Sometimes one wonders what governments are doing. Apparently Sweden doesn’t have enough elected politicians and other criminals, now they are importing from prisons in other countries as well. Annika Östberg is a lady that helped out murdering two people in California 1981 and have until now been imprisoned “over there”. Now she has been transported to Sweden to serve the rest of her punishment, which could be as little as a couple of months. I don’t get it. Why should the Swedish taxpayers suddenly pay for living quarters and, in all probability, welfare for this killer? Sure, this lady might feel better and after a couple of decades in prisons one might even feel she has done her time, but still there is no real logic. But on the other hand, those politicians that sprung her are doing worse crimes every day and they get paid for it with money they steal from their victims. In that perspective it isn’t so bad to have another killer joining in the fun. So even if she should have been left to rot on the other side of the Atlantic, welcome home Annika!
Det är ingen mördare, det är en svensk medborgare, thats why, stupid.
ReplyDeleteLet me translate that for you, "She is not a murderer, she is a Swedish citizen..."
ReplyDeleteAnd I can't agree more! She did not murder anyone but was set up by her coward boyfriend that later comitted suicide instead of taking the blame before a jury.
""But on the other hand, those politicians that sprung her are doing worse crimes every day and they get paid for it with money they steal from their victims""
ReplyDeletePlease explain that further, I guess you must be confusing politicians in the UK and US that rusna roundt he world bombing people with politicians in the country with the longest running peace in world history.
I read some of you other stuff on this blog and I came tot he conclusion that you are a very hateful person, this is a hate blog.
Well the information available about Annika’s exploits tells me she could as easily been holding the gun herself. And she was convicted for it. Seems pretty straight forward to me. And Swedish citizen or not, who care? People cannot travel around killing people and then claiming: “Well, I’m Swedish, please send me home”. That’s stupid. If you do the crime, do the time.
ReplyDelete"I believe that people on this planet, generally speaking, are a very brainless bunch. Most individuals do not use their intellect, they are not rational and they pretty much believe everything that governments and the political correct tells them. Consequently we are heading for a fall. As before in history, there are dictators waiting in the wings to make the best out of people’s stupidity."
ReplyDeleteCouldn't agree more. Unfortunately for you, you seem to be of the brainless variety...
I agree, if you do the crime you do the time. However, 30 years for not killing anyone is enough time for me.
ReplyDeleteHow many years would you consider is enough if your imaginary girlfriend killed two people?
It's a serious a crime to kill or assist in killing a cop in any part of the world. We have produced some in Sweden as well. although no punishment will bring back the victims society must act. In the God will fine...
ReplyDeleteHate blog? Haha... no. “Contempt” would probably not be wrong to write, but I don’t hate anyone.
ReplyDeleteAnd yes, politicians kill people everyday. Through laws and restrictions they kill and cause real crimes to be committed. One of hundreds of examples: Around 500 people die from overdose each year in Sweden, most wouldn’t if the laws were different.
"... was set up by her coward boyfriend..."
ReplyDeleteShe helped him reload the gun and didn't do anything to prevent the murder. Neither did she do anything to help the police catch the boyfriend.
"Assist in killing" is very dubious considering her situation as the time. So if someone is speeding and you are sitting in the back of the car, you should force the guy driving to slow down, at the risk of you own life - or you commit the crime of speeding? Maybe it was Mr. Obama who was smart enough to see this.
ReplyDeleteWelcome home Annika! We "Sweden" is the most modern country in the world, G da.. it!
Well getting let out by the horrifying Obaminator should be a certain way of knowing that this woman doesn’t belong anywhere besides the deepest caves of hell. But this is probably a money issue more then anything else. If they can transmit the cost on to the Swedish taxpayers and get rid of a murderer it is a great deal for the Americans. They have their own socialist problems to deal with and can leave this little problem for the Swedish left government.
ReplyDeleteSeriously? First of all your title is wrong, sure she assisted in a murder of a cop and an owner of a shop, but that doesn't make her a murderer. second of all, what the hell? Yes you don't shoot cops, but you shouldn't go around shooting and killing anyone. and people would still die of overdose even if the laws were different because they would still get the stuff. That's on them, not the politicians. They can't be responsible for people's own actions.
ReplyDeleteShe was by the way convicted for assisting in the murder of the SHOPOWNER and the COP. At least now she'll get a time on how long she has to be in prison in Sweden.
""apocalypse nowish said...
ReplyDelete...Around 500 people die from overdose each year in Sweden, most wouldn’t if the laws were different.""
Oh, I see now, you are one of those drug liberals that think the world would be much better if everyone were as stoned as you are all the time.
That certainly explains your views in this blog, hate everything except your bong.
She helped her boyfriend reload his weapon during the gunfight with the Police, she knew what she was doing, no doubt about that...
ReplyDeleteOh, this is starting to get fun. I should have written about letting out convicted murderers before. I ought to have known that soft-hearted lefties everywhere would get upset over someone arguing against letting criminals roam free.
ReplyDeleteAnd yes, people would still be doing overdoses and die from it, even if the laws were different, but many of those dying today dies because of lack of good information about drugs and because one needs to visit the man in trench-coat in the dark ally to get drugs instead of the supermarket. But even worse is the mafia and drug lords that is created thanks to the governmental laws and their violent behaviour. How many hundreds or even thousands of people would not get stabbed, shot or in other ways harmed if those organisations went away?
And drugs are not the only way governments kill people. If we ignore the obvious ones like wars and stuff (that the Swedish government isn’t really doing anyways) we can still look at taxation and regulations. Not only does this make people poorer and more likely to turn to the bottle, it also means that those people in the world we could be trading more with suffer as well. More then likely millions of death can be contributed to taxation. Than you have completely idiotic things like aid programs that go to dictatorships and war-lords buying guns if one is lucky. Otherwise they support the notion of lazyness and are in the way of growing the economy, which is probably the socialist’s real agenda with throwing money everywhere. And then you have outlawing of certain research regarding cloning and restrictions everywhere. There is no doubt in my mind that cures for things like cancer and AIDS would have been in place many years ago if it wasn’t for government. We can also mention protectionism and border guards and many other things.
ReplyDeleteBut let me put it to you this way: try to stand up for yourself against the government. Stop paying tax, do drugs, print your own currency or do something else that you should be able to do, and watch them go to work. If you believe for one instance that government (anyone of them, regardless of political colour) would not hurt or kill you, you are an idiot.
And even if you ignore the above, one should never forget that governments in all sizes and shapes are the main killer of mankind, ever, without contest.
Can the ”one” that is doing the virus thing stop with that please. I do not agree with the author, but I will punish anyone doing that again. Your bot thing is easy to get rid of, mine will not be. You have been warned.
ReplyDeleteI do not believe that you people are arguing about if she is innocent or not?! The fact is, she got sent to jail for one reason and that is probably not because she is innocent!
ReplyDelete"virus thing"?
ReplyDeleteAnyway, she is guilty; there is no question about that. The question is what she is guilty of and then what is an appropriate punishment. I think that anyone that acts the way she did was an active participant of these murders and consequently should be convicted as a murderer.
ReplyDeleteHave she been punished enough? Maybe, she has spent some time in jail so I would probably think so. But then again, I’m not a relative to any of the victims; she could probably stay inside some years more.
Then there is actually a third topic for debate and that is if the Swedish government ever should do bring criminals "home" just because they hold a Swedish passport. And IF so, when or for whom? All? Just murderers? I think that notion is absurd for the most part. If you commit a crime in a country you either know what you are doing or you are crazy. In either way, Swedish taxpayers shouldn’t pay for this woman if they can avoid it. She should have stayed in the US and when they felt it was time, they could let her out. This way they only dump the cost on Sweden and the remaining victims and relatives might not like this notion. No, send her back with a not that says: “Let her sit 5-10 years more, then let her out”.
Du tycker att det är fel att de svenska skattebetalarna ska stå för hennes omkostnader, men vem ska då göra det?
ReplyDeleteTycker du att det är mer rätt att de amerikanska skattebetalarna ska betala för att en svensk medborgare mördat två amerikaner, varav den ena en polis?
Givetvis vore det bästa att låsa in kvinnan i någon grotta alternativt "slå på strömmen" en sista gång. Jag är dock ingen större fan av dylika påfund, men det torde stå helt klart att brottet begicks i USA och sålunda bör både påföljd och kostnad åläggas de amerikanska skattebetalarna.
ReplyDeleteOavsett vilket är det själva tanken att ens fundera över att plocka "hem" en mördare till hutlösa kostnader bara för att denna råkar ha ett visst pass, helt orimlig.