Con-artists to investigate frauds

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have been caught fiddling numbers, hiding facts, bullying opponents and outright lying in the name of science. Anyone reading the Climategate emails or checking what these tricksters use as “scientific material” (the ‘material’ that’s not SECRET that is) need to stand in awe over how evil these thugs are.

Among other things we now know that one single tree in Siberia is responsible for the famous hockey-stick graph. We know that only data supporting their pre-determined view is used, all the rest of the data is ignored or hidden away. We know that they actively persecute and thrash anyone arguing against them. We know that both earlier and later proven faulty data is used and they do so intentionally.

This is facts. This we know.

But such revelations and a slight turn in the public consciousness is a danger to this agenda. The tens of billions pouring into their ‘research’ and the hundreds of billions earned and invested by big oil, different governments and outright evil companies like Goldman Sachs needs the boogeyman to live on. They cannot have people questioning worldwide taxation, emission swaps and the lavish lifestyle of the rich and famous.

They need to show how scientifically accurate they are, they need to put a foot down “clear out the faults” so we start believing again. As long as the Church of Climatology isn’t worshiped without hesitation by a large majority the scams cannot continue unhindered.

So what better way to restore their slightly dented power than to have an “independent revue”?

Said and done. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has consequently asked the world's science academies to review the work of IPCC. He did this by stating:

"Let me be clear - the threat posed by climate change is real"

And if that clear message wasn’t enough he continued:

"I have seen no credible evidence that challenges the main conclusions of [the IPCC's 2007] report."

And with this mission statement the InterAcademy Council (IAC) will review IPCC.

Am I the only one seeing the problem here?

Oh, but wait. If the mission of IAC wasn’t clear enough, wait ‘till you know how “independent” they are. This is like sending out wolfs to investigate why the fox got into the henhouse. Well, in all fairness to wolfs, they probably would be more independent.

Anyway, taking a wee look at the IAC do you know who their partner organizations are? You guessed it; over half that can be seen on their webpage are UN programs. The rest is the World Bank and other international academy groups. And if that isn’t enough how about the fact that the same people that has appointed the IPCC folks are the very same people that has appointed IAC folks.

And their website is filled with things about climate change. These are hardliner Climate Church goers. They pray at the altar of the Polar Bear God and they are going to check their pals at UN?

(inhale)

(exhale)

Aaahh!

Oh, but wait ‘till you hear what Robbert Dijkgraaf, the IAC council's co-chair, said about the review panel. This is the stuff of fiction if I ever seen one.

"The panel will look forward and will definitely not go over all the vast amount of data in climate science," he said and continued; "It will see what are the [IPCC's] procedures, and how can they be improved, so we can avoid certain types of errors."

When I see this I read: “We are a part of the same Church so we will not check any beliefs, only go over how they can be better at hiding the decline so no hacker or blogs can spread the truth in the future.”

Of course they will condemn one or two things, just to show how goodigoodgood review they’ve done. Maybe a slap on some fingers, just to be on the safe side. But the end result we already know as stated by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon above "Let me be clear - the threat posed by climate change is real"

And have you noticed how they hardly ever write or say MANMADE global warming anymore? That’s because there is no such thing. It never was and never will be. If you check any of their claims of this, just pick one and go search for the evidence and you’ll find nothing, nada, zip. There is no such thing.

Climate change however exists. Always have, always will. Easier to sell a scam if you use a perfectly normal fact to hide your religion behind isn’t it?

So the Earth will continue to spin, Polar Bears will continue to increase in numbers, the coldest winter in memory is soon over and they will continue to take your money to pay for their trickery. Isn’t the world a fun place?