How close is it?

I’ve been going on about the end of life as we know it for many years now. Mostly I have been regarded as a tin-foil-mitten wanking conspiracist. However, I’ve been right so far…

Since two years back (since the crisis emerged in the public consciousness) I have sort of been vindicated and watching libertarians (sort off) making movies about the next upcoming disaster or write rambling about our big problems on their blogs after reading my stuff kind of tickles the nerves. I’m not saying my tedious thrown out there views are in any way the primary reason for such outburst of sanity, but I do feel like I have had a part in the revival of some peoples intellect.

The problem with such newly awakened or the ones that are (or have been) waving warning flags is that they don’t see the whole picture or fail to understand how deeply imbedded in shit we really are. Even loudmouthed insanoes like Alex Jones and Max Keiser are actually very conservative in their predictions.

And no, I am not one of those that see reptilians in the British royal family or think that Illuminati’s are puffing on fat cigars while going Moha ha ha in dark rooms. Neither am I sold on the NWO conspiracy theory or have seen too many movies about 2012. I just look at the facts, the basic fundaments and the economic numbers and see that never before in human history have so many countries been so absolutely screwed like they are right now.

Thankfully (or sadly according to me) we’ve also never been so rich. This is mainly what is keeping the scam rolling along. The general thought among libertarians and free market advocates is that globalization (the good capitalist one) and the spread of ideas across the globe have lifted billions up from poverty during the last 50 or so years and for a while we could almost believe that we had actually learned something from history. Not that things were perfect. We still had mad central banks and as a consequence inflation, we still had socialist planning and horrible government schemes like minimum wage, but mostly people seemed to understand that free markets and at least some capitalism was necessary to bring prosperity and peace to our lands.

This is almost true.

A couple of things are missing.

Firstly during the course of time inflation and mad lending practices has eaten up all economic advances. In some countries they are poorer today than 50y ago. You hardly ever hear this fact from libertarian economists. They don’t see it. They see the stuff. We have more stuff, better stuff, more shiny stuff. Cars are better, faster, and safer and we hardly need to mention things like computers and cell phones. That we are in debt is secondary…

Our entire system is built on debt. Everything around you comes with one, two or more IOU’s. 50y ago people in general put a down payment and had paid off their homes within a decade or two. Can you imagine anyone outside the elite structure managing this today? 50y ago a house cost about 3-4 times people annual salary. Today a house cost 9-10 times the average annual salary. Is it the extra stuff? Hardly.

I could go on and on but the rambling is secondary, the point is that our entire society and our way of life is built upon, with, around and contingent on debt. 99.99% of all economists say that there’s nothing wrong with this and partly I agree. Debt in itself isn’t the problem.

The problem comes into light when you see debt together with inflation and our producing capacity. The “stuff” I talk about need to be produced and seeing that we have more stuff than ever one could assume that we produce a lot. We don’t. We consume it.

You see there’s a difference between first producing and then buying versus buying on credit. The more we tap out our credit cards, the more we borrow to buy stuff - the less is over for investments and actual production. It may sound contrary and for an economist reading this he’ll never be as confused as he is right now. But the fact is that we have, since many years back, gone over the line of healthy producing-buying over to the borrowing-spend side. There’s a huge gap formed and this abyss is painted over with debt. As long as we continue to borrow to spend (exponentially) we have no problem. Central banks, inflation and a so so free market have made this idiocy possible.

No more money available for consumers to borrow so they can buy that very necessary third car? Easy. Government can print lots of new piles of cash, or (funny enough) they borrow it so the consumer can borrow it. Debt upon debt. Governments and economists love this hilarious little game. They can play Santa and make the spending binge go on and on and….

…Nooo.. they can’t. This is the problem. There is an end to it. Somewhere the limit is reached. Debt cannot be piled up indefinitely. There’s a limit.
And this is where we are today.

As said, debt in itself isn’t so bad. It can be paid back, but in steps inflation and our low producing capacity.

Inflation, which in reality is both a hidden tax and the way they fool us to think we’re getting richer, is also built into the system. This is our master’s holy cow. Inflation is good for us, at least some of it. Most likely you’ve probably heard economists try to explain how 2-3-4% inflation is a good thing? Of course 5% is slightly bad for some reason. But worst of all is deflation! Oh, the horror with lower prices and the murderess madness that comes when you can buy more for each coin. Prices need to go up, how else do we feel the need to borrow and spend more in that divine exponential way?

Remember the bailouts and stimulus packages? They printed and borrowed that money in order to encourage borrowing and spending. Inflation comes with as a bonus.

And now when some governments seem to realize their mistakes and are looking to save money and cut expenditures the entire system is in danger. So when Krugman and other hacks are saying that less spending may trigger another economic collapse they are correct. It will. But not in the way and for the reasons such idiots argue.

We have reached the end of the line. There is no more debt that can be sought up. If they print more money hyperinflation is the next thing around the corner. And the crash will happen. Nothing can stop our total financial collapse now. It is too late. If we were to borrow, spend and print even more all we would be doing is increase the flames and ensure our total demise.

We have reached the end of the line and this is where we are today.

Interesting enough this isn’t it. Even this we could manage. Inflation and sky-high debt mountains could be repaid and fixed. In a few years we could regain our producing capacity. Looking at only the mentioned problems we would still have a depression, but a minor one and not the earth shattering event now facing us.
You see there are a bunch of other factors needed to be added to the equation. The biggest is probably the derivatives scam. We have trillions upon trillions upon trillions of debt on NOTHING. Derivatives have no value. Nada. And they exist everywhere and they are seldom even mentioned. I’ve heard somewhere (don’t remember were or who said it) that the total air in derivatives can be counted up to 100 trillion dollars. If true only this little scam is enough to plunge us into total darkness.

To this we have several housing markets were banks are buying houses from themselves to hide both losses and to keep prices up. We have several commodity markets getting manipulated. We have protectionism on the rise. And the stale and stagnant government controlled societies we live in don’t help either. Needless to say the amounts, the scams and the problems are many, countless many seen globally. And these problems exists in practically every country on the planet.

To this point, despite what I wrote in the start, many of my fellow libertarians, gloomy forecasters and other thinking individuals can relate and be in agreement. They may dismiss one thing or complain about one or two numbers but in general I would say most of they are with me.

However there is one thing left. The worst thing of all. The very essence of all problems and the very entity we can trace every little disaster back to. You.
Free thinking individuals and libertarians in particular have faith in people. They believe that once the problems are obvious and the crash really starts we will suddenly become rational, see the light and bow down to the miracle that is capitalism. At least people won’t go back to worshiping funny little hysterical men with hysterical solutions who dream of world conquest. This much we have learned. Right?

Wrong.

You are an idiot and so is your mom, your neighbor and everyone around you. And when you get together in groups you even upgrade to the loony sycophant level with no concept of reality. People in general are so horrible amoebic that they believe in fairytales like welfare and cash for clunkers programs. The waste mass of anti-intellectual slugs will of course throw themselves at the feet of any well-spoken madman regardless of swastikas or red flags around him.
Why would the sheople that has voted for and cheered on the build-up of the collapse suddenly evolve synapses?

When the fierily economic inferno starts to blast its way into people’s lives they will start with the obvious targets such as sitting governments, the police and such. But then they will start to look for direction, guidance and leadership. And lord and behold, there they will be, those funny people that will welcome any cannon fodder.

This is the scenario that is most likely to occur. And with weapons of mass destruction available for any chemical student things can (and most likely will) turn very nasty and bloody.

If we have over 3 billion people on this planet 20y from now I’ll be very surprised.

So when will the fun start? My previous due-date (right now) predicted over ten years ago has actually passed, sort of. The crisis never left, they never fixed it as they want you to think. It has been here and is still here. We are actually living in a depression right now. Not according to the definition, but in all other thinkable way. The Tsunami likeness I’ve mentioned several times is very accurate. Out on the sea you can almost never see it. Even the biggest Tsunamis are hardly detectable in the middle of an ocean. But when reaching the shoreline you better watch out. The problem with this financial Tsunami is that it is not only already huge, it also increase in both speed and size for each day we allow the statism and Keynesianism to continue.

I recon we have about a year of decent normality left. Maybe two at the most. See? 2012? Uh…

Well…we have seen some gloomy sentences in the news lately and the stock markets (extremely overvalued!) have the hiccups so don’t be surprised if an increasing downward spiral spins out of control very soon.

England suck

Time for some football ramblings...

I said before the World Championship that the English should be lucky if they get past the group stage, and they were. Playing games so badly that they may have been the worst team to watch in the tournament they didn’t deserve to go through to get outplayed by Germany.

The English team is by far the most overrated national team on home soil I can think off. They have one decent attacker, a half winger, a poorly put together midfield and a stubby defense. Why do English people think they can win anything?

Is it the coach fault? To some degree yes, but no-one can do magical spells to transform mediocre overpaid players into a killing machine that wins tournaments.

As a Swede maybe someone thinks I should elevate Sven-Göran Eriksson, but I won’t. I give him an okay period and on a couple of occasions the English team can blame bad luck for not going further in previous tournaments under my countryman’s leadership. He did squeeze the best out the team on a couple of occasions and should be remembered as doing an okay job, but as said, no-one can transform a bad team into champions.

If you were to put together a football team and had unlimited resources – how many English players would make it? I wouldn’t choose a single one. Maybe Rooney would make it to the bench, maybe, but otherwise? And this is the problem, not the coach. I can find players in pretty much every national team on the planet that, depending on how you put together the team, would be considered. But not one from the English team.

Owen Hargreaves is the only decent defensive midfielder, but I can easily count 30-40 players that surpass him. John Terry at his peak might break into a top ten list of defenders, but certainly won’t today. Gerrard and Lampard are good midfielders but both rely heavily on teammates and need support, what English player can provide that? The goalkeepers are competent but I can find competent goalies in Estonia without even trying. Worse still is the right and left midfield. When did a English side have a really good player on either of those positions? Beckham is the only one that comes to mind over a 20y period - he was an excellent complement always doing his job, always running and doing what he does best, but he was never someone to build a team on.

The big teams of the world can muster two, maybe three whole teams that wouldn’t disappoint. England cannot produce one. So why the hell does the English people think so highly of their national side? Because of the Premiership? Who are the best players and coaches there again...? The average English side knows how to kick, run and fight through a game and they do it very well. Passing? Technique? Not so much. England has 50 teams that do perform pretty well, but could never surmount to anything else but “pretty well”. The three, four or five top teams are excellent but mainly so because of foreign imports, foreign coaches and foreign tactics. And how many really good goal scorers are English in the entire English league system? 2? 3? Even my country Sweden has better attackers.

To change this three things need to be done.

Firstly get a National Team coach that can build for the future. Capello is a great coach, but not someone to rely on to build a team 5-6y into the future. This is the reason he should leave, not because the national side is horrible at the moment. Arsene Wenger would be perfect. Maybe Ferguson despite his age. And both the people and the press need to see this and get behind it. Maybe the national team will lose half of the games in the beginning. So what? Build for the future and let them do it. See it for what it is and fuck the upcoming European championship 2012. If you get there, fine, but if not it’s not the whole world. You’re not good enough to win it anyway, start with the crying when you actually have a chance.

Secondly English players need to get out in the world. Premier league may be one of the best leagues in the world, but English players need to gain experience, get new influences and see new things. I cannot mention a single English player outside the British Isles. This must change! Send a couple of youngsters to Ajax, Barcelona, Werder Bremen or Bocca Juniors, they know how to build good players. Send coaches and entire teams out in the world every summer to learn and experience new things. Take what is good and bring it home and adopt it to the English mentality. And stop paying ridiculous sums for mediocre players. An English player whose equals you can find on the continent for a third of the price isn’t worth it just because he’s English. Too much national pride, too much elevation for the English players. They are not good enough. Face it and change it.

And third, find the heart again. Even when British teams are not so good they have, historically, still managed to fight, run and bring a huge heart to the game which can rock any team. Attitude, fighting spirit and heart can take you very far. English players will never be better than Brazilians comes to technique or better then Italians comes to defense. You also lack some organization which is why Nordic and German teams still beat you again and again. But with new influences, new training tactics, more players out in the world and with a team built for the future that extra beating heart can make you win trophies.

Lastly I need to really point out that many people laugh at you every time it comes to world championship and both the English players and press thinks you can win the tournament. It’s ridiculous and has so been for decades. You’re not good enough. Most of the world’s pundits outside Britain know this - get real. Even the best teams take a game at the time. Some players may mention holding the trophy, but mentally they prepare for their next opponent, not a distant final. Probably the best thing Sven-Göran actually said and did and probably also why he wasn’t so liked in the end. He’s a realist and takes things step by step. The English seem to think the team should prepare for the final even before the tournament starts. Idiots.

More things that didn’t happen

As we all know societies with straight gun-control were only the police are supposed to be armed no-one ever gets shot. This is certainly true for Sweden were two people didn’t get gunned down last night in Malmö and last night a young man didn’t get his home perforated by several armed assailant in a suburb to Stockholm.

Nope, that never happened.

And of course the police aren’t looking for the armed robbers that performed a heist recently. Nope, no such thing.

We can also be reasonably sure that such none-events are usually, but not always, carried out by armed immigrants disillusioned by government policies. Writing such things automatically labels one as a racist so just in case that epithet isn’t thrown at me; it is usually a black/Hispanic/Arabic young man caught in some drug mafia because politicians think that drugs should be illegal while people demand lots of drugs and he’s is tired of being pushed around and getting called “weak” by authorities that are working under the assumption that they can ease his anger by throwing ‘free stuff’ at him.

While the police beat him up well-spoken elected frauds are telling him they are his friends and will increase his welfare check if he votes correctly.

But that scenario didn’t happen either and such people don’t exist. Nope, nothing to see here folks. Move along.

Some people are doing something

The reoccurring and close to traditional protests at G-20/G-8 meetings, latest seen in Toronto, is mostly a lefty idiocy. There are anarchist thugs, inbreed communists and your average run of the mill socialist assholes. Generally speaking the ones hurling bottles at the police, torching cars and screaming intellectual sentences like “uff, uff” or “ugha ugha” are rather part of the problem and all they are really doing is worsening the situation.

Still, I cannot help feeling slightly sympathetic. They are doing something. Reacting.

I have hardly anything in common with these idiots. They want more of the same socialism that brought us the problems in the first place, they want closed markets, they want to put an end to the last tiny remanence of capitalism we have and they destroy private property to get their voices out. Nothing of this speaks to me. I once argued that the best thing we could do is to put tanks on the streets and run them all over, to a large degree I still think that.

Still, I cannot help applauding most of their actions.

While our saviors and benefactors in very expensive suits dine and feast after debating how much more Keynesianism they will throw into the financial fierily Armageddon they have created, the black hooded lefties are fighting the hired guns of the police to bring attention to want is really going on. And what are you doing?

The elected frauds and pranksters you have elected are, together with big banks and certain shadowy groups, robbing us blind right now and they have been doing so for many decades. And what are you doing to stop it? Voting for the same again? Sitting at home and maybe, perhaps complaining at the dinner table? Nothing at all?

Have you ever wondered; if all political sides are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits? If all politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes? If all politicians want full employment and want to help the poor, WHY do we have high unemployment and so many poor people?

Consider this; 50y ago in a western household a family could survive on one salary. Sure they didn’t have the same level of technology, but they survived, many even thrived, and most didn’t have debt coming out of their ears despite owning a house and a couple of cars. Today we need at least two salaries in a household to get by, and this with a higher level of technology and much higher productivity. Why do you think that is? Have you ever asked that question?

We should be able to live on half of one salary today compared to 50 years ago; instead it is the other way around. HAVE YOU WONDERED WHY THIS IS?

For many years - in my opinion since the dawn of agriculture - we have had the means and wealth to feed, clothe and equip every single person on this planet. Several times over. Still a billion people are starving, and even in the ‘modern’ developed countries there’s massive unemployment and misery. HAVE YOU EVER WONDERED WHY THIS IS?

Our Integrity is gone, completely. CCTV cameras are popping up everywhere; internet is roamed by supercomputers and thousands of faceless bureaucrats looking for a way to lock you up. There’s not a single country on this planet that allows citizens to have basic human rights. Most of us (all) are controlled, monitored, checked, bullied, watched, inspected, spied upon, directed, numbered, regulated, enrolled, indoctrinated, preached at, controlled, estimated, valued, censured and commanded from the cradle to the grave. And the funny thing is; we are ourselves paying for this pleasure!

The developed world's economic policy has of late been dominated by the revival of the old insane idea that vast amounts of public spending could prevent deflation, cure a recession, and ignite a new era of government-led prosperity. That this notion is a mathematical impossibility and lacking all forms of logical and intellectual reasoning has been ignored. Even funnier, you have all voted for it, wanting it, rooting for it. And the stone throwing lefties at these summits should be happy - it’s basically their ideas.

Something is seriously wrong with the world and the best indication of this is how good ordinary people are sitting at home getting raped, pillaged and robbed with a smile on their faces while the ones that should be happy are out destroying cars.

Our puppet masters and the ones you’ve been voting for are setting up the biggest crash and the largest tsunami wave of financial disaster ever seen by mankind. The, in comparison, miniscule depression of the 30’s will seem like walk in the park. You thought that the crisis was over didn’t you? Think again. It never left. It has been here all the time, just under the surface bubbling away, gaining momentum. At these G-20 meetings they are discussing how to save their own asses, how to avoid getting stringed up in lampposts in the near future. Because when you ordinary folks finally snap - and you will - one of the first targets for your anger will be the soul-sucking ghouls of politics and they know it.

The socialist hooded thugs have only gone apeshit before you will, sadly for the wrong reasons, but nevertheless they are doing what we all should be doing and what we will be doing soon. Very soon.

So, with that sure as hell prediction in mind is it then any wonder that a small portion of me roots for a gang of leftie misfits throwing bottles?

Home alone?

As a sexy young thing all alone in a dark house with a murderess stranger with a knife on his way in - there’s nothing to do but to get raped, mutilated and killed. Right?

Wrong…

Problem with Dick bloodflow

Apparently the former vice (giving) head of state is at the hospital again. Not a shooting accident mind you just yet another heart incident. The war criminal, that also have been revealed to covering up that hundreds of innocent men were sent to the Guantánamo Bay prison camp because ‘they’ feared that releasing them would harm the push for war in Iraq and the broader War on Terror, was admitted to the hospital Friday after experiencing discomfort.

Cheney's heart attack earlier this year was his fifth since age 37. A heart attack occurs when blood flow to the heart muscle is blocked.

Me I believe, honestly believe, that the same problem exists for the illicit Dick comes to his little tiny namesake. Isn’t the heart responsible for pumping blood to all limbs? I’ve said it before but it should be said again; one haft to assume that the reason why certain men want to build more ships is that like most men they like big machines with big engines that fire big missiles because they have a deep seated need to overcompensate for their own shortcomings.

And you don’t need to be an arch feminist to see how phallus shaped rockets, phallus shaped missiles and bullets are used in this battle for size measurement.

Maybe a good idea is to offer free extension operations to all men in governing positions?

Anyway, let’s hope the mass murdering thug in question leaves us this time. Not the death hundreds of thousands of murdered would wish for, but a death nevertheless. This fucking dick will not be missed.

From the urbandictionary.com:

1. dick chaney
Shooting someone with a shotgun at close range.
I ran up on this dude with the shotty and Dick Chaney'd his ass!

2. Dick chaney
The hunter of hunters. He will shoot you with a shotgun...hunting some of the smallest birds out there. Good job!
I'm sorry, but I'm in this hospital. Why? Oh, I got dick chaney'd.

3. Dick Chaney
Sexual manuver, in which one person ejectulates into the face of their partner
I pulled a Dick Chaney on Lisa last night and had a hunting accident all over her face

A couple of ’I told you so’

Firstly the oily screw-ups in the Aegean are finally doing one thing right – selling islands and their heritage to foreign interests. Not that it really matters, at least not the nearest years. In the long run some foreigners may create some production, introduce one or two rational thoughts or simply bring in some cashola. But the 12-13% (probably more) in deficits and the sky-high debts cannot be solved by selling some islands. It is a long term plus and as such I applaud it, but, as said, it won’t matter, the Greeks are toast.

Gold is at an all time high again. Remember how pundits have again and again claimed that the limit has been reached? There are tons of manipulations and I won’t go into all the scams going on, but Gold is still a great buy even if the price is kept ‘too high’ because the next crash (soon) will double or more the price. Again we see pundits and knowitallidiots saying that gold can only go down. They’ve been saying that for ten years now. They are idiots and you’re an idiot if you listen.

In the US foreclosures are beating record after record. Authorities, banks and pundits are pondering on how this can be solved. Of course more regulations and looser lending practices is the way out… The latest is that homeowners should keep their homes (which they do already) despite defaulting on their loans and having no prospects. And I cannot stop laughing…

In Eastern and southern Africa the famine catastrophe is picking up speed. Over 10 million people are at risk of hunger in the Sahel before the September harvests, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization’s (FAO). In Niger, about half of the 13.4 million inhabitants are facing hunger. Up to two million Chadians and hundreds of thousands of Mauritanians and Malians also need assistance. I wrote on this blog over a year ago that if our “saviors” Oduma, froggy Sarkozy, Merkel and the rest of the criminals are allowed to go through with their mad schemes tens of millions of Africans would die. We are not really there yet, but play with the thought that the next harvest fails or a couple of new warlords start having fun. Because that never happens in Africa… Or let’s say that the world plummet down that abyss am waiting and rooting for. Either way, or probably both at the same time, millions, tens of millions will die and in reality it is your fault. You have voted for it. Well, Africans in general are idiots so they have themselves to blame, but your part in this is also clear

Be back soon with more ‘I told you so’…

So sad - the Brown Gorgon has soon left the building...

Seriously, I'm going to miss the one-eyed soul sucker

I told you so - Part 8693

EU finance ministers have agreed on emergency measures worth 500bn euros. The 16 members of the single currency bloc will have access to 440bn euros of loan guarantees and 60bn euros of emergency European Commission funding. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) will also contribute up to 250bn euros.

You know what this is? It’s the end. This is it for the Euro - the deathblow. But even worse, this is the end of European unity and peace. And no, that is not a joke. When the sharks are circling the bleeding victim, are they nice to each other and say “please, you go first”?

It’s going to be a feeding frenzy. Italy, Spain, Portugal will compete for that cash like a pack of starved Hyenas. Bulgaria, Latvia and the rest that has their currencies tied to the Euro will want their piece.

And it won’t stop there either. France and Belgium with their completely mad pension schemes need their cut and so it goes on and on. Before you know it, another package will be needed. Funniest of all, the big problems and the actual culprits are almost totally ignored.

Can’t you see were this is going? I can, I could have told you about this and described this very thing ten years ago. I still have a proposal I put forward within the, today, ruling party of Sweden (Moderaterna) 2002 on a disc. In it I describe ‘spookily’ exact, almost 100% accurate, what is happening right now and argued that the Euro is doomed to fail and the Eurozone along with the EU will crash and burn.

But there’s nothing spooky about it. Its basic math, common sense and an actual thinking process (a short one without fatigue, but nevertheless…).

Want to know where this is heading? Take a look in the review mirror and go back 80 years or so. We’ve already seen emerging “right-wing” parties all over the place and their friendly neighborhood companions (with virtually the same policies) waving red flags are already taking to the streets. And we are just getting started.

They are setting up the biggest crash and the largest tsunami wave of financial disaster ever seen by mankind. The, in comparison, miniscule depression of the 30’s will seem like walk in the park. Do you really think that no funny little men with hysterical solutions to a hysterical people will emerge? Have we really learned from history? If you do think that way, you’re an idiot. But we already knew that since you have voted for it, wanted it, rooted for it and now it’s getting to be harvest time.

Wanna know what the real problem is? Sure we can blame banksters, politicians, a useless media and central banks, and those people should be stringed up, but the actual problem, the main villain in this piece of theatric is right there in the mirror.

Take a good hard loooong look at yourself.

You are a useless smelly cunt that has voted for the same elite to rule your life over and over again. You don’t complain when you should, and you do complain when you shouldn’t. They pass laws to control you, and all you ever do is trash them at the dinner table and then you go and vote for the same soul sucking entities you have always voted for.

You are an idiot and that’s what’s wrong with the world.

Spain, Italy, Greece, Portugal and many others are bottomless pits. We can throw ten times as much money at them. It won’t help. All the ruling righteous elite (which you have voted for) are doing is destroying our future.

And where do all that cash come from? The sky? Santa? And what about their own rules? Wasn’t there supposed to be a rule that prevented stuff like this?

Maybe our master’s think that throwing big words and big sums around will scare the market straight and that the money will never actually be used. Riiiiight, and then the tooth fairy will wave her magic wand…

Well, you will continue to vote for it, won’t you? And that’s all that really matters for the four-winged mischievous ghouls in suits.

Dance puppets. Dance.

I have said it before, and I will say it again. Get stocked up. Sell your house or any other fixed property while you can, get rid of all debt and load up with suger, batteries, candles, dried-up food packages and guns. Get ready people, it is coming, and it is closer then you think.

I told you so - Part 8692

So the financial markets got a hiccup. Big whoop. Dow Jones down 700 points you say? That is nothing; financial markets should be crashing. Completely. And they will.

And on a Friday? What are the odds... :)

Remember how I said a year ago that after the first Q of 2010 we would see the first waves? Well, actually I said it as far back as 2000, but who’s checking...

Just as the latest minor US housing crash which gave us a severe recession, this is just a ripple on the sea. A small breeze. The worst is yet to come.

Journalists, useless as ever, are scratching their heads. And of course useless bureaucrats will ‘investigate’ the incident. Haha… you cannot make this stuff up.

I’m not even going to try to explain this shit anymore. If you buy the official (confusing) story, go ahead. Me, I am fleeing to a deserted island to grow my own crops, or maybe I’ll move up in the mountains somewhere.

Just remember, when it all comes crashing down, when that despair hits, when they are throwing more stimulus around and life as we know it disappear, then do remember that; I told you so.

Back again, and so say all of us

Been busy with a lot of things (drinking and whoring) and I sort of needed a time off. Not just from blogging. Internet, cellphones and similar stupidities take a lot from normal social interacting.

Anyway, I haven’t missed anything. The economy is still getting better - while we lose purchasing power and the bubbles keep growing.

Off to check my Facebook and all of my email accounts now. Will stop by for a more insightful comment later on.

When you like and vote for big Government

The sixth extinction - resurrection

Billions of years of life on this planet have gone through several devastating disasters. Scientists have figured out that mass-extinctions have occurred five times before. Each earth-shattering event has destroyed a ¼ or more of all the beings living here.

The question isn’t IF it will happen again, the question is when.

Or maybe the question should be; by what means will this happen?

Homo sapiens are by all accounts a young species. Our kind have only roamed the earth for 200 000 years or so. Even if we during that time have experienced an Ice-age as well as large meteorites crashing and giant volcanoes erupting, we’ve yet to see anything really cataclysmic.

Isn’t it time soon?

The fifth (and latest) major extinction circa 65 millions of years ago eliminated > 17% of families on the planet, including the Dinosaurs. Most likely caused by one (possibly multiple) collisions between Earth and an extraterrestrial body (probably cometary), although some geologists point to a great volcanic event as a possible alternative.

The third major Extinction circa 245 millions of years ago, probably had the same cause as the fifth one, the others is generally regarded to have to do with major, and quite sudden, shifts in climate.

With this in mind it seems that climate change (a real one, not the made-up manmade one) or a large celestial crash should have the lowest odds in Vegas. There are however other possibilities.

Massive solar flare eruptions may both change climate and our geological situation at the same time as such an event would knock out most of our technology. We have cosmic rays from space as a constant threat. Reversal of the magnetic poles (especially if it happens fast) is also a possibility. The introduction of some alien substance, intelligent or not, will also be in this category. Just to mention a few.

But what about ourselves? Couldn’t we do it? Of course we could.

Some mean this is already on the way.

The transformation of the landscape, the overexploitation of species and, of course, pollution is said to contribute to the 30 000 species that go into the light each year. Although such doomsday sayers rarely count the number of new species emerging at the same time or even contemplate that many of those animals would go extinct regardless of human intervention, we can’t really dismiss it either.

My question in this scenario is; who cares? I mean why should be bother with useless animals rendered extinct? I don’t see the point. Only the animals we have use for or the ones who’re vital for ecosystems we depend on should be incorporated into any calculation.

The sixth extinction will only be dangerous if it happens to us, us humans. I don’t care if Polar Bears or any Condor turns into rotting corpses, why would I?

We could talk nuclear holocausts and I do admit it is a possibility, but not very likely one, at least not without other events preceding. It is far more likely that a comet strikes again. But wouldn’t a total break-down of our societies into anarchy, disaster and mass-starvation that will kill tens (maybe hundreds) of millions of people be the worst scenario?

I would think so, and this is also the only real threat. If a comet comes our way today or very soon, maybe we cannot do anything about it. The same goes for solar flares and cosmic rays. But give the human race enough time and we will come up with solid defenses against any such events. I’m absolutely sure about that.

What we don’t have a defense against is ourselves, and here’s where the real threat is.

And I’m not talking any made-up hoax about over-exploitation or the scam of manmade global warming. Such madness has nothing to do with this.

History shows us that the only thing we excel at more than our magical ability to survive and come up with new ways of adapting, is our imagination when it comes to kill each other.

There’s literarily no end to ways of killing other humans. Everything from The iron maiden to socialism, from stoning to The Pear of Anguish to burning people alive.
Instrumental in this task throughout the ages have been government. Not only the only entity able to start wars, it has also, with good aid from different religions, been the main inventor of torture devices and different ways of execution.

Certainly we can then say in our time and age, with the re-emerging of the state as our main contributor and effecter into human life; that we’re getting into more and more trouble. The bigger and stronger government, the more likely our doom seem.
So when our contemporary societies are heading for social- and economic upheavals with a very likely outcome of bigger and stronger government I cannot help thinking that the sixth extinction is closing in.

If my thoughts about our economic mess holds and the coming years will dwarf the “Great Depression” in severity, and if this leads to, what is usually the case, totalitarian ideas growing and that some of those funny little men with funny little plans comes to power, aren’t we then very close?

Just imagine if we would have had weapons of mass destruction available back in the 30’s. How would our world look today if that had been the case?

Personally I would prefer the comet or Alien scenario. At least then we could go out with a bang against an outside threat. Sadly even such an event, if we survived it, would be claimed by government. Surely they saved us? And so we’re back into the circle of expanding government and us closing in on our own destruction.

I think it is very ironic and quite amusing, that the most intelligent species ever evolved on this planet with the ability to survive and thrive only surpassed by the cockroach, will destroy itself. As long as collectivism and statism is growing, that’s the end of the road we’re heading for. My hope is that we go fast; I’ve always hated long goodbyes. So to you lefties and other lunatics out there; speed it up.

How to waste your vote

The Swedish Pirate Party is losing ground, both in the number of members and in polls that show the momentum gained from trials, Piratebay and the fascist monitoring society isn’t doing it for them anymore in the run-up to the general election.

This is not surprising. EU-elections are one thing, that’s about mismanagement, protests and something far away we can send rouge elements to in order to make a point. General elections are more about things closer to us such as taxes, pensions and who will be our voice in the world.

That EU nowadays makes over 70% of our laws goes by pretty unnoticed - electing 365 criminals who will dictate exiting rules such as highway speed isn’t.

Integrity, CCTV and YouTube videos will only get you so far. A party that is only discussing integrity and have an anti-surveillance stand without explaining the impact on pension schemes, the number of daycare centers or the level of taxation will not get sufficient support. Either the pirates will support the current semi-fascist useless bunch of soul-sucking entities now ruling us, or they will support the leftie nightmare of communist ghouls and tree hugging freaks that with our current world and its dilemmas will destroy us all. The pirate’s decision will be based on what side that will eliminate the most monitoring.

Is that enough to vote for pirates? Do voters feel excited by this?

I don’t like the current Swedish administration, too controlling, too fascist, too much central planning and they are members of the Church of Climatology which they try to force down the public’s throats. I cannot stand the ministers, and the Prime Mentalist looks like a cartoon character. The Swedish leadership should be thrown out of power.

But the hypocrisy and utter madness of the Socialists are even worse. And they have the ugliest leader ever seen; a person that’s been caught cheating on her taxes and used government credit-cards for her own personal amusement and hired black laborers.

In the end it doesn’t really matter though. The policies are almost identical, only the insane can see any difference between 1-2% higher or lower taxes – which is the only distinction between the two sides.

And it seems that the only real conflict so far is a system of household services tax relief. Apparently pretty popular but the leftie opposition has declared it will abolish if it wins the autumn election.

I’m against this idea myself. Don’t get me wrong, I think it is great to lower taxes, but taxation shouldn’t be arbitrary and focused on a particular area. Better to lower them across the board and make them equal no matter what area or market we’re talking about. One particular section of the economy shouldn’t get tax relief when others don’t. That’s just wrong.

Anyway, to no surprise the Socialist opposition has several senior politicians that make good use of the system. Do as we say, don’t do as we do.

Something that has been going on for quite a while now is the merger of politicos within and in-between political parties. They are all becoming the same party. The political party. This is particularly noticeable whenever something threatens the hegemony of The Political Party. If a threat of alternative emerges that loathes the EU, wants to bring the problems with immigration up on the table or someone want stop the Orwellian nightmare from coming true, or if someone says that their Church of Climatology is a fraud, then watch The Political Party go to work.

Well, actually this merger has already happened, maybe not totally, it is still possible to find slim differences, at least in the rhetoric, but in actuality and as in consequence for your vote the disparity is hardly detectable.

A couple of more elections and they can merge into one.

And politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

And have you ever wondered, if both sides are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits? If all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes? If both sides want full employment and want to help the poor, WHY do we have high unemployment and so many poor people?

All everyone of them want is for you to be a good little citizen that vote and don’t mind being constantly under surveillance and say ‘thank you’ when getting pushed around by faceless bureaucrats. The problems they generate are supposed to keep you on your toes and you should pay attention to what they do to solve the problems they created. You should keep running in that wheel, never mind the banksters behind the curtain.

So why even bother to vote?

Isn’t even the 25min it takes to vote a waste of time?

Not to mention the immorality of voting in the first place. All you actually do is to vote about your neighbor’s money and who among the elitists that will control that money. No matter how you look at it, it cannot be ethically correct.

Here’s a thought. If you really want to vote and actually want to fight the powers that be, if you really want to roll back the surveillance society and stick it to the man, why not put that vote on the Libertarian Party? These are the guys that everyone hates, and if you ask Politicians and The Political Party who their main enemy is, libertarians will top that list.

http://www.liberalapartiet.se/

Is it a wasted vote? Sure, in one way, the libertarian party has no chance to gain any real power, at least not in the nearest hundred years.

On the other hand consider what the libertarian promise to you as a voter.

Libertarians only say that if you work hard enough you might get rich, and in the libertarian world people would be free to explore their own potential and have free choices without surveillance. That’s pretty much it.

They don’t promise you happiness, money, food, jobs, love or honor. Libertarians are telling people that if they want those things they need to get it for themselves, work for it, sweat, and really put the effort in.

‘The Political Party’ say they will fix it for us, with our money and as they see fit. And you love that don’t you? Sure you do. But otherwise you do have an alternative to waste that voting on.

How do you define Irony?

Bubble oh you sweet bubble

It will hold, no needle can penetrate it!

There are two things about housing and home ownership they don’t normally tell you. They want you to think about borrowing and spending, and not making rational decisions.

‘They’ in this little exercise are real-estate brokers, banks, central banks, politicians, economists and lots of other criminals.

The first thing you should ignore, according to our enemies, is actual disposable income versus the prices (and level of borrowing) on housing. Historically speaking the price of a home have been about three times that of peoples annual income. This line of about three times our annual income, on average, has been true in every country and regardless of time in history. The ONLY time this hasn’t been true is during times maddening bubbles.

The second thing they want to shrug your shoulders at and go ‘mah’ about is the correlation between the prices of housing versus the price of renting.

You see the cost of renting should never be cheaper than that of a bought home. If it is, you can automatically assume something fishy and very smelly is going on. Sadly this correlation has been distorted through government housing projects, taxes, complex building regulations and so on. But as a general rule of thumb this is still true.

Let’s say you can rent an apartment for $1000/month. Next to that apartment is another one with similar size and standard that you can buy. If the total cost per month for buying that other apartment is, including mortgage and other costs such as repairs, exceeds $1000/month, why would you buy? A rational person might do it anyway if there’s some additional value such as independence in owning or a better view. But even then it is a bad way of spending your money.

So there is only one reason to buy such a home that is clearly overpriced from the start, and that is to speculate on it. Prices never go down on a home, right? Always go up, up, and away…

These two facts have all throughout history always been true, only a fool would think it isn’t true also today. But as usual Einstein’s definition of insanity holds true.

Lately in Sweden there’s been a debate over whether or not a housing bubble has been in the making.

Let’s first look at the basic fundamentals and then go back to the two truths above.

A) Housing prices have risen with over 150% since 1997. This is one of the highest increases in the world and it’s a bigger increase than in the US before their minor crash ( a bigger one is about to follow).

B) To put it in other terms, the price increase has been an average of 8% every year since 1996.

C) The few countries with a bigger rally such as Spain and Ireland have already experienced a decrease in pricing -although not really a crash just yet. The main reason why those countries haven’t crashed yet is partly government madness and partly banks have been buying housing from themselves to keep prices up (watch out for Spain…).

D) Swedes debt ratio to income is at a record height. We’re more in debt today that we were before the 1990-crisis and it’s higher than the American equivalent.

E) Swedish interest rates are lower than European counterparts, and keep in mind almost everyone have been trying to keep interest rates down, and in this mad race for bubbles Sweden is in the lead.

F) The Swedish Government owned lending institute of SBAB (think Fanny and Freddie on steroids) has been fueling the market with increasingly generous lending and very low interest rates. It is not uncommon for the lender to borrow close to and sometimes over 100%.

G) The central bank has thrown hundreds of billions of freshly printed money at the commercial banks. They don’t use all of this money; most of it actually goes back to the central bank with interest which you, the taxpayer, are paying for. But some of it is used and the amount that hasn’t been propping up the stock market goes to real-estate and housing.

H) During the worst crisis since the 30’s prices haven’t just been going up in Sweden, they have reached record heights.


Before we continue, there are some additional facts you should know before making the judgment whether or not there’s a housing bubble. Since the government in Sweden practically runs, controls, subsidize, tax and regulate every single part of the Swedish housing market it isn’t always easy to see what fundamentals are a problem and what is not. For instance the black market of renting is massive and make up 40% of the renting market. This makes renting more expensive, and it makes some of the problems less visible.

And normally (maybe about to change) renting costs is set in central negotiations because in Sweden socialism is what matters. This means that renting a flat in a rundown town out in the wilderness has about the same cost as a flat of the same size in the centre of Stockholm. This in itself is enough to cause distortions and bubbles.

Now, let’s go back to my two basic statements:

Swedish median annual income: SEK 225 000 ($ 31 500)

Average price for a home: SEK 2 million ($282 000) – a new record

282000/31500 or 2M/225K = 9

So the average home cost about 9 years worth of income today. Or, as said above, 3 times as much as it should be.

And do I even need to show you the ‘owning’ of a home versus renting one? All I can say is, if you’re buying with this rent-to-buy ratio which is 1:1 at the very best, and normally about 1:2 – well then you’re an idiot.

So does Sweden have a housing bubble?

Well, with all I’ve just said and during a time of high unemployment (officially 9%) and within a recession (in reality a depression). With companies doing pretty badly and the world is still in a shaky condition. Country after country is closing in on default and there are still wars raging in oil producing countries.

What do you think?

We already know what the central bank, politicians, the commercial banks, SBAB, several economists and lots of other con-artists are saying. And those folks are never wrong, right? Nooo, just keep on borrowing, buy it all, and keep increasing your debts. No worries. The Doctor will protect us from the intergalactic clockwork androids from the future who wants to use our brains to power their spaceships…

Invisible Empire

As said before, I don’t buy all of this conspiracy talk. But some of it is true and the quest for a New World Order is one of those truths.

You don’t haft to buy into everything and eat it all up, I don’t, but the general idea and the basics are true and real. And in my mind the gloomy forecast of our future that is painted in this movie is in the making and will soon be a reality, and you don’t need to live in a trailer with a tin-foil hat on to see this coming over the horizon.

If the New World Order is a Malthusian dictatorship being created by shadowy figures or if you believe it to be a benign UN creation is up to you to decide, either way it is coming.

So this movie is a good way of getting one side of the coin. Really good information throughout but as usual with these sorts of production I cannot help feeling the moviemakers miss some additional facts and they don’t always back up their claims in a way I as a product of academia feel is adequate.

Oh, and who the hell cares if the Bush family and their friends are all gay? They are fascist idiots no matter who they fuck. Why was that in the movie? Stupid.

Maybe they should choose one part of this conspiracy thought and elaborate on that? But then again, it has been done before and by others, so I would see this flick as a good way of getting a wake-up call.

Watch it, it is worth the 2+ hrs

Invisible Empire A New World Order Defined Full (Order it at Infowars.com)

Iran VS United States

Following a debate on Facebook a “friend” ended our ‘friendship’ all of a sudden because I argued against him when he said it would be a good idea to nuke Iran since they apparently support terrorists.

The point I made was that the US is a much worse terrorist state in comparison with Iran looking at statistics and then I tried to explain why I put forward this controversial opinion.

He saw me as a friend of the dictatorship in Iran and apparently he detests ‘libertarians’ although claiming to be an objectivist and a lover of Ayn Rand. He’s also a member of the supposed libertarian party of Sweden and claims to be an advocate of capitalism and freedom…

I’ve been thinking to become a member and at least be a silent partner of the mentioned party, but with members like this guy..?

Anyway, to explain my view.

I never said USA was a totalitarian society. However America is certainly not a free country, not even close. And given time and the current path the country is on I would say it is only a matter of time before the US ends up on the same ballpark as Iran.

And then comes to the statistics. You don’t need WikiLeaks videos or watch how private contractors shoot at innocent civilians, you don’t need to read about how they have slaughtered entire families and tried to cover it up, you don’t need to discuss drones murdering thousands of fleeing refugees or even discuss the “reasons” to go to war and kill about a million Muslims in the first place. All you need to do is the check the overall picture and the facts.

How many wars have Iran started lately? How many innocent civilians have died because of Iran? Who is causing millions of refugees and destroying homes by the thousands, USA or Iran? How many countries does Iran have troops in and how many countries are they occupying? How many hundreds of civilians from countries across the globe have Iran kidnapped and tortured without any due process as of late?

I could go on for a long time; the picture is however very clear and only idiots refuse to see it.

United States of America isn’t a free country and the crimes against humanity its administrations have been and are committing do by far exceed that of Iran.

This isn’t in any way a defense of the Iranian priesthood or the dictatorship of fanatics dwelling in that stupidity of a country. I would also like to point out that America is still a good place filled with good people, and given the choice of which country to support, move to or in any other way stand behind I would chose US over Iran everyday of the week. This however isn’t the point and not the discussion.

Would Ayn Rand have supported the US committing warcrimes, the occupation of several countries and throwing trillions of dollars at the military when the US economy is defaulting? Would she have been sympathetic towards rebuilding poppy fields and handing them over to warlords? If given the chance, would the lady have thought it was a good idea to blow up families and destroy entire villages with very questionable motives?

I think most of us that actually like her writings and ideas can figure out the answer.

And how much pro-capitalism is it to not acknowledge banksters trickery, weapon cartel’s cons and US administrations shadowy reasons for both the wars and the nationalization of the economy?

Thankfully I hadn’t yet paid my contribution to the supposed Libertarian Party of Sweden. Not that I mind a difference of opinion. I hate religions, I like the royal family and to a certain extent I support the pro-life movement. Things many libertarians don’t agree with me on.

The basics for any libertarian stand is however the same all throughout the world, and for the love of Beelzebub I cannot figure out why someone writing, in honest, that nuking Iran is a good thing while refusing to see US faults has anything whatsoever to do with libertarianism.

I told him he was twelve when refusing to discuss the subject, but what he really should be checking is his views and see if he really understands Ayn Rand teachings and can claim to be a libertarian.

Where are the environmentalists!?

An immense plume of volcanic ash cast a silent pall over the skies of Northern Europe on Thursday, grounding air traffic across Britain, Scandinavia and elsewhere, halting flights to and from North America, stranding travelers and isolating much of the continent to an extent that was without precedent in recent memory.

The culprit: an Icelandic volcano that could continue spewing grit into the atmosphere for months or years to come.

The material spewed by the volcano consists of fine, sharp-edged particles of rock and glass, most of them ranging in size from about one-twelfth of an inch in diameter down to about 1/25,000th of an inch, and they are capable of circulating in the upper atmosphere for months. If they are inhaled by humans or animals, they can damage air passages. If they are sucked in by a jet engine, they can shut the engine down.

The most abundant gas typically released into the atmosphere from volcanic systems is water vapor (H20), followed by carbon dioxide (C02) and sulfur dioxide (S02).

All three can contribute to climate change. Although the level of carbon dioxide (C02) is only about a tenth of that of human any normal year nowadays, over the millennia it's no contest. Also certain years or when the larger ones erupt they can reach or maybe even surpass human activity.

I will not go into all the other gases or what impact this has on life on the planet. Partly because no-one really knows and partly because that’s not my level of expertise.

What we can be sure about however is that emission like this Icelandic one is, according to ‘the green’ tree-hugging freaks, the same as murder. Also since a proposal have been put forward to declare mass destruction of ecosystems ("ecocide") a crime on par with genocide, it raises a lot of questions about how we should handle volcanoes.

Is the Icelandic volcano(s) liable for murder, "ecocide" and can be sued for the economic cost of delayed flights?

I also noticed that the heat melted the surrounding ice and flows of meltwater started coming off the glacier. A glacier melting eh? How horrific, that has never happened before and should also render lots of sleepless nights to the doomsayers within the ‘green’ asylum. It also caused flodding, another scary thing that ONLY comes from manmade global warming.

Someone argued that this is how the ‘greens’ what our future to look – no air travel. But the small relief the environment might have from this pause cannot even compare to the volcano and its activity. It would have been better, in the eyes of the righteous ‘greens’, to have planes in the air without the volcano.

So again, the question remains; is the Icelandic volcano(s) liable for murder, "ecocide" and can be sued for the economic cost of delayed flights?

One more impossibility

The median price paid for a California home in March jumped 14.3% compared with the same month last year. The San Francisco Bay Area sees a 31% median-price gain.
The median was up 9.7% to $329,000 in Los Angeles County and up 12.2% to $432,000 in Orange County.

Isn’t this nice? Unemployment in California is officially 12% (real number over 20%) and the state is close to defaulting. Think Greece.

And with this in mind home prices jumps that much? This isn’t possible folks. So what happened?

About 40.5% of the previously owned homes sold in March were foreclosures… Oh, how interesting. And as we all know, banks are buying housing from themselves in order to keep prices up. This cannot explain the whole increase; neither can inflation that is starting to gain momentum.

This cannot either, but it is fun to watch:

was just smoking some goooooood shit

Number one industry eh?

What trickery is this?

Sorry I’ve been absent of late. Been reading up on history, checking the financial numbers and trying to figure out what is actually going on. Also been planning for yet another move - to my sixth country in as many years, hopefully more permanent this time. Not really the desolate island with bananas I was looking for, but a step in the right direction.

Anyway, I cannot really pin-point each and every scam out there, but the math doesn’t lie and so something isn’t right in the state of the world.

As I have said before on many occasions the markets crashed last year, just as I predicted many years ago, but I thought they would only be able to cover it up until about now and then it would be all downhill. The first time I said the real crash would happen during the spring of 2010 I think was back in 2000, and I’ve kept to it ever since.

Granted, when looking at this outcome several years ago, I didn’t know what schemes they would pull out of their hats, so this unprecedented spending-spree and very hot-going printing presses didn’t really occur to me. Well, they did, but not at this level.

But even factoring in such nightmarish schemes, it shouldn’t matter; in fact it should only make things much worse and increase the depression into the giant Tsunami that it also have become. So how are they covering this up and for how long can it last? And even more importantly; why are the numbers all wrong and who is behind all the lying and deceit?

You see the math tells us that things have never been this bad. Never.

The correlation of trade surpluses and trade deficits between countries doesn’t match up. Strange sudden spikes on markets that should be going down. Gold that doesn’t exist is getting sold in massive amounts to secret buyers. Weird consumer loan blips. Banks are buying housing from themselves to keep prices up. Governments are buying treasuries from each other (even more so from themselves) in order to cover up that the debt market is overcrowded. Inflation (the real one) is eating into people’s purchasing power but somehow the borrowing and spending continues.

With so many countries not only owing 100% or more of GDP in debt, but also have long-term debt-obligations and pensions that is on levels in ratio to GDP on 3-400% or more (UK is close to 400% in total debt, excluded private and business debt). Stock markets are highly overvalued but are still continuing upwards.

I could go on for a long time, but to summarize, things have never looked worse than they do right now. The fundamentals are horrific; our producing power is continuing down, the debt mountain is going for the moon. It should be crashing and burning right now. But it isn’t. And since the math and the fundamentals don’t lie, something else is going on here.

There are only two things that can explain deviating numbers and why the world continues onwards.

Firstly governments are in cahoots. They are working together in order to cover up how bad it really is. They do this by buying treasuries from each other, or have their banking pals do it for them. They manipulate trade- and market numbers which they only can do if they do work together. They can keep the market optimistic by using spin-doctors and the faulty numbers they’ve fabricated and by appealing to the feeble minds of the general public. They also use minor crisis’s, like Greece or Iceland, to hide the real problems. While we’re focusing on the, in these circumstances, small problems they are sweeping away whistling jaunty tunes and telling us that there’s nothing to see here. And you don’t need to be a conspiracist to figure out that they use terrorists and wars for the same reason.

Secondly there’s something in the works here that no-one knows about. Call it an alien conspiracy, Illuminati trickery or reptilian cover-ups if you will, but there is probably a more mundane explanation to it. Lately the money flow towards IMF, the lying statistics and the strangeness of sudden spikes point to something big.

Have Japan already crashed? Is Spain being hold up by manipulators? Is the UK real-estate market totally bogus and about to fall apart? Or are they getting together and handing money over to China so the Chinese can buy up everything in sight and “help” the world economy? I don’t know, but there’s something going on.

In the meanwhile the debts continue to be accumulated, the regulatory fascism comes to internet increases each day, and governments are seemingly looking towards Kim Jong Ill for inspiration.

This we do know; the next crash is just around the corner and this time around there’s nothing they can do about it. There’s no more inflating of the bubbles, no more borrowing and the printing press will only create hyperinflation. I am sure they will try it all again with negative interest rates money-piles everywhere and more fictitious borrowing. However, it won’t work. There’s no power left in that sort of Keynesianism.

In Sweden it is clear that neither the government nor the opposition have any clue what is going on. Right now about 150 billion is needed to be saved in the government’s budget, interest rates should be forced up to 7-8% and every state owned business should be sold when there’s still time for it. I do hope, whomever you intend to vote for, that you hold these elected criminals responsible for not doing the right thing. You’ll soon understand why…

They have walked us all off a cliff and handed us an anvil. But before this cartoony end is upon us they will find some scape-goats to blame, more distractions for you to keep an eye on and some new schemes worthy of Stephen King to keep them in power.

If I had to guess, this is the reason why we’re not in a full out depression right now, they are consolidating power and coming up with new trickery before we find out what they have done.

I’ll let you know when I have figured this out. Until then I urge you all to get stocked up and get armed. This is going to be ugly.

Now… we’re did I put that toothbrush?

Cockroaches

Humans of earth! Bow down tooooo meee…

The cockroach is a formidable animal. They are known for being able to survive on limited resources like the glue from the back of postage stamps. Some can go without air for 45 minutes.

Is has been suggested that these creatures will "inherit the earth" if we humans were to blow ourselves up. However, what such scientists refuse to recognize is that they already have.

Let’s look at the facts.

They feed on human acquired food and can leave an offensive odor. Check.

They can also passively transport microbes on their body surfaces including those that are potentially dangerous to humans, particularly in environments such as hospitals. Check.

Because of their long, persistent association with humans, cockroaches are frequently referred to in art, literature, folk tales and theater and film. In Western culture, cockroaches are often depicted as vile and dirty pests. Their size, long antennae, shiny appearance and spiny legs make them disgusting. I know of several just like this so; check.

Although some features aren’t compatible, I see no reason why not to think that many of these things are walking among us, posing as humans, but in reality plotting our demise with mad schemes such as ‘public healthcare’, ‘religiosity’ and ‘wars’.

The ones I am talking about are of course politicians.

Have you read Franz Kafka's The Metamorphosis? In it a man is transformed overnight into a cockroach-like creature. He views himself as repulsive in his new identity and I can certainly relate.

When I entered politics many years ago I did so with a pretty dim-witted naive look at things. Of course I knew already back then that the world was messed up and that politicians in general were evil incarnate, but I had no idea how bad things really were. Worse still is what politics does to you as a human being.

You see politics is partly about what the elitists call “compromise” which in reality is another word for finding the right coalition by bribing, threatening and in other ways convince others of your idea and then make them vote to support you.

Partly it is about doing almost the opposite i.e. thrash-talk or stab those you don’t like who are in the way. Sometimes the stabbing part is literal, but mostly it’s about finding some negative thing about their past, character or views you can exploit to your advantage.

When acting out these characteristics of politics step by step your soul gets sucked out and if it goes on long enough sooner or later that person looking back at you from the mirror is a stranger - a vile beast that will sell his mother for a couple of additional votes.

Someone might argue that this is sort of common practice in all jobs and that ‘politics’ is the same no matter what you do. This is wrong.

Ever seen a really hardcore soap opera like Falcon Crest or Melrose Place? Intrigues everywhere, everyone is sleeping with everyone, there are murders, frame-jobs etc. etc. That’s nothing. Take one of those shows, the worse one you can think of and multiply it with thousand and maybe, perhaps, take out the murders and that’s politics.

What do you think such an environment does to a person?

I would even go so far as to say that sociopathic thinking, anti-human behavior and inferiority complex are the cornerstones of any ‘good’ politician. The higher up in the food chain you get, the more your lifeblood drains away and the more that despicable cockroach takes over. To be a famous and very high-profile politician means, per automatic, that you’re one of the most evil people around.

Maybe I am a bit too condescending towards cockroaches; you can actually find good things to say about them if you look hard enough…

The sad part is that I actually where a very good politician… However I almost never compromised about my beliefs, even voting against my own party on several occasions. This, as anyone ever been in politics knows, is the cardinal sin - the worst atrocity possible is to not follow the stream, and especially horrific it is when it comes to elitists benefits. I got a whole government body to say no to a lavish excursion and several days of feasting at a castle one time, oh the looks I got from my own party members would have made Medusa proud.

Needless to say the bullying was massive for many years, but had nothing to do with me eventually leaving. I just got fed up with ignorant enemies of reality thinking they are someone just because other idiots have elected them.

And you cannot really do anything or accomplish a single thing without walking down the soul-sucking lane. You need to be despicable and be able to do whatever it takes in order to change that which is despicable. I didn’t want to be that person or take that many years out of my life for the goal of maybe change things a little.

Ever wondered why so many youngsters leave political parties and politics in general and instead focuses on single issue like the environment, animals or freedom of speech? This is why.

I think it was on the TV-show ‘Bones’ one of the scientists said that if there are aliens out there, they are far more likely to have cockroach-like qualities than be similar to us. That is probably true, but if you want to go and look for such qualities in a humanoid look no further than to your local government.

Taken from above, this might be one of the best descriptions of a politician ever written:

They can also passively transport microbes on their body surfaces including those that are potentially dangerous to humans, particularly in environments such as hospitals.

What truly makes a woman equal

Wanna rape me?

Organized rape is a tactic used to denigrate and repress political prisoners and victims of war and it is often under reported due to the stigma attached to being a victim of this crime in many parts of the world. Rather than existing as a side effect of war, in countries such as Darfur, Pakistan, Peru, Serbia and Rwanda mass rape has been systematically used as a tool for ethnic cleansing, to spread HIV, extract information and to terrorize rival tribes, movements and dissidents.

This isn’t something new, history is filled with slaves from wars and females being raped or submitted to unspeakable horrors at the hands of conquers or, as is also a persistent factor, by their own men.

One thing has actually changed this...

Not that rape will ever stop existing, there will always be rapists - female and male rapists. Always has and always will. Nothing will change that. However the main reason why women are more susceptible to rape is a physical disadvantage.

I know there are a lot of feminists out there claiming it’s a man’s world and so women are automatically prey. To a certain degree I need to agree with that basic assumption, but that actually goes for all humans, of both sexes. Actually men are much more likely to be beaten up, murdered, killed or be subjected to a crime than women.

But talking about rape it is much more common that the offender is male and the victim is female. And as said at the start, often this is used as a ‘tactic’ in wars and ethnic cleansings.

Since a couple of hundreds of years back, and certainly today, one thing has change the disadvantage women has against men. A tiny female can do nothing against a pair of big hairy thugs, right? Wrong!

Self-defense classes? Please. If you’re a woman you need a black belt to fight of one attacking man if he’s a lot bigger and stronger then you. Sure a lucky punch in the right place or dislocating the knee with a kick will do it, and it happens that even the tiniest of creatures can fend themselves against a much bigger attacker, but is that really the kind of odds you like to play? And what if there are two of them? What if there’s seven of them? No black belt or training in the world will help you then, no matter what the movies tell you.

Having training and by avoiding being alone, drunk, and stumbling around in high-heals in a dark alley at 4am will go a long way. That would make you more confident, and maybe, just maybe put you on pretty equal terms with one attacker.

I know of a couple of women that has never even been faced with unwanted sexual advances. Such females are actually, and sadly, not so easy to find. Most women do get attacked, taken advantage off or ends up in an unfortunate situation one time or the other. What is clearly the common traits for those women I do know that has avoided such things are self-confidence, self-reliance and a clear aura of “don’t try anything buster or I will bite your dick off” –attitude. Also, it should be pointed out, none of them are feminists.

However, attitude, some training and not jumping into the van because someone offers you candy isn’t always enough. And it certainly isn’t when there’s a war going on.

There is however one thing that makes all humans equal, something that will make a single petite woman much stronger than any two hairy thugs.

A gun.

I promise you all, if every woman on this planet had a gun or was allowed to carry a gun the number of rapes would go down dramatically. Even the potentiality is enough to scare of most attackers, which means that not all women need to actually have a gun. So if you’re scared of them or don’t want to own one, fine, but as long as some do and it’s legal any would-be rapists need to think very hard before doing something.

But wouldn’t this lead to some shootings and dead folk? Well yes it would, yet another reason why rapes would go down in numbers. Rapists are often multiple offenders, shoot one dead and its very likely future victims will be saved.

And this argument holds true all throughout. The people of Ethiopia or Haiti don’t need money, they’ve got aid coming out of their ears, never helped before, and it won’t help now. But give all the normal people a gun each and watch the status que change overnight. I am not saying guns would save the starving, no, of course not, but it will make their oppressive leftie governments to think twice before raping, pillaging or taxing them and that in the long run will help.

This isn’t a universal solution. I know this is an easy argument to make and it won’t solve all problems, not by far, but it will save lots of women (and men).

And, as said, a gun makes us equal, strangely then that those women-rights activists aren’t proposing and advocating gun rights. That has an explanation too, you see most such groups are formed by socialist ideas and the thing a socialist fears more than anything is if the people are armed. It is much better to have lots of raped women than a populace confident enough and armed enough to actually say no to government.

You are going to die! Part XXXIV

I always get so pissed when watching TV-shows and movies when someone dies and immediately they have some epiphany or religious experience walking around on clouds, meeting some dead relative or seeing their waiting 72 virgins licking each other (okay, that’s my fantasy…).

Yesterday I watched some old episode of Grays Anatomy were one of the lead actresses died. Of course she woke up seeing whatever, experience some other and pffff… There I was, actually feeling tears nearing my eye, and then she dies and… wakes up… seeing whatnot with whoknowswhat in some happy fluffy thingy. So stupid. I changed the channel…

Remember ‘Lilja 4-ever’? A fantastic movie about the sex trade between the former Soviet Union and Western Europe. Really great, and you have tears in your eyes all the way through, but in the end that underage girl (the main character) needs to run around on rooftops with wings. WINGS! WTF!?!? Completely destroying a fantastic movie with a couple of minutes of idiocy.

Another thing that is highly stupid on the same theme is when a lead character dies and sort of ‘come back’ i.e. walks around the survivors “talking to them” as in they are remembering that person. Probably meant to be a smooth going away goodbye of that character, but only makes it ridiculous.

Like in NCIS when Agent Caitlin "Kate" Todd in one of the most shocking moments in TV history, gets shoot in the head and dies. For TWO whole episodes her ‘ghost’ is hunting the other main characters. What could have been absolutely TV-magic suddenly turns into disaster because some softy director or useless producer likes to show a religious endgame.

And it’s almost always in American movies and shows this happens. Probably because so many idiots in that country embrace creationism, but regardless, it’s stupid.

Not to say other countries or cultures are any different. Remember ‘The Seventh Seal’ by my now deceased countryman Ingmar Bergman? But at least in many of those examples death or any afterlife is sort of part of the story. If the tale is about religion, Jesus or death I sort of get it, it’s part of the story. That’s not what I am talking about.

What I mean is when some hard-line character in a detective movie or action plot filled with alien headhunters from Venus and the movie/show incorporate lots of nudity, violence and rock-and-roll and suddenly someone dies and… goes to God..?

It just doesn’t seem right.

Washington Mutual

The failed bank Washington Mutual made subprime loans it knew were likely to go bad and then packaged them into risky securities, investigators say.

Is that manure I smell my dear Watson?

Before Washington Mutual collapsed in the largest bank failure in U.S. history, its executives knowingly created a "mortgage time bomb" by making subprime loans they knew were likely to go bad and then packaging them into risky securities, a congressional investigation has found.

Nooooo… really?

A new consumer financial protection agency, has been proposed by Obama has proposed as part of his regulatory overhaul, to stop lenders from preying on borrowers.

Well, they are going to keep Franny and Freddie and who many out there thinks that the administration that is literarily overrun by Goldman Sachs people will ever check out the tentacles of that bank?

And the main problems with insanely low interest rates, maniac printing of new notes and extra government cash thrown at new buyers of housing are still there, still increasing the debt bubble, still building on that financial disaster.

The truth is that Washington Mutual isn’t the first or by any means the last bank going out of business here. Everyone of them, EVERY SINGLE ONE, have after bankruptcy shown a 30-40 and even 50% in overvalue thanks to the scams. We’re counting 150 banks so far. If there’s no exception for this among the so far failures, raise your hand if you think the rest are really solvent…

We’re talking trillions, many trillions of dollars and the federal government has either already bought them through Franny and Freddie or promised tax dollars to cover the losses. You think last year was bad? Wait ‘till you see what this brings…