Sorry I’ve been absent of late. Been reading up on history, checking the financial numbers and trying to figure out what is actually going on. Also been planning for yet another move - to my sixth country in as many years, hopefully more permanent this time. Not really the desolate island with bananas I was looking for, but a step in the right direction.
Anyway, I cannot really pin-point each and every scam out there, but the math doesn’t lie and so something isn’t right in the state of the world.
As I have said before on many occasions the markets crashed last year, just as I predicted many years ago, but I thought they would only be able to cover it up until about now and then it would be all downhill. The first time I said the real crash would happen during the spring of 2010 I think was back in 2000, and I’ve kept to it ever since.
Granted, when looking at this outcome several years ago, I didn’t know what schemes they would pull out of their hats, so this unprecedented spending-spree and very hot-going printing presses didn’t really occur to me. Well, they did, but not at this level.
But even factoring in such nightmarish schemes, it shouldn’t matter; in fact it should only make things much worse and increase the depression into the giant Tsunami that it also have become. So how are they covering this up and for how long can it last? And even more importantly; why are the numbers all wrong and who is behind all the lying and deceit?
You see the math tells us that things have never been this bad. Never.
The correlation of trade surpluses and trade deficits between countries doesn’t match up. Strange sudden spikes on markets that should be going down. Gold that doesn’t exist is getting sold in massive amounts to secret buyers. Weird consumer loan blips. Banks are buying housing from themselves to keep prices up. Governments are buying treasuries from each other (even more so from themselves) in order to cover up that the debt market is overcrowded. Inflation (the real one) is eating into people’s purchasing power but somehow the borrowing and spending continues.
With so many countries not only owing 100% or more of GDP in debt, but also have long-term debt-obligations and pensions that is on levels in ratio to GDP on 3-400% or more (UK is close to 400% in total debt, excluded private and business debt). Stock markets are highly overvalued but are still continuing upwards.
I could go on for a long time, but to summarize, things have never looked worse than they do right now. The fundamentals are horrific; our producing power is continuing down, the debt mountain is going for the moon. It should be crashing and burning right now. But it isn’t. And since the math and the fundamentals don’t lie, something else is going on here.
There are only two things that can explain deviating numbers and why the world continues onwards.
Firstly governments are in cahoots. They are working together in order to cover up how bad it really is. They do this by buying treasuries from each other, or have their banking pals do it for them. They manipulate trade- and market numbers which they only can do if they do work together. They can keep the market optimistic by using spin-doctors and the faulty numbers they’ve fabricated and by appealing to the feeble minds of the general public. They also use minor crisis’s, like Greece or Iceland, to hide the real problems. While we’re focusing on the, in these circumstances, small problems they are sweeping away whistling jaunty tunes and telling us that there’s nothing to see here. And you don’t need to be a conspiracist to figure out that they use terrorists and wars for the same reason.
Secondly there’s something in the works here that no-one knows about. Call it an alien conspiracy, Illuminati trickery or reptilian cover-ups if you will, but there is probably a more mundane explanation to it. Lately the money flow towards IMF, the lying statistics and the strangeness of sudden spikes point to something big.
Have Japan already crashed? Is Spain being hold up by manipulators? Is the UK real-estate market totally bogus and about to fall apart? Or are they getting together and handing money over to China so the Chinese can buy up everything in sight and “help” the world economy? I don’t know, but there’s something going on.
In the meanwhile the debts continue to be accumulated, the regulatory fascism comes to internet increases each day, and governments are seemingly looking towards Kim Jong Ill for inspiration.
This we do know; the next crash is just around the corner and this time around there’s nothing they can do about it. There’s no more inflating of the bubbles, no more borrowing and the printing press will only create hyperinflation. I am sure they will try it all again with negative interest rates money-piles everywhere and more fictitious borrowing. However, it won’t work. There’s no power left in that sort of Keynesianism.
In Sweden it is clear that neither the government nor the opposition have any clue what is going on. Right now about 150 billion is needed to be saved in the government’s budget, interest rates should be forced up to 7-8% and every state owned business should be sold when there’s still time for it. I do hope, whomever you intend to vote for, that you hold these elected criminals responsible for not doing the right thing. You’ll soon understand why…
They have walked us all off a cliff and handed us an anvil. But before this cartoony end is upon us they will find some scape-goats to blame, more distractions for you to keep an eye on and some new schemes worthy of Stephen King to keep them in power.
If I had to guess, this is the reason why we’re not in a full out depression right now, they are consolidating power and coming up with new trickery before we find out what they have done.
I’ll let you know when I have figured this out. Until then I urge you all to get stocked up and get armed. This is going to be ugly.
Now… we’re did I put that toothbrush?
The end is nigh and The Greatest Depression is closing in with millions of ferocious, unemployed, disillusioned and helplessly starving infected people erratically walking an unforgiving earth for years to come. Truth to be told we´re heading for a financial apocalypse because you, the people, believe in any tall tale The Powers That Be cables out. All we can do now is to wait for the fattest lady in history to sing the highest note ever heard...
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Cockroaches
Humans of earth! Bow down tooooo meee…
The cockroach is a formidable animal. They are known for being able to survive on limited resources like the glue from the back of postage stamps. Some can go without air for 45 minutes.
Is has been suggested that these creatures will "inherit the earth" if we humans were to blow ourselves up. However, what such scientists refuse to recognize is that they already have.
Let’s look at the facts.
They feed on human acquired food and can leave an offensive odor. Check.
They can also passively transport microbes on their body surfaces including those that are potentially dangerous to humans, particularly in environments such as hospitals. Check.
Because of their long, persistent association with humans, cockroaches are frequently referred to in art, literature, folk tales and theater and film. In Western culture, cockroaches are often depicted as vile and dirty pests. Their size, long antennae, shiny appearance and spiny legs make them disgusting. I know of several just like this so; check.
Although some features aren’t compatible, I see no reason why not to think that many of these things are walking among us, posing as humans, but in reality plotting our demise with mad schemes such as ‘public healthcare’, ‘religiosity’ and ‘wars’.
The ones I am talking about are of course politicians.
Have you read Franz Kafka's The Metamorphosis? In it a man is transformed overnight into a cockroach-like creature. He views himself as repulsive in his new identity and I can certainly relate.
When I entered politics many years ago I did so with a pretty dim-witted naive look at things. Of course I knew already back then that the world was messed up and that politicians in general were evil incarnate, but I had no idea how bad things really were. Worse still is what politics does to you as a human being.
You see politics is partly about what the elitists call “compromise” which in reality is another word for finding the right coalition by bribing, threatening and in other ways convince others of your idea and then make them vote to support you.
Partly it is about doing almost the opposite i.e. thrash-talk or stab those you don’t like who are in the way. Sometimes the stabbing part is literal, but mostly it’s about finding some negative thing about their past, character or views you can exploit to your advantage.
When acting out these characteristics of politics step by step your soul gets sucked out and if it goes on long enough sooner or later that person looking back at you from the mirror is a stranger - a vile beast that will sell his mother for a couple of additional votes.
Someone might argue that this is sort of common practice in all jobs and that ‘politics’ is the same no matter what you do. This is wrong.
Ever seen a really hardcore soap opera like Falcon Crest or Melrose Place? Intrigues everywhere, everyone is sleeping with everyone, there are murders, frame-jobs etc. etc. That’s nothing. Take one of those shows, the worse one you can think of and multiply it with thousand and maybe, perhaps, take out the murders and that’s politics.
What do you think such an environment does to a person?
I would even go so far as to say that sociopathic thinking, anti-human behavior and inferiority complex are the cornerstones of any ‘good’ politician. The higher up in the food chain you get, the more your lifeblood drains away and the more that despicable cockroach takes over. To be a famous and very high-profile politician means, per automatic, that you’re one of the most evil people around.
Maybe I am a bit too condescending towards cockroaches; you can actually find good things to say about them if you look hard enough…
The sad part is that I actually where a very good politician… However I almost never compromised about my beliefs, even voting against my own party on several occasions. This, as anyone ever been in politics knows, is the cardinal sin - the worst atrocity possible is to not follow the stream, and especially horrific it is when it comes to elitists benefits. I got a whole government body to say no to a lavish excursion and several days of feasting at a castle one time, oh the looks I got from my own party members would have made Medusa proud.
Needless to say the bullying was massive for many years, but had nothing to do with me eventually leaving. I just got fed up with ignorant enemies of reality thinking they are someone just because other idiots have elected them.
And you cannot really do anything or accomplish a single thing without walking down the soul-sucking lane. You need to be despicable and be able to do whatever it takes in order to change that which is despicable. I didn’t want to be that person or take that many years out of my life for the goal of maybe change things a little.
Ever wondered why so many youngsters leave political parties and politics in general and instead focuses on single issue like the environment, animals or freedom of speech? This is why.
I think it was on the TV-show ‘Bones’ one of the scientists said that if there are aliens out there, they are far more likely to have cockroach-like qualities than be similar to us. That is probably true, but if you want to go and look for such qualities in a humanoid look no further than to your local government.
Taken from above, this might be one of the best descriptions of a politician ever written:
They can also passively transport microbes on their body surfaces including those that are potentially dangerous to humans, particularly in environments such as hospitals.
What truly makes a woman equal
Wanna rape me?
Organized rape is a tactic used to denigrate and repress political prisoners and victims of war and it is often under reported due to the stigma attached to being a victim of this crime in many parts of the world. Rather than existing as a side effect of war, in countries such as Darfur, Pakistan, Peru, Serbia and Rwanda mass rape has been systematically used as a tool for ethnic cleansing, to spread HIV, extract information and to terrorize rival tribes, movements and dissidents.
This isn’t something new, history is filled with slaves from wars and females being raped or submitted to unspeakable horrors at the hands of conquers or, as is also a persistent factor, by their own men.
One thing has actually changed this...
Not that rape will ever stop existing, there will always be rapists - female and male rapists. Always has and always will. Nothing will change that. However the main reason why women are more susceptible to rape is a physical disadvantage.
I know there are a lot of feminists out there claiming it’s a man’s world and so women are automatically prey. To a certain degree I need to agree with that basic assumption, but that actually goes for all humans, of both sexes. Actually men are much more likely to be beaten up, murdered, killed or be subjected to a crime than women.
But talking about rape it is much more common that the offender is male and the victim is female. And as said at the start, often this is used as a ‘tactic’ in wars and ethnic cleansings.
Since a couple of hundreds of years back, and certainly today, one thing has change the disadvantage women has against men. A tiny female can do nothing against a pair of big hairy thugs, right? Wrong!
Self-defense classes? Please. If you’re a woman you need a black belt to fight of one attacking man if he’s a lot bigger and stronger then you. Sure a lucky punch in the right place or dislocating the knee with a kick will do it, and it happens that even the tiniest of creatures can fend themselves against a much bigger attacker, but is that really the kind of odds you like to play? And what if there are two of them? What if there’s seven of them? No black belt or training in the world will help you then, no matter what the movies tell you.
Having training and by avoiding being alone, drunk, and stumbling around in high-heals in a dark alley at 4am will go a long way. That would make you more confident, and maybe, just maybe put you on pretty equal terms with one attacker.
I know of a couple of women that has never even been faced with unwanted sexual advances. Such females are actually, and sadly, not so easy to find. Most women do get attacked, taken advantage off or ends up in an unfortunate situation one time or the other. What is clearly the common traits for those women I do know that has avoided such things are self-confidence, self-reliance and a clear aura of “don’t try anything buster or I will bite your dick off” –attitude. Also, it should be pointed out, none of them are feminists.
However, attitude, some training and not jumping into the van because someone offers you candy isn’t always enough. And it certainly isn’t when there’s a war going on.
There is however one thing that makes all humans equal, something that will make a single petite woman much stronger than any two hairy thugs.
A gun.
I promise you all, if every woman on this planet had a gun or was allowed to carry a gun the number of rapes would go down dramatically. Even the potentiality is enough to scare of most attackers, which means that not all women need to actually have a gun. So if you’re scared of them or don’t want to own one, fine, but as long as some do and it’s legal any would-be rapists need to think very hard before doing something.
But wouldn’t this lead to some shootings and dead folk? Well yes it would, yet another reason why rapes would go down in numbers. Rapists are often multiple offenders, shoot one dead and its very likely future victims will be saved.
And this argument holds true all throughout. The people of Ethiopia or Haiti don’t need money, they’ve got aid coming out of their ears, never helped before, and it won’t help now. But give all the normal people a gun each and watch the status que change overnight. I am not saying guns would save the starving, no, of course not, but it will make their oppressive leftie governments to think twice before raping, pillaging or taxing them and that in the long run will help.
This isn’t a universal solution. I know this is an easy argument to make and it won’t solve all problems, not by far, but it will save lots of women (and men).
And, as said, a gun makes us equal, strangely then that those women-rights activists aren’t proposing and advocating gun rights. That has an explanation too, you see most such groups are formed by socialist ideas and the thing a socialist fears more than anything is if the people are armed. It is much better to have lots of raped women than a populace confident enough and armed enough to actually say no to government.
You are going to die! Part XXXIV
I always get so pissed when watching TV-shows and movies when someone dies and immediately they have some epiphany or religious experience walking around on clouds, meeting some dead relative or seeing their waiting 72 virgins licking each other (okay, that’s my fantasy…).
Yesterday I watched some old episode of Grays Anatomy were one of the lead actresses died. Of course she woke up seeing whatever, experience some other and pffff… There I was, actually feeling tears nearing my eye, and then she dies and… wakes up… seeing whatnot with whoknowswhat in some happy fluffy thingy. So stupid. I changed the channel…
Remember ‘Lilja 4-ever’? A fantastic movie about the sex trade between the former Soviet Union and Western Europe. Really great, and you have tears in your eyes all the way through, but in the end that underage girl (the main character) needs to run around on rooftops with wings. WINGS! WTF!?!? Completely destroying a fantastic movie with a couple of minutes of idiocy.
Another thing that is highly stupid on the same theme is when a lead character dies and sort of ‘come back’ i.e. walks around the survivors “talking to them” as in they are remembering that person. Probably meant to be a smooth going away goodbye of that character, but only makes it ridiculous.
Like in NCIS when Agent Caitlin "Kate" Todd in one of the most shocking moments in TV history, gets shoot in the head and dies. For TWO whole episodes her ‘ghost’ is hunting the other main characters. What could have been absolutely TV-magic suddenly turns into disaster because some softy director or useless producer likes to show a religious endgame.
And it’s almost always in American movies and shows this happens. Probably because so many idiots in that country embrace creationism, but regardless, it’s stupid.
Not to say other countries or cultures are any different. Remember ‘The Seventh Seal’ by my now deceased countryman Ingmar Bergman? But at least in many of those examples death or any afterlife is sort of part of the story. If the tale is about religion, Jesus or death I sort of get it, it’s part of the story. That’s not what I am talking about.
What I mean is when some hard-line character in a detective movie or action plot filled with alien headhunters from Venus and the movie/show incorporate lots of nudity, violence and rock-and-roll and suddenly someone dies and… goes to God..?
It just doesn’t seem right.
Yesterday I watched some old episode of Grays Anatomy were one of the lead actresses died. Of course she woke up seeing whatever, experience some other and pffff… There I was, actually feeling tears nearing my eye, and then she dies and… wakes up… seeing whatnot with whoknowswhat in some happy fluffy thingy. So stupid. I changed the channel…
Remember ‘Lilja 4-ever’? A fantastic movie about the sex trade between the former Soviet Union and Western Europe. Really great, and you have tears in your eyes all the way through, but in the end that underage girl (the main character) needs to run around on rooftops with wings. WINGS! WTF!?!? Completely destroying a fantastic movie with a couple of minutes of idiocy.
Another thing that is highly stupid on the same theme is when a lead character dies and sort of ‘come back’ i.e. walks around the survivors “talking to them” as in they are remembering that person. Probably meant to be a smooth going away goodbye of that character, but only makes it ridiculous.
Like in NCIS when Agent Caitlin "Kate" Todd in one of the most shocking moments in TV history, gets shoot in the head and dies. For TWO whole episodes her ‘ghost’ is hunting the other main characters. What could have been absolutely TV-magic suddenly turns into disaster because some softy director or useless producer likes to show a religious endgame.
And it’s almost always in American movies and shows this happens. Probably because so many idiots in that country embrace creationism, but regardless, it’s stupid.
Not to say other countries or cultures are any different. Remember ‘The Seventh Seal’ by my now deceased countryman Ingmar Bergman? But at least in many of those examples death or any afterlife is sort of part of the story. If the tale is about religion, Jesus or death I sort of get it, it’s part of the story. That’s not what I am talking about.
What I mean is when some hard-line character in a detective movie or action plot filled with alien headhunters from Venus and the movie/show incorporate lots of nudity, violence and rock-and-roll and suddenly someone dies and… goes to God..?
It just doesn’t seem right.
Washington Mutual
The failed bank Washington Mutual made subprime loans it knew were likely to go bad and then packaged them into risky securities, investigators say.
Is that manure I smell my dear Watson?
Before Washington Mutual collapsed in the largest bank failure in U.S. history, its executives knowingly created a "mortgage time bomb" by making subprime loans they knew were likely to go bad and then packaging them into risky securities, a congressional investigation has found.
Nooooo… really?
A new consumer financial protection agency, has been proposed by Obama has proposed as part of his regulatory overhaul, to stop lenders from preying on borrowers.
Well, they are going to keep Franny and Freddie and who many out there thinks that the administration that is literarily overrun by Goldman Sachs people will ever check out the tentacles of that bank?
And the main problems with insanely low interest rates, maniac printing of new notes and extra government cash thrown at new buyers of housing are still there, still increasing the debt bubble, still building on that financial disaster.
The truth is that Washington Mutual isn’t the first or by any means the last bank going out of business here. Everyone of them, EVERY SINGLE ONE, have after bankruptcy shown a 30-40 and even 50% in overvalue thanks to the scams. We’re counting 150 banks so far. If there’s no exception for this among the so far failures, raise your hand if you think the rest are really solvent…
We’re talking trillions, many trillions of dollars and the federal government has either already bought them through Franny and Freddie or promised tax dollars to cover the losses. You think last year was bad? Wait ‘till you see what this brings…
Is that manure I smell my dear Watson?
Before Washington Mutual collapsed in the largest bank failure in U.S. history, its executives knowingly created a "mortgage time bomb" by making subprime loans they knew were likely to go bad and then packaging them into risky securities, a congressional investigation has found.
Nooooo… really?
A new consumer financial protection agency, has been proposed by Obama has proposed as part of his regulatory overhaul, to stop lenders from preying on borrowers.
Well, they are going to keep Franny and Freddie and who many out there thinks that the administration that is literarily overrun by Goldman Sachs people will ever check out the tentacles of that bank?
And the main problems with insanely low interest rates, maniac printing of new notes and extra government cash thrown at new buyers of housing are still there, still increasing the debt bubble, still building on that financial disaster.
The truth is that Washington Mutual isn’t the first or by any means the last bank going out of business here. Everyone of them, EVERY SINGLE ONE, have after bankruptcy shown a 30-40 and even 50% in overvalue thanks to the scams. We’re counting 150 banks so far. If there’s no exception for this among the so far failures, raise your hand if you think the rest are really solvent…
We’re talking trillions, many trillions of dollars and the federal government has either already bought them through Franny and Freddie or promised tax dollars to cover the losses. You think last year was bad? Wait ‘till you see what this brings…
Monday, April 12, 2010
Ah, the dominoes begin to fall.
What’s that honey? A ‘green shoot’ you say?
Hideo Kumano, chief economist at Dai-ichi Life Research Institute, said recently about Japan that:
"There is no problem as long as there are flows of money in the bond market,"
Of course referring to the chance that Japan can be heading for a default.
Based on fiscal 2010's nominal GDP of 475 trillion yen, Japan's debt is estimated to reach around 950 trillion yen or roughly 7.5 million yen per person ($80,375). And it is starting to be hard for them to borrow more money.
I want you to read that sentence above again. This is the key for so many reasons.
"There is no problem as long as there are flows of money in the bond market,"
Remember all those stimulus packages getting thrown around? Where do you think all that money went? Do you think they bought food and gave it to the starving?
Remember the bailouts of certain banks? Ever wondered what they are doing with all those trillions? Hiring people?
But maybe the most important part to remember here is that there is only so much debt the market can soak up. And pretty much every country on the planet is screaming “sell, sell, sell” wanting their new government issued debts to be bought up.
How long do you think they can keep this up?
Greece, Dubai and Iceland were only the prelude and are in these circumstances tiny players, but what about Spain? Italy? Or, as mentioned above, Japan? What do you think will happen when one of those major players cannot sell their debt anymore?
I have news for you people, if it weren’t for the scams, the manipulations and the freshly printed money piles, it would have been game over already. All they have done is bought some time and in doing so seriously increased that Tsunami wave of financial and political Armageddon lurking beneth the surface.
Keep a close eye out, because once this really starts most of you can say goodbye to your comfortable lifestyle and say hello to the Greatest Economic Depression in the history of mankind.
Blood on the American flag
When the next terrorist attack strikes the US, and it will, and Americans start complaining show them this video and/or similar ones. As said before, this is how empires die…
Sunday, April 11, 2010
And so the Euro died...
Please Germany, help us!
I wrote a post a couple of days ago entitled The death of Greece – will the Euro follow? and in it I argued, as I’ve been doing for a decade now, that bailing out a membership state (in this case Greece) would be the coup de grâce of the Euro.
Of course the masters of our faith didn’t wait long to break their own set of rules and make statements contrary to the treaty they all signed - together with a €30 billion add-on to the fire of doom down by the Aegean.
The slick, olive-oiled Greeks waited for about… 75min, before a senior official told reporters that;
"40 billions (including IMF) for 2010 is part of a bigger amount for the three-year period. A logical amount for the three-year period would be double than 40 billion,"
I am watching for the time, day and date for when the rest of the shitty economies around the Mediterranean call for aid. The smart thing to do is to be first, so I expect it to take no more than weeks. My money is on Portugal because they are already pulling the screws and taking austerity measures, and I expect that Italians and Spaniards will hold out as long as possible.
Well, we also have countries tightly linked to the Euro such as Bulgaria or Lithuania that surely want some cash, but I suspect these bailouts are aimed at saving the Euro, not the countries themselves, so tough luck for those fucks.
Save Capitalism thinks that Germany will chose to leave the Euro if we go down this path, and I consider that to be a real possibility, but I think that long before that happens the cries from the other PIIGS will echo into any survivors history books. Also I expect the money printing to pick up speed pure Zimbabwe-style. This summer will be one of riots and political turmoil, but that’s just the prelude, it can only get worse.
The markets will of course like this move, and despite Russian built planes crashing with lots of Poles onboard and really horrific numbers spat out from the US I expect a pretty steady market tomorrow.
However, that calm is hiding what comes next.
How many billions/trillions of Euro will be needed now when the floodgates have opened? Shall we guess about €500 billion the coming year? And remember, these are bottomless pits. Not a single one of these countries will ever get their numbers in order. Never gonna happen.
And Germany cannot bear this burden alone, that’s impossible and the other countries with pretty good fiscal policies like Sweden and Denmark are too small, and Sweden isn’t even in the Euro. Maybe France can help out a little, but they have their pension debt to worry about.
How long can this last now when the Euro is doomed to fail?
If this was normal times I would probably argue they could keep it up for several years, maybe even a decade or two. However there’s nothing ‘normal’ about propped up markets, trillions in newly printed notes floating around, maddening low interest rates and asylum-style Debt Mountains. Add in the world-wide derivatives scam and so much more of absolutely insane schemes everywhere and I would be very surprise if even Greece will receive this first batch before all hell breaks loose.
Another Sunday rambling
While pouring myself glass after glass of vodka last night and playing the original Colonial Conquest game I sort of started to reminisce about a long forgotten youth.
The question I started to ask myself was whether or not it was better being young and oblivious.
In a way I need to say yes.
Well, I don’t miss the Swedish school system and its sole purpose of spitting out mindless robots, and I don’t miss fondling in the dark after underage breasts (really, I don’t).
However there are two things about being young that I sort of miss.
First, in relation to my current situation, I miss having a proper liver and a youthful body that after a week of hardcore partying had no problem continuing for yet another week. Pulling one all-nighter when barely having the stamina to survive the following day (today) isn’t the same thing.
Secondly it is hard not to acknowledge how much better it is to not know how beyond repair and how really screwed up this world is. This is also the reason why I still haven’t entirely given up on you sheople out there because I get it. Seeing and understanding the real world isn’t a good thing, it doesn’t give you pleasure or release. On the contrary. If you don’t want to live in fear and sadness or walk around within a cloud of cynical apathy, the best thing you can do is to ignore reality and never, never go out and look for the truth.
I think people have a built-in safety mechanism that automatically responds to any distress in our surroundings with the ‘that will never happen here / to me’ and, the ever so funny; ‘those people are nuts’. This kind of automated reaction may be good for a person in the short run, might even be great (especially since that pesky reality is kept at a distance). But it also leads to certain problems.
Because when government are seeking henchmen for their righteous army or looking for silent consent it has no problem getting just that.
What did you say? Jews getting transported on trains to death factories? No, that would never happen, if anyone says that they are nuts.
But we don’t need to Godwin ourselves to find examples of the same phenomenon.
The scientists at the UN and our government say they need to tax our cars? Maybe that’s the right thing to do then... Those nuts claiming my money only goes down the drain for no reason whatsoever are only conspiracists…
People are dying in a foreign land from starvation and wars? Those Africans/Muslims/Asians/[insert] people have brought it on themselves. That will never happen here.
I could go on for a long time, but I think you get the idea.
This is why it is so easy for them to con you with false flag attacks, and why it is so easy to get your money to fund new schemes. You’re giving them a free ride, and you are the one paying for it – all for the sake of ignoring and hiding from reality.
And we all know what the price is for going against the stream. You’ll become a nut, an outcast, and the best epithet you will ever receive is “he walks his own way”.
Do you know who the really great leaders of men have been making a mark on history? It has been the ones “going their own way”.
Want to be a hero or be remembered? Start to think, see reality and go your own fucking way.
Most of you won’t do this of course. Maybe no-one will.
Instead you will listen and comply like the good little sheep the powers want you to be.
Don’t speak on the phone while driving, don’t drink, don’t smoke, and don’t eat fat, suger, candy, meat or a million other things. Any drug, flue, dog, wolf, or too many mini pizzas will kill you. Stay away from cell-phones, computers, TV’s, Radios, microwaves, and all other things generating electrical fields, they may kill you. Don’t swim after eating; don’t eat fifty-five eggs each morning because it increases your chance of getting cancer by 0.01%. Sunrays are dangerous, cold is dangerous, wind, rainfall, storms and landslides are dangerous. And out there, around you, there are pedophiles, terrorists and drug dealers hiding behind every bush. All men are rapists and all Muslims want you dead.
This is what they are selling you, and this is what you are buying. FEAR.
Fear of seeing reality, fear of going outside the norm, fear of standing up for yourself.
You are afraid of knowing, and I do understand, I get it. As I said, this is one thing about being young I miss. Being innocent and oblivious was, and for most of you out there it still is blissful.
I’ll give you a way out, a way you won’t be so afraid and become able to face reality; see the fun in it!
People are living on volcanoes and get surprised when lava flows into their living room. People go swimming with sharks and get taken aback when one arm is missing. Millions are starving to death or dying from wars right now. There are millions unemployed while your government is building monuments over themselves or bombing Afghan villages. While they demand that you pay taxes, they fly around in private jets, are drinking champagne and telling you want to do, and this on your tab, with your money!
This is funny shit!
It is time to wake up people. You cannot watch the idiot box anymore and let them dupe you into seeing things that aren’t there.
Consider this; 50y ago in a western household a family could survive on one salary. Sure they didn’t have the same level of technology, but they survived, many even thrived, and most didn’t have debt coming out of their ears despite owning a house and a couple of cars.
Today we need at least two salaries in a household to get by, and this with a higher level of technology and much higher productivity. Why do you think that is? Have you ever asked that question?
We should be able to live on half of one salary today compared to 50 years ago; instead it is the other way around. HAVE YOU WONDERED WHY THIS IS?
For many years - in my opinion since the dawn of agriculture - we have had the means and wealth to feed, clothe and equip every single person on this planet. Several times over. Still a billion people are starving, and even in the ‘modern’ developed countries there’s massive unemployment and misery. HAVE YOU EVER WONDERED WHY THIS IS?
What I am is a believer in capitalism, which has NOTHING to do with today’s societies.
You see I like tobacco, I like to drink, I like to fornicate (with the right person on my terms) and I like being my own man making my own decisions. This has nothing or very little to do with money. If you think so they have fooled you from the start.
Capitalism isn’t about money or wealth, that’s a lie being told to you from rich and powerful people in order to fool you into believing someone else have stolen your wealth. Well, someone has, but it isn’t any capitalist system.
I have never own a car, never. I’ve not own a TV in 11 years, and I’m a very unwilling participant of the x-mas hype. In fact I cannot remember the last time I bought a x-mas gift. I’ve never cared about money or status other than a way to pay for the next drink. And I have never borrowed money to spend it.
I don’t believe there’s a life after this one, consequently I recon I’ll better do the best I can with what I got during my 80 or so years on this planet. This is what made me into a true believer of capitalism – made me an advocate of life.
Because to truly have a chance to make the best out of your life you need to be ‘allowed’ to. Capitalism lets you, as the only system, it lets you be you.
Can you see why all of our enemies hate capitalism?
They have told you that only rich white folks in suits working on Wall Street are capitalists. Everything on this planet that we think is horrible (that is not blamed on manmade global warming) is blamed on capitalism.
Have you checked the facts? Do you know why they say that? USA of today is closer to Soviet communism than capitalism, but still America is said to be the Mecca of capitalism and the evil empire of greed.
Can you mention a single thing that’s not regulated, taxed, restricted or outlawed? I can’t, not in any country.
To live in a world so restricted is horrifying (and it is anti-capitalist) - if we cannot enjoy things, what’s the point?
I’m no anarchist, that’s not what capitalism is. There are laws and regulations but very constricted as capitalism is built on the premise that you can do whatever you want until you encounter another individual that has the same right.
Within a capitalist society you would be able to run down the street naked while smoking a cigar and then turn into a ‘Fatty Joe’s place’ for a juicy beef and a glass of vodka. Then you can take a man home to sadomize, and then marry him without worrying about licenses or laws. During the daytime you can work as a stock broker or prostitute and the money you earn is yours, no-one else’s. No taxes. When you go shopping at the supermarket there would be shelves of cocaine, guns, alcohol and porn to chose from. And no-one would force you to do military service or steal people’s money to buy weapons of war and then wage wars.
The very few politicians that would exist in a capitalist state would have so few tasks to do and earn so little money that they would be both bored and pretty broke.
Do you see why the elitists hate capitalism?
Capitalism is about being proud of who you are and make the best of what you got. Capitalism is to be free from the starting point. If you want to be something, learn something or do something, that’s your own path - no-one else’s. You are your own king, you decide over your body, money and soul. You would decide where to work, how to live and what color your house would have. The only thing that would restrict your actions and choices is the free will and equal rights of other men.
No wonder the righteous know-it-all people and morally ‘superior’ thugs that run our lives today hate capitalism.
Throughout history, with no exception, the best and the brightest societies have embraced some or much of what is the capitalist ideal. And, again with no exception, when they failed and crumbled they’ve instead embraced restriction, control, government intervention and statism.
This is also what is going on today. Capitalism (or at least half of capitalism) built our modern societies, created our wealth and made us leave poverty behind. Humanity’s best century of all time, the 19th century, created so much momentum and lifted so many people from dirt poverty to prosperity that we still live on momentum today.
This has gradually changed. They are still keeping some level of market economy around, they are not stupid, they know what creates value. But the interventions, the regulations, the laws and the imposed planning of our lives and economic system have halted our progress, and in many cases even turned it around.
They say we need bailouts, stimulus, lower interest rates and more regulations to curve the problems of our financial system. The fact that bailouts, stimulus, low interest rates and regulations are what caused the problems in the first place is totally ignored.
They are trying to fix regulatory statism with more of the same. Hilarious isn’t it?
This is why it’s going to crash again, and this time it won’t take 6 years like the last bubble, no it is about to burst at any moment. No doubt they will blame greed, capitalism, Jews, Muslims or some other scapegoat, just as they always have. Will you buy it this time too? Probably. Being afraid and ignoring reality you sheople out there will eat it up.
Funny enough, this time around, with a situation far, far worse than the minor depression in the 30’s, the hysterical problems will be massive and so the hysterical solutions put forward by hysterical men will most likely be worse then back then. And remember what we have today they didn’t have back then; weapons of mass destruction…
Very entertaining times ahead...
The question I started to ask myself was whether or not it was better being young and oblivious.
In a way I need to say yes.
Well, I don’t miss the Swedish school system and its sole purpose of spitting out mindless robots, and I don’t miss fondling in the dark after underage breasts (really, I don’t).
However there are two things about being young that I sort of miss.
First, in relation to my current situation, I miss having a proper liver and a youthful body that after a week of hardcore partying had no problem continuing for yet another week. Pulling one all-nighter when barely having the stamina to survive the following day (today) isn’t the same thing.
Secondly it is hard not to acknowledge how much better it is to not know how beyond repair and how really screwed up this world is. This is also the reason why I still haven’t entirely given up on you sheople out there because I get it. Seeing and understanding the real world isn’t a good thing, it doesn’t give you pleasure or release. On the contrary. If you don’t want to live in fear and sadness or walk around within a cloud of cynical apathy, the best thing you can do is to ignore reality and never, never go out and look for the truth.
I think people have a built-in safety mechanism that automatically responds to any distress in our surroundings with the ‘that will never happen here / to me’ and, the ever so funny; ‘those people are nuts’. This kind of automated reaction may be good for a person in the short run, might even be great (especially since that pesky reality is kept at a distance). But it also leads to certain problems.
Because when government are seeking henchmen for their righteous army or looking for silent consent it has no problem getting just that.
What did you say? Jews getting transported on trains to death factories? No, that would never happen, if anyone says that they are nuts.
But we don’t need to Godwin ourselves to find examples of the same phenomenon.
The scientists at the UN and our government say they need to tax our cars? Maybe that’s the right thing to do then... Those nuts claiming my money only goes down the drain for no reason whatsoever are only conspiracists…
People are dying in a foreign land from starvation and wars? Those Africans/Muslims/Asians/[insert] people have brought it on themselves. That will never happen here.
I could go on for a long time, but I think you get the idea.
This is why it is so easy for them to con you with false flag attacks, and why it is so easy to get your money to fund new schemes. You’re giving them a free ride, and you are the one paying for it – all for the sake of ignoring and hiding from reality.
And we all know what the price is for going against the stream. You’ll become a nut, an outcast, and the best epithet you will ever receive is “he walks his own way”.
Do you know who the really great leaders of men have been making a mark on history? It has been the ones “going their own way”.
Want to be a hero or be remembered? Start to think, see reality and go your own fucking way.
Most of you won’t do this of course. Maybe no-one will.
Instead you will listen and comply like the good little sheep the powers want you to be.
Don’t speak on the phone while driving, don’t drink, don’t smoke, and don’t eat fat, suger, candy, meat or a million other things. Any drug, flue, dog, wolf, or too many mini pizzas will kill you. Stay away from cell-phones, computers, TV’s, Radios, microwaves, and all other things generating electrical fields, they may kill you. Don’t swim after eating; don’t eat fifty-five eggs each morning because it increases your chance of getting cancer by 0.01%. Sunrays are dangerous, cold is dangerous, wind, rainfall, storms and landslides are dangerous. And out there, around you, there are pedophiles, terrorists and drug dealers hiding behind every bush. All men are rapists and all Muslims want you dead.
This is what they are selling you, and this is what you are buying. FEAR.
Fear of seeing reality, fear of going outside the norm, fear of standing up for yourself.
You are afraid of knowing, and I do understand, I get it. As I said, this is one thing about being young I miss. Being innocent and oblivious was, and for most of you out there it still is blissful.
I’ll give you a way out, a way you won’t be so afraid and become able to face reality; see the fun in it!
People are living on volcanoes and get surprised when lava flows into their living room. People go swimming with sharks and get taken aback when one arm is missing. Millions are starving to death or dying from wars right now. There are millions unemployed while your government is building monuments over themselves or bombing Afghan villages. While they demand that you pay taxes, they fly around in private jets, are drinking champagne and telling you want to do, and this on your tab, with your money!
This is funny shit!
It is time to wake up people. You cannot watch the idiot box anymore and let them dupe you into seeing things that aren’t there.
Consider this; 50y ago in a western household a family could survive on one salary. Sure they didn’t have the same level of technology, but they survived, many even thrived, and most didn’t have debt coming out of their ears despite owning a house and a couple of cars.
Today we need at least two salaries in a household to get by, and this with a higher level of technology and much higher productivity. Why do you think that is? Have you ever asked that question?
We should be able to live on half of one salary today compared to 50 years ago; instead it is the other way around. HAVE YOU WONDERED WHY THIS IS?
For many years - in my opinion since the dawn of agriculture - we have had the means and wealth to feed, clothe and equip every single person on this planet. Several times over. Still a billion people are starving, and even in the ‘modern’ developed countries there’s massive unemployment and misery. HAVE YOU EVER WONDERED WHY THIS IS?
What I am is a believer in capitalism, which has NOTHING to do with today’s societies.
You see I like tobacco, I like to drink, I like to fornicate (with the right person on my terms) and I like being my own man making my own decisions. This has nothing or very little to do with money. If you think so they have fooled you from the start.
Capitalism isn’t about money or wealth, that’s a lie being told to you from rich and powerful people in order to fool you into believing someone else have stolen your wealth. Well, someone has, but it isn’t any capitalist system.
I have never own a car, never. I’ve not own a TV in 11 years, and I’m a very unwilling participant of the x-mas hype. In fact I cannot remember the last time I bought a x-mas gift. I’ve never cared about money or status other than a way to pay for the next drink. And I have never borrowed money to spend it.
I don’t believe there’s a life after this one, consequently I recon I’ll better do the best I can with what I got during my 80 or so years on this planet. This is what made me into a true believer of capitalism – made me an advocate of life.
Because to truly have a chance to make the best out of your life you need to be ‘allowed’ to. Capitalism lets you, as the only system, it lets you be you.
Can you see why all of our enemies hate capitalism?
They have told you that only rich white folks in suits working on Wall Street are capitalists. Everything on this planet that we think is horrible (that is not blamed on manmade global warming) is blamed on capitalism.
Have you checked the facts? Do you know why they say that? USA of today is closer to Soviet communism than capitalism, but still America is said to be the Mecca of capitalism and the evil empire of greed.
Can you mention a single thing that’s not regulated, taxed, restricted or outlawed? I can’t, not in any country.
To live in a world so restricted is horrifying (and it is anti-capitalist) - if we cannot enjoy things, what’s the point?
I’m no anarchist, that’s not what capitalism is. There are laws and regulations but very constricted as capitalism is built on the premise that you can do whatever you want until you encounter another individual that has the same right.
Within a capitalist society you would be able to run down the street naked while smoking a cigar and then turn into a ‘Fatty Joe’s place’ for a juicy beef and a glass of vodka. Then you can take a man home to sadomize, and then marry him without worrying about licenses or laws. During the daytime you can work as a stock broker or prostitute and the money you earn is yours, no-one else’s. No taxes. When you go shopping at the supermarket there would be shelves of cocaine, guns, alcohol and porn to chose from. And no-one would force you to do military service or steal people’s money to buy weapons of war and then wage wars.
The very few politicians that would exist in a capitalist state would have so few tasks to do and earn so little money that they would be both bored and pretty broke.
Do you see why the elitists hate capitalism?
Capitalism is about being proud of who you are and make the best of what you got. Capitalism is to be free from the starting point. If you want to be something, learn something or do something, that’s your own path - no-one else’s. You are your own king, you decide over your body, money and soul. You would decide where to work, how to live and what color your house would have. The only thing that would restrict your actions and choices is the free will and equal rights of other men.
No wonder the righteous know-it-all people and morally ‘superior’ thugs that run our lives today hate capitalism.
Throughout history, with no exception, the best and the brightest societies have embraced some or much of what is the capitalist ideal. And, again with no exception, when they failed and crumbled they’ve instead embraced restriction, control, government intervention and statism.
This is also what is going on today. Capitalism (or at least half of capitalism) built our modern societies, created our wealth and made us leave poverty behind. Humanity’s best century of all time, the 19th century, created so much momentum and lifted so many people from dirt poverty to prosperity that we still live on momentum today.
This has gradually changed. They are still keeping some level of market economy around, they are not stupid, they know what creates value. But the interventions, the regulations, the laws and the imposed planning of our lives and economic system have halted our progress, and in many cases even turned it around.
They say we need bailouts, stimulus, lower interest rates and more regulations to curve the problems of our financial system. The fact that bailouts, stimulus, low interest rates and regulations are what caused the problems in the first place is totally ignored.
They are trying to fix regulatory statism with more of the same. Hilarious isn’t it?
This is why it’s going to crash again, and this time it won’t take 6 years like the last bubble, no it is about to burst at any moment. No doubt they will blame greed, capitalism, Jews, Muslims or some other scapegoat, just as they always have. Will you buy it this time too? Probably. Being afraid and ignoring reality you sheople out there will eat it up.
Funny enough, this time around, with a situation far, far worse than the minor depression in the 30’s, the hysterical problems will be massive and so the hysterical solutions put forward by hysterical men will most likely be worse then back then. And remember what we have today they didn’t have back then; weapons of mass destruction…
Very entertaining times ahead...
Friday, April 9, 2010
Today I'll buy Polish vodka
A plane carrying Polish President Lech Kaczynski has crashed. Mr Kaczynski was on board along with his wife Maria and several senior government figures including the army chief of staff Gen Franciszek Gagor, central bank governor Slawomir Skrzypek and deputy Foreign Minister Andrzej Kremer.
They were in Russia to mark the 70th anniversary of the Katyn massacre, when the communists killed thousands of Poles. One of hundreds of massacres and mass graves littering the Russian landscape curtsey of socialist policies.
So a president (and Eurosceptic) seriously disliked by Russian authorities is together with the army chief and other dignitaries on his way to commemorate lots of dead Poles by the hands of leftie Russians, they flew a Russian plane (Tupolev 154) and they end up being crispy corpses themselves on Russian soil…
So it is not unlikely that conspiracists will be watching this right now cooking up some plot about shape shifting relatives of the British Queen psychically channeling the Spirit of Stalin to bring down the plane to start WW III.
However there are no indications so far of foul play, just an ironic demise of many of the top wigs in Polish politics, which of course will cause some serious internal Polish problems and probably won’t do any good for the financial markets when they open on Monday. Another story like this during the weekend adding to the Greeks getting sucked into a black hole of despair and we’ll see a market crash next week.
I’ll be watching this closely with popcorn and some polish vodka…
They were in Russia to mark the 70th anniversary of the Katyn massacre, when the communists killed thousands of Poles. One of hundreds of massacres and mass graves littering the Russian landscape curtsey of socialist policies.
So a president (and Eurosceptic) seriously disliked by Russian authorities is together with the army chief and other dignitaries on his way to commemorate lots of dead Poles by the hands of leftie Russians, they flew a Russian plane (Tupolev 154) and they end up being crispy corpses themselves on Russian soil…
So it is not unlikely that conspiracists will be watching this right now cooking up some plot about shape shifting relatives of the British Queen psychically channeling the Spirit of Stalin to bring down the plane to start WW III.
However there are no indications so far of foul play, just an ironic demise of many of the top wigs in Polish politics, which of course will cause some serious internal Polish problems and probably won’t do any good for the financial markets when they open on Monday. Another story like this during the weekend adding to the Greeks getting sucked into a black hole of despair and we’ll see a market crash next week.
I’ll be watching this closely with popcorn and some polish vodka…
Ready for a reality check?
For those of you who can handle a goodly dose of reality, you might be interested in what Alan Watt has to say:
6th April:
7th April:
8th April:
Visit Alan Watt's site for the documentation that backs up his arguments. You might want to purchase his wares once you're there. What I've seen so far is excellent.
6th April:
7th April:
8th April:
Visit Alan Watt's site for the documentation that backs up his arguments. You might want to purchase his wares once you're there. What I've seen so far is excellent.
The death of Greece – the Euro to follow?
Anyone following the news ticking in about our olive-oiled friends down by the Aegean are either laughing or crying today. I am, of course, laughing. Remember, today is Friday, this is significant for market manipulators. I wonder what they will say during the weekend…
I will let the people over at ZeroHedge explain:
If this information is correct, it is all over. Bloomberg calculates the yield on the Greek 3 Month as determined by the bid, or where investors are willing to buy it, based on BVAL sources at 21.3%. In all honesty the bid/offer market in the 3 Month are all over the place. HDAT gives it as 99.650x99.840, BVAL is at 99.470x99.773. The HDAT bid implies a yield of 14.049%, which is still game over for Greece.
Greece plans to sell €600 million in 6 Month and €600 million in 12 Month Bills on April 13. Sorry, if the 3M is anywhere close to 14% bid (let alone 21%), this is not happening.
The Market Ticker thinks that:
Greece needs to pull out of the Euro now and take the hit. There is a point beyond which the spiral tightens beyond all reason, and they may already be into the vortex too far to do anything meaningful, but this much is certain – the longer they delay the worse it’s going to get.
I am not so sure about that myself. Defaulting, setting up their own currency and jumping ship may actually, at least in the short run, be much, much worse. Their best bet, from Greece’s point of view, is still to rely on the Eurozone to come and rescue them.
However, such a move is contingent on Germany actually allowing it to happen. And even IF that is the case, what about the ramifications? Can they break their own laws and bail out an entire country?
And IF they do we have Italy, Spain, Portugal and possibly Ireland waiting in the wings for their bailouts. In effect, bailing out Greece would be the coup de grâce of the Euro.
What? ‘IMF’ you say? Well, good luck with that one…
And don't come saying "no-one told you so", I did, many did. We've been saying it for years. Time to start paying attention soon?
I will let the people over at ZeroHedge explain:
If this information is correct, it is all over. Bloomberg calculates the yield on the Greek 3 Month as determined by the bid, or where investors are willing to buy it, based on BVAL sources at 21.3%. In all honesty the bid/offer market in the 3 Month are all over the place. HDAT gives it as 99.650x99.840, BVAL is at 99.470x99.773. The HDAT bid implies a yield of 14.049%, which is still game over for Greece.
Greece plans to sell €600 million in 6 Month and €600 million in 12 Month Bills on April 13. Sorry, if the 3M is anywhere close to 14% bid (let alone 21%), this is not happening.
The Market Ticker thinks that:
Greece needs to pull out of the Euro now and take the hit. There is a point beyond which the spiral tightens beyond all reason, and they may already be into the vortex too far to do anything meaningful, but this much is certain – the longer they delay the worse it’s going to get.
I am not so sure about that myself. Defaulting, setting up their own currency and jumping ship may actually, at least in the short run, be much, much worse. Their best bet, from Greece’s point of view, is still to rely on the Eurozone to come and rescue them.
However, such a move is contingent on Germany actually allowing it to happen. And even IF that is the case, what about the ramifications? Can they break their own laws and bail out an entire country?
And IF they do we have Italy, Spain, Portugal and possibly Ireland waiting in the wings for their bailouts. In effect, bailing out Greece would be the coup de grâce of the Euro.
What? ‘IMF’ you say? Well, good luck with that one…
And don't come saying "no-one told you so", I did, many did. We've been saying it for years. Time to start paying attention soon?
Now put on the music and shake it baby
Internet a breeding ground for extremists?
I’ve said it before; the anti-internet campaigning is just getting started. Apparently some Swedish journalists have figured out that racists and the ‘extreme right’ is very strong and growing online.
So horrible.
On the other side of the pond this has been argued by Democrats and liberals for a long time. And since Ron Paul gather many of his supporters on the internet, the ‘conservatives’ are tagging along. Cannot have contradictory views out there now can we?
Me, I hardly notice ‘extremists’ at all, from any side, well despite myself and lots of other libertarians that are “extreme right” (in one sense) so we’re very likely to get bunched together with KKK members and skinheads. Easier to discard sensible humanists and peace loving citizens looking out for the little guy if all such individuals are labeled ‘racist’...
It is likely I’ve stumbled upon one or two blogs when checking stories, but as far as I can tell the racists and what the mainstream journalists call ‘ultra right’ are very hard to find. And those that you can find are terrible writers with low or no intellect.
Basically a ‘extreme right’ blog copy and paste a certain news story and then they write one or two sentences with amoeba-like qualities like; “If we just kill all the negroes, everything would be fine”.
According to certain journalists this makes them very dangerous and apparently they can grow their numbers this way.
Really?
If that really is the case, which I seriously doubt, people in general are even more stupid than even I thought.
The story also goes that commentator’s on papers and such online are to a large degree hiding behind pseudonyms in order to spread their hatred.
This I do, to a small extent, agree with. Visiting a commentator field you can always find one Marxist saying we should kill all directors, one racist that believes that Auschwitz is a made-up fictional tale, and some youngster hiding behind the screen writing obnoxious stuff for the fun of it.
Most of the people writing are however ordinary folks showing their anger or correcting journalists that are more than often wrong.
The problem here is that a normal guy saying that immigrants are “getting away with murder” is bunched together with the racist one. Also every time someone complains over problems with refugees or that immigrants committing too many crimes or that Shari’a laws are an abomination, are also ‘racists’.
This is of course a lie, and a deliberate one at that.
Are people getting pissed that some immigrant comes to their country, spits on the laws, lives on welfare and murders some defenseless pensioner? Nooo? How can that be?
This is the sort of ‘thinking’ that have given momentum to racism in the first place.
Our masters only have two ways of dealing with racists.
The first, and most common one, is to basically ignore them. Cut them out. Refuse to take in any publication, ideas, exhibits or lecturers that might be dangerous ‘ultra rightists’. And if any such thing appears then in step the stone throwing hippies and fascist anarchists that are just as bad, or worse, to knock the racists out. Seldom condemned by the mainstream media (with the occasional “bad little leftie” automatic response as the exception) they can take streets, destroy property and burn cars and it is all for a good cause – to get rid of ‘right-wing extremists’.
This first way isn’t working, never has and never will. This because it make people sympathetic to the racists cause, because they get bullied by the elitists and their underlings and consequently get martyrdom. But also because some of the issues raised by them are actually true, partly or fully. There are problems with immigrations, there are problems with refugees, there are crashes of cultures and there are fanatics within certain immigration groups that are just as dangerous as any racist.
Just because racists are stupid enough to think that knocking off some Jew or shooting some Muslims will solve the problem, doesn’t mean that the actual underlying problem isn’t there.
The second way of dealing with racism is probably even more stupid then the first one. This is the ‘word-game’, and this anti-internet thingy is an example of that. Anything and anyone not compliant with the mainstream politically correct view is an example of racism.
Want to enforce the law on immigrants? Racism. Want to stop immigration for a while so the ones already here can settle before we take in more? Racism. Want to celebrate in church? Racism. Wave the American/British/Swedish flag? Racism. Singing the national anthem on graduation? Racism. Say you hate Muslim fanatics? Racism. If you don’t like Jewish atrocities in Gaza? Racism.
And if you’re not racist, you’re “ultra right” and/or an extremist that makes Hitler look peaceful.
Getting Godwin’ed is a way of life for most of us, and this on a daily basis.
Under the surface ordinary, peaceful, law-abiding citizens see the problems that are ignored and the animosity grows. In affect this actually creates “racists”, not suppress them as the intention is.
The powers that be are mostly just ignorant fools; they don’t understand that they actually are the ones creating the problems. Firstly by making immigrants unemployed, forcing them to live in ghettoes and pity them along with tons of welfare checks. Secondly by this anti-racist politically correct righteous crap that fuels the problem.
But there’s also another side to it. You see immigrants are to a large degree dependent on government, so they will vote for governments that give them stuff. In essence immigrants are voting cattle, mostly for the lefties.
As a libertarian I am for open borders. I see no problem whatsoever in people moving in or out. I don’t care if people around me are blacks, Hispanic or Muslims.
Why would I?
What I do care about however is that people obey the law and shouldn’t get any preferential treatment. Move or flee wherever you want, but do it on your own accord. From me you would get no welfare checks, not a single government job, no language courses and in exchange I demand that you obey the law, do what you can to fit in and learn the language on your own.
You can dance the cha-cha, play the dreidel song or go around mumbling Allah Akbar all day if you want, just don’t expect me to change my life or adjust to your ways. If you come to my country, you’re mine and my countrymen’s guest and I aspect you to act accordingly.
I’ve lived in four countries so far and I have never expected anything else from myself and as far as I can tell most immigrants coming to a foreign country have the same state of mind. But then in steps government...
As usual government and the righteous elitists are creating and worsening the problems, if you really want to eliminate racism; eliminate those groups.
So horrible.
On the other side of the pond this has been argued by Democrats and liberals for a long time. And since Ron Paul gather many of his supporters on the internet, the ‘conservatives’ are tagging along. Cannot have contradictory views out there now can we?
Me, I hardly notice ‘extremists’ at all, from any side, well despite myself and lots of other libertarians that are “extreme right” (in one sense) so we’re very likely to get bunched together with KKK members and skinheads. Easier to discard sensible humanists and peace loving citizens looking out for the little guy if all such individuals are labeled ‘racist’...
It is likely I’ve stumbled upon one or two blogs when checking stories, but as far as I can tell the racists and what the mainstream journalists call ‘ultra right’ are very hard to find. And those that you can find are terrible writers with low or no intellect.
Basically a ‘extreme right’ blog copy and paste a certain news story and then they write one or two sentences with amoeba-like qualities like; “If we just kill all the negroes, everything would be fine”.
According to certain journalists this makes them very dangerous and apparently they can grow their numbers this way.
Really?
If that really is the case, which I seriously doubt, people in general are even more stupid than even I thought.
The story also goes that commentator’s on papers and such online are to a large degree hiding behind pseudonyms in order to spread their hatred.
This I do, to a small extent, agree with. Visiting a commentator field you can always find one Marxist saying we should kill all directors, one racist that believes that Auschwitz is a made-up fictional tale, and some youngster hiding behind the screen writing obnoxious stuff for the fun of it.
Most of the people writing are however ordinary folks showing their anger or correcting journalists that are more than often wrong.
The problem here is that a normal guy saying that immigrants are “getting away with murder” is bunched together with the racist one. Also every time someone complains over problems with refugees or that immigrants committing too many crimes or that Shari’a laws are an abomination, are also ‘racists’.
This is of course a lie, and a deliberate one at that.
Are people getting pissed that some immigrant comes to their country, spits on the laws, lives on welfare and murders some defenseless pensioner? Nooo? How can that be?
This is the sort of ‘thinking’ that have given momentum to racism in the first place.
Our masters only have two ways of dealing with racists.
The first, and most common one, is to basically ignore them. Cut them out. Refuse to take in any publication, ideas, exhibits or lecturers that might be dangerous ‘ultra rightists’. And if any such thing appears then in step the stone throwing hippies and fascist anarchists that are just as bad, or worse, to knock the racists out. Seldom condemned by the mainstream media (with the occasional “bad little leftie” automatic response as the exception) they can take streets, destroy property and burn cars and it is all for a good cause – to get rid of ‘right-wing extremists’.
This first way isn’t working, never has and never will. This because it make people sympathetic to the racists cause, because they get bullied by the elitists and their underlings and consequently get martyrdom. But also because some of the issues raised by them are actually true, partly or fully. There are problems with immigrations, there are problems with refugees, there are crashes of cultures and there are fanatics within certain immigration groups that are just as dangerous as any racist.
Just because racists are stupid enough to think that knocking off some Jew or shooting some Muslims will solve the problem, doesn’t mean that the actual underlying problem isn’t there.
The second way of dealing with racism is probably even more stupid then the first one. This is the ‘word-game’, and this anti-internet thingy is an example of that. Anything and anyone not compliant with the mainstream politically correct view is an example of racism.
Want to enforce the law on immigrants? Racism. Want to stop immigration for a while so the ones already here can settle before we take in more? Racism. Want to celebrate in church? Racism. Wave the American/British/Swedish flag? Racism. Singing the national anthem on graduation? Racism. Say you hate Muslim fanatics? Racism. If you don’t like Jewish atrocities in Gaza? Racism.
And if you’re not racist, you’re “ultra right” and/or an extremist that makes Hitler look peaceful.
Getting Godwin’ed is a way of life for most of us, and this on a daily basis.
Under the surface ordinary, peaceful, law-abiding citizens see the problems that are ignored and the animosity grows. In affect this actually creates “racists”, not suppress them as the intention is.
The powers that be are mostly just ignorant fools; they don’t understand that they actually are the ones creating the problems. Firstly by making immigrants unemployed, forcing them to live in ghettoes and pity them along with tons of welfare checks. Secondly by this anti-racist politically correct righteous crap that fuels the problem.
But there’s also another side to it. You see immigrants are to a large degree dependent on government, so they will vote for governments that give them stuff. In essence immigrants are voting cattle, mostly for the lefties.
As a libertarian I am for open borders. I see no problem whatsoever in people moving in or out. I don’t care if people around me are blacks, Hispanic or Muslims.
Why would I?
What I do care about however is that people obey the law and shouldn’t get any preferential treatment. Move or flee wherever you want, but do it on your own accord. From me you would get no welfare checks, not a single government job, no language courses and in exchange I demand that you obey the law, do what you can to fit in and learn the language on your own.
You can dance the cha-cha, play the dreidel song or go around mumbling Allah Akbar all day if you want, just don’t expect me to change my life or adjust to your ways. If you come to my country, you’re mine and my countrymen’s guest and I aspect you to act accordingly.
I’ve lived in four countries so far and I have never expected anything else from myself and as far as I can tell most immigrants coming to a foreign country have the same state of mind. But then in steps government...
As usual government and the righteous elitists are creating and worsening the problems, if you really want to eliminate racism; eliminate those groups.
Had a job interview today…
Some people shouldn’t interview others for jobs. They should let HR people or someone that actually know what they are doing handle it. Not like this…
You are fluent in Swedish?
Yes, I am, being Swedish and all…
So you speak and write Swedish on a native level?
Uh? Yes, I am Swedish and have worked for Swedish companies and with Swedish costumers.
So you would say your Swedish is proficient to handle costumers?
Yes…
Have you worked with Swedish or Nordic Costumers before?
... Happily there are no ways of strangling someone over the phone…
You are fluent in Swedish?
Yes, I am, being Swedish and all…
So you speak and write Swedish on a native level?
Uh? Yes, I am Swedish and have worked for Swedish companies and with Swedish costumers.
So you would say your Swedish is proficient to handle costumers?
Yes…
Have you worked with Swedish or Nordic Costumers before?
... Happily there are no ways of strangling someone over the phone…
Thursday, April 8, 2010
Oh my God, the death gas will get us!
"My CO2 level is too high!"
A study has shown that near-death experiences, “such as seeing life flash before one’s eyes” or “intense feelings of joy and peace”, may be linked to levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) or, as it will be known from now on – the death gas.
The researchers believe that CO2 may alter the chemical balance of the brain and trick it into seeing lights, tunnels or dead people…
The study was carried out by Dr Zalika Klemenc-Ketis and colleagues from the University of Maribor in Slovenia. It is unclear who funded the research, but suspects include the Illuminati and Iraqi insurgents. The study was published online in the peer-reviewed medical journal Critical Care.
To my astonishment the UN have so far been silent, no doubt more careful with trusting ‘scientists’ after all the ‘gates we’ve seen lately.
But this is huge! Come on! Here you have a gas that in best case scenario causes hallucinations, in worst can be responsible for people dying in the first place. And this is the same gas that is melting polar caps, killing white bears, causes hurricanes and wildfires, gives us acne, creates poverty and possibly murdered Michael Jackson.
There should be an uproar over at the UN with pseudo intellectuals too busy counting the potential billions in new funding to even notice how their gold implanted desks are filling up with drool.
And where are the ones screaming about the chiiildreeen? CO2 is clearly a drug of sort, and still legal! I bet you can even buy it online!
War crimes and a firing range
Survivor of a US war crime
WikiLeaks, probably soon to be upgraded from an enemy of US to ‘terrorist organization’, have released more details about one of the warcrimes committed.
You can now see pictures of the children the US military fired upon when their parents tried to rescue wounded.
This news and similar events (remember the Paktia incident? The tossing of the live rabbit-thingy or how they are destroying property just for the fun of it?) are still hardly mentioned in US media. If the American people want to uphold some dignity these mercenary military thugs should stand trial, preferably in Haag.
However, to no surprise, US mercenaries are not the only ones having fun on the expense of Muslims. British soldiers are training to blast Mosques.
Well, I could make long lists of terrible offences committed in Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan. But the important thing to remember here is that the wars themselves, the foundation and reasons for them, are highly questionable in the first place. And the second thing to remember is that with somewhere around 1 million dead Muslims and another couple of millions turned into refugees, and with hardly any positive things coming out of the deal so far, there will be consequences.
I expect a chemical attack on London, a nuclear explosion in New York or something of the sort in the near future. And this time around it is hard, very hard, not to see that as a fair payback for the atrocities.
The sad thing about that is that such retaliation will lead to further escalation, maybe an attack on Iran. And then we can start saying hello to many more wars with many more millions dead.
Don’t you just love government?
Insano"R"us
It is apparent that whenever authorities are promising jobs, benefits and welfare, a socialist never feels the government is doing enough, never. There are always more jobs to be created, more benefits to be handed out and more welfare checks to be written.
When I hear politicians say such things I see taxes going up, I see regulations increasing and productivity going down. Maybe a few citizens can, very temporarily, gain something, but the government can never do anything without first take the money it needs. Very often, almost always, government steals it from the very same people that after the circle-around-thingy get some (not all) of that money back. This is the fact the socialist never acknowledge. '
The strange thing is that when a government cut expenditure and lower taxation I still see the exact same thing, only in reverse. A leftie however see their income, or women’s income, or the poor’s income go down but not how it is going up on the other side. In effect, in the mind of the socialist, if we lower taxes it takes money away from those that needs it (welfare) and then it just goes poff.
Well, of course some rich white folks in suits will feast on some of that money that actually belonged to the ones that government gave it to after stolen it from the same people it gave it to.
This is probably the strangest part of the socialist agenda and then I do not mean the policy itself, no, that is obviously taken directly from the asylum; I mean that people in general, the voters, actually believe in it.
It’s not even a magic trick where you look at one hand while the other does something. Here it is in the open. We know they steal that money from us so they can hand it back to us. We know they take our purchasing power away in order to increase it for us. We know they take our money so they can fly in private jets and live in lavish mansions while telling us what to do. It’s not a secret, but somehow it works. Somehow this socialist mind game holds true for almost every human on the planet.
Socialists themselves have through drugs, electric shocks, alien abductions or pure lunacy convinced themselves that this is how the world works. And then people vote for them.
Very strange.
"I, the almighty politician have a magical tree on which it grows wealth, vote for me and I hand you some of that wealth. All I expect in return is to rule over your lives.
If someone comes along and say he will take that free wealth away from you it will vanish forever. Mwa ha ha…"
Are people really that dumb? Well, yes they are George, and if you open door number three you’ll find a nice free oven to make cookies in.
Wanna get high?
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
Soon they are coming after you!
The Obama Administration has taken the unprecedented step of authorising the killing of a US citizen, the radical Muslim cleric Anwar al-Awlaki.
Assassinating a citizen without a trial? Wow, this guy must be a terrible man and there is tons of evidence that make it okay to kill him… right?
“Al-Awlaki is a proven threat,” one US official said. “He’s been targeted.”
Proven threat eh? So what did he do, did he slaughter lots of children while videotaping it? Is he a smoker?
He gained prominence after it emerged that he had been in frequent e-mail contact with Major Nidal Malik Hasan, the army psychiatrist who went on a shooting rampage in Fort Hood, Texas, in which 13 people died last November. After the Christmas Day airliner plot, US and Yemeni officials said that Mr al-Awlaki had met the suspected bomber, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, who tried to ignite explosives sewn into his underwear.
Ohoh… he had frequent e-mail contact with one man and then he had met yet another man. Interesting, but surely there’s more?
Mr al-Awlaki is believed to be hiding in Yemen, the supposed new home of al-Qaeda.
Okay…. So? Where is the evidence? What makes this guy so dangerous that he’s up for assassination?
The decision is extraordinary not only because Mr al-Awlaki is believed to be the first American whose killing has been approved by a US President, but also because the Obama Administration chose to make the move public.
We could assume there is more evidence we’re not being told about, but why not incorporate that in the official story? They are already warning the guy of impending death, so what if they say that they have DNA, fingerprints or witnesses?
Instead we’re being told that if you send emails to the wrong man, happened to bump into another man and move to the wrong place you can get killed, whenever, without a trial, by your own government.
So it makes it kind of strange outing such a murder, but not really...
This move that was made here was not the move to order the capture or killing of this guy. They were going to do that anyway. The real move that was made here was to make this public.
…you see not so long ago Militia groups, libertarians and folks with Ron Paul bumper stickers were deemed to be a threat to national security. An obscure government report it was, but nevertheless one in a long line of similar ideas seemingly setting root in Washington. And have you seen what they call the Tea Party people?
Yes, interesting times…
The end is closing in for Greece
There are two posts over at ZeroHedge you should read. Now.
Firstly:
Actually, with the 3 month trading at a mindblowing 4%+, which we are fairly confident is a record for any country, let alone a EU and EMU member, one can claim that the country will not see July in its current political form.
And then:
And so the Greek funding crisis shifts to a liquidity crisis yet again. Bankingnews.gr reports that Commerzbank, among many others, is now pulling its repos with Greek banks, essentially killing liquidity in the entire financial system.
To summarize the collapse is near. The questions needed to be answered now are; will the Germans continue to fight the bail-out? Will the Eurozone members throw billions into the Greek fire to postpone the olive-oily crash for another year or so? Will the IMF step in with their scams and trickery? How long before there’s a revolt just as in Thailand and Kyrgyzstan?
But the really important questions are what come next. Will Italy follow Greece this year or next? Is Spain about to go down? How long does the Portuguese fiasco last?
I can tell you this, when one of these bigger failures (Portugal withstanding) start to crumble and rumble, then all the rest will follow and then it is just a race to the bottom. And I don’t mean just for Europe…
Firstly:
Actually, with the 3 month trading at a mindblowing 4%+, which we are fairly confident is a record for any country, let alone a EU and EMU member, one can claim that the country will not see July in its current political form.
And then:
And so the Greek funding crisis shifts to a liquidity crisis yet again. Bankingnews.gr reports that Commerzbank, among many others, is now pulling its repos with Greek banks, essentially killing liquidity in the entire financial system.
To summarize the collapse is near. The questions needed to be answered now are; will the Germans continue to fight the bail-out? Will the Eurozone members throw billions into the Greek fire to postpone the olive-oily crash for another year or so? Will the IMF step in with their scams and trickery? How long before there’s a revolt just as in Thailand and Kyrgyzstan?
But the really important questions are what come next. Will Italy follow Greece this year or next? Is Spain about to go down? How long does the Portuguese fiasco last?
I can tell you this, when one of these bigger failures (Portugal withstanding) start to crumble and rumble, then all the rest will follow and then it is just a race to the bottom. And I don’t mean just for Europe…
This, ladies and gentlemen, is how empires die
There are few places in the world that can be so connected with so many falls of empires as Afghanistan. Afghanistan has been deemed to be "the graveyard of empires." and this for a very good reason.
The only army that can be claimed to have “succeeded” to a certain degree was the one lead by Alexander the Great (327-325 B.C.). Alexander solved his conquest quandaries by applying a combination of annihilating military action whenever possible with a process of planting communities of Greek colonists in Afghanistan. In other words kill all and everyone and then move in on the place where the dead lived with people more reasonable.
Pretty much everyone else has failed miserably.
The Red Army withdrew in defeat in 1989; the USSR suffered high casualties which caused societal problems; and Moscow’s Afghan war sped the bleeding of the already dying Soviet economy. The British tried it before that and before them it was the Mughal Empire and many others.
Today we have a force of approximately 80,000 troops constituting the U.S.-led coalition. These are supposed to be an adequate force for the assigned multi-task of keeping Karzai in power and spreading democracy; creating nationwide law and order; training Kabul’s military, security, and police services; building an economy and transportation/communication infrastructure virtually from scratch; defeating al-Qaeda; eliminating the Taleban; and neutralizing the world’s most potent heroin-growers and narcotics traffickers; protect the Afghani/Pakistani border; lay the groundwork’s for oil pipelines and protect them, and much more.
Does anyone else see the stupidity here?
I can only see two possible reasons for the continuing failure and inescapable strategic and eventual moral DEFEAT of this coalition. Either the US military and its allies are so inapt and so clueless that it boggles the mind how they even manage to do anything. Or they don’t want to ‘win’.
There is no way around it; those are the only two options.
Superior airpower, massive technology and weapons advantage, trillions of dollars and the 80,000 strong (*chuckle*) coalition have managed to gain control of the Afghan cities—which each foreign invader of Afghanistan since 300 BCE has easily won—while allowing the Taleban, al-Qaeda, and their allies to flee to the Afghan mountains, Pakistan, and elsewhere to prepare to fight another day.
They should have gone all in from the start – if they wanted to win that is.
There is only one way to fight a war. You commit your nation's resources - material and the most precious of all, human - to the complete obliteration of your enemy. You mass those resources against each objective in turn, without reservation, without holding back, without care for collateral damage or world opinion. You do so until your adversary sues for peace, not because it is the political thing to do, not for expedience, but for one and only one reason: they're tired of dying. There is no "armistice" or "cease fire" in a war. There is only victory or defeat. There is only death or life.
This they didn’t do, for whatever reason. I think it is a combination of utter stupidity and the less ambitious goal of controlling the pipeline and the immediate area with enemies still there to fight. I don’t think they want to win because if they won, their enemies would be gone and there would be no reason to have troops there anymore. How can they protect their interests, keep the circle around Iran intact and have that elusive enemy to rally the American people against if they win?
And for each day that passes, with body bags arriving home to all countries supporting this scam, with new war crimes committed by US soldiers going psycho and no real victories claimed, the unavoidable withdraw with their tails between their legs comes closer and closer.
8 years they’ve been there now, and what have they to show for it except for thousands of murdered families and a so so control of the cities?
Well, the drug trade flourishes like never before, probably fueling CIA’s pockets.
That pipeline is getting build, so that’s something, temporarily at least. An extremely large anti-American movement growing all over the world, even pro-American people like myself are almost hoping ‘terrorists’ attack the US again.
Sorry, but I need to say this to you US citizens out there, you’re starting to deserve it.
And this is, for me, probably the worst thing about this. US forces and the American establishment have alienated hundreds of millions of people that is now starting to look at Western democracy, ‘capitalism’ and consumerism as the very essence of evil. These people didn’t hate American freedom and way of life before, but they are certainly starting to do so now.
There have been so many scandals; so many crimes against humanity, war crimes and total disrespect of all things the US say they stand for that it will be almost impossible to rebuild any good reputation ever again. Most Americans doesn’t seem to understand this. Partially because the American media fail to report and dig into the stories.
America is not only losing this war they are also losing credibility and support all across the world. And this they do at the same time as they are throwing trillions of dollars into their devouring war machine, running enormous deficits, crushing their communications with air restrictions, internet laws and mad government schemes. US have a growing very uneasy population back home and a looming depression at the horizon.
This, ladies and gentlemen, is how empires die!
The only army that can be claimed to have “succeeded” to a certain degree was the one lead by Alexander the Great (327-325 B.C.). Alexander solved his conquest quandaries by applying a combination of annihilating military action whenever possible with a process of planting communities of Greek colonists in Afghanistan. In other words kill all and everyone and then move in on the place where the dead lived with people more reasonable.
Pretty much everyone else has failed miserably.
The Red Army withdrew in defeat in 1989; the USSR suffered high casualties which caused societal problems; and Moscow’s Afghan war sped the bleeding of the already dying Soviet economy. The British tried it before that and before them it was the Mughal Empire and many others.
Today we have a force of approximately 80,000 troops constituting the U.S.-led coalition. These are supposed to be an adequate force for the assigned multi-task of keeping Karzai in power and spreading democracy; creating nationwide law and order; training Kabul’s military, security, and police services; building an economy and transportation/communication infrastructure virtually from scratch; defeating al-Qaeda; eliminating the Taleban; and neutralizing the world’s most potent heroin-growers and narcotics traffickers; protect the Afghani/Pakistani border; lay the groundwork’s for oil pipelines and protect them, and much more.
Does anyone else see the stupidity here?
I can only see two possible reasons for the continuing failure and inescapable strategic and eventual moral DEFEAT of this coalition. Either the US military and its allies are so inapt and so clueless that it boggles the mind how they even manage to do anything. Or they don’t want to ‘win’.
There is no way around it; those are the only two options.
Superior airpower, massive technology and weapons advantage, trillions of dollars and the 80,000 strong (*chuckle*) coalition have managed to gain control of the Afghan cities—which each foreign invader of Afghanistan since 300 BCE has easily won—while allowing the Taleban, al-Qaeda, and their allies to flee to the Afghan mountains, Pakistan, and elsewhere to prepare to fight another day.
They should have gone all in from the start – if they wanted to win that is.
There is only one way to fight a war. You commit your nation's resources - material and the most precious of all, human - to the complete obliteration of your enemy. You mass those resources against each objective in turn, without reservation, without holding back, without care for collateral damage or world opinion. You do so until your adversary sues for peace, not because it is the political thing to do, not for expedience, but for one and only one reason: they're tired of dying. There is no "armistice" or "cease fire" in a war. There is only victory or defeat. There is only death or life.
This they didn’t do, for whatever reason. I think it is a combination of utter stupidity and the less ambitious goal of controlling the pipeline and the immediate area with enemies still there to fight. I don’t think they want to win because if they won, their enemies would be gone and there would be no reason to have troops there anymore. How can they protect their interests, keep the circle around Iran intact and have that elusive enemy to rally the American people against if they win?
And for each day that passes, with body bags arriving home to all countries supporting this scam, with new war crimes committed by US soldiers going psycho and no real victories claimed, the unavoidable withdraw with their tails between their legs comes closer and closer.
8 years they’ve been there now, and what have they to show for it except for thousands of murdered families and a so so control of the cities?
Well, the drug trade flourishes like never before, probably fueling CIA’s pockets.
That pipeline is getting build, so that’s something, temporarily at least. An extremely large anti-American movement growing all over the world, even pro-American people like myself are almost hoping ‘terrorists’ attack the US again.
Sorry, but I need to say this to you US citizens out there, you’re starting to deserve it.
And this is, for me, probably the worst thing about this. US forces and the American establishment have alienated hundreds of millions of people that is now starting to look at Western democracy, ‘capitalism’ and consumerism as the very essence of evil. These people didn’t hate American freedom and way of life before, but they are certainly starting to do so now.
There have been so many scandals; so many crimes against humanity, war crimes and total disrespect of all things the US say they stand for that it will be almost impossible to rebuild any good reputation ever again. Most Americans doesn’t seem to understand this. Partially because the American media fail to report and dig into the stories.
America is not only losing this war they are also losing credibility and support all across the world. And this they do at the same time as they are throwing trillions of dollars into their devouring war machine, running enormous deficits, crushing their communications with air restrictions, internet laws and mad government schemes. US have a growing very uneasy population back home and a looming depression at the horizon.
This, ladies and gentlemen, is how empires die!
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
A choice between Labour and Labour
I cannot help seeing tons of similarities between Swedish and British politics. During the last Swedish general election the supposed “right-wing” party Moderaterna (Tories’ equivalent) took several steps to the left, changed their rhetoric to better suit the common man and adopted several ideas and sentences regularly used by the Social Democrats (Labour).
Even before the similarities between the supposed left and the supposed right was minimal, after that election and during this period the similarities have been even more obvious.
The inbreed devotees will of course not agree. According to the politicos there’s a huuuuuge distinction.
A 1-2% difference in taxation, one or two laws among thousands and one department less or more is what they are fighting over nowadays, but listening to spin-doctors and those closest to power the very future of the world is at stake.
What is even more distressful then the slim differences, what is really worrisome are the parts were they are in agreement. Both sides want to be member of the European Union and are happily licking boots in Brussels. Both sides want that totalitarian control-grid and CCTV everywhere. Both sides pray at the Church of Climatology. Both sides want to save the chiiildreeen and hug feminists. Both sides love Keynesian economics and have no problems throwing billions at banks and selling out our future while their serfs stumble further down into despair.
As said, the similarities with Britain are staggering.
The Tories doesn’t want to change anything, and the current Labour government is probably the worst government in the history of mankind and wants to go further down the same path.
Listening to the British debate and political discussion I cannot see any reason voting for Cameron versus voting for the cyclops. The scot is horrendously ugly and probably evil incarnate, but seen to the policies a vote for either is a wasted vote.
Or, if in doubt, check this clip out:
Okay, that was Tony the war criminal and Cameron, but you get the idea…
Even worse than that, whoever takes power are going to haft to face the worst economic disaster the British isles have faced in many centuries. There is actually only one way out of that mess and it isn’t the LabourTories way. The truth is that only the illusion of choice and democracy exist, but in reality, Brits live in a two party autocracy.
Americans can probably recognize this too, so can many people on this planet.
The mainstream statism and political correctness they have mixed with five drops of fascism, four drops of socialism and one very tiny drop of capitalism is the road pretty much everyone is on. The comparison above comes to the main ‘adversaries’ in Swedish politics are applicable everywhere.
No wonder a depression awaits us.
A leftie would probably argue that Labour/social democrats /The Democratic Party have turn towards the middle, become more ‘right’ so to say. This isn’t so. In some aspects they have abandon socialism, but instead they’ve adapted much of the collectivism that we normally call ‘fascism’.
The same can be said about the supposed conservative parties.
The initial thought from both sides was probably to win the electorate and then make more gradual changes as to not scare off voters.
The problem here is twofold.
Firstly it is much easier being to the left in politics, it appeals more to the hearts of people and the rhetoric is so simple a coma patient can do it. And since they cannot only use words, they also need to act; this means that leftie policies become the winner. Secondly by moving slightly towards the middle they have adopted corporatism as a biproduct and so fascism strikes. And the longer time this goes on and the more they suck up to the righteous and politically correct, the deeper the chasm gets.
If you want change, real change, the main parties should not be your choice, in any country. Vote communist, pick the Pirate Party, UKIP, or vote libertarian - which is what you all should do. Such parties will make a difference if gaining power. Sure the communists will kill us all more quickly, but hey, a real change.
Even before the similarities between the supposed left and the supposed right was minimal, after that election and during this period the similarities have been even more obvious.
The inbreed devotees will of course not agree. According to the politicos there’s a huuuuuge distinction.
A 1-2% difference in taxation, one or two laws among thousands and one department less or more is what they are fighting over nowadays, but listening to spin-doctors and those closest to power the very future of the world is at stake.
What is even more distressful then the slim differences, what is really worrisome are the parts were they are in agreement. Both sides want to be member of the European Union and are happily licking boots in Brussels. Both sides want that totalitarian control-grid and CCTV everywhere. Both sides pray at the Church of Climatology. Both sides want to save the chiiildreeen and hug feminists. Both sides love Keynesian economics and have no problems throwing billions at banks and selling out our future while their serfs stumble further down into despair.
As said, the similarities with Britain are staggering.
The Tories doesn’t want to change anything, and the current Labour government is probably the worst government in the history of mankind and wants to go further down the same path.
Listening to the British debate and political discussion I cannot see any reason voting for Cameron versus voting for the cyclops. The scot is horrendously ugly and probably evil incarnate, but seen to the policies a vote for either is a wasted vote.
Or, if in doubt, check this clip out:
Okay, that was Tony the war criminal and Cameron, but you get the idea…
Even worse than that, whoever takes power are going to haft to face the worst economic disaster the British isles have faced in many centuries. There is actually only one way out of that mess and it isn’t the LabourTories way. The truth is that only the illusion of choice and democracy exist, but in reality, Brits live in a two party autocracy.
Americans can probably recognize this too, so can many people on this planet.
The mainstream statism and political correctness they have mixed with five drops of fascism, four drops of socialism and one very tiny drop of capitalism is the road pretty much everyone is on. The comparison above comes to the main ‘adversaries’ in Swedish politics are applicable everywhere.
No wonder a depression awaits us.
A leftie would probably argue that Labour/social democrats /The Democratic Party have turn towards the middle, become more ‘right’ so to say. This isn’t so. In some aspects they have abandon socialism, but instead they’ve adapted much of the collectivism that we normally call ‘fascism’.
The same can be said about the supposed conservative parties.
The initial thought from both sides was probably to win the electorate and then make more gradual changes as to not scare off voters.
The problem here is twofold.
Firstly it is much easier being to the left in politics, it appeals more to the hearts of people and the rhetoric is so simple a coma patient can do it. And since they cannot only use words, they also need to act; this means that leftie policies become the winner. Secondly by moving slightly towards the middle they have adopted corporatism as a biproduct and so fascism strikes. And the longer time this goes on and the more they suck up to the righteous and politically correct, the deeper the chasm gets.
If you want change, real change, the main parties should not be your choice, in any country. Vote communist, pick the Pirate Party, UKIP, or vote libertarian - which is what you all should do. Such parties will make a difference if gaining power. Sure the communists will kill us all more quickly, but hey, a real change.
Alex Jones is worth listening to
Im not a big Alex Jones follower...But the guy do have a point.
Also read my post from earlier today on about the same thing as AJ speaks on.
Also read my post from earlier today on about the same thing as AJ speaks on.
MORE WARCRIMES!!
Following the first horrific Bagdad story exposed thanks to WikiLeaks and despite the bullying from several governments, and there are even more stories are coming out. This one is more recent and equally horrific, in a way even worse since this is face to face murders and no-one is hiding behind a screen or shooting from far away.
I would like you to go to this story:
On February 12 of this year, U.S. forces entered a village in the Paktia Province in Afghanistan and, after surrounding a home where a celebration of a new birth was taking place, shot dead two male civilians (government officials) who exited the house in order to inquire why they had been surrounded, and then shot and killed three female relatives (a pregnant mother of ten, a pregnant mother of six, and a teenager).
I have checked most of the links and the facts and they all pen out. How long are the war criminals going to allowed continuing and for how long will Sweden and other countries silently stand by and let the murders take place?
AGAIN! Notice that the old media DOES NOTHING until the scandal has been exposed...
I would like you to go to this story:
On February 12 of this year, U.S. forces entered a village in the Paktia Province in Afghanistan and, after surrounding a home where a celebration of a new birth was taking place, shot dead two male civilians (government officials) who exited the house in order to inquire why they had been surrounded, and then shot and killed three female relatives (a pregnant mother of ten, a pregnant mother of six, and a teenager).
I have checked most of the links and the facts and they all pen out. How long are the war criminals going to allowed continuing and for how long will Sweden and other countries silently stand by and let the murders take place?
AGAIN! Notice that the old media DOES NOTHING until the scandal has been exposed...
THIS IS A DOCUMENT OF A WARCRIME!
This is a partly stolen post from the head of the Pirate Party in Sweden. I thought he formulated the whole murdering incident in a really good way and wanted to share that in English.
Yesterdays big topic (with maybe the US media as exception) was the video of attack helicopters in Bagdad that WikiLeaks had decrypted and published. This video shows what authorities want to censor and control the internet. This particular video the US have gone extreme lengths to stop from airing.
The video can be found here on YouTube and show how two pilots in Bagdad see eight men calmly walking down the street. Two of them are reporters from Reuters and has cameras thrown over their backs. “Weapons, they are armed”, one pilot says when he sees this calm bunch of men walking and talking to each other. “Request permission to fire”. And then one helicopter starts to fire at the group.
Afterwards the pilots laugh and admire their progress.
However, Bagdad is seemingly not without caring people. Some people in a minivan detects that there are a lot of dead and injured people further down the street and starts to look for survivors presumably to get them to a hospital.
In the van two children are detectable.
The pilot request permission to fire again. This time at the van and the merciful helpers.
He then fires.
Then they laugh again.
A bit later when hearing there are injured children at the site the comment heard is: “Well, that’s their own damn fault for bringing kids to a battle.”
I’ve also seen some writers online saying the same thing. One of the ‘excuses’ for this atrocity. If you live in Bagdad, aren’t you supposed to have children? They were probably out shopping for food that don’t exist, driving to the blown-up school or just happened to pass by and wanted to help the wounded. Do you drive the children home first and then come back to help?
This happened back in 2007 and the American military have all along claimed that this was insurgents that opened fire at the chopper. This we now know is a deliberate lie.
THIS IS A DOCUMENT OF A WARCRIME!
You could argue that it is possible to mistake a bunch of men for enemies. But when they are calmly walking down the street talking to each other very much in the open?
And you cannot mistake the eagerness to kill and then the sheer joy of the slaughter. Do US military personnel have quotas to meet? That’s the question I ask myself. It feels like a very sick computer game with bloodthirsty drunken thugs doing the shooting.
But okay, let’s play devil’s advocate for a moment. Let’s say this first bit is an honest mistake, I hardly see how, but let’s say so. After all shit happens in wars, especially in wars that are highly questionable in the first place. This isn’t the first time reporters or innocent get killed, and it won’t be the last.
What happens after the first shooting is however in no way a mistake.
You can clearly see unarmed people trying to help wounded. You can also clearly see people moving inside the van. Maybe not so clearly that it is children (you do if you look closely), but they certainly don’t look male or armed. There’s no reason to fire, no reason at all. And clearly stated in the Geneva Convention it says that unarmed, or incapacitated and wounded, red cross personnel (or similar) should not be fired upon.
This is a war crime. On tape. That the US military and government wanted to keep secret.
Without a free internet this would never have come to your attention!
This is the kind of stuff, that together with child-pornography, would be (and are) the first things to get censured.
Survivors of child molestation rarely want censorship, this for the very same reason as the families of these murdered people. Censorship allows governments to sweep such things, and much more, under the rug. Hiding it away from scrutiny. They can then claim they have done something, and the ‘problem’ isn’t as visible anymore. But still there, now harder to get at.
A free internet makes it much tougher for governments to get away with war crimes. It makes it harder for them to get away with scandals and corruption. A free internet is required to make governments, the very same governments that want to censor internet, liable and hold accountable for corruption and cover-ups.
With this in mind is it any wonder that authorities make house calls to WikiLeaks and tries to stop them from publishing their videos and findings?
I would personally go so far to say that without a free internet, we have no democracy. This is what at stake and if you haven’t figured that out before, I hope you have now.
The people on this picture have three seconds left to live.
Yesterdays big topic (with maybe the US media as exception) was the video of attack helicopters in Bagdad that WikiLeaks had decrypted and published. This video shows what authorities want to censor and control the internet. This particular video the US have gone extreme lengths to stop from airing.
The video can be found here on YouTube and show how two pilots in Bagdad see eight men calmly walking down the street. Two of them are reporters from Reuters and has cameras thrown over their backs. “Weapons, they are armed”, one pilot says when he sees this calm bunch of men walking and talking to each other. “Request permission to fire”. And then one helicopter starts to fire at the group.
Afterwards the pilots laugh and admire their progress.
However, Bagdad is seemingly not without caring people. Some people in a minivan detects that there are a lot of dead and injured people further down the street and starts to look for survivors presumably to get them to a hospital.
In the van two children are detectable.
The pilot request permission to fire again. This time at the van and the merciful helpers.
He then fires.
Then they laugh again.
A bit later when hearing there are injured children at the site the comment heard is: “Well, that’s their own damn fault for bringing kids to a battle.”
I’ve also seen some writers online saying the same thing. One of the ‘excuses’ for this atrocity. If you live in Bagdad, aren’t you supposed to have children? They were probably out shopping for food that don’t exist, driving to the blown-up school or just happened to pass by and wanted to help the wounded. Do you drive the children home first and then come back to help?
This happened back in 2007 and the American military have all along claimed that this was insurgents that opened fire at the chopper. This we now know is a deliberate lie.
THIS IS A DOCUMENT OF A WARCRIME!
You could argue that it is possible to mistake a bunch of men for enemies. But when they are calmly walking down the street talking to each other very much in the open?
And you cannot mistake the eagerness to kill and then the sheer joy of the slaughter. Do US military personnel have quotas to meet? That’s the question I ask myself. It feels like a very sick computer game with bloodthirsty drunken thugs doing the shooting.
But okay, let’s play devil’s advocate for a moment. Let’s say this first bit is an honest mistake, I hardly see how, but let’s say so. After all shit happens in wars, especially in wars that are highly questionable in the first place. This isn’t the first time reporters or innocent get killed, and it won’t be the last.
What happens after the first shooting is however in no way a mistake.
You can clearly see unarmed people trying to help wounded. You can also clearly see people moving inside the van. Maybe not so clearly that it is children (you do if you look closely), but they certainly don’t look male or armed. There’s no reason to fire, no reason at all. And clearly stated in the Geneva Convention it says that unarmed, or incapacitated and wounded, red cross personnel (or similar) should not be fired upon.
This is a war crime. On tape. That the US military and government wanted to keep secret.
Without a free internet this would never have come to your attention!
This is the kind of stuff, that together with child-pornography, would be (and are) the first things to get censured.
Survivors of child molestation rarely want censorship, this for the very same reason as the families of these murdered people. Censorship allows governments to sweep such things, and much more, under the rug. Hiding it away from scrutiny. They can then claim they have done something, and the ‘problem’ isn’t as visible anymore. But still there, now harder to get at.
A free internet makes it much tougher for governments to get away with war crimes. It makes it harder for them to get away with scandals and corruption. A free internet is required to make governments, the very same governments that want to censor internet, liable and hold accountable for corruption and cover-ups.
With this in mind is it any wonder that authorities make house calls to WikiLeaks and tries to stop them from publishing their videos and findings?
I would personally go so far to say that without a free internet, we have no democracy. This is what at stake and if you haven’t figured that out before, I hope you have now.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)














