A school shooting in Sweden

In Sweden people are shot every single day, gun control works? My ass it does.. 

Apparently the Swedish police is taking preventive measures to tackle a future school shooting.

My only question is; why?

Guns are outlawed, all Swedish Schools are gun-free zones, and as our neighboring countries have proven, Norway especially, a shooting therefor becomes impossible. We know for a fact that only in bible-thumping America where guns grow on trees and every banjo playing nut-job is out to slaughter the innocent, such things occur.

Right?

Well, of course this is wrong, especially since… EVERY! SINGLE! SHOOTING! HAPPEN! IN! A! GUN! FREE! ZONE!!!

If you are a parent, regardless if you are in the U.S. in Sweden or wherever, and you don´t take action now; how will you feel after the fact? Once your kids are dead and you know they may have been saved if only self-defense had been allowed. Is the safety of your job and your fear of government bigger then how much you love your kids?

Of course teachers and parents should be armed. Of course every single woman out there should be armed. Of course every person you meet on the street should/could carry several guns. Of course guns should be allowed everywhere, all the time. That would be a safer, much safer society.

Politician’s don´t want you armed, that take away their power and if you can rely on yourself for protection, what do you need government for? And in the end you might use that gun to overthrow an oppressive and authoritarian government. Consequently you know why politician’s don´t want you carrying a gun. Has nothing to do with your or anyone else’s safety but theirs, only theirs.

The police can only, in the case of 99% of all crimes, arrive on the scene afterwards. Getting raped, robbed, murdered, or hacked into little pieces? Well, if you are lucky enough to put out a status update on Facebook so your friends can call the police or if you can call yourself before the slaughter or before that greasy smelly old rapists smack you down for a “fun time” – well then the police will arrive of course, but 10min, 15min, or perhaps 1 hour later. They will take your statement, if you are still alive, and they will try to do their job, but afterwards – after the fact.

And this really is a woman issue more than anything. A woman is physically weaker than a man and consequently THE ONLY way to equalize the balance of power is to be armed. It may be a pepper spray or you might have taken karate lessons, but since a man, especially several men, still is able to put any woman down, the only real protection a woman can rely on is a gun. If you are a feminist, advocating gun rights should be your number one priority – if not, how can you expect us thinking folk to take you seriously?

You should get a gun. Legally or illegally. That is your right, and don´t let anyone tell you differently. Get protected, protect the young, protect property rights and if anyone tries to rape, rob or kill you, shoot the bastard. So what if you get prosecuted, you are alive and you have shown the rest of the criminals that sometimes normal folk fight back. Damn your government. Damn the idiots. Get a gun! 

First we take their guns, and then we take Berlin

Protect yourself? Pfff, nonsense. Government will protect you! 

There´s not often a comparison between Hitler and a contemporary leader is warranted, and every time you Godwin yourself you have sort of lost the argument beforehand. Still… It is impossible not to.

One of the key aspects of the National Socialists was to create, withheld and uphold what come to be called Hitler Jugend. Basically youth camps with self-improvement, exercise and training to help out in society and support those in need. Boy scouts really. Pretty harmless by itself, but the indoctrination and political propaganda was not.

Another key element was the control of media. Basically the Nazis were the first mass-producers of media, in all fields; radio, cinema, pamphlets, mass gatherings and so on.

Furthermore they realized they needed an external enemy – something they could get the people to rally against. Usually it’s perceived that it was the Jews, as a race, they conjured up as an enemy. Although that is true in all its stupidity, the entire story is seldom told. What is not always said is that they saw the Jews instrumental in Germany´s defeat in WW I because the banks that bankrolled both sides was mostly owned and controlled by Jews, and with a European History of blaming Jews for pretty much everything it was not such a farfetched idea as it may seem for us, today, at a first glance.

I could go on about the lunacy of the Nazis and give a further history lesson, but let me come to my main point.

Do you know what one of the first decrees the National Socialist party issued after consolidated power? They took away the people´s right to own and bear arms.

Not uncommon for totalitarian regimes to follow that very path. If you want to control the populace, you cannot have them armed and able to defend themselves now can you? So of course Stalin, Mao, Castro and Hitler (as well as many others) outlawed self-defense. Usually under the disguise of justice and wanting to bring forth a less violent society – the government can and will protect you!

And this is a concept not only used by dictators. Once you strip people of their right to defend themselves, they only have one place to go once they get robbed, raped, tricked or beaten; to their government. A gun-free society is solely based on the premise that government is and should be the only line of defense. Government is justice, government will defend you and your rights, and so government officials are the only ones allowed to carry weapons.

In a democratic state with a decent market economy and stable institutions this sort of work because we all know that criminal gangs, the Mafia and rapists never use weaponry - such things are outlawed after all, and criminals obey the law.

But even if we sometimes see the occasional butter knife in the pocket of a Hells Angel member and knowing how a soft air-gun is the weapon of choice for drug runners (unless Government provides them with alternatives), we are still left with the basic principle; Government is good, self-protection is bad.

You see this is what all those dictators understood fully. Unarmed people are easier to boss around then if armed. And this is the very essence of gun rights.

Sure you should have the right to shot would-be rapists and if someone breaks into your home, you should have a right to protect it. Also going to school knowing that teachers can, if push comes to shove, bring forth a gun and at least save most if not all of you, is a fact hard to ignore. There are a lot of reasons for people to own and carry guns, but the main reason and why gun-rights are so important, perhaps more so than any other right, is that if the government turn from being the protector to becoming the main source of evil, if a government becomes what it is supposed to protect you from, then you should have the means and the power to do something about it.

Let me clarify this once more so you understand; self-defense and standing up against criminals and rapists is secondary – so is hunting, or anything else guns can be used for. The main purpose of having an armed populace is to protect it from its own government.

This is why all totalitarians hate people with guns. This is also the main reason why most politicians, and especially people leaning to the left, hate people that advocate gun rights. If the people have guns and are willing to use them against their government, how can politicians get away with all the crap they want to get away with? In the end government may be more afraid of the people, then the people are afraid of its government – and that cannot stand.

You haft to understand this when talking about guns and things like the American constitution. Yes, guns save lives, and there are plenty ofways to prove this, but even if the opposite side would get all the facts on their side, it does not change the fundamental idea of an armed populace.

A gun can, and sometimes should, be used against both an armed assailant entering your home and against armed thugs hired by government – perhaps even against leaders and politicians.

Scary uh? Do I sound dangerous to you? Most of you probably think that I do, and guess what a government official think while reading this. Oh my, do you think I will end up on one of those maybe-terrorist lists?

But what you should be concerned about is being unarmed while constant propaganda fills media and your government takes step after step towards a very dark and oppressive future. And when (not if!) the next Hitler or Stalin comes along, you stand there with nothing to fight with it will not feel so comfy. Sure the people outnumber both the military and police 20 to 1, or more, but rushing against a machine gun is not an easy thing to do when all you have is a stone and a pitchfork. It is always easier and safer to conform and obey, perhaps even turn in your neighbor as a good little citizen.

Consequently you should not think and argue that all gun right activists are bible-thumping right-wing extremists, because they may save your life someday.

In light of this watching the pick-pocket in Chief of the white house declaring that new gun laws are needed while his Obama youths goes to camp and learn how great their leader is, should make you think twice before siding with what journalists and politicians say on the matter. Whether you think, as I do, that armed teachers and abolishing gun-free zones will save lives, or you think that is a crazy notion, please remember that such a discussion is secondary to having the people able fight their own government.

And also please bear in mind that today we have a new threat that is everywhere and strikes both abroad and nearer to home; terrorists! Sometimes they can be recognized wearing a turban and speaking Arabic, or they can be a child walking a suspicious road home from school in Pakistan, but we all know they are everywhere. A horrible foe, a dyer threat to the freedoms and a threat to our wonderful prosperity in the West. Only the existence of such heinous folk is enough to bring forth the surveillance state - after all we need to protect our habitat and if we need to slaughter millions of dark skinned people to find one or two real targets, it’s a sacrifice needed for the good of humanity.

Starting war after war, invading country after country, fighting a largely fictitious enemy, having celebrities, media and big business on his side, murdering more kids then all school shootings put together, taking away people´s rights to own guns, millions of youths passing through indoctrination camps, more and bigger government while detaining without trial or reason and even executing his own citizens, nah, Obama is nothing like Hitler…

…After all, Obama won The Time´s ´Person of the year award´ for the second time, surely Hitler would have never… oh, hold on… wait just a second… 

How to destroy a country

If you borrow more money and buy more stuff you don´t need, I will appear! jey! 

We have seen this a few times now, not only recently, but over time as well. We know it never worked before and in fact it never will work either but constantly and ferociously our magnificent leaders try it again and again and again.

What I am talking about is of course trying to solve problems created by too much cheap credit with way too low interest rates and too much government interference with even more of the same.

Sweden is now heading down the same path towards the abyss as previously Greece, Spain, and all the rest went galloping down towards. Well, to be fair it is probably a road more similar to that Japan and the U.S. If time allowed it Sweden would face a stagnant economy with permanent problems and an ever increasing debt-mountain, just like the Japanese have had for a couple of decades and the U.S. have had for a few years. Sadly time won´t allow that happier scenario.

I say happier because we should be so lucky to only have a stagnant economy with sky-high debts and very high unemployment. But no, time is up.

I don´t really understand why so many out there keep allowing the elitists to repeat the mistakes of neighbors and previous rulers. In fact it seem like most of you even encourage it. Pundits, journalists and most economists certainly do, but the people too seem to live in a dream world far, far away where pink unicorns immediately appear when more paper money is printed, where the sky turn wonderful blue and gold sipper out from every stone instantly after we borrow more trillions, a world filled of wonders and shiny rainbows as long as we give government and banks more power.

Delusional idiots.

For once I would like to see politicians stand up and say;

“We are sorry, we messed up. We will however fix this now by doing the complete opposite of what has been done. We will cut government in half, allow the market to set interest rates, and we will tighten the grip of both our money supply and our banks. After that we´ll roll back all the laws and rules that we have put in place to obstruct you normal folk. Yes, this means much lower, and for a while minus, comes to GDP. It will mean that many will lose their jobs and homes, and plenty of businesses will go bankrupt. But in the end and after a few years of hardship and hard work, we will get real prosperity and real growth back. If you instead want The Greatest Depression, please ignore us and vote for someone else.”

That would be the truth and that would be the shinier happier road to take.

Our government printed trillions and gave it to big banks - look how happy we are! Jey! 

But reading comments online and seeing what a happy jump the stock market did when the Swedish central bank issued even lower interest rates yesterday, it chills my bones. I feel sick and disgusted.

Instead of fixing the problems they created and letting the market correct itself, instead of flushing out bad investments and get people to save again, the central banksters issued a decree that promises certain destruction - and this at a time when the entire world is going down the drain.

And the only thing commentators seem to care about is ´when´ (not if) the Swedish government will pour more gasoline on the fire by borrowing/printing and throwing such borrowed/printed cash into the economy. As if that’s the remedy to bring forth opulence and pink unicorns.

Anyone that understands finance and economy knows that in order to get real healthy investments you need savings. Without savings there are no investments, because there is no money to invest. From a Keynesian view government can step in and play the investor by borrowing and printing money and so get investments going in the economy, but in reality all such a scheme accomplishes is that the government takes future savings and future investments and put them to use today since the money borrowed has to be paid back (with interest) and any additional notes printed brings with it inflation.

Another thing people with working synapses understand is that we today live within a debt-dependent and an ever-increase-in-prices economy. Take away the debts and the constant price increases and the economy crashes. Automatically. As a matter of fact; if we took away all debts there would be no money. All money is created from, by, because of, and in order to increase debt. In essence anytime a government tries to do the right thing deflation, crashing real-estate markets and failing banks becomes a reality. It too is automatic. Or, to put it bluntly, if they do the right thing voters will riot and vote for the other guys. This is why every single government is doing the same thing. From their point of view, they have no other choice. It’s either eat the bullet now or pray and hope that something or someone will save them and the country. Left or right? Have no meaning anymore. It does not matter. All of them need to keep the banks solvent, keep prices going up and keep at least a fair amount of debt in the system.

It’s a failed Keynesian system built around the idiocy of Fractional Reserve Banking.

Only if you vote for the same parties as usual, then this is our happy future together! 

It’s not really socialism, although it often leans in that direction, and it’s not capitalism. It’s a highly regulated; government controlled market economy wherein the big banks rule supreme and the ´Too big to fail´ control the pawns. And with a constant increase in regulations, the roll-out of the surveillance society, and the escalation of our problems going forth towards a very shaky future, the closest ideology becomes Fascism.

But regardless of what label or ideology you wanna put on it, the reality is that we´re inside the biggest shit-storm in human existence. There are no magical formulas; there are no government programs, there´s no savior waiting behind the curtain – this is it, this is The Greatest Depression.

I hope you all enjoy the show – it’s going to be fabulously gory and magnificently disastrous. And sadly Sweden won´t be saved, the central bank has seen to that. 

Autocracy grows while the world crashes

Remember this when that rusty pipe of financial Armageddon penetrates you... 

As you should know by now our global debt serf system is very effective – and in spectacular fashion our economies are slowly (but surely) moving towards a financial abyss. Keynesians and socialists are still screaming that we need more debt while conservatives claiming to be against certain expenses, want to keep or expand others. Unions, pensioners, and other groups are looking for their handout and whenever anyone mentions cuts; the anger from such groups can be measured on the Richter scale. Teachers, pundits and journalists all in unison claim we need more government involvement in the economy while people keep voting for the same political parties and ideas as they always vote for.

In essence nothing has changed other than that more and more people has awaken to the realization that the world economy is getting worse and worse.

Sadly the way forward is dictated by the very same malicious entities that created our problems. Of course they in turn are eagerly applauded and cheered on by the very same clueless morons that sold and packaged the original scams, and they in turn are enthusiastically mentioned on the news as our saviors.

Consequently things are getting worse by the minute.

Reading news article comments and listening to friends I could conclude that we have had a rude awaking. Even a few journalists seem to have realized where this is heading. Sadly, as eluded to above, people only see the consequences, present and future, but they don´t see the why or the road traveled to reach this point.

And if we don´t understand why we ended up with The Greatest Depression and if we don´t know the road traveled  how can we turn this around?

The answer is; we can´t.

This is the biggest difference now, with this crisis, in comparison with all other economic crashes of history; there is only one way out and any suggested alternative will not just fail, it will in fact make things worse.

No inflationary policy will save us, no additional spending will bring forth prosperity, no new laws will create jobs, and no matter how many times our great and fantastic leaders fly private jets to meet in order to discuss - they cannot do anything to turn this around. It doesn't matter how much lefties scream - and get - more rules and more excessive expenditures. It has no meaning if we close down our boarders to keep any elusive immigrants away from our women and jobs.

We cannot get out of this and we will have an enormous financial collapse dwarfing that of the 30´s – nothing can stop that now.

What is even worse than our pending and unavoidable crash is that there is nowhere out up ahead either. From our leader’s perspective, from the viewpoint of economists, and with the perception of most people in mind, we cannot solve this. It cannot be done. Consequently we´re not talking about 5 years or 10 or 15 years of recession/depression, we´re basically talking forever.

Recession/depression for all time… Fun isn´t it?

The reason is that the system is dependent on debt and constant price increases. If prices go down and debts in general go down, the system implodes. Automatically. To me, and anyone that actually understands economy and finance, prices going down is a good thing and debts created outside of production is a bad thing and if going down or become eliminated; it’s a great. But our current system of Fractional reserve banking, constant inflation and new exotic derivatives popping up every week lead mainstream fools to conclude that prices and debts going down is a bad thing and if that occurs cornflake-economists and politicians will squeal about lacking cash-flow or that we´ve have a credit crunch.

If you understand this you also understand that the ONLY way out (which no one will consider or take) is to let it all crash and fail, and consequently that we, afterwards, set up a better more rational financial system.

Of course there are three other ways we can get out of this mess; 

      1)      Alien intervention.

A benevolent Alien race, or ourselves from the future, arrive to fix it for us.

      2)      Devine intervention.

Benevolent God(s) arrive to fix it for us.

      3)      A massive increase in productivity

For example; cold fusion is invented alongside a cure for every illness and everyone get clean water. This is only a temporary fix though, but would let them run the scam for another decade or two.

Since these three options are very unlikely to occur it only leave us with one way out; Capitalism.

Yes, I know, you think we have capitalism. You think that capitalism is the same as corporatism. The rich is getting richer and Goldman Sachs rules the world. Businesses are getting bailed out while workers get fired. IMF and the Euro is the same as capitalism run amok.

Sadly many believe in such fairy-tales and socialists believe in it so wholeheartedly that they, despite seeing most of the problems of the world (which often is what make them socialist), cannot get out of their fabricated world view.

If you believe that central banks, centralized power, and a mammoth law system is the same as capitalism, you´ve totally misunderstood the entire idea. If you believe that George W Bush or the Tories or the moderate party of Sweden represent capitalism, then you´re not informed.

I already know that we will not choice the path of righteousness, freedom and prosperity, and so the bankruptcy- and debt game will continue and with it so will our continuous decline. The only question in my mind at the moment is; will there be another world war? 

Killing 3 year olds – eugenics is fun!

Sorry, but mommy and daddy has decided to put you down 
- put your finger in this outlet please...  

Abortion is in itself a controversial subject - and it’s the only political or social issue were I always find myself waver.

Being libertarian most issues are automatic, it’s about self-reliance, making own decisions, and fighting to be free from others and free from the state. Most of the time having a libertarian persuasion is consequently reasonably simple; I should be free to make my decisions about myself, my body and my life until I encounter another individual with equal right to his/her body and life.

Comes to abortion however it is not that simple. We´re talking about life after all, but when is the fetus a viable human? After how many months? A woman should have all right to her own body, but should she have so above another human who´s life depends on her decision? Albeit a human only beginning to form.

Putting human life and individuals right to live above all else create a conflict comes to the issue of abortion and I´ve always had a hard time picking a side.

Normally I come to the conclusion that most countries have it about right. This because I cannot in any way or form side with those considering the woman and her right to her body as absolute – not when another life is in the balance, and I can neither side with the other side arguing that life is created and sacred already at conception – if so, why is not each sperm and each egg sacred as well?

Having a couple of months or so to make a decision about abortion is therefore, according to me, a decent compromise.

However, when you start to compromise about life and these kinds of decisions; you always get freaky eugenic trolls like this popping up.

Is a child living on borrowed time until its three years old? And why that limitation? Is a 3,5 year old able to make own decisions or be smart enough to grasp how the government own his or her red butt and can do whatever they want with it. Has a 4y old passed over from parasitic living to become a viable example of human life? Has a 5y old? 6? 7?

If we listen to government and politicians we could assume that the transition to becoming a self-reliant existing being never will occur. Every step of the way, from the cradle to the grave, government entities and different groups owns much, if not all, of us and our decisions.

Could we not make the assumption that government (or our parents) has the right to kill us throughout our entire existence?

Keeping United Nations spokespersons in mind and listening to people like Bill "let´s kill msn" Gates, this notion does not seem as farfetched as it may seem at first glance.

And since we know that there are plenty of Malthusian f*ks roaming around freely, can we not assume then that genocide is always in the cards?

Reading about “scientists” asking for leniency comes to infanticide it seems that we´ve really reach the bottom of the barrel. Not only are our societies crashing before our very eyes due to Fractional Reserve Banking and government running amok – on issue after issue morality too seem to be lost.

Ethics and common sense is no longer part of western societies. Even during the Dark Age´s you could argue that our humanity did not go lost, can we really say the same today?

Regardless I would love to see the first court case were parents snuffed their 2y old because the child was such a burden to family finances and hear these two lowlifes as “experts”.

The world is a fun place, isn´t it?

You gotto love those experts

Been checking around newspapers this morning and just as any blind and deaf leprosy infected monkey would have guessed; the pundits and so called “experts” are out in force telling us why Mittbama Oromney lost to the number 1 choice and current puppet of the banksters.

Of course Mittens is a Mormon and he did a few TV-blunders which both are mentioned by almost every pundit in the western hemisphere as key reasons. Other factors mentioned are Obama´s great re-election campaign and how he showed statesmanship during Sandy. Mittens shortcomings are also frequently mentioned as well as him being too far right (Hahaha!).

So far I´ve not seen any paper mentioning Ron Paul and the more libertarian wing of GOP that either voted for Dr Paul or didn´t vote at all. Those people make up a good portion of voters, perhaps not enough to swing over the win to Romney, but not far off. Even more importantly are the independent voters that could have voted for the Mormon if he´d brought a few Ron Paul ideas to the table or if (even better) if Ron Paul had been the candidate. Ron Paul was in this sense the ONLY republican candidate that stood a chance of beating the warmongering black guy.

But the most important and most significant trait, what really won the election, was how the banksters went all in to keep the scam rolling and how Bernie of the Fed promised unlimited bail-outs and unlimited printing just a few months before the election. Once this happened only a fool could believe that anyone else but the Obamination would win.

Another reason why Mittens Orama lost was that - contrary to what papers say - his politics are almost exactly the same as the sitting presidents. On point after point two presidential candidates have never run on so similar agendas, so why vote for the unknown factor such as a rich Mormon who eats babies when a black well-spoken politically correct guy is already there?

Of course the bankster endorsement, the lacking Libertarian vote and the similarities between candidates will not be part of the consensus. It does not fit into the norm of things.

Looks to me like the debt serf system is functioning spectacularly and completed with wireless Obamanet the show now will go on. Worldwide financial destruction and following wars and cumulating despair is to follow, and so with it further extremism, harsher rule, and Nobel Prizes handed out to camp guards like candy.

The end is nigh folks. 

the biggest none surprise ever

As I´ve known for many months; the current Goldman Sachs puppet Obama won the election. It was never exciting, it was never a race, and anyone paying attention knew Barack would win. When the banksters go all in and when Bernie the spender promises unlimited printing a few months before voting, the game was already over.

Goldman Sachs puppet #2 Mitt Romney was never even considered. 

Unified Scandinavia – let´s do it!

Since I started to think about the notion of a unified Scandinavia, the thought has festered and grown and the more I contemplate the more I believe it would be a really good idea.

Of course there are obstacles and many and various questions need to be asked and answered, but the thought has merit and to me it is strange that no political figure or organization is pushing this agenda.

A few stats to first consider:

Country	inhabitants  2011	GDP/capita 2011	GDP - 2011 USD      billion
Sweden	9,480,205	$43,000	$458
Norway	4,973,029	$53,300	$479.3
Denmark	5,543,453	$37,600	$333.20
Iceland	313,183	$38,500	$14.05
Finland	5,402,758	$47,386	$255.30
	25,712,628	$43,957.20	$1,061
excluding Finland*	20,309,870	43,100	$805

*it can be argued both that Finland is not part of Scandinavia and that she would not be able or willing to join

What I regard as the hardest initial issues to get through are the memberships in the EUSSR (Denmark, Sweden and Finland) and the NATO membership (Denmark, Norway, Iceland).

Of course I would argue that NATO membership should be refused and consequently no Scandinavia in direct alliance with warmongering U.S. and their bloodthirsty allies. New referendums about EU membership is a given and we already know that if such referendum occurs, especially with the notion of a unified Scandinavia in the balance, all current members would vote to leave.

The EU-part can probably be solved, but the NATO issue might be harder since we all know that politicians want more political warmongering entities, not less. I believe that our elected frauds would promote and push for membership, so this is something we need to keep an eye on.

When these hurdles are passed, we have several administrative and government formation issues to tackle.

For example, should we continue to live with a constitutional monarchy as Norway, Sweden and Denmark, or become a republic like Finland? Personally I think that we should keep the Monarchy and that Queen Margrethe II of Scandinavia (Denmark today) should be the new head of state. It’s the oldest line of the monarchies, and since I believe that Copenhagen should be capital it’s sort of goes together. Also we cannot circumvent the historical meaning of having Queen Margrethe II as regent when her namesake created the Kalmar Union (1397-1523). We should keep the Monarchy as its part of our history; it comes with traditions, and since it is an unchangeable part of society it will work as stabilizer. The other royal lines should get duchy-assignments or perhaps assigned certain tasks such as eternal seat in some council(s) or some such.

As mentioned I believe that Copenhagen should be capital. It’s close to ancient (and still viable) trade routes and with the bridge over to Malmö the entire area is very suitable. It’s the capital closest to the continent and I see a lot of building- and development potential and I believe that within a few years the Copenhagen-Malmö capital will house 3-4 million people making it a hub for the new Scandinavian state.

As you can tell I am talking about a completely unified Scandinavia – not a union as EUSSR or a loose coalition. This may be the hardest pill to swallow for Norwegians and Finns, so I don´t believe it’s doable, but I believe it would be essential for the success of this idea. History shows us that if we want this to succeed we need an authoritative central power. Of course the Scandinavian heritage include local governance and certain amounts of decision made close to the ones effected, and one of the main reasons the Kalmar Union broke up was because the Danish royalty govern too much for themselves with little or no understanding of the freedom of the Swedish peasantry or local laws/rules/noblemen. Consequently there has to be a balance, but I strongly believe that central authority is necessary.

IF all of the above can be solved we come to the issue of how government should be organized, what constitution we should have and what set of laws there should be. This is a chapter by itself and I am probably not the best person to answer how this could work or how the transition could be organized, but generally speaking there has to be a clear and obvious foundation. This means that the constitutional laws need to be few, to the point and easy to understand.

I am not only taking as from my political viewpoint here. The foundations of this new set of laws need to be understood by all and give a clear directive about the freedoms and rights of inhabitants. This is very important, almost as important as content. The content CANNOT include arbitrary feminist stupidities or subjective ideas about what equality is. IF for some reason such madness will follow over from today’s laws (which it will) it should be in the common sections of ordinary laws. The constitution should address and apply for all and consequently we cannot have any sort of “right to work” or women’s rights to sit on every board – not in the constitution.

We also need a constitutional court – perhaps based in Oslo.

And finally we need to solve the problem of common denominators. The tax rates, military founding, municipal sizes and forms, etc. etc.

Of course the lowest common denominator SHOULD be the norm, but our leaders will see it differently. This will probably be the biggest problem as I see it, even though our politicians will play it cool and not see any problem at all.

The final controversy needed to be solved is that of language. Although all the Scandinavian languages are related (except for Finnish) the differences are still large enough to pose certain problems. Personally I believe that we should have one official language and that language should be Swedish. The reason is that Sweden is the biggest most populace country and Swedish is by far the most spoken language, and I believe we need one single official language. Naturally all other languages should have some kind of official stamp, perhaps as minority language, but in order to unify, truly unify, Scandinavia one language should be taught in all schools and be the one single official language.

Well, there you have a short version of what I believe to be a really good idea. Obviously I´ve skipped a few issues and just skimmed the surface here, but I just want to convey what is very likely to occur in during The Greatest Depression. Not my version perhaps, but I think we´ll see a more Scandinavian unity up ahead. 

Licking fecal matter of shoes

Translation from Norwegian; Spontaneous scenes of joy

after the announcement of 2012 Peace Prize

As our worldwide debt serf system work its magic in spectacular fashion the Norwegian Nobel committee decided to hand over the Nobel Peace Prize to an entity that is creating animosity, nationalism and economic disaster in Europe.

This entity is run by unelected bureaucrats, has a president voted on by no one, and the entire power structure is filled with “ex” Maoists and “former” Soviet Union concubines. It has created hatred of Germans, Northerners nowadays sees Mediterranean’s as lazy idiots, fascist parties are growing everywhere, Nazis now have support of 20% of Greeks (and they go; whaaat?), and communism is showing its ugly bloody head all over the place.

This entity´s counterfeiting machine is throwing money at big banks while punishing the poor and the elderly – and today, according to surveys, only 25% of European sees this entity as something positive.

Out in the world the dismal failures of this entity are just as bad - failed diplomacy and pointless speeches are the only things showing up.

So while Spain is heading for civil war and the sound of combat boots echoing over Europe again, the Norwegian committee headed by Torbjorn Jagland (coincidently the Secretary-General of the council of Europe) appoints the very entity highly responsible for the riots and accountable for the approaching Greatest Depression a Peace Prize.

Satire really is obsolete.

This entire thing stinks.

Al Gore got the Nobel Peace Prize for… well, no one knows why, but presumably so he can continue to fly around in his private jet collecting millions from duped morons while promoting the biggest scam of all time; manmade global warming. The Obamination got the prize so that he could increase the military budget peacefully while start more wars and murder thousands of children – and now, when the pet project of our Great Leaders is in jeopardy, it get the prize. And only seconds later our unelected president van Rompuy (a Goldman Sachs flunky) announces that a Eurozone budget is necessary to bring us all together and curve the economic disaster he and his compatriots have created.

I wonder if they will continue to claim its peacefulness when mobs rule supreme and dangling kleptocrats and riddled with holes Oligarchs is littering our streets?

The importance of leaving the EUSSR cannot be stressed enough. So what if a political party is supposedly racists, if they want to leave the Marxist project of the continent, vote for them. If the tree huggers want to stop paying billions to this Marxist entity and to its idea of getting its own army, vote for them. Get out on the streets, write editorials, and get people to sign petitions, scream, complain, and refuse to obey any law coming from Brussels. We haft to end this now. Not later, not years into the future, now!

If not, the next time people really “complain” about the EUSSR they will do so with guns in their hands and murder in their minds. Our elitists should be afraid, very afraid, they cannot win this. Either they stop with this crap, or they will be stopped. I hope for all our sakes they take the right road.

We have to leave – now!

Sorry, we don´t accept Euro. Zimbabwean dollars is okay though...

The European Union (EUSSR) is going to fail miserably and the Marxist euro will crash and burn. This is no surprise for people paying attention, we knew this would happen. I wrote several articles more than a decade ago that civil war would come to Spain and that Greece would turn fascist. I also pointed out that asymmetric chocks, too low interest rates and too much of Froggy and Italian policies would turn the euro into a spectacular failure which could lead to hyperinflation.

A blind parrot dying from congestive heart failure could have predicted this outcome – but the money masters, the socialists and the bureaucrats ignored it. Sadly even so called “conservatives” or “nationalists” and even a few “neo-liberal” screw-ups put their fingers in their ears, closed their eyes and went “La! La! La! La! – I can’t hear you!”. My best guess is that all those freshly created cushy comfy jobs with God-like benefits that come with the EUSSR kleptocracy silenced most, the rest of the party members with the slightest hint of anti-Europe sentiment was taken care of through internal bullying.

No worries! We´ll force those darn whore´s to accept our Marxist Euro.

But let’s also face it, it was funny for a while. New regulations deciding how hard buss-doors should close in every European country and how bendy a cucumber should be, is the stuff of entertainment folklore. Watching the oligarchs send thousands of lobbyists with money-filled suitcases trying to force their way through an army of helpers, assistants and administrators in order to get their bribes through to the European Parliamentarians was, and still is, huge popcorn moments.

And who can forget how magnificent leaders of this European serfdom managed to impose myriads of restrictions on smoking and paying tens of billion to non-smoking organizations while at the same time giving hundreds of billions to the tobacco industry? Not to mention the burning of Food Mountains created through subsidies while people on the other side of the Mediterranean are starving.

Great stuff! Funny as hell.

But it’s time to stop laughing at this miserable excuse of a comedy show – it’s time to leave.

Being Scandinavian I believe that both Sweden and Denmark should hold a new referendum, at the same time, just when we joined the unholy commissar empire of the EUSSR. And I hope the Finns will do the same – as well as all of you out there.

This new referendum must take place soon, very soon. The faster the better. Next year is probably too late, that’s how bad things are going to get very fast.

You think rioting Greeks, empty pension funds, skyrocketing unemployment, rebellious Catalonians, Portuguese exodus to Angola, crashing economies and succession hungry Scots are bad? Wait until you see what’s next on the menu.

This is the most important issue we have at the moment. Far more important than taxation levels or political color. A political party that wants to leave the EUSSR should get your vote, regardless if the party is left-wing or right-wing. We can sort out internal differences and political ideologies after we´ve gotten rid of the 30bn SEK (Sweden) pay to the commissars each year and after we gotten rid of the fact that over 70% of all laws nowadays come from Brussels.

Unified Scandinavia

Flag of Scandinavia? 

Been contemplating the notion of a unified Scandinavia for a while now and the more I think about it, the more the idea appeals to me.

First of all it the languages, history, culture and societies are very similar so we would not experience the same asymmetric problems as within the European Union (EUSSR). Secondly our politicians want another step above national, which is one of the main reasons they love UN and the Euro, so if we can give them that within a structure and with a foundation much more resilient than anything else available they may accept that option rather than a fascist EUSSR. Thirdly the unified power and strength of Scandinavia would give us a much stronger voice in the world than today were Scandinavian countries are divided and trying to voice opinions one by one.

insignia of the armed forces? 

There is really no downside - depending on how such an entity would be put together, what kind of constitution it would have and so on. But with the right people at the helm and if such an idea can be accepted by the people, why not?

Interesting idea nevertheless and I think I will play European Universalis III a bit more while contemplating how this could work. 

Flag used during the Kalmar union (1397–1523)

Storm clouds gathering

Our pinkish fluffy reality is so nice and cuddly, isn´t it? 

A confluence of events is gathering at the horizon and circling us like vultures ready to pick our decaying flesh. We´re in the middle of a maelstrom, we´re in the eye of a super hurricane, we´re on the shoreline looking up at the biggest nastiest tsunami ever seen on this planet.

It will be known as THE Greatest Depression, and there is no escaping it.

Here we are, at the raggedy edge, about to face what may very well be the last stand of the human race.

It cannot be stopped, hindered or avoided. It does not matter what Goldman Sachs puppet that will reside in the Oval Orifice Office in the land of the foreclosed and home of the serfs in 2013. It does not matter what new zombie assets the vampire Squid banks think of next. It has no meaning whatsoever what political color rules your country. You can riot, scream, complain and blame the Jews, but it will not affect the nearest years one bit.

The weird thing, which is sort of funny, is that we´ve finally reach a point where we could eliminate poverty and get rid of starvation and conflicts, and what do we do? We create the biggest calamity since the dinosaurs went extinct.

How can that not be comical?

I´ve cited what caused our impending doom many times, but just as a short recap;

1) We´ve printed too much money and interest rates were kept to low and was not set after production but rather set after political consideration.

2)  The people kept voting for the same soul-sucking entities in suits over and over again regardless of what malevolent ideas they came up with.

3)  Politicians and banksters were unified in order to cheat, steal, rob, and even murder.

4) Government grew too large and got way to intrusive

5) Entitlements grow too large and are way out of control

And finally, and most importantly, when things started to spin out of control the Money Masters and our elected frauds kept pushing for more of the very same that created our dilemma; more bureaucracy, more printing, even lower interest rates, more surveillance, more government, more printing, more money thrown at banks, more printing, new Ponzi schemes to replace the old ones and of course more printing - and so on and so forth.

Whether you blame the New World Order (NWO) or take the conspiracy thought even further into Alien and mutated bunnies territory - it too has very little meaning. The result is the same and the path very similar regardless if evil men sitting in cigar-filled room planned it all or if it’s just the cause and effect from political idiocies and people´s stupidity.

The currency- and trade wars have just begun and the continuation of banks going under, corporation firing people and rampage inflation is assured. The debt-mountains has never been bigger, the production rate never lower, and to top it all off we have the derivatives market which dwarfs anything ever seen before. Everything is manipulated and with just a little bit of ingenuity and a few millions pretty much anyone can make themselves a dirty bomb or even a nuclear one.

Tens of millions of people, mostly in Africa, are already stumbling back and forth on the starvation line, and with all of what is going on happening faster the more time passes; sickness will too become rampant.

And remember; what have they always done before when all else has failed?

They take us to war!

Safe to say; the human race has never faced anything of this magnitude before.

Oh, but can´t we reverse the process and save ourselves? Is there no hope?

Of course there are ways to reduce the worst fallout and turn things around and perhaps go back to prosperity and happiness. But you don´t want to hear about it, so move along and try to live out your life as you lived it; as a mindless zombie with fecal matters as brain. 

We spend money – Shush!

The Swedish Injustice Mentalist, Beatrice Ask, has decided that one of the government entities she´s responsible for should not disclose how they use tax money. The entity in question recently got caught spending millions on a lavish party, so of course that cannot happen again – cannot show the people how the people’s money is squandered.

This is a woman that wants to punish suspected sex-offenders before they´ve even reached a trial, a woman who loves monitoring and surveillance so much it would not surprise me a bit if her entire house is covered with screens showing normal folk going about their daily lives. This is a woman that on multiple occasions has expressed pure fascist views and now she do not want us to know what she and her cronies do with our money.

We need to watch all you do, we need to know exactly who you are and we need to steal your hard-earned cash while endorsing a totalitarian EUSSR - but what we exactly do with your money it is none of your business. All you need to be concern about is to bend over, grab your ankles and obey.