Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Murderer Teddy about to be replaced

Ever since the arch criminal and murderer Senator Teddy Kennedy died (at last) his old seat has been up for grabs. The two main candidates, Scott Brown (r) and Martha Coakley (dem), are pretty much even in the polls with the only real candidate Joseph L. Kennedy, a Libertarian running as an independent, trailing behind.

Joseph L. Kennedy with no relationship with the dead killer said he's been bombarded with e-mails from Brown supporters urging him to drop out and endorse the Republican. Kennedy said he's staying in, as he should. Without Kennedy, Brown would most likely win, but on the other hand, with large turnouts for Kennedy he can send a message across the US which in the long run is worth much more than a stooge that will likely be voting for every other piece of offensive and unconstitutional legislation that passes his way.

Around this little debacle we can hear the chants:

"SCOTT BROWN FOR SENATE MAN!(crushes can over head, does a few pushups) HE'S GONNA KILL THAT BILL, YOU JUST WATCH HIM! YEAH! GO ISRAEL!"

“MARTHA! MARTHA! MARTHA!” - only word they know...

And

”Freedom, justice and cutting government!”

It doesn’t matter who among the two elitist candidates that wins. Of course the Obamination will have a harder time passing his fascist crap through the senate if Brown wins, but either way the idiots of Taxachussetts will have elected another spineless tax feeder who you wouldn't want to run your store into national legislative office.

It seems that Brown will win because people want everything to slow down (this is sensible) but they all just voted for Obama 14 months ago because they were so upset with Bush, and now Republicans are the answer to everything.

This back-and-forth between the two abusive parents is a side-show. Any other candidate besides Kennedy is the exact same candidate.

When are the American people going to figure out that the puppet masters stay the same and that the two party system is a scam?

2 comments:

  1. Pretty interesting news, how come we can´t read anything near it in Svenska Dagbladet?

    ReplyDelete
  2. They don't have journalists employed and only translates some news blip sent from one of their cooperation-people.

    If you want news, the old media is useless

    ReplyDelete