soldier and winner of the Victoria Cross, Lance Corporal Johnson Beharry.
L/Cpl Beharry said that Mr Brown had not looked him or any other servicemen in the eye at a reception in Downing Street in November 2008.
To be fair, the one-eyed Scotsman hardly looks anyone in the straight in the face. He might throw a phone at you if he acknowledges your presence, but that’s pretty much it.
Then in Westminster Abbey during the Remembrance Day service last November he said the Prime Minister was “fidgeting and moving” during the two minute silence.
“I've got head and back injuries that put me back in hospital in a lot of pain quite regularly, so if I could do it there's no reason he couldn't," he said. "It was very rude.
Again I need to come to the Prime Mentalists rescue a bit. We’ve all heard the stories about drugs and certain ailments. Even though far from being confirmed by Downing Street, maybe, just maybe those ailments do cause a certain wobble?
“When he offered his hand to me I just turned around and walked away. I wanted him to think about his actions and it worked.”
A very nice and British way of smacking someone in the face I would say.
I once loudly called Sweden’s current Labor Minister a Fascist during a dinner party, this when I was a member of the same party and that was a very restraint and nice way of putting it. A body slam with the flying elbow as a follow-up would have been more appropriate.
The Gorgon is a much worse thug, so Lance Corporal Johnson Beharry must truly be a real gentleman and, depending on how you look at it, a good example of the British armed forces.
Those are the words of Britain's highest decorated serving soldier and winner of the Victoria Cross, Lance Corporal Johnson Beharry.
L/Cpl Beharry said that Mr Brown had not looked him or any other servicemen in the eye at a reception in Downing Street in November 2008.
To be fair, the one-eyed Scotsman hardly looks anyone in the straight in the face. He might throw a phone at you if he acknowledges your presence, but that’s pretty much it.
Then in Westminster Abbey during the Remembrance Day service last November he said the Prime Minister was “fidgeting and moving” during the two minute silence.
“I've got head and back injuries that put me back in hospital in a lot of pain quite regularly, so if I could do it there's no reason he couldn't," he said. "It was very rude.
Again I need to come to the Prime Mentalists rescue a bit. We’ve all heard the stories about drugs and certain ailments. Even though far from being confirmed by Downing Street, maybe, just maybe those ailments do cause a certain wobble?
“When he offered his hand to me I just turned around and walked away. I wanted him to think about his actions and it worked.”
A very nice and British way of smacking someone in the face I would say.
I once loudly called Sweden’s current Labor Minister a Fascist during a dinner party, this when I was a member of the same party and that was a very restraint and nice way of putting it. A body slam with the flying elbow as a follow-up would have been more appropriate.
The Gorgon is a much worse thug, so Lance Corporal Johnson Beharry must truly be a real gentleman and, depending on how you look at it, a good example of the British armed forces.
Shaky warzone
The situation over in Mexico is turning towards worse for each day that passes. And I am not talking about some average earthquake. I’ve been writing about the unwinnable drug war the Mexican government started and continues to escalate for a long time now.
It is time for people of this earth (excluding government that never will acknowledge it) to realize two things; firstly that the “war against drugs” is unwinnable. It doesn’t matter how severe punishments there are for peddling drugs are or how many police officers you put into the equation, it has no barring whatsoever if you throw the military at kingpins, it will always, without exception, fail. Secondly it is the ‘war’ itself that creates the problems, not the drugs or the gangs. In effect it is the government that is at fault, not the mafia or the terrorists.
Since the Mexican government stepped up their unwinnable war close to 20,000 people have died, the costs has escalated with hundreds of billions, and now the cartels are starting to attack military installations.
Apparently coordinated attacks by dozens of gunmen took place last week targeting two army garrisons in northern Mexico. Military patrols and checkpoints have repeatedly come under fire in Tamaulipas and Nuevo Leon, where armed gangs have raised roadblocks in the middle of cities and around army bases.
Jailbreaks are now so common in Mexico that most inmates don’t expect to sit off their sentences. And entire towns are being evacuated, some voluntary, others by force by drug gangs. Yeah, you read it right. Entire communities are being told by the cartels to leave or die.
Almost every day heads from decapitated bodies are found. And things are not calming down in any way, on the contrary. More and more bloggers and independent sources are talking about a civil war, which the Mexican authorities as well as their criminal counterparts in Washington are ignoring or trying to hide.
Let’s put this in a mathematical term.
I + HP + HC = HP
In this equation I stand for ‘illegality’, HP stands for ‘higher punishment’, HC is ‘higher costs’ and the summation HP is ‘higher profits’. This is contingent on people wanting drugs, which we know they always have and always will.
If you make something illegal profits for selling it goes up. If you increase punishment and in other ways increase the costs for making and selling it, profits go up.
So when the Mexican government throws military at gangs, all they really do is make the profits go way up. If they lock up a couple of gangster, then profits for those outside jail go up and that’s an invitation for more people to join in.
The solution, the only sensible and actually working solution is of course to legalize drugs. If drugs were legal they would be sold at supermarkets at a fraction of the cost and scrutinized by the market. And almost every criminal organization, as well as most terrorist groups, would disappear.
This civil war in Mexico could be over tomorrow if they legalized drugs. But you see, the government doesn’t want that, not for any nice protecting of you reason, oh no, they want this war because when there’s a war going on, who do we turn to for protection? Yes, that’s right… This is also why they are fighting the war against terrorism, the war against poverty, the war against unemployment, the war against inflation. All of these things are created by government and then fought by government under the disguise of "war".
So when a quake at the magnitude of 7.2 topples buildings and shake things up a bit, it cannot hold a candle to the damage being done to the Mexican people by their government.
It is time for people of this earth (excluding government that never will acknowledge it) to realize two things; firstly that the “war against drugs” is unwinnable. It doesn’t matter how severe punishments there are for peddling drugs are or how many police officers you put into the equation, it has no barring whatsoever if you throw the military at kingpins, it will always, without exception, fail. Secondly it is the ‘war’ itself that creates the problems, not the drugs or the gangs. In effect it is the government that is at fault, not the mafia or the terrorists.
Since the Mexican government stepped up their unwinnable war close to 20,000 people have died, the costs has escalated with hundreds of billions, and now the cartels are starting to attack military installations.
Apparently coordinated attacks by dozens of gunmen took place last week targeting two army garrisons in northern Mexico. Military patrols and checkpoints have repeatedly come under fire in Tamaulipas and Nuevo Leon, where armed gangs have raised roadblocks in the middle of cities and around army bases.
Jailbreaks are now so common in Mexico that most inmates don’t expect to sit off their sentences. And entire towns are being evacuated, some voluntary, others by force by drug gangs. Yeah, you read it right. Entire communities are being told by the cartels to leave or die.
Almost every day heads from decapitated bodies are found. And things are not calming down in any way, on the contrary. More and more bloggers and independent sources are talking about a civil war, which the Mexican authorities as well as their criminal counterparts in Washington are ignoring or trying to hide.
Let’s put this in a mathematical term.
I + HP + HC = HP
In this equation I stand for ‘illegality’, HP stands for ‘higher punishment’, HC is ‘higher costs’ and the summation HP is ‘higher profits’. This is contingent on people wanting drugs, which we know they always have and always will.
If you make something illegal profits for selling it goes up. If you increase punishment and in other ways increase the costs for making and selling it, profits go up.
So when the Mexican government throws military at gangs, all they really do is make the profits go way up. If they lock up a couple of gangster, then profits for those outside jail go up and that’s an invitation for more people to join in.
The solution, the only sensible and actually working solution is of course to legalize drugs. If drugs were legal they would be sold at supermarkets at a fraction of the cost and scrutinized by the market. And almost every criminal organization, as well as most terrorist groups, would disappear.
This civil war in Mexico could be over tomorrow if they legalized drugs. But you see, the government doesn’t want that, not for any nice protecting of you reason, oh no, they want this war because when there’s a war going on, who do we turn to for protection? Yes, that’s right… This is also why they are fighting the war against terrorism, the war against poverty, the war against unemployment, the war against inflation. All of these things are created by government and then fought by government under the disguise of "war".
So when a quake at the magnitude of 7.2 topples buildings and shake things up a bit, it cannot hold a candle to the damage being done to the Mexican people by their government.
Let’s play the latest Japanese game!
It is called “how to bring oneself to fiscal suicide”
Japanese GDP : 480 trillion yen
Japanese Government Debt (only Federal) : 637 trillion yen (137% of GDP)
Federal Expenditure (2010) : 92.3 trillion
…of which ~20.5 trillion yen is debt servicing cost
Accordingly, the average debt servicing cost is (20.5/637 = ) 3.24%
Federal taxes and other revenue is 44.3 trillion yen, which means borrowing is 48 trillion yen.
Expenditure ex. debt servicing is 71.65 trillion, of which 48 trillion (roughly 2/3) is borrowed.
If you read the last line in the fact-box again, you realize that this is a real horror story. After paying interest on its debt, Japan has only 23.65 trillion yen left, yet it spends 71.65 trillion...
Read more over at Save Capitalism
Japanese GDP : 480 trillion yen
Japanese Government Debt (only Federal) : 637 trillion yen (137% of GDP)
Federal Expenditure (2010) : 92.3 trillion
…of which ~20.5 trillion yen is debt servicing cost
Accordingly, the average debt servicing cost is (20.5/637 = ) 3.24%
Federal taxes and other revenue is 44.3 trillion yen, which means borrowing is 48 trillion yen.
Expenditure ex. debt servicing is 71.65 trillion, of which 48 trillion (roughly 2/3) is borrowed.
If you read the last line in the fact-box again, you realize that this is a real horror story. After paying interest on its debt, Japan has only 23.65 trillion yen left, yet it spends 71.65 trillion...
Read more over at Save Capitalism
What volcanoes, US bombs and earthquakes couldn’t do…
Is immigration at fault?
A 78-year-old woman in the southern Swedish city of Landskrona lost consciousness after she was punched in the face while trying to intervene on behalf of her 71-year-old partner who was being attacked by a man in a parking dispute. The woman later died at the hospital.
The 23-year-old main suspect is facing charges of murder and aggravated assault, but has denied the allegations.
You never know in a case like this and I don’t have the police investigation in front of me, so there is chance the guy is innocent, although not very likely when you read about the incident in papers and watch the news.
However, he is of foreign origin and has a foreign name so whether he’s innocent or not have no real barring to the uproar in the community. And, of course, the Swedish Democrats (SD) that are the made-up “right-wing racist” party, loves this. It is a crime, it is a crime against the elderly by a very sick and cowardly person and it is a crime supposedly, and most likely, committed by an immigrant.
Some genius “expert” commentator said the other day that SD is using the martyr-card to gain support. Next he will probably declare that gravity exists or that the sun is warm. But what that “expert” and many others are missing is that it’s not SDs fault, not really. They can just sit back and relax. Just send an article to a paper or sit in the morning sofa once a week, then they can lay back and let the mainstream pundits bash them into fame and parliament.
And when a story like this brake out it’s yet another open goal.
Both the government and the opposition have solemnly declared that they will never form a coalition with the “racists” and that they will cut them out as much as possible. In the meantime journalists are competing in the game of who can trash and ridicule SD the most.
What the public see in all this, those that don't react with the auto-responder permanently cranked up to 'racist-Nazi-bigot-neanderthal-thug' every time those two letters are mentioned. People who would not have dreamed of voting SD, who might otherwise have heard little to nothing of that party, are wondering what all the fuss is about. Why is the government so scared of them? Why are they so desperate to silence this small party? What do they offer that the government doesn't?
And even more so, people that actually live in reality, in the real world where immigration and refugees actually pose a problem or at least some nuisance, those people see events like this murder as something the elite does nothing about. Sure the murderer might get caught and punished, but the next incident is just around the corner.
And so it doesn’t matter if journalists find criminals within SD, which party hasn’t criminals as members? Aren’t they all criminals? What if some article or pamphlet is riddled with holes? How many of the elitists aren’t lying to us each day? Are we supposed to care more because one party gets “caught” lying but not the other one?
Let's face it; so many people are so tired of our politicians - all of them - that they would be interested in voting for any party that the nosegoblins say they shouldn't.
The establishment might as well start printing 'Vote SD' badges ready for the next election.
This post isn't actually about the SD. So anyone currently suffering tinnitus and steam coming from their ears, chill out, have a smoke and a double brandy and relax. It is not a post in support of the SD nor is it a post attacking the SD. This is about the problem that immigration poses, what it potentially had to do with this murder and why the Swedish Democrats are gaining momentum.
Immigration means that a group of people that may look different or have a different religion are running, fleeing or just moving and might end up in your neighborhood.
The normal thing to do for these new citizens would be to learn the local language, get a job and work themselves into the society. I actually know how it is, having lived in several countries myself, it’s not always so easy. However this is seldom how it works.
To a certain degree these immigrants are to blame for being lazy idiots, but one also needs to realize that most countries have some kind of “plan” to take care of and handle the “helpless”. Often this little “plan” involves seeing all people that are not the norm as “helpless” and - of course - they need lots of welfare, support and “help” in all kinds of ways.
Never are they left alone getting the chance of trying to make it; they obviously cannot, they are “helpless”.
These “helpless” people than need to get past several obstacles on the labor market where unions and politicians have made it very hard for people to get a job. Minimum wage is one such stupidity making it much harder for the young and immigrants to get a decent job.
Many of these “helpless” people are also highly educated and have a degree in this or that. In Sweden for instance several of the crossing guards and personnel at the subway in Stockholm are former CEO’s, doctors and nurses. Not being able to get a job for what they are trained and educated for they try to earn some money within the rules.
As if it wasn’t enough being labeled “helpless” and being ignored by the labor-markets, they also, to some extent, get welfare-money and useless stupid education thingies thrown at them in addition to being driven to live among their peers out in some suburb. In other words it is not hard to see the foundation for conflicts and resentments, not mainly for the first ones arriving, they are probably just happy to have left their country/conflict or whatever, but their children ending up with the same problems and same labels will have problems. This is not an excuse for violent or lawbreaking behavior, just a fact needed to be considered into the equation.
No matter if you are Swedish, English or whatever, getting a bunch of foreign people coming to “your home country” and claiming a piece of that pie is kind of annoying. Since journalists, politicians and most economists keep claiming that there is a certain amount of money that – of course – needs to be distributed by the political system, this implies that more people living on the same pie means less all around and maybe even nil for some of the ethnic ones (horrid thought…).
The whole situation is fueled by those little things that keep bugging the hell out of even none-judgmental people; like banning the waving of the national flag or the outlawing of certain prayers or songs that might “offend” the newcomers.
In Sweden this can take absurd turns banning schoolchildren from attending church on graduation or people getting physically forced to remove the Swedish flag from their balcony. All this creates resentments and when an economic crisis, a war or something of that nature occurs; racists come out of the woodwork having a perfect little pile of animosity to dig out idiots from.
Would this old lady have been alive if it wasn’t for immigration? Perhaps. Would rape and violent crimes statistics be lower if it wasn’t for immigration? Maybe. And for many these “maybe’s” and “perhaps” is enough. And I sort of get it; it’s always easy to blame someone, even easier to blame someone with a foreign name with another religion. What I want you all to realize is that the problems that comes with immigration isn’t firstly and foremost immigrants that are to be blamed for, politicians are.
The individual should always be blamed and punished for the offence and crime he or she commits, but the foundation for many of the crimes we see and the creation of the basic animosity lies with the elitist righteous groups that rule us.
Ask yourself this; would your government take a view opposing yours and silence you, and those who would speak for you, and refuse to countenance any debate at all that would let you have a say? Would your government use lies and deceit to override anything you might want to do or say? Would your government use the law against you, demonise and punish you, encourage others to treat you as subhuman, for no other reason than they just don't like you?
Do you smoke? Drink? Drive? Are you a little on the portly side?
Can you see why the SD support is growing? It's not because people are all suddenly racist, it's not even because people are all suddenly in tune with all the policies on all the other things because they're pretty much the same policies as all the rest of them. The only real difference between SD and the social democrats is the more focus on the immigration and refugees issues.
People have seen the way the government are working on SD and they are thinking about that while they shiver outside for a smoke, while they queue in those bars for a overtaxed drink that comes with warning labels, while they hear talk about speed cameras that don't flash so you don't know whether you're fined until the letter arrives. They are reading about fat people beaten up for being fat, they are watching the information campaigns sending hateful messages against smokers, they are consoling children scared to death by the drowning puppies of the global warming religion, they are wondering why their government thinks they are all pedophiles, they are wondering why the government needs to poke around their computer and read their emails, and they are wondering why government and the elite tries to hide that a certain percentage of immigrants commits crime.
People aren't looking at the treatment of the SD and thinking 'They could do that to me'.
They are thinking 'They have done that to me'.
The elitists tell us that the SD are evil racists. Well, they've already told me I am personally evil because I use tobacco. I'm even more evil because I like a drink. I'm yet more evil because my salt and fat intake is nowhere near the recommended amounts. I'm a crazed 'global warming denier'. I will not take any vaccine. I promote capitalism and personal freedom and I, oh gosh, don’t vote. Can you find a more evil person than me?
Looking at the list of things this government calls me evil for being and doing, Satan had better watch out for his job. So when they call SD evil, I'm supposed to consider that a different type of evil or something?
I'm not going to vote SD. Too socialist, too controlling, too much as the rest of the bunch. But I'm not the only one classed as Satan's heir. There are millions out there who have been demonised far more than me. Why would they vote SD?
Why would they not?
And immigration is a problem, and it will continue to be a problem unless we take a different approach.
One thing that immediately would get rid of most animosity from inbreeds towards immigrants and diminish the laziness of all within a country, is to eliminate all kinds of welfare. If we also scrap minimum wage laws and take away all hinders that stops people from taking work and stops people from being a real part of society, then immigration stops being a problem.
Who the fuck cares if a doctor speaks English or Swedish? Just fix me up and cure me. And why the hell would anyone care if the engineer that builds the bridge is from India? Just make a good bridge damn you.
Finally we need to get rid of the politically correct righteous puppet masters that send their thugs and spin-doctors out to work whenever and whatever happens. I too find it ridiculous singing the national anthem and waving flags around, but at least that is ‘us’, our culture and a part of our history. If you ban that with some obscure reference to immigration, is it then such a surprise that immigrants become a target?
This old lady getting murdered is a very sad story, but it isn’t the first one, and it won’t be the last. Sometimes it will be a blond blueeyed tall thug that do the murdering, sometimes it will be a black-haired Muslim called Abdullah. The problem is that we seldom talk about and address the problem with immigration and that this can and, at least according to SD, do cause more crimes.
Sometimes it feels like the established parties and the righteous actually want a racist party to bash, they certainly do nothing to stop them and sad events like this one will further fuel their upwards going momentum.
The 23-year-old main suspect is facing charges of murder and aggravated assault, but has denied the allegations.
You never know in a case like this and I don’t have the police investigation in front of me, so there is chance the guy is innocent, although not very likely when you read about the incident in papers and watch the news.
However, he is of foreign origin and has a foreign name so whether he’s innocent or not have no real barring to the uproar in the community. And, of course, the Swedish Democrats (SD) that are the made-up “right-wing racist” party, loves this. It is a crime, it is a crime against the elderly by a very sick and cowardly person and it is a crime supposedly, and most likely, committed by an immigrant.
Some genius “expert” commentator said the other day that SD is using the martyr-card to gain support. Next he will probably declare that gravity exists or that the sun is warm. But what that “expert” and many others are missing is that it’s not SDs fault, not really. They can just sit back and relax. Just send an article to a paper or sit in the morning sofa once a week, then they can lay back and let the mainstream pundits bash them into fame and parliament.
And when a story like this brake out it’s yet another open goal.
Both the government and the opposition have solemnly declared that they will never form a coalition with the “racists” and that they will cut them out as much as possible. In the meantime journalists are competing in the game of who can trash and ridicule SD the most.
What the public see in all this, those that don't react with the auto-responder permanently cranked up to 'racist-Nazi-bigot-neanderthal-thug' every time those two letters are mentioned. People who would not have dreamed of voting SD, who might otherwise have heard little to nothing of that party, are wondering what all the fuss is about. Why is the government so scared of them? Why are they so desperate to silence this small party? What do they offer that the government doesn't?
And even more so, people that actually live in reality, in the real world where immigration and refugees actually pose a problem or at least some nuisance, those people see events like this murder as something the elite does nothing about. Sure the murderer might get caught and punished, but the next incident is just around the corner.
And so it doesn’t matter if journalists find criminals within SD, which party hasn’t criminals as members? Aren’t they all criminals? What if some article or pamphlet is riddled with holes? How many of the elitists aren’t lying to us each day? Are we supposed to care more because one party gets “caught” lying but not the other one?
Let's face it; so many people are so tired of our politicians - all of them - that they would be interested in voting for any party that the nosegoblins say they shouldn't.
The establishment might as well start printing 'Vote SD' badges ready for the next election.
This post isn't actually about the SD. So anyone currently suffering tinnitus and steam coming from their ears, chill out, have a smoke and a double brandy and relax. It is not a post in support of the SD nor is it a post attacking the SD. This is about the problem that immigration poses, what it potentially had to do with this murder and why the Swedish Democrats are gaining momentum.
Immigration means that a group of people that may look different or have a different religion are running, fleeing or just moving and might end up in your neighborhood.
The normal thing to do for these new citizens would be to learn the local language, get a job and work themselves into the society. I actually know how it is, having lived in several countries myself, it’s not always so easy. However this is seldom how it works.
To a certain degree these immigrants are to blame for being lazy idiots, but one also needs to realize that most countries have some kind of “plan” to take care of and handle the “helpless”. Often this little “plan” involves seeing all people that are not the norm as “helpless” and - of course - they need lots of welfare, support and “help” in all kinds of ways.
Never are they left alone getting the chance of trying to make it; they obviously cannot, they are “helpless”.
These “helpless” people than need to get past several obstacles on the labor market where unions and politicians have made it very hard for people to get a job. Minimum wage is one such stupidity making it much harder for the young and immigrants to get a decent job.
Many of these “helpless” people are also highly educated and have a degree in this or that. In Sweden for instance several of the crossing guards and personnel at the subway in Stockholm are former CEO’s, doctors and nurses. Not being able to get a job for what they are trained and educated for they try to earn some money within the rules.
As if it wasn’t enough being labeled “helpless” and being ignored by the labor-markets, they also, to some extent, get welfare-money and useless stupid education thingies thrown at them in addition to being driven to live among their peers out in some suburb. In other words it is not hard to see the foundation for conflicts and resentments, not mainly for the first ones arriving, they are probably just happy to have left their country/conflict or whatever, but their children ending up with the same problems and same labels will have problems. This is not an excuse for violent or lawbreaking behavior, just a fact needed to be considered into the equation.
No matter if you are Swedish, English or whatever, getting a bunch of foreign people coming to “your home country” and claiming a piece of that pie is kind of annoying. Since journalists, politicians and most economists keep claiming that there is a certain amount of money that – of course – needs to be distributed by the political system, this implies that more people living on the same pie means less all around and maybe even nil for some of the ethnic ones (horrid thought…).
The whole situation is fueled by those little things that keep bugging the hell out of even none-judgmental people; like banning the waving of the national flag or the outlawing of certain prayers or songs that might “offend” the newcomers.
In Sweden this can take absurd turns banning schoolchildren from attending church on graduation or people getting physically forced to remove the Swedish flag from their balcony. All this creates resentments and when an economic crisis, a war or something of that nature occurs; racists come out of the woodwork having a perfect little pile of animosity to dig out idiots from.
Would this old lady have been alive if it wasn’t for immigration? Perhaps. Would rape and violent crimes statistics be lower if it wasn’t for immigration? Maybe. And for many these “maybe’s” and “perhaps” is enough. And I sort of get it; it’s always easy to blame someone, even easier to blame someone with a foreign name with another religion. What I want you all to realize is that the problems that comes with immigration isn’t firstly and foremost immigrants that are to be blamed for, politicians are.
The individual should always be blamed and punished for the offence and crime he or she commits, but the foundation for many of the crimes we see and the creation of the basic animosity lies with the elitist righteous groups that rule us.
Ask yourself this; would your government take a view opposing yours and silence you, and those who would speak for you, and refuse to countenance any debate at all that would let you have a say? Would your government use lies and deceit to override anything you might want to do or say? Would your government use the law against you, demonise and punish you, encourage others to treat you as subhuman, for no other reason than they just don't like you?
Do you smoke? Drink? Drive? Are you a little on the portly side?
Can you see why the SD support is growing? It's not because people are all suddenly racist, it's not even because people are all suddenly in tune with all the policies on all the other things because they're pretty much the same policies as all the rest of them. The only real difference between SD and the social democrats is the more focus on the immigration and refugees issues.
People have seen the way the government are working on SD and they are thinking about that while they shiver outside for a smoke, while they queue in those bars for a overtaxed drink that comes with warning labels, while they hear talk about speed cameras that don't flash so you don't know whether you're fined until the letter arrives. They are reading about fat people beaten up for being fat, they are watching the information campaigns sending hateful messages against smokers, they are consoling children scared to death by the drowning puppies of the global warming religion, they are wondering why their government thinks they are all pedophiles, they are wondering why the government needs to poke around their computer and read their emails, and they are wondering why government and the elite tries to hide that a certain percentage of immigrants commits crime.
People aren't looking at the treatment of the SD and thinking 'They could do that to me'.
They are thinking 'They have done that to me'.
The elitists tell us that the SD are evil racists. Well, they've already told me I am personally evil because I use tobacco. I'm even more evil because I like a drink. I'm yet more evil because my salt and fat intake is nowhere near the recommended amounts. I'm a crazed 'global warming denier'. I will not take any vaccine. I promote capitalism and personal freedom and I, oh gosh, don’t vote. Can you find a more evil person than me?
Looking at the list of things this government calls me evil for being and doing, Satan had better watch out for his job. So when they call SD evil, I'm supposed to consider that a different type of evil or something?
I'm not going to vote SD. Too socialist, too controlling, too much as the rest of the bunch. But I'm not the only one classed as Satan's heir. There are millions out there who have been demonised far more than me. Why would they vote SD?
Why would they not?
And immigration is a problem, and it will continue to be a problem unless we take a different approach.
One thing that immediately would get rid of most animosity from inbreeds towards immigrants and diminish the laziness of all within a country, is to eliminate all kinds of welfare. If we also scrap minimum wage laws and take away all hinders that stops people from taking work and stops people from being a real part of society, then immigration stops being a problem.
Who the fuck cares if a doctor speaks English or Swedish? Just fix me up and cure me. And why the hell would anyone care if the engineer that builds the bridge is from India? Just make a good bridge damn you.
Finally we need to get rid of the politically correct righteous puppet masters that send their thugs and spin-doctors out to work whenever and whatever happens. I too find it ridiculous singing the national anthem and waving flags around, but at least that is ‘us’, our culture and a part of our history. If you ban that with some obscure reference to immigration, is it then such a surprise that immigrants become a target?
This old lady getting murdered is a very sad story, but it isn’t the first one, and it won’t be the last. Sometimes it will be a blond blueeyed tall thug that do the murdering, sometimes it will be a black-haired Muslim called Abdullah. The problem is that we seldom talk about and address the problem with immigration and that this can and, at least according to SD, do cause more crimes.
Sometimes it feels like the established parties and the righteous actually want a racist party to bash, they certainly do nothing to stop them and sad events like this one will further fuel their upwards going momentum.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)