tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6213093208529982391.post6859771189165509876..comments2024-01-21T05:21:53.264-10:00Comments on The Cautionary Revelation of The Apocalypse: The politically correct strikes againThe Cautionary Revelation of The Apocalypsehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15821985631020193972noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6213093208529982391.post-4251232384039135722009-08-20T22:27:46.236-10:002009-08-20T22:27:46.236-10:00The problem is also that if we do not have a stric...The problem is also that if we do not have a strict enough law, which in turn is enforced, people will start to take the matters in their own hands. And one can be asured that if such a thing happen, more innocent people (most often men) will get hurt than if the juridicial system makes it a bit to easy to get a conviction.<br /><br />I, for example, would make a rapist of someone I love, sease to exist. Or maybe just cut of something dear to him. This is said without condoning the action - I would act out of controlled rage. In theory I know this is anarchy and wrong, but in the heat of the moment, that probably wouldn´t stop me. Or many others, coleric like me.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6213093208529982391.post-34596632370126982592009-08-17T18:25:56.185-10:002009-08-17T18:25:56.185-10:00@anonymous 2:01PM:
The problem is, sometimes a wom...@anonymous 2:01PM:<br />The problem is, sometimes a woman (or man) says no and mean yes. The problem is also that putting all trust in one part of an alledged rape (male or female side), basically condemns everybody on the other side. For example, always trusting the female side means that women can falsely accuse men of rape without much evidence. Seen from the other side, always trusting the male side means men can basically get away with rape.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6213093208529982391.post-45927021487579647602009-08-16T11:01:58.264-10:002009-08-16T11:01:58.264-10:00It should be sufficient that a woman SAYS no - she...It should be sufficient that a woman SAYS no - she shouldn't have to fight to get her no respected. That's why a law on consensual sex would be appropriate - where a yes must be obtained before any sex takes place.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6213093208529982391.post-59178972032964832762009-08-16T10:57:09.360-10:002009-08-16T10:57:09.360-10:00To say that a passive victim is not a victim - is ...To say that a passive victim is not a victim - is horrid - everyone understands that. To exclude someone from their rights on that account is not acceptable, of course. There are so many girls and women that are affected by sexual and verbal abuse in everyday-life - in schools, in "relationships", on the street, in the work-place. And they never speak to anyone about it, let alone press charges. It is not ok - especially not if you consider the grave and long-term consequences for the individual - yielding low self-esteem, need for self medication - cigarrettes, alcohol or even heavier drugs. And it ought to be dealt with. But with comments like this, and prosecuters like Hillgren - the problem and the crimes will not even be addressed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com