More terrorist alarms please

Let me start by asking you to put yourself in terrorist shoes. You are now a terrorist (not really a stretch if you smoke, use internet, weigh too much or happen to be Muslim). So now try and think like a terrorist. You are out to scare people, hurt people and make them react to you and your policies. It is not about convincing anyone or gaining support, it’s about you killing and maiming for a cause and you want to stir up as much feelings as possible.

Okay?

Here’s the scenario; several countries issue an alarm that you may attack. People are told to stay away from crowded areas, people shouldn’t fly to Europe, and everyone are told that individuals with breast implants, turbans and beards are shady types that are very likely to “do something”. Also you can be pretty certain that each country’s´ security forces, police, park rangers and meter maids are extra careful and may stop playing hearts for a moment to actually do some work. Boats, trains, aircrafts and trucks are randomly searched while hospitals are stocking up blood and preparing for potential victims.

So from a terrorist perspective half the work is already done. People are extra scared, papers are filled with speculation and horrors stories, billions extra is spent on heighten security, and entire societies becomes suspicious against anything out of the norm. Women leaving the shower with a towel rapped around their head take one look in the mirror and starts screaming that a radical Muslim is starring back.

With all this going on why would you actually attack? Can you think of a single reason?

The only reason I can think of is that you could prove that any security measure is useless, that the police are powerless to stop any thought-out attack and in doing the terrorist thing it could, maybe, increase the uncertainty and feeling of fear.

However that would be a bit of a gamble.

Firstly with tighter checks and less donughts eating the police and military are slightly more inclined to actually catch you. Only a couple of percentage more, but still a slight increase in risk from your perspective.

Secondly with all the hype people are already scared to a point almost at the same level as if you had already blown up that school you had your eyes on. On a 10 grade scale, with 10 being your targeted scariness, so many people are already at 7 or 8, not at 5 as they normally are. It’s a less of jump from 7 or 8 then from 5 up to 10 (yes it is, use a calculator if you don’t believe me) hence any explosion would mean a less of a jump in scariness hence less of a shock. And shocking societies and people is really one of your main goals.

Thirdly, one of your other main goals – to put a wedge between people and create animosity – is also already reached. Muslims, radical lefties and radical righties, hillbillies, neighbors, people with two mailboxes, chemistry teachers, youngsters buying knives, grandmas reading about Hitler online, and carnival workers are already being watched and monitored. Religious and cultural differences are discussed on the news, and there’s an upswing in people voting for populist political parties.

So why would you attack?

Isn’t it better to wait for the frightened people to calm down a bit, wait for the police to go back to doing nothing, and wait for the moment when targeted societies least expect it?

Why decrease the chance of success during a moment in time when the effect of what you do is less of a jump on the shocking-meter?

Ever wondered why that 2m tall Osama that supposedly lives in small caves with a broken liver hardly have done a single thing since 9/11? (Assuming of course that he had anything with to do with that in the first place – which has never been officially proven) Do you really think our security forces are that good at what they do that they have managed to stop terrorism that sufficiently? If you think so, why haven’t they caught a guy who is reasonably easy to spot no matter where he goes?

So after this little mind game did you reach the same conclusion as I did?

With no statistics to back my claim up and with nothing else than being able to think like a terrorist (which probably, again, puts me on any number of radars) I am utterly convinced that if you want to travel, visit the Eiffel Tower or use the subway you should do so, with less of a risk from terrorists, during one of these heighten security alerts. The more governments warn, the more you should do the opposite. This, coincidently, is good advice about everything government does.

I am not saying that terrorists won’t attack, only that I find it highly unlikely.

With that said you should also realize that even the cave dwelling Bin Laden need to stick his head out sometime. Sending videotapes to media may be scary for a while, but sooner or later he and his cronies also need to do something. And there are a lot of crazies out there; your own government is proof of that. So of course more terrorism is expected somewhere, somehow.

For me the few people dying each year from various attacks don’t merit terrorism to even reach my top twenty list. Far more dies from congenital diseases, malnutrition, wars, and so forth. Most of us actually live in the worst place you can think of. A place that is one of the main mutilators and killer of man – our own homes. And the main murderer of mankind, our real nemesis, the thing that is more likely to kill you than any disease or accident, is the very entity we rely on for protection from terrorists. And THAT is hilariously funny.

So no, I don’t travel less by buss and I don’t avoid crowded areas when government tells me to, on the contrary, I seek them out. The more newspapers tell me how unsafe I am, the safer I feel.

Sadly with all you morons out there frighten, government will take the opportunity to hand out two complementary notes. On one it say’s “give me your money and I’ll protect you”, on the other it say’s “give away your freedom or you’ll die”. These two notes are used to impose restrictions, controls, surveillance, taxation and, in the end, a totalitarian society.

Those ‘notes’ should scare you more than all terrorists put together.

A terrorist from Sweden and other tales

Never mind the Vikings that for all intents and purposes should, to a certain degree, be regarded as terrorists.

But if we move forward in time to the break-up of the Kalmar Union (1397-1523) that had united the Nordic countries but was gradually opposed by Swedish terrorists taking action against the Danish monarchy, and finally broken off by the terrorist would-be king Gustav Vasa. A king that at the same time broke with the Roman Catholic Church and established the Reformation. A heretic and terrorist created modern Sweden. How about that one?

Personally I think this was a mistake. A unified Norway (and Iceland), Denmark, Sweden and Finland with all its might would have been a very powerful entity in Europe and the world. And take away the animosity that historically speaking has been very fierce between Danes and Swedes, and the countries (country) would have been much stronger not fighting each other and instead been able to focus armies and diplomacy elsewhere. I am very convinced that if a successful merger had taken place history and the European landscape would look very different. Frankly hardly anyone in the world would have been able to compete, at least not in the 15th and 16th century.

But I digress, so let’s get back to the terrorist father of Sweden.

Gustav Vasa was a great monarch. Probably the best and brightest in Swedish history, and his policies and laws were at the forefront laying the groundwork for a future grandiose country and transforming a very poor underdeveloped nation into a European Powerhouse.

However he did start out as a terrorist. A murderess scoundrel that killed thousands of people in rebellions and wars and assassinated Danish officers and broke out from a lawful and hundred years plus old entity. And he had no problem with turning against old allies slaughtering anyone that opposed him.

After his father got executed together with other terrorists for rebelling against the lawful sovereign, Gustav got himself involved in several revolts until he managed to rally an army in the province of Dalarna and gaining troops from Leipzig he then, after some years, repelled the legal king of Denmark and eventually, through wars and shrewd practices, became king of the nation of Sweden.

For most historians today (except maybe Danish ones) he is regarded as a liberator of sort, a freedom fighter. However he should rather be regarded as a terrorist and instigator of rebellions. By today’s standards he would probably be sitting in a secret CIA terrorist jail, alongside the USA’s founding fathers, getting tortured. Any contemporary politician and the politically correct would today have regarded him as a horrible nutcase, a fascist, and a terrorist. Isn’t it fun how things change?

This little excursion into the past isn’t the only example of how some individuals or groups in one passage of time can be labeled in one way, and gain recognition in a completely other way if times change.

History is written by the victorious.

But this isn’t really the point I am trying to make. Many others have made this observation before, probably a lot better then I just did. What I am trying to get at is that it’s not necessarily a bad thing doing the dance of revolution.

Those in power will never relinquish it without name-calling and certain elements both in-house and abroad will make an effort to curve any “terrorist” from gaining power and try stop such individuals/groups from having any say in matters of the state.

It’s not really about you (or Gustav) being or not being a terrorist, that’s secondary. You see those in power doesn’t care about your policies, your politics or who’s right and wrong, such archaic descriptions have nothing to do with it. The reason that they fear so called terrorists is that they oppose those in power. Nothing less, nothing more. Even religion or cultural differences are secondary.

Those sitting on power want to keep it, preferably expand and strengthen it. Those sitting on power are always the righteous legal leaders that you should obey. Anyone opposing those sitting on power are terrorists, extremists, anarchists or crazies. This has actually never changed.

Remember a fellow named Jesus? He too could be regarded as an instigator and since so many Jews at the time actually were terrorists against their Roman rulers, it’s not that hard to understand why Imperial Rome feared that Jesus had the charisma to lead a guerrilla uprising against them. Today we would probably have sided with Rome, at least most of you out there would. And with words thrown at you from an effective propaganda machine many of you would probably have cheered Rome on as it killed this terrorist Jew.

I am not religious and I’m frankly not convinced that the historical figure Jesus even existed, but what we do know is that many Jews (and people from other religions and cultures) were slaughtered for being what we today would label ‘terrorists’. And the Romans were in no means alone. Pretty much every leadership and country in the history of mankind have executed, tortured, or expelled potentially dangerous individuals. Sometimes with good reason, but mostly on a whim or in order to keep their power.

This hasn’t changed. The same thing goes on today.

Granted many democratic (and mainly western) countries do have an actual reason to argue their case. There are many communists, anarchists, fascists and religious fanatics out there that don’t want any form of freedom or democracy and have no problem murdering millions to get their way. And I cannot really sidestep deeply religious and nutty Muslims either; no matter how “racist” it makes me. So maybe there’s a slim difference here, but the real reason for those in charge to chase down and oppose terrorism hasn’t changed. It’s still about power.

You see they aren’t only chasing down fanatics or extremists - pretty much anyone that gets in the crosshair of the righteous elite is a target.

They start out small. People who like drugs, smokers, and fat people have been targeted almost with the same ferocity as real terrorists. And don’t even get me started on Internet users. In America people that believe in the constitution is today “potential terrorists”. And in pretty much every western country anyone wearing a turban or burqa is a potential suicide bomber.

Read that word again; “Potential”.

As said, they start out small. With suspicions.

Soon, very soon, they will go to the next step. Following in the footsteps of rulers before anyone that is not conformed, listens to ‘reason’ and those that have a deep seated suspicious view towards government will be targeted. Some say this has already happened.

And when you think about it, are you really safe?

Would your government take a view opposing yours and silence you, and those who would speak for you, and refuse to countenance any debate at all that would let you have a say? Would your government use lies and deceit to override anything you might want to do or say? Would your government use the law against you, demonise and punish you, encourage others to treat you as subhuman, for no other reason than they just don't like you?

Of course they would, and do.

The fact is that most of us live in societies were every single one is regarded guilty until proven innocent.

Ordinary folks, you and me, your neighbor and everyone you know are already treated as criminals. Not only in regards to internet or smoking. We have already seen and heard horror stories on how innocent people are locked up, flown to distant lands getting tortured for no other reason than that they can, maybe, possibly, know a bit about someone or something.

Spanish Inquisition… anyone? Leg-Iron has a magnificent piece on the subject. Go read.

This will escalate, and the good thing about it is that real “terrorists” will emerge as a consequence of these policies. I am not talking about religious fanatics living in caves or right-wing trailer park attendees; I am talking about ordinary citizens that simply have had enough.

As usual those in power will bunch all that oppose them together. Guilty by association. And Guilty because the government says so.

It’s all about power. Nothing more, nothing less.

Eugenics

I am not really a fan of the Georgia GuideStones theorem that pops up now and again in tin-foil hat circles. However no matter what one believes in that regard it is hard not to wonder what the end game really is when it comes to policies like the Manmade Global Warming swindle.

There are tons of very smart people coming up with schemes how to sell this idea that, as far as I can tell, has no basis whatsoever in reality, to the general populace. Some of these scientists, researchers and bureaucrats must know that what they are selling is bogus. Maybe even a majority of them. So why do it?

The reason is, in all likelihood, Power.

There are many ways of gaining, maintaining and expanding power. The most commonly used selling point throughout history has been the usage of FEAR. If people are afraid of something it is much easier to sell a bigger, better, stronger and more intrusive government. And with bigger, better, stronger and more intrusive government comes power for those that either sits in government or for them that knows best how to take advantage of government.

If FEAR is combined with a clearly defined antagonist that is sold as the real instigator of said fear and if the alternative is marketed with pink shimmering skies, pretty much everyone will listen and almost all of those will conform and become controllable little sheople.

Today we can see this trickery when it comes to internet where, apparently, every no-good horrible Muslimterroristpedophile is openly chatting up our daughters while spreading hatred and communicating on what train station to blow up.

Terrorist do exist, Muslims too, and pedophiles that according to the grapevine started to exist at the same time as computers and webcams, is a reality. And the fact of the matter is that internet can be used for evil purposes. Just as a fork can be used to kill so can internet be used to plan the killing. You can find out what fork is best for the crime, probably even get hints and tips from other would-be fork-murderers. So when it comes to internet they do make a slim, petite, very minuscule point.

Manmade Global Warming however have no such defined adversary, except, of course, mankind.

We know that The Sun (not the paper) is responsible for almost all weather on our planet. That single percentage or two that hasn’t to do with the Sun can be related to cosmic rays, our magnetic poles or the oceans. There are also other minor factors like the occasional asteroid, volcanoes and such. But for some reason mankind have such an imperative role in the environment that the end for the entire planet is near. Driving cars, factories, hairspray, refrigerators and our pets have for some unknown reason started a chain reaction that will end all life.

Already when reading such claims any thinking adult should start being very skeptical towards the Church of Climatology and its followers.

But it doesn’t stop with ill-defined and very vague claims; they also use pure fiction and outright lies to sell us this story.

For example the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have been caught fiddling numbers, hiding facts, bullying opponents and outright lying in the name of science. Anyone reading the Climategate emails or checking what these tricksters use as “scientific material” (the ‘material’ that’s not SECRET that is) need to stand in awe.

Among other things we now know that one single tree in Siberia is responsible for the famous hockey-stick graph. We know that only data supporting their pre-determined view is used, all the rest of the data is ignored or hidden away. We know that they actively persecute and thrash anyone arguing against them. We know that both earlier and later proven faulty data is used and they do so intentionally.

This is facts. This we know.

And when they have an “independent review” of this scam, what happens?

Well when the UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon asked the world's science academies to review the work of IPCC. He did this by stating:

"Let me be clear - the threat posed by climate change is real"

And if that clear message wasn’t enough he continued:

"I have seen no credible evidence that challenges the main conclusions of [the IPCC's 2007] report."

And with this mission statement the InterAcademy Council (IAC) reviewed IPCC.

Oh, but wait. If the mission of IAC wasn’t clear enough, wait ‘till you know how “independent” they are. This is like sending out wolfs to investigate why the fox got into the henhouse. Well, in all fairness to wolfs, they probably would be more independent.

Taking a wee look at the IAC do you know who their partner organizations are? You guessed it; over half that can be seen on their webpage are UN programs. The rest is the World Bank and other international academy groups. And if that isn’t enough how about the fact that the same people that appoint the IPCC folks are the very same people that appoints the IAC folks.

And their website is filled with things about climate change. These are hardliner Climate Church goers. They pray at the altar of the Polar Bear God and they are to check their pals at UN?

These are sort of facts and knowledge one should have before watching these flicks I have brought for you to see. Even if you don’t buy the Eugenics angle (I don’t) you cannot ignore that the end result, the end game, may very well be the exact same thing implied in these clips and argued by conspiracists.

Happy viewing







Fun isn't it?

Random coincidences

Nothing to see here folks, only a random event. Move along.

There are a lot of things that can happen that surely have no planning behind them and are definitely totally random and circumstantial. That bad news in regards to finance and markets almost always is mentioned on Fridays happens by chance. That bad news in regards to finance and markets that for some reason isn’t conveyed on Fridays always is followed by two or three ‘good news’ hours afterwards with an immediate bump upwards on the stock exchange that otherwise would be going down is pure coincident.

That the Swedish Security Service (Säpo) has raised the terror alert in Sweden to "elevated" due to an increased threat level just weeks before the government budget proposal is put to the vote is just a fluke.

That FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III told a congressional hearing that a spike in recent terrorism cases is direct evidence of the evolving threat just as the Tea Party is gaining momentum and people are starting to silently prepare for tomorrows financial collapse have no association to each other whatsoever.

That the Church of Climatology produce and spread a video depicting children getting blown up for not confirming to the Green God’s decrees - but then, suddenly, withdraw the film issuing apologies while the horrendous flick keep spreading is only an accident. No-one that watched the film will have a slight remembrance of it, somewhere deep down, when the state impose their next set of fascist laws meant to “save the planet”. Nope. Not one.

That the International Council of Shopping Centers has come out with a prediction that U.S. retailers’ sales will climb 3 percent to 3.5 percent this holiday season only a few months before Thanksgiving and x-mas is surely unplanned. That trucking in the US is in full collapse, the dollar is plunging and that the current calendar year has a deficit "run rate" of $1.667 trillion, essentially identical to last year, means nothing to these folks. Souring debt-mountains, US unemployment over 20% and a global who-can-devalue-their-currency-the-most competition is secondary. So it’s surely a coincident that shopping center owners and retailers predict an upswing.

That Sweden's last remaining copper coin, The 50 öre coin, took its final breath recently and is only remembered in a historical context with pundits giving funny anecdotes while hardly anyone mentions that this a inflationary fiasco and a real bloody sign how we are getting screwed by our masters, is only a stroke of bad luck. Don’t you think?

Other reoccurring examples of totally unrelated events:

Laws, hinders, terrorist chases and taxation in regards to internet are in exponential increase while the economic fundaments are crashing before our eyes.

Increase in anti-immigration discussions and more blaming of Romani’s, Jews, and Muslims while the economic fundaments are crashing before our eyes.

More and more stories about greedy businessmen and capitalism’s “failures” on the news while the economic fundaments are crashing before our eyes.

That we daily are reminded on how Oduma, Gorgon Brownie and other soul sucking entities “saved us” from a depression while the economic fundaments are crashing before our eyes.

I could go on about such random unrelated events, but maybe the funniest, and probably most coincidental thing ever, is that people out in the world seem to really believe in such a chaos filled world were nothing is related to anything else.

I have mentioned it before, but it is necessary to repeat – you are all idiots.

This little movie has nothing to do with the text above.

Something is bound to happen. Soon.

For those of us staying tuned to the online chatter and reading blogs and keeping up to date with the alternative press, there’s a build-up going on. I have seen this happening over the last couple of years and it is starting to reach a boiling point.

There are so many angry people out there. So many disillusioned citizens have lost their jobs while rich banksters, oligarchs and the political elite gorge themselves on a buffet of tax money.

Lately even normally laid back and conservative people have started to talk about stringing politicians up, talking about rebellions and that it is time for people to arm themselves. And these folks are not tin-foil hats, they are not radical lefties or anarchist right-wingers, they are ordinary citizens that have had enough.

An entire generation of youngsters and free thinkers that had a bastion of hope, a respirator and outlet for information and democracy – is now getting it taken away from them. I am of course taking about internet. Nothing has scarred the powers that be more, ever, in our entire history, as internet has. Suddenly nothing could be controlled and even the soccer mum next door could be an informant or journalist. The carefully built elitist structure that couldn’t be rocked by anything was/is in swing because of internet. As a consequence they will do and say ANYTHING to keep it from running free. The mock trial against PirateBay, the outburst of autocracy from political bodies, the European Union imposing Stasi-like control-grids and the US transforming into a fascist stupidity is only the beginning. They will STOP AT NOTHING in order to control, and survey and tax internet.

Think about all this for a moment and then consider whether I am right about us just being in the beginning of this financial and political dilemma. If true, where does that leave us?

And they know this. Of course. The elitists have sniffed this out and are already starting the “blame-game”. You know it was the rich that did it. And the Muslims. Jews too. The Romani’s are taking our jobs. Immigrants in general are also at fault. Greed got us here. The evil Mr. Market is out to get us.

…

Another thing that seems to be more and more obvious are reoccurring market manipulations. Previously our puppet masters and rich cabalas have worked in the shadows and could only affect some part of the market and this only temporarily. However with more and more regulations their power has increased. Even more important are the so called “stimulus” packages which in reality only is money printing going into the extreme. This has freed trillions of ‘extra cash’ that can be used to trick markets and pundits alike into gigantic scams. The Market Ticker seems to have this down…

Somewhere down the line this stops ‘working’ and there can be a several reasons for this. The most unlikely scenario is that they stop printing money and raise interest rates across the board.

Here Keynesians actually have it right. If we did the right thing now, markets would crash and burn. If interest rates went up to 5-6-7 percent (probably a lot higher in several countries) and they started to roll back money instead of throwing them out there, and if they at the same time cut government spending down to manageable levels - if this happened we would immediately enter a depression.

Wouldn’t this be bad? Sure. Horrific really. But it is the right thing to do, let the market correct itself, let people get back to rebuilding the economy and after two three years we would start to recover and after another year we would be back on track.

This will never happen though. Politicians are scared senseless at the moment. People are already rioting and issuing general strikes, and threats towards the ruling elite are reaching pre-revolution levels. Imagine if they did the right thing and things went from really bad to truly horrific. Would they be re-elected? Not a chance. More likely they’d find themselves dangling from lampposts.

So in the eyes of our sovereign leaders this option is off the table.

Instead they will do the wrong thing. Which is to say the exact same thing they did to get us into this mess and the exact same thing they have done to worsen the situation time and again. They will print more money, they will offer more government solutions, and they will borrow and spend while they try to calm investors down with slim cuts and useless adjustments to budget or policy.

They do this with the hopeful notion that things might readjust, maybe people start spending again, maybe some new invention will kick-start the economy, maybe Aliens will save us. But what they are really doing is buying time. Getting an extra month or an extra year so they can buy a getaway ticket. Getting more time so they can implement more internet restrictions, and impose more laws and build up a police state for protection. Of course many of them are pure idiots and as no clue what is going on, probably a majority of them, but such morons are followers and do whatever the owner of the ass their nose is stuck in says.

This means more months of debt accumulation. More regulations. More government. More fascism.

This means that problems will grow. Escalating from an already horrific height.

This means that when this thing blows it will not be only horrific, it will be far, far worse. You need to start looking into the book of revelations for adjectives to describe it. We are talking full-on bloody apocalyptical we-are-all-fucked scenes followed by famine, war and pestilence. I would go so far to say that nothing before in human history comes even close to what await us. Tens of millions will starve to death, trade wars will break out, the European Union will break up into smaller pieces, and it is very likely that civil wars are on the agenda in many countries, including China and the US.

Please also remember that you have voted for this, you wanted it, you have rooted for it, and many of you wants even more of it. Makes the whole armageddon experience more enjoyable.

…

As some of you know I try to keep an eye on alternative sources to see in what direction the economy is really going. The Baltic Dry cargo index, the number of shipping manifests, the number of distractions (wars, terror alerts, computer viruses etc.) that is thrown at us from above and similar thingies are often the best indicators.

But if you really want to know how the economy is going you should look at the sex- and weapons industries. When weapons goes up and sex goes down, then the shit is really about to hit the fan. Can you guess how these industries have performed during the latest couple of years? What the trends are? Yeah… that’s right…

…

I could go on, but my feeling is that we are closing in on it. I cannot put a time-stamp on it, mainly because I am still pissed that the whole thing didn’t stick to my predictions I made a decade ago saying that the big crash would have happened earlier this year.

All I can say is that it will happen. If it is a month from now (which we can hope) or if it is a couple of years down the line (brrrr…) is anyone’s guess. I hardly see this scam rolling more than 1,5-2 years though, and I think it would be hilariously funny if we officially entered the Greatest Depression in 2012. Wouldn’t you say so?

I do think they can still buy a little more time and with the media and almost all of the pundits bought and paid for, they can also continue to lie to us. So if nothing ‘scary’ happens, like a new big war or a nuclear explosion in London, we’ll probably roll along for a while yet.

Please just remember those oh so funny four words that I have been saying and will continue to repeat over and over and over again…

… I told you so.

A thought provoking clip

I really enjoyed this little vid. It is psychological, philosophical and it offers an alternative explanation to why the world continues to get flushed again, and again. I don’t necessarily agree and I believe that this is only a part explanation of what one should be aware of, but it is nevertheless worthy a watch. Get some of those synapses blinking.

What really frightens me

I come in peace

Honestly very few things get my fight or flight reaction going. I’ve seen too much and experienced so much crap in the game of life. Also I am a deeply rational and very cynical individual and all this in combination have made me into a person who psychologists probably would diagnose to have deep emotional problems.

Now, this isn’t as bad as it sounds, and I believe that psychology is crap for the most part anyway. Actually it is a good ability to have because it means I don’t get fooled by any charlatan with a bag of tricks and I can easily discard any sort of “reptiles walk among us” idiocy. I believe in science and I believe in a rational thought process. I also think this ‘ability’ can come in handy if I ever would be subjected to torture.

Death doesn’t scare me, consequently hardly anything worries me. I don’t go around thinking about things I cannot affect such as a sudden reversal of the magnetic poles or the potentiality of an asteroid hitting my car.

However there are things that do attract my attention and disturb me a little bit.

For example I get a shill in my rectum when hearing certain leaders of men talk about the scam of Manmade Global Warming. It is not really the actual scam that makes my sphincter pucker; no it is that there are actually people out there believing in it. And there are a lot of those asylum run-away’s out there, they are probably a vast majority.

I learned today that people exist in Sweden who has a special poop-bag next to the toilet. They also have a net, about the same sort of net you catch butterflies with. Apparently certain families scoop up the poop, puts it in the poop-bag, wipes themselves and then puts the paper in the wastebasket. (Makes you wonder why they have toilet in the first place.) They do this in order to Save the environment! This scares me more than any horror movie. An apocalyptic nuke-scenario cannot hold a candle to scooping-up-poop-families as far as I am concerned.

That animals’ now have court-appointed lawyers in Switzerland is also frightening. Get you to wonder what a hawk’s defense will sound like. “My client is innocent. That dove was clearly eaten by another animal”.

And then we have the newly appointed United Nations space ambassador. Mazlan Othman, a Malaysian astrophysicist who is set to be tasked with co-ordinating humanity’s response if and when extraterrestrials make contact. This appointment in itself is a clear sign that if ever space creatures wander the Earth's landscape in search of intelligent life; it is such a scarce resource that any Alien will certainly leave or blow up the planet to make an intergalactic highway. But do you know what kind of freaks me out? Look at her name. Mazlan Othman… M. Othman… Mothman!

Then we have the super virus Stuxnet. Apparently it is a powerful computer code attacking industrial facilities around the world, but mainly in Iran (they say in passing), that probably was created by experts working for a country or a well-funded private group, according to an analysis by a leading computer security company. It seems that no-one knows where it came from. It’s a complete unknown thing for everyone and experts are called out - paid for by the tax payer - from every dark corner to have meetings over this mystery and mumble that they don’t know.

Now this is frightening stuff.

It is a real brainteaser isn’t it? Who could it be? I am certainly gnawing on my hands in suspense over this one.

200 000 years of evolution and this level of intellect is what we have to show for it? Kind of scary if you ask me.

Like Batman who managed to avoid being frozen to death in a giant ice cream cone thanks to his "bat-thermal underwear" I do have an out. I laugh. Sometimes hysterically and not very convincing, but laughter is nevertheless a way to cope with the madness.

Personally I can’t wait to be abducted. This planet has gone absolutely nuts. So if there are any extraterrestrials out there, please do whatever you want with my anus and brain. Just take me the hell away from this fucked up rock. And if you blow it up and force me to watch I will promise to try to hide that smirk.

Beam me up Mrs Othman

Newt! I work for the UN, you are safe now...

I guess they are running out of ways to spend our money. At least that’s the first thing that came to my mind when reading this.

A space ambassador could be appointed by the United Nations to act as the first point of contact for aliens trying to communicate with Earth. Mazlan Othman, a Malaysian astrophysicist, is set to be tasked with co-ordinating humanity’s response if and when extraterrestrials make contact. Aliens who landed on earth and asked: “Take me to your leader” would be directed to Mrs Othman.

This would be sort of funny if it wasn’t for the fact that they are serious about it.

But okay, let’s assume for a moment that this post is relevant and necessary. It could happen you know, the chance that a intelligent Alien stops by or send us a message is about one in a billion, but still, it’s not totally unthinkable either.

However, if so is really an astrophysicist the best choice? Wouldn’t an anthropologist or, if we are to believe what most ‘experts’ seem to think is the most likely Aliens we’ll encounter, an entomologist a much better choice? Or why not the trickiest, most scheming no-good lying cheating bastard of politics? It seems to me that a thieving bureaucrat or a devious diplomat would be better suited.

I mean we are talking about extraterrestrials. What good is an astrophysicist if we are to talk with them, make deals, plead for our lives or trade gold for hyper drives? Sure she might be able to point towards their home in the stars or have a basic understanding of some of their math or gadgets, but that’s pretty much it.

Are we seriously going to put the faith of this planet and everyone on it in the hands of an astrophysicist working for the UN? We can just as well give up and volunteer for slavery and/or deliberately jump up on the dinner table to be nibble on.

Even scarier it becomes when you read:

“When we do, we should have in place a coordinated response that takes into account all the sensitivities related to the subject. The UN is a ready-made mechanism for such coordination.”

Really? So a totally corrupt organization that is practically run by dictators and soul-sucking diplomats, a organization hell-bent on increasing protectionism and imposing socialist guidelines to third world countries already have a ready-made mechanism in case ET stops by?

If there was any doubt before I can now say with the outmost confidence that we are truly, utterly, completely and royally fucked.

A wee update

I felt like it was time to do something about the layout. And maybe I can fool those revisiting FBI people (and other ‘security’ fuck-ups) that this is a completely different blog?

I believe it is better for the eye now, although not exactly like I want it so expect other alternations the coming days.

Spain – too little, too late

The government of Spain has approved an austerity budget, which includes a 7.7 percent spending cuts, 15 percent cuts in departmental spending; 5 percent reduction in government workers salaries and a tax hike on the wealthy.

This will, according to superbly scheming bureaucrats, save a couple of 100s of billions and hopefully reduces the country's budget deficit from 11.1 percent of GDP in 2009, to 9.3 percent this year, and down to 6 percent in 2011.

Let’s ignore for a moment that the EU has a targeted a maximum deficit of 3 percent for its member nations by 2013 (actually it should never exceed 3%). Let’s also ignore that such calculation by (any) government has never been correct before. Let’s also, for a moment, ignore the real estate and housing bubble and 20+ percent unemployment.

Let’s only look at this suggestion and think for a moment what will happen.

Firstly you gotto wonder why they aren’t cutting down to zero or rather run a surplus, which would be appropriate and necessary. Of course this is a political choice, not an economic one. It may be a good political compromise from the elitist’s perspective. Already facing general strikes and a country in turmoil doing too much at this moment may result in real upheaval. Also it can be a good thing to keep some of those institutions and organizations the government depends on for power in a fairly good mood. However, it is hard not to contemplate as to what comes next WHEN (not ‘if’) this plan fails.

Secondly what will this do to GDP and as a consequence the recovery? At least from a Keynesian perspective this is bad since everything in the Keynesian mind revolves around GDP and keeping spending up.

GDP is a scam, totally and fully. I have covered this scam before and you can go back and read, but let’s just confirm that in lowering government spending in addition to enforcing the proposed tax hikes that will only lead to tax evasion and “rich” people moving themselves or their money elsewhere, can and will lower GDP.

Reeling from the collapse of a debt-driven construction boom, Spain entered recession in the second quarter of 2008 and posted six consecutive quarters of negative growth, counted in GDP. Although the economy grew by 0.1 percent during the first quarter of 2010, Spain’s growth prospects are poor, and with this budget it will get poorer.

The combination of negative GDP growth, rising unemployment, and a high deficit has raised concerns about the sustainability of Spain’s finances. Indeed, two international ratings agencies, Fitch and Standard & Poor’s, have recently lowered Spain’s long-term sovereign credit rating, citing the risk of a prolonged period of below-par economic growth and persistently high fiscal deficits.

This budget will in all likelihood, at least in the short term, increase this risk and so probably lower the Spanish credit rating further.

Actually I would, in this case, almost agree with Keynesians. This small and very inefficient budget proposal will lower GDP, increase the risk of getting even worse credit rating and will have very little, if any, positive impact on stability and the economy. In fact the socialist government may very well face a bloodbath curtsey of their leftie voters that will feel abandoned, betrayed and fooled. And this for measures that are wrong, have no positive impact and are really too little and too late.

Either do, or don’t. That’s what should be the motto. Instead it’s a political compromise of the worst kind.

I have before warned about the lurking housing collapse of Spain. “Economists”, useless as ever, seem to argue that the worst is over in Spain and that they need to ride out the storm. This is so wrong it is laughable.

They have borrowed and spent hundreds of billions of Euros on building projects that will NEVER be paid off. And the Spanish government is liable for most of it. Either directly or indirectly. And very little of this gargantuan scam have reached daylight. Mark my words, when this sucker blows it will blow the entire country away. And after that I see no reason for why it wouldn’t expand and become the next spark to light the fire of our humorous financial Armageddon.

The enemy class of Spain has, just as the puppet masters of every country out there has, started a spiral of doom they cannot get out of and the ONLY thing they are trying to do is to paper over the problem with small, petite, useless solutions that either will do things worse or only buy more time for them to get away.

There are a lot of problems out there. Looking at numbers coming from the US its hard to imagine them being able to keep the scam going for much longer, but they are the world’s biggest economy and have a built up a reputation over the years that will take time to cave in. Japan is in such a mess it is a miracle they are still floating. Chinas bubbles, the wars, inflation running amok everywhere and all the stimulus have just run out of steam...

Will Spain be the tipping point to get the tsunami rolling over the world? Maybe, but it’s really a crapshoot. Anyone of these fuck-ups can falter and die at any moment. All I am waiting for is that it will happen. And it will probably be sooner rather than later.

Final thoughts on the Swedish election

Last Sunday Sweden held its general election and in the preliminary result the centre-right parties in the Alliance won the largest support, 49.3 per cent, compared to 43.7 per cent for the centre-left Red-Green coalition. The anti-immigration party the Sweden Democrats was able to gain 5.7 per cent, and will thus take seats in the Parliament and will probably hold the swing vote.

This means that the Alliance will have to try to form a minority government.

However, there is a small but yet a chance that the absent ballots, the last postal and expat votes, could give the Alliance an absolute majority. But as it look right now it seems that the final count will show that only a couple of hundred of votes are missing - in total (haha…) - for the current right-center government to get majority in the Swedish Riksdag (parliament). Instead we’ll have a minority rule with the government going back and forth to secure votes.

I find this hilariously funny, especially since I, and many I had convinced, supported the libertarian alternative. With 713+ votes going to the Libertarian Party of Sweden you could argue that this was the decisive factor.

Of course this isn’t exactly so because many thousands of votes also went to the Pirate Party. Votes that otherwise may have landed in support of the sitting government. And so you cannot really know how things would have turned out if the government had exchanged their fascist Justice Minister or ignored the pleas and bribes from the entertainment industry in order to roll out the Orwellian surveillance nightmare. But it is hard to see how they could lose votes if they had done so, and if I’m right they lost majority because of me and others like me that may have considered voting for them if they’d made such changes.

Of course there are now calls for changing the electoral process and how votes are counted. No big surprise there, the righteous elitists need to secure their power and make sure that people voting wrong not have the final say. Also we got an anti-immigration party in the parliament and this will not do. The elitists may argue they don’t like these “racists” because of their views, but this is only partly true. The truth is that our puppet masters don’t like losing seats, money and prestige and that’s what this is really about. So again we can read about how ‘wrong’ it is that a small racist party can gain a swing vote - sort of implying that something about counting votes process needs to change.

"There is nothing wrong with your television. Do not attempt to adjust the picture"

713+ (not final count) votes going to the newly formed Libertarian party may not sound like much, but bear in mind that there was no real effort, the party has no money whatsoever and a vast majority of the Swedish populace doesn’t even know the existence of such a party. Also most of the supposed libertarians in Sweden do vote for the existing parties in parliament. Some do this because the alternative (communists and climatologists) is worse and others do it because they have nothing against selling their souls for a seat or a pat on the back.

With this in mind I think the libertarians did a good job and there’s only up from here.

And although I do detest the sitting (and continuously governing) Swedish government with their control-grids, their growing fascist views and horrible stupidities I also agree with the soul-selling spineless ‘libertarian’ morons that voted for them; the alternative is worse.

At least Sweden managed to avoid getting the ugliest Prime Mentalist (the Social Democratic leader) ever seen in the Western World, and that’s something to take comfort in when the next wave of economic Armageddon roles in over us in the near future.

Congratulations

I do think that congratulations to the Swedish Democrats (SD) are in order. They haven’t yet arrived at parliament and are already gaining so much free and great publicity I hardly see the sky as the limit anymore.

A short recap.

The government seems to think that lowering the number of seats in committees will keep SD out of the decision-making process. Ping! Another 1% voters gained!

Newspapers are finding “revealing” stuff each day such as a couple of SD’s having Nazi ties. Nooo, really? And apparently some of these new parliamentarians have a shady past. Ping! Another 0,2% votes gained!

Demonstrations against racism and SD go on everywhere. In other words demonstrations against the 5,5-6% of the voters that voted for SD, which is how it will be perceived. Ping! The determination of SD voters strengthens!

Since the “Jury’s” of Sweden’s courts are politically appointed (yeah… that’s right…) certain voices are being heard that people will lose their respect in the justice system now with lots of SD sitting there deciding the faith of criminals. Ping! Undecided voters are beginning to wonder if SD can be their choice coming elections.

Stories meant to scare are run every day. So called “experts” give their view on SD and their shady past. Ping! Free publicity money can’t buy!

And, probably most humorous of all, those that voted SD are apparently disillusioned young men protesting against the establishment. The conclusion is that this was a protest and people only voted wrong because they felt like they are outside the normal fold, not really thinking, only acting on a whim. Protesting. Only. They didn’t know anything about SD and were fooled into voting “racist” because they are unemployed or didn’t know better. PING!! Another 1% voters gained and the ones that did vote SD are more determined than ever!

Seeing how youngsters in schools across the country voted (SD were much bigger than among the adult population) I hardly see the Swedish Democrats going down in the polls. They are doubling their numbers already. All thanks to the idiot left, the corporate media, bought and paid for journalists and an elitist sphere that don’t know how to react when some outsiders steal their seats of power.

There’s no reflection on what they could have done, said or changed comes to immigration or comes to the elderly or the justice system to prevent SD to gain momentum. Not a single soul has contemplated on why a country hell-bent on collectivism and why after a century of We-Against-Them thinking could let anti-immigration collectivists into parliament. Well, I am shocked… not…

There’s no thinking or discussions on how to relate to this situation. Only disgust, revulsion and a unified response of continued bullying.

Of course stone throwing hooded anarchists, window crashing communists and moronic socialists crying the word “racist” over and over again will hand over another 1% of voters.

So congratulations SD. You have made it and you will continue to grow. Say thankya to your adversaries, they are doing the entire job for you.

Some people voted racist eh?

The general election in Sweden is over. Well, sort of. Media is still milking every little none-story. The big talk is of course how so many people could be foolish enough to vote “racist”. A populist party making it into parliament for the first time is horrible. Isn’t it?

And again mainstream media and the established parties are scratching themselves pondering how a party they drum out to be ‘racists’ can gain support. A party that to a large extent is frozen out from general debates has very little money and has a hard time finding office space shouldn’t be able to attract voters. The righteous elitists have done and continue to do everything they can to label these horrid foes with the vilest epithets imaginable. Still the Swedish Democrats (SD) keep climbing the polls and the established parties seems to have no countermeasure other than continue the bashing.

Both the government and the opposition have solemnly declared that they will never form a coalition with the “racists” and that they will cut them out as much as possible. In the meantime journalists are competing in the game of who can trash and ridicule SD the most.

They still don’t get it.

You see it doesn’t matter if journalists find criminals within SD, which party hasn’t criminals as members? Aren’t they all criminals? What if some article or pamphlet is riddled with holes? How many of the elitists aren’t lying to us each day? Are we supposed to care more because one party gets “caught” lying but not the other one?

I need to tell you that this post isn't actually about SD. It is not a post in support of the SD nor is it a post attacking the SD. This is about what is happening to the SD and why they get voters so look again, and ask if it could happen to you.

Would your government take a view opposing yours and silence you, and those who would speak for you, and refuse to countenance any debate at all that would let you have a say? Would your government use lies and deceit to override anything you might want to do or say? Would your government use the law against you, demonise and punish you, encourage others to treat you as subhuman, for no other reason than they just don't like you?

Do you smoke? Drink? Drive? Are you a little on the portly side?

Can you see why the SD support is growing? It's not because people are all suddenly racist, it's not even because people are all suddenly in tune with SD because they have pretty much the same policies and opinions as all the rest of them. The only real difference between SD and the rest of the political sphere is a slightly more bigoted focus on immigration issues.

People have seen the way the government are working on SD and they are thinking about that while they shiver outside for a smoke, while they queue in those bars for a overtaxed drink that comes with warning labels, while they hear talk about speed cameras that don't flash so you don't know whether you're fined until the letter arrives. They are reading about fat people beaten up for being fat, they are watching the information campaigns sending hateful messages against smokers, they are consoling children scared to death by the drowning puppies of the global warming religion, they are wondering why their government thinks they are all pedophiles, they are wondering why the government needs to poke around their computer and read their emails.

People aren't looking at the treatment of the SD and thinking 'They could do that to me'.

They are thinking 'They have done that to me'.

The elitists tell us that SD are evil racists. Well, they've already told me I am evil because I use tobacco. I'm even more evil because I like a drink. I'm yet more evil because my salt and fat intake is nowhere near the recommended amounts. I'm a crazed 'global warming denier'. I will not take the vaccine, and I, oh gosh, don’t vote. Can you find a more evil person than me? Looking at the list of things this government calls me evil for being and doing, Satan had better watch out for his job. So when they call SD evil, I'm supposed to consider that a different type of evil or something?

At the very least people instinctively feel this and they have reacted to it.

Secondly you have to stand in aw over the complete lack of understanding for how people, that exists in our time and space - which is far, far away from the world of politics - are bloody tired of the political correctness that oozes out from the righteous sphere. When did it become “racist” to wave the flag? When was the popular vote on banning church on graduation? Why can’t we be proud of being Swedish, English, American or whatever? Why can’t we celebrate our old traditions or sing the songs of our ancestors?

People get a fine for having a flag on the balcony, people get labeled as xenophobes because they like listening to country music, and people that are having a problem walking past a bunch of black kids at night are racist.

Why is SD gaining momentum again..?

But the thing our puppet master does get and why they hardly do anything about these problems is because of power. The power of fear.

Maybe it is an unconscious choice for many politicians, but for some of them it is a very real and very powerful tool to have – you afraid.

A frightened populace is a controllable populace.

Why do you think they are selling the Orwellian surveillance society with notions of pedophiles and terrorists? Why do you think they are scaring you with images of starving or hurting people every time they want to pass legislation?

They want you to fear those that aren’t like you. If people have another religion, culture or color they are dangerous. Right? Muslims want us all dead - this we know. And this is not knowledge acquired from supposed racist parties; we get this knowledge from the established ones. The same goes with hackers, smokers, fat people and male teachers. People are evil and the only ones that can save the people from evil people are the people that govern people.

So why is it such a surprise that SD got voted into parliament? They are selling the same thing: Fear. Why wouldn’t people listen? Because this “fear” isn’t real but all the other scary things sold by the establishment is real?

Some “thinkers” have argued that SD gain support because they play the sympathy card and are anti-establishment types. Well, duh! That’s like arguing that the sun rises in the east. Of course this is the case, but if you really want to know ‘why’ I have just told you.

There are millions out there who have been demonised and been labeled by the righteous elite. So, again, why would they not vote SD?

SD is here to stay and they will continue to grow in the next election four years from now. You don’t need to be a fortune teller to know this, all you really need is a brain.

Gold again

Do you own some of this?

One reoccurring topic on this blog has been about the element that holds the atomic number of 79. Not because I like "shining dawn" or because that it has been, and still is, a good investment. It’s not even about the market manipulations that are very obvious when it comes to precious metals.

Gold is fun to write about because every single so called “expert” out there has been wrong for the last 15 years, and they continue to be wrong. Oh, did I say “wrong”? I actually mean they have been so off the mark that all of them should have been shot by now. And the fun thing is that you don’t even need to know anything about finance or gold to know that the “experts” are idiots. All you really need is a brain.

Gold has recently hit new heights. Again. And again the so called “experts” thinks that it’s a rally, or gold is overvalued, or that it has now peaked.

As said; idiots.

8th of December 2009 I wrote this: Apocalypse Nowish

On 17th of September 2009 I wrote this: Apocalypse Nowish

On 11th of August 2009 I wrote this: Apocalypse Nowish

Just to give some of the many times I’ve pointed out how fantastic buy gold is. And it still is.

There is one other reason to keep an eye on gold prices – inflation. Throughout history the one single constant that has never failed as a sign of bad times up ahead is the rise of gold in price compared to other goods. Whenever gold surges like has for a long time now and in particular the latest year or two, you can be almost 100% sure that inflation is running amok and/or something really bad is about to happen.

You see inflation isn’t visible at first. It takes time for it to trickle through the system. Also those who get inflated money first are the winners and they want as big and as many winnings they can get before letting us normal suckers crash and burn.

Please bear in mind that what I am talking about is INFLATION, not higher prices. The rich and powerful, your government and pretty much every lowlife amoeba handing out financial advice want you to believe that higher prices are equal to inflation. It isn’t. It is not even close. And even if it was prices can be manipulated via taxation, political decisions or any number of ways.

Some out there think we’re heading for a deflationary depression. Maybe so, but the real danger isn’t deflation if we think of it as “lower prices and no cash in the system”, the danger comes from the printing press. Every country on this planet has been printing money in such amounts that we could probably fill the Mediterranean with money by now. They do this in order to “avoid the depression”, which is funny, not ha-ha funny, rather lavaflow-into-your-bedroom kind of funny.

As you can see in above posts I wrote that I think gold will peak around $2300/ounce. And I still believe that, but that’s without taking into account currency manipulations. You see all of them, every government out there; have been doing the same thing. That’s why no currencies have defaulted and crashed yet. They have tricked you. Currencies that, in comparison with other currencies, should burn in hell by now are still “alive” partly because of this scam and partly because of other scams.

In real terms gold will probably peak around that prediction of mine, but against the USD the 10 000 mark isn’t farfetched to imagine.

I would like you all to start writing down the names of the people arguing against buying gold. They are either complete morons or they lying to you. Either way, they should be on your hitlist cometh the greatest depression in human history. Soon our world will be in flames, both figuratively and literarily. Anti-gold idiots should be stringed up alongside politicians, banksters, journalists and others from the enemy class. So please take notes.

Teaching Negroes how to clean penises

I don't know how to clean my penis

Apparently the Dark Continent is filled with people (males) that have no clue how to wash “downstairs”.

In true colonial fashion The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), a division of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), spent $823,200 of economic stimulus funds in 2009 on a study by a UCLA research team to teach uncircumcised African men how to wash their genitals after having sex.

Apparently AIDS researchers have been unsuccessful in convincing most adult African men to undergo circumcision, and so the UCLA study proposes to determine whether researchers can develop an after-sex genitalia-washing regimen that they can then convince uncircumcised African men to follow.

To me this is a very strange, all throughout.

Firstly, what has circumcisions to do with AIDS? As far as I know, and from what can read online, AIDS spreads regardless of skin around the head of the penis or not. Two totally unrelated issues. Secondly I hardly see how thousands of years of civilization, even seen to countries in Africa, have missed something as obvious as to washing up or cleaning oneself. Thirdly, is this really something that can save the US’s economy? Apparently as it was a part of the stimulus…

As said, very strange.

And isn’t this racism? I am not really a politically correct individual, and I do think that the racist card is played way too often, but in this case? Teaching black people how to wash their genitals? Bordering on racism to me.

Finally I also like to point out that the only time I feel like I don’t want to keep my penis “clean” is after sex. That smell and feeling of female juices is a keeper.

In any case I hope Americans are happy knowing were their money goes. $823,200 to teach cleaning of the penis? Yes, money well spent...

The home of the Brave

After branding people that believes in the American constitution as terrorists I’ve just been waiting for the next phase of the nightmare that formally was known as USA.

In some distant dark dimension you could, maybe, feel sympathetic towards American authorities suspecting and labeling people that owns vans and people who like Ron Paul as potential terrorists. You could, in such a dark and infested place, also understand why military personnel getting back home and armed citizens is under the scrutiny of FBI. The list of suspects is very long and getting longer for each day that passes.

However, making up phony terrorists and seeing suspects everywhere isn’t enough...

Sky News
Luke Angel was reprimanded by police on both sides of the Atlantic after firing off a drunken message to the White House calling the president a "prick".

The FBI intercepted the message and contacted police in the UK who went to see the 17-year-old at his home in Silsoe, Bedfordshire.

Luke, a college student, is now on a list of people who are banned from visiting the States.

I’ve frequently called the Obamination for much worse things on this blog, so I guess this answers the question whether I could fly over the Atlantic or not. FBI have stopped by here a couple of times too, but no police have come by at my home as of yet.

Anyway, I could be perceived as threat. I do write about revolutions and that politicians should be stringed up. In the eyes of those in charge I guess this can be seen as bad, even though this is a blog and I do take things a little too far. However, a drunk teenager several thousands of miles across an ocean writing a semi-profanity? Please…

What the hell are they doing? Is this how a brave nation acts? Is this how a free society reacts to intoxicated youngsters writings?

A Bedfordshire Police spokesman said: "The individual sent an email to the White House full of abusive and threatening language.

"We were informed by the Metropolitan Police and went to see him. He said, 'Oh dear, it was me'."

Officers will take no criminal action.

Okay, so there will be no charges, no trial, no prison, and no action whatsoever. Apparently this wasn’t even a crime then, but he’s still banned. For life. Banned from visiting the US of A.

I have a lot of abusive things to say about the pickpocket in Chief and his cronies at the FBI, but in this case I think the English authorities and their strange behavior is an equally liable target.

Anyway America doesn’t exist anymore, it’s just another fallen empire among many - and this story is a proof as good as any that this statement is true.

Want a reward? Become a war-criminal!

Since the warmongering Obamination won the Nobel Peace Prize I’ve just waited for the next criminal to win an award. The Nobel Peace Prize seem to come with a label that demands a certain amount of murdered, raped and tortured - otherwise you cannot win it.

The Philadelphia-based National Constitution Centre apparently has similar reasons for handing out their medals because now the former Prime Minister Tony Blair has received the Liberty Medal for his global human rights work and commitment to international conflict resolution.

That’s nice, isn’t it? Kill enough people, start a couple of wars, destroy the economy and lie about it and you get a medal or a peace prize.

Blair who lately has been out journeying signing his new book was praised by Bill Clinton during the ceremony. Former President Clinton said Blair was a "wonderful world citizen" and "living a life worthy of this award".

Out in the real world Blair has been facing hostile crowds that have thrown shoes and eggs at him at a book-signings in Dublin and London, but facing another representative of the enemy class he gets a medal…

This is what the world has come to. The enemies of the people eat, dine, party and throw rewards at each other (all of which you pay for) while issuing “save the earth” statements. In the real world unemployment is very high, inflation runs wild and debt mountains climbs higher than ever before.

“Let ‘em eat cake”

When will it be enough? When will you stop throwing shoes and start throwing knives? When will the guillotine come out again? I guess it cannot be too far until that happens.

So ask me again why I think this world is facing a very scary scenario very soon when the world markets collapse…

Who doesn’t like sexual torture?

Oh yeah! Baby!

Almost every day we can read about and hear about new inventive ways for the power elitists to impose more and more control over our lives. One of the most common ways of doing this is to appeal to our indignation, our dubious sexual morals and how we see ‘others’.

If someone think that gay sex or golden showers are pretty disgusting, it is not that hard to convince that someone that we need legislation to hinder such acts. The same goes for pretty much everything that has to do with sex and relationships.

Throughout the years I have learned that pretty much everyone is into some kind of kinky stuff. We all have our fetishes; we all have strange erotic fantasies and with the right person/s we can live them out. Frankly the ones being content with the missionary varied with doggy once a week never feeling the need to try something else and never testing perversities make up a very, very small minority.

Strange then that so many feel indignation and get morally outraged whenever something “out of the norm” gets depicted in the news. Or is this maybe the real reason? We feel slight disgust with ourselves or want to hide our own perversities so we attack those that do the same?

Whatever the reason I cannot understand how anyone can let authorities in general and media in particular again and again undermine our personal liberties with stories of ‘strange’ sexacts. You can almost forgive them for using rapes, pedophilia and such in this manner, but consensual adults have fun? What’s up with that?

So it is not surprising to learn about today’s big story in Swedish papers. Apparently a 32-year-old man (age is important when there’s a difference between the two) charged with assault after having violent sex with a teenager in a case testing how much sexual violence is legally permitted in Sweden between consenting partners.

The 16-year-old girl (15 is the legal age in Sweden) came in contact with the man through a sexually-themed website and later signed a “slave contract” in which she consented to being “used, abused and thoroughly humiliated”.

During their sexual encounter, the girl ALLOWED herself to be locked in a cage and have clamps attached to her breasts.

Police were alerted to the alleged assault when a relative of the teen noticed she had bruises all over her body.

The court shouldn’t have anything to do with a case like this and we should all be out in the streets demonstrating against this horrible act of autocracy. Journalists should be defending people’s rights to have whatever sexual act they want. But no. Of course not.

With the risk of getting charged I can honestly say that I’ve done much worse things and I have, myself, been subjected to worse things. And having bruises after sex is so normal I would even argue that a sexual encounter that doesn’t end with bruising is equal to bad sex. Of course you can avoid such things with acts that don’t really involve touching like stroking a feather over a body or masturbating in front of each other, but a penetration party with pretty “normal” sex almost always lead to at least one or two bruises.

Having clamps on breasts or in other places are very common and so is some smacking, spanking etc. So what is the problem here? Why does the court feel it necessary to bring such a case to trial?

Well first it is the “age-thing”. A 16y old girl shouldn’t have sexual desires. Even in our time and age women’s sexuality is almost a taboo subject. And having desires that borders to torture with an elderly man? Oh… that’s horrible.

Secondly - and this is really the important part - authorities like to show us who’s in charge. They cannot let us get away with personal feelings and have our own way of doing things. They want us to feel ashamed and being uncertain about what we can and cannot do. This is how they govern. They want us afraid and they want us feeling monitored.

You should be outraged that the court is taking two consenting peoples sexact to trial. This is the ultimate test of despotism, if they get away with this, they can get away with anything. If you let them dictate your sexlife you have lost.

So if any female (couples, or groups) out there want to test exactly the thing mentioned in the news about this case, please let me know. I’ll be there in a heartbeat, and will even do worse. I like everything with sex. Everything from soft kissing in candlelight’s to rough cage-spanking in the dungeon. I will never let anyone tell me otherwise, and neither should you.

Scary stuff is going on

Mwa ha ha ha!

Yesterday I pointed out that something strange is festering within ECB and that this is veiled from unbelievers. Yet another sign for this were shown today when the European Central Bank's chairman, Jean-Claude Trichet, issued a fuming attack towards Slovakia for their refusal to subsidize the Greek freeloaders.

You see the Slovakian government refuse to conform to the wishes of the high council of übermench at ECB. This will not do.

Apparently Slovakians don’t understand the need for conformity. Without a concise set of rules to follow we would probably all have to, like in the Slovakian example, resort to common sense. Discipline is the key to conformity and it is important that we learn not to question authority. And here my post from yesterday ends up in a new light.

The grotesque conformity general of ECB revealed that had he known that Slovakia was going to refuse to participate in similar money transfers, his ECB would have vetoed the Slovak accession to the eurozone. Also, he said that if there are other countries that are at risk of misbehaving in the same way, he will veto their entry in the future.

Again I do guess one or two Europhiles regard this little outburst of autocracy as something positive. After all the rules are there for a reason and if a consensus has been reached, why would one member refuse to follow? However, if this is a reason to comply one should remember that ECB have repeatedly ignored and circumvent their own rules. In particular when it comes to the Greek bailout.

Also I hope I am not the only one getting very scary vibes from this guy and these recent statements from ECB. And I'm not only refering to the fact that they are still hiding important stuff from us lower beings, but rather the feeling of the whole thing. The attitude. And even their choice of words.

ECB and EU is getting scarier for each day that passes and I hope I am not the only one seeing it.

He´s wrong

One political leader in Sweden has said he has a hard time seeing any difference between the anti-democratic racist party and the anti-democratic communist party. Of course the lefties are going through the roof on this one wondering how the guy can’t make the distinction.

I do wonder the same myself. The so called “racists” in this case do sprung from neo-Nazis and have strange ideas about collectivism and democracy, but all in all they are not that much different (today) in comparison to the rest of the political bunch. In any case, even if they were openly fascists they would still not hold a candle to communists.

So of course this particular political leader was wrong in his statement. Making a choice between the political party that has been dubbed “racist” or the communists isn’t a choice.

I would prefer Muslim fundamentalists over communists’. I would rather eat a cactus covered in manure than even think the thought of voting communist.

The worst ideology, the worst mass murdering thought of all human history VS a supposed “racist” party that’s really just like all the rest? That’s not a choice, the comparison isn’t even relevant.

The “racists” may very well be racists, some of them are in any case and from my experience their followers are complete morons. But in this case they stand as shining beacons of sanity and normality in comparison with the nastiest people that has ever inhabited this planet.

And so it continues…

On a good day it gets this big...

In an interview with Financial Times, Jean-Claude Trichet, the president of the European Central Bank, proposed that Eurozone members that break the region's rules on public finances should be excluded temporarily from Europe’s political decision-making.

On a first look at such a statement maybe it doesn’t sound too bad. I mean they should have some leverage, some kind of punishment against rough elements not doing what has been decided. Right? Europhiles will probably have nothing against this interpretation or usage of any such potential rules.

However, we need to consider two things here; even a real hardliner Euro-lover should do the same.

Firstly we need to see his statement in context with the rest of the interview wherein he, among other things, said that “we need the same rules at the global level” and described the rise in importance of the Group of 20 summits, which also include China and India, as “one of the major structural transformations of global governance over the last three years”.

Straight out of A-Z book for NWO-conspiracy nuts isn’t it? But you don’t need to put on your favorite tin-foil hat to see a future were the world economies (in reality its leaders) dictates interest rates and money policies on a global scale. That is the future we are seemingly heading for and a decade or two down the line I would be very surprised if that’s not a reality.

Secondly this is a statement that cannot be implemented today (or soon) in the Eurozone. The asymmetric shocks, people’s unwillingness to comply to with the wishes of the European parliament and an already very upset populace in the more sensible countries paying for the less prudent ones’ mistakes, makes such an suggestion very hard to follow through. In essence Mr Trichet is actually saying something to accomplish something else.

I can only think of one thing that could make him utter such a stupidity right now; another country is about to default. Maybe they are about to revealed that they have found yet another hundred billion Euroes of Greek debt hidden away, but I feel it is far more likely that another country need a rescue package.

If so, then his statement will be a prelude to making and passing such legislation a couple of years from now, because if yet another country shows horrid numbers and is heading for a fall, such a suggestion can be taken seriously and would make more sense to a dumb down populace. He cannot pass such legislation today, but tomorrow with more problems or something more to point at, he might be able to.

In either case there is a fishy smell over this guy and his suggestion. Something isn’t being said. I can bet my right shoe that there is something he’s not telling us. Stay tuned to find out what it is.

I can hardly wait, can you?