Finally the UN reports of the impending starvation disaster in Eastern Africa, something I have been talking about for a year now. BBC reporting.
And it is not just the 20 million or so people in the Horn of Africa, there are many other countries as you can, among other places, read in this post from 1may: Nowish.
Trade numbers continues down, real life pirates are increasing, and the depression keeps going. I predicted almost a year ago that we would see death tolls in the tens of millions within a couple of years, it seems like the UN is finally catching on. Bloody useless idiots.
Maybe you think this is far away and don’t affect your life? Think again, food shortage will come our way down the line.
Started to stack up on those cans and dried-up food packages yet? Better start…
Thursday, September 24, 2009
Were are u normal people?
Don’t let the anarchists and lefties steal the show, it’s you, the regular Joe’s out there that should get up and get out. Our enemies and the media need to know that normal people are feed up and despise the power elite.
G20 fascist protectors use tear gas and sonic weapons against protesting fascists(mostly, some good people as well). Oh, this weekend is going to be so fun...
One of several post from the Alex Jones show:
resistance is futile you will be assimilated
G20 fascist protectors use tear gas and sonic weapons against protesting fascists(mostly, some good people as well). Oh, this weekend is going to be so fun...
One of several post from the Alex Jones show:
resistance is futile you will be assimilated
“You most leave the immediate vicinity…”
Haha… I love internet. No wonder our enemies want to destroy the free media, you can follow the G20 demonstration, live, directly; listen to police announcements and hearing them trashing things.
THIS IS WANT THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO BE ABLE TO DO!
IT’S ABOUT CONTROL!
This is why they want to control internet.
How can they ever control us if we can watch and follow things like this directly like you are there? They can’t.
Again, this cannot be told enough times:
THIS IS WANT THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO BE ABLE TO DO!
EDIT: the live feed in the link is down at the moment, but you can still listen to re-runs.
There are lots of places, Go to twitter, or listen here:
Infowars
THIS IS WANT THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO BE ABLE TO DO!
IT’S ABOUT CONTROL!
This is why they want to control internet.
How can they ever control us if we can watch and follow things like this directly like you are there? They can’t.
Again, this cannot be told enough times:
THIS IS WANT THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO BE ABLE TO DO!
EDIT: the live feed in the link is down at the moment, but you can still listen to re-runs.
There are lots of places, Go to twitter, or listen here:
Infowars
First demonstrations at G20
The first funnies at the G20 have just passed through. The police and military seem to be very ready for demonstrators.
According to some free media people, they are using sound-weapons. Sounds fantastic!
More will likely follow…
According to some free media people, they are using sound-weapons. Sounds fantastic!
More will likely follow…
This weekend will be so funny
Tomorrow, Friday 25th of September 2009, HR 1207, the Federal Reserve Transparency Act, and S 604, the Federal Reserve Sunshine Act, will have an official hearing. Later on, as it looks now, it will pass and consequently a full audit of the Fed will happen for the first time in its history and would provide answers to the American people about how our money is being spent.
Of course we can already figure out what is going to take place during the G20. Mass media will focus on some “controversy” such as Gorgon Brownie saying something stupid (wouldn’t that be a first..?) or a couple of countries arguing over something like tariffs. At the same time our lazy journalists focus on such none-events and other idiocies like some pretty “good headway” regarding the environment, the real decisions will go by pretty unnoticed in the background or, at the most, pass by as a text or small additions in the reporting. Two such hidden agendas I aspect them to cover behind closed curtains is internet regulations and the Swine Flu. More regulations and more government cooperation’s will come out of it, and most likely a follow up to the international swine flu conference, especially now when they are pretending to have navy ships in quarantine. Just ridiculous.
The statism idea of balanced global economy plus what they will decide regarding the dollar will most likely condemn millions of people to starvation and is an absolute guarantee that the next bump on this depression road is just around the corner.
Of course we can already figure out what is going to take place during the G20. Mass media will focus on some “controversy” such as Gorgon Brownie saying something stupid (wouldn’t that be a first..?) or a couple of countries arguing over something like tariffs. At the same time our lazy journalists focus on such none-events and other idiocies like some pretty “good headway” regarding the environment, the real decisions will go by pretty unnoticed in the background or, at the most, pass by as a text or small additions in the reporting. The statism idea of balanced global economy plus what they will decide regarding the dollar will most likely condemn millions of people to starvation and is an absolute guarantee that the next bump on this depression road is just around the corner.
The Audit-the-fed situation is actually harder to predict - all things point to this passing through to all levels and potentially lead to an audit and a final exposure of what those banksters have been up to. However, it is hard to see how those very powerful and very wealthy individuals would just give up, that will not happen. So just as the last time around in the 70s I’m guessing some kind of agreement will be made. Senator Chris Dodd's plan to create a super agency to oversee the whole swindle, in affect take one regulatory authority away from one unaccountable institution and gives it to another even bigger one, is a very likely outcome. But until that happens we will probably see a long time of legal trickery.
Of course we can already figure out what is going to take place during the G20. Mass media will focus on some “controversy” such as Gorgon Brownie saying something stupid (wouldn’t that be a first..?) or a couple of countries arguing over something like tariffs. At the same time our lazy journalists focus on such none-events and other idiocies like some pretty “good headway” regarding the environment, the real decisions will go by pretty unnoticed in the background or, at the most, pass by as a text or small additions in the reporting. Two such hidden agendas I aspect them to cover behind closed curtains is internet regulations and the Swine Flu. More regulations and more government cooperation’s will come out of it, and most likely a follow up to the international swine flu conference, especially now when they are pretending to have navy ships in quarantine. Just ridiculous.
The statism idea of balanced global economy plus what they will decide regarding the dollar will most likely condemn millions of people to starvation and is an absolute guarantee that the next bump on this depression road is just around the corner.
Of course we can already figure out what is going to take place during the G20. Mass media will focus on some “controversy” such as Gorgon Brownie saying something stupid (wouldn’t that be a first..?) or a couple of countries arguing over something like tariffs. At the same time our lazy journalists focus on such none-events and other idiocies like some pretty “good headway” regarding the environment, the real decisions will go by pretty unnoticed in the background or, at the most, pass by as a text or small additions in the reporting. The statism idea of balanced global economy plus what they will decide regarding the dollar will most likely condemn millions of people to starvation and is an absolute guarantee that the next bump on this depression road is just around the corner.
The Audit-the-fed situation is actually harder to predict - all things point to this passing through to all levels and potentially lead to an audit and a final exposure of what those banksters have been up to. However, it is hard to see how those very powerful and very wealthy individuals would just give up, that will not happen. So just as the last time around in the 70s I’m guessing some kind of agreement will be made. Senator Chris Dodd's plan to create a super agency to oversee the whole swindle, in affect take one regulatory authority away from one unaccountable institution and gives it to another even bigger one, is a very likely outcome. But until that happens we will probably see a long time of legal trickery.
Who owns your body?
This question make out the very center peace of all things discussed about society, economics and politics. Almost everything you can think of that has one or several political or philosophical viewpoints comes back to the fundamental question of corporal ownership.
Whose responsibility is it to care for, decide over and have authority over your body?
If we assume the position of pro government on this question, which most of you do, we automatically say that government must have the power to approve or withhold drugs, healthcare or no healthcare, sex or no sex. In fact, governments supersede anything you can or want to do with your very existence. Take such a thing as your death. Sure you can decide some stuff surrounding your funeral that the state have allowed you to, but you cannot spread your ashes wherever, funeral services need to be kept within certain boundaries and even your headstone can be subjected to some debate. At any moment some or all of this may change, it only takes a whim from certain officials, a change in the law or some important lobby-group to alter how we conduct funeral services.
Your birth is almost totally controlled. Although a slight difference between countries, most of us do give birth at public hospitals, get a publicly recognized social security number, we get to be enlisted into several programs and written onto lists even before delivery, we do check-ups, get vaccinations and so on, all curtsey of state officials.
This goes on and on and the examples are endless.
However, one issue kind of stands out, the issue of sex. Maybe you think you can fuck whomever, whenever, in whatever way you please. Think again.
Government and laws may dictate that certain acts of sex are to depraved for us mere mortals to perform. And I’m not taking about necrophilia, bestiality, pedophilia or different sorts of rape. There are many countries or states that also have outlawed homosexuality, analsex, oralsex or even masturbation. But even if we leave those topics we end up in very arbitrary rules regarding age and places. The age for consent varies with everything from 12 years up to 21 years, depending on country, religion and so on. Most (all) countries have harsh penalties for performing sexual acts in public, but even if we ignore the act itself, only the showing of flesh may get you thrown in jail, in some countries even executed.
All the things mentioned can be argued around, debated through notions of religiosity, feminism, psychology and so forth, but how about apparent adults having “normal” sex? Surely such act is up to the individuals? Nah, not at all.
If we ignore massive campaigns about AIDS, hepatitis, getting forced to pay for publicly distributed condoms and such inventive schemes as government allocated funds paid for each child, we still end up with government saying you cannot have sex with whomever during whatever agreement. For instance you cannot charge your companion, no matter how good you have been. Even if the best orgasm is reached during the best sex of a lifetime, no money can ever exchange hands, because then you are a criminal. This goes even if you know each other or even are long time companions, no money. You can pay for dinner, drinks, pay for the movie, buy an expensive gift, and then “lure” you’re attended into bed, but there cannot be an explicit thought of payment for sex behind it all.
It does not matter if you are old enough and rational enough to make own decisions, the choice of what to do with your body isn’t yours. In a moral world with free people living within the confines of a democratic state that protects human rights, your choice would be final, you would be your own king. Accepting payment for sex should be an individual option, but it’s not.
So ask yourself, if you are not the one deciding over your own body, if the situation of your very being is that of servitude or as the property of the state, what does that make you?
Whose responsibility is it to care for, decide over and have authority over your body?
If we assume the position of pro government on this question, which most of you do, we automatically say that government must have the power to approve or withhold drugs, healthcare or no healthcare, sex or no sex. In fact, governments supersede anything you can or want to do with your very existence. Take such a thing as your death. Sure you can decide some stuff surrounding your funeral that the state have allowed you to, but you cannot spread your ashes wherever, funeral services need to be kept within certain boundaries and even your headstone can be subjected to some debate. At any moment some or all of this may change, it only takes a whim from certain officials, a change in the law or some important lobby-group to alter how we conduct funeral services.
Your birth is almost totally controlled. Although a slight difference between countries, most of us do give birth at public hospitals, get a publicly recognized social security number, we get to be enlisted into several programs and written onto lists even before delivery, we do check-ups, get vaccinations and so on, all curtsey of state officials.
This goes on and on and the examples are endless.
However, one issue kind of stands out, the issue of sex. Maybe you think you can fuck whomever, whenever, in whatever way you please. Think again.
Government and laws may dictate that certain acts of sex are to depraved for us mere mortals to perform. And I’m not taking about necrophilia, bestiality, pedophilia or different sorts of rape. There are many countries or states that also have outlawed homosexuality, analsex, oralsex or even masturbation. But even if we leave those topics we end up in very arbitrary rules regarding age and places. The age for consent varies with everything from 12 years up to 21 years, depending on country, religion and so on. Most (all) countries have harsh penalties for performing sexual acts in public, but even if we ignore the act itself, only the showing of flesh may get you thrown in jail, in some countries even executed.
All the things mentioned can be argued around, debated through notions of religiosity, feminism, psychology and so forth, but how about apparent adults having “normal” sex? Surely such act is up to the individuals? Nah, not at all.
If we ignore massive campaigns about AIDS, hepatitis, getting forced to pay for publicly distributed condoms and such inventive schemes as government allocated funds paid for each child, we still end up with government saying you cannot have sex with whomever during whatever agreement. For instance you cannot charge your companion, no matter how good you have been. Even if the best orgasm is reached during the best sex of a lifetime, no money can ever exchange hands, because then you are a criminal. This goes even if you know each other or even are long time companions, no money. You can pay for dinner, drinks, pay for the movie, buy an expensive gift, and then “lure” you’re attended into bed, but there cannot be an explicit thought of payment for sex behind it all.
It does not matter if you are old enough and rational enough to make own decisions, the choice of what to do with your body isn’t yours. In a moral world with free people living within the confines of a democratic state that protects human rights, your choice would be final, you would be your own king. Accepting payment for sex should be an individual option, but it’s not.
So ask yourself, if you are not the one deciding over your own body, if the situation of your very being is that of servitude or as the property of the state, what does that make you?
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Muammar Gaddafi
After listening to normal politicians for a long while, I took a break, well, sort of, and listened to Muammar Gaddafi, the Libyan leader. Any normal elected fraud I usually listen to is either totally lying or have not a clue about whatever the topic is. It is too bad that Gaddafi mixes some truths with totally idiotic claims and praises of the Obamination, otherwise he would actually be one of the better ones out there, if ignoring the dictatorship thingy that is.
Despite being a dictator and an obvious madman, I cannot help feeling some freshness from a man not totally lying to a point of 100%. This man actually made some relevant remarks regarding the UN charter. Among other things; blasted the U.N. Security Council as an elitist organization that favors superpowers over small nations, he urged investigations of U.S. military activities, and he suggested the rest of the world to give America a break and move the United Nations elsewhere, such as Beijing or New Delhi. He also said that despite the fact that the United Nations says there should be no resorting to military force unless it is a collective decision, 65 wars broke out after the establishment of the United Nations, and the Security Council didn't do anything to stop the conflicts.
Just to mention some relevant points I agree with.
Reading Swedish papers quoting the speech, it’s obvious, as usual, that not a single journalists writing about it have actually watched it, instead picked up some ramblings of a single reporter sending the same crap to everyone. It’s available on YouTube you morons, if I can find the time to watch the speech without getting paid for it, so can you.
This is an important event and lots of fun things is going on, why don’t the old-media papers send out reporters or at least have someone covering it?
Despite being a dictator and an obvious madman, I cannot help feeling some freshness from a man not totally lying to a point of 100%. This man actually made some relevant remarks regarding the UN charter. Among other things; blasted the U.N. Security Council as an elitist organization that favors superpowers over small nations, he urged investigations of U.S. military activities, and he suggested the rest of the world to give America a break and move the United Nations elsewhere, such as Beijing or New Delhi. He also said that despite the fact that the United Nations says there should be no resorting to military force unless it is a collective decision, 65 wars broke out after the establishment of the United Nations, and the Security Council didn't do anything to stop the conflicts.
Just to mention some relevant points I agree with.
Reading Swedish papers quoting the speech, it’s obvious, as usual, that not a single journalists writing about it have actually watched it, instead picked up some ramblings of a single reporter sending the same crap to everyone. It’s available on YouTube you morons, if I can find the time to watch the speech without getting paid for it, so can you.
This is an important event and lots of fun things is going on, why don’t the old-media papers send out reporters or at least have someone covering it?
From the horse's mouth
Apparently, according to Swedish press, a clear statement from the opposition leader for the Social democrats in Sweden was issued today - the fascist laws regarding internet that have turned my birth nation into a none-democratic zoon will stay in place. Well, she argued that the STASI-authority-act would be replaced with other “better regulations”, but most of it would stay just as it is. Apparently the opposition is in agreement on this, in other words only the Pirate Party remains for those who wants some integrity and democracy. So much for the Green Party and the communist’s declaration of bringing back personal freedom.
Good news for the pirates, I’m guessing a 1-2% climb on the polls from this one.
Good news for the pirates, I’m guessing a 1-2% climb on the polls from this one.
This is not a joke, I will kill you
I know I sometimes speak of using violence in order to shrug of our oppressors, most of the time that is rhetoric to point out our dilemma, this is one of those “over the top” –blogs after all. However, everyone that knows me can tell ya I’m a puppy and that I’m not a violent person. But there is a limit, even for a soft-minded Swede as myself.
This would be my limit:
I can tell you all right now, if anyone try to inoculate me, by force, with a vaccine, for the Swine-flu or whatever; I’ll put up a hell of a fight. And if anyone does anything to my child or any of my relatives, I’ll go on a killing rampage knocking off any authority I can find.
This is not a joke.
I don’t think the Swedish government nor very few others would impose such a law, but if they ever do, this is a warning, and I know I’m not alone.
This may very well be the last straw for many Americans, so IF this law and similar ones goes into actual usage, I aspect dead politicians, dead police and many dead citizens in the near future.
This would be my limit:
I can tell you all right now, if anyone try to inoculate me, by force, with a vaccine, for the Swine-flu or whatever; I’ll put up a hell of a fight. And if anyone does anything to my child or any of my relatives, I’ll go on a killing rampage knocking off any authority I can find.
This is not a joke.
I don’t think the Swedish government nor very few others would impose such a law, but if they ever do, this is a warning, and I know I’m not alone.
This may very well be the last straw for many Americans, so IF this law and similar ones goes into actual usage, I aspect dead politicians, dead police and many dead citizens in the near future.
“Buffy” pushes out the next generation
Sarah Michelle Gellar has given birth to her first child - a little girl, to be named Charlotte Grace Prinze. The news don’t really convey whether or not the “slayer” used epidural, but in either case the bun in the oven is now out in the open, happily screaming and keeping her parents awake at night.
I can’t wait for this girl to grow up and follow her mother’s steps to become the next guardian of the hell-mouth. It is usual in Hollywood to walk the line of earlier acting-generation, so I hope so. And let’s hope Joss is still alive and kicking 15-16 years down the line as well.
From the series when Buffy… uhm… test something new that shouldn't lead to any babies...
I can’t wait for this girl to grow up and follow her mother’s steps to become the next guardian of the hell-mouth. It is usual in Hollywood to walk the line of earlier acting-generation, so I hope so. And let’s hope Joss is still alive and kicking 15-16 years down the line as well.
From the series when Buffy… uhm… test something new that shouldn't lead to any babies...
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Don’t discard the possibility of being taken
Looking around my fellow bloggers I stumbled upon this post by leg-iron, writing almost about the same as my current thinking, but I need to put in a disclaimer. Just because you're (or aren’t...) paranoid, doesn’t mean they aren’t out to get you.
There is no secret that the high and mighty are trying to impose different sorts of control of the internet. You don’t need to be a conspiracist to see the urinating against the wall, forming words like “monitoring”, “surveillance”, and “punishment”. Those in charge have never been so exposed before, it’s an unprecedented situation where anyone can find information, post it online and form opinions. MPs, banksters, tricksters and even journalists are under a giant thumb of scrutiny and the slightest step in the wrong direction may very well end a carrier or put a stop to a program. Whereas the elitists have had not only information monopoly, but also the right to first interpretation of news, they now come in second at best.
Of course they need to fight back.
There isn’t a single reasonably thinking individual that falls for the talk about stopping terrorists or protecting children from pedophiles, we know that’s ridiculous.
If a single really dangerous terrorist get caught by government reading our emails, it would be the biggest surprise of a lifetime.
Another usual argument is that drugs and bomb-making have been made more easily available now that people are just clicks away from such things. This is, of course, also mixed with the “won’t someone please think of the children” – argument. Like access to drugs or information on how to make things go boom haven’t been available before. I have known how to make a bomb since I got pubis-hair, any decent terrorist-attack-USA-movie may contain such information, and libraries are filled with books on the subject. Why aren’t they hindering youngsters from entering libraries? And drugs? Please. There isn’t a single person on this planet more than two phone calls away from any drug you can think of.
The economic argument of protecting certain industries from online-piracy, illegal copying and free distribution, is also a false one. The same arguments from the very same people have been made before when the radio emerged, when TV got to be everyman’s property, and when MTV materialize in the ether. But we don’t even need to look at music and information spread, go read about ‘spinning-jenny’ or what happened when light-bulbs got into production. Anti-technology groups have always existed, arguing about job-losses, effects on the environment or other maddening claims.
A funny side-note, speaking of the light-bulb, there now exist a black-market for light-bulbs since the EU managed to ban that product. How funny isn’t that? And since China are imposing tariffs on several metals used for many of the alternatives, that black-market will probably flourish.
Anyway, back to the notion of government doing us over online, it is not hard to imagine regular bans of critical or “over the top” information sites. We have already heard elitists saying that certain blogs are a nuisance, we have read about suggestion that blogs should be registered, and that new government entities should "rate" such sites. It has even been suggested that certain “radical elements” ought to be totally banned, forcing internet-suppliers, whom work with the consent of government, to cut those elements off. To no surprise it’s mainly libertarian and communist blogs getting the main thrashing, but the leap over to ban any form of critic-blog isn’t really far.
Interesting enough, many purely information-sites are also under investigation.
Medical information-sites, for instance, have been criticized lately since many of those argue against swine-flu vaccinations, “tricking” people to not believe in the scaremongering of WHO and maybe even questioning the very content of the vaccine. I read an article today about nurses and doctors in a US-state going to rally against forced inoculations for health-personnel. One of the negative comments from an authority figure was directly aimed at the “alternative” viewpoint being told from doctors online.
With this in mind it makes the old-media talk about making you pay for news online very self-explanatory.
It also makes this recent statement from the American President fully explained:
“I am concerned that if the direction of the news is all blogosphere, all opinions, with no serious fact-checking, no serious attempts to put stories in context, that what you will end up getting is people shouting at each other across the void but not a lot of mutual understanding,”
In my opinion it’s just a matter of time.
Certain political parties and some citizens complaining about this direction will not hinder the pending end-result. As with any from on high proposal you can stop some of the content or make them take another path, but in the end the elitists will emerge victorious. If they cannot block a certain blog, with some pesky law or public opinion in the way, they will just work around it by subsidizing internet suppliers that do not have critical voices, restrict access to government information or create a new law (read: “patriot-act”) to supersede the old laws. The only thing in the way is the imagination of those in charge, and comes to protecting themselves and their cronies; imagination doesn’t come in short supply.
Another thing that is just a matter of time before it pops up, in one form or the other, is ways of discredit certain individuals or opinions, which we already have seen happen.
Just as Leg-iron I’m not very worried about myself or about any other critical voice for being picked up and thrown in jail for no reason, and I don’t really care about that dossier the Swedish Secret police have on me or the fact that FBI have visited my blog on several occasions. However, there are other ways for the thought-police to conjure up charges or lay hinder in the way of critic.
Maybe your blog have been visited by a well known criminal gang, and didn’t you know a drug-dealer in collage? What about that photograph of a naked lady you watched yesterday? Wasn’t she underage? And putting up pictures of your child bathing? You pedophile you. Don’t you make money of your blog? Maybe the IRS should knock on your door. Aren’t you using too many profanities? That is surely enough reason to block your site at schools, public libraries and such. Did a person die from not taking a vaccine after reading your blog? How about liability for that?
Again, only the imagination is in the way of making up such accusations.
So I’m not worried per se, however, I do see a future where incriminating “evidence”, new laws and other ingenious plots emerging on the scene, doing the same thing, but in a different way.
Our great leaders are well on the way of creating the sort of Orwellian nightmare any old STASI-commander would drool over. And with all this power in their hands, they will use it - you can be absolute sure about that.
But maybe the most interesting part of all this, is the state of the economy in relation to information. There are so many people being heard all over the world saying the truth about how grim our financial situation is and how the future really looks, pointing to the real criminals whom are still roaming free. Looking around you can find lots of real facts contradicting anything the power elitists say. So it is not hard to not to put this in relation to the growing monitoring and impending control of alternative sources.
I would claim that the two are completely linked to each other.
The worse our economy becomes the worse command functions will be imposed regarding internet. The more crises’ materializing, the more they want to control the information. In fact, I would go so far to say that before the next big economic blow-out we will see totalitarian laws and restrictions - as we have in China, Iran, and recently, in France. This is also why I expect G20 and the EU to hurry things along, because the real tsunami wave of the depression is not far from hitting the shoreline.
Don’t let them stop the signal, and don’t believe for a second that they cannot stop internet entirely, they will find a way if needed, this you can also be absolutely sure of. It’s all a matter of time.
There is no secret that the high and mighty are trying to impose different sorts of control of the internet. You don’t need to be a conspiracist to see the urinating against the wall, forming words like “monitoring”, “surveillance”, and “punishment”. Those in charge have never been so exposed before, it’s an unprecedented situation where anyone can find information, post it online and form opinions. MPs, banksters, tricksters and even journalists are under a giant thumb of scrutiny and the slightest step in the wrong direction may very well end a carrier or put a stop to a program. Whereas the elitists have had not only information monopoly, but also the right to first interpretation of news, they now come in second at best.
Of course they need to fight back.
There isn’t a single reasonably thinking individual that falls for the talk about stopping terrorists or protecting children from pedophiles, we know that’s ridiculous.
If a single really dangerous terrorist get caught by government reading our emails, it would be the biggest surprise of a lifetime.
Another usual argument is that drugs and bomb-making have been made more easily available now that people are just clicks away from such things. This is, of course, also mixed with the “won’t someone please think of the children” – argument. Like access to drugs or information on how to make things go boom haven’t been available before. I have known how to make a bomb since I got pubis-hair, any decent terrorist-attack-USA-movie may contain such information, and libraries are filled with books on the subject. Why aren’t they hindering youngsters from entering libraries? And drugs? Please. There isn’t a single person on this planet more than two phone calls away from any drug you can think of.
The economic argument of protecting certain industries from online-piracy, illegal copying and free distribution, is also a false one. The same arguments from the very same people have been made before when the radio emerged, when TV got to be everyman’s property, and when MTV materialize in the ether. But we don’t even need to look at music and information spread, go read about ‘spinning-jenny’ or what happened when light-bulbs got into production. Anti-technology groups have always existed, arguing about job-losses, effects on the environment or other maddening claims.
A funny side-note, speaking of the light-bulb, there now exist a black-market for light-bulbs since the EU managed to ban that product. How funny isn’t that? And since China are imposing tariffs on several metals used for many of the alternatives, that black-market will probably flourish.
Anyway, back to the notion of government doing us over online, it is not hard to imagine regular bans of critical or “over the top” information sites. We have already heard elitists saying that certain blogs are a nuisance, we have read about suggestion that blogs should be registered, and that new government entities should "rate" such sites. It has even been suggested that certain “radical elements” ought to be totally banned, forcing internet-suppliers, whom work with the consent of government, to cut those elements off. To no surprise it’s mainly libertarian and communist blogs getting the main thrashing, but the leap over to ban any form of critic-blog isn’t really far.
Interesting enough, many purely information-sites are also under investigation.
Medical information-sites, for instance, have been criticized lately since many of those argue against swine-flu vaccinations, “tricking” people to not believe in the scaremongering of WHO and maybe even questioning the very content of the vaccine. I read an article today about nurses and doctors in a US-state going to rally against forced inoculations for health-personnel. One of the negative comments from an authority figure was directly aimed at the “alternative” viewpoint being told from doctors online.
With this in mind it makes the old-media talk about making you pay for news online very self-explanatory.
It also makes this recent statement from the American President fully explained:
“I am concerned that if the direction of the news is all blogosphere, all opinions, with no serious fact-checking, no serious attempts to put stories in context, that what you will end up getting is people shouting at each other across the void but not a lot of mutual understanding,”
In my opinion it’s just a matter of time.
Certain political parties and some citizens complaining about this direction will not hinder the pending end-result. As with any from on high proposal you can stop some of the content or make them take another path, but in the end the elitists will emerge victorious. If they cannot block a certain blog, with some pesky law or public opinion in the way, they will just work around it by subsidizing internet suppliers that do not have critical voices, restrict access to government information or create a new law (read: “patriot-act”) to supersede the old laws. The only thing in the way is the imagination of those in charge, and comes to protecting themselves and their cronies; imagination doesn’t come in short supply.
Another thing that is just a matter of time before it pops up, in one form or the other, is ways of discredit certain individuals or opinions, which we already have seen happen.
Just as Leg-iron I’m not very worried about myself or about any other critical voice for being picked up and thrown in jail for no reason, and I don’t really care about that dossier the Swedish Secret police have on me or the fact that FBI have visited my blog on several occasions. However, there are other ways for the thought-police to conjure up charges or lay hinder in the way of critic.
Maybe your blog have been visited by a well known criminal gang, and didn’t you know a drug-dealer in collage? What about that photograph of a naked lady you watched yesterday? Wasn’t she underage? And putting up pictures of your child bathing? You pedophile you. Don’t you make money of your blog? Maybe the IRS should knock on your door. Aren’t you using too many profanities? That is surely enough reason to block your site at schools, public libraries and such. Did a person die from not taking a vaccine after reading your blog? How about liability for that?
Again, only the imagination is in the way of making up such accusations.
So I’m not worried per se, however, I do see a future where incriminating “evidence”, new laws and other ingenious plots emerging on the scene, doing the same thing, but in a different way.
Our great leaders are well on the way of creating the sort of Orwellian nightmare any old STASI-commander would drool over. And with all this power in their hands, they will use it - you can be absolute sure about that.
But maybe the most interesting part of all this, is the state of the economy in relation to information. There are so many people being heard all over the world saying the truth about how grim our financial situation is and how the future really looks, pointing to the real criminals whom are still roaming free. Looking around you can find lots of real facts contradicting anything the power elitists say. So it is not hard to not to put this in relation to the growing monitoring and impending control of alternative sources.
I would claim that the two are completely linked to each other.
The worse our economy becomes the worse command functions will be imposed regarding internet. The more crises’ materializing, the more they want to control the information. In fact, I would go so far to say that before the next big economic blow-out we will see totalitarian laws and restrictions - as we have in China, Iran, and recently, in France. This is also why I expect G20 and the EU to hurry things along, because the real tsunami wave of the depression is not far from hitting the shoreline.
Don’t let them stop the signal, and don’t believe for a second that they cannot stop internet entirely, they will find a way if needed, this you can also be absolutely sure of. It’s all a matter of time.
Beyond anything cartoonish
My BS detection device is up and running and working to its full capacity this evening, although just hours ago I thought the news were kind of boring. I went away from my computer for a couple of hours, got back, and lord and behold, so much BS I don’t even know where to start.
Well, let’s pick off with those hilarious tricksters at the G20.
Seldom have our enemies shown their true colors in brighter fashion than during the last couple of years, and at the very pinnacle we can find froggy Nicolas Paul Stéphane Sárközy de Nagy-Bócsa, the Obamination of the US, Gordon “I’m the worst leader in history” Brown and the rest of the scoundrels dining for our money at the G20 madness.
During a couple of decades we have dug ourselves into a debt crisis that according to all the facts and the simplest of mathematical equations cannot end until we change the way we do things, but in steps the madmen that are largely responsible for creating this crisis and, of course, immediately start borrowing, printing money and goes out on the mother of all spending sprees. In effect digging the hole much deeper and worsening the situation. We could have had a small depression and then been on our marry way, but nah, we cannot have that, instead we have inflated the bubbles into a final Judgment Day scenario.
So what do our great and omnipotent leaders have cooking this time? Well, the frogs are yelling about a Tobin-tax, the Chinese have just declared they too are going to follow the cerebral edema of lies that makes up “climate change” so we can expect some more schemes to cut energy usage in order for more millions of poor people to die. That no evidence of manmade climate change exist is, of course, ignored.
This week's G20 summit in the US will also call for major reforms to promote a more balanced global economy. In political language this means more politics, more regulations, and more control over us mere mortals in the hands of the übermench. A document is, apparently, suggesting that rich indebted countries, such as Britain and the US, should save more while cautious and savings-oriented nations such as Germany and China should increase spending.
Detailed average-leveled imposed doctrines in true socialist manner.
I also learned that the EU is putting together some fine little groups to “monitor” certain markets, in order to, and I quote, “See to it that no financial crisis emerges ever again”. When I saw and read this, I nearly laughed myself out of the couch. This is spectacular!
And Evil Incorporated, Goldman Sachs, is putting good use to all those stolen money they have, buying more companies. What, most likely, are the biggest robbers in the entire history of mankind, are putting all that wealth into play and buying other companies at a penny for a dollar. And since these guys, together with other fraudulent and criminal banksters, is the other big pile of masterminds that created this crisis, it makes this entire design the stuff of fiction. You couldn’t make this stuff up, its way beyond anything ever seen on the cartoon network.
During all this we also learn that the froggies have more fascist-cards to play, putting into place one of the world’s hardest internet restrictions, to some extent even surpassing dictatorial regimes. As I have stated many times over, FRA, IPRED and all the other funnies was just the beginning, when all is said and done, the internet as we know it will be no more.
I’m very happy to be alive during these years, because when potential survivors in the future are summarizing these events, they will point to all this madness and regard it as the most significant changes of human life on this planet, ever. I’m not sure whether or not the end result will be positive or not yet, probably negative, but what I am sure of is that there are very shaky and very bloody couple of years ahead of us.
Fun fun fun…
Well, let’s pick off with those hilarious tricksters at the G20.
Seldom have our enemies shown their true colors in brighter fashion than during the last couple of years, and at the very pinnacle we can find froggy Nicolas Paul Stéphane Sárközy de Nagy-Bócsa, the Obamination of the US, Gordon “I’m the worst leader in history” Brown and the rest of the scoundrels dining for our money at the G20 madness.
During a couple of decades we have dug ourselves into a debt crisis that according to all the facts and the simplest of mathematical equations cannot end until we change the way we do things, but in steps the madmen that are largely responsible for creating this crisis and, of course, immediately start borrowing, printing money and goes out on the mother of all spending sprees. In effect digging the hole much deeper and worsening the situation. We could have had a small depression and then been on our marry way, but nah, we cannot have that, instead we have inflated the bubbles into a final Judgment Day scenario.
So what do our great and omnipotent leaders have cooking this time? Well, the frogs are yelling about a Tobin-tax, the Chinese have just declared they too are going to follow the cerebral edema of lies that makes up “climate change” so we can expect some more schemes to cut energy usage in order for more millions of poor people to die. That no evidence of manmade climate change exist is, of course, ignored.
This week's G20 summit in the US will also call for major reforms to promote a more balanced global economy. In political language this means more politics, more regulations, and more control over us mere mortals in the hands of the übermench. A document is, apparently, suggesting that rich indebted countries, such as Britain and the US, should save more while cautious and savings-oriented nations such as Germany and China should increase spending.
Detailed average-leveled imposed doctrines in true socialist manner.
I also learned that the EU is putting together some fine little groups to “monitor” certain markets, in order to, and I quote, “See to it that no financial crisis emerges ever again”. When I saw and read this, I nearly laughed myself out of the couch. This is spectacular!
And Evil Incorporated, Goldman Sachs, is putting good use to all those stolen money they have, buying more companies. What, most likely, are the biggest robbers in the entire history of mankind, are putting all that wealth into play and buying other companies at a penny for a dollar. And since these guys, together with other fraudulent and criminal banksters, is the other big pile of masterminds that created this crisis, it makes this entire design the stuff of fiction. You couldn’t make this stuff up, its way beyond anything ever seen on the cartoon network.
During all this we also learn that the froggies have more fascist-cards to play, putting into place one of the world’s hardest internet restrictions, to some extent even surpassing dictatorial regimes. As I have stated many times over, FRA, IPRED and all the other funnies was just the beginning, when all is said and done, the internet as we know it will be no more.
I’m very happy to be alive during these years, because when potential survivors in the future are summarizing these events, they will point to all this madness and regard it as the most significant changes of human life on this planet, ever. I’m not sure whether or not the end result will be positive or not yet, probably negative, but what I am sure of is that there are very shaky and very bloody couple of years ahead of us.
Fun fun fun…
Monday, September 21, 2009
Do you understand economics?
Well, the headline may be more accurate if you exchange the word “economics” with the word “math”, but the Market ticker have a nice little test for you to do. This test is recommended to a large extent to economic majors, finance Mentalists and banksters, but you as a layman should also read it through a couple of times. If you do not really grasp the economic language, think of it as basic math.
Looking around Europe, this is the place we are heading as well. Not really as bad as in the US, yet, however, the road is clear and the further down it we are when these bubbles in the American economy bursts, the worse the coming debacle will be. Right now we are already passed the levels of the Great Depression, imagine where we will be in a year from now…
Looking at my native homeland, Sweden, the similarities between US 2 years ago and Sweden today is striking. The same low (but even lower in today’s Sweden) interest rates, the same printing of money, the same loose policy for the banking system - in Sweden few banks with lots of trouble - and the same (but higher) amount of borrowing both from the private as well as the public sector. Add to this high unemployment and the coming collapse of several markets in the US, UK and so forth, and you need to start looking in the book of revelations to find proper adjectives.
If you are an economist or want to understand why this crisis isn't over: Check out this post
Let’s see if you whom have a degree in economics understand math and economics. Otherwise I recommend what Mr. Denninger does, hand back your diploma and start flipper burgers instead (highly recomended for central bank-people and the Finance Department) so you do not help out with the destruction of the economy.
The Market Ticker
Looking around Europe, this is the place we are heading as well. Not really as bad as in the US, yet, however, the road is clear and the further down it we are when these bubbles in the American economy bursts, the worse the coming debacle will be. Right now we are already passed the levels of the Great Depression, imagine where we will be in a year from now…
Looking at my native homeland, Sweden, the similarities between US 2 years ago and Sweden today is striking. The same low (but even lower in today’s Sweden) interest rates, the same printing of money, the same loose policy for the banking system - in Sweden few banks with lots of trouble - and the same (but higher) amount of borrowing both from the private as well as the public sector. Add to this high unemployment and the coming collapse of several markets in the US, UK and so forth, and you need to start looking in the book of revelations to find proper adjectives.
If you are an economist or want to understand why this crisis isn't over: Check out this post
Let’s see if you whom have a degree in economics understand math and economics. Otherwise I recommend what Mr. Denninger does, hand back your diploma and start flipper burgers instead (highly recomended for central bank-people and the Finance Department) so you do not help out with the destruction of the economy.
The Market Ticker
The Climate deception
As I have pointed out before, there is not a single evidence for manmade global warming causing any sort of problem; in fact there isn’t even evidence for the existence of manmade global warming. We can only assume that man has some slim miniscule impact, but the fact is we don’t know. On the contrary, all the scientific evidence and all real reports seem to suggest the opposite of what the environmentalists are saying.
And my £100 to anyone that produces a single evidence for what the alarmists are saying still stands. Would love to see any of you idiots try to get that money.
So it is with a degree of satisfaction I have noticed that more and more people are waking up and smelling this, the biggest scam of all time. For instance in Copenhagen an alternative climate-meeting is going to be held at the same time as the elitists, tricksters and fraudulent liars have theirs.
This is really a check of intellect that beats any Mensa-test. Anyone that believes in this obvious scam is an idiot, plain and simple. Are you an idiot?
And my £100 to anyone that produces a single evidence for what the alarmists are saying still stands. Would love to see any of you idiots try to get that money.
So it is with a degree of satisfaction I have noticed that more and more people are waking up and smelling this, the biggest scam of all time. For instance in Copenhagen an alternative climate-meeting is going to be held at the same time as the elitists, tricksters and fraudulent liars have theirs.
This is really a check of intellect that beats any Mensa-test. Anyone that believes in this obvious scam is an idiot, plain and simple. Are you an idiot?
GDP once and for all
For you, the people, to really know what’s what and for you to see through the lies it is necessary to know what GDP really is, how it is measured and why it’s so important for our enemies to deliver positive numbers. GDP is all about blowing a handful of pixie-dust in our eyes to keep us looking at something irrelevant in order to keep something that is important out of the limelight. But even worse than that, this trickery can make us poorer over time.
Let’s start by looking at how GDP is normally calculated.
GDP = private consumption + gross investment + government spending + (exports − imports), or,
GDP = C + I + G + (X − M)
I want you all to take notice on a couple of things in this equation. Firstly exports VS imports or X-M. In the world of basic math this part means that if exports grow in relation to imports GDP increases. If imports grow, GDP goes down. The same happens if either goes down in relation to the other. Okay? With me? This is very basic math that you should be able to figure this out at middle school – which, of course, means that economist, Finance Mentalists, journalists and some other idiots cannot manage it.
What the equation also tells us is that if Government spends more, GDP goes up. You probably get this, but what you really need to know is that it has no real meaning what they spend money on. It can be daycare, roads or flowers, it does not matter. According to GDP calculation it is beneficiary to have people dig holes in ground, fill them up again, and do this over and over. In fact, this is what government often does, not directly, that would be too obvious, but through other schemes like “investigations” or useless government programs to hide unemployment. An investigation takes manpower, costs money and often leads to conclusions a monkey could tell us beforehand. Anything being done to cover up people’s lack of jobs also cost money. Actually it may cost more, in essence contribute more to GDP, then if people in fact had productive jobs.
The same goes for private consumption. The more we shop ‘till we drop, the higher GDP. In the eyes of Keynesians and our enemies it means that the more stuff you buy, the better. This private consumption is not really subjected to any scrutiny other than the notion of spending. If you borrow, use your credit-card or (hardly ever) work to get that money to spend it, is irrelevant, what matters is GDP. Sometimes you can hear one or two voices claiming that savings are to low or that there is a difference in what we actually consume, but those are very few and not nearly as interesting for the media to quote.
All this mentioned is why they are keeping interest rates at zero, throws cheap newly printed money into the system and encourage you to take loans. This is also the main reason why the regime, any of them, continues to bail-out banks, because without getting you and themselves into debt, the system does not really work. The entire structure is built around and dependent on debt. Journalists, pundits, cornflake economists and teachers have either fallen for this swindle or are in cahoots with the elitists.
It is not bad to be in debt, you might claim, and correctly so, but then only if this debt is based on actual value or income. What is bad is when you use loans to buy stuff, in particular when you buy stuff you already have or don’t need and this on the assumption of income or value.
Once and for all: Consumption does NOT CREATE wealth!
What creates value is our productivity, or rather that we actually produce things. If we take something from nature, transform it, mold it, paint it, and make it into something useful that creates value in form of electricity, saves us time or makes future production better, faster or cheaper, then we have created wealth.
Services can also contribute, but then only to enhance our wellbeing or to save time.
And consumption needs to come out of this, not be the basic of the entire system.
Consumption is a good thing and it is our “reward” for being good at producing.
Consumption is not, however, what drives the economy as this GDP-madness and our enemies would like you to think.
With this entire structure in mind, what do massive amounts of stimulus; more debt (both personal and public) and a complete focus on consumption lead us? It leads to poverty and less options. The more indebt we are, the more government spends and the more we are focused on services and consumption, the less actual wealth is created even if GDP goes up. This is why GDP can be positive, but we can still get poorer. It’s all a trickery of the mind, its one big con and you have fallen for it.
This is also one of the reasons why I, and many others, could see this crisis many miles away. To anyone that understand that 1+1=2 and 2-1=1, this depression is not a surprise, its only the logical consequence of too much government, too much regulations and too much consumption on borrowed money. So this crisis cannot be over, it’s a mathematical and factual impossibility, in fact we are just in the beginning of it.
Any budget not tackling the real issue is a horrible budget.
Any politician that wants you to consume instead of produce is your enemy. Journalists and pundits that are lap-dogs to the rich and powerful should be strapped down and be worked-over with a rusty serrated bread knife.
We are being screwed by the elitists and the sooner you wake up, the sooner we can work ourselves out of this mess.
Let’s start by looking at how GDP is normally calculated.
GDP = private consumption + gross investment + government spending + (exports − imports), or,
GDP = C + I + G + (X − M)
I want you all to take notice on a couple of things in this equation. Firstly exports VS imports or X-M. In the world of basic math this part means that if exports grow in relation to imports GDP increases. If imports grow, GDP goes down. The same happens if either goes down in relation to the other. Okay? With me? This is very basic math that you should be able to figure this out at middle school – which, of course, means that economist, Finance Mentalists, journalists and some other idiots cannot manage it.
What the equation also tells us is that if Government spends more, GDP goes up. You probably get this, but what you really need to know is that it has no real meaning what they spend money on. It can be daycare, roads or flowers, it does not matter. According to GDP calculation it is beneficiary to have people dig holes in ground, fill them up again, and do this over and over. In fact, this is what government often does, not directly, that would be too obvious, but through other schemes like “investigations” or useless government programs to hide unemployment. An investigation takes manpower, costs money and often leads to conclusions a monkey could tell us beforehand. Anything being done to cover up people’s lack of jobs also cost money. Actually it may cost more, in essence contribute more to GDP, then if people in fact had productive jobs.
The same goes for private consumption. The more we shop ‘till we drop, the higher GDP. In the eyes of Keynesians and our enemies it means that the more stuff you buy, the better. This private consumption is not really subjected to any scrutiny other than the notion of spending. If you borrow, use your credit-card or (hardly ever) work to get that money to spend it, is irrelevant, what matters is GDP. Sometimes you can hear one or two voices claiming that savings are to low or that there is a difference in what we actually consume, but those are very few and not nearly as interesting for the media to quote.
All this mentioned is why they are keeping interest rates at zero, throws cheap newly printed money into the system and encourage you to take loans. This is also the main reason why the regime, any of them, continues to bail-out banks, because without getting you and themselves into debt, the system does not really work. The entire structure is built around and dependent on debt. Journalists, pundits, cornflake economists and teachers have either fallen for this swindle or are in cahoots with the elitists.
It is not bad to be in debt, you might claim, and correctly so, but then only if this debt is based on actual value or income. What is bad is when you use loans to buy stuff, in particular when you buy stuff you already have or don’t need and this on the assumption of income or value.
Once and for all: Consumption does NOT CREATE wealth!
What creates value is our productivity, or rather that we actually produce things. If we take something from nature, transform it, mold it, paint it, and make it into something useful that creates value in form of electricity, saves us time or makes future production better, faster or cheaper, then we have created wealth.
Services can also contribute, but then only to enhance our wellbeing or to save time.
And consumption needs to come out of this, not be the basic of the entire system.
Consumption is a good thing and it is our “reward” for being good at producing.
Consumption is not, however, what drives the economy as this GDP-madness and our enemies would like you to think.
With this entire structure in mind, what do massive amounts of stimulus; more debt (both personal and public) and a complete focus on consumption lead us? It leads to poverty and less options. The more indebt we are, the more government spends and the more we are focused on services and consumption, the less actual wealth is created even if GDP goes up. This is why GDP can be positive, but we can still get poorer. It’s all a trickery of the mind, its one big con and you have fallen for it.
This is also one of the reasons why I, and many others, could see this crisis many miles away. To anyone that understand that 1+1=2 and 2-1=1, this depression is not a surprise, its only the logical consequence of too much government, too much regulations and too much consumption on borrowed money. So this crisis cannot be over, it’s a mathematical and factual impossibility, in fact we are just in the beginning of it.
Any budget not tackling the real issue is a horrible budget.
Any politician that wants you to consume instead of produce is your enemy. Journalists and pundits that are lap-dogs to the rich and powerful should be strapped down and be worked-over with a rusty serrated bread knife.
We are being screwed by the elitists and the sooner you wake up, the sooner we can work ourselves out of this mess.
Sunday, September 20, 2009
The state of the Swedish economy
Today the Budget Bill for 2010 is put forward to the Swedish Parliament. Of course the opposition complains, as they should, it’s their job, and it is a horrible budget in many ways, but let’s be clear about a couple of facts.
- This crisis is by a very large extent an imported one. It started in other countries and a highly trade dependent country like Sweden feel the effects.
- Going into this depression, Sweden was better equipped than many other countries having paid of large sums of public debt, and having lowered some taxes comes to the labor-market.
- Had the leftie opposition ruled, things would look much worse, because they would not had paid of debt, they would not had lowered taxes and, most importantly, they would have squandered away much more on useless stimulus and bail-outs.
And the more negative:
- The Swedish government hasn’t done enough. They didn’t listen to us with active brain-cells and acted accordingly before the crisis begun. Taxation should be much lower, more publicly owned companies should have been sold off and more debt been paid.
- They are letting the deficit increase, from 38% to a predicted 45% of GDP, in true socialist manner, which in our situation is making things look very grim.
- The fascist laws regarding the internet is putting a lid on one potential growing potential within the economy
The Swedish economy, being dependent on exports, has been severely impacted by the sharp downturn in the global economy. It is estimated that Sweden’s GDP will fall by 5.2 per cent during 2009, which is the weakest growth performance in a single year since the Second World War. Unemployment is still going up, a great bubble has been created in the housing market, the stock market is overvalued and there are several very bad signs in the horizon. More crashes will emerge and when they do, Sweden will suffer severely.
To summarize, the Swedish government have done almost everything wrong, not according to what mainstream cornflake economists say and Keynes would have been pretty proud, but intelligent people that actually understand 4th grade math and recognize what’s what knows that this spells disaster. But however horrible, it could have been a lot worse had the lefties been in power. This is the only solitude there is; that there isn’t more statism.
Another thing we need to keep in mind is the central bank and its maddening interest rate and QE policies. However horrible the government is acting, the real culprit at the moment is the central bank. To quote the bill:
“The situation in the financial markets has stabilized, improving opportunities for households and businesses to obtain loans. This reduces the risk of further negative repercussions on the economy and public finances.”
THIS IS MADNESS! We shouldn’t have improved the possibility to borrow more money; we should do the complete opposite! The only thing such a scam does it to make people buy things they don’t need for money they shouldn’t have, and in doing so moving power and wealth from regular Joes to the already rich and powerful. THIS WILL MASSIVLLY INCREASE THE RISKS FOR NEGATIVE EFFECTS ON THE ECONOMY. Our total debt is already 150% of GDP, why would anyone want to build on this poverty-trap?
How can you be so gullible? Don’t borrow; don’t buy anything like housing, real-estate or even a new car. The world is about to plunge down an unprecedented abyss of financial despair, and when it does, all those with debt and no savings will suffer the most.
And this awful policy of Imperial indoctrination hatched from a swarm of political psychopaths motivated by personal greed and Pol Pot style enthusiasm for social engineering is what has, and will continue to virtually destroy our way of life. This will not change no matter who runs the government, which means Sweden is fucked no matter what.
The enemy class really think we're all just going follow and be good little sheople, and so far they have been right.
What this budget should contain is the following:
- SEK 300bn lower expenditure. A bit less than half to cover the deficit, and almost all the rest to lower taxation. SEK 30-40bn could be thrown at the infrastructure in order to build for the future. When that is done, sell or give away all the roads or whatever to the private sector.
- Delete all the fascist laws surrounding the internet
- Eliminate another thousands or so laws that are unnecessary and hinders in the way of private incentive
- Leave the European Union
But the most important thing to do right now is to make sure that the central bank increase interest rates to 4-5% and that they do not throw any more money at financial institutes. If we did this, it would lead to lower GDP then predicted and some bad assets and debt would be flushed out which would, temporarily, worsen our current situation. However, this would be a very short downturn. Within a year it would be over, and the worst economic disaster ever seen on this planet that is just around the corner would be tackled with ease compared to the rest of the world. So if they just had the balls to do what is right and all you people out there realized how deep in shit we really are, within 4-5 years Sweden would be the riches and best equipped country in the world.
Instead you idiots, the populace, will elect the lefties in the next election, happily borrow more for our impending doom, and let the enemy class throb 25 inches of pain up our rear-ends, so I keep coming back to the best advice you will ever get.
Buy dried-up food packages, tin-cans, candles, batteries, stock up on supplies like oil, gasoline and ammunition. Because even if I’m wrong, those things are good to have at home, and if I’m right, those things may save your life. Be prepared for the worst, and don’t hope for the best.
- This crisis is by a very large extent an imported one. It started in other countries and a highly trade dependent country like Sweden feel the effects.
- Going into this depression, Sweden was better equipped than many other countries having paid of large sums of public debt, and having lowered some taxes comes to the labor-market.
- Had the leftie opposition ruled, things would look much worse, because they would not had paid of debt, they would not had lowered taxes and, most importantly, they would have squandered away much more on useless stimulus and bail-outs.
And the more negative:
- The Swedish government hasn’t done enough. They didn’t listen to us with active brain-cells and acted accordingly before the crisis begun. Taxation should be much lower, more publicly owned companies should have been sold off and more debt been paid.
- They are letting the deficit increase, from 38% to a predicted 45% of GDP, in true socialist manner, which in our situation is making things look very grim.
- The fascist laws regarding the internet is putting a lid on one potential growing potential within the economy
The Swedish economy, being dependent on exports, has been severely impacted by the sharp downturn in the global economy. It is estimated that Sweden’s GDP will fall by 5.2 per cent during 2009, which is the weakest growth performance in a single year since the Second World War. Unemployment is still going up, a great bubble has been created in the housing market, the stock market is overvalued and there are several very bad signs in the horizon. More crashes will emerge and when they do, Sweden will suffer severely.
To summarize, the Swedish government have done almost everything wrong, not according to what mainstream cornflake economists say and Keynes would have been pretty proud, but intelligent people that actually understand 4th grade math and recognize what’s what knows that this spells disaster. But however horrible, it could have been a lot worse had the lefties been in power. This is the only solitude there is; that there isn’t more statism.
Another thing we need to keep in mind is the central bank and its maddening interest rate and QE policies. However horrible the government is acting, the real culprit at the moment is the central bank. To quote the bill:
“The situation in the financial markets has stabilized, improving opportunities for households and businesses to obtain loans. This reduces the risk of further negative repercussions on the economy and public finances.”
THIS IS MADNESS! We shouldn’t have improved the possibility to borrow more money; we should do the complete opposite! The only thing such a scam does it to make people buy things they don’t need for money they shouldn’t have, and in doing so moving power and wealth from regular Joes to the already rich and powerful. THIS WILL MASSIVLLY INCREASE THE RISKS FOR NEGATIVE EFFECTS ON THE ECONOMY. Our total debt is already 150% of GDP, why would anyone want to build on this poverty-trap?
How can you be so gullible? Don’t borrow; don’t buy anything like housing, real-estate or even a new car. The world is about to plunge down an unprecedented abyss of financial despair, and when it does, all those with debt and no savings will suffer the most.
And this awful policy of Imperial indoctrination hatched from a swarm of political psychopaths motivated by personal greed and Pol Pot style enthusiasm for social engineering is what has, and will continue to virtually destroy our way of life. This will not change no matter who runs the government, which means Sweden is fucked no matter what.
The enemy class really think we're all just going follow and be good little sheople, and so far they have been right.
What this budget should contain is the following:
- SEK 300bn lower expenditure. A bit less than half to cover the deficit, and almost all the rest to lower taxation. SEK 30-40bn could be thrown at the infrastructure in order to build for the future. When that is done, sell or give away all the roads or whatever to the private sector.
- Delete all the fascist laws surrounding the internet
- Eliminate another thousands or so laws that are unnecessary and hinders in the way of private incentive
- Leave the European Union
But the most important thing to do right now is to make sure that the central bank increase interest rates to 4-5% and that they do not throw any more money at financial institutes. If we did this, it would lead to lower GDP then predicted and some bad assets and debt would be flushed out which would, temporarily, worsen our current situation. However, this would be a very short downturn. Within a year it would be over, and the worst economic disaster ever seen on this planet that is just around the corner would be tackled with ease compared to the rest of the world. So if they just had the balls to do what is right and all you people out there realized how deep in shit we really are, within 4-5 years Sweden would be the riches and best equipped country in the world.
Instead you idiots, the populace, will elect the lefties in the next election, happily borrow more for our impending doom, and let the enemy class throb 25 inches of pain up our rear-ends, so I keep coming back to the best advice you will ever get.
Buy dried-up food packages, tin-cans, candles, batteries, stock up on supplies like oil, gasoline and ammunition. Because even if I’m wrong, those things are good to have at home, and if I’m right, those things may save your life. Be prepared for the worst, and don’t hope for the best.
Saturday, September 19, 2009
Getting a good hardy rope
Having a good rope around is always a good thing. A rope can be used for hanging laundry, tying up the wife, going rock-climbing or in countless other ways. Of course the choice of rope depends on the purpose of usage. If one, for instance, wanted to drop something weighing around 180 lbs from between four and ten feet the rope needs to hold for that particular pressure and it should also hold several times over, no need to get to many ropes when you can get the job done with just one.
The strength of a rope, in regards to rock-climbing (which is a good way of knowing what is what when it comes to bodies and falling objects) is measured by the rating of static elongation and maximum impact force. The elongation measures the amount a rope stretches when weighted with a standard load (80 kilograms/176 pounds). Ropes with low static elongation stretch less. Higher static elongation means ropes have more stretch (cushioning the impact of a fall). Maximum impact force refers to the amount of force transmitted to a climber during a fall. Low maximum impact force means the rope (not the climber or the protection) absorbs more of the energy generated in a fall. However, such ropes stretch more, increasing your chances of hitting the ground or a ledge.
But we do not really think about this for our main usage since there should not be any ledge and the feet should certainly never hit ground, but it is good to have some solid background information.
Also, one might consider ignoring doing proper calculations, if the rope does not hold; there will be a funny couple of minutes getting another rope, so to “wing it” have its inherent charm. Maybe we can get additional mandrake root out of the deal?
Another fun potential consequence of not doing the proper groundwork is the same thing that happened to the historical figure of “Black Jack”, that is to say a so severe spinal cord injury may occur that it leads to total separation.
For our future procedure we also need to decide whether or not to induce a ligature. That may lead to more tenderness between the most upper part and torso with the result of less movement afterwards, but is that really want we want? Such method has been used effectively before, among other places Nuremberg. But surely a bit more dangling and a tad more of muffled noises are preferable? If so another choice need to be made, well such a choice will most likely be made anyway – namely the choice of venue. A tree is classical and have that sense of being close to nature, on the other hand a lamp-post have proven useful before in addition to being in close proximity for most urban inhabitants. Whatever the choice may be, make sure to make room for applauding spectators.
Come to afterwards we need to consider the sphincter relaxing and spontaneously evacuated urine and faeces. Although fun as supplementary proper consequence, it may lead to some stench, which, coincidentally, the entire baggage will produce sooner or later anyway. Even though the dangling end-product can induce certain levels of righteous thinking, we need to find proper burial grounds. Not of religious reasons, but rather sanitary. Also please remember to mark the spot for future travelers. One can always find a reason to urinate and do a little jig on such a place.
The strength of a rope, in regards to rock-climbing (which is a good way of knowing what is what when it comes to bodies and falling objects) is measured by the rating of static elongation and maximum impact force. The elongation measures the amount a rope stretches when weighted with a standard load (80 kilograms/176 pounds). Ropes with low static elongation stretch less. Higher static elongation means ropes have more stretch (cushioning the impact of a fall). Maximum impact force refers to the amount of force transmitted to a climber during a fall. Low maximum impact force means the rope (not the climber or the protection) absorbs more of the energy generated in a fall. However, such ropes stretch more, increasing your chances of hitting the ground or a ledge.
But we do not really think about this for our main usage since there should not be any ledge and the feet should certainly never hit ground, but it is good to have some solid background information.
Also, one might consider ignoring doing proper calculations, if the rope does not hold; there will be a funny couple of minutes getting another rope, so to “wing it” have its inherent charm. Maybe we can get additional mandrake root out of the deal?
Another fun potential consequence of not doing the proper groundwork is the same thing that happened to the historical figure of “Black Jack”, that is to say a so severe spinal cord injury may occur that it leads to total separation.
For our future procedure we also need to decide whether or not to induce a ligature. That may lead to more tenderness between the most upper part and torso with the result of less movement afterwards, but is that really want we want? Such method has been used effectively before, among other places Nuremberg. But surely a bit more dangling and a tad more of muffled noises are preferable? If so another choice need to be made, well such a choice will most likely be made anyway – namely the choice of venue. A tree is classical and have that sense of being close to nature, on the other hand a lamp-post have proven useful before in addition to being in close proximity for most urban inhabitants. Whatever the choice may be, make sure to make room for applauding spectators.
Come to afterwards we need to consider the sphincter relaxing and spontaneously evacuated urine and faeces. Although fun as supplementary proper consequence, it may lead to some stench, which, coincidentally, the entire baggage will produce sooner or later anyway. Even though the dangling end-product can induce certain levels of righteous thinking, we need to find proper burial grounds. Not of religious reasons, but rather sanitary. Also please remember to mark the spot for future travelers. One can always find a reason to urinate and do a little jig on such a place.
The ugliest expenditure around
Apparently the leader figure of the Swedish opposition, Mona Sahlin, social democrat, has jumped upon a jet to go to a party. Since there is an election going on some people complain over this. A couple of bloggers ridicule the… hum… lady… I think she is one, female that is. A couple of others thinks she is entitled to a bit of fun, mingling together with who’s-who of the Swedish famous-list.
So far I haven’t read anything about the real issue at hand - that tax payers are the ones paying the bills.
Sahlin’s media secretary, Anna Helsén, is quoted saying that this feline is paying for everything herself. But who pays her salary? And Anna’s for that matter? Who pays for the flight? The alcohol? You do! This is the issue, nothing else. No one should care about her pouring alcohol over her brain-cells, might actually be a good thing. And no one should care about a church election, what the fuck is politicians doing in church anyway? However, her blatant disregard for your tax money should be an issue.
Isn’t she a hottie?
So far I haven’t read anything about the real issue at hand - that tax payers are the ones paying the bills.
Sahlin’s media secretary, Anna Helsén, is quoted saying that this feline is paying for everything herself. But who pays her salary? And Anna’s for that matter? Who pays for the flight? The alcohol? You do! This is the issue, nothing else. No one should care about her pouring alcohol over her brain-cells, might actually be a good thing. And no one should care about a church election, what the fuck is politicians doing in church anyway? However, her blatant disregard for your tax money should be an issue.
Isn’t she a hottie?
Friday, September 18, 2009
I’m dancing in the rain...
Since first taking a no-protectionism vow at a summit meeting last November, the world's 20 major economies have been responsible for as many as 121 "blatantly protectionist" measures, with 134 more in the pipeline, the organization Global Trade Alert states.
"The real economy may now be shrinking at a slower rate, and a recovery may be in view, but unemployment will continue to rise for some time to come. Pressures to protect jobs at home will grow and governments will find these pressures difficult to resist," said the new report.
This is what I have been saying all along. Just look at any trade number. The Baltic dry cargo index is way downstairs, and every country handing out reports is saying both export and import is going down. And it is bound to get worse the more time that passes, just as during the great depression (soon to be renamed to the “Minor one”) such actions will slow the potential economic recovery and worsen the situation.
Oh, what a glorious feeeeeeling…
And from all over it’s streaming in demands and prayers to these übermench with the hope of them granting some of these wishes. They need to save the economy, protect the environment, hand out fuzzy slippers and do lots of stuff.
I am so looking forward to this next G20 meeting where our enemies - again! - will reassure us that they want free trade, and that more stimulation is needed to save us all.
… I am haaappy again…
"The real economy may now be shrinking at a slower rate, and a recovery may be in view, but unemployment will continue to rise for some time to come. Pressures to protect jobs at home will grow and governments will find these pressures difficult to resist," said the new report.
This is what I have been saying all along. Just look at any trade number. The Baltic dry cargo index is way downstairs, and every country handing out reports is saying both export and import is going down. And it is bound to get worse the more time that passes, just as during the great depression (soon to be renamed to the “Minor one”) such actions will slow the potential economic recovery and worsen the situation.
Oh, what a glorious feeeeeeling…
And from all over it’s streaming in demands and prayers to these übermench with the hope of them granting some of these wishes. They need to save the economy, protect the environment, hand out fuzzy slippers and do lots of stuff.
I am so looking forward to this next G20 meeting where our enemies - again! - will reassure us that they want free trade, and that more stimulation is needed to save us all.
… I am haaappy again…
Avril Lavigne single
Yes, it seems to be true, at least according to the tabloids. I have spent all morning dissecting this, making lots of notes, roaming the net in a never ending search to see if I could ever stand a change now when that idiot is out of the way. This is very interesting and I think I need to get the group together so we can compare notes.
In the meanwhile millions of people across the globe are starving and the depression keeps going, but Pffffffff… who cares? Celebrities are dying and breaking up, that’s [much] more important.
In the meanwhile millions of people across the globe are starving and the depression keeps going, but Pffffffff… who cares? Celebrities are dying and breaking up, that’s [much] more important.
Monaco cave in to the fascists
Monaco is to be removed from an OECD "grey list" when it signs a fresh round of international tax agreements on Monday. The principality is set to sign deals with 12 countries including the US, Belgium and France.
The agreement follows a resolution at the G20 meeting in April that threatened action against 45 territories with regimes considered to ease tax evasion. The OECD defines countries with less than 12 agreements to exchange tax information as non-compliant.
Soon there will be no good places left in the world. Where is that Alien Invasion? We need it.
The agreement follows a resolution at the G20 meeting in April that threatened action against 45 territories with regimes considered to ease tax evasion. The OECD defines countries with less than 12 agreements to exchange tax information as non-compliant.
Soon there will be no good places left in the world. Where is that Alien Invasion? We need it.
The true story of our approaching doom – Part III
We have looked at how the stage has been set by our enemies in part I, we learned how our banking and finance system works and how money and interest rates are being used to create this scheme in part II, now let’s look at what really happened this time around.
I say “this time around” because similar events have lead to crises before, and will again and again and again; it cannot stop until we end this horrible system.
Our enemies want us to believe the following three things:
1) Too few regulations caused greedy people to take advantage of the system. Often enough Bernard Madoff is portrayed as a shining example of greed, too much capitalism and few regulations.
2) It was the free market that collapsed and we had a credit-crunch with too little money being available within the system.
3) Lehman Brothers collapsing was the real start of the down going spiral.
The answer our elitists then hand us is that we need more regulations, more government, and lots of more credit available. We also need to have more world wide solutions with maybe global taxation on financial flow, a world currency and much more cooperation between countries.
All of this is lies. It’s the continuation of the same scams that lead us into this mess in the first place. It’s a smoke-screen behind closed curtains hidden within a mirage filled with mirrors and magic tricks. The ringmasters of our impending doom is trying to fool us again in order to press that 2by4 further up our collective arses before the shit truly hits the fan.
While pundit-tricksters and fraudulent banksters is feeding us these lies, lazy journalists either sit around on their fat behinds translating fictive reports or are actively participating in the giant cover-up by only printing the fabrications and ignoring the real facts. Elected criminals only care about their own re-election and to show how they “do stuff”, not really caring what they do, the important part is to show us, the voters, that they react. “Oh, that’s horrible – I propose this law!” – is solemnly proclaimed in different ways over and over again. And they have tons of money, the printing press have never worked harder, so stimulus all around!
In the real world, this crisis was created a long time ago. Further down you can watch another example of how and why, but in order to make a long story short, what you need to know is the three actual facts:
1) We had too many regulations, too many hinders, and Madoff is a small time crock in comparison with many of those true master-criminals still roaming free within our financial system.
2) It was over excessive intrusions of government and central banks that created this mess. It’s not only the government entities of Fanny May and Freddie Mac that’s helped out with the madness; there are a lot of government intrusions creating problems. And we have too much money in the system; the present of cheap credit is what got us into this crisis, so we don’t need more.
3) Lehman was not the first or the last financial institute going down, and they are only a small symptom, like a spot among many. Consequently Lehman Brothers going out of business was neither the start of the crisis nor what made it worse. That’s a complete lie.
Although, to a certain extent, we can sum up the cause of our current economic crisis in one word — GREED. Over the years, mortgage lenders were happy to lend money to people who couldn’t afford their mortgages, even if this is most obvious in the US, the same goes on pretty much everywhere. But they did it anyway because there was nothing to lose and a lot to gain. These lenders were able to charge higher interest rates and make more money on sub-prime loans. If the borrowers default, they simply seized the house and put it back on the market. On top of that, they were able to pass the risk off to mortgage insurer or package these mortgages as mortgage-backed securities. Easy money!
The whole thing was one big scheme. Everything was great when houses were selling like hot cakes and their values go up every month. Lenders made it easier to borrow money, and the higher demand drove up house values. Higher house values means that lenders could lend out even bigger mortgages, and it also gave lenders some protection against foreclosures. All of this translates into more money for the lenders, insurers, and investors.
Unfortunately, many borrowers got slammed when their adjustable mortgage finally adjusted. When too many of them couldn’t afford to make their payments, it causes these lenders to suffer from liquidity issue and to sit on more foreclosures than they could sell.
But now all is fine right? Those banks have cleansed those toxic assets and wannabe defaults? Right? Wrong. Almost all of them are still in the system; in fact there are more of them. And looking at UK and US banks, they are mainly selling these houses to, tada! Themselves! I have already covered most of this scam in other posts, just keep in mind that nothing has changed, the problem is still there, now inflated through even more government intervention and lots and lots of more fiat money.
But before all this happen people in the western world have been producing less and less while consuming more and more. Worst of all places is the US of A where over 70% of the economy is consumerism, and how do Americans (and many others) pay for this consumption? By borrowing. Not only direct borrowing via the consumer or companies, but also making the best use of the USD. As the world reserve currency the federal reserve have been able to print lots of money and the US government have been able to issue more bonds than otherwise would be possible. All this goes on while the government keeps expanding and more and more regulations come into being. Lefties often argue the opposite, which just goes to show you how deluded those people are.
Basically, the crisis was created by government, worsen by bankers and now they are doing everything all over again. During the last crisis when the dot.com bubble burst, they inflated the bubble again to avoid a real downfall, now we see the aftermath of those actions. Now they have done it again, the same damn thing. But this time around it’s much much worse. The bubbles, the inflated madness and all the things that has been down and will be done is creating the worst disaster ever known to man.
Please watch this movie:
I say “this time around” because similar events have lead to crises before, and will again and again and again; it cannot stop until we end this horrible system.
Our enemies want us to believe the following three things:
1) Too few regulations caused greedy people to take advantage of the system. Often enough Bernard Madoff is portrayed as a shining example of greed, too much capitalism and few regulations.
2) It was the free market that collapsed and we had a credit-crunch with too little money being available within the system.
3) Lehman Brothers collapsing was the real start of the down going spiral.
The answer our elitists then hand us is that we need more regulations, more government, and lots of more credit available. We also need to have more world wide solutions with maybe global taxation on financial flow, a world currency and much more cooperation between countries.
All of this is lies. It’s the continuation of the same scams that lead us into this mess in the first place. It’s a smoke-screen behind closed curtains hidden within a mirage filled with mirrors and magic tricks. The ringmasters of our impending doom is trying to fool us again in order to press that 2by4 further up our collective arses before the shit truly hits the fan.
While pundit-tricksters and fraudulent banksters is feeding us these lies, lazy journalists either sit around on their fat behinds translating fictive reports or are actively participating in the giant cover-up by only printing the fabrications and ignoring the real facts. Elected criminals only care about their own re-election and to show how they “do stuff”, not really caring what they do, the important part is to show us, the voters, that they react. “Oh, that’s horrible – I propose this law!” – is solemnly proclaimed in different ways over and over again. And they have tons of money, the printing press have never worked harder, so stimulus all around!
In the real world, this crisis was created a long time ago. Further down you can watch another example of how and why, but in order to make a long story short, what you need to know is the three actual facts:
1) We had too many regulations, too many hinders, and Madoff is a small time crock in comparison with many of those true master-criminals still roaming free within our financial system.
2) It was over excessive intrusions of government and central banks that created this mess. It’s not only the government entities of Fanny May and Freddie Mac that’s helped out with the madness; there are a lot of government intrusions creating problems. And we have too much money in the system; the present of cheap credit is what got us into this crisis, so we don’t need more.
3) Lehman was not the first or the last financial institute going down, and they are only a small symptom, like a spot among many. Consequently Lehman Brothers going out of business was neither the start of the crisis nor what made it worse. That’s a complete lie.
Although, to a certain extent, we can sum up the cause of our current economic crisis in one word — GREED. Over the years, mortgage lenders were happy to lend money to people who couldn’t afford their mortgages, even if this is most obvious in the US, the same goes on pretty much everywhere. But they did it anyway because there was nothing to lose and a lot to gain. These lenders were able to charge higher interest rates and make more money on sub-prime loans. If the borrowers default, they simply seized the house and put it back on the market. On top of that, they were able to pass the risk off to mortgage insurer or package these mortgages as mortgage-backed securities. Easy money!
The whole thing was one big scheme. Everything was great when houses were selling like hot cakes and their values go up every month. Lenders made it easier to borrow money, and the higher demand drove up house values. Higher house values means that lenders could lend out even bigger mortgages, and it also gave lenders some protection against foreclosures. All of this translates into more money for the lenders, insurers, and investors.
Unfortunately, many borrowers got slammed when their adjustable mortgage finally adjusted. When too many of them couldn’t afford to make their payments, it causes these lenders to suffer from liquidity issue and to sit on more foreclosures than they could sell.
But now all is fine right? Those banks have cleansed those toxic assets and wannabe defaults? Right? Wrong. Almost all of them are still in the system; in fact there are more of them. And looking at UK and US banks, they are mainly selling these houses to, tada! Themselves! I have already covered most of this scam in other posts, just keep in mind that nothing has changed, the problem is still there, now inflated through even more government intervention and lots and lots of more fiat money.
But before all this happen people in the western world have been producing less and less while consuming more and more. Worst of all places is the US of A where over 70% of the economy is consumerism, and how do Americans (and many others) pay for this consumption? By borrowing. Not only direct borrowing via the consumer or companies, but also making the best use of the USD. As the world reserve currency the federal reserve have been able to print lots of money and the US government have been able to issue more bonds than otherwise would be possible. All this goes on while the government keeps expanding and more and more regulations come into being. Lefties often argue the opposite, which just goes to show you how deluded those people are.
Basically, the crisis was created by government, worsen by bankers and now they are doing everything all over again. During the last crisis when the dot.com bubble burst, they inflated the bubble again to avoid a real downfall, now we see the aftermath of those actions. Now they have done it again, the same damn thing. But this time around it’s much much worse. The bubbles, the inflated madness and all the things that has been down and will be done is creating the worst disaster ever known to man.
Please watch this movie:
Another central bank idiot
Karolina Ekholm, Deputy Governor of the Swedish central bank had some comments to make today at a little meeting. This hellish female was quoted saying, among other stupidities, that inflation is going to be negative during 2009. She has been an accomplish in creating inflation, so of course she doesn’t want you to know about this little scheme, or she does not know a single thing what she is talking about. Either way this is an outlandish lie, or she is so bent behind a wagon that she actually believe that a couple of hundreds of billions of newly printed notes thrown into the system have no effect whatsoever. Take your pick really, a lying bitch or an incompetent maniac, hard to tell what’s worse.
She said: “Nevertheless, the situation looks brighter today than it did a couple of months ago”
No, it doesn’t. It looks a lot worse. Just because there are a temporarily halt in the down-going spiral, seen to equities and certain areas of the economy, is not the same thing as things are looking brighter. She would know this if she actually understood economics.
Then she continues with the interest rate crap those central bank people are hell-bent to spread around. She voted for keeping the interest rate down around zero, which makes her automatically malevolent. Destroying the economy is her goal, and she and the other monkeys are doing a good job at it.
Another hilarious quote:
“The development of the krona has been stronger than we expected. Just as it is difficult to explain the earlier weakening of the krona in terms of developments in the Swedish economy, it is difficult to explain the recent appreciation in the krona”
No, it’s not. It’s very easy. Firstly, any currency is measured against other currencies. This means that the “value” can be going up; when in reality it’s going down because other currencies are worse off. Secondly, and this she should know, the central bank and government securities are the things that control the value of the currency. She is one of those that decide whether or not the currency should gain or lose in value. If she doesn’t get that, she is the wrong person at this job. There is a lagging effect how the inflation or deflation of the currency becomes to be obvious, but that too she should know.
Then she goes on and on about smoke and mirrors theories mixed with lots of irrelevant statements about her being thrown straight into the fire getting appointed just a tad over a half a year ago. Oh, I have a fire for you; or rather the Swedish people will have a big bon-fire to throw you in once they figure out how evil you really are.
The wickedness really shines when she said:
“Let me conclude by saying that it appears that the fiscal policy and monetary policy stimulation measures that are being implemented throughout the world are beginning to have the desired effects.”
Riiiight…
“The desired effect”, please remember that statement when you purchasing power is diminished into nothing and the defaulting levels drives families all across the land to live on garbage.
I cannot believe we have a central bank in the first place, and even less so how you idiots out there let such horrible people do these things to you.
Interest rates should be a lot higher today, there should be no extra credit whatsoever created out of thin air, and there should be no central bank. As long as this womanly demon and her chronically immoral buddies get to dictate our lives, we are screwed.
She said: “Nevertheless, the situation looks brighter today than it did a couple of months ago”
No, it doesn’t. It looks a lot worse. Just because there are a temporarily halt in the down-going spiral, seen to equities and certain areas of the economy, is not the same thing as things are looking brighter. She would know this if she actually understood economics.
Then she continues with the interest rate crap those central bank people are hell-bent to spread around. She voted for keeping the interest rate down around zero, which makes her automatically malevolent. Destroying the economy is her goal, and she and the other monkeys are doing a good job at it.
Another hilarious quote:
“The development of the krona has been stronger than we expected. Just as it is difficult to explain the earlier weakening of the krona in terms of developments in the Swedish economy, it is difficult to explain the recent appreciation in the krona”
No, it’s not. It’s very easy. Firstly, any currency is measured against other currencies. This means that the “value” can be going up; when in reality it’s going down because other currencies are worse off. Secondly, and this she should know, the central bank and government securities are the things that control the value of the currency. She is one of those that decide whether or not the currency should gain or lose in value. If she doesn’t get that, she is the wrong person at this job. There is a lagging effect how the inflation or deflation of the currency becomes to be obvious, but that too she should know.
Then she goes on and on about smoke and mirrors theories mixed with lots of irrelevant statements about her being thrown straight into the fire getting appointed just a tad over a half a year ago. Oh, I have a fire for you; or rather the Swedish people will have a big bon-fire to throw you in once they figure out how evil you really are.
The wickedness really shines when she said:
“Let me conclude by saying that it appears that the fiscal policy and monetary policy stimulation measures that are being implemented throughout the world are beginning to have the desired effects.”
Riiiight…
“The desired effect”, please remember that statement when you purchasing power is diminished into nothing and the defaulting levels drives families all across the land to live on garbage.
I cannot believe we have a central bank in the first place, and even less so how you idiots out there let such horrible people do these things to you.
Interest rates should be a lot higher today, there should be no extra credit whatsoever created out of thin air, and there should be no central bank. As long as this womanly demon and her chronically immoral buddies get to dictate our lives, we are screwed.
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Oh, that burning sensation
You can just hear them rattling the cages, howling to the moon and scratching their teenie-weenie peckers. I wonder how they are going to circumvent this one.
Oh, and is that burning documentation I smell? Boxes being emptied, files being deleted, and the hush-factor just became a murmur. And I’m guessing that more banksters are, at this very moment, sucking on a 9mm.
Maybe there is hope for the US after all?
Oh, and is that burning documentation I smell? Boxes being emptied, files being deleted, and the hush-factor just became a murmur. And I’m guessing that more banksters are, at this very moment, sucking on a 9mm.
Maybe there is hope for the US after all?
Gold again.
Gold continues upwards, this to no surprise to anyone with a brain. Again we hear some idiots claiming that the high is already reached or that we will soon see a correction. This is nonsense. If it takes half a year, one year or two, isn’t really the point, the point is that gold and other valuable metals will continue to go up. I have predicted a high around $2300/ounce, but there are some that claims much higher than that. $7000/ounce have been mentioned.
Here you can follow the gold-price:
Here you can follow the gold-price:
The true story of our ominous doom – Part II
As mentioned, economics is a very easy subject to grasp and understand. Contrary to popular belief you do not need to be a financial wiz to be able to interpret the market, and politicians don’t need to make judgment-calls in response to an economic crisis. You do not even need an education in finance or business, in fact, such an education might very well be in the way. Just look at all the mainstream cornflake economists that never seem to get anything right.
The free and open market works upon a couple of very understandable rules that never change. A couple of axioms that exists no matter what anyone says or tries to do.
Firstly supply always corresponds to demand and vice versa.
Secondly 1+1=2 and 2-1=1
Thirdly, our main source of information and what it all comes down to is prices. Prices is the way we measure how sort after a merchandise is, how valuable, how easy we can buy it, what the cost of making it versus the profit we can make in the end, and so on and so on.
So what happens when someone tries to manipulate the market, or if a government imposes a set of laws to control it? Basically nothing, the same rules apply still; however, the equation may differ a bit. If Government increases prices on something they consider to be dangerous, like tobacco, the real price stays the same. What has changed is the price plus the additional cost. If this additional cost goes to high, smuggling ensues, alternatives pops up, people start making their own. A very obvious example of this is drugs. Government has through imposed illegality and harsh penalties made sure that the price is astronomical, hence large profits can be made. In affect inviting people to produce and sell drugs. If the government happens to knock out a drug lab, prices goes up and the effect is even more criminals. This is why the war on drug never can be won. It’s a mathematical and factual impossibility.
Let’s take a fictive example as well and look at milk. Milk is one of mankind’s main sources of food, we use it for baking, quenching our thirst and lots of other things. Now, let’s assume that a couple of state-employed scientists figure out that milk is the main cause of cancer. After a couple of months of scaremongering in the media our bellowed politicians need to act and ban milk. They make it illegal and introduce a sentence of 10 years imprisonment for selling milk. This would make the milk-price quadruple or even more and since there are a lot of grandmas wanting to bake and kids that wants to drink milk, you have a huge market, and so in steps those that can and are willing to produce and sell milk on the illigal milk-market.
These sorts of distortions of the price, which it’s, all about, only change the preserved price, not the actual value or real price that would exist without the regulations and laws.
And as said, this is always true, no matter what anyone does, no matter how high the taxes goes or what the product or service in a particular case happens to be. It also applies to two very common commodities that is the main culprit behind our economic crisis and why it hasn’t and cannot end any time soon.
The two things I’m talking about are Interest rate and money.
Interest rate is actually the rate of paying back or getting back a certain percentage of money. If interest rates go up, loaning money or taking out a mortgage gets more expensive. If interest rates go down, it gets cheaper to borrow and getting into debt gets more appealing the lower the rate is. Or, in effect, when interest rates go down we tend to borrow and spend more money because saving it is in comparison a less rational choice. The opposite is also true, if interest rates go up, we tend to save the money and make more prudent choices of what to buy.
Money is just paper a certain central bank and a certain country have decided should be the way of doing trade. Instead of changing a bicycle for a carton of juice we use money. It makes trade easier and accumulated wealth can easier be stored and used for investments.
The money is printed and supplied from the central bank. The central bank lends or “gives” this money to other banks or financial institutes that in turn put it out on the market. However, and this is very important to understand, the banks does not lend out that particular amount they get from either the central bank or peoples savings, no, they lend out a lot more. This is called Fractional-reserve banking.
Fractional-reserve banking is the banking practice in which banks keep only a fraction of their deposits in reserve (as cash and other highly liquid assets) and lend out the remainder, while maintaining the simultaneous obligation to redeem all these deposits upon demand. By its nature, the practice of fractional reserve banking expands money supply (cash and demand deposits) beyond what it would otherwise be. Because of the prevalence of fractional reserve banking, the broad money supply of most countries is a multiple larger than the amount of base money created by the country's central bank. That multiple (called the money multiplier) is determined by the reserve requirement or other financial ratio requirements imposed by financial regulators.
Or, to put it in simpler terms; a bank has $100 in actual money, but lend to customers $2000-3000-4 000. As long as people don’t withdraw all their savings and pay back all their loans at the same time, the system “works”.
And, what is really important, the more people that borrow, the more customers, the more the bank can lend. For every additional $100 another couple of thousands are lend to the market.
If you understand everything written here, you also understand why this crisis emerged. What has happened is that too much money and too low interest rates have created distortions on several markets, most notably the housing and real-estate markets. So when people cannot pay back their loans, when mortgages are defaulting and the limit of spending has been reach, a contraction will happen. In fact it should happen. But in our saviors and great leaders steps and what do they do? They lower interest rates even further, throws more money into the system, borrow loads of more from other countries to spend it because the people are not spending enough.
So tell me again, how can this crisis be over?
As I said in the start, and as I have pointed out so many times, the math does not tell lies. The actual foundation cannot be changed.
Temporarily, this entire “stimulus”-madness can plaster over the basic problems; sweep them under the rug for a while. Not only will such actions eventually fail, but it will make the problems even worse.
Take a look at this little movie to further enhance your knowledge to what I have just told you. Then, to really make sure you understand, read through my text again. If you do this and you come out on the other side with this knowledge you will never trust anything any bank does ever again. You will stop listening to politicians crap and you will finally understand why our current crisis isn’t over.
The free and open market works upon a couple of very understandable rules that never change. A couple of axioms that exists no matter what anyone says or tries to do.
Firstly supply always corresponds to demand and vice versa.
Secondly 1+1=2 and 2-1=1
Thirdly, our main source of information and what it all comes down to is prices. Prices is the way we measure how sort after a merchandise is, how valuable, how easy we can buy it, what the cost of making it versus the profit we can make in the end, and so on and so on.
The free and open market works upon a couple of very understandable rules that never change. A couple of axioms that exists no matter what anyone says or tries to do.
Firstly supply always corresponds to demand and vice versa.
Secondly 1+1=2 and 2-1=1
Thirdly, our main source of information and what it all comes down to is prices. Prices is the way we measure how sort after a merchandise is, how valuable, how easy we can buy it, what the cost of making it versus the profit we can make in the end, and so on and so on.
So what happens when someone tries to manipulate the market, or if a government imposes a set of laws to control it? Basically nothing, the same rules apply still; however, the equation may differ a bit. If Government increases prices on something they consider to be dangerous, like tobacco, the real price stays the same. What has changed is the price plus the additional cost. If this additional cost goes to high, smuggling ensues, alternatives pops up, people start making their own. A very obvious example of this is drugs. Government has through imposed illegality and harsh penalties made sure that the price is astronomical, hence large profits can be made. In affect inviting people to produce and sell drugs. If the government happens to knock out a drug lab, prices goes up and the effect is even more criminals. This is why the war on drug never can be won. It’s a mathematical and factual impossibility.
Let’s take a fictive example as well and look at milk. Milk is one of mankind’s main sources of food, we use it for baking, quenching our thirst and lots of other things. Now, let’s assume that a couple of state-employed scientists figure out that milk is the main cause of cancer. After a couple of months of scaremongering in the media our bellowed politicians need to act and ban milk. They make it illegal and introduce a sentence of 10 years imprisonment for selling milk. This would make the milk-price quadruple or even more and since there are a lot of grandmas wanting to bake and kids that wants to drink milk, you have a huge market, and so in steps those that can and are willing to produce and sell milk on the illigal milk-market.
These sorts of distortions of the price, which it’s, all about, only change the preserved price, not the actual value or real price that would exist without the regulations and laws.
And as said, this is always true, no matter what anyone does, no matter how high the taxes goes or what the product or service in a particular case happens to be. It also applies to two very common commodities that is the main culprit behind our economic crisis and why it hasn’t and cannot end any time soon.
The two things I’m talking about are Interest rate and money.
Interest rate is actually the rate of paying back or getting back a certain percentage of money. If interest rates go up, loaning money or taking out a mortgage gets more expensive. If interest rates go down, it gets cheaper to borrow and getting into debt gets more appealing the lower the rate is. Or, in effect, when interest rates go down we tend to borrow and spend more money because saving it is in comparison a less rational choice. The opposite is also true, if interest rates go up, we tend to save the money and make more prudent choices of what to buy.
Money is just paper a certain central bank and a certain country have decided should be the way of doing trade. Instead of changing a bicycle for a carton of juice we use money. It makes trade easier and accumulated wealth can easier be stored and used for investments.
The money is printed and supplied from the central bank. The central bank lends or “gives” this money to other banks or financial institutes that in turn put it out on the market. However, and this is very important to understand, the banks does not lend out that particular amount they get from either the central bank or peoples savings, no, they lend out a lot more. This is called Fractional-reserve banking.
Fractional-reserve banking is the banking practice in which banks keep only a fraction of their deposits in reserve (as cash and other highly liquid assets) and lend out the remainder, while maintaining the simultaneous obligation to redeem all these deposits upon demand. By its nature, the practice of fractional reserve banking expands money supply (cash and demand deposits) beyond what it would otherwise be. Because of the prevalence of fractional reserve banking, the broad money supply of most countries is a multiple larger than the amount of base money created by the country's central bank. That multiple (called the money multiplier) is determined by the reserve requirement or other financial ratio requirements imposed by financial regulators.
Or, to put it in simpler terms; a bank has $100 in actual money, but lend to customers $2000-3000-4 000. As long as people don’t withdraw all their savings and pay back all their loans at the same time, the system “works”.
And, what is really important, the more people that borrow, the more customers, the more the bank can lend. For every additional $100 another couple of thousands are lend to the market.
If you understand everything written here, you also understand why this crisis emerged. What has happened is that too much money and too low interest rates have created distortions on several markets, most notably the housing and real-estate markets. So when people cannot pay back their loans, when mortgages are defaulting and the limit of spending has been reach, a contraction will happen. In fact it should happen. But in our saviors and great leaders steps and what do they do? They lower interest rates even further, throws more money into the system, borrow loads of more from other countries to spend it because the people are not spending enough.
So tell me again, how can this crisis be over?
As I said in the start, and as I have pointed out so many times, the math does not tell lies. The actual foundation cannot be changed.
Temporarily, this entire “stimulus”-madness can plaster over the basic problems; sweep them under the rug for a while. Not only will such actions eventually fail, but it will make the problems even worse.
Take a look at this little movie to further enhance your knowledge to what I have just told you. Then, to really make sure you understand, read through my text again. If you do this and you come out on the other side with this knowledge you will never trust anything any bank does ever again. You will stop listening to politicians crap and you will finally understand why our current crisis isn’t over.
The free and open market works upon a couple of very understandable rules that never change. A couple of axioms that exists no matter what anyone says or tries to do.
Firstly supply always corresponds to demand and vice versa.
Secondly 1+1=2 and 2-1=1
Thirdly, our main source of information and what it all comes down to is prices. Prices is the way we measure how sort after a merchandise is, how valuable, how easy we can buy it, what the cost of making it versus the profit we can make in the end, and so on and so on.
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Kiddy porn and UN idiots
Some 750,000 sexual predators are constantly prowling the internet in a bid to gain contact with children, a United Nations report is warning. Well, let’s take a look at that for a while…
"The number of sites devoted to child pornography worldwide is growing. The number of predators connected to the internet at any one time is estimated to be 750,000," said Najat Maala, Special Rapporteur on the child prostitution and child pornography issue. Unicef also estimates there are more than four million websites featuring minors, including those of children aged under two years.
Really? Even if so, it gets a harder and harder to find any. I remember a time when you hardly could go online looking for regular porn without stumbling upon some child porn, and if you looked for some porn at Kazaa, DC++ or similar downloading places, you were bound to find some kiddy stuff as well. Nowadays it’s almost impossible. There isn’t kiddy porn on any of the main downloading sites, not what I could find. And I cannot remember the last time I roamed the net looking for porn and happened to end up at some preteen site, it was a long time ago. And I’m a porn lover going online looking for porn all the time.
In the wake of this report, I set out to find some on purpose; it was very hard to see anything at all. The closest I could find was some semi-nude models of pretty young age, but that you can find in any clothing catalogue.
So the search engines have cleaned out most of it, regular porn sites have no links or pop-ups anymore, very little can be found at downloading sites, and if you go look for it, it’s almost impossible to find. Internets own built-in regulatory system has worked and deleted the easy access that was before.
Najat Maala noted that the age of sexual consent should not be used as an excuse for child pornographic peddlers - as it is used in places where this age limit is lower than the definition of who constitutes a minor. This is because a "child under 18 cannot be considered to be able to consent to sexual exploitation, including child pornography," she added.
I have myself always thought that that age limit is highly stupid. The legal age of sex consent varies a lot from country to country. Everything from 12y to 20y. It’s 15 in Sweden, 16 in the UK, but 18 in most American states. So what constitutes as statutory rape in the US is perfectly legal in most of Europe. And we all know that most teens start to have sex long before they turn 18. A 15y old girl choosing to pose nude in front of her webcam isn’t the same as an 11y old getting raped, but according to UN it is. Makes you wonder how this affect the statistic doesn’t it?
And look at the choice of words Najat uses. “consent to sexual exploitation” - so everyone taking picture, doing porn or such is being sexually exploited no matter what. How nice.
And doesn’t it strike you as odd that these kinds of reports is pouring out all the time, papers keep quoting them with doomsday headlines and parenting groups shout all the time, at the same time as regulations, laws and the monitoring of the internet is reaching fascist heights? You don’t need to be a conspiracy nut to see the writings on this wall.
"Images of sexually exploited children are not only growing in number but are also increasingly shocking," added Maala, who estimates that between 10,000 and 100,000 minors are victims of the child pornography network.
Between 10 000 and 100 000? Leaves a lot of roam for errors, don’t you think? And again, notice the choice of words. “the child pornography network” – it seems to imply that there is one big network out there, are they really trying to convince us of such stupidity? And what does she mean by “increasingly shocking”? Was older times pedophiles more prudent and only fiddled a little bit? Did pedophiles 50 years ago handle their victims much better and less shocking? Are we seeing the dawn of the age of super-pedophiles?
Pedophilia in itself may be bad, acting upon against youngsters makes it a crime, but when stuff comes out of the UN with very strange conclusions and sentences it is very hard to take it serious. Maybe kiddy-porn is on the rise, but I doubt it. Maybe there are more underage sex-slaves, but I doubt that too. Things was not better before in history, we are just better at detecting it nowadays, and these kinds of reports will only have two effects. 1) Make pedophiles even harder to find 2) give our enemies another reason to shut down internet.
"The number of sites devoted to child pornography worldwide is growing. The number of predators connected to the internet at any one time is estimated to be 750,000," said Najat Maala, Special Rapporteur on the child prostitution and child pornography issue. Unicef also estimates there are more than four million websites featuring minors, including those of children aged under two years.
Really? Even if so, it gets a harder and harder to find any. I remember a time when you hardly could go online looking for regular porn without stumbling upon some child porn, and if you looked for some porn at Kazaa, DC++ or similar downloading places, you were bound to find some kiddy stuff as well. Nowadays it’s almost impossible. There isn’t kiddy porn on any of the main downloading sites, not what I could find. And I cannot remember the last time I roamed the net looking for porn and happened to end up at some preteen site, it was a long time ago. And I’m a porn lover going online looking for porn all the time.
In the wake of this report, I set out to find some on purpose; it was very hard to see anything at all. The closest I could find was some semi-nude models of pretty young age, but that you can find in any clothing catalogue.
So the search engines have cleaned out most of it, regular porn sites have no links or pop-ups anymore, very little can be found at downloading sites, and if you go look for it, it’s almost impossible to find. Internets own built-in regulatory system has worked and deleted the easy access that was before.
Najat Maala noted that the age of sexual consent should not be used as an excuse for child pornographic peddlers - as it is used in places where this age limit is lower than the definition of who constitutes a minor. This is because a "child under 18 cannot be considered to be able to consent to sexual exploitation, including child pornography," she added.
I have myself always thought that that age limit is highly stupid. The legal age of sex consent varies a lot from country to country. Everything from 12y to 20y. It’s 15 in Sweden, 16 in the UK, but 18 in most American states. So what constitutes as statutory rape in the US is perfectly legal in most of Europe. And we all know that most teens start to have sex long before they turn 18. A 15y old girl choosing to pose nude in front of her webcam isn’t the same as an 11y old getting raped, but according to UN it is. Makes you wonder how this affect the statistic doesn’t it?
And look at the choice of words Najat uses. “consent to sexual exploitation” - so everyone taking picture, doing porn or such is being sexually exploited no matter what. How nice.
And doesn’t it strike you as odd that these kinds of reports is pouring out all the time, papers keep quoting them with doomsday headlines and parenting groups shout all the time, at the same time as regulations, laws and the monitoring of the internet is reaching fascist heights? You don’t need to be a conspiracy nut to see the writings on this wall.
"Images of sexually exploited children are not only growing in number but are also increasingly shocking," added Maala, who estimates that between 10,000 and 100,000 minors are victims of the child pornography network.
Between 10 000 and 100 000? Leaves a lot of roam for errors, don’t you think? And again, notice the choice of words. “the child pornography network” – it seems to imply that there is one big network out there, are they really trying to convince us of such stupidity? And what does she mean by “increasingly shocking”? Was older times pedophiles more prudent and only fiddled a little bit? Did pedophiles 50 years ago handle their victims much better and less shocking? Are we seeing the dawn of the age of super-pedophiles?
Pedophilia in itself may be bad, acting upon against youngsters makes it a crime, but when stuff comes out of the UN with very strange conclusions and sentences it is very hard to take it serious. Maybe kiddy-porn is on the rise, but I doubt it. Maybe there are more underage sex-slaves, but I doubt that too. Things was not better before in history, we are just better at detecting it nowadays, and these kinds of reports will only have two effects. 1) Make pedophiles even harder to find 2) give our enemies another reason to shut down internet.
Warmongering Barack
Oh, the nonviolent messianic figure of the Obamination loves harmony and peace so much that do you know what he is doing now? He’s sending an additional 3000 troops to Afghanistan and 1000 to Iraq which will make the total amount of fighting forces in the area higher than during his predecessor’s time at the oval office. There are also thousands of so called “contractors” doing lots of the dirty work.
This goes well together with the 14.8% increase in defense orders that made up most of the content in one of those “positive” reports we heard about from the US recently. You know, one of those reports that were quoted by brain-dead journalists as a goooood siiiign.
Yeah... this is going to end in such a happy note…
This goes well together with the 14.8% increase in defense orders that made up most of the content in one of those “positive” reports we heard about from the US recently. You know, one of those reports that were quoted by brain-dead journalists as a goooood siiiign.
Yeah... this is going to end in such a happy note…
Et tu Daily Show, et tu
This ACORN business is so funny, and it’s almost completely ignored by media. It's one of the biggest scandals I have ever seen and I'm yet to see a single article in Europe about it. Worse yet, the American press don't report either.
The old media continues to fuck up. No wonder people aren't buying newspapers or watching the news anymore. It's all crap, and can you mention a single journalist actually doing his or her job?
The old media continues to fuck up. No wonder people aren't buying newspapers or watching the news anymore. It's all crap, and can you mention a single journalist actually doing his or her job?
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| The Audacity of Hos | ||||
| ||||
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)